Connect with us

Alaska

Boreal forests may be the last wild areas in Alaska. How we address their future reveals our priorities as a culture.

Published

on

Boreal forests may be the last wild areas in Alaska. How we address their future reveals our priorities as a culture.


Boreal forest covers a lot of central Alaska. Taiga, as this forest is known as, consists of dense black spruce forests and a mosaic of different forest bushes. Aspen and birch thrive on south-facing hillsides. The bigger rivers help important stands of white spruce. Ponds, swamps and bogs are interspersed with meadows and small lakes. These seemingly countless stretches of small bushes are tough to navigate on foot, thus journey in these boreal forest is minimal.

A lot of the taiga in Alaska is left unmolested, not less than in the summertime months. Solitary trappers poke trails into some distant sections looking for marten throughout the winter months, however with the dismal demand for furs, trappers are a disappearing breed.

Just a few years again, I flew over a piece of the Canadian taiga north and east of Whitehorse. 100 miles out from anyplace, a slender lower within the black spruce appeared. The path was an immediate magnet. Thirty minutes of Tremendous Cub time introduced me to the tip of that path at a big lake. There was no cabin. Intrigued, I adopted the path again; this time there was a tiny cabin on the sting of a creek. The identify of the trapper was by no means found, however this man was approach, approach on the market.

Advertisement

The North American taiga covers greater than 2.3 million sq. miles, an space bigger than the Brazilian Amazon rain forest. This large space is basically ignored in Alaska, however it’s a totally different story in Canada. A lot of the Canadian taiga space is being logged. Noticed logs are discovered by the river techniques, however many of the reducing is completed for pulpwood. Rest room paper, catalogs and the commercial flyers we throw away account for many of the pulp. People are the most important shoppers of those merchandise.

Sure, all of us use these merchandise, however there’s a value. About 60% of the North American chook inhabitants discovered north of the Mexican border nests within the boreal forest. Greater than 300 chook species breed there. Most of those birds make their houses close to water sources: lakes, small creeks and beaver ponds. Boreal chickadees, grey jays, nice grey owls and black-backed woodpeckers are among the many few who make their houses deep within the black spruce.

In June 1975, I took a two-week stroll into the higher reaches of the Ungalik River, simply north of Shaktoolik. The silence of that forest was surreal. Chickadees and jays gave the impression to be the one life. Monotonous hills adopted each other endlessly. The Native folks within the coastal villages thought the realm was haunted. One may see why.

Individuals take a look at these large tracts of seemingly unusable panorama and rapidly flip to extra numerous and fascinating locales. But, there may be an attraction to the “silence that bludgeons you dumb.” This wilderness. Go searching you; there are few wild lands remaining. There may be an oil properly right here and a gold mine there. The state of Alaska appears to be leaning closely towards improvement across the state, the proposed Ambler street undertaking being one instance.

The argument for improvement is legitimate. There are huge tracts of land in our state which might be unused. Growth of sources offers jobs. A street, a mine … what do they harm? There isn’t a bodily hurt. These against this kind of improvement purpose that this will hurt the caribou herd, or that the state mustn’t spend thousands and thousands of {dollars} on what is basically a non-public street.

Advertisement

These arguments are legitimate additionally. The hurt outlined and the advantages touted is probably not the problem right here. The query we have to reply, as public stewards of our lands, is that this: How vital is true wilderness? How does one outline wilderness? Is it an space that’s little-used, or used not as all?

Boreal forests are the final true wild areas in Alaska. Ought to we actively attempt to avoid wasting them from future improvement? Or — will we assume that there will probably be little impression, underneath any circumstance, due to their remoteness? Are the merchandise and worth derived from utilization extra vital to our society than the antipathy at discovering a plastic bag fluttering from the department of a black spruce 100 miles north of nowhere?





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Fatal vehicle collision left one dead, two injured at mile 91 of Seward Highway, APD says

Published

on

Fatal vehicle collision left one dead, two injured at mile 91 of Seward Highway, APD says


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – On Thursday, a vehicle collision at mile 91 of the Seward Highway left one dead and two injured, according to an update from APD.

The collision involved two vehicles — a semi-truck and a passenger vehicle.

The Girdwood Fire Department responded at about 8:41 p.m. and pronounced the male driver of the vehicle dead at the scene.

APD says a male and female were transported to the hospital with non-life-threatening injuries.

Advertisement

At the time of publication, the southbound and northbound lanes of the Seward Highway remain closed.

APD is currently investigating the circumstances of the collision and the victim’s identity will be released once they have completed next-of-kin procedures.

Original Story: An incident involving two vehicles at mile 91 of Seward Highway leaves two injured, according to Anchorage Police Department (APD).

APD is responding to the scene and travelers should expect closures at mile 91 for both northbound and southbound lanes of the Seward Highway for at least the next 3 to 4 hours.

Updates will be made as they become available.

Advertisement

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Strong winds destroy deer shelter at Alaska Wildlife Conservation Center

Published

on

Strong winds destroy deer shelter at Alaska Wildlife Conservation Center


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Strong winds in the Portage area on Monday destroyed a shelter building at the Alaska Wildlife Conservation Center that was used to house Sitka deer. The conservation center says 80 mph winds swept through Portage Valley.

The conservation center says no animals were injured, but they are quickly raising money to rebuild. Their goal is $30,000, and as of Thursday morning, they have already fundraised over $26,000.

Sales & Marketing Director Nicole Geils said, “The shelter was in their habitat. It was essential for providing them a safe Haven during harsh weather. It’s a really useful area for when we’re feeding and doing enrichment with the deer and it’s also a safe space for recovery after medical procedures when needed.”

Executive Director Sarah Howard described how she learned about the damage.

Advertisement

“We had a staff member that radioed, ‘The shelter’s gone!’ And a couple of us were at least able to make a little light of the situation. Like, did it go to Oz? And thankfully, it didn’t go too far, and the deer were okay,” Howard said.

The conservation center is still accepting donations through their website.

Strong winds destroy deer shelter at Alaska Wildlife Conservation Center(Courtesy Nicole Geils)
Strong winds destroy deer shelter at Alaska Wildlife Conservation Center
Strong winds destroy deer shelter at Alaska Wildlife Conservation Center(Courtesy Nicole Geils)

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

After school funding dispute, 4 Alaska districts move on without federally promised money

Published

on

After school funding dispute, 4 Alaska districts move on without federally promised money


Until last month, the U.S. Department of Education said Alaska underfunded four of its largest school districts by $17.5 million. As a result of a recent agreement, the schools in Anchorage, Fairbanks, Juneau and Kenai Peninsula Borough won’t directly receive any of that money.

However, two of the districts said they weren’t counting on receiving the money as they planned their current budgets, while the other districts either didn’t respond or declined to comment.

The $17.5 million is part of COVID-era pandemic funding, and until last month, how Alaska distributed that funding was at the heart of a years-long dispute between federal and state officials, and whether it was spent fairly.

The state repeatedly defended their school spending plan, while the federal government asserted the state failed to comply with guidelines and reduced spending on these districts with high-need or high-poverty areas, and withheld the sum they said was owed.

Advertisement

Federal officials said the state reduced spending to the Kenai Peninsula and Anchorage school districts by up to $11.89 million in the 2021 to 2022 school year, and all four districts by $5.56 million the following year.

Kenai Superintendent Clayton Holland said the district never budgeted for this particular federal COVID funding, as they were aware of the dispute.

“Had it gone through, we would have welcomed it, as we are facing a potential deficit of $17 million for next year” and have nearly exhausted the balance of funding the district can spend without restrictions, Holland said.

Anchorage School District officials did not respond to requests for comment.

The dispute came to an end on Dec. 20,  when the federal department told the state it was releasing the funding, citing a review of the state’s one-time funding boosts in the last two budgets, and considered the matter closed.

Advertisement

Alaska Education Commissioner Deena Bishop led the state’s defense effort, including appealing the penalty, and applauded the move by the federal Department of Education. She said the state always followed the state law governing school funding.

“The department said, ‘We don’t agree with your formula, you should have given these guys more.’ And we said, ‘No, no, no. Only our Legislature can make the law about our formula. That’s why we stood behind it,” she said in an interview Tuesday.

The dispute centered around what was known as a “maintenance of equity” provision of a federal COVID aid law, which banned states from dropping per-pupil spending during the pandemic. Bishop said that decreases in funding in the four districts were due to drops in enrollment, according to the state’s spending formula.

Bishop defended the formula as equitable, noting that it factors in geographic area, local tax bases, and other issues. “I just felt strongly that there’s no way that they can say that we’re inequitable, because there are third-party assessments and research that has been done that Alaska actually has one of the most equitable formulas,” she said.

“Our funding formula is a state entity. Our districts are funded according to that,” Bishop said. “And so basically, they [U.S. Department of Education] argued that the distribution of funds from the state funding formula, the state’s own money, right, nothing to do with the Feds, was inequitable.

Advertisement

“So they picked these districts to say, ‘You need to give them more.’ And we’re saying, ‘No, you don’t have a right to say that. We spent your money, how you said, but only the state Legislature can say’” how to spend state money, she said.

She said the state felt confident about their spending plan for American Rescue Plan Act funding.

In addition to temporarily withholding the funding, the federal government further penalized Alaska by designating it a “high risk” grantee.

Federal and state officials went back and forth on compliance, with the state doubling down, defending their school spending. By May, the state had racked up another $1 million in frozen federal funds.

Bishop said despite the holds from the feds, they continued to award the funds to districts.

Advertisement

“We felt as though we would prevail. So we never wanted to harm school districts who were appropriated those funds the way that they were supposed to,” she said. School districts followed the dispute closely.

Juneau School District’ Superintendent Frank Hauser said the district did not expect or budget for the funds.

“JSD was slated only to receive approximately $90,000 of the “maintenance of equity” funds, much less than Kenai, Fairbanks, or Anchorage,” he said in an email. “JSD will not receive that money now; however, we had not anticipated receiving it and had not included it in our budget projection.”

The Fairbanks North Star Borough School District declined to comment on the issue. A spokesperson said the district administration is awaiting clarification from the state education department.

On Monday, the administration announced a recommended consolidation plan for five elementary schools to be closed, citing a $16 million deficit for next year. A final vote on whether to close the schools is set for early February.

Advertisement

Now the state is in the process of applying for reimbursements from the federal Department of Education, and expects to receive that full $17.5 million award, Bishop said. If districts have outstanding pandemic-related expenses, she said those can be submitted to the state, and will be reimbursed according to the state’s COVID-19 funding guidelines. “We’ll process that, and then we’ll go to the Feds and get that money back,” she said.

In December, Gov. Mike Dunleavy applauded the federal announcement, calling the dispute “a tremendous waste of time,” in a prepared statement. He repeated his support for President-elect Donald Trump’s calls to eliminate the U.S. Department of Education.

“On the bright side, this saga is a wonderful case study of the U.S. Department of Education’s abuse of power and serves as further evidence for why I support the concept of eliminating it,” he said.

Dunleavy linked to a social media post he made on X, which read, in part, that eliminating the department “would restore local control of education back to the states, reduce bureaucratic inefficiency and reduce cost. Long overdue.”

Sen. Löki Tobin, D-Anchorage and chair of the Senate Education Committee, pointed to the timing for the outgoing Biden administration and federal leaders’ desire to release funding to Alaska schools.

Advertisement

“It’s very clear that if the presidential election had ended in a different result, we would not be having this conversation,” she said. “Instead, they would be continuing to work with the department to find a more elegant, a more clean solution.”

She said the federal letter announcing the end to the long dispute doesn’t mean the issue of equity was resolved.

“I think their letter to the Department of Education and Early Development here in Alaska was very clear that Alaska never did fully comply with the guidelines, but instead, due to a want and a fervent hope that the resources would get into the schools and into the communities that so desperately needed them, that they would choose to not pursue further compliance measures,” she said.

Last year, the Legislature passed a budget with $11.89 million included for the state to comply with the federal requirements, but that funding was vetoed by Dunleavy, who defended the state’s position, saying the “need for funds is indeterminate.”

The budget did include a one-time funding boost to all districts, but Tobin said the annual school aid debate left districts in limbo for future budget planning.

Advertisement

“We can see how this has cost school districts, how it has created instability, how it has resulted in a system that is unpredictable for funding streams for our schools,” Tobin said.

Kenai Superintendent Holland expressed hope that school funding would be prioritized by elected officials this year.

“The bigger issue for us, and for all Alaskan school districts, is what our legislators and governor will decide regarding education funding in the upcoming legislative session,” Holland said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending