Connect with us

Alaska

Anchorage Assembly rejects renaming Port of Alaska after late U.S. Rep. Don Young

Published

on

Anchorage Assembly rejects renaming Port of Alaska after late U.S. Rep. Don Young


The Anchorage Assembly on Tuesday rejected a recommendation from a citizen naming panel to rename the Port of Alaska as the Don Young Port of Anchorage, after the late U.S. representative.

Young was a sometimes-polarizing political figure, and divisions over his legacy came to the fore of the Assembly’s debate. After a lengthy back-and-forth, members indefinitely postponed the measure in an 8-4 vote Tuesday. They also rejected a proposed version that would have renamed the port’s cargo docks after Young, and another that would have renamed the port as the Don Young Port of Alaska instead.

But then on Wednesday, member Felix Rivera called for the Assembly to reconsider renaming the port, with support from Chair Christopher Constant. Members will again take up the decision at the next meeting on Jan. 9, Rivera said.

Advertisement

Aside from the name recommended by the citizen panel, Assembly members had two viable alternatives to choose Tuesday, Rivera said, referring to the cargo dock proposal and the expanded Port of Alaska moniker.

“I think both of those options were well thought out and deserving of consideration,” Rivera said Wednesday. “And I feel like we just got a little bit wrapped around the axle, and I myself would like to see this issue resolved sooner rather than later.”

The cargo dock version was proposed as a compromise by Vice Chair Meg Zaletel, who said that ports in the U.S. are traditionally named after their body of water or their point of terminus, such as a city or county.

But Zaletel later moved to postpone it indefinitely. The city has a new public naming commission, and Tuesday’s vote now allows the administration or the Assembly to send the matter to that body, she said.

If it does go to the commission, it’s unclear how long that process could take. Assembly legislation in September created the public naming commission of nine voting members, but its seats are not yet filled. That would likely take quite some time, Rivera said.

Advertisement

“If we can’t support one of those two options, then I want us to be realistic and be blunt about, ‘Are we going to name anything after Don Young or not?’ Because I know that there’s a part of our community that is waiting for that,” he said.

Mayor Dave Bronson initially proposed renaming the port in remembrance of Young after the longtime Alaska congressman died last year during a flight to Seattle, on his way home.

Bronson and former Assembly Chair Suzanne LaFrance then each appointed two members to a naming panel. In June, the panel recommended renaming the port as the Don Young Port of Anchorage. When the Assembly took up the matter in September, they postponed their vote and directed the panel to again hold a public hearing and vote on their recommendation, because it had failed to give proper public notice to gather input.

The panel reconvened and returned with the same name recommendation.

“Congressman Young tirelessly served Alaska for 49 years. He was the only licensed mariner in the U.S. Congress,” said Jim Jansen, a member of the panel. “With the Anchorage International Airport named after Sen. Ted Stevens, it is appropriate Alaska’s largest port is named after Congressman Don Young.”

Advertisement

Bronson was not present during Tuesday’s meeting, but his chief of staff, Mario Bird, advocated for the panel’s recommendation.

All of Alaska’s congressional delegation — Republican Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan and Democratic Rep. Mary Peltola — signed a letter that called on the Assembly to rename the port after Young, Bird said.

“We should not simply disregard the support and the time that they have lended to this, especially because they are now fulfilling many of the same roles that Don Young fulfilled for many years,” Bird said. “Love him or hate him, Don Young achieved an order of magnitude as a statesman in Alaska that should be recognized.”

Young, who died at age 88, was the longest-serving member of the Congress at the time. When Bronson called for the name change in March, he said that Young, the former chair of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, “was instrumental in bringing federal dollars to the Port of Alaska.”

Assembly members on Tuesday night acknowledged Young’s work for the port and his impact on Alaska, while simultaneously opposing or questioning the renaming, and criticizing the late congressman.

Advertisement

“Don Young had his day for Alaska, but he aged into someone who was insensitive, a bully and disrespected women. Rewarding a public figure for this bad behavior because he brought the state money is not in the best interest of our city,” member Karen Bronga said, adding that she liked the idea to rename the cargo docks instead.

Assembly member Kevin Cross urged other members to honor the recommendation of the naming panel and approve the measure.

“Why are we putting these commissions together? And why are we doing panels who go through months of work, a stack of documents and massive conversations with attorneys to come up with a name they all unanimously approved? So at the last minute, we go, ‘I got a better idea.’ That just seemed like a huge, colossal waste of all these people’s time,” Cross said.

However, Cross later indicated he is amenable to sending the matter to the new commission.

[Anchorage Assembly member Kevin Cross announces resignation]

Advertisement

Some Assembly members on Tuesday said they were frustrated, and felt pressured and left with little choice in the matter, referencing the Alaska delegation’s letter and the specificity of Bronson’s proposal to rename the port. Still, they voted it down.

“It doesn’t look like at any point other names were even really considered,” member Zac Johnson said. “As far as I can tell, this decision was made long before any of us were on the body. And now we’ve just been expected to endorse it.”

Member Kameron Perez-Verdia said that normally, naming panels are responsible for renaming less significant infrastructure, like parks or buildings, while the port is critical statewide.

“The decision to name that should not be with the hands of four citizens,” he said, adding that they’d done their job well but that there should be a “robust public process to determine whether this is what Alaskans want.”

Member George Martinez expressed that he felt conflicted over the decision and the duality of Young’s actions.

Advertisement

The panel’s unanimous recommendation included a vote from Aaron Leggett, president of Native Village of Eklutna, Martinez said, and the late congressman had a history of personal advocacy for Alaskans. But Young had also used racial slurs in the past, Martinez said.

“If you find folks out in the community who met and know Don Young, he’s helped them. And he helped those folks. So there’s that relationship. And then there’s also when Don Young in 2013 called Latinos ‘wetbacks.’ And it’s a parallel with what member Bronga described,” Martinez said. “There has been a history of championing against people who look like me, who have who come from backgrounds where I come from. So I was struggling with the totality of it in the first place.”

Members also argued over whether the city should return the port, in part, to its original namesake as the Port of Anchorage.

In 2017, the Assembly changed the port’s name from the Port of Anchorage to the Port of Alaska, in part to send a message to state leaders that the port is a statewide asset.

[Editor’s note: This story has been updated to reflect that the Anchorage Assembly will reconsider renaming the port at its next meeting in January.]

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Fort Wainwright opens Aquatic Center for servicemembers & families

Published

on

Fort Wainwright opens Aquatic Center for servicemembers & families


FAIRBANKS, Alaska (KTUU) – Fort Wainwright opened a new $40 million aquatic center Thursday, which leaders say is intended to improve base quality of life.

The Aquatic Center opened in an official ceremony on December 26.(Alex Bengel/Alaska’s News Source)

“They can come in and do their physical fitness in the mornings, and they can come here and enjoy our beautiful pool with their families and friends during their recreation time. So it’s just like it’s just it gives them something to do in the long dark days during the winter here, and I believe it’s going to be greatly appreciated by the soldiers and our family here,” Ft. Wainwright Business & Recreation Chief Larry Watson said.

Families, soldiers, and political officials gathered at the new center on base to hear remarks from U.S. Army Garrison Alaska Fort Wainwright Garrison Commander Col. Jason Cole.

According to Cole, planning for the nearly 30,000-square-foot facility began in 2019.

Advertisement

Now open, the aquatic center offers lap swimming, a party room, and lessons, among other amenities.

Services at the aquatics center are free for active-duty military and children up to three years old.

Currently, lap swimming will be available from 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. Monday through Friday. Weekdays will also see open recreation swim from 3 p.m. to 6 p.m.

Weekend hours will be noon to 8 p.m. on Saturdays and 1 p.m. to 6 p.m. on Sundays.

Access to the base is required for entry. More information about the center can be found here.

Advertisement

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Record heat wave killed half of this Alaska bird population, and they aren’t recovering | CNN

Published

on

Record heat wave killed half of this Alaska bird population, and they aren’t recovering | CNN


Sign up for CNN’s Wonder Theory science newsletter. Explore the universe with news on fascinating discoveries, scientific advancements and more.



CNN
 — 

A marine heat wave has killed approximately half of Alaska’s common murre population, marking the largest recorded die-off of a single species in modern history, research has found. The catastrophic loss points to broader changes in marine environments driven by warming ocean temperatures, which are rapidly and severely restructuring ecosystems and inhibiting the ability of such animals to thrive, according to a new study.

The Northeast Pacific heat wave, known as “the Blob,” spanned the ocean ecosystem from California to the Gulf of Alaska in late 2014 to 2016.

Advertisement

The event is considered the largest and longest known marine heat wave, with temperatures rising by 2.5 to 3 degrees Celsius (4.5 to 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit) above normal levels, said Brie Drummond, coauthor of the study that published December 12 in the journal Science.

Common murres, or Uria aalge, are known for their distinctive black-and-white feathers, resembling the tuxedoed look of penguins. These predators play a critical role in regulating energy flow within the marine food web in the Northern Hemisphere.

While murres have experienced smaller die-offs in the past as a result of environmental and human-induced factors, they typically recover quickly when favorable conditions return. However, the magnitude and speed of the die-off during this heat wave was particularly alarming to Drummond and her team.

The researchers determined the scale of this catastrophic population loss by tracking extreme population declines at 13 colonies across the Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea that have been monitored long-term. By the end of the 2016 heat wave, Drummond and her team counted more than 62,000 common murre carcasses, which only accounted for a fraction of those lost since most dead seabirds never appear on land.

From there, biologists monitored the rate at which common murres were dying and reproducing and found no signs of the colonies returning to their previous size.

Advertisement

“The only reason we had this data and were able to detect this (event) was that we had these long-term data sets and long-term monitoring,” said Drummond, a wildlife biologist at the Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge. “(Monitoring) is the only way we’ll be able to continue to look at what happens in the future.”

A common murre census plot at the Semidi Islands, Alaska, before the 2014–2016 Northeast Pacific marine heat wave had 1,890 birds (left). In 2021, the plot had 1,011 birds.

Before the 2014–2016 Northeast Pacific marine heat wave, a common murre census plot at the Semidi Islands, Alaska, had 1,890 birds (left). In 2021, the plot had 1,011 birds (right).

As temperatures in Alaska rose, the murres’ food supply dwindled, with one of their primary prey, Pacific cod, plunging by about 80% between 2013 and 2017, the study revealed. With the collapse of this key food source, about 4 million common murres died in Alaska within the period from 2014 to 2016, the researchers estimated.

“There are about 8 million people in New York City, so it would be like losing half of the population … in a single winter,” Drummond said.

Before the start of the 2014 heat wave, Alaska’s murre population made up 25% of the world’s population of the seabird species.

Advertisement

However, when comparing the seven-year period before the heat wave (2008 to 2014) with the seven-year span following (2016 to 2022), the study found the murre population in 13 colonies spread between the Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea declined anywhere from 52% to 78%.

Drummond and her colleagues continued monitoring the murres from 2016 to 2022 after the end of the heat wave but found no signs of recovery.

While further research is necessary to fully understand why murres are not bouncing back, Drummond’s team believes the changes are driven by shifts in the marine ecosystem, especially those associated with food supply.

Reproductive challenges and relocation difficulties also may be contributing to the species’ lack of rehabilitation, according to Dr. Falk Huettmann, an associate professor of wildlife ecology at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks, who was not involved in the study.

Unlike some other species, seabirds such as murres take a longer time to reproduce, making repopulation a slower process, Huettmann said.

Advertisement

Additionally, Huettmann noted that murres are bound to the colonies they reside in, and as they are forced to relocate, it can be more difficult to adjust to new conditions.

While temperatures continue to rise in areas such as Alaska, tropical or subtropical waters are moving into different areas, Huettmann said, which creates conditions for an entirely new ecosystem.

With these environmental shifts, animals will either adapt or be unable to survive in the new climate.

Murres are not the only species in Alaskan waters undergoing significant changes. Huettmann noted the tufted puffin, a sensitive marine bird, has been seen migrating north because of poor conditions in southern areas of the North Pacific, including California, Japan and Russia, yet it’s struggling to adapt to its new home. King salmon, whales and crabs are other species grappling with finding their place, he said.

While heat waves have affected many species, other populations aren’t substantially impacted, Drummond said.

Advertisement

Half of the data collected from organisms such as phytoplankton and even homeothermic top predators presented “neutral” responses to the heat wave. Twenty percent of these apex predators even responded positively to the abnormal heat exposure, according to the study.

Homeothermic animals, including birds and mammals, have stable internal body temperatures regardless of the environmental temperature.

“That gives us perspective on which species might more readily adapt to these kinds of warming water events in the future and which will not,” Drummond said.

Although rising temperatures are the primary factor affecting animals like murres, other elements also may be contributing to marine life changes.

“From an ecological perspective … microplastics, ocean acidification, sea levels rising and chronic oil spills … are other massive mortality factors at play,” Huettmann said.

Advertisement

However, studies tracking the long-term effects of climate events on marine life are limited, so scientists are still uncertain about how these animals will continue to be impacted in the future.



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaska Airlines flight returns to San Jose airport due to mechanical issue

Published

on

Alaska Airlines flight returns to San Jose airport due to mechanical issue


FILE PHOTO: An Alaska Airlines Boeing 737 MAX 8 approaches San Diego International Airport for a landing from Palm Springs on December 20, 2024 in San Diego, California. (Photo by Kevin Carter/Getty Images)

 An Alaska Airlines flight had to return to San Jose Mineta International Airport on Wednesday after a mechanical issue.

Advertisement

Alaska Airlines Flight 1130 departed San Jose at 10:01 a.m. bound for Seattle; however, the aircraft turned back, landing at the South Bay airport at 10:50 a.m.

A spokesperson for San Jose Mineta International Airport said they were notified around 10:41 a.m. that the plane was returning after experiencing mechanical issues.

Alaska Airlines said there was a mechanical issue indication in the flight deck of the 737-900 aircraft.

Advertisement

“Pilots followed appropriate procedures and requested priority landing. The aircraft was evaluated by our maintenance team, who were able to repair the issue,” the airline said.

The plane landed safely without issue, according to the airport and airline.

“Our pilots are trained for situations like this and we thank them for their professionalism in handling the situation,” said Alaska.

Advertisement

Alaska Airlines Flight 1130 was rescheduled to depart San Jose at 12:27 p.m. and land in Seattle at 2:45 p.m.

San Jose Mineta International Airport



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending