Connect with us

Alaska

Report: Internal emails at Alaska Permanent Fund show financial manager raising ethical concerns about fund’s vice chair

Published

on

Report: Internal emails at Alaska Permanent Fund show financial manager raising ethical concerns about fund’s vice chair


A top financial manager with the $80 billion Alaska Permanent Fund Corp. in emails raised concerns about efforts by the fund’s vice chair to set up meetings between Permanent Fund staff and business associates or companies with ties to a company she owns.

The emails were first obtained and published on the website Alaska Landmine. Landmine owner Jeff Landfield declined to say who provided the emails to him.

Marcus Frampton, the fund’s chief executive officer, asserts in the emails that Ellie Rubenstein, vice chair of the fund’s board of trustees, has conflicts that involve business associates with ties to Manna Tree Partners, her private equity firm.

Advertisement

The emails were sent to Frampton’s colleagues at the fund, including the fund’s chief executive, Deven Mitchell, who replies to one email to thank Frampton for keeping him and other colleagues “in the loop.”

Frampton declined to comment for this story. Rubenstein, the co-founder and managing partner at Manna Tree, said in a statement that she follows the corporation’s ethical rules.

Frampton in the email asserts the conflicts include Rubenstein’s father, billionaire David Rubenstein, co-founder of the Carlyle Group, one of the world’s largest private equity firms. Carlyle is an external private equity manager for the Permanent Fund that handles close to $500 million in commitments for the fund. David Rubenstein is also a limited partner in Manna Tree. Ellie Rubenstein’s mother is Alice Rogoff, who purchased the Anchorage Daily News in 2014, changed its name to Alaska Dispatch News and owned the company until it filed for bankruptcy protection in 2017.

Frampton suggests in the emails that Ellie Rubenstein has worked to set up meetings between the staff and investors with whom she has financial ties, in ways that could benefit those associates or their businesses.

She apparently wants to reshape the fund’s “private credit” asset class, Frampton said in an email.

Advertisement

She has also called for the firing of a Permanent Fund investment analyst her father was apparently displeased with, after the analyst met with her father, Frampton writes.

Allen Waldrop, the head of private equity investments for the fund, also sent an email providing context to say that Ellie Rubenstein coordinated directly with the investment analyst to arrange the meeting during a trip.

“This was not something we discussed in advance nor did we plan when we arranged the trip,” Waldrop said in the email.

Rubenstein said in a prepared statement this week that she follows the corporation’s rules involving ethics and disclosures. In one of the emails disclosed in the release, she told a Permanent Fund manager in “full disclosure” about her business ties to a limited partner in Manna Tree.

“Introducing and connecting Permanent Fund Staff to investment firms so that they can explore opportunities is an appropriate and valuable role and is common practice among state pension boards, endowments, and sovereign wealth funds,” Rubenstein said in the statement to the Daily News.

Advertisement

“In this role, I have always followed the Permanent Fund board’s ethics rules and disclosure requirements, and I was unaware of these concerns about my service on the board,” she said.

“That someone leaked internal messages containing confidential information to the media is disturbing; it is a breach of policy and trust, and it distracts from the important work the Permanent Fund trustees and staff are doing for the state of Alaska,” she said.

The state corporation’s Board of Trustees will hold a virtual special meeting Wednesday to discuss the breach. The public can tune in. But the board may enter executive session in private because discussions about potential vulnerabilities could cause financial harm, according to an online public notice.

The Daily News requested the emails as well as text messages referred to in the emails, through a public records request. The agency is processing the request according to the law, said Paulyn Swanson, spokeswoman with the fund. “At this time, we anticipate fulfilling this request within the standard 10 business day time frame and will let you know if an extension is required,” she wrote in an email Monday.

‘Conflicts of interest’

Ellie Rubenstein has encouraged staff to engage with business associates or companies with ties to Manna Tree, Frampton asserts in his emails. But while staff members attended meetings in some cases, they took no action in response, he wrote.

Advertisement

In a Jan. 16 email, Frampton wrote that a “serious” and “uncomfortable” topic involves Rubenstein’s “conflicts of interest.”

Frampton shared the writing with Mitchell as well as Sebastian Vadakumcherry, the fund’s chief risk and compliance officer.

Rubenstein has made “dozens upon dozens of investment manager referrals” in her year and a half on the Permanent Fund board, Frampton wrote.

“Many of these have been in the private credit space and my team has declined to pursue all of them,” Frampton said in the email.

The Alaska Permanent Fund’s private credit asset class was valued last year at $2.1 billion.

Advertisement

Private credit often involves the issuing of loans to private companies. The loans can support private equity companies as they acquire businesses, according to the fund’s 2023 annual report.

Frampton said in the email that he gathers that Rubenstein wants to see larger investments in private credit and a change in staff who manage it.

A ‘fairly emphatic pitch’

In his Jan. 16 email, Frampton highlighted some of the specific actions by Ellie Rubenstein that he said constitute conflicts of interest.

One example involved TCW, an alternative investment management firm that is a subsidiary of the Carlyle Group, according to Frampton’s email.

Several of TCW’s senior principals are limited partners in Manna Tree, he said.

Advertisement

Frampton said that Ellie Rubenstein texted him last year with a “fairly emphatic pitch” that the Permanent Fund “pursue an investment in private credit with TCW,” he wrote.

Frampton’s team reviewed the potential investment and declined to pursue it, he said in the email.

‘All good on APFC?’

In another example cited by Frampton, he said Ellie Rubenstein encouraged Alaska Permanent Fund staff to review Churchill Asset Management, a private credit firm.

The firm is run by Ken Kencel, who “personally is a client of Manna Tree,” and is a former Carlyle executive, Frampton said in his email.

Frampton’s email referenced an earlier email thread he’d received from Ellie Rubenstein in October, in which she wanted to set up a meeting between Kencel and Frampton.

Advertisement

In the email to Kencel and Frampton, Rubenstein said “full disclosure” and explained that Kencel is a limited partner with a Manna Tree fund.

The thread also included an email from Ellie Rubenstein to Kencel. In the thread, she asked Kencel, “all good on APFC?”

Frampton asserted in his email that Rubenstein was essentially asking Kencel “how his efforts on soliciting money from APFC is going.”

Chris Ullman, a spokesperson for Ellie Rubenstein, said in an email, “Ellie was seeking to confirm that Mr. Kencel’s emails had been returned by the staff. This is a staff responsiveness and accountability issue, as she has noted publicly before.”

A ‘difficult interaction’

In an email on Feb. 5 to colleagues, Frampton indicates he met with Harvey Schwartz, the chief executive of Carlyle, during a trip in a meeting “indirectly arranged” by Ellie Rubenstein.

Advertisement

Frampton said he told Schwartz the Permanent Fund has an “expansive and robust” relationship with Carlyle.

But Schwartz disagreed with that, and said he hopes to do more business with the Permanent Fund, Frampton said in the email.

In that email, Frampton also said he met with Ellie Rubenstein, who told him the investment analyst who did not impress her father should be fired. Ellie Rubenstein also said Tim Andreyka should not be the fund’s real estate asset investor. Frampton said he did his best to engage her in a “neutral fashion,” according to the email.

Mitchell, the fund’s chief executive, replied to say he believed that Frampton had handled “this difficult interaction as professionally as possible.”

Frampton in his Jan. 16 email wrote that Rubenstein may have conflicts that are clouding her views toward the Permanent Fund staff and operations.

Advertisement

“A reasonable person might wonder if her current position is some sort of retaliation for rebuffing” investment referrals such as those involving companies like TCW or Churchill, Frampton wrote.

Board, staff reviewing ‘all relevant information’

The Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act says public officers should conduct business in a way that avoids conflicts of interest. A public officer can’t attempt to use “an official position for personal gain, and may not intentionally secure or grant unwarranted benefits or treatment for any person,” it says.

Gov. Mike Dunleavy appointed Rubenstein to the fund’s six-member Board of Trustees in June 2022. He has appointed or reappointed all its members.

The governor can remove a public board member “only for cause,” according to state law.

The governor said in a press conference last week that the issue involving Ellie Rubenstein is a matter for the Permanent Fund board to address internally.

Advertisement

Permanent Fund chair Ethan Schutt was informed about staff’s concerns with Rubenstein in late January, “due to the seriousness of the concerns raised,” said Swanson, the spokeswoman with the fund. Leadership at the fund “continued its evaluation and monitoring of the situation,” she said in a statement.

“Currently, staff and the Board of Trustees are working together to further review all relevant information in order to identify appropriate next steps,” Swanson said.

Schutt sees the staff’s concerns as legitimate, he said in an interview Thursday. He said those concerns were communicated internally through the proper channels.

He said it’s also a concern to him that the documents were somehow released to the public in an “uncontrolled” manner.

Schutt said he does not have an opinion on whether Rubenstein overstepped her bounds or is taking steps to benefit the interests of Manna Tree or her business associates.

Advertisement

Before he could attempt to draw any conclusions on those questions, he would need more information about what happened, he said.

“We would have to decide as a body to have somebody undertake this exercise and we have not done that,” Schutt said.

As for the fund’s asset allocation to various asset classes, those are determined by a vote of the board, he said.

In Frampton’s Feb. 5 email, he said he’d been told by Trustee Rubenstein that he “should know that Schutt will not be reappointed by the governor when his term is up this June.”

Schutt said in the interview that he had no idea if that was the case. He said the decision rests with the governor.

Advertisement

Some lawmakers in Juneau last week said in interviews that it’s inappropriate for a trustee to try to have a worker fired.

State Sen. Bill Wielechowski, D-Anchorage, said he thinks there should be hearings into the issue.

Sen. Jesse Kiehl, D-Juneau, indicated that Permanent Fund staff must be pretty concerned about Ellie Rubenstein if they’re documenting her actions.

Rep. Calvin Schrage, an Anchorage independent and the House minority leader, said he was concerned that the Permanent Fund is being politicized.

The Daily News’ Alex DeMarban reported from Anchorage, and reporters Sean Maguire and Iris Samuels contributed from Juneau.

Advertisement





Source link

Alaska

These lines are adding Alaska cruises. Is your favorite on the list?

Published

on

These lines are adding Alaska cruises. Is your favorite on the list?



New Alaska voyages debut in 2026 as lines like MSC Cruises and Virgin Voyages expand into the booming market.

play

Travelers will have new ways to see Alaska this year.

A number of cruise lines are launching sailings to the Last Frontier in 2026, from luxury to large family-friendly and adults-only ships. About 65% of people visiting the state during the summer do so by cruise ship, according to Cruise Lines International Association Alaska, and demand is high.

“I think Alaska is always very popular, but we’re seeing that ships are selling out way quicker than they used to,” Joanna Kuther, a travel agent and owner of Port Side Travel Consultants, told USA TODAY. 

With new inventory opening up this season, here’s what travelers should know about Alaska cruises.

Advertisement

Which cruise lines are adding Alaska sailings?

  • MSC Cruises will launch its first-ever Alaska sailings aboard MSC Poesia on May 11. The ship will be fresh from dry dock to add enhancements, including the line’s luxe ship-within-a-ship concept, the MSC Yacht Club.
  • Virgin Voyages’ newest ship, Brilliant Lady, will operate the company’s inaugural Alaska cruises. The adults-only cruise line will set sail there starting on May 21.
  • The Ritz-Carlton Yacht Collection will debut its first Alaska cruises this year on its Luminara vessel. The first of those sailings will depart on May 28.

Those join other operators like Holland America Line, Princess Cruises, American Cruise Lines, Norwegian Cruise Line, Royal Caribbean International, Disney Cruise Line, Celebrity Cruises and more.

What are the draws of Alaska cruises?

Glaciers are a major attraction for visitors. “One of the major (draws) is Glacier Bay,” said Kuther. “…And then the other one is definitely the wildlife.”

That includes bears, whales, moose and salmon. In addition to its many natural wonders, the state is also a cultural destination where visitors can learn about its Native peoples.

Advertisement

When is the best time to take an Alaska cruise?

That depends what you’re looking for. The Alaska cruise season generally runs from April through October, and Kuther said visitors will tend to see more wildlife between the end of June through August.

“That’s super peak season,” she said. “That’s also where you’re going to have more families, more crowds.” Some locals have also said those crowds are putting a strain on the very environment tourists are there to see.

Travelers may find less packed ships and ports by visiting earlier or later in the season – and there are other perks. If passengers go in May “it’s still a little bit snowy, so your scenery is going to be really cool,” Kuther said. Travelers visiting in September or October, meanwhile, could have a better shot at seeing the northern lights.

Where do ships usually sail?

The most popular itinerary is the Inside Passage, according to Kuther. That often sails round-trip from Seattle or Vancouver with stops such as Juneau, Skagway and Ketchikan. “People will go back to Alaska and do different routes,” she said. “This is a very good way to start.” 

Advertisement

Other options include one-way cruises between Vancouver or Seattle and Anchorage. Travelers can also take cruisetours that combine sailings with land-based exploration, including train rides and tours of Denali National Park and Preserve.

Tips for Alaska cruises

  • Book early: Alaska itineraries sell out quickly, and so do shore excursions. Unique offerings like helicopter tours and dog sledding are popular, and there are only so many spots.
  • Consider a balcony cabin: This is “almost a must” in Kuther’s opinion. Crew members may make announcements about whales or other sightings near the ship, and guests with their own private viewing spot won’t have to race out on deck.
  • Pack carefully: “Packing is an art when it comes to Alaska,” Kuther said. “It really is, because you need so many things.” Her top three picks are bug spray, layers of clothing for the fluctuating temperatures and a waterproof jacket in case of rain.

Nathan Diller is a consumer travel reporter for USA TODAY based in Nashville. You can reach him at ndiller@usatoday.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaska lawmakers push Trump administration to waive $100k visa fee for international teachers

Published

on

Alaska lawmakers push Trump administration to waive 0k visa fee for international teachers


Some Alaska school districts say they can’t afford to hire and retain international teachers after the Trump administration hiked fees for highly skilled worker visas.  Alaska school districts have increasingly hired international teachers through the H-1B program amid an ongoing teacher shortage. Until last September, the annual fee for such visas was $5,000 per person. […]



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaska’s voter roll transfer: Republicans bash hearing questioning if lieutenant governor broke the law

Published

on

Alaska’s voter roll transfer: Republicans bash hearing questioning if lieutenant governor broke the law


JUNEAU, Alaska (KTUU) – A legislative hearing into the legality of Alaska’s voter roll transfer to the federal government ended in partisan accusations Monday, with one Republican calling it a “set-up” and others saying it was unnecessary, while Democrats defended it as needed oversight.

“Andrew (Gray) and the committee has a bias. I mean, that much is obvious from watching it,” Rep. Kevin McCabe, R-Big Lake, told Alaska’s News Source walking out of the hearing before it gaveled out. “Most of the testimony was slanted against the state and against the federal government.”

The House State Affairs and Judiciary committees met jointly Monday to hear testimony about whether Dahlstrom violated the law when she transferred the entirety of Alaska’s voter rolls to the federal government.

Rep. Steve St. Clair, R-Wasilla, agreed with his Big Lake counterpart that the hearing was unnecessary.

Advertisement

“I think we’re speculating on what the intent of the DOJ is and I believe we need to wait and see,” he said.

Rep. Andrew Gray, D-Anchorage and chair of the House Judiciary Committee, pushed back when told of his Republican colleagues’ reaction.

“I think that I went above and beyond to try to include everybody,” Gray said as he left the meeting. “If people are saying that if the Obama administration had asked for the unredacted voter rolls from Alaska, that all these Republicans around here would have just been like, ‘oh, take it all. Take all of our information.’

“That is not true. That is absolutely not true,” Gray added.

Rep. Ted Eischeid, D-Anchorage, backed his House majority colleague, questioning whether Republicans would have preferred if the topic not be addressed at all.

Advertisement

“The minority folks on the committee had a chance to ask questions,” he said. “I think this is a meeting we needed to have. Alaskans have asked for it. I think there’s still a lot of unanswered questions. So shedding light on the state’s actions, that’s bias?”

Dahlstrom did not attend the hearing. Gray said she was invited multiple times but cited scheduling conflicts. The lieutenant governor oversees the Alaska Division of Elections under state law.

In her most recent public statement — published Feb. 25 on her gubernatorial campaign website, not through her official office — Dahlstrom defended the voter roll transfer, saying the agreement with the DOJ was “lawful, limited” and that Alaska retains full authority over its voter rolls.

“The DOJ cannot remove a single voter from our rolls,” she wrote. “Its role is limited to identifying potential issues, such as duplicate registrations or individuals who may have moved or passed away.”

Representatives from the state’s Department of Law and Division of Elections both testified in defense of Dahlstrom’s decision. Rachel Witty, the Department of Law’s director of legal services, told the committee the state viewed the DOJ’s purview.

Advertisement

“The DOJ’s enforcement authority is quite broad,” Witty said. “And so, we interpreted their request as being used to evaluate and enforce HAVA compliance.”

HAVA — the Help America Vote Act — is a federal law that sets election administration standards for states.

Lawmakers also heard from an assortment of outside witnesses who largely questioned the legality of Dahlstrom’s actions, including former Lt. Gov. Loren Leman, who served under Republican Gov. Frank Murkowski, and former Attorney General Bruce Botelho, who served under Democratic Gov. Tony Knowles.

The Documents: A Months-Long Timeline

As part of the hearing, the committee released months’ worth of documents between the Department of Justice — led by Attorney General Pam Bondi — and Dahlstrom’s office, detailing the effort to transfer Alaska’s voter rolls over to Washington.

The DOJ first asked Dahlstrom to release the voter rolls in July of last year, citing the 1993 National Voter Registration Act, which requires states to allow federal inspection of “official lists of eligible voters.”

Advertisement

Dahlstrom agreed to release the records in August, providing a list of voters designated as “inactive” and “non-citizens,” along with their voting records and the statewide voter registration list — but it did not include what the DOJ wanted.

“As the Attorney General requested, the electronic copy of the statewide [voter registration list] must contain all fields,” reads an email sent 10 days after Dahlstrom agreed to release the data, “including the registrant’s full name, date of birth, residential address, his or her state driver’s license number or the last four digits of the registrant’s social security number.”

Dahlstrom agreed to provide the full details months later, in December, citing a state statute that permits sharing confidential information with a federal agency if it uses “the information only for governmental purposes authorized under law.” Those purposes, she wrote in the email, are to “test, analyze and assess the State’s compliance with federal laws.”

“I attach some significance to the fact that it took the State … nearly four months to respond to the Department of Justice’s demand,” former AG Botelho told the committee.

That same day, Dahlstrom, Alaska Division of Elections Director Carol Beecher and DOJ Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon signed a memorandum of understanding governing how the data could be accessed, used, and protected.

Advertisement

Dahlstrom’s office publicly announced the transfer nine days after the MOU was signed — nearly six months after the DOJ first made its request.

“Alaska is committed to the integrity of our elections and to complying with applicable law,” Dahlstrom said in the December statement. “Upon receiving the DOJ’s request, the Division of Elections, in consultation with the Department of Law, provided the voter registration list in accordance with federal requirements and state authority, while ensuring appropriate safeguards for sensitive information.”

A 10-page legal analysis from legislative counsel Andrew Dunmire, requested by House Majority Whip Rep. Zack Fields, D-Anchorage, concluded that the DOJ’s demand defied legal bounds.

“The DOJ’s request for state voter data is unprecedented,” Dunmire’s analysis states, adding that the legal justification the DOJ used to demand access to the data has never been applied this way before.

“Multiple states refused DOJ’s request, which has resulted in litigation that is now working its way through federal courts across the country,” he adds.

Advertisement

The Senate holds an identical hearing Wednesday, when its State Affairs and Judiciary committees take up the same questions.

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending