Connect with us

West

Are affordable housing mandates constitutional? Lawmakers respond to the affordability crisis nationwide

Published

on

Are affordable housing mandates constitutional? Lawmakers respond to the affordability crisis nationwide

As many young Americans struggle to become homeowners, lawmakers nationwide are crafting legislation to ensure housing needs are met, sparking a debate on the constitutionality of affordable housing mandates

The state of New Jersey is embattled in a lawsuit over its affordable housing mandates as city leaders argue the mandate is putting a strain on municipalities due to a lack of available infrastructure to meet the demands. 

Fox News Digital chatted with Montvalle, NJ Mayor Michael Ghassali, who is leading the charge against the state, to get his take on the latest legislation. 

BOTH HARRIS AND TRUMP NEED AN ANSWER TO HOUSING CRISIS   

“Being the mayor of a small town, we have been building affordable housing for the last three rounds. In fact, about 10% of Montvale is affordable housing stock… What has happened is our infrastructure is affected,” Ghassali told Fox News Digital. “We have low water pressure. So, we have fire hydrants with low water pressure on the west side of town. Now, we have to add a second water tower. We have to add additional police officers… We passed a $30 million referendum to increase the size of the middle school because we need more space. The traffic has been a lot worse than ever before. It’s a small town, but it takes twenty minutes to go from one end to the other. So, it has affected our quality of life in town just by adding more people.”   

Advertisement

The small-town mayor voiced his concerns over the law not taking into account affordable housing units in 62 urban aid municipalities and expressed a desire to work with the state in crafting a smart plan moving forward. 

“I would love for Trenton and for the legislators to just listen to us and trust us,” Ghassali, told Fox News Digital. “We want to build, but our infrastructure doesn’t hold it. So, we asked for some time to just assess what we have before we could do more. … We know our towns. We know our streets. We know what we can and what we can’t do. We want to work with them. We don’t want to fight this. We need affordable housing. I have two sons who will not be able to afford to live in the town they grew up in. So, I get it. We need affordable housing. Just listen to us.”   

On the opposite side of the country, California Gov. Gavin Newsom also introduced legislation to help give Americans affordable housing opportunities. Fox News Digital reached out to the governor’s office, who provided more information.

“(The governor) invested over $40 billion to boost affordable housing across the state, including through expanded state tax credits, infrastructure grants, and funding for climate-friendly housing,” the statement read, “(Along with investing) over $27 billion to address homelessness, with a focus on ending street encampments, (and) requiring first-ever regional homelessness plans for California for cities, counties, and CoC’s.” 

Newsom has also planned for 1 million affordable housing units by 2030, pioneered the Homekey and Project Roomkey to get 72,000 people off the streets, put aside funding to address housing encampments, created renter protections and adopted a new framework on providing care to those experiencing psychosis, to name a few of the many measures shared by his office. 

Advertisement

“No more excuses,” Newsom said in a September press release. “California is taking action to fix the decades-long homelessness, housing, and mental health crises. These new laws — paired with the state’s unprecedented resources — will deliver more housing, get people off the streets, and provide life-changing support that will benefit all Californians.” 

Fox News Digital reached out to legal experts to way in on the constitutionality of the affordable housing fight. 

The Wright Law Firm founder Jamie E. Wright said the debate delves into the “age-old struggle between state authority and local autonomy surrounding decision-making.” 

“(In the New Jersey case), the state contends that ensuring low-income and middle-income families have access to housing is a vital interest according to the Mount Laurel doctrine,” she explained. “On the other hand, municipalities are resisting this mandate, arguing that it infringes upon their jurisdiction and disrupts their control over zoning and resources. At its core, the legal issue revolves around whether the state’s commitment to equity and anti-segregation goals trumps the independence of local governments. This discussion goes beyond housing; it’s a fight over determining the future direction of New Jersey communities.”    

Raul Gastesi, attorney and co-Founder of Gastesi Lopez & Mestre, based in Miami, offered a different perspective on the constitutionality of affordable housing mandates, using the debate over Florida’s Live Local Act as an example.   

Advertisement

“I believe that the mandates are constitutional so long as they are mandated by the state legislature and not the courts,” Gastesi said. “The issue of affordable housing is increasingly becoming a creature of state law as opposed to local or municipal law. The state legislators all too often believe that the local governments are exacerbating the housing shortage with local ordinances and zoning restrictions, including land use rules that make it extremely costly and difficult to construct multifamily housing.”    

Fox News Digital reached out to New Jersey Senate Majority Whip Troy Singleton (D-Delran), who sponsored the state bill, to get his take on the lawsuit, but he did not respond to multiple requests for comment.  

New Jersey Globe reported that Singleton said “affluent, suburban towns opposing affordable housing mandates is nothing new.”  

“Same story, different day,” Singleton said, according to the New Jersey Globe. “What is incredibly offensive, beyond using taxpayer dollars to fund this politically-driven, superfluous lawsuit, is the attempt to use the legal process to intentionally delay our affordable housing laws – not by weeks or months, but years.”   

Advertisement

Fox News Digital also reached out to the New Jersey Department of Community Affairs, which declined to comment on the pending legislation.    

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

San Francisco, CA

All Aboard the 67, San Francisco’s Most Delayed Bus | KQED

Published

on

All Aboard the 67, San Francisco’s Most Delayed Bus | KQED


Muni driver Hannibal is reflected in a rearview mirror as he operates the 67 Bernal Heights bus in San Francisco on Feb. 18, 2026. The route is among those with the most persistent delays, according to Muni performance data. (Gustavo Hernandez/KQED)



Source link

Continue Reading

Denver, CO

Five takeaways from Denver’s restaurant report

Published

on

Five takeaways from Denver’s restaurant report


Marlee Brown serves guests at Trybal African Speakeasy in Denver on Feb. 25, 2026. (Kevin Mohatt/Special to The Denver Post)

Denver’s restaurant scene is in crisis.

So much so that the city, VisitDenver and Austin, Texas-based restaurant financing company InKind commissioned a report to detail the industry.

Advertisement

Denver’s rising tipped minimum wage, which has more than doubled since 2019 and sits at $16.27 an hour, was the biggest complaint of local restaurateurs. But the 67-page document outlined a host of other problems creating an unfavorable environment for operators in the city.

“The energy of the city used to flow through our dining rooms,” a longtime, independent full-service operator said, according to the report. “Now it feels like people go out less often, spend more cautiously, and are more likely to stay home or order in.”

The report was written by Adam Schlegel, who co-founded Snooze A.M. Eatery and Chook Charcoal Chicken, and Dana Faulk Query, the co-owner of Big Red F Restaurant Group. To compile it, they surveyed over 150 establishments, conducted interviews with operators and brokers and analyzed profit and loss statements along with publicly available datasets.

Here are five takeaways:

Advertisement

Screenshot 2026 03 05 at 2.38.42 PM

Denver lost thousands of restaurant jobs between 2020 and 2025

Bureau of Labor Statistics data indicates that Denver had 6% fewer restaurant sector workers in 2025 than at the beginning of 2020. That’s largely due to a 15% decline in the full-service restaurant category, according to the report. 

Before the start of the pandemic, restaurant employment in Denver was growing at a 2.3% annual rate. If it had continued at that rate, there would be 10,000 to 15,000 more workers today than there actually are, according to the report.

Restaurants employ 7.9% of Denver’s total workers, down 8.7% from 2019, and account for 13% of the city’s tax revenue, the report said.

Screenshot 2026 03 04 at 2.53.52 PM

Restaurants would have needed 40% sales growth to offset rising expenses

Advertisement

According to the report, from 2019 through 2024, hourly labor costs increased 50% to 55%, rent increased 23% and cost of goods sold rose 22%. Profits, on the other hand, declined 20%.

Sales increased by 5%, but an analysis by the report’s authors determined that number would need to be in the 36% to 40% range to offset the aforementioned hikes.

The number of guests coming through restaurant doors is also decreasing, the report said. And Denver reported the sharpest decrease of major metros in restaurant spending this past fall.

“This mismatch has left many operators with limited options beyond reducing labor hours, eliminating positions, delaying hiring, or closing altogether,” the report said.

Screenshot 2026 03 04 at 3.03.31 PM

Denver’s costs and prices are on par with New York and L.A.’s

Advertisement

The report said Denver’s dining scene looks less like a middle-America growth market and more like a “high-cost coastal city” without the population size to support it. Though it acknowledged that Denver’s rising wages have closed the cost of living gap compared with before the pandemic, it’s paid the price with lost jobs and other rising costs.

According to the Washington Hospitality Association’s 2025 Cost of Dining Report, Colorado’s menu prices are 5.1% above the national average and Denver’s are about 2.7% above the average for the 20 largest U.S. cities. That puts it firmly in the high-cost tier of American dining markets.

But rather than garnering the growth and attention that “tier one” cities like New York and Los Angeles get, Denver is in the category of “high-wage, tight-labor” cities like San Francisco, Portland and Seattle.

“Establishments grew, but employment is up only modestly versus 2013 and down from 2019 in key categories, signaling staffing strain rather than robust job growth,” the report details.

Denver’s scene is lagging compared with the rest of the state

Advertisement

While dining out across Colorado has taken a hit since the start of the pandemic, the report shows that the changes are most pronounced in Denver. The industry hasn’t bounced back on par with the rest of the state, the report says.

With full-service restaurants in particular, employment and the number of establishments has dropped significantly more than the category across the state. Employment across the entire sector dropped 4.3% in Denver from 2019 to 2024 while seeing a 3.3% decline everywhere else in Colorado.

“Collectively, these findings indicate that Denver’s restaurant workforce challenges are not the result of poor management or short-term disruptions, but of sustained cost pressures that increasingly limit employers’ ability to maintain staffing levels, create new jobs, and invest in long-term workforce development,” the report says.

Despite improvements, city bureaucracy still a challenge

Architects, general contractors and operators said that while each individual city department is helpful in a vacuum, the process is fragmented and disjointed. Based on interviews with restaurant owners, those delays can cost up to $70,000 a month between operating expenses and lost revenue, the report said.

Advertisement

That’s despite improvements made to the permitting process by Mayor Mike Johnston, including the launch of Denver’s Permitting Office in May and programs like around downtown express permitting.



Source link

Continue Reading

Seattle, WA

Seattle’s Real Time Crime Center triples arrest odds, according to police review – MyNorthwest.com

Published

on

Seattle’s Real Time Crime Center triples arrest odds, according to police review – MyNorthwest.com


The rape suspect didn’t know police were watching.

Earlier this year, a Seattle officer took a report of forcible rape and kept returning to the neighborhood, hoping the suspect’s vehicle might show up again. Eventually, it did.

“He immediately called our Real Time Crime Center,” Seattle Police Chief Shon Barnes recalled during SPD’s 2025 Year in Review.

Analysts pulled video from the previous day and located the same car described by a witness. The officer asked for confirmation of the registration tag. Analysts matched the plate, and officers made the arrest.

Advertisement

The case is one of hundreds illustrating how Seattle’s Real Time Crime Center (RTCC), which launched in May 2025, is changing the way the department responds to crime.

Officers 3x more likely to make arrest with RTCC support, data shows

According to a department analysis of 220,000 calls for service, officers and detectives are three times more likely to arrest a suspect when they receive support from RTCC analysts.

SPD’s Performance Analytics & Research group reviewed every 911 response in the nine months since the center opened. The results, Barnes said, show the impact of pairing frontline officers with real‑time data, video, and investigative support.

The RTCC assisted in 17 homicide cases last year and helped close 10 of them, which Barnes credits for the city’s homicide clearance rate rising to 86 percent, which is far above the national average.

The system is poised to grow with new cameras being installed in Capitol Hill, the Stadium District, and near Garfield High School.

Advertisement

The expansion comes amid privacy concerns.

In fall 2025, the Seattle City Council voted 7–2 to expand video surveillance, adding more closed‑circuit cameras and allowing police access to 145 Seattle Department of Transportation traffic cameras.

More than 100 residents spoke against the move during public comment, concerned that expanded surveillance could expose immigrants, protesters, and marginalized communities to federal monitoring. Councilmember Alexis Mercedes Rinck, who voted against the measures, warned the system could be misused by federal agencies.

Public Safety Chair Bob Kettle pushed back on those concerns, saying many criticisms were based on misconceptions.

“SPD only shares data with the federal government in matters of criminal enforcement,” Kettle said, noting that otherwise “a federal agency would need to subpoena the data.”

Advertisement

The Real Time Crime Center remains in a two‑year pilot phase, with an independent evaluation underway by the Office of Inspector General and researchers from the University of Pennsylvania.

Read more of Aaron Granillo’s stories here.






Source link

Continue Reading

Trending