Connect with us

Alaska

Comparing costs among Alaska towns

Published

on

Comparing costs among Alaska towns


Juneau, Alaska (DOL) – Within Alaska, the cost of living tends to be lowest in the largest cities and smaller communities on the road system. Costs rise as populations fall and barriers to access increase.

Between urban areas, costs differ more by the type of expense than overall. Anchorage and Fairbanks rank closely for overall costs, for example, but Anchorage home prices are higher while Fairbanks pays significantly more for utilities.

In other areas, expenses depend on how remote they are.

Everything costs more in rural Alaska, and shipping plays a primary role in those higher costs. Comprehensive cost-of-living measures are scarce
for much of Alaska — the last statewide survey was completed in 2008.1 This article looks at the two broad cost-of-living indexes available, albeit for a limited list of Alaska communities, then drills down to comparisons around the state for two major spending categories, housing and fuel, for which more sources are available.

Advertisement

Two broad in-state cost-of-living indexes cover only some towns

Anchorage, Fairbanks, Juneau, and Kodiak

The most complete cost-of-living measure for in-state comparisons is the Council for Community and Economic Research survey, which the Alaska-U.S. comparisons that begin on page 9 use extensively. (See that article for more about this survey.)

C2ER tracks prices in four Alaska cities: Anchorage, Fairbanks, Juneau, and Kodiak.

All index values are relative to the survey average for the U.S., set at 100.

Advertisement

In 2022, the overall cost of living in the four Alaska cities ranged from a low of 123 in Fairbanks to a high of 129 in Kodiak. In other words, their costs were 23 percent and 29 percent higher than the average, respectively. (See the table on page 10.)

Alaska cities’ overall scores were similar, but some 1The McDowell Group (now McKinley Research), Alaska Geographic
Differential Study 2008 expenditures differed notably.

Juneau and Anchorage have higher housing costs than Kodiak and Fairbanks. Utility costs also vary depending on winter severity and which energy source a city relies on for heat. Fairbanks’ utility costs are far higher than the other cities and were more than double the survey aver-
age (209) in 2022. Fairbanks winters are extreme, and households primarily use heating oil. Utilities were lower in Juneau and Kodiak, where heating oil is also the dominant heat source, according to the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, but winters are milder. Anchorage was the lowest because of its natural gas. (See the fuel section on page 14.)

Grocery prices were lowest in Anchorage and Fairbanks (the largest cities), higher in Juneau, and highest in Kodiak, the smallest.

Apartment rents and single-family home sales prices in select Alaska areas

Advertisement

Notes: Median adjusted rent includes utility costs. Utility adjustments use 2022 data. Percent change is from the same period the previous
year.

*Bethel is new to the survey in 2023. Bethel’s rent does not include the utility adjustment.

Source: Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce Development, Research, and Analysis Section and Alaska Housing Finance Corporation

Examining housing and fuel costs around the state

Sales prices, rents up in all covered areas

Advertisement

Housing costs make up the largest share of most households’ budgets, and many areas saw large increases over the past year.

Each year, in partnership with the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation, DOL conducts statewide quarterly housing market surveys of lenders and an annual rental survey in early March for several areas. (See the tables above.)

In 2022, the average single-family home cost $422,484. Average prices ranged from a low of $337,329 in Fairbanks to a high of $513,119 in Juneau.

Historically, home prices have been higher than the statewide average in Anchorage and Juneau and lower in the Fairbanks North Star, Matanuska-Susitna, and Kenai Peninsula boroughs. Bethel, the only rural area broken out separately, also tends to be high, but prices can be volatile in small areas because just a few transactions can swing the average.

Consistent with national trends, home prices in Alaska have risen considerably in recent years.

Advertisement

In 2022, Alaska’s average sales price rose 8.7 percent after increasing 8.9 percent in 2021. (For more on the current Alaska housing market, see the May 2023 issue of Trends.)

Higher home prices and rents tend to go hand in hand, but rents rank higher than sales prices in Fairbanks and Kodiak, which have large military populations with generous housing stipends.

The University of Alaska Fairbanks is another steady source of rental demand.

In March, the median adjusted rent for a two-bedroom apartment in the Department of Labor’s survey ranged from a low of $1,055 in Wrangell-Petersburg to a high of $1,532 in Anchorage.

Adjusted rent includes the cost of utilities,2 whether they are included in the rent check or paid separately by the tenant.

Advertisement

Rent was highest in Bethel, which DOL added to the survey in 2023, and because Bethel’s rent doesn’t include the adjustment for utilities, it was probably even further above the other areas than the rent table shows.

Rents were higher than the previous March in all areas.

In the five largest markets, rents rose 9 percent in Fairbanks and Mat-Su, 7 percent in the Kenai Peninsula Borough, 5 percent in Anchorage, and 4 percent in Juneau.

Survey samples vary by year and depend on landlord participation, so these numbers can be more volatile in smaller areas.

Inflation, limited availability, and rising costs have pushed rents upward in recent years.

Advertisement

The September 2023 issue of Trends will detail this year’s rental survey results.

This article uses 2022 utility adjustments for 2023 rents, as they were the most recent available at the time of publication.

“During the pandemic, and even a little bit going into the pandemic, Alaska had for the first time in its history, negative inflation. So, prices actually went down. Then prices went way up during COVID. And they’re just coming down now in the most recent data,” Dan Robinson, Chief Researcher and Analyst for the Alaska Department of Labor’s Economic Trends Magazine said while on Action Line. “In terms of the drivers, it’s an unusually messy set of factors because again of the pandemic. What people bought changed, how much people bought changed, supply chain, work chains were disrupted. So, some of what we can tie to the pandemic is kind of going away, things are normalizing. But there are some things, housing being the main one, that are keeping inflation being a little higher than average.”

He talked more about housing.

“When we talk about overall inflation, housing has the largest weight. Which means, it’s what the average consumer spends the highest percentage of their money on, which makes sense. So, what housing does, whether it’s rising or falling, influences disproportionately what’s going on in the overall inflation rate,” Robinson said. “Juneau is interesting and Alaska overall because despite not a lot of population growth for a while, housing has continued to go up. One thing this article talks about though is that lots of U.S. cities have noticeably more expensive housing than any Alaska city. So, as expensive as things are here, you’d have it a lot worse if you lived in Honolulu, San Fransisco, a long list of other cities.”

Advertisement

Double-digit percent jumps in fuel prices

Fuel prices in the 2023 winter survey had risen significantly from last winter’s survey, which was completed before the oil price spike in late February 2022. Heating oil’s survey average, excluding the North Slope, rose 34 percent over the year, from
$5.03 to $6.72 per gallon. Gasoline went from $5.31 to $6.70. While the winter survey showed fuel prices rose significantly over the year in most places, they had fallen in some communities since the summer survey, especially in places where fuel is delivered throughout the year.

Fuel prices fluctuate constantly, but heating oil and gasoline prices remain stable longer in areas that only receive shipments a few times a year.

In winter 2023, many communities were still paying the higher prices of the previous summer, when they received most of the year’s fuel.

While the Alaska fuel price survey is semiannual, national price data collected more frequently show how volatile prices have been over the past few years, and while prices have fallen from the 2022 highs, they remain elevated from most of the previous few years.

Advertisement

National gasoline prices dropped below $2 a gallon in 2020 when the pandemic began, rebounded and continued to rise through 2021, then spiked to around $5 in late February of 2022 after Russia invaded Ukraine.

The most recent data show prices have come down to less than $4.

Public health insurance premiums

For a typical household, medical care is a small share of out-of-pocket spending — but medical costs can be high for some people and rise with age.

Health care is also a major cost for employers, as those who offer it typically pay the lion’s share of the premiums.

Advertisement

Only a small share of Alaskans are insured through the public health care marketplace, but those premiums provide a state-level measure for medical cost comparisons. In 2023, the average benchmark premium for Alaska was $762 per month.

For comparison, the U.S. average was $456. Alaska ranked fourth-highest in 2023 (similar to recent years) behind Vermont, West Virginia, and Wyoming and ahead of New York and Connecticut. Before 2018, Alaska’s premium topped the list.

To read the full Trends article, click here.

Listen to the full Action Line here.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Record heat wave killed half of this Alaska bird population, and they aren’t recovering | CNN

Published

on

Record heat wave killed half of this Alaska bird population, and they aren’t recovering | CNN


Sign up for CNN’s Wonder Theory science newsletter. Explore the universe with news on fascinating discoveries, scientific advancements and more.



CNN
 — 

A marine heat wave has killed approximately half of Alaska’s common murre population, marking the largest recorded die-off of a single species in modern history, research has found. The catastrophic loss points to broader changes in marine environments driven by warming ocean temperatures, which are rapidly and severely restructuring ecosystems and inhibiting the ability of such animals to thrive, according to a new study.

The Northeast Pacific heat wave, known as “the Blob,” spanned the ocean ecosystem from California to the Gulf of Alaska in late 2014 to 2016.

Advertisement

The event is considered the largest and longest known marine heat wave, with temperatures rising by 2.5 to 3 degrees Celsius (4.5 to 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit) above normal levels, said Brie Drummond, coauthor of the study that published December 12 in the journal Science.

Common murres, or Uria aalge, are known for their distinctive black-and-white feathers, resembling the tuxedoed look of penguins. These predators play a critical role in regulating energy flow within the marine food web in the Northern Hemisphere.

While murres have experienced smaller die-offs in the past as a result of environmental and human-induced factors, they typically recover quickly when favorable conditions return. However, the magnitude and speed of the die-off during this heat wave was particularly alarming to Drummond and her team.

The researchers determined the scale of this catastrophic population loss by tracking extreme population declines at 13 colonies across the Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea that have been monitored long-term. By the end of the 2016 heat wave, Drummond and her team counted more than 62,000 common murre carcasses, which only accounted for a fraction of those lost since most dead seabirds never appear on land.

From there, biologists monitored the rate at which common murres were dying and reproducing and found no signs of the colonies returning to their previous size.

Advertisement

“The only reason we had this data and were able to detect this (event) was that we had these long-term data sets and long-term monitoring,” said Drummond, a wildlife biologist at the Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge. “(Monitoring) is the only way we’ll be able to continue to look at what happens in the future.”

A common murre census plot at the Semidi Islands, Alaska, before the 2014–2016 Northeast Pacific marine heat wave had 1,890 birds (left). In 2021, the plot had 1,011 birds.

Before the 2014–2016 Northeast Pacific marine heat wave, a common murre census plot at the Semidi Islands, Alaska, had 1,890 birds (left). In 2021, the plot had 1,011 birds (right).

As temperatures in Alaska rose, the murres’ food supply dwindled, with one of their primary prey, Pacific cod, plunging by about 80% between 2013 and 2017, the study revealed. With the collapse of this key food source, about 4 million common murres died in Alaska within the period from 2014 to 2016, the researchers estimated.

“There are about 8 million people in New York City, so it would be like losing half of the population … in a single winter,” Drummond said.

Before the start of the 2014 heat wave, Alaska’s murre population made up 25% of the world’s population of the seabird species.

Advertisement

However, when comparing the seven-year period before the heat wave (2008 to 2014) with the seven-year span following (2016 to 2022), the study found the murre population in 13 colonies spread between the Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea declined anywhere from 52% to 78%.

Drummond and her colleagues continued monitoring the murres from 2016 to 2022 after the end of the heat wave but found no signs of recovery.

While further research is necessary to fully understand why murres are not bouncing back, Drummond’s team believes the changes are driven by shifts in the marine ecosystem, especially those associated with food supply.

Reproductive challenges and relocation difficulties also may be contributing to the species’ lack of rehabilitation, according to Dr. Falk Huettmann, an associate professor of wildlife ecology at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks, who was not involved in the study.

Unlike some other species, seabirds such as murres take a longer time to reproduce, making repopulation a slower process, Huettmann said.

Advertisement

Additionally, Huettmann noted that murres are bound to the colonies they reside in, and as they are forced to relocate, it can be more difficult to adjust to new conditions.

While temperatures continue to rise in areas such as Alaska, tropical or subtropical waters are moving into different areas, Huettmann said, which creates conditions for an entirely new ecosystem.

With these environmental shifts, animals will either adapt or be unable to survive in the new climate.

Murres are not the only species in Alaskan waters undergoing significant changes. Huettmann noted the tufted puffin, a sensitive marine bird, has been seen migrating north because of poor conditions in southern areas of the North Pacific, including California, Japan and Russia, yet it’s struggling to adapt to its new home. King salmon, whales and crabs are other species grappling with finding their place, he said.

While heat waves have affected many species, other populations aren’t substantially impacted, Drummond said.

Advertisement

Half of the data collected from organisms such as phytoplankton and even homeothermic top predators presented “neutral” responses to the heat wave. Twenty percent of these apex predators even responded positively to the abnormal heat exposure, according to the study.

Homeothermic animals, including birds and mammals, have stable internal body temperatures regardless of the environmental temperature.

“That gives us perspective on which species might more readily adapt to these kinds of warming water events in the future and which will not,” Drummond said.

Although rising temperatures are the primary factor affecting animals like murres, other elements also may be contributing to marine life changes.

“From an ecological perspective … microplastics, ocean acidification, sea levels rising and chronic oil spills … are other massive mortality factors at play,” Huettmann said.

Advertisement

However, studies tracking the long-term effects of climate events on marine life are limited, so scientists are still uncertain about how these animals will continue to be impacted in the future.



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaska Airlines flight returns to San Jose airport due to mechanical issue

Published

on

Alaska Airlines flight returns to San Jose airport due to mechanical issue


FILE PHOTO: An Alaska Airlines Boeing 737 MAX 8 approaches San Diego International Airport for a landing from Palm Springs on December 20, 2024 in San Diego, California. (Photo by Kevin Carter/Getty Images)

 An Alaska Airlines flight had to return to San Jose Mineta International Airport on Wednesday after a mechanical issue.

Advertisement

Alaska Airlines Flight 1130 departed San Jose at 10:01 a.m. bound for Seattle; however, the aircraft turned back, landing at the South Bay airport at 10:50 a.m.

A spokesperson for San Jose Mineta International Airport said they were notified around 10:41 a.m. that the plane was returning after experiencing mechanical issues.

Alaska Airlines said there was a mechanical issue indication in the flight deck of the 737-900 aircraft.

Advertisement

“Pilots followed appropriate procedures and requested priority landing. The aircraft was evaluated by our maintenance team, who were able to repair the issue,” the airline said.

The plane landed safely without issue, according to the airport and airline.

“Our pilots are trained for situations like this and we thank them for their professionalism in handling the situation,” said Alaska.

Advertisement

Alaska Airlines Flight 1130 was rescheduled to depart San Jose at 12:27 p.m. and land in Seattle at 2:45 p.m.

San Jose Mineta International Airport



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaska legislators, citing some citizen complaints, investigate management of 2024 election

Published

on

Alaska legislators, citing some citizen complaints, investigate management of 2024 election


Alaska’s elections chief defended her division’s management of the 2024 elections at a legislative hearing last week, but she acknowledged that logistical challenges created problems for some voters.

Carol Beecher, director of the Division of Elections, reviewed the operations during a more than two-hour hearing of the state House Judiciary Committee. She fielded questions from the committee’s chair, Rep. Sarah Vance, R-Homer, and other Republicans about election security and possible fraud, and she answered questions from Democrats about problems that led to rural precincts being unstaffed or understaffed, which presented obstacles to voters there.

Vance said she did not intend to cast blame, but that she hoped the hearing would lead to more public trust in the election process.

Advertisement

“The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the process of the 2024 election, not the results. It’s not about the outcomes, but about making sure that every legal vote gets counted in a timely manner, and asking what improvements can be made in the process,” she said.

“A lot of the public has reached out to me and expressed a lot of frustration and concern around a lot of the activities of this election,” she said. “So this is an opportunity for us to have a conversation with the director of elections and the public so that we can gain an understanding about what happened and how the actions that we can take in the future.”

Beecher responded to Republican committee members’ queries about safeguards against fraud and the possibility that non-citizens are casting votes.

“We often get asked about U.S. citizenship as regards elections, and we are only required and only allowed to have the person certify and affirm on the forms that they are a citizen, and that is sufficient,” Beecher said. “We do not do investigations into them based on citizenship questions. If there was a question about citizenship that was brought to our attention, we may defer that to the department of law.”

Residents are eligible to vote if they are a citizen of the United States, age 18 years or older and have been registered in the state and their applicable House district for at least 30 days prior to the election. Eligible Alaskans are automatically registered to vote when they obtain their state driver’s licenses or apply for Alaska Permanent Fund dividends.

Advertisement

Beecher said the division investigated and found no evidence of non-U.S. citizens being registered through the PFD system. “This is not happening where somebody is marking that they are not a citizen and are receiving a voter registration card,” she said.

Vance said many Alaskans remain worried, nonetheless, about non-citizens casting votes. “I think people are wanting a stronger position regarding the ability to verify citizenship for the people wanting to vote,” she said. “So can the division take action to verify citizenship on its own, or does it need statutory authority?” Beecher confirmed that the division does not have the authority to verify citizenship.

Tom Flynn, a state attorney, advised caution in response to Vance’s suggestion.

“We should be also wary of the limits that the National Voter Registration Act and its interpretation can place on citizenship checks and the federal voting form requirements,” said Flynn, who is the state’s chief assistant attorney general. The National Registration Act of 1993 prohibits states from confirming citizenship status.

In response to questions about opportunities for fraud through mail-in absentee voting, Beecher said the state relies on the information voters provide. “If an individual applied for an absentee ballot, and all of the information was in our voter registration system that you were eligible to vote, etc, and you had a legitimate address to send it to, then you would be mailed an absentee ballot,” she said.

Advertisement

Each ballot is checked for appropriate voter identification information. Ballots are coded by district, and then given another review by another group of election workers, including an observer, she said. “The observer has the opportunity to challenge that ballot. If they challenge a ballot, a challenge is sent to me, and then I review the information based on what the challenge is, and I’ll often confer with [the Department of] Law,” she said.

Alaska has notably low voter turnout, but also a steadily changing voter roll as it’s one of the most transient populations in the nation, with voters moving in and out of state.

Alaska has a mix of districts with ballot scanners and hand count precincts, usually in rural areas with a small number of voters, as well as voting tablets for those with disabilities. Ballot scanners record ballot information, which is encrypted before being sent to a central server in Juneau. All voting machines are tested ahead of time, Beecher said. For hand count precincts, ballots are tallied up and poll workers call in the results to the division’s regional offices, she said.

“We had about 15 people on phones to take the calls that evening, and the phone starts ringing immediately, and all of the different precincts are calling in,” she said. Division workers also helped poll workers properly read rank choice ballots, she said. “And so there’s a lot of discussion that can happen on that phone call. It’s not necessarily just as simple as going through the list.”

The division of elections has 35 permanent staff who are sworn to remain politically impartial and who work in five district offices to administer the elections in the 60 legislative districts.

Advertisement

Beecher said the division reviews its processes, systems of communications, challenges and improvements needed in each election cycle. “The division has lists and lists and checklists and handbooks, and is very good and diligent about making sure that process and procedures are lined out and checked,” she said.

Rural Alaska problems

Administering elections in rural communities is an ongoing challenge in Alaska. Beecher answered questions on several incidents, including voters in Southwest communities of Dillingham, King Salmon and Aniak receiving the wrong ballots that had to be corrected. In August, a mail bag containing a voted ballot and primary election materials from the village of Old Harbor on Kodiak Island was found on the side of the road, near the Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport.

“We don’t have control over the materials when they are in the custody of the post office, in this case, it was one of their subcontractor carriers,” she said. “We weren’t told [what happened] specifically, but I know that the post office has processes when mail is lost like that, and they do deploy their processes with that contractor.”

Vance said the incident was serious.

Advertisement

“I hope the state is pursuing further accountability, because this is a matter of public trust that something so important was dropped out of the truck along the roadside,” she said. “It looks extremely negligent.”

Beecher said training and retaining poll workers is essential for running elections smoothly. “So one of the challenges that we run into, and frankly, it’s not just in our rural areas, the turnover of poll workers is a reality,” Beecher said. The division conducts in-person poll worker trainings, and provides support with video tutorials and by phone.

This year, in the western Alaska community of Wales, the designated poll worker was not available and so the division of elections located a school teacher late on election day to administer the polls. “It was not ideal,” she said, but they had trained back up poll workers ready to deploy this year.

“We had trained people who were situated at all the various hubs, so Anchorage, Fairbanks, Utgiagvik, Nome, and they were trained and ready to be deployed to some of these polls should we run into a situation where we didn’t have poll workers on the day,” she said. “So we weren’t able to get them to Wales only because of the weather. They were there at the airport ready to head out there. But we did send them to Egegik, and there were polls there.”

Responding to Rep. Cliff Groh, D-Anchorage, Beecher said one thing she would have done better would have been to ensure that the official election pamphlet was more carefully reviewed and checked for errors.

Advertisement

A notable error in the published pamphlet was the misidentification of Republican House candidate Mia Costello as a Democrat.

“Secondly, I would have made sure that our advertisement that had a name in it would not have used names,” she said, referring to a rank choice voting education materials giving examples with fake elector names, including “Odem Harris” which Republicans pointed out filled in a first choice vote for “Harris,” also the Democratic presidential candidate.

“And thirdly, I wish that I had done a better job of anticipating the level of communication that was expected and needed,” Beecher said.

In response to a question about the ballot measure seeking to overturn the ranked-choice system, Beecher said there was no evidence of fraud. The measure failed by just 743 votes.

“We did not see something that would indicate that anything untoward happened with ballots. That simply was not something that was seen in the results,” she said.

Advertisement

Beecher suggested some improvements for legislators to consider this next term. Those included an expansion of mail-only precincts, paid postage for ballots and a requirement that mail-in ballots be sent earlier rather than postmarked by Election Day. “On ballot counting, doing it sooner,” she said. “So potentially changing the time frames of receiving absentee ballots to having everything have to be received by Election Day.” The latter would be a big change for Alaska, which has long counted mail-in ballots as long as they are postmarked by Election Day.

Some changes may be warranted, she said.

“We are not perfect. We know that,” she said. “And we really look to doing better, and [are] wanting it to be better, and that people are confident that it is managed in a way that they have trust in the integrity of the process.”

The next Legislative session starts on Jan. 21. Under the new bipartisan majority, Rep. Andrew Gray, D-Anchorage, is set to chair the committee in the coming session.

Originally published by the Alaska Beacon, an independent, nonpartisan news organization that covers Alaska state government.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending