California

Counties with the worst commutes in California

Published

2 years ago

April 29, 2022

Commuting simply ranks as one of many least fulfilling components of an individual’s day. Commuters encounter extra bodily well being issues, and low-income commuters are much less prone to achieve monetary stability—amongst a number of different destructive impacts. And but, America’s commutes preserve getting longer as folks transfer farther away from the workplace, in line with census knowledge.

Stacker compiled a listing of counties with the worst commutes in California utilizing knowledge from the U.S. Census Bureau. Counties are ranked by longest common commute time in 2019. Suppose you may have a protracted journey to work? Learn on to check it towards the worst commutes statewide.

#30. San Diego County

– Common commute time: 26.5 minutes
— #954 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 11.1% shorter than state common
— 4.0% shorter than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 2.2%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 15.5%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 2.1%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (76.2%), carpooled (8.6%), walked (2.9%), public transportation (3%), labored from residence (7%)

#29. Mariposa County

– Common commute time: 26.6 minutes
— #934 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 10.7% shorter than state common
— 3.6% shorter than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 4.8%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 17.9%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 21.5%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (60.8%), carpooled (12.5%), walked (11.4%), public transportation (2%), labored from residence (10.1%)

#28. Tuolumne County

– Common commute time: 26.9 minutes
— #886 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 9.7% shorter than state common
— 2.5% shorter than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 6.5%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 15.2%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 16.2%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (82.9%), carpooled (6.7%), walked (2.1%), public transportation (0.6%), labored from residence (5.9%)

#27. Ventura County

– Common commute time: 27.2 minutes
— #829 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 8.7% shorter than state common
— 1.4% shorter than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 3.5%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 15.8%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 21.1%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (78.7%), carpooled (11.1%), walked (1.7%), public transportation (1.1%), labored from residence (6%)

#26. Sutter County

– Common commute time: 27.5 minutes
— #795 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 7.7% shorter than state common
— 0.4% shorter than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 3.6%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 21.3%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 45.2%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (78.9%), carpooled (12.7%), walked (1.6%), public transportation (0.7%), labored from residence (4.7%)

#25. Santa Cruz County

– Common commute time: 27.7 minutes
— #763 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 7.0% shorter than state common
— 0.4% longer than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 3.9%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 10.6%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 22.2%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (69%), carpooled (9.2%), walked (4.9%), public transportation (3%), labored from residence (7.8%)

#24. Sacramento County

– Common commute time: 27.8 minutes
— #741 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 6.7% shorter than state common
— 0.7% longer than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 3.4%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 14.0%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 19.1%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (77.1%), carpooled (10.1%), walked (1.8%), public transportation (2.5%), labored from residence (6.3%)

#23. Placer County

– Common commute time: 27.9 minutes
— #724 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 6.4% shorter than state common
— 1.1% longer than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 3.5%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 13.0%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 35.6%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (79.5%), carpooled (6.9%), walked (1.3%), public transportation (1.1%), labored from residence (9.9%)

#22. Orange County

– Common commute time: 28 minutes
— #699 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 6.0% shorter than state common
— 1.4% longer than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 3.0%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 13.6%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 14.8%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (78.3%), carpooled (9.6%), walked (1.9%), public transportation (1.9%), labored from residence (6.4%)

#21. Madera County

– Common commute time: 28.3 minutes
— #663 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 5.0% shorter than state common
— 2.5% longer than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 4.3%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 26.2%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 36.6%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (76.6%), carpooled (13.8%), walked (1.7%), public transportation (0.5%), labored from residence (3.6%)

#20. Merced County

– Common commute time: 28.6 minutes
— #615 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 4.0% shorter than state common
— 3.6% longer than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 8.6%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 25.7%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 29.5%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (79.1%), carpooled (9.4%), walked (2.4%), public transportation (1.2%), labored from residence (3.5%)

#19. San Mateo County

– Common commute time: 29.3 minutes
— #522 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 1.7% shorter than state common
— 6.2% longer than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 1.9%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 9.0%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 42%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (67.8%), carpooled (10.2%), walked (2.6%), public transportation (11%), labored from residence (5.3%)

#18. Santa Clara County

– Common commute time: 29.3 minutes
— #522 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 1.7% shorter than state common
— 6.2% longer than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 3.0%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 9.1%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 13.2%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (74.7%), carpooled (10.6%), walked (2.1%), public transportation (4.4%), labored from residence (5%)

#17. Stanislaus County

– Common commute time: 29.9 minutes
— #454 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 0.3% longer than state common
— 8.3% longer than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 8.6%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 21.9%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 25.5%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (81.8%), carpooled (10.1%), walked (1.2%), public transportation (0.8%), labored from residence (4.7%)

#16. Yuba County

– Common commute time: half-hour
— #445 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 0.7% longer than state common
— 8.7% longer than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 3.3%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 22.1%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 56.3%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (79.6%), carpooled (11.6%), walked (1.4%), public transportation (0.9%), labored from residence (5%)

#15. El Dorado County

– Common commute time: half-hour
— #445 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 0.7% longer than state common
— 8.7% longer than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 4.8%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 13.3%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 39.1%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (76.9%), carpooled (8.7%), walked (1.8%), public transportation (1.4%), labored from residence (9.5%)

#14. Sierra County

– Common commute time: 30.6 minutes
— #386 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 2.7% longer than state common
— 10.9% longer than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 1.9%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 22.4%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 33.6%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (72%), carpooled (6.9%), walked (2.3%), public transportation (0.3%), labored from residence (18.2%)

#13. Lake County

– Common commute time: 30.7 minutes
— #371 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 3.0% longer than state common
— 11.2% longer than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 7.0%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 17.3%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 23.6%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (68.8%), carpooled (12.2%), walked (3.3%), public transportation (0.7%), labored from residence (14.2%)

#12. San Bernardino County

– Common commute time: 31.6 minutes
— #290 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 6.0% longer than state common
— 14.5% longer than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 6.5%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 23.4%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 28.6%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (79.6%), carpooled (11%), walked (1.5%), public transportation (1.4%), labored from residence (5.2%)

#11. Los Angeles County

– Common commute time: 31.8 minutes
— #277 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 6.7% longer than state common
— 15.2% longer than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 4.0%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 14.5%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 7.1%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (74%), carpooled (9.5%), walked (2.7%), public transportation (5.8%), labored from residence (5.6%)

#10. Marin County

– Common commute time: 32.6 minutes
— #220 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 9.4% longer than state common
— 18.1% longer than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 4.3%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 7.9%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 36.3%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (64.1%), carpooled (8.2%), walked (3.4%), public transportation (9.6%), labored from residence (12.4%)

#9. Amador County

– Common commute time: 32.7 minutes
— #213 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 9.7% longer than state common
— 18.5% longer than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 7.1%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 21.0%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 30.8%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (78.8%), carpooled (8.8%), walked (1.7%), public transportation (0.1%), labored from residence (9.4%)

#8. Solano County

– Common commute time: 33.2 minutes
— #183 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 11.4% longer than state common
— 20.3% longer than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 7.4%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 22.5%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 41.7%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (76.5%), carpooled (13.2%), walked (1.2%), public transportation (3.2%), labored from residence (4.5%)

#7. San Francisco

– Common commute time: 33.8 minutes
— #151 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 13.4% longer than state common
— 22.5% longer than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 3.9%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 5.7%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 22.9%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (32.1%), carpooled (6.9%), walked (11.8%), public transportation (34.8%), labored from residence (6.6%)

#6. Riverside County

– Common commute time: 34 minutes
— #138 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 14.1% longer than state common
— 23.2% longer than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 7.7%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 24.2%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 29%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (78.3%), carpooled (11.9%), walked (1.4%), public transportation (1.3%), labored from residence (5.4%)

#5. San Joaquin County

– Common commute time: 34.2 minutes
— #131 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 14.8% longer than state common
— 23.9% longer than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 10.2%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 24.1%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 29.2%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (78.8%), carpooled (12.9%), walked (1.4%), public transportation (1.7%), labored from residence (4.1%)

#4. Alameda County

– Common commute time: 34.3 minutes
— #127 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 15.1% longer than state common
— 24.3% longer than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 4.9%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 10.6%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 36.8%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (60.9%), carpooled (9.8%), walked (3.5%), public transportation (15.8%), labored from residence (6.4%)

#3. San Benito County

– Common commute time: 35.7 minutes
— #81 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 19.8% longer than state common
— 29.3% longer than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 9.3%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 22.8%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 54.6%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (80.8%), carpooled (12.3%), walked (1.4%), public transportation (0.6%), labored from residence (3.2%)

#2. Calaveras County

– Common commute time: 38.3 minutes
— #38 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 28.5% longer than state common
— 38.8% longer than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 8.4%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 21.0%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 45.5%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (76.8%), carpooled (10.7%), walked (1.3%), public transportation (1%), labored from residence (9.8%)

#1. Contra Costa County

– Common commute time: 38.7 minutes
— #33 longest amongst all counties nationwide
— 29.9% longer than state common
— 40.2% longer than nationwide common

– Staff with 90+ minute commute: 9.2%
– Left for work from 12 a.m. to six a.m.: 16.7%
– Labored outdoors county of residence: 42.5%
– Technique of transportation: drove alone (67.5%), carpooled (11.5%), walked (1.6%), public transportation (10.9%), labored from residence (6.6%)

Source link

Related Topics:California Featured Local news

Click to comment

California

Walmart and Target to make major policy change to every store across California

Published

2 hours ago

September 28, 2024

Press Room

Walmart and Target to make major policy change to every store across California

By Alice Wright For Dailymail.Com

Published: 16:37 BST, 28 September 2024 | Updated: 17:09 BST, 28 September 2024

Walmart, Target, and Albertsons alongside other grocery giants are all making a big change to their stores in California.

Governor Gavin Newsom has signed a law banning plastic bags being used at such stores in the state.

The change will take legal effect on January 1, 2026, and will affect all grocery stores.

Some grocery chains such as Whole Foods have already phased out plastic bags at their checkouts nationwide.

Consumers will be encouraged to bring their own bags to do their shopping, and those who do not will be offered a paper alternative.

The new law will only affect the plastic bags used at supermarket checkouts, not the plastic bags that contain produce.

Californians will soon be offered paper bags at the supermarket checkout

The change comes after a decade of hard-fought campaigning from politicians trying to outlaw the bags.

In 2014 a similar law was passed in California but it only outlawed thin plastic bags, leaving a loophole for stores to use thicker plastic.

Laura Deehan, the director of Environment California, told local news that the bags actually created more waste as shoppers did not reuse or recycle the thicker bags.

‘There was a sudden surge in these much thicker plastic bags,’ Deehan, who campaigned for the new law, told KABC-TV.

‘The grocery stores felt like they met the definition of a reusable plastic bag, but what we found is that they’re really not being reused at all.’

In 2004 Californians threw away an average of eight pounds of plastic every year, which increased to eleven pounds per year by 2021, a state study concluded.

The law ‘clearly needed a redo,’ Jenn Engstrom, of the California Public Interest Research Group told the Associated Press.

‘Plastic bags create pollution in our environment and break into microplastics that contaminate our drinking water and threaten our health,’ she explained.

‘With the Governor’s signature, California has finally banned plastic bags in grocery checkout lanes once and for all.’

The law also redefined what can be considered a recyclable bag.

Gavin Newsom introduced the US’s first plastic bag ban while mayor of San Francisco in 2007

As of 2028 only bags made from 50 percent or more recycled materials can be classified as recyclable.

Newsom has a long-history of fighting against plastic bag use, having introduced America’s first plastic bag ban in 2007 while mayor of San Francisco.

Now hundreds of cities across 28 states have their own plastic bag bans in place.

Some form of state-wide plastic bag ban now exists in twelve states, including New York.

The UK passed a law forcing supermarkets to charge for plastic bags in 2015, which led to a 98 percent reduction in their use according to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

Stores often face a backlash when they alter packaging to cut down on plastic use.

Earlier this year Costco began selling its $4.99 rotisserie chickens in soft plastic bags instead of the traditional hard-shelled plastic containers at its US locations.

The redesign uses 75 percent less plastic and cuts the use of 17 million pounds of resin a year, according to Costco.

But shoppers were quick to complain that the new design causes a mess in trollies, cars and fridges – as it allows meat juice to leak out.

Source link

California

California first responders unite to help Hurricane Helene victims

Published

10 hours ago

September 28, 2024

Press Room

California first responders unite to help Hurricane Helene victims

SACRAMENTO — As the aftermath of Hurricane Helene unfolds, California’s first responders are stepping up to help those affected in Florida.

Approximately 120 first responders from across the Golden State, including Sacramento, are helping in various roles. Sacramento is teaming up with other federal response members from across the nation in a management position.

Larry Collins, deputy chief of Special Ops HazMat with the California Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES), emphasized the importance of this nationwide response, stating: “We go there because it’s about neighbor helping neighbor. They would help us if we had a big disaster.”

It’s part of a plan that launched in the 90s, with rotational system of emergency responders organized to go where they are needed most. Collins calls this mutual aid is essential.

“When it happens here in California and we need the help, we can rely on these other 20 urban search and rescue teams from other states to help us,” Collins said.

Deployed on Friday were crews from Southern California including from Los Angeles, Orange County, Riverside, and San Diego.

Sacramento personnel were pre-positioned on Tuesday, driving to Orlando to be ready to respond as the weather conditions and storm track changed.

“We’re coordinating the movement of all these search and rescue and swift water assets,” Collins explained. “It’s intense. They’re working in the rain. They are in the darkness, in some cases. They have trees falling down power lines falling down.”

The public information officer deployed with the Sacramento crew is Charlie Lubowicki, of the FEMA US&R Incident Support Team. He explained the importance of everyone bringing their own expertise to the table during times like this.

“It’s a testament to the system that has been built here in the United States,” Lubowicki said. “Those who go to wildfires and are in these large dynamic events all the time, and so they have a very special skill set that when they come out east, they are able to bring to the planning process.”

Federal support and resources

A crucial element of this operation is the backing provided by FEMA, which will reimburse California for the costs associated with sending these teams, given that this is a federally declared disaster. This support enables the state to deploy its resources without jeopardizing local emergency response capabilities.

Officials have reassured the public that despite the ongoing wildfire season, California maintains a robust set of resources ready for “no notice emergencies,” such as earthquakes. The state’s ability to respond to local emergencies remains unaffected by its commitments to national disaster relief.

Source link

California

California Social Security gets new requirements for some beneficiaries

Published

19 hours ago

September 27, 2024

Press Room

California Social Security gets new requirements for some beneficiaries

California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed a new bill that would protect Social Security benefits for tens of thousands of residents in the state.

By signing AB 2906 into law on Thursday, Newsom will now ensure that Social Security survivor benefits go to the foster youth they are intended for.

Under the new bill, it would now be required for foster youth and their legal guardians be notified if anyone is applying as a payee of Social Security survivor benefits. For years, these benefits were intercepted by the state despite being intended for foster children when they turn 18. The bill passed unanimously in the state legislature before it went to Newsom’s desk last month.

Newsweek has reached out to the Social Security Administration and Newsom via email for comment.

While Newsom vetoed a similar legislation last year that included both foster youth survivor and disability benefits, the pressure from the public may have pushed him to approve the bill this time around.

Around 70 California judges signed a letter asking the governor to sign the bill earlier this month, and both the Los Angeles and San Diego Boards of Supervisors approved of the law.

“For some of California’s foster children, having access to these previously pilfered assets may be the difference between aging out of care into homelessness or with a roof over their heads,” Amy Harfeld, national policy director at the Children’s Advocacy Institute at the University of San Diego School of Law (CAI), said in a statement. “We are grateful for Governor Newsom placing California among the growing number of states that are acting to end this shameful practice while helping address California’s homeless challenge to boot.”

Somewhere between 40,000 and 80,000 children in California are eligible for Social Security benefits, but they often face poverty or outright homelessness after reaching 18 years of age. Between the ages of 19 and 21, 29 percent of former foster youth experienced homelessness, according to the Children’s Advocacy Institute.

California Governor Gavin Newsom is seen on August 19 in Chicago. Newsom recently passed a new bill that protects Social Security benefits for foster youth.

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

The payments they were owed could have prevented this, but for years, California counties would divert the Social Security benefits into their own funds.

While federal law requires county foster care agencies to put the best interests of foster children first regarding the Social Security money, counties have been sidestepping these requirements without consulting the children set to receive the benefits.

Previously in California, counties could apply for foster kids’ benefits without telling the child or their representative, and a judge was not required to oversee the child’s care.

Foster children qualify for Social Security if they either have a disability or had a parent pay a certain amount of money into the Social Security system before retiring, becoming disabled or dying. But due to prior rules, many never saw the money they were owed.

“These funds amount to a rounding error for counties,” said Robert Fellmeth, founder and executive director of the Children’s Advocacy Institute, in a statement. “For eligible foster youth, having access to their money could mean an entirely different life, one in which they have a real shot at stable housing, food security, transportation, and education.”

California is one of many states that are looking to create more substantial protections for these foster kids’ Social Security payments.

As of this summer, 30 states and jurisdictions have taken action to protect foster youth benefits. Arizona, Washington, D.C., Oregon and Massachusetts have abolished holding payments from foster system beneficiaries entirely.

“The push Governor Newsom and other lawmakers are in California are making to cover this often-neglected group mimics what we’ve seen in some other states,” Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek.

He added: “Those who find themselves as beneficiaries of Social Security under foster care survivor status aren’t often mentioned when we speak about protecting Social Security benefits in general, but they are a subgroup that is overlooked and one that heavily relies on this funding. The passing of this bill would be pivotal in making sure they are financially supported through the system for the years to come in a meaningful way.”

Source link