Connect with us

Arizona

Arkansas’ fired prisons chief did ‘crazy things’ in Arizona, says union head | Arkansas Democrat Gazette

Published

on

Arkansas’ fired prisons chief did ‘crazy things’ in Arizona, says union head | Arkansas Democrat Gazette


Joe Profiri was a good guy. But then he got a promotion.

“He was good when he was in the lower ranks,” said Carlos Garcia, executive director of the Arizona Correctional Peace Officers Association, which is the state’s largest independent labor organization.

“Once they started promoting and they put him in the fold, he becomes a company man,” said Garcia.

Profiri was eventually promoted to deputy director of the Arizona Department of Corrections.

Advertisement

“It was all over,” said Garcia. “He was doing crazy things and allowing crazy things to go on. And he got used to that. This guy’s been grass-fed now. He’s going to go to Arkansas and do the same thing.”

What crazy things was he doing?

Among others, adding prison beds without sufficient staff to maintain safety, under orders from former Gov. Doug Ducey, said Garcia.

“You think it’s appropriate to have more beds when you don’t have staff? That’s suicidal,” said Garcia. “Adding more beds when you don’t have staff, assaults go up. Even inmates have families. … You’re also harming the public at the same time.”

Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders hired Profiri a year ago to be Arkansas’ secretary of corrections.

Advertisement

“During his career with the Arizona Department of Corrections, Joe has served in many capacities, beginning in 1988 as a correctional officer,” according to a news release from the governor’s office. He was appointed deputy director of the Arizona department in 2018.

On Wednesday — after a row over Profiri’s attempt to add hundreds of beds in Arkansas prisons — the state Board of Corrections voted 5-2 to fire him from that job.

A few hours later, Sanders announced she had hired Profiri as a senior adviser in her office.

Alexa Henning, the governor’s press secretary, didn’t respond to voicemail and email messages on Thursday asking how much Profiri will be paid, where the money will come from, and what his duties will be. She also didn’t respond to emails asking whether Profiri would be made available for an interview.

Dina Tyler, director of communications for the Arkansas Department of Corrections, said Profiri will have to vacate his residence provided by the state.

Advertisement

“By policy, employees who live in staff housing have 30 days to vacate the premises after termination,” Tyler said in an email. “Most don’t stay that long, but some employees need the time to make other arrangements.”

Garcia said he has known Profiri for more than 30 years. Garcia said he worked for the Arizona Department of Corrections for 20 years, and for Dora Schriro, a previous department director, for three years.

In Arizona, Profiri worked most recently for Department of Corrections Director David Shinn. Both left their jobs at the end of 2022, just before Katie Hobbs, a Democrat, took over as governor, replacing the Republican Gov. Ducey, who was prohibited by term limit laws from running again.

Garcia said Profiri was “way more knowledgeable” than Shinn about Arizona prisons.

Profiri had served briefly as acting director of the department after the retirement of Charles Ryan in August 2019. Ducey appointed Shinn as director in October of that year.

Advertisement

Garcia said things were particularly bad during the pandemic.

“We were short staffed and we were in the midst of covid,” he said. “So our staff was in worse condition than ever. These two fellows — between Profiri and Shinn, they backed each other up — they claimed that prison was the safest place to be and that we didn’t need to wear masks or anything for protection against covid. …

“A month later, we ended up losing at least 15 inmates and a few staff. Among the staff that passed away because of those s****y mandates were two deputy wardens … and a couple of other high-ranked individuals. Only then did they say, ‘OK wear masks, we have to wear masks and all that.’”

Garcia said a deputy director should provide counsel to the director and tell them when they come up with a bad idea. Otherwise, the deputy director is complicit.

Garcia said Shinn and Profiri would “try to shave policy down to make it more convenient for them and the governor.”

Advertisement

“It was a constant battle until he left, until that guy left and you guys took him,” said Garcia. “It was the same garbage you guys are going to experience. … You can’t protect the public if you don’t have staff. You can’t add more beds if you don’t have staff. That is a formula for disaster that we experienced and now you guys are experiencing it over there.”

Profiri is at the center of a constitutional crisis in Arkansas corrections.

Hired by the governor, Profiri operated as if he didn’t have to answer to the state Board of Corrections.

Historically, under the Arkansas Constitution, the secretary serves at the pleasure of the board. But last year, two laws were passed that appear to change that.

Acts 185 and 659 were passed during the 2023 legislative session and signed into law by Sanders. Act 185 would require the secretary of corrections to serve at the pleasure of the governor, and Act 659 would, in part, require directors of the Divisions of Correction and Community Correction to serve at the pleasure of the secretary.

Advertisement

Attorneys for the board argue that the laws violate the state constitution’s Amendment 33, which was ratified in 1942. The amendment prevents the Legislature and governor from making certain changes to boards or commissions that oversee the state’s charitable, penal or correctional institutions, as well as institutions of higher learning.

The board filed a lawsuit seeking to ensure that the it maintains its authority to supervise and manage the corrections secretary, as well as the directors of the Department of Corrections’ Division of Correction and Division of Community Correction.

Pulaski County Circuit Judge Patricia James on Dec. 15 issued a temporary restraining order barring the enforcement of Act 185 of 2023 and portions of Act 659 of 2023, which the board contends weaken the board’s authority set forth in the Arkansas Constitution.

After a hearing last week, James converted the order into a preliminary injunction, which will stay in place until the lawsuit is resolved.

Attorney General Tim Griffin, who represents the defendants in the lawsuit, promised to appeal the judge’s ruling to the Arkansas Supreme Court.

Advertisement

Garcia had some thoughts on the latest saga.

“Any governor that hires a director, that director is mandated to do what that governor’s agenda is,” he said. “Whatever that governor wants, that director’s going to do. And if people think that’s not true, they’re completely delusional. …

“This is not that they’re bad people: These are good people doing bad things. When you promote to a position that is so high that you have to answer to a governor or a president, you have to make an oath to them and tell them, ‘I will do what needs to be done, whether it’s right or wrong, and if I don’t like it, I shouldn’t work for you.’”

It’s still like the Wild West in Arizona, Garcia said.

“We carry pistols with gun exposed,” he said. “We don’t need permits. We can walk around with an AR-15 on our back for all we care. Gigantic machetes. It doesn’t matter. This is the wild, wild West. These gentlemen have that mentality, and when they move somewhere else, they bring it with them. … He went over there with the mentality of Arizona: We will do what we want to do and enforce it, and you will do what we say, not what we do.’ That was the philosophy. It always has been.”

Advertisement

Relations deteriorated between Profiri and the board in November when board members learned that Profiri was forging ahead to add a total of 622 additional beds to five prisons.

During a public meeting that month, the board approved adding 60 beds at the Ouachita River Unit in Malvern and 70 beds at the North Central Unit in Calico Rock, but held off on adding the additional 492 at three other facilities.

Board member Lee Watson said Profiri was not present during that meeting and that the board learned “by proxy” about the secretary’s desire to add those beds.

In spite of Profiri’s absence and refusal to communicate, the board still approved the new beds at Ouachita River and North Central units, Watson said.

Sanders held a news conference at the state Capitol the next week to criticize the board for failing to approve all the beds Profiri had requested.

Advertisement

Sanders called for the board to hold an emergency meeting to add the beds. Instead, it took up the issue at its next regular meeting, on Dec. 8.

During the December meeting, Profiri was present, but he was “defensive” and “argumentative” when the subject of more beds was brought up, Watson said.

The board approved adding 124 beds at the Ester Unit and tentatively agreed to the 244 beds at the McPherson Unit on the condition that the board be informed about where those new inmates were being transferred from. The board chose not to vote on the additional 124 beds at the Tucker Unit in Jefferson County.

Noticing that Profiri was taking orders directly from the governor based on Act 185, board members realized they faced the likelihood of litigation, so they voted to hire Little Rock attorney Abtin Mehdizadegan as outside counsel at the end of the Dec. 8 meeting.

Sanders announced after the meeting that Profiri would add those beds to the Tucker facility without the board’s approval, and she criticized the board.

Advertisement

On Dec. 14, the board voted 3-2 to suspend Profiri with pay. That same day, the board filed its lawsuit against Profiri, Sanders and the Department of Corrections.

Meanwhile, Griffin filed a separate lawsuit against the board, alleging that it violated state law when it hired outside counsel.

The next hearing in that lawsuit is scheduled for Jan. 22 in Pulaski County Circuit Court.



Source link

Advertisement

Arizona

Arizona NAACP responds to ‘Simon Says’ case, calls for police accountability

Published

on

Arizona NAACP responds to ‘Simon Says’ case, calls for police accountability


PHOENIX — The Arizona NAACP is responding to the violent arrest of Israel Devoe, a Phoenix man who was acquitted of all charges stemming from a 2024 traffic stop in which officers punched, kneed, and elbowed him.

Sarah Tyree, president of the Arizona NAACP State Conference, said the case is part of a broader and familiar pattern.

“What happened here reflects a pattern our communities know all too well. Time and again, we see policing tactics that are dangerous and deeply harmful to civilians, yet are later justified as ‘within policy’ through carefully crafted reports and the broad protections afforded under Graham v. Connor,” Tyree wrote in an emailed statement following an ABC15 investigation.

RELATEDPhoenix man to file lawsuit after dangerous game of ‘Simon Says’ with police

Advertisement

Phoenix police officials found all four officers involved in Devoe’s arrest to have acted within policy, records show.

After a two-day trial, jurors unanimously found Devoe not guilty on all four of the felony charges against him — including aggravated assault on officers and resisting arrest.

In her statement, Tyree said true accountability is not possible without changing state law.

“Accountability remains out of reach in Arizona because the Peace Officers’ Bill of Rights continues to insulate misconduct from meaningful oversight, too often shifting blame onto the very communities most impacted by these encounters,” she wrote. “We also encourage Arizona voters to engage their state legislators and advocate for the repeal or amendment of the Peace Officers’ Bill of Rights to ensure systems of public safety are truly accountable to the public they serve.”

Devoe’s case again highlights problems with policing in Phoenix, which has been under scrutiny following a Department of Justice investigation that found the city had a pattern and practice of using excessive force, discrimination, and weak oversight.

Advertisement

ABC15 is committed to finding the answers you need and holding those accountable.

Submit your news tip to Investigators@abc15.com

The push for federal oversight ended in 2025 after the Trump administration ended such efforts across the country.

Devoe’s civil attorney, Jesse Showalter, also represents Tyron McAlpin, a deaf Black man with cerebral palsy who was violently arrested by Phoenix officers in July 2024. Showalter has said both cases reflect what he described as an accepted norm of extreme violence within the Phoenix Police Department.

A Phoenix police spokesperson said the department declines to comment because Devoe is set to file a lawsuit against the city.

Advertisement

This digital article was produced with the assistance of AI and converted to this platform based on the broadcast story written and reported by ABC15 Chief Investigator Dave Biscobing (Dave@abc15.com). Our editorial team verifies all reporting on all platforms for fairness and accuracy. 





Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Arizona Lottery Pick 3, Fantasy 5 results for March 1, 2026

Published

on

Arizona Lottery Pick 3, Fantasy 5 results for March 1, 2026


play

The Arizona Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.

Here’s a look at Sunday, March 1, 2026 results for each game:

Advertisement

Winning Pick 3 numbers

6-4-2

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Fantasy 5 numbers

01-07-11-18-28

Check Fantasy 5 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Triple Twist numbers

12-17-23-31-37-42

Advertisement

Check Triple Twist payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news and results

What time is the Powerball drawing?

Powerball drawings are at 7:59 p.m. Arizona time on Mondays, Wednesdays and Saturdays.

How much is a Powerball lottery ticket today?

In Arizona, Powerball tickets cost $2 per game, according to the Arizona Lottery.

Advertisement

How to play the Powerball

To play, select five numbers from 1 to 69 for the white balls, then select one number from 1 to 26 for the red Powerball.

You can choose your lucky numbers on a play slip or let the lottery terminal randomly pick your numbers.

To win, match one of the 9 Ways to Win:

  • 5 white balls + 1 red Powerball = Grand prize.
  • 5 white balls = $1 million.
  • 4 white balls + 1 red Powerball = $50,000.
  • 4 white balls = $100.
  • 3 white balls + 1 red Powerball = $100.
  • 3 white balls = $7.
  • 2 white balls + 1 red Powerball = $7.
  • 1 white ball + 1 red Powerball = $4.
  • 1 red Powerball = $4.

There’s a chance to have your winnings increased two, three, four, five and 10 times through the Power Play for an additional $1 per play. Players can multiply non-jackpot wins up to 10 times when the jackpot is $150 million or less.

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

All Arizona Lottery retailers will redeem prizes up to $100 and may redeem winnings up to $599. For prizes over $599, winners can submit winning tickets through the mail or in person at Arizona Lottery offices. By mail, send a winner claim form, winning lottery ticket and a copy of a government-issued ID to P.O. Box 2913, Phoenix, AZ 85062.

To submit in person, sign the back of your ticket, fill out a winner claim form and deliver the form, along with the ticket and government-issued ID to any of these locations:

Advertisement

Phoenix Arizona Lottery Office: 4740 E. University Drive, Phoenix, AZ 85034, 480-921-4400. Hours: 7:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday, closed holidays. This office can cash prizes of any amount.

Tucson Arizona Lottery Office: 2955 E. Grant Road, Tucson, AZ 85716, 520-628-5107. Hours: 7:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday, closed holidays. This office can cash prizes of any amount.

Phoenix Sky Harbor Lottery Office: Terminal 4 Baggage Claim, 3400 E. Sky Harbor Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85034, 480-921-4424. Hours: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Sunday, closed holidays. This office can cash prizes up to $49,999.

Kingman Arizona Lottery Office: Inside Walmart, 3396 Stockton Hill Road, Kingman, AZ 86409, 928-753-8808. Hours: 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Saturday and Sunday, closed holidays. This office can cash prizes up to $49,999.

Advertisement

Check previous winning numbers and payouts at https://www.arizonalottery.com/.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by an Arizona Republic editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Continue Reading

Arizona

Here’s how to give public comment on future Colorado River plans

Published

on

Here’s how to give public comment on future Colorado River plans


PHOENIX — After years of negotiations, Arizona still doesn’t know what its long-term water future will look like, and now the federal government is preparing to step in.

States across the Colorado River Basin have failed to reach a deal on how to share the shrinking river after current operating rules expire in 2026. With no state-led agreement in place, federal officials are moving forward with their own plan, one that could bring steep cuts to Arizona’s water supply.

And for Arizonans, the clock is ticking to weigh in. Public comment remains open until March 2. To submit your comment on what the government should do, send your comments in email to crbpost2026@usbr.gov.

Additional information is available online. The project website can be accessed here, along with links to YouTube videos published by the government, recorded in January and February which walk through of the options available.

Advertisement

Many Arizona leaders have already offered their public comments, which are overwhelmingly negative.

“We were very disappointed with that document,” said Brenda Burman, the Central Arizona Project General Manager “If any of those alternatives were implemented, it would be very difficult, and perhaps devastating for Arizona.”

Arizona’s top Colorado River negotiator, Tom Buschatzke, echoed those concerns.

“None of those alternatives are very good for the state of Arizona,” Buschatzke said. “I’m not seeing how we’re going to break that stalemate.”

Congressman Juan Ciscomani also criticized the proposals, saying the impacts of Colorado River cuts extends into Pinal, and Pima counties.

Advertisement

“That’s not an acceptable solution for us,” Ciscomani said. “We want to play ball, but we want to make sure everyone across the board uses less and becomes more efficient.”

Some of the federal alternatives would reduce Arizona’s Colorado River supply by 40%, 50%, or in the most extreme case up to 70%.

Experts at ASU Kyl Center for Water Policy say part of the problem lies upstream.

“The reason for this current impasse is because the upper basin states have refused to take cuts in their Colorado River use,” said Sarah Porter, the center’s director.

Upper Basin states like Colorado and Utah rely on different water rules than Arizona and other Lower Basin states, complicating negotiations that have dragged on for years.

Advertisement

Arizona has already been living with cuts for several years. Since 2021, the state has faced an 18% reduction in Colorado River water deliveries due to a Tier 1 shortage declaration. Most of those cuts have fallen on Central Arizona Project users, including agriculture and some tribal communities.

Buschatzke argues that pushing Arizona into deeper reductions would violate long-standing Western water law.

“We will be protecting the state of Arizona,” he said. “And if that has to be litigation, it will be litigation.”

That means a lawsuit against the federal government, or upper basin states is now a real possibility if the final plan moves forward unchanged. The state legislature has put $3 million in a state fund for potential litigation on the Colorado River.

After the comment period closes, the federal government is required to review public feedback and issue a formal ‘Record of Decision’, likely sometime this summer. Advocacy groups say public feedback matters.

Advertisement

“I just encourage Arizonans to look at this document, understand what that means for your family, your businesses, and what it means for the future,” said Kyle Roerink of the Great Basin Water Network. “Then figure out if you want to advocate for one scenario over another.”

A new operating plan must be in place by October 1, setting the rules for how the Colorado River will be managed for years to come, and shaping Arizona’s water future in the process.

This story was reported on-air by a journalist and has been converted to this platform with the assistance of AI. Our editorial team verifies all reporting on all platforms for fairness and accuracy.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending