Autumn brings the return of students to campus — and, with them, inevitable chatter about rising education costs.
California
College is increasingly unaffordable in California. Tuition isn’t the main problem

Students and families gather outside UC Berkeley’s Anchor House on Aug. 21, 2024 in Berkeley. Student housing is now the biggest line item for many attending the university.
Earlier this month, the Trump Administration added to this chatter by proposing a “compact” that would require universities to freeze tuition for five years. This discourse, however, tends to overlook a crucial wrinkle: college is expensive, but at many universities, the main culprit isn’t tuition, it’s housing.
At UC Berkeley, tuition is under $18,000 per year — far less than many private high schools in the Bay Area. Tuition for a high schooler at San Francisco’s Lick Wilmerding will set a family back more than $60,000 per year.
Article continues below this ad
Housing is where the cost of college really racks up.
For 2025-2026, UC Berkeley estimates its own annual room and board price at $22,000 — 20% more than the cost of taking a full course load. Students who want to live on campus thus face a total sticker price of about $40,000.
What families need to understand as they consider the college is that the so-called “cost of attendance,” which bundles tuition with room and board, is the price of proximity to campus culture.
Lest we scoff at spending more than $80,000 over four years on room and board just to get “the college experience,” we should recall that campus culture is more than parties and football games. Being close to faculty and other students is often the catalyst for informal learning and relationship formation that smooth the path to employment, generate research ideas and build companies.
Living on or near campus is not just fun, it’s often foundational.
In 2009, for example, two Berkeley students started Alphabet Energy, which would go on to patent important thermoelectric technology. In 2017, two others founded Kiwi Campus, a delivery robot company. Covariant, a leading AI and robotics company, was founded by Berkeley professor Pieter Abbeel and his former students Peter Chen, Rocky Duan and Tianhau Zhang in 2017 as well.
Article continues below this ad
Stories like these are why Pitchbook ranks Berkeley number one in the world at spawning startups. (Sorry, Stanford.)
Unfortunately, California’s traditional deference to local politics has made housing both on campus and near campus painfully scarce.
The $22,000 annual room and board bill keeps students out of campus housing, pushes up prices off campus, and prevents connections that could have otherwise sparked innovation. Across the UC system, opposition to new on-campus and off-campus housing has blocked enrollment expansion.
The most well-known example is the controversy over Berkeley’s People’s Park. Thanks to the obstructionist tools provided by the California Environmental Quality Act, local activists were able to stall UC’s plan for another 1,000 campus housing slots for years before the state Supreme Court finally cleared the way for construction in 2024. Meanwhile, nearby residents sued UCLA in 2018 to stop the construction of a tall housing complex near campus. While that building ultimately went up, it has fewer units than originally planned. And to this day, activists at UC Santa Cruz have stymied the building of what the school calls the Student Housing West project.
Using procedural veto points, often on dishonest environmental grounds, California activists have enacted a college housing blockade. The result is that our schools are smaller and more expensive, our students are more scattered and our scientific and technological progress is delayed.
Article continues below this ad
There is good news to report, though. A couple of years ago, the state legislature exempted campus housing projects paying union-negotiated wages and receiving a special environmental certification from CEQA. Amendments last year lowered barriers further. This year, the legislature cleared away the CEQA barriers to essentially all housing in existing urban areas, not just narrow categories like “student dorms on university-owned property built with union labor and certified as ‘super-green.’”
But clearing away procedural obstacles is only half the battle.
California also needs to ensure that local governments zone land for dense housing near universities. Again, progress is at hand. Last Friday, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed into law Senate Bill 79, a controversial measure that allows 4-8 story apartment buildings within a half mile of fixed transit stops, and Assembly Bill 893, which allows 4-6 story apartment buildings and student dorms within a half mile of UC, CSU and community college campuses.
Unfortunately, AB893 does not apply to parcels that cities have zoned for low-density residential housing. It also requires developers to pay union-negotiated “prevailing wages,” which are prohibitively costly in most markets. SB79 strikes a better balance. It establishes union-labor standards only for expensive high-rise projects. And it applies to all land in the target geographies (½ mile of transit), while giving cities flexibility to “reallocate the density” among the affected parcels. Local governments will be able to limit incursions on the status quo in neighborhoods where preservationist sentiment runs strongest, so long as the city allows commensurately greater density in other areas near transit.
Guest opinions in Open Forum and Insight are produced by writers with expertise, personal experience or original insights on a subject of interest to our readers. Their views do not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Chronicle editorial board, which is committed to providing a diversity of ideas to our readership.
Read more about our transparency and ethics policies
To supercharge college housing and enhance the agglomeration effects UC is so famous for, the state should treat student housing like the critical infrastructure that it is. Future legislatures should extend SB79 so that it covers a ring around every university. If it does so, California will make college more accessible and add to the creative ferment it facilitates.
Article continues below this ad
This is the true college experience — and its payoffs redound far beyond the campus.
Jordan McGillis (@jordanmcgillis) is a Novak Journalism Fellow. Christopher Elmendorf (@CSElmendorf) is a law professor at UC Davis.

California
California’s incarcerated firefighters to see a ‘historic’ pay increase in laws Newsom signed

By Cayla Mihalovich, CalMatters
This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.
Gov. Gavin Newsom today signed a set of bills meant to recognize incarcerated firefighters, including a historic measure to raise their pay to meet the federal minimum wage during active fires.
The wage increase, funded through the state budget, follows years of advocacy to improve pay and working conditions for incarcerated labor. That effort took on a new urgency after hundreds of incarcerated firefighters were deployed to battle deadly wildfires that hit Los Angeles in January.
State lawmakers this year introduced a seven-bill “Firefighting to Freedom” package to protect incarcerated firefighters and support job opportunities upon their reentry. Five of those bills were signed into law today, marking the most comprehensive changes to incarcerated firefighting in the state’s history.
Incarcerated firefighters previously earned between $5.80 and $10.24 per day, according to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. During active emergencies, Cal Fire pays them an additional $1 per hour. Now, they will earn $7.25 per hour when they’re on a fire.
Assemblymember Isaac Bryan, a Democrat from Culver City who authored the bill, said Californians should feel proud about the sense of moral clarity that crossed party lines.
“This is a historic and momentous day,” said Bryan. “The governor signing the bill is an incredibly powerful reminder that all labor is dignified and anybody who is willing to put their lives on the line deserves our gratitude.”
Bryan initially set out to raise wages for incarcerated firefighters to $19 per hour, but settled on the federal minimum wage after budget negotiations. The bill was opposed by the California State Sheriffs’ Association over concerns of its potential fiscal impact on counties, which administer jails and could also face pressure to increase pay for incarcerated labor.
It received bipartisan support from nearly two dozen lawmakers.
“A number of years ago, when I worked for Cal Fire, you have never seen men work harder than with these crews,” said Assemblymember Heath Flora at a legislative hearing in September, a Republican from Ripon who co-authored the bill. “There is not a system — there is not a program — better than the fire camps with Cal Fire and the state of California.”
Bryan introduced the bill after voters last year rejected a ballot measure that would have ended forced labor in prisons and jails. It would have amended the state’s constitution to repeal language that allows involuntary servitude as a form of criminal punishment, making work assignments voluntary.
California’s incarcerated firefighters have long provided critical support to state, local and federal government agencies in responding to various emergencies, including wildfires and floods. They’re voluntary assignments.
Over 1,800 incarcerated firefighters live year-round in minimum-security conservation camps, also known as “fire camps,” located across 25 counties in California, according to the corrections department. Those numbers have dwindled in recent years due to a declining prison population.
Two of the proposals did not pass, including one that would have required Cal Fire to create more opportunities for incarcerated firefighters to secure firefighting jobs upon their release. The proposal, Assembly Bill 1380, did not reach Newsom.
That was disappointing to Royal Ramey, a formerly incarcerated firefighter who co-founded the nonprofit organization Forestry and Fire Recruitment Program, which sponsored the measure. But he said the other five bills signed by Newsom are “huge progress.”
“For me, transitioning from fire camp into a career was one of the hardest challenges of my life, and I know too many people who never got that chance,” said Ramey. “With these laws, we can change that story.”
The package of bills Newsom signed included:
- Assembly Bill 247: Requires incarcerated firefighters be paid $7.25 per hour while actively fighting a fire.
- Assembly Bill 799: Requires the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation pay a death benefit of $50,000 for the death of an incarcerated firefighter.
- Assembly Bill 812: Requires the corrections department to create regulations around referring incarcerated firefighters for resentencing.
- Assembly Bill 952: Requires the corrections department to establish and expand the Youth Offender Program Camp Pilot Program as a permanent program.
- Senate Bill 245: Streamlines and expedites the expungement process for formerly incarcerated firefighters.
“It’s incredibly heartening to see that the Legislature has taken the issue of protecting incarcerated firefighters seriously,” said Taina Angeli Vargas, executive director of the nonprofit organization Initiate Justice Action, which co-sponsored most of the bills. “It’s about time that the state of California began to treat them with more respect and dignity.”
Assemblymember Sade Elhawary, a Democrat from Los Angeles who authored the law to establish and expand the youth pilot program, said it’s an opportunity for the 13 other states that have incarcerated firefighters to “follow in the footsteps of California.”
“I hope this is the beginning of what will be a national movement to elevate the rights and opportunities for incarcerated firefighters,” she said. “All of these folks deserve more love and support.”
Cayla Mihalovich is a California Local News fellow.
This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.
California
NTSB, FAA gather evidence from California chopper crash
California
Storm headed to Southern California; residents near burn scars should take precautions

Safety tips for flooding conditions
It is never safe to drive or walk into flood waters. Here are some safety tips for flooding conditions.
A storm headed to Southern California, the first of the season, could bring steady showers and gusty winds the first part of the week.
The storm is expected to start overnight Monday into Tuesday and has the potential for thunderstorms, said Kristan Lund, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service.
If a thunderstorm does materialize, it could produce heavier rain through Ventura County, gustier winds of up to 50 mph, even small hail and a very small chance of a tornado, she said Oct. 12.
Lund encouraged residents to be prepared and ensure they have multiple ways of learning about potential warnings for flash floods and other emergency conditions.
She also advised residents to check and clear storm gutters, if they can, prior to the storm.
As of Oct. 12, rainfall totals were expected to reach between 0.75 and 1.5 inches.
How should residents near burn scars prepare?
Given the forecast, residents in and around the Mountain Fire burn scar should take precautions. Lund said to listen to local authorities about advisories and make sure electrical devices are charged.
The threshold for possible issues in the fire area is between 0.8 to 1 inch of rain per hour. But the greater worry is intense rain on a subhourly basis or 30-minute periods during which rain falls reach higher rates, Lund said.
“The 1 inch per hour isn’t out of the question especially if thunderstorms move through,” she said. “It’s really the subhourly rate we’re really worried about.”
For Ventura County, the peak time for the storm is predicted between 5 a.m. Tuesday to noon. The time could be adjusted as the storm gets closer.
“It’s during the morning commute time, unforuntately,” Lund said of the worst of the storm.
The meteorologist cautioned drivers to be aware of road conditions. Even a few inches of water on the road could be enough to lose control.
If the intensity of rain makes seeing difficult, it’s better to pull over and let the storm pass before resuming driving, she said.
“If a thunderstorm does occur, make sure you’re under cover,” Lund said.
Snow levels are likely to fall to 6,000 to 7,000 feet Tuesday with the possibility of accumulations at resort levels, according to the weather service.
Stacie N. Galang is news director of the Ventura County Star. She can be reached at 805-437-0222 or stacie.galang@vcstar.com.
-
Augusta, GA4 days ago
‘Boom! Blew up right there’: Train slams into semi in Grovetown
-
Wisconsin5 days ago
Appleton Public Library wins 2025 Wisconsin Library of the Year award for distinguished service
-
Vermont5 days ago
Feds: Springfield dealer ran his drug business from Vermont jail
-
Business5 days ago
Los Angeles Times Media Group takes step to go public
-
Virginia5 days ago
Match 13 Preview: #8 Virginia
-
West Virginia6 days ago
West Virginia eatery among Yelp’s “outrageous outdoor dining spots”
-
News4 days ago
What we know about the charges against New York’s Attorney General Letitia James
-
Politics5 days ago
Spanberger refuses to urge Jay Jones to exit race, dodges questions after ‘two bullets’ texts