Arizona
How an Arizona school’s response to a perceived gun threat upended a 12-year-old’s life
Geighe Garcia arrived at his elementary school in Winslow on a Friday last April to what he described as a flood of police cars.
“It was just flooded with police officer cars,” said Geighe, 13. “Just flooded all the way around.”
Alarmed, he turned around and walked home.
“I was like, ‘Hell no, dude, there must have been something really bad that’s gone on,’” Geighe said. “I was scared. I thought somebody got shot or something.”
But when he got home and told his mom what happened — “I don’t know what’s going on; there’s cop cars all around the school,” he recalled saying — she repeated what she’d tried to tell him earlier that morning as he’d rushed out the door.
“‘Someone said that you were gonna shoot the school, Geighe,’” he recalled her saying.
That was April 14, 2023. In the year that followed, Geighe’s life was turned upside down.
The threat Geighe was accused of making — by kids he said were bullying him — was not found credible. Still, he was excluded from months of in-person learning, including his first semester of middle school.
His experience offers a window into the pressure schools are under to take a hard line on perceived threats of gun violence — and the impact schools’ reactions can have on students.
Student’s dream about school shooting leads to real-life accusations
On April 13, the principal of Geighe’s school called the Winslow Police Department after a parent reported that Geighe had threatened to shoot students and staff.
After receiving the call from the principal of Washington Elementary about 6:30 p.m., the police department sent officers to Geighe’s house to speak with him and his mom, Consuelo Garcia. Geighe denied making threats against anyone and “stated he was talking about video games,” according to the police report.
Consuelo said she didn’t get the impression the police visit was serious.
“The officers were so nonchalant about it,” she said.
Consuelo told the officers they didn’t have firearms, and the officers didn’t ask to search the house for weapons, she said.
Consuelo and Geighe, she said, just spoke to officers outside, “and that was it.”
“They had asked what happened earlier, if there was an incident earlier at school, and we were both like, ‘No, nothing happened,’” Consuelo said. An officer then told them that there were concerns that Geighe had made a statement that he was going to harm teachers, to which Geighe responded that he didn’t say anything like that, Consuelo recalled.
The next day — the day of the flood of police cars outside the school — officers went to Washington Elementary to speak with three students who said Geighe had made the threats.
According to the police report, several of Geighe’s schoolmates had been discussing a dream that one of them had about a shooting in their school. The student who had the dream indicated that the shooter looked like Geighe but didn’t say his name. At the time, they were coming in from recess.
Geighe, who had been standing nearby, then approached them and named a student and a teacher who would be first on his list if he were to shoot up the school, three students separately told officers from the Winslow Police Department. According to the police report, one of the students said they laughed it off at the time but “were weirded out.”
Guns at school: A boy bringing an assault rifle to high school shook this Phoenix district into action
The parent who reported the incident told police that she did not want Geighe to “get into any trouble” but rather thought he “needed some kind of help.” When asked if she wanted to pursue charges, she declined.
Geighe, who was 12 and in sixth grade at the time, denied making any of those comments.
“I know it’s not funny at all to say that you’re going to shoot people,” Geighe said in an interview with The Arizona Republic. “It’s not cool at all.”
When he found out the students said he made those comments, “it felt like someone just threw me into prison, right then and there,” he said.
Principal recommends long-term suspension
Geighe was immediately given a nine-day out-of-school suspension and a thick packet of work to do at home. But he never completed it — he said it was work he had already done while he was at school, which frustrated him.
“I told myself … I’m not going to redo it because it makes no sense,” he said.
During the nine-day suspension, Geighe and Consuelo were informed that a hearing would take place to put Geighe on a long-term suspension for violating the district’s student conduct policy.
The policy states that students “shall not engage in improper behavior,” then lists examples of improper behavior, which include “threat of harm to any person on District owned or controlled property” and “conduct or speech that violates commonly accepted standards of the District and that, under the circumstances, has no redeeming social value.” Any student that violates the policies “may be subject to discipline up to expulsion.”
That policy mirrors the model policy provided by the Arizona School Boards Association, which offers advice to districts across the state.
The Washington Elementary principal recommended to the district’s superintendent that Geighe be given a 180-day suspension — the length of a full school year — citing eight previous write-ups during Geighe’s time in the district that were labeled as “aggression” and stating that long-term suspension was necessary because he had made a threat about students and staff, according to a copy of the letter provided by Consuelo.
In the letter, the principal also noted that Geighe worked with a paraprofessional at school to help with his emotional issues and added that Geighe had made several statements that year about issues he had with students and family.
According to a discipline summary provided by Consuelo, Geighe’s eight incidents labeled “aggression” were classified as minor aggressive acts. Each resulted in a detention, a warning or suspended privileges. All except one took place in 2018 or earlier, when Geighe was in kindergarten, first and second grade. The exception was at the beginning of fifth grade, more than a year and a half before the April incident.
Geighe acknowledged that he had disciplinary issues in the past, stemming from anger issues that came from problems at home and bullying at school, he said. He’d been working on it and thought things had been getting better: He had been attending counseling outside of school for about five years, and in fifth grade he started regularly volunteering at a nearby church packing food boxes. “I’m really glad I’ve changed,” he said.
“I had … thoughts of what would happen if I kept going down this road,” Geighe said. “I told myself, ‘What would this do to mom?’ ‘What would dad say?’ What would grandma say?’”
Consuelo said, “I think church had a lot to do with it, too.”
The students who alleged Geighe named a student and teacher he would shoot had been consistently bullying him for two years, he said.
“It’s every day, constant,” Geighe said. “They’d pick on everybody, but mostly it’d be me because I have anger issues, and they just always want to get a reaction out of me.”
“That’s why I usually stay around teachers,” Geighe said. “It’s just constant bullying and bullying. And then as soon as I do anything about it, then I get in trouble somehow.”
He often visited the school’s paraprofessional when he needed to cool down. There, he could do schoolwork, use stress toys and work on calming techniques like counting to 10, he said.
“He keeps it kind of dark, but he puts on a light in front of you. He’s really nice about it. … It’s actually really cool,” Geighe said.
“It’s just like a place to escape,” he said. “He also does help you out a lot.”
‘Ill-advised comments’: Conclusions reached about alleged threat
Consuelo was told in a letter dated April 24 that she had the right to obtain legal representation for Geighe’s long-term suspension hearing, set for the morning of April 28.
The letter requested Consuelo let the school know at least two working days before the hearing whether Geighe would be represented by counsel. “But I still don’t know where I was supposed to get it from,” Consuelo said. They went to the hearing without a legal advocate.
The hearing officer — who essentially plays the role of a judge — acknowledged in his decision that Geighe, under oath, denied making any of the comments the students said he made, according to a copy of the hearing officer’s letter provided by Consuelo. He also acknowledged that Geighe merely joined a conversation already in progress about a school shooting dream rather than initiating it.
But he determined that it was “more likely than not” that Geighe had made the comments because he thought it unlikely that the students would have given separate statements to the police officer that were “strikingly similar” if they were untrue.
Still, the hearing officer wrote in his decision that what Geighe was alleged to have said was likely not a credible threat.
He cited the police report — the officer “stated in his report that no charges would be filed against Geighe, presumably because there was not sufficient credible evidence of an actual threat,” he wrote.
“I would agree that it is more likely that Geighe might have made some ill-advised comments about the dream, rather than actually proposing a plan of his intent to harm others,” the hearing officer continued.
But he recommended Geighe be suspended for the rest of the school year and for “a period of time less than through the remainder of the 2023-24 school year.”
The comments the other students alleged Geighe said were “inappropriate and resulted in student and parent unease, as well as a heightened police presence on campus after the incident,” he wrote. “This demonstrates the seriousness with which school administrators must view real or perceived threats made to or about others on campus.”
Due process for students ‘isn’t always clear,’ legal expert says
All students who face suspension from public schools across the country are entitled to due process, according to Diana Newmark, an associate clinical professor at the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law.
“But what that actually means isn’t always clear,” she said. State law usually provides more detailed information, but in Arizona, there are not many mandated requirements, she said.
Arizona law requires school districts to provide notice and a hearing for any student suspended for more than 10 days and says that suspensions can only be imposed for “good cause.” But how and why suspensions are given out often depends on policies established by a school district’s governing board, Newmark said.
Newmark leads the Education Advocacy Clinic at the University of Arizona law school, which provides free counsel for students at suspension and expulsion hearings in the Tucson area. Usually, students in Arizona are allowed to be represented by counsel at disciplinary hearings, she said. But she said it can be difficult for families to find representation because of how quickly hearings happen.
“It’s really enormously difficult for families to find an attorney who’s available at short notice,” Newmark said. If they can find someone, it’s often hard for families to afford representation, she said.
School discipline hearings also are unlikely to have the hallmarks of due process that one might expect in a court of law. A hearing, for example, might be based entirely on hearsay, Newmark said.
“There might not actually be a witness to the events at the hearing who saw what happened or knew directly what happened,” she said.
In her experience, schools in Arizona typically don’t identify who the witnesses are. “A student can’t challenge, necessarily … if they don’t even know who it is who’s making an accusation,” she said.
The hearing officer is also not necessarily a neutral party like a judge — they are often someone from within the school district, Newmark said.
Winslow Unified officials said they do not comment on discipline of specific students, citing the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act. But Jennifer Sanderlin, the administrative secretary to the superintendent and governing board, said the district takes alleged gun threats “extremely seriously.”
Once a principal is notified, officials begin an investigation and inform the superintendent, a school resource officer or the local police department, according to Sanderlin. Students, staff and other involved parties are interviewed, and the principal “makes a plan of next steps.”
Washington Elementary’s 2023-24 student handbook states that for the first incident of harassment or threats — along with verbal abuse, ethnic slurs, bullying and slander — the minimum discipline can be a detention, while the maximum can be a recommendation of expulsion. Threats are defined in the handbook as a “statement of action which intimidates or indicates future injury to another person.” According to the handbook, “school threats” have a minimum discipline recommendation of a long-term suspension.
Newmark said schools will sometimes impose suspensions for statements where there’s no intent to harm anyone.
“The question is really whether something is a true threat,” she said. “Maybe it’s a child or a teenager blowing off steam,” making a bad joke or engaging in dark humor.
Sometimes, she said, a school understands students aren’t making a real threat of harm but still disciplines them.
“Schools are going to take potential threats of violence seriously,” Newmark said. “They might respond with police presence or other security. And so, given this, schools might really be tempted to discipline a student who makes that kind of threatening statement even if there’s no actual intent to harm anyone.”
‘Just so hurtful’: First semester of middle school lost to suspension
A couple of weeks after Geighe’s long-term suspension began, Consuelo enrolled him in an online school she saw an ad for on Facebook. She didn’t want him to fall behind, and the school district doesn’t give work to students on a long-term suspension, according to Sanderlin, the Winslow Unified administrative secretary. Alternative in-person options were slim: aside from Winslow Unified, which is the only public school district in the city, there’s one private Christian school.
But enrolling Geighe in online school broke Consuelo’s heart, she said. It made her sad to think about what he would lose as he missed the in-person transition to middle school: sports, extracurriculars, field days, spirit weeks, more engagement with his classmates and teachers. “That’s a big step up,” she said.
“For this opportunity to be taken from him and to be left with a computer in front of him is just so hurtful,” Consuelo said. “It’s not like he can get that back.”
In October, she said it was a “struggle” to get Geighe out of bed in the morning to do his online schoolwork, whereas before, she would have no trouble waking him up for school. “There’s no more light in his eyes for school anymore at all,” she said.
According to Newmark, a long-term suspension can affect a child in several ways, most immediately through lost learning opportunities and disengagement with the school community. There are also the pressures that having a child at home can have on parents and caregivers, she said. And research has consistently shown that “long-term suspensions and expulsions correlate with a host of negative life outcomes, like higher rates of incarceration and an overall lowered earning potential,” she said.
Geighe said that online school was “not that bad.” It took up about 30 minutes of his day each day, and he spent his free time doing chores around the house, visiting his grandparents and playing basketball with his two closest friends at a nearby park after they got out of school.
But he said the online school was just giving him the basics. Consuelo agreed: “He’s really smart. I think he needs to be challenged,” she said. “He’s not challenged with this online at all.”
And Geighe missed seeing teachers in person and having something to keep him busy.
“I just like being there,” he said in October.
The school district agreed that Geighe could return in early January, roughly nine months after being suspended.
As the start date crept closer, Geighe was nervous. After all, he would be starting at an entirely new school halfway through the seventh grade.
“The other kids, they got a head start from me because I didn’t go to the first day of school,” he said. “I don’t have the first day or the second day. I don’t know where the bathrooms are. I don’t know where anything is.”
He worried that he might be held back and anticipated being crowded by classmates with questions about where he was, which he planned to respond to with a joke about having been out of the country.
Still, he said, he was going to try his best. And he was excited, too. “I just want to be inside the school,” he said. “I just like the new school feeling.”
‘I really missed it’: Back in school after nearly nine months away
The first few months of middle school were hard for Geighe — homework, especially. “All the kids, they had a preview,” he said in early April. “They just threw me in.”
And it was hard to see the kids he had issues with before he was suspended. He avoided them, he said. “I just tell them, ‘Leave me alone,’ because I’m not trying to get in another situation like this again,” he said.
He missed a few days in March, which prompted a call from the school. He was exhausted and struggling to eat and sleep, but he didn’t really know why. “I was really out of it,” he said. “Stress, I guess.”
But by April, Geighe started feeling excited to go to school again. Homework was still hard, but he became comfortable asking his teachers questions at school. He started waking up on time by himself. He began attending tutoring twice a week after school, and he started volunteering weekly at church again. His favorite subjects are now math and science — he likes being challenged, he said.
“I really missed it,” he said. “I don’t want to wake up at 12 o’clock all over again, every single day, for forever.”
Going to school “makes me feel really good,” he said.
“I still have to make a 100% recovery, but — my best guess — I’m at 50% at this point,” he said.
Reach the reporter at mparrish@arizonarepublic.com.
Arizona
No. 21 Arizona GymCats open Big 12 competition with 1st regular season win over ASU since 2016
TEMPE—The No. 21 Arizona GymCats last defeated rival Arizona State during the regular season on Feb. 22, 2016. They also outscored the Sun Devils in the 2017 Pac-12 Championships. It’s been all ASU since then.
Those days are over. Arizona defeated ASU by almost a full point. The final score was 196.650 to 195.725, a huge gap in NCAA gymnastics. It was a huge opportunity for the program, and the GymCats seized it.
“Dual meets, it’s really hard (to win),” Arizona head coach John Court said. “We knew that to come up here in this environment…that we needed to do our best performance. We went 24 for 24, which was great. We had season highs in three of the events, which you got to play at your best on the biggest stage. And we went ESPN2 live across the country and showed our program off. That is amazing. You don’t get a lot of opportunities like that to show the A across the nation for women’s gymnastics. Get your first Big 12 win. Get a Territorial Cup point.”
ASU has not had a strong start to its season. The Devils came in ranked lower than Arizona in bars and beam, both by significant amounts. On floor exercise, ASU is ranked 25th to Arizona’s 26th. On vault, the advantage was No. 26 to No. 33. That had the Devils ranked No. 34 overall, well behind their in-state rivals.
Arizona took the lead from the jump, going up 49.175 to 48.825 after the first rotation and never looking back. The GymCats broke 49 points on all four rotations. ASU had a 49+ on bars and beam but was below the mark on floor and vault.
Vault was a deciding factor in the meet. In the past, the GymCats often gave up several tenths on the event because they don’t perform any vaults that start from a 10.0. This year, it was an even match as ASU performed a slate of 9.95 vaults, as well.
Arizona had five vaults that scored at least 9.800. Even the low score of 9.775 is often a score the GymCats would keep. On Sunday afternoon, it was the score they dropped. Meanwhile, the Sun Devils had just two vaults break 9.800. Arizona sophomore Abigayle Martin won the event with a 9.875.
“We don’t have any 10.0 vaults so we have to be clean and we have to land,” said Arizona assistant coach Shelby Martinez. “I think knowing that we are at a disadvantage because our ceiling is lower than every other event that we do, but that’s okay. It doesn’t have to be a disadvantage to our total team score. It’s just important going in. We know what we have to do.”
Martin is one of three GymCats performing the all-around this season and has really taken to the role. She finished third of five gymnasts with a 39.325 on Sunday but gave Arizona scores it could use on all four events.
“I love it,” Martin said. “It’s definitely been my dream since I was a kid, to come in and do everything in college. So that’s been great. I actually prefer it to last year, when I would did like two or three, because there’s no waiting. It’s just go, go, go. And I think that that’s great for me because it’s less time to think. And I’m someone who does better just kind of being relaxed and settling in and going.”
Senior Emily Mueller won the all-around for the second time this season. She did it with a career-high 39.425. The 9.775 on vault was her lowest score of the day. She went for a 9.825 or better on the other three events and won the balance beam with a career-high score of 9.925.
The beam was where Arizona put a bow on its wire-to-wire victory. The teams went into the final rotation with Arizona leading 147.375 to 147.000. After both leadoff gymnasts went 9.800, ASU ran into its first problem.
Sun Devil gymnast Sarah Clark scored 9.450. With Gianna Lenczner scoring 9.775 on the beam for Arizona, it was imperative that the Sun Devils drop that score.
Things got more difficult when Mueller put up her 9.925 in the third spot. On floor, ASU responded with a 9.775 from Halle Braaflat, its third gymnast.
Another huge setback followed for ASU. Lilia Purler stepped out of bounds on one of her tumbling passes and ended with a 9.600. While there was still a possibility of dropping Clark’s 9.450, it meant that Purler’s score would have to count.
Things got even better for Arizona with its fourth gymnast on beam. Sophomore Tirzah Wise, who was inserted into the beam lineup for the first time in her career last week, scored a 9.900.
“When Emily went 9.95, that was big,” Court said. “Tirzah going 9.9, too. Career high, career high, back to back. It was a great way to close out the competition.”
When Kimberly Smith scored a 9.700 on floor and Martin countered with a 9.850 on beam, the meet was essentially over. Elena Deets didn’t have her best routine to anchor the beam for Arizona, but she made it mathematically impossible for ASU’s Emily White to score high enough for the Sun Devils to overtake the GymCats.
The GymCats got season highs on every event except floor exercise. Their overall score was also a season high.
Arizona improves to 7-1 on the season and moves up to No. 20 in the rankings. While overall records are not hugely important in college gymnastics, being 1-0 in the Big 12 and landing in the top 20 nationally are important.
Conference standings determine which teams will be in the second session of the league championships at the end of the year. That session tends to get bigger scores even when routines are similar to those performed in the early session. The average of certain season scores will determine which 36 teams advance to NCAA Regionals.
“I think it means everything, and I think that this team is so invested in one another and invested in Arizona gymnastics that it just makes perfect sense,” Martin said. “Like, why not us? I think that coming into the year, we knew that this one would be a harder one. I think we have an underclassmen-dominant class. There’s 12 freshmen and sophomores, so we knew that we’d really have to bond together to come and do something like this. And it’s really great to see us come together and win.”
Lead photo courtesy of Arizona Athletics
Arizona
How to watch Iowa State men’s basketball at Arizona: TV channel, prediction
Big Monday on ESPN will feature Iowa State in action against Arizona.
The Cyclones (17-2, 7-1) made it two straight with a 76-61 victory over Arizona State this past weekend, keeping the momentum going after putting up 108 points vs. UCF.
Curtis Jones scored a career-high 33 points while Joshua Jefferson had yet another double-double. Jones averages just under 18 points per game while Jefferson sits at 13 points and eight rebounds.
Arizona (13-6, 7-1) has been on fire since Big 12 play started, reeling off nine wins in 10 games after starting the season 4-5. That includes back-to-back victories over Oklahoma State and Colorado.
Caleb Love leads the way at 15.6 points per game with two others in double figures.
ESPN’s BPI gives the Wildcats a 58 percent chance to win.
Here are details on how to watch Iowa State’s contest at Arizona on Monday, Jan. 27:
Who: Iowa State at Arizona in men’s Big 12 Conference basketball action
When: 9:30 p.m. CT | Monday, January 27
Where: McKale Memorial Center | Tucson, Arizona
Live Stream: Stream Iowa State at Arizona live on fuboTV (Start your free trial)
TV Channel: ESPN
Our Prediction: Iowa State 80, Arizona 74
Live Updates, Highlights: Follow the game on Iowa State on SI for live updates, in-game analysis and big-play highlights.
Arizona
Bird Droppings: Arizona Cardinals best plays of the season, QB Coach gets OC interview and more
Happy Championship Sunday one and all.
The Arizona Cardinals are at home, but there is plenty of news from around the web to help us keep up with what is going on with the team, let’s get to it.
Top 10 defensive plays for the Arizona Cardinals in 2024
Baker’s fourth-down stop labeled first on list
You’ve Got Mail: Championship Weekend Awaits
Topics include backup QBs, best photos of the year, and getting more YAC
After Year Out, BJ Ojulari Ready To Make Run At Pass Rush Again
Linebacker regains optimism after knee injury
Arizona Cardinals opponents set for 2025 schedule, including home games against Packers, Falcons, Panthers
Home schedule includes Packers, Falcons, Jaguars
Devin Fitzgerald appears in Cardinals video highlighting father Larry Fitzgerald’s huge 2008 playoff performance
Son Devin Fitzgerald makes appearance in new video
An International Opportunity For Cardinals. Maybe
Colts, among Arizona’s opponents in 2025, get Germany game
One-Time Cardinal Darren Mougey Chosen As New Jets GM
Had brief turn in Arizona as wide receiver
Cardinals Cover 2 – The Value Of The Ball
Ep. 844 – It’s something Jonathan Gannon says all the time. And based on what we saw during the divisional round of the playoffs, the head coach is right. The ball matters. Specifically, taking the ball away and protecting the ball. Turnover margin is imp
Big Red Rage – Former Cardinals Great Bertrand Berry Helps Celebrate 700th Show
Ep. 700 – Bertrand Berry, former NFL pass rusher and five-year host of the Big Red Rage, joins Paul Calvisi and Ron Wolfley to celebrate our 700th episode. Berry recalls his time on the show and talks about his favorite moments as a member of the Cardinal
Arizona Cardinals Scores, Stats and Highlights – ESPN
Visit ESPN for Arizona Cardinals live scores, video highlights, and latest news. Find standings and the full 2024 season schedule.
Cardinals turning toward offseason to build off 2024 – ESPN
Arizona will focus on figuring out how to win more games next season after finishing 8-9 in 2024.
Cardinals’ youth movement could really pay off in 2025
The Arizona Cardinals have made a concerted effort to develop their younger players since organizational changes in 2023. Will it pay off in 2025?
Marvin Harrison Jr. not NFL Rookie of the Year finalist
Arizona Cardinals receiver Marvin Harrison Jr. was not among the five finalists for the 2024 NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year award.
Jalon Walker falls to Cardinals in Jeremiah’s NFL mock draft
Jalon Walker, a linebacker from Georgia, fell to the Arizona Cardinals at No. 16 in NFL Network analyst Daniel Jeremiah’s first mock draft.
Report: Bears request to interview Cardinals QB coach Israel Woolfork
The Chicago Bears have reportedly requested to interview Cardinals quarterbacks coach Israel Woolfork for their offensive coordinator job.
Jets agree to terms with Broncos exec Darren Mougey as GM
The New York Jets have reportedly agreed to terms with Valley native and Denver Broncos assistant general manager Darren Mougey to be their GM.
San Francisco 49ers welcome back Robert Saleh to be DC
The Cardinals will have to face Robert Saleh’s defenses again with the 49ers as he returns to the job he had from 2017-2020.
LB Baron Browning named free agent Cardinals can’t afford to lose
PFF believes the Cardinals can’t afford to lose linebacker Baron Browning in free agency.
Bears request interview with Israel Woolfork for vacant OC job
Cardinals OC Drew Petzing interviewed for the Bears’ HC job. Now QB coach Israel Woolfork could interview for the Bears’ OC job.
-
Technology1 week ago
Nintendo omits original Donkey Kong Country Returns team from the remaster’s credits
-
Culture1 week ago
American men can’t win Olympic cross-country skiing medals — or can they?
-
Culture7 days ago
Book Review: ‘Somewhere Toward Freedom,’ by Bennett Parten
-
World1 week ago
Chrystia Freeland, Justin Trudeau’s ‘Minister of Everything,’ Enters Race to Replace Him
-
Education1 week ago
Report Projecting Drop in Freshman Enrollment Delivered Incorrect Findings
-
News1 week ago
CNN liable for defamation over story on Afghanistan 'black market' rescues
-
World1 week ago
‘Fields were solitary’: Migration raids send chill across rural California
-
World1 week ago
Commission claims slashing of foreign offices still under negotiation