Connect with us

Alaska

The glass bottle mystery: The history of the Zarembo Springs Mineral Company

Published

on

The glass bottle mystery: The history of the Zarembo Springs Mineral Company


Part of a continuing weekly series on Alaska history by local historian David Reamer.

It began with a bottle, not in the usual way as a tragedy, but a mystery. Tinted blue and clearly old, the heavy glass bottle is imperfect with numerous bubbles frozen forever in the medium. A surprising embossed brand on its body: Zarembo Springs Mineral Co., Seattle, Washington. After an impulse purchase, I still wondered, what was its story? Here is the answer.

Zarembo Island, a large and unpopulated part of the Alexander Archipelago, lies west, southwest of Wrangell. Its Tlingít name is ShtaxʼNoow, and before the arrival of settlers, the area Shtaxʼhéen Ḵwáan (Stikine people) preserved Zarembo Island as a hunting sanctuary. In a 1946 report on Tlingit and Haida land rights and usage, Walter Goldschmidt and Theodore Haas quote Tlingit elder Willis Hoagland, “Zarembo Island belonged to the whole of the Wrangell people. No special clan owned that.”

Advertisement

The Zarembo name is a relic of the Russian period of Alaska history. Dionysius Zarembo, captain of the Russian-American Company ship Chichagof, surveyed the area in 1834 and 1838. When British explorer George Vancouver passed through in 1793, he called it Duke of York Island.

As settlers entered the area, they used the island for deer hunting, logging, and as a sort of nearby vacation destination. Early 20th-century Alaska sources are rife with tales of multi-day trips packed with picnics, food, and even some mild frolicking. Maybe even some undocumented cavorting. From a 1909 Wrangell Sentinel article, “It took half a dozen boys, more or less, 14 guns, the schooner Plymouth Rock, and one Scripps motor, etc., to capture one poor little motherless deer on its way home from Sunday School last Sunday on Zarembo Island. The story the boys tell of the incidents of the trip would fill a Sunday edition of the Seattle Times, and their description of the midnight fishing for sandwiches would be a seller anywhere.”

And sometimes, if a local was feeling somewhat under the weather, they might partake of the island’s renowned mineral waters. From a 1909 Sentinel article, “Phil. Haught and Leo McCormack left for Zarembo Island Monday morning, there to rest for a few days, and fill up on the fine mineral water for which the island is so famous.” Or, from a different 1909 article, “The first thing upon arrival was a visit to the spring house where for the first time we tasted the wonderful Zarembo mineral water, rightly named ‘The Sparks of Life.’”

The Zarembo Island spring conveniently issues on the shore by St. John Harbor, on the island’s northwest side. The water possesses a relatively high mineral content, primarily calcium, carbonate, and sodium, in addition to some sulfur and iron. Covered at high tide, the water overhead bubbles from the spring’s release.

As is the way with much of modern Alaska history, someone finally looked at the spring and thought, “I could make some money off that.” The Zarembo Mineral Springs Company, based in Seattle, was incorporated on Nov. 4, 1904. Frank Wadsworth (1870-1906), one of the few fortune hunters to escape the Klondike Gold Rush with an actual fortune, was the founder and president. While sales likely began earlier, the product was formally introduced to the public at the Lewis and Clark Centennial Exposition that ran from June to October 1905 in Portland, Oregon.

Advertisement

To prevent contamination from salt water, the bottling company built a small structure over a 10-foot-high concrete box surrounding the spring. A wooden wharf connected the spring building to the dock. The company bought a small launch, also named the Zarembo, to ferry the water from Alaska to Seattle. The bottling was done at a building owned by Wadsworth on Ninth Avenue.

From the few contemporary photographs of Zarembo Mineral Springs Company products, it appears that they produced several types of bottles. The most unique was a torpedo-shaped Hamilton bottle with rounded bottoms that could only be stored on its side. These Hamilton bottles would have been corked instead of metal-capped. Cork stoppers dry out over time, which, for carbonated drinks, would allow air to escape and the bubbly drink to go flat. William Hamilton designed the first torpedo bottle for carbonated beverages in 1814.

In Seattle, a town built in part upon the mining of prospectors, fortune hunters, traders, and tourists to and from Alaska, the clean, refreshing water of Zarembo Island was one more way to consume the wealth of the farther north. In particular, the Zarembo company built a brand based upon the lasting cachet of Alaska, in this case, that any water from there would be the purest and best exemplar of its type. A postcard from this era, titled The Morning After, shows a man in the throes of a hangover seeking a cure from a mineral water cooler labeled Alaska.

The Zarembo Mineral Springs Company made this association, of intrinsic Alaska quality and their own product, explicit in their advertising. A May 1906 Pacific Monthly magazine advertisement declared, “Alaska produces HEALTH as well as WEALTH.” The July edition of that magazine included a different advertisement that targeted female consumers. A woman who tried their product, “Blooms with new health at every sip of pure Zarembo water.”

Faith in the curative powers of mineral springs is an ancient human belief. And the practice of bottling spring water is centuries old. The first record of bottled mineral water is from 1622, at the Holy Well outside Malvern Wells, England. Bottled mineral water soon became an internationally traded product as advocates chased one outlandish medicinal claim after another. In 1767, the first American commercial water bottler opened in 1767 Boston. If anything, it is surprising that it took until 1904 for an Alaska-sourced mineral water company to enter the crowded field.

Advertisement

There are a few signs of success. A 1908 note in the Douglas Island News claimed Zarembo Mineral Water sales were “five times greater than a year ago.” There was an impressive display at the 1909 Alaska-Yukon-Pacific Exposition in Seattle, where judges awarded the company a gold medal for their mineral water. And in August 1909, the mineral water was featured during Made in Washington Day, a celebration of products from the state of Washington. At least the bottles were from Washington; the water’s Alaska origins were apparently downplayed when it suited company interests.

However, there are far more signs of a product struggling to survive, with the flavor being the foremost. Per the August 5, 1915 Wrangell Sentinel, “We would judge from the taste that the principal ingredients are soda, iron and sulphur, and being heavily charged with gas bubbles and sparkles when first taken from the spring, like freshly opened champagne. The first taste gives one the impression that the flavor might be improved by the addition of other ingredients, possibly rotten eggs, but after a few drinks and the effect is partially realized you forget the first uncomfortable taste, a feeling of rejuvenation comes over you and almost at once you feel certain that you are on the road to being restored to a normal and healthy condition.”

The iron content was also reportedly low enough to escape taste but high enough to stain bottles. And the Zarembo company entered a market already rich in competition. Mineral water brands like Buffalo Lithia, Aspenta, Bythinea, Red Cross, Hirano, Apollinaris, Red Raven Splits, Hunyadi János, U-Ran-Go, and many others, each with their own medicinal claims and romantic origins, clogged Seattle grocery store and pharmacy shelves.

The company struggled financially throughout its brief existence. A significant early investor, H. Stuart Brinley, sold his interest months before the Lewis and Clark Centennial Exposition. Wadsworth, the prime mover of the entire enterprise, died suddenly in 1906 at only 36 years old. In 1909, a company stock split and the relatively lavish display at the Alaska-Yukon-Pacific Exposition might have been last-ditch efforts to save the company.

Outside Seattle in the Lower 48, the company and product received almost no notice. Even in Wrangell, the bottler received only passing mentions. From 1906 to 1908, the product went nearly two years without mention in the major hometown newspapers. In the aftermath of Wadsworth’s death, the company may have temporarily ceased operations. In January 1910, Wadsworth’s widow sued for a divorce from her second husband, accusing him of “gross cruelty” and fraud. In particular, she claimed he had stolen a significant amount of property from her former husband’s estate, primarily from the Zarembo Mineral Springs Company holdings.

Advertisement

By the time of her lawsuit, the company was already bankrupt. On Jan. 25, 1910, all remaining company assets were auctioned off. And, to offer a sense of finality, a fire gutted the Zarembo bottling facility on Dec. 2, 1912. Two firefighters were injured fighting the blaze, which an arsonist had started. The facility, such as it was, on Zarembo Island quickly fell into ruins. By 1915, the concrete retaining wall had failed, allowing salt water in again.

In all, the Zarembo Springs Mineral Company came and went with barely a dent in the historical record, some advertisements, too few pictures, and some scattered bottles like mine. Perhaps the bottler was late to market, underfinanced, or kneecapped by the sudden death of its founder. There is too little evidence to speculate further and no lessons to be learned. Few prospered from the company’s brief existence, most notably a scoundrel second husband and the occasional eBay merchant preying upon innocent historians, and almost certainly no one from around Wrangell.

Key sources:

“Dine on Products of State.” Seattle Times, August 29, 1909, 5.

“Dove Coos Again in Rutherford Family.” Seattle Times, January 21, 1910, 15.

Advertisement

“Frank Wadsworth Expires Suddenly.” Seattle Post-Intelligencer, July 25, 1906, 16.

Goldschmidt, Walter R., and Theodore H. Haas. Haa Aani, Our Land: Tlingit and Haida Land Rights and Use. Juneau: Sealaska Heritage Foundation, 2000.

“New Corporations.” Seattle Times, August 10, 1909, 21.

Nichols, Sam H. State of Washington Eighth Biennial Report of the Secretary of State, 1904. Olympia: State of Washington, 1904.

“The Northland.” Douglas Island News, June 24, 1908, 1.

Advertisement

“One Poor Little Deer.” Wrangell Sentinel, July 22, 1909, 1.

“Possibilities at Zarembo Springs.” Wrangell Sentinel, August 5, 1915, 3.

“Seattle Machinery Houses Win.” Seattle Times, October 3, 1909, 22.

“Sentinel’s Force Has a Pleasant Trip.” Wrangell Sentinel, June 10, 1909, 5.

“Two Sustain Hurts at Morning Blaze.” Seattle Times, December 2, 1912, 8.

Advertisement

Untitled article. Wrangell Sentinel, July 15, 1909, 8.

Untitled bankruptcy auction article. Seattle Times, January 14, 1910, 26.

Waring, Gerald A. Mineral Springs of Alaska, USGS Water-Supply Paper 418. Washington DC: Government Printing Office, 1917.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Major new Air Force training center in Alaska will help boost defense of North America

Published

on

Major new Air Force training center in Alaska will help boost defense of North America


An Air Force F-22 takes off from its home base at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson Tuesday, May 2, 2017 during the Northern Edge training exercise. On the tarmac are F-16s and F-15s. (Loren Holmes / Alaska Dispatch News)

Work will start this summer on a Pentagon “mega-project” in Alaska intended to boost the Air Force’s training capability to defend North America.

The 150,000-square-foot Joint Integrated Test and Training Center at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage will contain 426 computer servers kept running by a 15 million megavolt-ampere electric substation. The project is slated to be completed in 2029 at a cost of up to $500 million.

John Budnik, spokesman for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, said the center will allow trainers to sync personnel on the ground with pilots in the air.

“It’s the only place in the Indo-Pacific Command that can host multi-domain simulators for joint and coalition fighters, including F-35s, F-22s, F-15s, F-18s, next-generation fighters, bombers, command and control platforms, intelligence surveillance, reconnaissance aircraft, and long-range weapons fire,” he said.

Advertisement

Thareth Casey, the program manager for the Army Corps of Engineers, said the training center is being designed so simulations can be adapted to include weapons and aircraft from other U.S. military branches, as well as NATO allies Canada, Finland, Sweden and others.

Air Force Col. Lisa Mabbutt, commander of the 673d Air Base Wing at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, said the training center’s location underlines the importance of Alaska and the Arctic to the U.S.

“It demonstrates a commitment to Alaska as both a key power-projection platform and one of our nation’s leading edges of homeland defense,” Mabbutt said.

While the long, warmer days of summer have allowed military and commercial ships to take advantage of new sea lanes, the training center has to be built to withstand the seasonal flipside: winter, with its minus-20 temperatures and days where sunset comes a little over five hours after sunrise.

Casey, the project manager, said construction has its challenges.

Advertisement

To keep the elements outside from impacting the work inside, the center will be built with a reinforced concrete foundation, steel-frame-insulated wall panels covered in masonry, and a steel-reinforced metal roof.

Construction will accelerate during the long, warmer summer days when the sun can be out for 20 hours. It will slow down during the cold, dark winters.

“It’s a one-of-a-kind project,” Casey said. “We’re constrained by the seasons but with planning, we expect to complete work by the fall of 2029.”

Despite a steady stream of reports about Russian and Chinese joint sea and air operations in the region, the U.S. commands that will be the primary users of the training center declined to specify which nations the training will focus on as possible aggressors.

A query to the 11th Air Force in Alaska was passed to Air Force headquarters at the Pentagon, which passed it to U.S. Indo-Pacific Command in Hawaii — which then passed it back to the 11th Air Force.

Advertisement

But political and military officials have made it clear in earlier statements that the focus will be on training to react to potential threats from Russia and China.

Former Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and top officers such as Air Force Gen. Anthony J. Cotton, head of Strategic Command, helped popularize the term “near-peer adversary,” a nation with a large military force approaching — it not reaching — equivalence with the United States. The term was most frequently shorthand for Russia. Cotton said in 2023 that Russia, which has about 5,900 nuclear warheads, was a “near peer adversary.”

The other term often used is “pacing challenge” — a country that is building up its military at a rapid rate. A 2023 Pentagon statement said the planned training center at Elmendorf-Richardson would allow “our warfighters to train against our pacing challenge in realistic threat scenarios.”

“China is the only country that can pose a systemic challenge to the United States in the sense of challenging us, economically, technologically, politically and militarily,” Colin Kahl, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Policy, said in 2023.

Kahl said being a pacing challenge didn’t mean the U.S. had to go to war with China.

Advertisement

“It does mean that we will have a more competitive and, at times, … adversarial relationship with Beijing,” he said.

Russia’s northern border is adjacent to the Arctic Ocean. From czars to Stalin to Putin, it has operated in the region for centuries.

China is a relative newcomer. Though 900 miles from the Arctic Circle, China in 2018 officially declared itself an “near-Arctic state” intent on becoming a “great polar power” by 2030.

In October 2024, a U.S. Coast Guard HC-130J long-range surveillance plane spotted Russian and Chinese ships operating together near the Bering Strait, the sea passage between Alaska and Russia that is just 55 miles wide at its closest point. Last year, American and Canadian fighters were scrambled to intercept Russian and Chinese long-range reconnaissance aircraft flying near the Alaska Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ), a U.S.-designated 150-mile buffer zone from U.S. territory.

Katherine Dahlstrand, a fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, a Washington, D.C., think tank, said Russia and China see the same military and commercial opportunities as the United States and its allies.

Advertisement

“The Arctic is a new transit space for military assets,” Dahlstrand said. “The potential for shorter trade routes around the world using northern passages would be revolutionary for many countries,” she said. “It draws a lot of interest. The area also has energy resources, fishing, and mining.”

Dahlstrand said putting the training center in Alaska and practicing scenarios for defending the region is an investment that will pay off in the future.

“The Arctic spans the globe and is a connector of regions — European, Indo-Pacific, and North America,” Dahlstrand said. “For the United States, it’s also homeland security.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

The Road to Patagonia review – an epic journey from Alaska to the Andes

Published

on

The Road to Patagonia review – an epic journey from Alaska to the Andes


Assembled from 16 years of footage, Matty Hannon’s feature debut embraces the possibility of the open road with full-hearted passion. His diaristic film documents his travels with the centrepiece being an astonishing journey from Alaska to Patagonia – first on motorbike, then on horse. Hannon’s zest for adventure first began as an undergraduate in ecology, when an encounter with a book on shamans in Indonesia urged him to move beyond the ivory tower of academia. He soon found himself in the Mentawai islands, living among the Salakirrat clan for five years; here, the Indigenous tribe see their surrounding environment as a living entity with inner spirits and souls.

As Hannon embarked on his years-long trip through the Americas, he brought this same sense of attention to the landscape, as it shifts from snow-capped mountain ranges to arid desert roads and stunning ocean waves. The cinematography glows with golden hues that bring to mind the bohemian spirit of 1970s counterculture films, an aesthetic accentuated by Daniel Norgren’s folksy soundtrack. Driven by an awe for natural beauty, the documentary also reveals its fragility, as new development in Chile and elsewhere threatens to drain rivers and wipe out whole forests.

When it comes to synthesising his experiences into social commentary, however, Hannon’s narration betrays certain levels of naivety. In emphasising the importance of sustainability, he often reinforces superficial binary oppositions about eastern and western ways of life. In reality, issues such as consumerism, environmental extraction and rapid industrialisation have always existed on a global scale. In contrast to Hannon’s musings, interviews with local figures provide valuable insights, which rescue the film from being politically and intellectually adrift.

Advertisement

The Road to Patagonia is on the Icon film channel from 30 May, and in UK cinemas from 27 June.



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

When Will the June SNAP Payments Be Deposited in the 48 Contiguous States, Alaska, and Hawaii?

Published

on

When Will the June SNAP Payments Be Deposited in the 48 Contiguous States, Alaska, and Hawaii?


Depending on the State or U.S. territory where you are currently living, SNAP payments may arrive earlier or later in June. The Food Stamps program is only for Americans with a limited income and little to no resources. Once you receive approval, you can receive money on an EBT card in order to buy groceries in authorized stores, farmers markets, and retailers.

For your information, it is important to highlight that the maximum SNAP amounts are the same in the 48 contiguous States. However, they are much higher in Hawaii and Alaska due to their cost of living. Guam and the United States Virgin Islands also have higher monthly payments. When it comes to paydays, each State and territory has its own schedule and way to arrange payment dates.

SNAP Payment Schedule for June 2025

From May 24 through May 28, only the States of Florida and Texas are still delivering Food Stamps for May. The other States and territories have already delivered all the money.

  • Alabama: June 4 to 23
  • Alaska: June 1
  • Arizona: June 1 to 13
  • Arkansas: June 4 to 13
  • California: June 1 to 10
  • Colorado: June 1 to 10
  • Connecticut: June 1 to 3
  • Delaware: June 2 to 23
  • Florida: June 1 to 28
  • Georgia: June 5 to 23
  • Hawaii: June 3 to 5
  • Idaho: June 1 to 10
  • Illinois: June 1 to 10
  • Indiana: June 5 to 23
  • Iowa: June 1 to 10
  • Kansas: June 1 to 10
  • Kentucky: June 1 to 19
  • Louisiana: June 1 to 23
  • Maine: June 10 to 14
  • Maryland: June 4 to 23
  • Massachusetts: June 1 to 14
  • Michigan: June 3 to 21
  • Minnesota: June 4 to 13
  • Mississippi: June 4 to 21
  • Missouri: June 1 to 22
  • Montana: June 2 to 6
  • Nebraska: June 1 to 5
  • Nevada: June 1 to 10
  • New Hampshire: June 5
  • New Jersey: June 1 to 5
  • New Mexico: June 1 to 20
  • New York: June 1 to 9
  • North Carolina: June 3 to 21
  • North Dakota: June 1
  • Ohio: June 2 to 20
  • Oklahoma: June 1 to 10
  • Oregon: June 1 to 9
  • Pennsylvania: Over the 1st 10 business days in June 2025
  • Rhode Island: June 1
  • South Carolina: June 1 to 10
  • South Dakota: June 10
  • Tennessee: June 1 to 20
  • Texas: June 1 to 28
  • Utah: June 5, 11, and 15
  • Vermont: June 1
  • Virginia: June 1 to 7
  • Washington: June 1 to 20
  • West Virginia: June 1 to 9
  • Wisconsin: June 1 to 15
  • Wyoming: June 1 to 4
  • Guam: June 1 to 10
  • Puerto Rico: June 4 to 22
  • The District of Columbia: June 1 to 10
  • The U.S. Virgin Islands: June 1

Are the maximum SNAP amounts the same in May as in June 2025?

As a matter of fact, all the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits will be the same through September 30, 2025. Then, there will be new amounts after the 2026 COLA.

Amounts may increase, but they may also see reductions. It depends on inflation. Here are the maximum amounts you can receive in one of the 48 contiguous States in June:

Advertisement

Household Size and 48 States & DC
1 member: $292
2 members: $536
3 members: $768
4 members: $975
5 members: $1,158
6 members: $1,390
7 members: $1,536
8 members: $1,756
Each additional person is $220



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending