Lifestyle
Is Melania Trump’s Wedding Dress Really on eBay?
Is it or isn’t it?
On Tuesday, a listing surfaced on eBay purportedly offering Melania Trump’s wedding dress for sale. You know, the one designed by John Galliano for Dior couture, reportedly costing more than $100,000, worn by the first lady at her Mar-a-Lago wedding to Donald J. Trump and featured on her only Vogue cover, in February 2005.
The dress, priced at $45,000 by a woman who identifies herself as Svjabc1 and is in Massapequa, N.Y., is described as being “made of duchesse satin” with “a figure-hugging silhouette, a 90-meter voluminous skirt and embroidered with 1,500 Swarovski diamonds.” According to the listing, the seller bought the dress from Mrs. Trump for her own wedding in 2010 for $70,000. It does not come with any proof of authenticity, other than 21 photos highlighting its billowing train and diamanté embroidery, which are juxtaposed against the famous Vogue cover, presumably to show the similarity.
The magazine story, which described the soon-to-be Mrs. Trump’s search for her gown during the couture shows, also contained many details about the dress that made news at the time and have resurfaced with the sale, including the fact that it weighed 60 pounds and took 550 hours to complete.
Almost immediately the news was embraced by numerous outlets, proclaiming, “You Can Buy Melania Trump’s Wedding Dress” (The Spectator) and “How Much Would You Pay for Melania Trump’s Wedding Dress?” (The Cut). As of Wednesday morning, the listing was being “watched” by 224 people.
Leaving aside the fact that the seller acknowledges on the listing that she made “a few changes” to the gown — more satin, more embroidery and straps — which means it no longer looks identical to Mrs. Trump’s gown, there’s another problem. The designer Hervé Pierre, Mrs. Trump’s longtime stylist (he made her inauguration gowns in 2017 and 2025), said of her wedding dress, “I stored the gown myself in Palm Beach.”
And then added, “Two years ago.”
Neither the first lady’s office nor the seller responded to multiple requests for comment. Dior likewise declined to comment on the dress, noting that it was a policy not to discuss interactions with couture clients. A spokesman pointed out, however, that a couture gown always comes with a label and a number. To authenticate it, he said, they would need to see the dress in person.
Mr. Pierre said that the wedding dress he stored in Florida for Mrs. Trump had a label on the side as well as a ribbon with a reference number. In the multiple close-ups of the gown for sale on eBay, none shows a label.
Alexis Hoopes, the vice president for fashion at eBay, said the company was founded on trust and referred to its widespread Authenticity Guarantee policy, which covers watches, handbags, jewelry, streetwear, sneakers and trading cards, though she acknowledged that the guarantee program did not extend to “the item in question.”
Still, the decision to use eBay to sell a historic garment, albeit one that has been altered, is a peculiar one, said Cameron Silver, the owner of the Los Angeles vintage boutique Decades.
“I would always suggest an auction house for historic garments with provenance,” he said. Companies like Christie’s have auctioned clothes from figures like Audrey Hepburn, while Julien’s in London sold Princess Diana’s gowns, and Kerry Taylor Auctions handled the clothes of Elizabeth Taylor, Leslie Caron and Jerry Hall.
The listing first came to attention through Liana Satenstein’s Substack, Neverworns. Ms. Satenstein said she became aware of it through a friend, Patricia Torvalds, who was looking for a vintage wedding dress and had been corresponding with the seller. According to Ms. Torvalds, the seller, who has been on eBay since November 2021, has moved 119 items and has a positive feedback rating of 98.8 percent, said she had sourced the dress through another friend, who claimed to know Mrs. Trump.
According to eBay messages between the two women that were seen by The New York Times, the seller said the label was taken out when the dress was altered by the seamstress and never replaced. (She also has a number of other items listed on eBay, including a diamond wedding band made as a replica of the one Mrs. Trump wore on her wedding day.) She said that she was getting a lot of messages from people curious about the gown and its origins. Nevertheless, the listing is still up.
Where the dress may actually have come from is unclear. Often, when a well-known figure gets married in a public way and the gown is featured in a magazine like Vogue, it will be copied by any number of bridal designers and offered for sale. The original dress was inspired by a look from Mr. Galliano’s “Empress Sissi” Dior couture collection in February 2004, so it is possible that a sample was sold.
In any case, the willingness of many people to accept the idea that the dress could have belonged to Mrs. Trump and that she was willing to sell her wedding gown — a garment it is generally accepted most people keep forever — is a reflection of the complicated feelings people have about the Trumps, their relationship and the precedents they have set in monetizing their lives.
Indeed, Mrs. Trump herself sells jewelry, ornaments and her own memecoin via her website. In 2022, in a break with first lady precedent, she auctioned off another historic piece of clothing from her wardrobe rather than donating it to the National Archive: the white hat she wore in 2018 during the first Trump administration on the occasion of the French state visit.
Of course, at the time of that sale, the first lady made sure to sign the hat just in case there was any doubt where it had come from.
Lifestyle
Terry Tempest Williams on why women with big ideas get labeled ‘crazy’ : Wild Card with Rachel Martin
A note from Wild Card host Rachel Martin: I met Terry Tempest Williams about 25 years ago at a writer’s conference in Yosemite Valley. I was a young reporter who was there to do a story about how literature was addressing climate change and she made such a huge impression on me. I had never heard someone talk about the natural world the way Terry did and she had a spiritual depth I hadn’t encountered in my life at that point.
To this day, Terry’s writing always reorients me towards what is good, what is beautiful, and what is true. Her newest book is called “The Glorians.”
Lifestyle
Meow Wolf taps famed L.A. animation house for its new Los Angeles venue
For its upcoming Los Angeles venue, experiential art firm Meow Wolf will focus on the art of storytelling, with a specific eye toward skewering our city’s moviemaking magic. To help bring that vision to life, Meow Wolf has entered into a creative partnership with Titmouse, one of L.A.’s most renowned independent animation houses.
The Hollywood-based studio behind popular series such as “Big Mouth” and “Star Trek: Lower Decks” will create animation that will be shown throughout the West L.A. venue, which is on target for a late 2026 opening at the Howard Hughes entertainment complex.
It’s a move that represents a shift for Santa Fe, N.M.-based Meow Wolf. Over the last decade-plus, the art collective has grown beyond its anything-goes, punk-meets-psychedelic roots into an organization with full-scale, maximalist installations in its hometown, Denver, Las Vegas, Houston and the Dallas suburbs. In the past, Meow Wolf kept most of its media in-house.
As part of its larger-than-life participatory art installations, Meow Wolf L.A. will feature a mix of live action and animation, the former filmed by Meow Wolf in its Santa Fe studio. Meow Wolf’s James Stephenson, a senior VP with the company and its creative director of emerging media, said the degree to which the L.A. exhibition will lean into various animation styles necessitated an outside partner. Titmouse’s work, in development by a number of directors with contrasting tones, will be shown on a variety of formats, ranging from cinema screens to full-room projections.
“I really believe in animation as an art form, and I know the Titmouse folks do too,” Stephenson says. “Animation is made by artists. It’s made by artists with their own hands. It’s something that is still very rooted in craft.”
Meow Wolf’s L.A. space is set in a former cinema complex, and will champion its location, taking guests on a journey through a converted movie house and beyond, into a sci-fi-inspired fantasyland with sentient spaceships and a 30-foot-tall mushroom tower. Meow Wolf creatives have spoken of the fantastical movie theater as one that will feature animated, self-aware candy before attendees enter the main exhibition space, making Titmouse’s work some of the first art guests will encounter. Titmouse co-founder Chris Prynoski has said the studio has lined up at least six directors for the exhibit.
An in-progress art installation destined for Meow Wolf L.A. at the art collective’s Santa Fe, N.M., headquarters. The L.A. exhibition will feature animation from Titmouse.
(Gabriela Campos / For The Times)
Titmouse, says Stephenson, is the right partner because “they’re known less for a house style, and more for a house vibe.” Over the years, Titmouse has been behind such diverse shows as “Scavengers Reign,” owning a Jean Giraud influence rooted in French and Spanish surrealism, the lively “Jentry Chau vs. the Underworld,” with an unique color palette that took inspiration from anime and Chinese mythology, the exaggerated comic book feel of Adult Swim’s “Metalocalypse,” and the approachable yet expressive tone of “Star Trek: Lower Decks.”
“Meow Wolf’s vibe is similar to Titmouse’s vibe,” Stephenson says. “It’s artist-first, artist-driven, independent and kinda edgy. They are always trying to find the edge of what’s possible. They try to see how far they can go, and it’s done for fun and in the spirit of taking risks.”
Prynoski says working with Meow Wolf will give Titmouse a sense of artistic freedom it doesn’t always have when delivering content for more traditional Hollywood partners. He says the multi-director approach is a callback to the early days of Warner Bros. Animation, when individual creators put their own stamp on Looney Tunes material.
“I use Bugs Bunny as an example,” Prynoski says. “You’ve got a Friz Freleng Bugs Bunny short. You’ve got a Chuck Jones Bugs Bunny short. You’ve got a Tex Avery Bugs Bunny short. They’re all different versions of Bugs Bunny, and people who are really paying attention can tell which director directed each one. Even though to the layman, these are all Bugs Bunny, but if you lined them up, they are drawing in different styles, sensibilities and techniques.”
Prynoski says that was a centerpiece of his pitch to Meow Wolf, noting that characters will reappear in multiple installations, each handled by a different artist. Meow Wolf L.A., in fact, will be the firm’s most character-driven exhibition, as guests will follow the storylines of three main protagonists throughout the space.
In announcing the partnership, Meow Wolf and Titmouse released an image from an animated work directed by Luca Vitale. It features a key character having a moment with a hummingbird and it’s done in an elegant, slightly anime-influenced style. It’s an image full of movement, reflecting a character in transition with inviting pastels and bold dashes.
“I like that image because I think it captures some of the sense of wonder that we want people to feel,” Stephenson says. “The character is having an encounter with the elusive nature of creativity and reality in a way that makes them have a different perspective of what’s possible.”
Other contributing animation directors to Meow Wolf L.A. include Space Dawg, Felix Colgrave, Alexander Vanderplank and Phimémon Martin, and Jun Ioneda.
Titmouse’s partnership with Meow Wolf will extend beyond the L.A. exhibition. The two will be working on the development of Meow Wolf New York, which is slated to open some time after Los Angeles, and are collaborating on a planned animated series, which Prynoski is spearheading.
Meow Wolf exhibits are the result of sometimes hundreds of disparate artists coming together in a shared space. Distilling that into a signature, singular style for a series could be a challenge. Stephenson pinpoints some guiding principles.
“You really need to feel the hand of the artist,” he says. “You need to feel a DIY aesthetic. You need to feel the materiality. Those are very specific to what we are.”
Lifestyle
Appeals court denies Trump’s request to halt removal of his name from the Kennedy Center
The Kennedy Center on June 28, with its facade signage still covered by a tarp and scaffolding.
Alex Wroblewski/AFP via Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Alex Wroblewski/AFP via Getty Images
On Wednesday, a federal appeals court denied President Trump’s request to stop the removal of his name from Washington, D.C.’s Kennedy Center. The signage on the building has been covered with tarp and scaffolding since June 13, but in a court filing last month, the center’s current executive director said that Trump’s name has been removed.
In their decision, three judges from the U.S. District Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said that the president had failed to prove that the arts center would be “irreparably injured” without Trump’s name attached to it.

NPR requested comment from the Kennedy Center, but did not receive an immediate reply.
This latest round of court decisions is part of the ongoing litigation filed by Rep. Joyce Beatty, D-Ohio, against President Trump and the board of the Kennedy Center. In a statement emailed Wednesday to NPR, Beatty said: “Today’s ruling again affirms that this administration’s efforts to rename the Kennedy Center were unlawful. His name no longer desecrates this sacred memorial, which belongs to the American people. Now it is time for the Trump administration to accept this, comply with the law, and take the tarps down.”
In previous court filings, Trump’s legal team had asserted that removing the president’s name from the arts complex, both on the physical building and in its digital materials, would inflict irreparable harm in both time and money already spent. In the denial, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Robert Wilkins and Gregory Katsas — wrote that since Trump’s name has already been removed, “a stay would not avert those harms.”
Furthermore, Trump had claimed that without his name attached, future fundraising would be threatened “and [will] contribute to the financial decline of the Center.” In response, the appeals judges wrote: “Appellants, however, have failed to support this assertion with any specific facts or evidence. They offer only the conclusory assertions of the Kennedy Center’s Executive Director that were made in a factually unsupported declaration.” The center’s current executive director, Matt Floca, specializes in physical plant management.

The presiding judge in the case, Christopher R. Cooper, has ordered that the center provide him a status report on the center’s operation and programming before the end of this month. As of Wednesday, the center’s calendar lists a small roster of programs, including outdoor free movie screenings, workshops for children, and five free live performances in July on its Millennium Stage. In the past, the Kennedy Center presented over 2,000 arts and education events each year, including free daily Millennium Stage performances.

-
New Hampshire29 seconds agoTrans athletes drop lawsuit to gain access to girls’ sports in New Hampshire after SCOTUS ruling
-
New Jersey6 minutes agoFamily describes frantic moments delivering baby on the NJ Turnpike
-
New Mexico13 minutes ago
Hidden gem in Cloudcroft, New Mexico has best BBQ in US
-
North Carolina16 minutes agoNorth Carolina Airport Looks to Expand Commercial Service | AirlineGeeks.com
-
North Dakota21 minutes agoSan Francisco plots risky socialist bank modeled after controversial experiment
-
Ohio28 minutes ago
Feeling itchy? Ohio leads nation with 6 cities on Orkin’s 2026 bed bug list
-
Oklahoma31 minutes agoOklahoma’s Brent Venables named to 2026 Dodd Trophy Preseason watch list
-
Oregon36 minutes agoRyan Reynolds-backed Aviation Gin shutters Oregon distillery