Connect with us

California

California hikes costs for flood protections in farm country

Published

on

California hikes costs for flood protections in farm country


Local weather change is worsening the already important risk of flooding in California’s farm nation, and state officers mentioned Thursday that as a lot as $30 billion could also be wanted over three many years to guard the area, a rise from 5 years in the past.

Each 5 years, flood safety plans are up to date for the Central Valley, the place about 1.3 million folks reside in danger in floodplains. State officers launched a draft of the newest replace that requires investing in levees, upkeep and multi-benefit tasks that recharge aquifers and assist wildlife whereas enhancing flood safety.

The investments are mandatory to guard a rising area the place local weather change is anticipated to worsen the possibility of heavy rains and flooding, particularly for the San Joaquin river basin.

“Local weather change is now not the long run boogeyman that it as soon as was. It’s right here,” mentioned Kristopher Tjernell, deputy director of built-in watershed administration on the California Division of Water Sources.

Advertisement

The price of upkeep and new building elevated partly attributable to these adjustments and a greater understanding of what’s wanted, in line with the draft.

The 2017 flood plan replace known as for $17 billion to $21 billion in investments over three many years. Since that replace, about $4.4 billion has been allotted.

The most recent draft mentioned the necessity is now $25 billion to $30 billion over the approaching 30 years. These investments, nevertheless, will save lives and property, in line with the plan.

The Central Valley is within the state’s inside and consists of cities like Sacramento and Fresno. It is usually dwelling to a $17 billion agricultural financial system. Whereas the hurricane-prone Gulf Coast could also be extra related to catastrophic flooding, the Central Valley is at important danger.

In 2017, extreme climate compelled officers to make use of the emergency spillway at Oroville Dam, about 75 miles (120 kilometers) north of Sacramento. Water tumbling over the spillway brought on erosion, and practically 200,000 folks had been briefly evacuated as a precaution.

Advertisement

California is fighting drought and this spring continues to be dry. Snowpack is properly beneath common, reservoirs are low, and officers concern a foul wildfire season. However not having sufficient rain and snow now doesn’t imply flood danger has gone away, mentioned Nicholas Pinter who researches watersheds on the College of California Davis.

“These updates are normally about sustaining curiosity in flooding,” particularly throughout a multiyear drought, Painter mentioned. It is crucial to not neglect issues even when they aren’t instantly occurring, he mentioned.

Discovering sufficient cash is a problem, in line with the draft. State funds are inadequate and it’s tough to steer native communities to pay sufficient for flood administration, in line with the plan. Alternatives to seize extra federal {dollars} are rising, nevertheless.

Officers mentioned combating local weather change requires tasks that do extra than simply forestall floods. Permitting floodwaters to unfold out also can assist recharge aquifers and enhance habitat.

“It’s one large watershed, and now we have to be working collectively,” mentioned Julie Rentner, president of the conservation group River Companions.

Advertisement

Rentner mentioned the plan calls for extra spending on multi-benefit tasks exhibiting that officers are taking them critically.

The plan additionally requires monitoring efficiency and guaranteeing deprived areas are correctly protected, in line with the draft.

The general public can submit feedback on the draft via early June. The Central Valley Flood Safety Board is chargeable for reviewing the feedback and adopting the replace.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

Laura Richardson completes a political comeback, winning tight race to represent South L.A. in the California Capitol

Published

on

Laura Richardson completes a political comeback, winning tight race to represent South L.A. in the California Capitol


Laura Richardson emerged the victor of the competitive, costly and feisty election to win a South Los Angeles seat in the state Senate — completing her political comeback more than 10 years after a tumultuous tenure in the House of Representatives.

Richardson narrowly won the race against Michelle Chambers, a community justice advocate who faced accusations of misconduct in prior public office. The Associated Press called the race Friday after weeks of ballot counting.

The contest between two Democrats with similar social policies but differing views on crime and business attracted huge spending by special interests.

Independent expenditure committees poured more than $7.6 million into the race, making it the most expensive election for state Legislature this year, according to California Target Book, a political database. Negative campaigning dominated the race as business interests and labor unions battled for their favored candidate.

Advertisement

Richardson, a moderate Democrat, will join a Democratic supermajority in the Legislature. But Republicans are on track to flip three legislative seats this year, one in the Senate and two in the Assembly.

Richardson’s biggest supporters were businesses, including PACs funded by oil companies, and law enforcement associations that said they advocated for candidates who shared their beliefs on free enterprise and public safety. Meanwhile, Chambers’ biggest portion of support came from healthcare workers and teachers unions, who spent millions of dollars backing her.

Chambers wrote in a statement she was “proud of the campaign we ran,” thanking supporters who canvassed, phone-banked or cast votes for her “vision of better jobs, better wages and a California that works for everybody, not just the wealthy and well-connected.”

“This was the closest state senate race in the state, but unfortunately it appears that we will fall just short of victory,” she added. “Our people-powered efforts were not quite enough to overcome millions of dollars in outside spending on lies from the oil and tobacco industry and their allies.“

Richardson will succeed Sen. Steven Bradford (D-Gardena) in the 35th District, which encompasses the cities of Carson, Compton and stretches down to the harbor. Bradford, who had endorsed Chambers, said he believed both candidates were “qualified to do the job.”

Advertisement

Bradford, who championed reparations legislation during his tenure, hoped the future senator would be “willing to meet with all factions of the community, because it’s a great diverse need in this district.”

“I’m also deeply sad to see how negative this campaign was, probably one of the most negative campaigns I’ve experienced in my 30-plus years of being involved with elections,” he said. “I just hope that we can come together after such a negative campaign, regardless of who the victor is, and understand that we have to work together.”

Richardson and Chambers took aim at each other’s past controversies. For Chambers, who had picked up the endorsement of various state and local elected officials, opposition groups seized on a criminal misdemeanor charge from 30 years ago. She was also accused of bullying and intimidation from her time as a Compton City Council member, allegations that she has repeatedly denied.

Richardson faced criticism over her tenure in Congress, where a House Ethics Committee investigation found her guilty in 2012 of compelling congressional staff to work on her campaign. The committee report also accused Richardson of obstructing the committee investigation “through the alteration or destruction of evidence” and “the deliberate failure to produce documents.”

Richardson admitted to wrongdoing, according to the report, and accepted a reprimand and $10,000 fine for the violations. She previously said that during her time in Congress, Republicans frequently targeted members of the Black Caucus. After she lost her reelection bid for a fourth term, Richardson said she worked at an employment firm to improve her managerial skills and has recognized previous mistakes.

Advertisement

“It’s been said voters are very forgiving, and if you stand up and you accept responsibility and you improve in the work that you do — we need people who’ve been through things, who understand what it’s like to have had difficulties,” she previously told The Times. “And so that’s exactly what I did. I didn’t shy away from it.”



Source link

Continue Reading

California

72-hour rain totals across Northern California

Published

on

72-hour rain totals across Northern California


72-hour rain totals across Northern California – CBS Sacramento

Watch CBS News


Here is a look at how much rain has accumulated across Northern California as of Friday night.

Advertisement

Be the first to know

Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

California

Magnitude 3.5 earthquake recorded in Malibu, California Friday afternoon

Published

on

Magnitude 3.5 earthquake recorded in Malibu, California Friday afternoon


An earthquake shook along the Southern California coast Friday afternoon.

The earthquake reportedly occurred in Malibu, west of Los Angeles, at 2:15 p.m. local time, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.

The temblor, which was recorded at a depth of nearly 6 miles, measured a preliminary magnitude of 3.5.

It was not immediately clear if there was any damage.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending