Connect with us

Alaska

Alaska's rural schools need major infrastructure investment. KYUK has been investigating

Published

on

Alaska's rural schools need major infrastructure investment. KYUK has been investigating


For the last several months, KYUK’s Emily Schwing has been investigating why Alaska’s rural public schools are falling apart. This week we’ll hear some of the work she’s done in partnership with ProPublica and National Public Radio (NPR).

Schwing sat down with KYUK’s Sage Smiley to talk more about the project and what she has found.

Read a transcript of the conversation below.

KYUK (Sage Smiley): Thanks so much for joining me today on [“Coffee at KYUK”], Emily. First of all, can you tell us what made you take on this project?

Advertisement

Emily Schwing: So honestly, I got a phone call and a couple text messages from someone in Sleetmute. He was very persistent, and finally I picked up the phone and he explained what was going on with the building in Sleetmute and all of the structural damage that the school district was trying to mitigate.

KYUK: For those who haven’t interacted with KYUK’s previous reporting, with your previous reporting on Sleetmute school, what’s happening there?

Schwing: What is happening in the Sleetmute school is that the roof there has been leaking for almost two decades, and maybe even longer than that. It’s caused a ton of other damage in the building. The water has run down into some of the walls; there’s water damage in the ceiling. The wetness that has been left unchecked has caused a lot of black mold to develop in the building. And then the other thing that’s happening is at the structural studs in the walls, particularly in the school’s wood shop, which is at the back of the building. As that keeps rotting, the building’s becoming structurally unsound, to a point where architectural inspections and engineering reports say that the building, the back end of the building, at least, is just not safe for use.

KYUK: So it sounds like a really dire situation for Sleetmute school, but this project isn’t only focusing on Sleetmute. How did what you found in Sleetmute kind of carry you through to a bigger investigation in the state?

Schwing: I do a lot of my reporting from small communities in western Alaska and elsewhere, and I started noticing in the past few years, as I was staying in schools, that there were problems with infrastructure. There were problems with drinking water, and sewer lines, and how useful the bathrooms could be. I was in a school in Kivalina a few years ago, and the windows were wind blown to the point you couldn’t see out of them. I was smelling things in certain schools. I was in a school in Mertarvik last year where you could smell raw sewage, and then we actually found raw sewage. And I’ve been in schools where the power is unreliable. Up in Venetie, the phone doesn’t work in one part of the building. So I was just kind of noticing all of these problems with this public infrastructure, and then I started to really put those pieces together after I visited the Sleetmute school.

Advertisement

KYUK: So in this project, looking at school infrastructure, focusing on Western Alaska and other parts of the state, what did you find?

Schwing: Oh, I found all kinds of things, Sage. [laughter] I’m not laughing because it’s funny, I’m laughing because it’s overwhelming. In Venetie, I spent a lot of time – that school, it has a really strange layout. So there are three different attic spaces [and] I found uncovered electrical wiring. I found deteriorating insulation around pipes. I found a very persistent propylene glycol leak from the heating system. Let’s see, what else? You know, in Sleetmute, I had a little boy tell me that sometimes the ceiling tiles fall out of the ceiling while he’s sitting in his kindergarten classroom.

KYUK: So it sounds like there are a lot of pretty stark issues with schools throughout the state of Alaska. How did it get this bad?

Schwing: I’ll be really honest with you, Sage, I think it’s been this bad always, and the reason I say that is because when we gained statehood in 1959, lawmakers really wanted to establish a statewide public school system, and they really grappled with how to pay for it. They knew it was going to be expensive, but they also knew that there were a lot of places that either didn’t have schools, and if they did have schools they were schools that were operated by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), and those schools were known to have a lot of issues, a lot of the same issues that I’m telling you about today. So there was a push to unify our school system, because lawmakers didn’t want to have two separate tracks that could diverge, but taking over BIA schools was going to be really expensive and lawmakers were really grappling with this into the 1970s. One thing that really stood out to me was a transcript that I found from a 1971 Congressional hearing where then [United States] Sen. Mike Gravel, a Democrat, he described the conditions inside BIA schools and he said that many Alaska children, “go to school in buildings that should be condemned as fire traps or unsafe dwellings.” When I was reading this transcript, I really felt like he was describing some of the schools that I have been inside of today.

KYUK: So where did it go from there, then? That’s the 1980s, there’s been a pretty large stretch of time in between then and now. What happened after the the 1971 Congressional hearing you just spoke about and then the state taking over those BIA schools in the 80s?

Advertisement

Schwing: The BIA finally relinquished its schools to the state by the end of the 1980s, I think 1989 was the last year that those schools were transferred. And then after that, there was also a lawsuit about the same time called – well, it’s known as Tobeluk v. Lind, but it’s also known as the Molly Hootch case, and that case centered around accessibility. Molly Hootch is from Emmonak, and she was part of this case where a bunch of students got together and sued because they had to do high school by correspondence, so they were getting their assignments by mail and then mailing them back. So the argument there was that we are supposed to have access for all children to public school, mandated in our state constitution, and correspondence didn’t allow for that access. The next case after that really – so the Molly Hootch case was decided in favor of Molly Hootch, and then 126 public schools were built throughout rural Alaska and villages after that. In the 1990s there was another case, it’s known as the Kasayulie case, and this case was really precedent-setting for public school infrastructure and how the state funds it. So parents of students got together and filed this suit against the state, arguing that the way public schools were funded was unfair to rural communities because rural communities don’t have a tax base, so they don’t have a local government that can levy taxes and then pull from that tax revenue to cover the cost of public school infrastructure. That case was settled with a consent decree in 2011 and the judge did, in fact, say, ‘Yes, the state needs to rework the way it funds public school infrastructure.’ And there [are] two orders in that case, and in those orders the judge also described a lot of the conditions that I’m telling you about today.

KYUK: And then that was, what now, 14,15 years ago, but you’re still seeing a lot of the same things. So whose responsibility is this now?

Schwing: This is really the crux of all of this reporting, for me, is finding the accountability piece of this. So I’ve gone through state documents from the [Alaska] Department of Education, all of the requests from urban and rural school districts for funding dating back to 1998. At the same time, I’ve also gone through all of the ownership documents that I can find for public school buildings in rural communities, and what I’m finding is that there are 128 rural public schools that are open and operating today in Alaska, and the state owns just under half of those schools. In the [Alaska] Department of Education’s own regulations, it says that school districts have to get use permits for the buildings that they don’t own and essentially be a good tenant, right? Just as a renter and a landlord would make an agreement, the tenant, the school district in this case, has to take care of the building and its everyday functions, but the state is still fully responsible for construction and maintenance of the buildings. Those regulations are legally binding. They’re as strong as state law. So state law basically says that in the case of the buildings that are owned by the state, the state is responsible for funding investment in construction and maintenance.

KYUK: But that hasn’t been happening?

Schwing: No. The simple answer is no. The more complicated answer is, why not? We don’t really know, other than there is this constant, seemingly annual battle in the [Alaska] Legislature every year over how to fund education. I did talk to [Alaska Department of] Education Commissioner Deena Bishop about this very thing, and she says it’s not as simple as the state just has to pay for it. She’s waiting for money that comes from the [Alaska] Legislature’s decision on how to fund the state budget. And then it just starts to get more and more complicated from there, because the governor’s office wants one thing, and certain lawmakers want another, and then other lawmakers want this, and the [Alaska] Department of Education needs that, and we’re talking about just one agency among many agencies that are asking lawmakers for money every year.

Advertisement

KYUK: In this back and forth in the state legislature, between the governor’s office, between all these state agencies, what’s the impact on the schools themselves?

Schwing: The impact on the schools themselves is that school suffers. The actual education suffers. And I think that the experience of students, teachers, and staff who use these buildings every day also suffer. The money that would otherwise go to pay for things like textbooks, curriculum, whiteboards or smart boards, or actual tools for learning and teaching eventually goes to pay for things like the lumber that is temporarily holding up the back end of Sleetmute’s woodshop right now, and so school administrators are then tasked with figuring out what to cut. And at this point, they’re starting to decide whether they should cut a teacher’s aide or a whole class, a whole art class or a whole second language class. And that’s really where the suffering starts to happen, I think. And the other thing is, you know, like in the case of Sleetmute, there’s 25 people who use that school every day that are all sharing a single bathroom because the boys’ bathroom is also now closed. The gymnasium is in the section of the building that is structurally unsound. So on days when it’s 30 below zero [Fahrenheit] in Sleetmute, in the wintertime, which is typical for that part of Alaska, kids are stuck inside for recess, where they can play quiet games inside, but they can’t get their wiggles out on the playground. And so I think those are the parts of the impact of what’s really happening in Alaska schools that are often forgotten.

KYUK: What surprised you in the process of reporting this story?

Schwing: What surprised me the most is just how none of this seems to matter to my fourth grade friends, Loretta and Edward in Sleetmute, who took me on a tour of their school, and showed me their playground, and told me about how they like to go on YouTube after school. So what surprises me about this is you could be sitting in a classroom with a ton of water damage in your ceiling and the ceiling tiles falling down around you, and you are still so eager to learn. And I found that really just very heartening. It made me proud of all these little kids who just go to school every day.

KYUK: So this week we’re going to be hearing a series of stories from your investigation. What can people expect to hear from this KYUK reporting?

Advertisement

Schwing: We’re going to talk a lot about the health impacts and what we know can happen from long term exposure to things like a bat infestation, or black mold, or raw sewage. You’re also going to hear about exactly how hard school districts work to ask the state for money and the upfront financial investment that rural school districts are making in the hope of securing funds from the lawmakers, and then that never comes to fruition. We’re seeing projects that have waited for, you know, five years or more, then 10 years to be funded and still haven’t been funded. So you’ll hear a lot about that, and then you’re also going to hear about the current discussion in the legislative session that’s happening in Juneau right now, and what lawmakers are talking about funding versus what constituents are telling lawmakers they really need.

KYUK: What do you hope to hear from people in KYUK’s listening region, from people in communities in these rural education attendance areas?

Schwing: I really am interested in the origins of some of these buildings, particularly the Molly Hootch-era schools. I want to know if there are people who remember going to school in these buildings. I want to know if there are people who helped build them. I really am very interested in the history of those older schools in particular, but honestly, I also really would love to hear from people about what the school as a building really means to the community, because we’re not always just talking about a place where kids go to class and teachers teach those classes. We’re talking about a place that serves the community in so many different ways, from community gatherings, to spring carnivals, to basketball tournaments, to funerals, potlatches, you name it, Cama’i, there’s so many ways that this school serves a community, and so I would love to hear from people about why it’s important to them. And I always love hearing a good story. So if somebody has, like, a memory, or just a really meaningful story to them about being in school, I want to hear about it.

KYUK: How can people get those stories to you?

Schwing: They can email me at emily@kyuk.org, and you can call me at 907-545-6228.

Advertisement

KYUK: Thank you so much for sharing about your reporting, Emily, we’re excited to listen to this first installment of your project.

Schwing: Thanks for having me, Sage. I’m excited for you to hear it.

This project is a partnership between KYUK and ProPublica investigating rural school infrastructure and spending in Alaska. Support for this reporting also comes from the USC Annenberg Center for Health Journalism and its Fund for Reporting on Child Well-Being and the Dennis A. Hunt Fund for Health Journalism.





Source link

Advertisement

Alaska

Many Alaska agencies still counting state regulations after Dunleavy orders rule reductions

Published

on

Many Alaska agencies still counting state regulations after Dunleavy orders rule reductions


A view from downtown Anchorage includes E Street and the Atwood Building. (Marc Lester / ADN)

Months after Gov. Mike Dunleavy ordered state agencies to begin reducing the number of regulations governing their operations, several have yet to complete a full tally of the baseline number of rules eligible for reduction.

Dunleavy in August issued an administrative order tasking all state agencies with reducing the number of regulations that dictate their operations by 15% by the end of 2026, and by 25% the following year.

In his order, Dunleavy said that reducing regulations was necessary to “attract investment and grow (Alaska’s) economic base.”

But state departments are behind schedule in achieving the initial phase of the order, which entails counting the number of regulatory requirements in each agency. That count was meant to be completed by mid-October, to serve as a baseline for agency reduction goals, according to an instructional document disseminated earlier this year.

Advertisement

According to an undated tally provided by the Department of Law on Wednesday, numerous agencies had been granted an extension until March 2 to count their regulations, including the Department of Administration, Department of Fish and Game, Department of Military and Veterans Affairs, the Department of Revenue, the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, the Division of Elections and the lieutenant governor’s office.

According to the governor’s plan, agencies have until Jan. 5 to submit a draft outline “setting forth regulations identified for reform based upon stakeholder meetings.”

Among departments that had tallied their regulations so far, the Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development was leading in the number of tallied restrictions, reporting a baseline of more than 30,000. Its goal was to cut that number to just under 26,000 by the end of 2026, and just under 23,000 by the end of 2027.

That department is charged with overseeing licensing for dozens of professions across the state, including doctors, nurses, pharmacists, optometrists, social workers, architects and accountants, among many others. Numerous professions in the state are governed in large part by regulation, rather than statute, allowing for boards and commissions to more easily update their requirements in response to evolving best practices.

The number of regulations varied widely among agencies. The Department of Health — which oversees the state’s Medicaid program, among numerous other responsibilities — reported a plan to reduce roughly 4,000 of its 16,000 regulations in a two-year period.

Advertisement

The Department of Corrections, meanwhile, reported having only 57 eligible regulations for reduction. Its goal was to cut that number to 54 next year and 47 the year after that.

When issuing his order, Dunleavy said he wanted to focus on permitting reform in the Department of Natural Resources — which is aiming to eliminate more than 700 of its 3,000 regulations — and the Department of Environmental Conservation, which planned to reduce more than 3,000 of its 13,000 regulatory requirements. The Department of Fish and Game, also identified for permitting reform, has so far counted 650 regulations but sought an extension to finish its baseline count.

The Department of Law, which is in charge of implementing the governor’s administrative order, did not provide an accounting of its own regulations or how it intended to reduce them.

Attorney General Stephen Cox said in a statement in September that the Department of Law “intends to be a model in this process” by publishing its own reform plans.

Assistant Attorney General Rebecca Polizzotto said last month that some departments had been granted extensions for counting their regulations “because of particular board meetings or how they want to do stakeholder engagement.”

Advertisement

Despite the extension granted, Polizzotto said she still expected “a majority of agencies” would be in “substantial compliance” with Dunleavy’s order by the end of 2026.

As for the following year — that will be up to the next governor. Dunleavy’s time as governor ends next year and he is termed out from seeking reelection. The next governor can keep the order in place, or repeal it.

Dunleavy’s regulatory reform effort follows initiatives from previous governors who also sought to reduce, update and clarify state rules. But Polizzotto said Dunleavy’s order is different.

“As opposed to just issuing the order, he actually has put together a program of how to effectuate that,” Polizzotto said in an interview last month.

Dunleavy’s regulation-slashing effort was launched shortly before he appointed Cox to serve as Alaska’s top attorney in August. Cox, who moved to Alaska in 2021, said he had been previously “involved in regulatory reform efforts at the federal level.” In an interview, he called Dunleavy’s administrative order “a very sophisticated program” that’s “modeled after best practices that have happened in other states.”

Advertisement

Alaska’s effort is modeled after a similar initiative in Virginia, where Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin earlier this year announced he had surpassed the 25% regulation reduction goal he had set in 2022.

According to a study conducted by the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, Alaska is already one of the least-regulated states in the country. Alaska ranked 44th out of 48 in the 2024 study (Arkansas and West Virginia were not included), with roughly 65,000 regulatory restrictions. For comparison, Virginia ranked 16th, with nearly 146,000 restrictions. California topped the list with 420,000 restrictions.

Polizzotto said that even if Alaska has fewer restrictions on the books, it still has work to do eliminating and updating old regulations that are no longer in use.

“That’s just not good law, and you should not have it on the books regardless of if you have fewer regulations than another state,” she said.

Asked why Dunleavy set a 25% reduction goal for every agency — rather than taking into account the vast variation in the number and scope of regulations in various agencies — Polizzotto the goal was to “strive for consistency.”

Advertisement

To make it easier to hit the governor’s target, the Department of Law is allowing agencies to use a variety of methods to achieve the reduction target, including by reducing the number of requirements for a given professional license, or by reducing the word count or page count in guidance documents for Alaskans seeking information on regulatory requirements.

“I don’t think we’ve come across any doubt that any agency can meet that 25% goal. Some agencies might need a little more assistance, but some agencies might be able to exceed that 25% goal, because they have so much that just hasn’t been cleaned up,” said Cox.





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Traversing the Alaska wilderness, Dick Griffith revealed its possibilities to future generations of adventurers

Published

on

Traversing the Alaska wilderness, Dick Griffith revealed its possibilities to future generations of adventurers


Dick Griffith, pictured at his Hillside home in Anchorage on July 22, 2008. (Bob Hallinen / ADN archive)

Roman Dial’s first encounter with Dick Griffith at the Alaska Mountain Wilderness Classic pretty much encapsulated the spirit of the man Dial called the “grandfather of modern Alaskan adventure.”

Griffith invited the 21-year-old Dial, who was traveling without a tent, to bunk with him while rain fell in Hope at the onset of the inaugural race. And then the white-haired Griffith proceeded to beat virtually the entire field of racers — most of whom were 30 years his junior — to the finish line in Homer.

Griffith, who died earlier this month at age 98, was a prodigious adventurer with a sharp wit who fostered a growing community of fellow explorers who shared his yearning for the Alaska outdoors.

Dial was one of the many acolytes who took Griffith’s outdoors ethos and applied it to his own adventures across the state.

Advertisement

“Someone once told me once that the outdoor adventure scene is like this big tapestry that we all add on to,” Dial said. “And where somebody else is sort of woven in something, we pick up and kind of riff on that. And he added a really big band to that tapestry, and then the rest of us are just sort of picking up where he left off.”

On that first meeting at the race in 1982, Dial and the other Alaska Mountain Wilderness Classic competitors got a sense of Griffith’s humor as well. In a story that is now Alaska outdoors lore, Griffith pulled a surprise move at the race’s first river crossing, grabbing an inflatable vinyl raft out of his pack and leaving the field in his rear view.

“You young guys may be fast, but you eat too much and don’t know nothin’,” Dial recalls Griffith quipping as he pushed off.

“Old age and treachery beats youth and skill every time.”

Kathy Sarns and Dick Griffith cross a river in Wrangell-St. Elias National Park during an Alaska Mountain Wilderness Classic race. (Photo provided by Kathy Sarns)

In those years, Griffith may have been known for his old age as much as anything. But it didn’t take long for the 50-something racing against a much younger crowd to make a mark.

Kathy Sarns was a teenager when she first met Griffith in the early 1980s, and the topic of the Alaska Mountain Wilderness Classic came up.

Advertisement

“He says, ‘You want to do that race? I think a girl could do that race,’ ” Sarns recalls. “And I’m thinking, ‘Who is this old guy?’ And then he says, ‘If you want to do the race, give me a call. I’ll take you.’ ”

Sarns took up Griffith on the offer and in 1984, she and her friend Diane Catsam became the first women to complete the race.

Dick Griffith leads Diane Catsam and Kathy Sarns through a portion of the Alaska Mountain Wilderness Classic from Hope to Homer. (Photo provided by Kathy Sarns)

Sarns said the adventures “fed his soul,” and were infectious for those who watched Griffith and joined him along the way.

“He motivated and inspired so many people by what he was doing,” Sarns said. “It’s like, well if he can do that, then I guess I could do this.”

By the time Dial and Sarns had met Griffith, he had already established a resume for exploring that was likely unmatched in the state.

In the late 1950s, Griffith walked 500 miles from Kaktovik to Anaktuvuk Pass, passing through the Brooks Range. Later he went from Kaktovik to Kotzebue in what is believed to be the first documented traverse of the range.

Advertisement

In total, Griffith logged over 10,000 miles in the Alaska and Canadian Arctic. He raced the 210-mile Iditaski multiple times.

Starting in his 60s, Griffith made annual trips north to tackle a 4,000-mile route from Unalakleet to Hudson Bay in northeastern Canada. At age 73, he completed the journey.

“The reason he did a lot of trips by himself is because nobody could keep up,” Dial said.

Dick Griffith, then 65, skis across Big Lake to complete the 200 mile Iditaski race in 1992. Griffith, the oldest competitor in the four-discipline Iditasport competition, left the three other skiers behind him. (Jim Lavrakas / ADN archive)

Born in Colorado, Griffith grew up in rural Wyoming during the Great Depression.

The first Griffith adventure that evolved into lore was the story of how he met his wife, Isabelle.

In 1949, Griffith was plotting a trip from Green River, Wyoming, to Lee’s Ferry, Arizona — a 900-mile trip down the Green and Colorado rivers.

Advertisement

Isabelle said she’d fund the trip if she could come along. She did, and the two were soon married. After a series of other river adventures, the couple moved to Alaska in 1954.

The couple had two children, son Barney and daughter Kimmer.

John Lapkass was introduced to Griffith through Barney, a friend with whom Lapkass shared outdoor adventures.

Like many, Lapkass connected with Griffith’s wry sense of humor. Griffith would write “Stolen from Dick Griffith” on all of his gear, often accompanied by his address.

In Alaska, Griffith basically pioneered rafting as a form of getting deep into the Alaska backcountry.

Advertisement

Anchorage’s Luc Mehl has himself explored large swaths of the state in a packraft. An outdoors educator and author, Mehl met Griffith over the years at the barbecues he hosted leading up to the Alaska Wilderness Classic.

Although he didn’t embark on any adventures with Griffith, Mehl was amazed at how much accomplished well into his 80s.

“There are people in these sports that show the rest of us what’s possible,” Mehl said. “It would be dangerous if everybody just tried what Dick did. But there is huge value in inspiration. Just to know it’s a possibility is pretty damn special.”

Griffith continued to explore and compete. He ran his last Alaska Mountain Wilderness Classic at age 81 and continued with rafting trips through the Grand Canyon into his late 80s.

Dick Griffith was a trailblazer in the outdoors/adventure community in Alaska with his early use of rafts to reach deep into the wilderness. (Photo provided by Kathy Sarns)

John Clark’s dad worked with Griffith on Amchitka Island in the early 1960s, assisting with drilling on the Aleutian island before it was used for nuclear testing.

Clark went to high school in Anchorage and regularly joined Griffith on a weekend ski, often tackling the Arctic Valley to Indian traverse.

Advertisement

Clark described the 21-mile trek through the Chugach Mountains as a “walk in the park” for Griffith, a brisk workout to keep him prepped for bigger adventures.

“I was a teenager and I liked to sleep in,” Clark said. “And he wouldn’t even ask me. He would just come knock on my door at 8 a.m. and say, ‘Get your skis.’ ”

Many of those adventures were done mostly anonymously as a course of habit with friends, some only finding out after the fact what Griffith had accomplished.

“He had the heart of an explorer,” Clark said. “Dick’s exploring 40 years ago would have been with the pure motivation of finding out if he could get from here to there.”

Griffith also was well-known for officiating marriages across the state. He married Sarns and her husband, Pat Irwin, as well as Lapkass and his wife.

Advertisement

“I don’t know how it started,” Lapkass said. “We weren’t the first but it was kind of special. Everybody sort of wanted him to do the honors.”

He would celebrate the matrimonies with annual “Still Married” parties at his house on the Hillside, open to both those who remained married and even those who didn’t. He continued to officiate marriages until the last few years.

As the community of outdoor enthusiasts grew, the parties at Griffith’s weren’t only held to celebrate marriages. He regularly had big gatherings at his house on Sundays and for the holidays, bringing together his “orphans,” many of whom had no immediate family in the state.

The gatherings were a great time to bring new friends into the fold and rehash old adventures. One story — perhaps more a favorite of guests than the host — involved an instance where Griffith had a bad case of frostbite on his backside after being battered by frigid tailwinds.

“I don’t know how many Thanksgiving or Christmas dinners we had there,” Sarns said. “Always plenty of food and lots of laughter, and that’s where we’d pull out the photos of him recovering in the hospital.”

Advertisement

In 2012, Alaska author Kaylene Johnson-Sullivan published “Canyons and Ice: The Wilderness Travels of Dick Griffith,” which covered his hundreds of adventures through Alaska and beyond.

The film “Canyons & Ice: The Last Run of Dick Griffith” documented his career and last trip through the Grand Canyon at age 89.

Dick Griffith, pictured in his Anchorage home. (Photo provided by John Clark)

While his achievements were documented in his later years, Lapkass said Griffith’s motivations for being in the wilderness were almost completely internal.

“He was quite an inspiration for a lot of folks,” Lapkass said. “He wasn’t looking for sponsorship, for money or big TV productions or anything. He just felt like doing it. So he did it. And that definitely impressed a lot of people. Because some folks, you know, they want to do stuff, but then they want to let everybody know that they did it.”

As his life went on, Griffith was deeply involved with the Eagle River Nature Center as a board member, trail worker and financial donor.

Perhaps Griffith’s biggest gift to the outdoors community was a dose of self-confidence, a little extra boost to reach that next peak.

Advertisement

“Everybody that came near him benefited,” Sarns said. “Just because it just made you think outside the box a little more, being around him. You may push yourself maybe a little more, whether it’s an extra mile or an extra 100 miles. For some people it was just, ‘Hey maybe I can just go climb that mountain after all.’ ”





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaskans brave the cold, wind to plunge into Goose Lake for Special Olympics Alaska

Published

on

Alaskans brave the cold, wind to plunge into Goose Lake for Special Olympics Alaska


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – At Saturday’s 17th Annual Polar Plunge for Special Olympics Alaska, participants jumped into Goose Lake’s chilly water for a cause.

“The wind today, it’s a cold one,” the organization’s President and CEO, Sarah Arts, said.

More than 800 people came out to jump into the lake, she said. They exceeded their fundraising goal by late morning.

She said it means a lot to the athletes to know that the community is behind them.

Advertisement

“Inclusion is such a big part of what we do, and sport is a universal language. And through sport, everyone can be included. And it’s so amazing to see the community out here,” Arts said.

She said there were hot tubs for participants to warm up in afterward they jumped into the lake.

“I have to give some shout-outs to South High School Partners Club. Those students had some very creative plunges. A couple of face plants, belly flops. We had a back flip. So, they’re really getting creative today,” she said.

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending