The 34th Alaska Legislature has three schools of thought on public education. One supports a large funding increase for the Base Student Allocation (BSA) and nothing else. Most who started out in this camp are still there. They believe that a lack of money is the reason for the dreadful academic proficiency outcomes in Alaska.

A second camp formed around policy reforms. They observed how transformative the Reads Act has been in improving student outcomes for K-3 students and the success of charter schools. But many of these policy reform advocates recognized that schools were facing inflationary impacts and high healthcare costs. And they realized some of the reforms to improve academics would require additional funding. So a third camp was born. This camp sees a need for a funding increase, some aimed toward the BSA and some aimed toward policy reforms.

Most people in the second camp have moved to this third camp. A few from the first camp have joined as well to begin a debate about what dollar increase to the BSA would be affordable.

With the guidance of the Senate Finance Committee co-chairs, the majority of the third camp coalesced around a BSA increase of $680 and a series of policy reforms. They include banning student cellphones in school; streamlined and open processes for establishing charter schools; reading incentives; family choice across school and district boundaries; targeted career and technical education funds for high schools; teacher retention incentives; and counting all students as a one whole student in the funding formula, ending a practice of counting some at 90%.

Now let’s talk about funding. Districts need an increase that can be sustained. The $1,000 increase that the NEA is pushing is not affordable this year due to oil prices and is not sustainable in future years.

The NEA has a problem. If it really wanted to make sure the school districts had enough funding for teachers, it makes no sense that it has pushed back instead of strongly advocating for districts to opt into the AlaskaCare state health plan pool, which would free up more than $100 million.

If they cared about students, they would have embraced instead of opposed giving teachers retention lump sum payments, teacher spending accounts and teacher incentives for student improvement. They would not oppose requiring that certain funds be spent on teachers and instruction instead of administration. These are all ideas that have been offered as amendments. The NEA has opposed them, and districts have lost out.

We believe the NEA is pushing the $1,000 increase because they are about a system, not about students.

The people supporting a reasonable funding increase plus new education policies this year are most likely to get a successful education bill across the finish line, into law, and funded.

Sadly, instead, the Senate and House Majorities have walked away and struck out on their own, pushing for a large BSA increase. The governor’s veto on Tuesday was predictable.

This is not how we should be conducting business on behalf of Alaskans. Without the help of the minorities, a bill not succeed. The majorities know this.

They know they need agreement with the minorities in order for an education bill to ultimately be successful. The majorities passing an unaffordable and unsustainable large BSA-only bill was a political stunt.

Financial support for schools is only rhetoric if it’s not paired with action that will hold. We urge those who are serious about helping our students to embrace policy reforms and a sustainable increase to the BSA.

Sen. Mike Cronk of Northway is a retired teacher and a Republican who represents District R.

Sen. Shelley Hughes of Wasilla is a Republican who represents District M.

• • •

The views expressed here are the writer’s and are not necessarily endorsed by the Anchorage Daily News, which welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, email commentary(at)adn.com. Send submissions shorter than 200 words to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Read our full guidelines for letters and commentaries here.

PHOENIX (AZFamily) — Warm and dry conditions continue for much of Arizona, but a few weather changes are on tap for the state as we get closer to the weekend.

Look for a high of 91 degrees in the Valley today under sunny skies. That’s four degrees above average for this time of year in Phoenix, but also four degrees cooler than yesterday’s afternoon high of 95 degrees.

Winds will stay light in the Valley for most of today, but could be slightly more breezy this afternoon thanks to a trough of low pressure moving across the Great Basin. A stronger storm system is expected to move onshore from the Pacific and bring bigger changes by the end of the week.

As low pressure moves onshore Friday, winds are expected to pick up across Arizona both Friday and Saturday. Since no rain or snow is expected for Arizona, fire danger will be high with elevated winds and no moisture. We may see Red Flag Warnings and Wind Advisories issued in the coming days for the weekend.

The storm is expected to stay well to the north of Arizona as it moves across the Great Basin. Aside from the winds, the other main impact for our state will be a cool down. Expect afternoon highs in the low 90s through Friday, with upper 80s expected Saturday and low 80s on Sunday.

Next week will start in the mid 80s, but a big warm-up is likely by the end of the next week. We’ll keep you posted as we get closer.

See a spelling or grammatical error in our story? Please click here to report it.

Do you have a photo or video of a breaking news story? Send it to us here with a brief description.

Copyright 2025 KTVK/KPHO. All rights reserved.

To the editor: Many thanks to staff writer Melody Peterson for this great article (“Former Edison executive Calderon, now a lawmaker, seeks to cut rooftop solar credits,” April 21). I’m one of many who installed solar panels and batteries at the request of the state. At the time, I was doing home dialysis and any electrical outage would have been a health hazard. Now I have a system that puts power back onto the utility’s grid most days and they want to go back on the legal agreement we signed with them. That’s not right.

Richard Lass, Oceano, Calif.

..

To the editor: Thank you for your article on Assembly Bill 942. It is high time somebody told the truth about what the utility companies are trying to do to the people who trusted the state’s promises to provide credits if they added rooftop solar to their homes. Our grid has been in trouble for a long time and solar customers have been called on to lessen the load. Now, due to the utilities’ mismanagement and high payments to stockholders, they are trying to pass the bill on to those who have already paid. I am deeply disappointed in our governor for buying into their plan. If there is any justice, AB 942 will fail.

Lynda Schiff, Santa Maria, Calif.

..

To the editor: From the article: “The bill’s author, Assemblymember Lisa Calderon (D-Whittier), is a former executive at Southern California Edison and its parent company, Edison International.” Nothing more needs to be said.

Trent D. Sanders, La Cañada Flintridge