Connect with us

Alaska

Judge orders delay in certification of Alaska’s U.S. House special primary; state appeals

Published

on

Judge orders delay in certification of Alaska’s U.S. House special primary; state appeals


An Alaska state decide dominated Friday that the outcomes of the particular U.S. Home main election couldn’t be licensed till visually impaired voters are given “a full and truthful alternative to vote independently, secretly and privately.” The state appealed the choice to the Alaska Supreme Court docket.

The ruling, from Anchorage Superior Court docket Choose Choose Una Gandbhir, got here after arguments earlier within the day in a lawsuit filed earlier this week by the Alaska State Fee for Human Rights in opposition to the Alaska Division of Election and Lt. Gov. Keven Meyer, who oversees the division. The fee asserted that the first, which is the state’s first all-mail election, doesn’t present visually impaired voters within the state ample voting entry.

The ramifications of the courtroom choice on the continued election weren’t instantly clear. The courtroom didn’t direct any adjustments to voting by people who aren’t visually impaired.

Advertisement

The order comes only a day earlier than the Saturday voting deadline. It may upend a plan to carry the particular normal election on Aug. 16 and drive an all-mail normal election, in line with the Division of Elections.

“No courtroom ought to think about evenly an injunction that doubtlessly upends an ongoing election, however neither can the Court docket permit flawed state procedures to disenfranchise a bunch of Alaskans who already face great limitations in exercising a elementary proper,” Gandbhir wrote in her choice to grant the preliminary injunction.

[Saturday is the deadline for Alaskans to send in ballots in the special U.S. House primary. Candidates are still scrambling to win them.]

The choice doesn’t specify what giving visually impaired voters “a full and truthful” alternative to vote would entail, however Gandbhir wrote she “urges the events to work collectively expeditiously to discover a well timed, acceptable treatment.”

Attorneys for the Division of Elections filed an emergency petition to the Alaska Supreme Court docket asking them to reverse the injunction.

Advertisement

“This can shut down the particular main election, with cascading scheduling penalties that can make an in-person particular normal election not possible,” they argued in a courtroom submitting.

Attorneys for the fee have till Saturday at 9 a.m. to file their response.

Division of Elections spokesperson Tiffany Montemayor stated she couldn’t reply questions concerning the impacts of the courtroom case on main voting, as a result of the division nonetheless didn’t know what these impacts could be.

The certification of election outcomes is at the moment scheduled to happen June 25, two weeks after the voting deadline on Saturday.

“There wouldn’t be something preliminary about an injunction right here. It might have the impact of stopping an election that occurs tomorrow,” Kate Demarest, an lawyer representing the Division of Elections, stated throughout a courtroom listening to on Friday.

Advertisement

Demarest stated the June 25 certification objective is “the true drop-dead date as a way to accomplish the actually vital objective” of holding the final election in-person on Aug. 16 as at the moment scheduled. Delaying the certification, she stated, may drive the division to carry the particular normal election — which would be the state’s first ranked-choice voting election — totally by mail, and at a later date than Aug. 16, which may also be the first voting day for all November races.

“That may be a consequence that I feel all of us agree shouldn’t be within the division’s curiosity, not within the plaintiff’s curiosity definitely and it’s not within the public’s curiosity,” Demarest stated. “And it might prolong Alaska’s lack of illustration within the Home of Representatives even longer.”

The human rights fee argued that the all-mail ballots aren’t accessible to visually impaired voters with out help from a seeing particular person, and that options at the moment supplied by the division are insufficient.

These options embrace providing accessible voting machines in only a handful of the 170 in-person voting locations throughout the state. Such gadgets are usually supplied in all polling places. Division director Gail Fenumiai has stated that they don’t seem to be obtainable in all places as a result of the division had solely weeks to arrange for the particular election triggered by the sudden demise of U.S. Home Rep. Don Younger in March.

[Q&A: How to vote in Alaska’s first all-mail election]

Advertisement

The fee additionally argued that the choice of downloading and filling out a poll on-line — which visually impaired voters can do utilizing accessible software program — is inadequate as a result of they have to then print the poll and place it in a secrecy sleeve and envelope, which requires the help of a seeing particular person.

“Placing the burden of drawback fixing this difficulty on the visually impaired voters is inconsistent with the legislation,” stated Mara Michaletz, the lawyer representing the fee, which filed the lawsuit on behalf of Bonnie Lucas, a visually impaired Anchorage voter.

“It’s actually the appropriate factor. I do know it’s an imposition for the Division of Elections,” stated Lucas, who serves as president of the Alaska chapter of the Nationwide Federation of the Blind. Lucas stated she has reached out to the division beforehand to enhance voting entry, however “we’ve by no means felt like voting was actually accessible.”

A number of states confronted lawsuits by visually impaired voters in 2020, when many turned to all-mail voting in response to the coronavirus pandemic. Many modified their voting choices in response.

“If somebody had been pondering and noting what was occurring within the different states, they might have been beginning to get the whole lot prepared so that everybody may vote and everybody may vote a secret and accessible poll,” Lucas stated.

Advertisement

In line with a 2016 survey by the Nationwide Federation of the Blind, there are round 17,600 Alaskans with a visible incapacity.

Blind and visually impaired voters stated in interviews that voting has been difficult for them in earlier elections — not simply the present, all-mail one. And a number of other stated the lawsuit was wanted.

“I completely do suppose it’s warranted,” stated Rick Webb, who serves on the board of the Alaska Heart for the Blind and Visually Impaired. Beforehand, he stated he relied on his spouse to vote, however that made him uncomfortable sufficient that he stopped.

“We don’t essentially see eye to eye on how you can vote,” Webb stated. “For all I do know, she’s voting the way in which she wished, not the way in which I wished. I had no approach of understanding.”

Nate Kile, program director on the Alaska Heart for the Blind and Visually Impaired, stated he has used the accessible voting machines in earlier elections. However even when the machines can be found, the scenario isn’t excellent. Kile stated in a single election, he merely gave up after ballot employees didn’t function the accessible voting machine, and as an alternative relied on a ballot employee to fill out the poll for him.

Advertisement

“I allowed one of many volunteers there to help me with the voting. Some individuals wouldn’t tolerate that,” Kile stated. “We wish individuals to have the appropriate for that anonymity, however they only didn’t know how you can use (the machine) on the time.”

Lucas stated she waited for an hour for polling employees to determine how you can function the accessible voting machines when she voted within the 2020 presidential elections.

A number of states permit voting totally by laptop for visually impaired voters. Lucas and others stated that may be the best answer.

“I do know some individuals simply actually don’t fear about voting,” Lucas stated, as a result of they discover it too difficult. “Loads of individuals have gone to make use of the (accessible) machine, and it’s simply not obtainable.”

Within the 2020 election, visually impaired Ketchikan resident Sarah Fitzgerald stated she had to assist election employees determine how you can function the accessible voting machine.

Advertisement

“It was nearly like I used to be the one with the data about how low imaginative and prescient tech normally works, and so they have been asking me for clarification,” she stated. “So it was a really irritating expertise, and it made me singled out.”

“And we by no means did get it to work. I once more needed to depend on a sighted individual to then take me in and do my poll, which then means I don’t have a totally non-public poll, like each different sighted individual does,” Fitzgerald stated.

Within the particular U.S. Home race main, she stated she had an acquaintance help her in filling out her mail-in poll.

“Once more, I don’t have the identical privateness as some other sighted individual would,” she stated.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

The polar bear and the bird scientist: George Divoky’s 50-year Arctic vigil

Published

on

The polar bear and the bird scientist: George Divoky’s 50-year Arctic vigil


COOPER ISLAND — On July 2, George Divoky woke with a polar bear right outside the cabin. He had dressed warmly for sleep in case of an emergency. He rose to grab a shotgun.

Divoky moves stiffly. He is 78. He lifts himself to standing with his arms. Every day of the summer he gets up and down like this dozens of times on the barren gravel of Cooper Island to inspect the nests of black guillemots, weigh chicks and band fledglings. He has worked here for decades, mostly alone, to document how the warming climate has affected these birds in Alaska’s Arctic.

A young bear had come into camp, up to Divoky’s weather-beaten plywood shack, which is no larger than a lawn shed. Another large young bear and the mother were out in the bird colony, among the nests.

Advertisement

Divoky raised his shotgun and fired cracker shells to scare the bears. They ran westward over the table-flat ground, away from the nests and camp.

Out in the colony area, the bears had systematically flipped nest boxes to get at the eggs. Divoky had put out the boxes, cutting holes in hard-shelled plastic suitcases, and for years they had kept the birds mostly safe from bears. But now the bears seemed to have figured them out, or they cared more.

Divoky came back in to make coffee and oatmeal on the camp stove. He warmed up. The temperature was in the 40s with an unrelenting, sharp wind, and it wasn’t much warmer inside. Two winters previously, bears had ripped off the back wall of the shack and destroyed the insulation.

When Divoky went out again, bears had been back at the nests. Motion-sensitive cameras showed them shaking the nest boxes until the birds emerged.

He found a guillemot’s severed leg, with one of his tiny dataloggers attached, a device for tracking birds during the winter. He recognized the bands on another leg, which he had attached to a fledgling many years earlier. Gray-green-green. And here were pieces of a bird he thought of as an old friend. He had checked its nest and measured its young every summer since 2002.

Advertisement

Divoky first came to Cooper Island in 1972, and this summer was his 50th consecutive field season. In total, he has logged more than 10 years on the rusty-red gravel.

But perhaps this summer would be his last extended stay. After surveying all the nests July 2, he found that the bears had destroyed half of them. Only 10 remained with eggs. And four adults had died out of only 40 still nesting.

At one time, there were so many guillemots here that Divoky could barely manage, even with his younger bones. Birds were so plentiful that they would try to build nests under the fly of his tent.

“You should have been here when there was 600 birds and you couldn’t walk,” he said. “There was a time when this cabin had birds all over the roof walking on it, and now I haven’t had one bird land on the cabin this year. I’ve experienced this thing and it was very unique. And I wish I hadn’t.

“But really,” he continued, “You could not look away from the train wreck. It was like, OK, what do you think is going to happen next year?”

Advertisement

He speaks rapidly, without breaks for air, and he isn’t easy to quote, because he jumps from idea to memory to theory and back to a new idea, rarely finishing a step. He’s charming and funny. But he likes to be alone. As a teen in a suburb of Cleveland, he was so anxious about speaking in school he would escape and go watch birds instead.

“There are birds out here that are over 25 years old that I’ve known since they were a nestling,” he said. “If I was in Seattle next June, and not up here — wondering what gray-yellow-green is doing and if it’s still with white-red-white. That’s my universe now. I’d have to satisfy my curiosity.”

• • •

Black guillemots spend their entire lives at sea except when they nest. They look much like the pigeon guillemots found in Southcentral Alaska — black and streamlined, with white patches on their wings — but they depend on sea ice, feeding on fish that live at the ice edge. They rarely nest in Arctic Alaska, where the shore is generally flat, because they need rocky cliffsides for protection from predators.

But when Divoky was in his mid-20s, he found a small flock on this island east of Barrow (the town now called Utqiagvik), nesting in wooden crates and ammo boxes left behind by the military. The relatively easy access created an opportunity to study the species.

Advertisement

As a young ornithologist, Divoky observed, banded and measured the birds, daily weighing chicks that look like balls of black down with tiny beaks and claws. Scientifically, he established basic facts.

Most such projects last five years or less. But even when he lost funding, in 1981, Divoky kept his study alive. Long-term data is critical for tracking change in the environment, and he was already seeing change.

The black guillemot colony was rapidly growing, increasing from a couple of dozen nests to 200 in a decade. There might have been more, but Divoky built only 200 wooden nesting boxes. He didn’t have time to study more than 200 pairs.

Divoky eventually matched the birds’ success to a lengthening summer period without snow. They laid eggs 14 days after snowmelt and needed the ground to remain free of snow until nestlings were ready to fledge. Before the mid-1970s, that period without snow had been iffy, but now it was growing.

Without funding, Divoky slept in a tent on hard, frozen gravel, bundled in layers of vests and parkas against frigid, foggy winds that rarely cease and produce constant noise. The barrier island is utterly flat and devoid of vegetation except for a few grassy patches where Iñupiaq hunters butchered whales long ago, perhaps in ancient times, leaving bones and blood that still fertilize the ground.

Advertisement

No one comes here. It takes more than an hour by boat from Utqiagvik. Some years in the 1980s, Divoky worked on the island for 13 weeks of summer without communications, resupply or human contact. Only his girlfriend in Seattle even knew he was there.

But Divoky said the offseason was harder than time on the island. He could only work jobs that would give him three months free for summer research.

“For the first 25 years of the study, I was in a series of relationships that I wasn’t that happy in, and so I didn’t really miss anything,” he said. “I mean, I did miss people, but they didn’t miss me, which is why they typically started a new relationship in my absence.”

Divoky jests that he created a database on human female mate fidelity at the same time he was learning similar facts about the guillemots. He always has a theory, and his theory is that his 13-week absence interfered with a hormonal bonding period. In 1999, he added, he was lucky to meet Catherine Smith in November, so there was time to complete that process before he left for the island.

But for all this scientific bravado, the love between Divoky and Smith runs deep. Last April, when he was giving a presentation at Seattle’s Town Hall, Divoky put up a picture of her, when they were first in the Arctic together. Suddenly, he couldn’t speak.

Advertisement

Smith, 70, is a successful appellate attorney in Seattle. Divoky is imaginative and scattered. She is practical and efficient. She goes to the island for visits — she was there when the polar bears came through on July 2 — gently organizing his chaotic space and managing his overlooked details. She follows along, thoroughly wrapped in winter clothes, as he checks the nests.

When they met, Divoky had funding again. His study was unmistakably tracking environmental change. The guillemot colony showed what was happening in the ocean — first as the longer summers had allowed more breeding, and then as the receding ice robbed the birds of food and their numbers began to decline.

Divoky had found one of the first clear biological examples of climate change.

He recalled, at 16, finding a blue jay on his family’s lawn, shivering and incapacitated, and feeling it die in his hands. The trees had just been sprayed with DDT for Dutch elm disease. He read Rachel Carson’s “Silent Spring” and saw how her book helped ban that poison and energized the 1960s environmental movement.

“Early on everyone was thinking, ‘What is going to be the “Silent Spring” book on climate change?’” Divoky said. “What is it that’s going to get people aware that this is a threat?”

Advertisement

And for a time, it looked like it might be his guillemots.

A journalist writing for The New York Times Sunday Magazine came to the island in 2001 and wrote a long article that appeared in January 2002. The piece suddenly made Divoky and his guillemots famous. It told the climate story, but it captured readers’ hearts with Divoky’s story, beginning with a hilarious description of his hapless efforts to protect the tents from polar bears with a sagging tripwire.

Days after the article ran, the David Letterman show called to book Divoky. He flew to New York for the afternoon taping. That evening, someone working for Robert Redford wanted to meet about making a movie. Woody Harrelson also sent word, asking Divoky to come to L.A. — begging him as if for a special favor.

“I’m thinking, if I could fly to L.A. and smoke dope in a hot tub with Woody Harrelson, then the whole reason for doing the study is clear,” Divoky joked.

That never happened, but a book deal for the Times writer did. Divoky appeared on network news shows and Alan Alda’s science show. Later someone wrote a play and Divoky saw himself portrayed walking around Cooper Island, conversing with his younger self, onstage at the Royal National Theatre in London.

Advertisement

But the play flopped and the book was never written, and there never was a movie deal. Cooper Island wasn’t like “Silent Spring.” Climate change isn’t like DDT.

Divoky kept doing his work, with Catherine Smith, who eventually became his wife. He documented the steady decline of the colony and published scientific papers showing climate change linkages. The publicity helped fund his studies through a small nonprofit in Seattle.

But the world largely moved on. As the decades progressed, hurricanes, droughts, wildfires, heat waves, floods and rising seas marked landscapes globally. The federal government listed polar bears as threatened as the sea ice withdrew.

The black guillemot might have been one of the earliest indicators, but Divoky realized that his little colony had become one of the least of all the victims of climate change.

• • •

Advertisement

The polar bears arrived in 2002, after the publicity.

The shorefast ice near Barrow had been weak. That May, 90 Iñupiaq whalers floated away on it, most of them rescued by helicopter. In August, Divoky and his research assistants were living on the island in tents when a storm swept the broken ice pack more than 200 miles from shore, stranding scores of polar bears on the beaches.

Polar bears, and their entire food web, depend on ice. Their huge bodies run on seal fat. They have no comparable source of food on land.

When the ice blew away, bears overran Cooper Island and raided the nests. Divoky and his team had no hard-sided shelter. They endured 36 scary hours before calling for a Barrow Search and Rescue helicopter. The next year was the first with the plywood cabin.

Over years, receding ice stranded more bears, which destroyed more nests. A climate shift brought horned puffins north, which killed guillemot chicks for nest space. And the guillemot’s diet became poorer, with fewer ice-associated Arctic cod and more hard-to-digest sculpin.

Advertisement

After 2009, when only one chick survived those threats, Divoky brought in the plastic cases to replace wooden nesting boxes. The cases defeated most of the bears. But the lack of food persisted. The colony continued to shrink.

Again, he held dying birds in his hands — chicks that starved.

Before the 2024 season, his 50th consecutive in the field, the nonprofit printed commemorative T-shirts. Divoky contacted journalists. The ADN decided to go in mid-August, when Divoky and Smith would be shutting down the camp.

Divoky considered leaving after the July 2 loss of nests. It didn’t make sense to spend another six weeks measuring chicks in just 10 nests. But the birds that had lost their nests started to lay eggs a second time, piquing his interest.

Since the permafrost melted on the island, sand has blown around its surface, sometimes blowing into the nesting boxes. In late July, a bear flipped another nest box. Divoky opened this box to find sand had suffocated one of the chicks.

Advertisement

“One of the chicks was not yet dead. One of the chicks was dying,” he said. “I pick up the bird and I thought, well, maybe it’s going to make it. It was gasping and it couldn’t hold itself upright. But I put it back in, thinking, you know, stranger things have happened.”

That afternoon the chick was dead.

“I experienced that death and that polar bear impact in a very different way. And that got me very depressed.”

He thought of the blue jay in his front yard. His work had not turned the tide of opinion on climate change, and here he was, watching the last birds go.

He wrote an email to discourage the journalists’ visit.

Advertisement

“I have found the conditions out here this summer to be among the worst, if not the worst, of any of the half-century of field seasons,” he wrote. “The weather has gotten cold and windy. The excursions to the colony to check nests and weigh chicks are the equivalent of ‘space walks.’ … Some of the recent nights have been too cold and noisy for me to sleep well and I am taking two or three naps during the day to catch up on sleep.”

In 10 days, however, when a boat carrying Smith and a journalist arrived, he had gone back to being cheerful, welcoming, eccentric George Divoky.

It was cold and intermittently foggy with wind and hard rain roaring. The ice was as far away as it had been during the polar bear invasion in 2002, although that was no longer unusual. Divoky seemed blasé about the bears now, relying on driveway motion detectors for warning.

Early morning on Aug. 12, three bears appeared 150 feet away from the cabin, disrupting bird nests.

Divoky and Smith watched from near the door. The bears had become experts. They knew how to turn the boxes to expel the eggs or force the birds out. A mother bear submerged one of the cases to get the bird out. Then she ate it.

Advertisement

The bears were eating as much as they could of these little birds — not playing with them or taking only certain parts, as they once did. They had been eating grass from the few patches on the island. They were hungry.

Divoky didn’t raise the shotgun. He just watched.

The bears went from box to box, and from one colony area to the next. They were thorough.

When Divoky and Smith surveyed the damage, nothing was left. Just wings, legs and eggshells. Every nest was destroyed, including those with eggs freshly laid after the first bear attack.

Back in the cabin, over breakfast, Divoky explained why he hadn’t fired to scare away the bears.

Advertisement

“They may be cubs of the year that came out of the snow den in the spring. It’s no fun to drive them away. They don’t really want to be here. They want to be on the ice, but the ice is melted. I don’t want them in theory to be here. But what am I? To the extent that apparently fewer and fewer people care what I do, or why I do it, or how I do it,” he said.

“Yes, we did put up bear-proof cases to keep the colony going,” he continued, “but it makes no sense to have a bear patrol that tries to stop any bear disturbance now, when bears on-shore are inevitable every year.”

Now, Divoky said, he and his camp were the interlopers. This harsh island belonged to the bears.

It was time to pack up the camp for the season. Suddenly undetermined were the timing, what mattered, and what to save. Divoky and Smith argued over something trivial. Then he offered her coffee and her voice cracked.

He said, “Come here, come here, come here. It’s going to be OK. OK?”

Advertisement

“Yeah,” she said.

“I mean, we should appreciate, and you should appreciate, since you were here when the bears first showed up, that this is kind of the, I mean, it’s kind of like the logical, if you will, ending.”

Speaking to the ADN journalist’s camera, Divoky explained that it was almost a relief that his summerlong work seasons on the island were over. Asked about that later, Smith said, “He’s trying to talk himself into it.”

“One of the most important things in life is knowing when to leave,” he said that morning. “What’s the day today? Twelfth of August, 2024. That was the day that we don’t have to keep doing this the same way, from now on. And unfortunately, it’s just a climate change signal. It’s possibly one of the least important in terms of the whole global climate change, but it’s been one that we know the arc of, from ‘72, when this colony was nothing, to ‘89, when it was the biggest colony in Alaska, to 2024, when the birds that were still left here, the two dozen pairs, couldn’t raise young because of polar bears, because of sea ice melt.

“And now I’m on the polar bears’ side,” he said. “I’ve become a polar bear advocate. I’m saying I want these polar bears to do well. They’re not going to have the ice much longer. Use the island any way you can, for resting or whatever. But you’re not going to get any guillemots here in the future. And you’ll be able to roam more freely because I won’t be here much at all.”

Advertisement

On his return to Seattle, Divoky felt a strange sense of re-entry — again. Throngs of people were rushing around in cars. People in speeding metal boxes. Where were they going? Didn’t they know the cost? Were they as heedless as the polar bears?

He blamed them more than the bears. The polar bears didn’t melt the ice.

For a time, he hid out at his co-working space to avoid showing his depression to Smith. He tried to work on his data, but lost heart.

But then, he started working with a young scientist interested in analyzing his data. He planned a trip to Toronto to view a new documentary, “The Birdman of Cooper Island.”

He began planning his trip back, next year, at least a brief one, to see what happens next.

Advertisement

Loren Holmes reported from Cooper Island.





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Free pet vaccines attracts record crowd in Anchorage

Published

on

Free pet vaccines attracts record crowd in Anchorage


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Hundreds of Alaskans and their furry friends flocked to Mountain View on Saturday for free pet vaccinations and food.

The organization, Friends of Pets, teamed up with Anchorage Animal Care and Control to sponsor a vaccination clinic for cats and dogs. The Normandy Project also provided free pet food at the clinic and AACA was handing out spay and neuter coupons. In addition to pet services, several groups were providing food and water to those who are low-income and homeless.

“Last spring, we heard that there were a number of dogs that died in camps because they weren’t vaccinated for parvovirus,” said Michele Girault, board president for Friends of Pets. “We wanted to do something to outreach to our community. We had a clinic in May, and then we thought we’d do another one in the fall, and obviously word got out and lots of people are here.”

The clinic opened at 11 a.m. and went until vaccines ran out, which was scheduled for 3 p.m. Organizers had to order 150 vaccines during the event because of the demand. Friends of Pets and AACA held a similar clinic in May and after such a large turnout for Saturday’s clinic, organizers said they plan on holding the vaccination events more often, possibly four times per year.

Advertisement

“It’s super important to make sure your pets are vaccinated,” said Joel Jorgensen, AACA community outreach manager. “If they get outside and they end up at the shelter, I mean, they’re going to be in an environment that has a lot of animals, and environment like that does have disease, especially when animals come in that aren’t vaccinated, so events like this is to help prevent it from even entering our shelter, and then just on the total hole, making sure Anchorage is covered and safe.”

Several churches and homeless outreach organizations provided food and hygiene supplies to people in line. Some had waited as long as two hours for pet vaccines. Duke Russell, who says he’s been providing food for unhoused individuals for several years, says he was invited to join the event and was happy to serve the community.

“We coordinated with the Friends of pets and APD to kind of show our support to the community today,” said Russell. “Basically it’s just some citizens get together and cooperate in mutual aid for those who are unsheltered.”

Some people traveled from as far as Seward to get their pet vaccinated.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

1 dies in floatplane crash on lake near Big Lake

Published

on

1 dies in floatplane crash on lake near Big Lake


By Anchorage Daily News

Updated: 2 hours ago Published: 2 hours ago

PALMER — One person was killed Friday evening after a floatplane crashed into a lake about 10 miles west of Big Lake, authorities say.

The pilot’s wife was a passenger in the plane and was injured but able to swim to shore and get help after the plane went down in Butterfly Lake, Alaska State Troopers said in an online report posted Saturday morning. Emergency dispatchers received the report of the crash at about 7 p.m. Friday.

Advertisement

The woman “reported that her husband was the pilot and was believed to be deceased as he was still in the submerged cockpit long after the crash,” troopers said. No one else was in the plane, which couldn’t be immediately located, they said. Search efforts were halted overnight due to darkness.

Troopers said the woman was transported by LifeMed helicopter to the hospital for treatment of her injuries, which were described as not life-threatening. The search resumed at 6 a.m. Saturday and the partially submerged plane was discovered by a local on East Butterfly Lake, adjacent to Butterfly Lake, troopers said.

An Alaska Wildlife Troopers aircraft was assisting with recovery efforts and a troopers helicopter was en route to the area with dive team members to recover the pilot’s body, troopers said.

The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating.

Ten people have now died in six plane or helicopter crashes in Alaska since the beginning of September, including two separate crashes in mid-September that killed six people.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending