Connect with us

California

California towns with cute ‘backyard cottages’ are booming – but not everyone is happy about it

Published

on

California towns with cute ‘backyard cottages’ are booming – but not everyone is happy about it


Californians are sidestepping the state’s acute housing shortage and soaring property prices by building cute cottages in their backyards – but not everyone is happy about this new development. 

Advocates say in-law suites or accessory dwelling units (ADUs) are the quickest and easiest way to get people into livable homes. 

But some experts are warning that ADUs can drive down the price of single-family homes in neighborhoods because potential buyers may not want to live near the tenant of the backyard unit. 

Others complain that these tiny homes are not a comparable substitute for building more traditional homes to combat housing shortages. 

Advertisement

Despite this, many people are continuing to build ADUs – often to house elderly relatives who need assistance and have no use for a big home anymore. 

After Teddy Gray King’s mother passed away in 2021, she decided to move her 88-year-old father into a prefabricated house on her property in Piedmont, a small Bay Area town just outside Oakland.

Pictured: An accessory dwelling unit on display. Many of them aren’t bigger than 1,000 square feet and have one bedroom

He had been living in a 3,000-square-foot home in Millbrae, which King said he was able to sell so it could be freed up for another family.

King said she bought the prefab house from an Oakland-based company for $268,000 and had it airlifted to her backyard in 2022.

‘In a place like Piedmont where…many houses have a big backyard, it’s kind of a perfect way for infill development (and) it’s pretty low impact from the visual perspective,’ she told the San Francisco Chronicle.

Advertisement

Wealthy communities like Piedmont – where the median household income is more than $250,000 – are the predominant areas where these backyard cottages get built, according to government data that tracks what type of housing is being constructed across the state.

After all, King paid nearly $270,000 for the one-bedroom home her father now lives in, which is higher than the median sale price for an entire house in Cleveland, Ohio, or Buffalo, New York.

King still made off with a discount though, since there isn’t a single one-bedroom home in Piedmont on the market for less than $389,000.

Pictured: A 650-square-foot backyard cottage in Oakland, California

Pictured: A 650-square-foot backyard cottage in Oakland, California

Pictured: The exterior of the cottage, complete with a living area and a kitchen

Pictured: The exterior of the cottage, complete with a living area and a kitchen

However, if the goal with ADUs is to house more people who are being squeezed by rising rent in California, it’s unlikely to succeed.

A brief from the Virginia Housing Commission found that a significant percentage of ADUs don’t rent for below-market rates.

Advertisement

Scott Wild, the senior vice president of real estate-focused firm John Burns Research & Consulting, recently authored a report that agreed with this assessment.

‘If rented out, ADUs usually garner decent premiums over nearby multifamily rentals, positioning them at the high end of the comparable rental spectrum,’ Wild claimed. 

A 2021 bill from the New York assembly tried to address this issue by creating an ADU financing program for homeowners who wanted to build one on their property. 

But if they took a loan from the program, they’d have to rent the unit at a below-market rate in their area.

This proposal never made it out of committee.

Advertisement
Pictured: A 499-square foot ADU in Los Angeles. Putting a '1/2' on the address number is a common practice for properties like this

Pictured: A 499-square foot ADU in Los Angeles. Putting a ‘1/2’ on the address number is a common practice for properties like this

Prefabricated accessory dwelling units are often small enough to be delivered by truck, pictured, or even be airlifted straight onto the property

Prefabricated accessory dwelling units are often small enough to be delivered by truck, pictured, or even be airlifted straight onto the property

Meanwhile, California is steaming ahead, leading the nation in the number of ADUs built. 

Piedmont Mayor Jennifer Cavenaugh said the city doesn’t have many unused lots available for housing, which could be why no new living space has been built in Piedmont except for ADUs over the last three years.

ADUs were the only new housing built in two other Bay Area cities in 2022 and 2023: Los Altos and Hillsborough. 

Matt Lewis, a spokesperson for California YIMBY (which stands for Yes in My Back Yard), supports Piedmont loosening restrictions on ADUs but said cities should also be repurposing existing buildings to house more people.

‘Every city has the ability to increase the number of homes within its borders,’ Lewis told the Chronicle. ‘We have some of the lowest density cities around and it’s because of the constraints cities have put not just on building but how many homes you can put in a building.’

Advertisement

The backyard cottage craze has come as a result of California passing legislation in 2016 that required cities to approve ADUs if they met parking and size requirements.

Over 31,000 homeowners applied for ADU permits in 2023, up from 7,000 in 2018, state data show.

Rohin Dhar, a San Francisco real estate agent, is skeptical about ADUs and fears they may lead to more complications for people trying to sell their homes

The momentum may only get stronger thanks to two new bills signed by Governor Gavin Newsom last year that allow property owners to sell ADUs separately from their primary home and ban local governments from forcing owners to live in their backyard cottages. 

Even though it’s become all the rage, a San Francisco real estate agent raised serious concerns about ADUs and their potential impact on the housing market.

Rohin Dhar said he sees plenty of single family home owners who build ADUs to rent it out for some extra income. 

Advertisement

The problem comes, he says, when they list their home, especially if there’s a tenant in the additional unit.

‘But when they go to sell the home, it sells for *way less* than if they had never built the ADU,’ he wrote in a post on X. ‘You’re basically selling a single family home with someone living in the in-law unit. That’s a hard sell!’

Another San Francisco real estate agent, Naomi Lempert Lopez, told DailyMail.com that the buyers she interacts with generally react favorably when shown properties with ADUs

Another San Francisco real estate agent, Naomi Lempert Lopez, told DailyMail.com that the buyers she interacts with generally react favorably when shown properties with ADUs

Lopez recommends her clients sell their ADU-equipped home when there's no tenant occupying the additional space to cut down on complications

Lopez recommends her clients sell their ADU-equipped home when there’s no tenant occupying the additional space to cut down on complications

Another San Francisco real estate agent told DailyMail.com that the buyers she interacts with generally react favorably when shown properties with ADUs.

‘For buyers, they open up possibilities with properties vis-à-vis extended guests or additional income,’ Naomi Lempert Lopez said. ‘There’s so much that you could do with an ADU and they add flexibility.’

She also said homes with ADUs sell for more than homes without them, though its important to note that an additional unit adds square footage, which almost by definition would increase the price of a property.

Advertisement

However, Lopez recommends her clients sell their ADU-equipped home when there is no tenant occupying the additional space to cut down on complications. 

‘San Francisco is a city with extremely strong tenant protections, and so anything that is tenant occupied, be it the home, be it the ADU, be it a multi family, that is going to definitely give buyers pause,’ she said.

‘I would definitely say that selling vacant is a much bigger value add.’



Source link

Advertisement

California

Corn tortillas in California now must contain folic acid. More states are looking at it

Published

on

Corn tortillas in California now must contain folic acid. More states are looking at it


Fifteen years after she lost her first baby to a rare and devastating birth defect, Andrea Lopez takes comfort in knowing that other Latina mothers might finally avoid the same pain.

In January, California became the first state to require food makers to add folic acid, a crucial vitamin, to corn masa flour used to make tortillas and other traditional foods widely used in her community.

It’s a long-delayed move aimed at reducing Hispanic infants’ disproportionately high rates of serious conditions called neural tube defects, which claimed Lopez’s son, Gabriel Cude, when he was 10 days old.

“It’s such a small effort for such a tremendous impact,” said Lopez, 44, who lives in Bakersfield and is now a lawyer with two young daughters. “There is very little that I wouldn’t do to spare anybody this heartache.”

Advertisement

A similar law takes effect in Alabama in June, and legislation is pending or being considered in Florida, Georgia, Oklahoma and Oregon. Four more states — Texas, Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania — have expressed “active interest” in the issue, according to the Food Fortification Initiative, an advocacy group that focuses on addressing micronutrient deficiencies.

“All women and children in the United States should have access to folic acid and have healthy babies,” said Scott Montgomery, the group’s director.

Corn masa was excluded from a national mandate

For nearly 30 years, folic acid, a key B vitamin, has been required to be added to enriched wheat and white breads, cereals and pastas in the U.S.

Decades of research show the 1998 requirement cut rates of serious defects such as spina bifida and anencephaly by about 30%, preventing about 1,300 cases a year. It is regarded as one of the top public health triumphs of the 20th century.

But corn masa flour, a staple used in Latino diets, was left out of the original fortification requirement — and rates of conditions such as spina bifida and anencephaly in that community have remained stubbornly high.

Advertisement

In 2016, federal regulators allowed, but did not require, folic acid to be added to corn masa products. By 2023, only about 1 in 7 corn masa flour products and no corn tortillas contained folic acid, a review found.

Higher rates of birth defects among Hispanic moms

Nationwide, Hispanic women have the highest rates of having those defects during pregnancy. In California, the rate among Hispanic mothers is twice as high as for white or Black women, state data show.

California’s new law — and the state’s huge buying power — could help expand its adoption nationwide, said state Assemblymember Joaquin Arambula, who sponsored the legislation passed in 2024.

“You have to be the first oftentimes to get the ball rolling,” he said. “So, I’m glad other states have taken up that mantle.”

California’s action and pressure from advocates have already spurred changes.

Advertisement

Gruma Corp., the parent company of Mission Foods and Azteca Milling, has been involved in the fortification issue for nearly two decades. Azteca began selling some — but not all — varieties of Maseca, its largest brand of corn masa flour, with folic acid in 2016.

As of this year, 97% of the company’s retail sales in the U.S. include folic acid. The rest are expected to be fortified before July, Gruma said in a statement.

Mission Foods began fortification in 2024. It now adds folic acid to all of its branded and private label corn tortillas in the U.S.

Such actions by large producers have helped pave the way for smaller manufacturers to follow suit, according to a recent report by the Center for Science in the Public Interest, a consumer advocacy group that has pushed for fortification.

Initially, the industry was concerned folic acid could affect flavor and the cost of changing labels, said Jim Kabbani, head of the Tortilla Industry Association. But he now expects tortilla makers will start selling fortified products on a broader scale.

Advertisement

“I think overall the train has left the station and it will be more and more states,” he said.

Public health experts cheer the growing momentum.

“The science is clear: Folic acid fortification works,” said Vijaya Kancherla, an Emory University epidemiology professor and director of the Center for Spina Bifida Prevention. “It’s safe. It’s proven. And it’s cost-effective.”

RFK Jr. calls corn masa fortification ‘insanity’

That view contrasts sharply with critics — including some at the highest level of government — who regard fortification of the food supply as a form of government overreach.

Late last year, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. criticized California’s new law in a post on X: “This is insanity. California is waging war against her children — targeting the poor and communities of color,” he wrote.

Advertisement

A spokesman for Kennedy declined to explain the comments.

Social media feeds are rife with people claiming that folic acid fortification is “toxic” or that people with a certain gene variation known as MTHFR can’t properly process the vitamin.

None of those claims is accurate, according to advocates and medical experts.

“What’s truly insane is that our nation’s top health official is spreading false claims and frightening people into avoiding a nutrient that’s proven to prevent birth defects and save babies’ lives,” said Eva Greenthal, CSPI’s senior policy scientist.

At fortification doses, folic acid “has never been shown to harm individuals or populations,” said Dr. Jeffery Blount, a pediatric neurosurgeon at the University of Alabama at Birmingham who works to prevent neural tube defects in the U.S. and globally.

Advertisement

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention emphasizes that “people with the MTHFR gene variant can process all types of folate, including folic acid.”

Even Kennedy’s new federal dietary guidelines support fortification. Documents backing the guidelines advise pregnant women to eat folate-rich foods, such as leafy green vegetables, beans and lentils. But they also acknowledge that folic acid from fortified foods or supplements is “critical” before conception and during early pregnancy to prevent neural tube defects.

“Folic acid fortification of corn masa flour could help prevent” neural tube defects, the CDC website adds.

Without fortification, ‘It’s just too late’

Neural tube defects, which affect about 2,000 babies each year in the U.S., occur in the first weeks after conception, when the tube that forms the spine and brain fails to develop properly.

That’s often before many women realize they’re pregnant. More than 40% of U.S. pregnancies are unintended. In those cases, many women won’t have been preparing for pregnancy, noted Dr. Kimberly BeDell, medical director of a rehabilitation clinic that helps children with spina bifida at Miller Children’s Hospital in Long Beach, California.

Advertisement

“Even women’s best efforts in going to an OB right away and starting prenatal vitamins, it’s just too late,” BeDell said.

Adding folic acid to corn masa, the way it is added to other grains, is a way to ensure the nutrient reaches the wider population that needs it, she added.

At age 28, pregnant with her first child, Andrea Lopez didn’t know about the importance of folic acid or that the vitamin might be missing from her diet.

Then, an ultrasound mid-way through pregnancy showed that her baby had anencephaly, a fatal condition in which the skull fails to develop properly.

Lopez carried the pregnancy to term and Gabriel lived for 10 days. The pain of his loss never goes away, she said, adding that Gabriel would have been a high school freshman this year. She supports California’s law requiring folic acid fortification of corn masa and finds it “mind-boggling” that the action took so long to enforce.

Advertisement

“Trust me, you don’t want to go through this,” she said. “He’s the love of my life. I have two little girls that survived, but he’s my first born. He is my only son.”

___

The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

Central California Women’s Facility Hosts Groundbreaking Film Festival, Showcasing Incarcerated and Formerly Incarcerated Filmmakers – News Releases

Published

on

Central California Women’s Facility Hosts Groundbreaking Film Festival, Showcasing Incarcerated and Formerly Incarcerated Filmmakers – News Releases


WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW: CDCR hosted a first-ever film festival celebrating the work of incarcerated and formerly incarcerated filmmakers inside a women’s correctional facility. The San Quentin Film Festival held its first event outside of San Quentin Rehabilitation Center on March 28, bringing the festival to Central California Women’s Facility (CCWF) in Chowchilla. The event featured screenings of award-winning short films from the 2025 San Quentin Film Festival, followed by a filmmaker panel moderated by comedian and television host W. Kamau Bell. Awards were presented for a Narrative and Documentary Pitch Competition, open exclusively to incarcerated women at CCWF and the California Institution for Women. The event also included a “Women in Film” panel and Q&A, providing incarcerated women insight into the entertainment industry and an opportunity to interact with working professionals in the industry.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

“San Quentin Film Festival at CCWF offers incarcerated participants a powerful platform for self-expression and storytelling, and valuable exposure to the film industry and potential career pathways.”

CDCR Secretary Jeff Macomber

Advertisement

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

BIGGER PICTURE: The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) is committed to rehabilitation and reentry, providing incarcerated people with the tools they need to successfully and safely reenter their communities. The San Quentin Film Festival is an example of this commitment, offering incarcerated filmmakers mentorship and an opportunity to be recognized for their work. Since its inception, participants have leveraged their media experience gained at the festival to pursue careers in the film industry after release, including earning internships and job opportunities.

FILM FESTIVAL DETAILS: The San Quentin Film Festival was created in 2024 by award-winning playwright, screenwriter and author Cori Thomas (Lockdown, When January Feels Like Summer) and formerly incarcerated filmmaker, podcaster and writer Rahsaan “New York” Thomas (Friendly Signs, What These Walls Won’t Hold).

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

“We are deeply moved to be playing a small part in helping to even the playing field for these women. We hope the experience will empower them to tell their own stories and bring their unique perspectives to the table, and that today’s event will lead to additional industry engagement.”

Advertisement

Cori Thomas, SQFF Co-founder and Artistic Director

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Narrative Pitch Competition winner Untitled (Amber) Krysten Webber

Narrative Pitch Competition Winner
Untitled (Amber)
Krysten Webber

Diana Lovejoy, filmmaker of Desert Blossoms

Documentary Pitch Competition Winner
Desert Blossoms
Diana Lovejoy

AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD 

Photos       

B-roll 

Advertisement

CONTACT: CDCR PRESS OFFICE OPEC@CDCR.CA.GOV

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

The race to drop César Chávez’s name has begun. These experts have advice

Published

on

The race to drop César Chávez’s name has begun. These experts have advice


Ten days since sexual abuse allegations were disclosed in a chilling New York Times investigation against farmworkers rights advocate César Chávez, the race to erase his name and likeness from public life is moving at a breakneck pace.

Municipal governments and agencies from the Bay Area to Phoenix, Denver and Texas are removing statues, renaming his holiday (March 31) and cutting mentions from history classes and beyond.

While action has been quick in removing Chávez’s name, there has been plenty of debate on how best to move forward.

A similar process played out a few years back in Burbank, when a student-led investigation propelled the changing of David Starr Jordan Middle School to, coincidentally, farm labor leader Dolores Huerta.

Advertisement

Four years removed, the school’s former principal, Jennifer Meglemre, and a former Burbank Unified Board of Education member, Steve Frintner, have advice for those not sure how to navigate a controversial name change.

Burbank name change background

In early 2018, Jordan student Ixchel Sanchez Jimenez investigated her school’s namesake as part of a class project.

What she found led her and her mother, Laura Jimenez, to push for a name change in May 2018.

Jordan was known for being the founding president of Stanford University and a famed ichthyologist, or fish scientist.

But he was also a believer and supporter of eugenics, a system of controlled breeding and separation of certain people to increase the chances for desirable heritable characteristics. It was a belief espoused by the Nazis.

Advertisement

University of Vermont associate professor and historian Lutz Kaelber estimated that roughly 20,000 people in California deemed undesirable were forcibly sterilized until 1964 due to eugenics policies. Most were sterilized because they were believed to be mentally ill or mentally deficient.

The name-changing process

Burbank Unified set up committees to debate the topic, first to decide whether there should be a name change, and then what the new name should be.

The committees took input from students, teachers, administrators and community members.

Frintner said it was critical not to rush the decision and allow for thorough conversations.

“It’s important to make sure you’re giving people in the community a voice because they want to feel a part of this process,” Frintner said.

Advertisement

After agreeing to drop Jordan, Burbank Unified’s renaming process centered on a few considerations: should the school replace David Starr with another notable Jordan (Texas lawmaker Barbara Jordan), should the school be named after another individual or something less contentious like a tree or a street.

Those decisions mirror the current Chávez debate. Los Angeles is changing César Chávez Day to Farm Worker’s Day, while some advocates, including former farmworkers, are asking that Chávez be replaced with Dolores Huerta, the civil rights leader who fought alongside the man who allegedly raped her.

Resistance to change

Meglemre said resistance to the school name change came from all sides: from those not wanting to drop Jordan and others who did not want the school renamed for a living person.

“The discussions were about how people are flawed and we don’t want to get into a situation where something is named after a person still alive and something terrible ends up happening,” Meglemre said.

After three years of debate, hampered in part by COVID-19, the committee settled on Dolores Huerta. (César Chávez was never a top contender.)

Advertisement

“Almost all the schools in Burbank are named after a person and we wanted to continue that tradition,” Meglemre said.

Frintner said the district committees wanted to choose someone with Southern California ties and was either a minority or a woman.

Last piece of advice

Meglemre said that while there was heated debate and pushback from community members, after a couple of years, most people “moved on with their lives.”

Frintner believes more research is always a positive.

“My advice is make sure you’re doing as much background as possible,” he said. “You do want to honor people but you don’t want to be in a position where you’re having a hard time defending your decisions.”

Advertisement

The week’s biggest stories

(Carlin Stiehl/For The Times)

No Kings Protests

Animal encounters

Theft, fraud allegations

Crime, courts and policing

What else is going on

Must reads

Other meaty reads

For your downtime

 Alfonso "Poncho" Martinez and Evelyn Gregorio of Lugya'h stand for a portrait.

(Juliana Yamada/Los Angeles Times)

Going out

Staying in

L.A. Timeless

A selection of the very best reads from The Times’ 143-year archive.

Have a great day, from the Essential California team

Jim Rainey, staff reporter
Hugo Martín, assistant editor, fast break desk
Kevinisha Walker, multiplatform editor
Andrew J. Campa, weekend writer
Karim Doumar, head of newsletters

Advertisement

How can we make this newsletter more useful? Send comments to essentialcalifornia@latimes.com. Check our top stories, topics and the latest articles on latimes.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending