Lifestyle
Is Melania Trump’s Wedding Dress Really on eBay?
Is it or isn’t it?
On Tuesday, a listing surfaced on eBay purportedly offering Melania Trump’s wedding dress for sale. You know, the one designed by John Galliano for Dior couture, reportedly costing more than $100,000, worn by the first lady at her Mar-a-Lago wedding to Donald J. Trump and featured on her only Vogue cover, in February 2005.
The dress, priced at $45,000 by a woman who identifies herself as Svjabc1 and is in Massapequa, N.Y., is described as being “made of duchesse satin” with “a figure-hugging silhouette, a 90-meter voluminous skirt and embroidered with 1,500 Swarovski diamonds.” According to the listing, the seller bought the dress from Mrs. Trump for her own wedding in 2010 for $70,000. It does not come with any proof of authenticity, other than 21 photos highlighting its billowing train and diamanté embroidery, which are juxtaposed against the famous Vogue cover, presumably to show the similarity.
The magazine story, which described the soon-to-be Mrs. Trump’s search for her gown during the couture shows, also contained many details about the dress that made news at the time and have resurfaced with the sale, including the fact that it weighed 60 pounds and took 550 hours to complete.
Almost immediately the news was embraced by numerous outlets, proclaiming, “You Can Buy Melania Trump’s Wedding Dress” (The Spectator) and “How Much Would You Pay for Melania Trump’s Wedding Dress?” (The Cut). As of Wednesday morning, the listing was being “watched” by 224 people.
Leaving aside the fact that the seller acknowledges on the listing that she made “a few changes” to the gown — more satin, more embroidery and straps — which means it no longer looks identical to Mrs. Trump’s gown, there’s another problem. The designer Hervé Pierre, Mrs. Trump’s longtime stylist (he made her inauguration gowns in 2017 and 2025), said of her wedding dress, “I stored the gown myself in Palm Beach.”
And then added, “Two years ago.”
Neither the first lady’s office nor the seller responded to multiple requests for comment. Dior likewise declined to comment on the dress, noting that it was a policy not to discuss interactions with couture clients. A spokesman pointed out, however, that a couture gown always comes with a label and a number. To authenticate it, he said, they would need to see the dress in person.
Mr. Pierre said that the wedding dress he stored in Florida for Mrs. Trump had a label on the side as well as a ribbon with a reference number. In the multiple close-ups of the gown for sale on eBay, none shows a label.
Alexis Hoopes, the vice president for fashion at eBay, said the company was founded on trust and referred to its widespread Authenticity Guarantee policy, which covers watches, handbags, jewelry, streetwear, sneakers and trading cards, though she acknowledged that the guarantee program did not extend to “the item in question.”
Still, the decision to use eBay to sell a historic garment, albeit one that has been altered, is a peculiar one, said Cameron Silver, the owner of the Los Angeles vintage boutique Decades.
“I would always suggest an auction house for historic garments with provenance,” he said. Companies like Christie’s have auctioned clothes from figures like Audrey Hepburn, while Julien’s in London sold Princess Diana’s gowns, and Kerry Taylor Auctions handled the clothes of Elizabeth Taylor, Leslie Caron and Jerry Hall.
The listing first came to attention through Liana Satenstein’s Substack, Neverworns. Ms. Satenstein said she became aware of it through a friend, Patricia Torvalds, who was looking for a vintage wedding dress and had been corresponding with the seller. According to Ms. Torvalds, the seller, who has been on eBay since November 2021, has moved 119 items and has a positive feedback rating of 98.8 percent, said she had sourced the dress through another friend, who claimed to know Mrs. Trump.
According to eBay messages between the two women that were seen by The New York Times, the seller said the label was taken out when the dress was altered by the seamstress and never replaced. (She also has a number of other items listed on eBay, including a diamond wedding band made as a replica of the one Mrs. Trump wore on her wedding day.) She said that she was getting a lot of messages from people curious about the gown and its origins. Nevertheless, the listing is still up.
Where the dress may actually have come from is unclear. Often, when a well-known figure gets married in a public way and the gown is featured in a magazine like Vogue, it will be copied by any number of bridal designers and offered for sale. The original dress was inspired by a look from Mr. Galliano’s “Empress Sissi” Dior couture collection in February 2004, so it is possible that a sample was sold.
In any case, the willingness of many people to accept the idea that the dress could have belonged to Mrs. Trump and that she was willing to sell her wedding gown — a garment it is generally accepted most people keep forever — is a reflection of the complicated feelings people have about the Trumps, their relationship and the precedents they have set in monetizing their lives.
Indeed, Mrs. Trump herself sells jewelry, ornaments and her own memecoin via her website. In 2022, in a break with first lady precedent, she auctioned off another historic piece of clothing from her wardrobe rather than donating it to the National Archive: the white hat she wore in 2018 during the first Trump administration on the occasion of the French state visit.
Of course, at the time of that sale, the first lady made sure to sign the hat just in case there was any doubt where it had come from.
Lifestyle
Hunting For Lexapro Clocks, Viagra Neckties and Other Vintage Pharmaceutical Merch
Zoe Latta, a co-founder of the fashion brand Eckhaus Latta, saw the clock on Instagram and started searching for pharma swag on eBay. “It was just a hole I got in,” she said. Latta soon rounded up some examples at “Rotting on the Vine,” her Substack newsletter, describing them as “silly byproducts of our sick sad world.”
Pharma swag feels somewhat like Marlboro Man merch — “like this very specific modality of our culture that’s changed,” Latta said, adding, “At first, I thought it was ironic and cheeky. But it’s also so dark.”
In particular, swag like the OxyContin mugs that read “The One to Start With. The One to Stay With” is regarded as highly collectible and highly contentious. Jeremy Wells, a newspaper owner and editor in Olive Hill, Ky., remembered, for example, seeing the mugs sold at a Dollar Tree in New Boston, Ohio, in the late 1990s or early 2000s. “At the same moment that the epidemic is blowing up,” he said.
“You can do a chicken-and-egg argument, and I doubt very seriously that those mugs made anybody get addicted,” he said. “But I do feel like things like those mugs did add to the mystique and the aura of seduction.” (After a protracted lawsuit, Purdue Pharma, the maker of OxyContin, has been dissolved and is on the hook to pay more than $5 billion in criminal penalties for fueling the opioid epidemic.)
“I was surprised to see how much this stuff was selling for in general — there is demand,” Latta said, pointing to a vintage Xanax photo frame listed for $230. Latta said she could imagine buying it for a friend who takes Xanax on planes (“if it was at a thrift store for under $10”) or maybe a pair of Moderna aviator sunglasses that she found, which seem to nod at Covid vaccines and the signature Biden eyewear, she said.
Pharmacore — medical-branded pieces worn as fashion — has found new expression at the confluence of identity, medicine and commerce, and at a time when skepticism toward pharmaceuticals is at a high (see: the MAHA movement).
Lifestyle
He’s your ex, not your son. Unconditional love does not apply
Goth Shakira wears a Blumarine jacket, vintage Jean Paul Gaultier top from Wild West Social House, Jane Wade bra and Ariel Taub earrings.
My ex-boyfriend, whom I just got out of a relationship with, had a pure heart and was a loyal lover. However, he lacked ambition and his family didn’t have the best values. I don’t see myself raising children with him because I don’t want my kids to be surrounded by his family. (I broke up with him on the night of his birthday because his sister got violent with me.) We dated for over a year and I’d always be the one to take care of the check when we’d go out on dates. He had no network, so we would always hang out with my friends and colleagues. Am I wrong for leaving him? Is his loyalty worth going through all that?
Girl. (“Girl” is a gender-neutral term of endearment, by the way.) I’m going to need you to take a deep breath, look at your gorgeous self in the mirror and relish in the fact that you have made the right decision.
First, let’s focus on the good. Loyalty and purity of heart are beautiful traits that many, many people on this earth have. When you find someone who does, and then combine that with your attraction and attachment to this person (along with the reality that many, many people also lack these traits), it makes sense that you’d be feeling like your ex is a rare find that you might not encounter again. However, you can care for someone, and also acknowledge the truth that the life they are setting themself up for is not the life you envision living — or, crucially, the life that you envision your children living. A long-term partnership is so much more than love. It requires a shared vision for fulfillment and happiness, based on compatible values. It necessitates a wholeness from both parties, wherein two individuals take ownership and accountability over their own success and well-being. It is loving to let someone go so they can live their life in peace and free of judgment, and even find someone else whose version of an ideal life more closely matches theirs. Most importantly, letting someone go who you know is not aligned with the life you want to live is a deeply self-loving act.
The meaning I glean from your words is this: It’s not so much that you yearn for him romantically and fear you made a mistake simply because your life is empty without him. (In fact, it sounds like you were the one adding a lot of value to his otherwise limited existence through your resources.) It seems that you feel guilty for leaving him behind as you went on to pursue a better life for yourself. That kind of feeling is more caretaking, and dare I say maternal, than loving (at least the kind associated with romantic partnership). He’s your ex, not your son. Unconditional love is only healthy and appropriate in the context of a parent-child relationship, and that’s not the situation here. People who engage in romantic relationships with men — women, femmes, gay men, etc. — are socialized to be ever-forgiving, to have infinite patience and compassion. The lines get blurred when you do feel kindness and genuine compassion for someone you care about. It can be difficult to discern when you’re being too harsh, and when you’re just setting a healthy boundary. Society makes it difficult for us in that way. But we don’t have to succumb to that pressure.
You can’t fall in love with someone’s potential. If a person, especially a man, shows up to a relationship as someone you can’t envision spending an extended period of time with, then that’s not your person. Not only is it impossible to truly “fix” or “change” anyone, it’s simply not an efficient or productive use of your precious energetic and material resources. Of course, we all change over time, and hopefully in positive ways. But that change needs to be self-directed, coming from within each individual. “Change” exerted on another through force robs the receiving party of the dignity of authoring their own life path. Even the verbiage of your question indicates that you’ve already extended a lot of generosity and patience toward someone who didn’t feel like working toward social and financial independence, and setting boundaries with their family should have been a top priority. I can sense your exhaustion underneath the guilt. That’s the root of the matter. And what matters is you.
I can sense your exhaustion underneath the guilt.
Loss is just space. It can hurt and feel empty at first. But it also allows you the room you need to expand your world with abundance, not shrink it and drain it into scarcity. Affirm in your heart and in your mind that love itself is an infinite resource. If you channel the patience and generosity that you once put into your ex into a life where you are fulfilled to the utmost, the right person (or people) will find you.
And, girl. Some time from now, when you are loved by a man who takes his own dignity seriously, and supports you in the feminine energy of rest and calm that you deserve to experience and embody, you will be so grateful to this current version of you that had the courage to let go. I’m proud of you.
Photography Eugene Kim
Styling Britton Litow
Hair and Makeup Jaime Diaz
Visual Direction Jess Aquino de Jesus
Production Cecilia Alvarez Blackwell
Photo Assistant Joe Elgar
Styling Assistant Wendy Gonzalez Vivaño
Lifestyle
She Had Seen Her in Photos. Then They Met in Real Life.
The kiss finally happened at a Halloween party Chatterjee hosted at her apartment, while the two were watching “American Psycho” on the couch at 3 a.m., when everyone else had gone out for food. “We’re sitting so close our legs are touching and I’m freaking out,” Braggins said.
“I looked at Abby, and I was like, ‘I’d rather kiss you than watch this,’” Chatterjee said. So they did. About a month later, they were official.
On April 10, Braggins suggested they take a trip to Home Goods in Brooklyn. When they ended up at Coney Island Beach instead, Chatterjee was none the wiser. It was an early morning, so the two, along with the dog they adopted together, Willow, enjoyed having the beach to themselves.
Braggins ran ahead with Willow and crouched behind some rocks. When Chatterjee got a glimpse of Willow, there was a bandanna tied around her neck. It said, “Will you marry me?” Braggins pulled out a shell with a ring in it. The answer was yes.
A few days before, Chatterjee had proposed to Braggins amid a gloomy, cloudy sky on top of the Empire State Building.
The two were married on April 21 at the New York City Marriage Bureau, in front of three guests, by Guohuan Zhang, a city clerk. Afterward, they celebrated at Bungalow, an Indian restaurant in the East Village, with a few more friends.
Though Chatterjee’s parents were not present at the wedding, one of the couple’s most meaningful moments came in 2023, when Braggins traveled to India to meet Chatterjee’s family for the first time. Chatterjee had never brought a partner home before, and she had warned Braggins that same-sex relationships were still not widely accepted there. But by the end of the trip, Chatterjee’s mother had embraced Braggins as family, telling her, “I have two daughters now.”
-
Pennsylvania5 minutes agoPennsylvania Medical Marijuana And Hemp Regulation Bill Sets The State Up For Broader Recreational Legalization, GOP Senator Says – Marijuana Moment
-
Rhode Island11 minutes agoProposed tax hike would hurt small businesses and our communities | Opinion
-
South-Carolina17 minutes ago11 Unforgettable Small Towns to Visit in South Carolina
-
South Dakota23 minutes agoHuman trafficking survivor advocate to speak at Rapid City church event
-
Tennessee29 minutes agoEthan Mendoza injured as No. 4 Texas loses to Tennessee, 5-1
-
Texas35 minutes agoWarm Saturday in North Texas ahead of severe weather chances later for Mother’s Day
-
Utah41 minutes ago
Discover the deliciousness of New York-style pizza at Fini Pizza in Utah City
-
Vermont47 minutes agoVermont teen dies in crash with tree