Connect with us

Alaska

Comparing costs among Alaska towns

Published

on

Comparing costs among Alaska towns


Juneau, Alaska (DOL) – Within Alaska, the cost of living tends to be lowest in the largest cities and smaller communities on the road system. Costs rise as populations fall and barriers to access increase.

Between urban areas, costs differ more by the type of expense than overall. Anchorage and Fairbanks rank closely for overall costs, for example, but Anchorage home prices are higher while Fairbanks pays significantly more for utilities.

In other areas, expenses depend on how remote they are.

Everything costs more in rural Alaska, and shipping plays a primary role in those higher costs. Comprehensive cost-of-living measures are scarce
for much of Alaska — the last statewide survey was completed in 2008.1 This article looks at the two broad cost-of-living indexes available, albeit for a limited list of Alaska communities, then drills down to comparisons around the state for two major spending categories, housing and fuel, for which more sources are available.

Advertisement

Two broad in-state cost-of-living indexes cover only some towns

Anchorage, Fairbanks, Juneau, and Kodiak

The most complete cost-of-living measure for in-state comparisons is the Council for Community and Economic Research survey, which the Alaska-U.S. comparisons that begin on page 9 use extensively. (See that article for more about this survey.)

C2ER tracks prices in four Alaska cities: Anchorage, Fairbanks, Juneau, and Kodiak.

All index values are relative to the survey average for the U.S., set at 100.

Advertisement

In 2022, the overall cost of living in the four Alaska cities ranged from a low of 123 in Fairbanks to a high of 129 in Kodiak. In other words, their costs were 23 percent and 29 percent higher than the average, respectively. (See the table on page 10.)

Alaska cities’ overall scores were similar, but some 1The McDowell Group (now McKinley Research), Alaska Geographic
Differential Study 2008 expenditures differed notably.

Juneau and Anchorage have higher housing costs than Kodiak and Fairbanks. Utility costs also vary depending on winter severity and which energy source a city relies on for heat. Fairbanks’ utility costs are far higher than the other cities and were more than double the survey aver-
age (209) in 2022. Fairbanks winters are extreme, and households primarily use heating oil. Utilities were lower in Juneau and Kodiak, where heating oil is also the dominant heat source, according to the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, but winters are milder. Anchorage was the lowest because of its natural gas. (See the fuel section on page 14.)

Grocery prices were lowest in Anchorage and Fairbanks (the largest cities), higher in Juneau, and highest in Kodiak, the smallest.

Apartment rents and single-family home sales prices in select Alaska areas

Advertisement

Notes: Median adjusted rent includes utility costs. Utility adjustments use 2022 data. Percent change is from the same period the previous
year.

*Bethel is new to the survey in 2023. Bethel’s rent does not include the utility adjustment.

Source: Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce Development, Research, and Analysis Section and Alaska Housing Finance Corporation

Examining housing and fuel costs around the state

Sales prices, rents up in all covered areas

Advertisement

Housing costs make up the largest share of most households’ budgets, and many areas saw large increases over the past year.

Each year, in partnership with the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation, DOL conducts statewide quarterly housing market surveys of lenders and an annual rental survey in early March for several areas. (See the tables above.)

In 2022, the average single-family home cost $422,484. Average prices ranged from a low of $337,329 in Fairbanks to a high of $513,119 in Juneau.

Historically, home prices have been higher than the statewide average in Anchorage and Juneau and lower in the Fairbanks North Star, Matanuska-Susitna, and Kenai Peninsula boroughs. Bethel, the only rural area broken out separately, also tends to be high, but prices can be volatile in small areas because just a few transactions can swing the average.

Consistent with national trends, home prices in Alaska have risen considerably in recent years.

Advertisement

In 2022, Alaska’s average sales price rose 8.7 percent after increasing 8.9 percent in 2021. (For more on the current Alaska housing market, see the May 2023 issue of Trends.)

Higher home prices and rents tend to go hand in hand, but rents rank higher than sales prices in Fairbanks and Kodiak, which have large military populations with generous housing stipends.

The University of Alaska Fairbanks is another steady source of rental demand.

In March, the median adjusted rent for a two-bedroom apartment in the Department of Labor’s survey ranged from a low of $1,055 in Wrangell-Petersburg to a high of $1,532 in Anchorage.

Adjusted rent includes the cost of utilities,2 whether they are included in the rent check or paid separately by the tenant.

Advertisement

Rent was highest in Bethel, which DOL added to the survey in 2023, and because Bethel’s rent doesn’t include the adjustment for utilities, it was probably even further above the other areas than the rent table shows.

Rents were higher than the previous March in all areas.

In the five largest markets, rents rose 9 percent in Fairbanks and Mat-Su, 7 percent in the Kenai Peninsula Borough, 5 percent in Anchorage, and 4 percent in Juneau.

Survey samples vary by year and depend on landlord participation, so these numbers can be more volatile in smaller areas.

Inflation, limited availability, and rising costs have pushed rents upward in recent years.

Advertisement

The September 2023 issue of Trends will detail this year’s rental survey results.

This article uses 2022 utility adjustments for 2023 rents, as they were the most recent available at the time of publication.

“During the pandemic, and even a little bit going into the pandemic, Alaska had for the first time in its history, negative inflation. So, prices actually went down. Then prices went way up during COVID. And they’re just coming down now in the most recent data,” Dan Robinson, Chief Researcher and Analyst for the Alaska Department of Labor’s Economic Trends Magazine said while on Action Line. “In terms of the drivers, it’s an unusually messy set of factors because again of the pandemic. What people bought changed, how much people bought changed, supply chain, work chains were disrupted. So, some of what we can tie to the pandemic is kind of going away, things are normalizing. But there are some things, housing being the main one, that are keeping inflation being a little higher than average.”

He talked more about housing.

“When we talk about overall inflation, housing has the largest weight. Which means, it’s what the average consumer spends the highest percentage of their money on, which makes sense. So, what housing does, whether it’s rising or falling, influences disproportionately what’s going on in the overall inflation rate,” Robinson said. “Juneau is interesting and Alaska overall because despite not a lot of population growth for a while, housing has continued to go up. One thing this article talks about though is that lots of U.S. cities have noticeably more expensive housing than any Alaska city. So, as expensive as things are here, you’d have it a lot worse if you lived in Honolulu, San Fransisco, a long list of other cities.”

Advertisement

Double-digit percent jumps in fuel prices

Fuel prices in the 2023 winter survey had risen significantly from last winter’s survey, which was completed before the oil price spike in late February 2022. Heating oil’s survey average, excluding the North Slope, rose 34 percent over the year, from
$5.03 to $6.72 per gallon. Gasoline went from $5.31 to $6.70. While the winter survey showed fuel prices rose significantly over the year in most places, they had fallen in some communities since the summer survey, especially in places where fuel is delivered throughout the year.

Fuel prices fluctuate constantly, but heating oil and gasoline prices remain stable longer in areas that only receive shipments a few times a year.

In winter 2023, many communities were still paying the higher prices of the previous summer, when they received most of the year’s fuel.

While the Alaska fuel price survey is semiannual, national price data collected more frequently show how volatile prices have been over the past few years, and while prices have fallen from the 2022 highs, they remain elevated from most of the previous few years.

Advertisement

National gasoline prices dropped below $2 a gallon in 2020 when the pandemic began, rebounded and continued to rise through 2021, then spiked to around $5 in late February of 2022 after Russia invaded Ukraine.

The most recent data show prices have come down to less than $4.

Public health insurance premiums

For a typical household, medical care is a small share of out-of-pocket spending — but medical costs can be high for some people and rise with age.

Health care is also a major cost for employers, as those who offer it typically pay the lion’s share of the premiums.

Advertisement

Only a small share of Alaskans are insured through the public health care marketplace, but those premiums provide a state-level measure for medical cost comparisons. In 2023, the average benchmark premium for Alaska was $762 per month.

For comparison, the U.S. average was $456. Alaska ranked fourth-highest in 2023 (similar to recent years) behind Vermont, West Virginia, and Wyoming and ahead of New York and Connecticut. Before 2018, Alaska’s premium topped the list.

To read the full Trends article, click here.

Listen to the full Action Line here.

Advertisement



Source link

Alaska

OPINION: CDQ program and pollock fishery are essential to Western Alaska

Published

on

OPINION: CDQ program and pollock fishery are essential to Western Alaska


By Eric Deakin, Ragnar Alstrom and Michael Link

Updated: 1 hour ago Published: 1 hour ago

We work every day to support Alaska’s rural communities through the Community Development Quota (CDQ) program and have seen firsthand the lifeline the program provides to our state’s most isolated and economically vulnerable areas.

Advertisement

This program is one of the most successful social justice programs in the United States, giving rural, coastal communities a stake in the success of the Bering Sea fisheries, and transferring these benefits into community investments. Our fisheries participation provides $80 million to $100 million of programs, wages and benefits into Western Alaska annually, and the full economic reach of the CDQ program is substantially larger when accounting for jobs and support services statewide.

In some communities, CDQs are the largest and only private-sector employer; the only market for small-boat fishermen; the only nonfederal funding available for critical infrastructure projects; and an essential program provider for local subsistence and commercial fishing access. There is no replacement for the CDQ program, and harm to it would come at a severe cost. As one resident framed it, CDQ is to Western Alaska communities, what oil is to Alaska.

Consistent with their statutory mandate, CDQ groups have increased their fisheries investments, and their 65 member communities are now major players in the Bering Sea. The foundation of the program is the Bering Sea pollock fishery, 30% of which is owned by CDQ groups. We invest in pollock because it remains one of the most sustainably managed fisheries in the world, backed by rigorous science, with independent observers on every vessel, ensuring that bycatch is carefully monitored and minimized.

We also invest in pollock because the industry is committed to constantly improving and responding to new challenges. We understand the impact that salmon collapses are having on culture and food security in Western Alaska communities. Working with industry partners, we have reduced chinook bycatch to historically low levels and achieved more than an 80% reduction in chum bycatch over the past three years. This is a clear demonstration that CDQ groups and industry are taking the dire salmon situation seriously, despite science that shows bycatch reductions will have very minimal, if any, positive impact on subsistence access.

The effects of recent warm summers on the Bering Sea ecosystem have been well documented by science. This has caused some species to prosper, like sablefish and Bristol Bay sockeye salmon, while others have been negatively impacted, including several species of crab and salmon. Adding to these challenges is the unregulated and growing hatchery production of chum salmon in Russia and Asia, which is competing for limited resources in the Bering Sea, and increasing management challenges.

Advertisement

Attributing the current salmon crises to this fishery is misguided and could cause unnecessary harm to CDQ communities. Without the pollock fishery, we would see dramatic increases in the cost of food, fuel and other goods that are shipped to rural Alaska. We would also see the collapse of the CDQ program and all that it provides, including a wide array of projects and jobs that help keep families fed and children in school.

The challenges Alaska faces are significant, and to address them we need to collectively work together to mitigate the impacts of warming oceans on our fisheries, build resiliency in our communities and fishery management, and continue to improve practices to minimize fishing impacts. We must also recognize the vital need for the types of community investments and job opportunities that the CDQ program creates for Western Alaska and ensure these benefits are considered when talking about the Bering Sea pollock fishery.

Eric Deakin is chief executive officer of the Coastal Villages Region Fund.

Ragnar Alstrom is executive director of the Yukon Delta Fisheries Development Association.

Michael Link is president and CEO of Bristol Bay Economic Development Corp.

Advertisement

The views expressed here are the writer’s and are not necessarily endorsed by the Anchorage Daily News, which welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, email commentary(at)adn.com. Send submissions shorter than 200 words to letters@adn.com or click here to submit via any web browser. Read our full guidelines for letters and commentaries here.





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

‘Drag racing for dogs:’ Anchorage canines gather for the ‘Great Alaska Barkout’

Published

on

‘Drag racing for dogs:’ Anchorage canines gather for the ‘Great Alaska Barkout’


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Alaska’s first “flyball” league held its annual “Great Alaska Barkout Flyball Tournament” on Saturday in midtown at Alyeska Canine Trainers.

Flyball is a fast-paced sport in which relay teams of four dogs and their handlers compete to cross the finish line first while carrying a tennis ball launched from a spring loaded box. Saturday’s tournament was one of several throughout the year held by “Dogs Gone Wild,” which started in 2004 as Alaska’s first flyball league.

“We have here in Alaska, we’ve got, I think it’s about 6 tournaments per year,” said competitor and handler Maija Doggett. “So you know every other month or so there will be a tournament hosted. Most of them are hosted right here at Alyeska Canine Trainers.”

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

State of Alaska will defend its right to facilitate oil and gas development

Published

on

State of Alaska will defend its right to facilitate oil and gas development


Last week, Superior Court Judge Andrew Guidi indicated he will rule that Alaska does not have authority to permit access across its lands to facilitate oil and gas development on the North Slope.

The Alaska Dept. of Natural Resources plans to fight and appeal any final adverse ruling that undermines the state’s constitutional interests in resource development.

The Department of Natural Resources has issued a permit allowing Oil Search Alaska (OSA) to cross the Kuparuk River Unit, operated by Conoco Phillips Alaska, to develop the Pikka Unit. As described in the State’s brief to the court, “the denial of such access implicates the delay of development of millions of barrels of oil and billions of dollars of public revenues.”

Advertisement

“The State of Alaska has a constitutional obligation to maximize the development of our resources,” DNR Commissioner John Boyle said on Nov. 22. “We have to confirm with the Supreme Court that we have the authority to permit access for all developers to ensure we can meet this obligation.”

Once the Superior Court issues the final judgement, Alaska will be able to file its appeal. This is expected to occur in the coming weeks.

Click here to support the Alaska Watchman.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending