Connect with us

California

How a So. California Democrat hopes to become Little Saigon’s first Vietnamese House member

Published

on

How a So. California Democrat hopes to become Little Saigon’s first Vietnamese House member


play

WESTMINSTER, CA – On a cloudy recent holiday morning, as dozens of people who served in the South Vietnamese army mingled after honoring the memories of those who died in the Vietnam War, one veteran called out to his friends to “meet Derek!”

That would be Derek Tran, a micro-celebrity of sorts in Southern California’s Vietnamese community who posed for Memorial Day selfies and shook hands with people interested in meeting the Democratic candidate for an Orange County-based U.S. House seat that his party sees as a critical part of its pathway to winning back the majority in November. The area he’s running to represent is home to Little Saigon, a district with one of the largest Vietnamese populations outside of Vietnam itself.

Advertisement

Despite that claim to fame, Southern California’s Little Saigon has never been represented by a Vietnamese American in federal office.

“It’s weird. It’s not something I’m used to,” Tran, who is Vietnamese, told USA TODAY of his newfound popularity as he made his way around a local park that features two towering statues of American and South Vietnamese soldiers standing side by side, flanked by their respective flags.

“But I take a lot of pride in their excitement about my race, so I take it as it comes,” he added. “They’re appreciative and they are just happy to have someone … that’s going be able to possibly give us a voice in Congress.”

Tran, a 43-year-old political newcomer who previously worked as a lawyer for personal injury and discrimination cases and served in the U.S. Army, is running a campaign in one of the nation’s few competitive House races in the upcoming elections that will determine which party will control the lower chamber and play a major role in shaping or killing the agenda for the White House winner. Highlighting the competitiveness of Tran’s race, it’s one of the handful of districts that President Joe Biden won in the 2020 election but is held by a Republican – Biden won there by six percentage points.

Advertisement

A key component behind Tran’s campaign is his background and ability to connect with the Vietnamese population that Democrats believe no prior candidate could. The hope is that Tran can convince and turn out those voters during a presidential election cycle where Biden will be at the top of the ticket in one of the nation’s deepest blue states.

Whether Tran could capture those voters is essential to flipping the seat as he faces an uphill battle against two-term GOP incumbent Michelle Steel, a 68-year-old Korean American who is well established in local politics and one of the GOP’s strongest fundraisers among vulnerable members, boasting a massive campaign war chest. Though it was just a few days after Tran’s primary victory, at the end of March, Steel reported $3.2 million cash on hand compared to Tran’s near $200,000.

Not only that, Steel’s campaign has capitalized on the Vietnamese community’s GOP leanings before. She’s already built a strong grassroots operation for voter outreach across the whole district that helped her win reelection in 2022, along with controversial messaging points that critics have decried as “red-baiting” to inflame fears of communism among Vietnamese voters.

Lance Trover, a spokesperson for Steel’s campaign, noted the race is about more than just the Vietnamese population in the district and said in a statement to USA TODAY that “Southern Californians of all ethnicities know who they can trust which is why they keep electing Michelle Steel.”

Advertisement

Despite the headwinds facing Tran, his campaign is touting internal poll numbers in the district that shows the Democrat in a dead heat with Steel, trailing her by just one percentage point among likely voters in the district in a head-to-head matchup.

But more notably, Tran far outperforms a generic Democrat among likely Vietnamese voters. Up against Steel, Tran is three points behind. Underscoring the Vietnamese community’s lean towards the GOP, those same voters would favor a generic, unnamed GOP candidate by 25% compared to a generic Democratic candidate.

“There is a political machine behind all this,” Tran said, noting Steel’s husband, Shawn Steel, is also an important figure in the California GOP. “But that doesn’t slow my yearning and my ability to make sure that I beat her by out-canvassing her. I’m going to try to out-fundraise her, but she’s definitely had a head start on me.”

The Vietnamese community in the district runs through Little Saigon, a sprawling enclave of Vietnamese shopping centers, strip malls and restaurants built up in Orange County after hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese refugees flocked to the United States after the fall of Saigon marked the end of the Vietnam War in 1975.

Driving past Carrot and Daikon Banh Mi, a local Vietnamese sandwich shop, Tran recalled asking the restaurant’s owner, a Republican and current Army reservist, whether his campaign could plant signs in front of his business during the state’s primaries. The owner turned them down.

Advertisement

But upon learning Tran was a veteran, the owner changed his mind. When California law permits – 90 days before the election day in November – those signs will again be there for the general election. “The fact that I was a veteran, he respected that, and he allowed us to use his property to place our signs, so that was cool,” Tran said.

Democrats are enthused to have a candidate like Tran, whose background as the son of refugees mirrors the life of so many in Little Saigon. But his candidacy could be undercut by the fact older Vietnamese voters harbor strong feelings against communism.

Vietnamese Americans are the only Asian American demographic to skew towards the GOP, which is perceived as having a stronger stance against China and communism. A Pew Research Center survey conducted last year found that 51% of registered Vietnamese voters either identified with or lean toward the GOP compared to 42% who favor the Democrats. That’s unlike other Asian American voters such as Chinese, Filipino, Indian and Korean voters.

“Don’t get me wrong. There’s people … who’s like, ‘What’s’ your party? What’s your party?’” Tran said. “And I tell them I’m a Democrat and they’re like: ‘Oh. We can’t vote for a Democrat, we’re Republican.’”

Tran says at times, he can “walk them through my upbringing and why I’m running” and for some of those voters, his background resonates and he’s able to persuade them. Others though, he cannot: “So we just leave it at that.”

Advertisement

2022 race marked by accusations of ‘red-baiting’

Illustrating the visceral emotions Vietnamese Americans hold toward communism and the fear that drives some of them to the GOP, the South Vietnamese flag was seen flying across the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 as rioters besieged the building seeking to overturn the 2020 election.

The bright yellow flag bearing red horizontal stripes, commonly used as a symbol of freedom, stuck out to many in the Vietnamese community, flying alongside MAGA flags and other displays of far-right symbols.

Tran is hoping to win over voters from the Vietnamese community who were appalled to see the South Vietnamese flag fly over the Capitol during the deadly insurrection.

“It was just being used inappropriately on January 6. A lot of Vietnamese Americans were ashamed seeing that flag flying up like that,” said Phu Do Nguyen, an attorney and board member of the Vietnamese American Democratic Club in the area supporting Tran. “That flag represents all of us, not just one faction.”

Advertisement

Those feelings of resentment towards the regime that drove out so many who called Vietnam home still linger strongly in Little Saigon. Quan Nguyen, one of the founders of the Museum of the Republic of Vietnam, a humble one-room collection of items ranging from model warships to army uniforms to medals from the Vietnam War, described Little Saigon as the “capital of exiled Vietnamese” who are “very anti-communist.”

He added the community “is very divided” by those who continue to hold such strong feelings toward the communist regime and others who, while they still yearn for the restoration of freedom in their home, don’t hold such similar, intense feelings.

The political power of that sentiment was on full display in the district’s last election in 2022, when Steel faced off against Democratic challenger Jay Chen. Though Chen was the son of Taiwanese immigrants, Steel’s campaign tied him to the Chinese Communist Party, stoking fears in the Vietnamese community.

The attacks labeled Chen on signs as “China’s choice” and Vietnamese language mailers photoshopped him in a classroom holding a copy of “The Communist Manifesto.” Steel’s campaign faced heavy criticism from Democrats and accusations of “red-baiting.” Chen ultimately lost by less than five points, or a little more than 10,000 votes.

“When you’re messaging particularly to a community like the Vietnamese community, which has a long history of trauma with the Communist Party, that’s got to have an impact,” Chen told USA TODAY, calling the attacks “blatantly racist.”

Advertisement

“Those attacks are not going to land the same way,” given Tran is Vietnamese, Chen said. “There are a lot of people in the Vietnamese community who are going to take offense to some of those attacks.”

Tran echoed similar sentiments and said his background as the product of a community that fled communism and tyranny will withstand any labels the GOP tries to put on him.

“Steel is going to have a very hard time painting a son of this community as a communist because an attack on me as a Vietnamese American is an attack on my entire Vietnamese community out here,” Tran said. “She needs the votes out here and she can’t win this district without them.”

“I dare her to attack me and call me a communist because I know my community will respond right away,” Tran added.

Tran’s heritage already poses strong appeal to some Vietnamese voters who have longed to see a candidate that looks and speaks like them.

Advertisement

Tran’s unique strengths to connect with the voters of Little Saigon also comes from his familiar history for many in the community. His parents were among the 2 million Vietnamese boat people who after the war desperately sought to escape Vietnam to neighboring countries. He said his father attempted to flee with his first wife and youngest children, but their boat capsized and Tran’s father was the only one who survived the accident. Back in Vietnam, his father met his mother and managed to successfully flee Vietnam, later relocating to the U.S. where Tran was born.

His family history though is difficult for Tran to recount, describing it as “uncomfortable” to speak openly about and noting it’s not part of his stump speech on the campaign trail: “It’s not my story to tell.”

Democrats see new chance in Tran: ‘He’s fluent’

Tran’s background will be a key defense against any attempts to tie him to communism, one political consultant for California Democrats said on the condition of anonymity to speak candidly given the high stakes of the House campaign. “It was a rough one to put it mildly,” the consultant said about Steel’s attacks and Chen’s campaign. Come Election Day, the race is expected to be close and if Tran does win, it won’t be by a large margin. Though the consultant also argued Tran’s fluency and connection with the Vietnamese community offers Democrats a much stronger chance to flip the seat.

A GOP consultant working on House races, who also spoke to USA Today on the condition of anonymity to candidly discuss the competitive election, echoed the same sentiment and noted Steel is a familiar name for many voters in the district. The GOP consultant dismissed Tran’s use of his background as more of a “talking point.”

Advertisement

To be successful in 2024, Democrats will need to invest in outreach centers and canvass directly to voters in the entire district rather than just make a broad stroke political play solely around Tran’s Vietnamese lineage, according to the GOP consultant who noted both Steel and Rep. Young Kim, another California Republican and Korean American, invested heavily in Asian American voter outreach to build strong grassroots operations that led to their election wins. Chen shared similar feelings, arguing Democrats need “to focus on the AAPI vote and not take it for granted even though AAPIs in general vote Democratic, they can’t take this constituency for granted.”

Whether Tran will be able match Steel’s campaign operation remains “to be seen,” the GOP consultant said, noting the fundraising gap between Steel and her Democratic opponent. Tran’s campaign is still in the process of building a ground game akin to Steel’s. The campaign arm of House Democrats, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, has begun to invest in voter contact, community outreach and organizational support for Tran’s campaign.

The district’s location is another headwind for Tran’s campaign, given that advertising rates in the Los Angeles media market are among the most expensive in the country.

“She has good name recognition,” Tuong Thang, Vietnam News Director of Saigon Broadcasting Television Network, a Vietnamese language television network based out of Little Saigon, said of Steel. “A lot of people already know her,” Thang added, noting her time in local politics serving on Orange County’s board of supervisors.

But Thang argued that Tran is uniquely positioned to win over the Vietnamese community. Though the district also includes a sizable Korean American and Hispanic population, “the swing vote” that will decide the election is in Little Saigon,” Thang said.

Advertisement

“To be honest, Jay’s my friend, (but) he didn’t make the investment in the Vietnamese community that Derek will. It’s not just having surrogates here and there but really having a full on campaign in the Vietnamese community,” said Phu Nguyen, a trustee on the Fountain Valley School district who is supporting Tran. “I think it was a missed opportunity for him.”

Parts of the community are already planning to rally support for Tran in Little Saigon. John Nguyen, co-founder of the Truong Buu Diep Foundation, a faith based non-profit honoring Father Truong Buu Diep, a Vietnamese Catholic Priest, said he has “to share with everyone about how good he is.”

The Truong Buu Diep Foundation, where people from any faith can stop by to pray, offers various free walk-in resources for locals who may need assistance navigating federal government programs such as Social Security and Medicare. For a few years, Tran would offer his own legal knowledge to help those who needed advice on personal and family legal issues.

Those resources are critical for the community, Nguyen said, since “most of them, they don’t know (how to) speak English and they need help from people who have licenses and knowledge.”

Advertisement

Nguyen says he’s going out of his way to support Tran “because of (the) relationship,” he’s built with the Democratic candidate over the years he volunteered for the foundation. When he learned Tran was running for Congress, Nguyen thought that he and his foundation had “to support him totally.”

“I do feel inspired when I hear them talk” about him and his campaign, Tran said. “But I also feel the burden that they put on me. It would be very hard to face them should I lose this election.”

Whether Nguyen and other community members’ support will be enough for Tran and Democrats to flip the seat and give Little Saigon its first Vietnamese representative in Congress is uncertain. For now though, just having a candidate in the first place, almost 50 years after the fall of Saigon, is already an achievement.

Back in Westminster Memorial Park, where Tran and the rest of the attendees moved the Memorial Day processions to plant incense and South Vietnamese flags to honor 81 unknown Vietnamese airmen, a few local Vietnamese language reporters stood by, waiting to interview Tran. After the processions, Tran made himself readily available for any of their questions. He answered in both English and Vietnamese.

“Handsome guy!” one of the local news network reporters quipped, making sure to get a picture with the potentially history-making Democratic candidate after their interview.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

Will this bill be the end of California’s housing vs environment wars?

Published

on

Will this bill be the end of California’s housing vs environment wars?


By Ben Christopher, CalMatters

New housing construction in a neighborhood in Elk Grove on July 8, 2022. Photo by Rahul Lal, CalMatters

This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.

For years California has been stuck in a recurring fight between legislators who want the state to turbocharge new home construction and legislators determined to defend a landmark environmental protection law.

Advertisement

The final showdown in that long-standing battle may have just arrived. 

A new bill by Oakland Democratic Assemblymember Buffy Wicks would exempt most urban housing developments from the 55-year-old California Environmental Quality Act.

If it passes — a big if, even in today’s ascendent pro-building political environment — it would mean no more environmental lawsuits over proposed apartment buildings, no more legislative debates over which projects should be favored with exemptions and no more use of the law by environmental justice advocates, construction unions and anti-development homeowners to wrest concessions from developers or delay them indefinitely.

In short, it would spell the end of California’s Housing-CEQA Wars. 

“If we’re able to get it to the governor’s desk, I think it’s probably one of the most significant changes to CEQA we will have seen since the law’s inception,” said Wicks.

Advertisement

Wicks’ broadside at CEQA (pronounced “see-kwah”) is one of 22 housing bills that she and a bipartisan group of legislators are parading out Thursday as a unified “Fast Track Housing Package.” Wicks teed up the legislative blitz earlier this month when she released a report, based on the findings of the select committee she chaired last year, that identified slow, uncertain and costly regulatory approval processes as among the main culprits behind California’s housing crisis. 

The nearly two dozen bills are a deregulatory barrage meant to blast away at every possible choke point in the housing approval pipeline. 

Most are eye-glazingly deep in the weeds.

There are bills to standardize municipal forms and speed up big city application processes. One bill would assign state and regional regulatory agencies strict timelines to approve or reject projects and another would let developers hire outside reviewers if cities blow the deadlines. Different bills take aim at different institutions identified as obstructionist: the California Coastal Commission, investor-owned utilities and local governments throwing up roadblocks to the construction of duplexes.

Wicks’ bill stands out. It’s simple: No more environmental lawsuits for “infill” housing. It’s also likely to draw the most controversy.

Advertisement

“It’s trying something that legislators have not been willing to try in the past,” said Chris Elmendorf, a UC Davis law professor and frequent critic of CEQA. “And the reason they have not been willing to try in the past is because there are a constellation of interest groups that benefit from the status quo.  The question now is whether those interest groups will kill this or there’s a change in the zeitgeist.”

A spokesperson for CEQA Works, a coalition of dozens of environmental, conservation, and preservation advocacy organizations, said the members of the group needed more time to review the new legislation before being interviewed for this story.

A spokesperson for the State Building and Construction Trades Council, which advocates on behalf of tens of thousands of unionized construction workers in California, said the organization was still “digging into” the details of the bill.

What’s the big deal?

The California Environmental Quality Act has been on the books since 1971, but its power as a potential check on development has ebbed and flowed with various court rulings and state legislative sessions. The act doesn’t ban or restrict anything outright. It requires government agencies to study the environmental impact of any decisions they make — including the approval of new housing — and to make those studies public.

In practice, these studies can take years to complete and can be challenged in court, sometimes repeatedly. 

Advertisement

Defenders of how the law applies to new housing argue that CEQA lawsuits are, in fact, relatively rare. Critics counter that the mere threat of litigation is often enough to pare down or entirely dissuade potential development. 

As state lawmakers have come around to the idea that the state’s shortage of homes is the main driver of California’s punishingly high cost of living — and a major political vulnerability for Democrats — CEQA has been a frequent target. 

Until now, attacks on the law have generally come in the form of selective carve-outs, conditioned exemptions and narrow loopholes.

“If we’re able to get it to the governor’s desk, I think it’s probably one of the most significant changes to CEQA we will have seen since the law’s inception.”

Buffy Wicks, Assemblymember, Democrat, Oakland

There’s the law that lets apartment developers ignore the act — but only so long as they set aside some of the units at a discount and pay their workers union-level wages.

Advertisement

A spate of bills from two years ago waived the act for most homes, but only if they are reserved exclusively for low-income tenants. 

There was the time a CEQA lawsuit held up a UC Berkeley student housing project over its presumptively noisy future tenants and the Legislature clapped back with a hyper-specific exemption.

Wicks’ new bill is different, in that the exemption is broad and comes with no strings attached. It would apply to any “infill” housing project, a general term for homes in already built-up urban areas, as opposed to fresh subdivisions on the suburban fringes.

That echoes a suggestion from the Little Hoover Commission, an independent state oversight agency, which made a series of “targeted reform” proposals to the environmental law last year.

“California will never achieve its housing goals as long as CEQA has the potential to turn housing development into something akin to urban warfare—contested block by block, building by building,” the report said. “The Commission recommends that the state exempt all infill housing from CEQA review— without additional conditions or qualifications.” 

Advertisement

Wicks bill defines “infill” broadly as any housing in an urban area that’s either been previously developed or surrounded by developed lots and doesn’t sit on a wetland, a farm field, a hazardous waste site or a conservation area. 

The site also has to be less than 20 acres to qualify for the exemption, but at roughly the size of 15 football fields, that’s not likely to be a limiting factor for most housing projects.

One possible rub: When a housing project varies from what is allowed under local zoning rules and requires special approval — a common requirement even for small housing projects — the exemption would not apply.

Enter another bill in the housing package, Senate Bill 607. Authored by San Francisco Democratic Sen. Scott Wiener, that bill would also exempt those rezonings from CEQA if the project is consistent with the city’s state-mandated housing plan.

“Put the two bills together and it’s really a dramatic raising of the ante in terms of what the pro-housing legislators are willing to put on the table and ask their colleagues to vote for,” said Elmendorf.

Advertisement

An environmental case against the Environmental Quality Act?

Environmental justice advocates regularly use the law to block or extract changes from developments that they argue will negatively affect low-income communities. Developers and lawyers regularly claim that organized labor groups defend the law to preserve it as a hard-nosed labor negotiation tool. Well-to-do homeowners who oppose local development projects for any reason may turn to CEQA to stall a project that otherwise passes muster on paper. 

All these groups have pull in the California capitol. That may be one reason why this kind of bill hasn’t been introduced in recent memory.

Wicks said she thinks California’s Legislature may be ready to take up the cause. The severity of the housing crisis, Democratic electoral losses over the issue of unaffordability, and the urgency to rebuild in the wake of the Los Angeles wildfires all have created a “moment” for this argument, she said.  

She, and other supporters of the bill, also insist that the cause of the environment is on their side too. 

“I don’t view building infill housing for our working class communities in need as on par with drilling more oil wells in our communities, yet CEQA is applied in the same way,” she said.

Advertisement

Researchers have found that packing more homes into already-dense urban areas is a good way to cut down carbon emissions. That’s because living closer to shops, schools, jobs and restaurants mean more walking and biking and less driving, and also because downtown apartments, which tend to be smaller, require less energy to heat and cool. 

Even if infill is, in general, more ecologically friendly than sprawl development, that doesn’t mean that a particular project can’t produce a wide array of environmental harms. In a letter to the Little Hoover Commission, the California Environmental Justice Alliance, a nonprofit member of CEQA Works, highlighted the 2007 Miraflores Senior Housing project in Richmond. 

A final environmental impact report for the project “added strategies to mitigate the poor air quality, water quality, and noise impacts” associated with the development and “included plans to preserve the historic character of buildings, added key sustainability strategies, and improved the process for site clean up.” That report was certified by the city in 2009.

Jennifer Hernandez, a land-use attorney and one of the state’s most prolific critics of CEQA, said local permit requirements and public nuisance rules should be up to the task of addressing those problems, no outside litigation required.

“The whole construct of using CEQA to allow the dissenting ‘no’ vote, a community member with resources, to hold up a project for five years is just ridiculous,” she said. “It’s like making the mere act of inhabiting a city for the people who live there a harm to the existing environment.”

Advertisement

This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Where in California do renters stay the longest?

Published

on

Where in California do renters stay the longest?


A very tight market for California rentals means tenants move less frequently than the typical U.S. apartment dweller.

My trusty spreadsheet looked at a RentCafe scorecard tracking the challenges apartment seekers face in 139 U.S. markets – including 11 in California – as of early 2025. RentCafe’s math is based on data from Yardi that covers large apartment complexes.

These numbers tell us that a California renter lives in the same unit for 33 months, according to the median stay of the 11 Golden State markets. Nationally, a 28-month stay is the norm. That’s 18% longer for California renters.

Advertisement

Californians are unlikely to move because it’s so challenging to find a rental. Only 5.1% of Golden State apartments were empty as 2025 started, compared with a 6.7% vacancy rate nationwide.

That gap is a key reason why RentCafe’s national rankings have five California markets among its 25 “hardest to rent” list compiled from a collection of data points: Orange County (No. 14), Silicon Valley (No. 16), Eastern Los Angeles County (No. 17), San Diego (No. 22), and Central Valley (No. 24).

These headaches force Californians to shop harder for apartments. The typical vacant unit gets 10 looks from prospective tenants statewide vs. seven nationally.

However, Californians will relocate when the right spot becomes available. Just 51% of Golden State renters are renewing their leases this year vs. 63% nationally.

Regionally speaking

The length of a renter’s stay is not uniform across the state. Here’s how these 11 California markets compare, ranked by the length of the typical renter’s stay …

Advertisement

Eastern L.A. County: 40-month average stays as 51% of tenants renew. There are 4% empty units that get 13 looks from prospective tenants. This region includes areas that lost housing to January’s Eaton wildfire.

North L.A. County/Ventura County: 36-month stays, 54% renew, with 4.9% vacancies getting 10 looks.

San Francisco Peninsula/North Bay: 35-month stays, 48% renew, with 6.4% vacancies getting 7 looks.

Orange County: 35-month stays, 61% renew, and 4.4% vacancies getting 10 looks.

Central Valley: 34-month stays, 51% renew, with 4% vacancies getting 9 looks.

Advertisement

Sacramento: 33-month stays, 51% renew, with 5.2% vacancies getting 10 looks.

East Bay: 33-month stays, 51% renew, with 6% vacancies getting 8 looks.

Inland Empire: 33-month stays, 55% renew, with 5.1% vacancies getting 12 looks.

Silicon Valley: 31-month stays, 54% renew, with 4.9% vacancies getting 10 looks.

San Diego: 31-month stays, 54% renew, with 5.4% vacancies getting 9 looks.

Advertisement

Western L.A. County: 30-month stays, 42% renew, with 7% vacancies getting 8 looks. January’s Palisades fire was in this area.

Any help?

Sadly for apartment seekers, any noteworthy relief is not coming as California’s construction of fresh rental supply severely lags the nation.

U.S. developers are adding 75 new rentals for every 10,000 existing units. Currently, just one of these 11 California markets tops that pace – Silicon Valley at 93 new units per 10,000.

The rest of the state, ranked by their construction rate? Eastern L.A. and the Inland Empire at 63 per 10,000, followed by East Bay (62), San Diego (58), North L.A./Ventura  (42), San Francisco/North Bay (33), Sacramento (23), Central Valley (20), Western L.A. County (18), and Orange County (15).

Jonathan Lansner is business columnist for the Southern California News Group. He can be reached at jlansner@scng.com

Advertisement

Originally Published:



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Refreshed maps reveal fire hazard zones across Central California

Published

on

Refreshed maps reveal fire hazard zones across Central California


TULARE COUNTY, Calif. (KFSN) — For the first time in 14 years, California’s fire hazard severity zones maps have been updated by the state fire marshal.

Based on fire history and conditions of locations, areas across the state rank from Moderate to High and Very High fire risk.

“The hazard maps are being updated to more accurately reflect areas of California that have a higher risk of wildfires, and it’s a good tool for the public to know how prepared to be,” said Savanna Birchfield-Gernt, with CAL FIRE in Tulare County.

“While it is helpful to be prepared, it is helpful to know to see a marker for where you are and see a risk of hazard.”

Advertisement

Action News asked about the biggest change from the old maps to the new ones.

“The addition of moderate and high fire hazards severity zones, and with that is a new requirement as of January 1st 2026, for new development to construct homes to chapter 7-A in the high fire hazard severity zones,” explained Jim McDougald, assistant deputy director for Wildfire planning and risk reduction with CAL FIRE.

In both Kings and Tulare counties, the fire hazard zones that made the list include Avenal, Woodlake, and parts of Porterville.

Plus, several unincorporated areas.

The land spans about 27,000 acres in Tulare County and close to 59,000 in Kings County, which sit between Moderate and High Risk.

Advertisement

“What I will tell people is we always want you to be aware of wildfires, especially when you are living in the foothills of Tulare County, where you will likely see CAL FIRE,” said Birchfield-Gernt.

In Tulare County’s unincorporated communities, nearly 500 acres are considered Very High risk, compared to none in 2011.

“A lot of people are worried about insurance when it comes to the fire hazard severity zones, so insurance companies use a different rating — they use a risk rating, and ways that people can reduce their ratings where they live is by doing things like home hardening and defensible space,” explains Birchfield-Gernt.

Cal Fire says people should work on defensible space year-round.

The first rounds of inspections are currently underway for foothill communities, including Springville, Posey or California Hot Springs, and Three Rivers..

Advertisement

People will have three rounds of defensible space inspections before citations are issued.

Cal Fire says their primary goal is to give people the opportunity to learn more about wildfire readiness.

You can visit this website to find the Fire Hazard Severity Zones.

The latest severity zone recommendations in California can be found here.

For news updates, follow Kassandra Gutierrez on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 KFSN-TV. All Rights Reserved.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending