Connect with us

Technology

NASA announces plans to develop second Moon lander, alongside SpaceX’s Starship

Published

on

NASA announces plans to develop second Moon lander, alongside SpaceX’s Starship

At present, NASA introduced plans to develop a second human lunar lander for its Artemis program, the company’s main spaceflight initiative to ship people again to the Moon. To construct the car, the area company is asking on industrial area corporations to suggest ideas for landers that may take individuals to and from the Moon’s orbit and the lunar floor, with the aim of getting them prepared by 2026 or 2027 on the earliest.

NASA already holds a contract with industrial accomplice SpaceX to develop a lunar lander for Artemis, which goals to land the primary lady and the primary particular person of shade on the Moon. In 2021, the area company awarded a sole contract to SpaceX price $2.9 billion to develop the corporate’s future Starship car right into a lander that may take people to and from the lunar floor. As of now, each NASA and SpaceX are working towards conducting the primary Artemis lunar touchdown as early as 2025, although that timeline is taken into account unlikely.

NASA had initially needed to select two corporations to develop human lunar landers for Artemis as a way to encourage competitors and maintain down prices. The company was going to select the 2 winners from three finalists: SpaceX, Blue Origin, and Dynetics. However the company finally selected one, primarily attributable to finances constraints. For the yr 2021, NASA had requested $3.4 billion from Congress to fund the event of Artemis lunar landers however solely obtained $850 million, simply 25 p.c of what was requested. In consequence, NASA went with SpaceX, partially as a result of the corporate had provided probably the most reasonably priced bid.

Nonetheless, the choice to easily decide one firm didn’t sit nicely with the shedding finalists. Blue Origin proceeded to sue NASA in federal courtroom over the choice, although the corporate finally misplaced its case. Regardless of the lawsuit, NASA administrator Invoice Nelson expressed his want to ultimately have two lunar lander suppliers, with hopes that Congress would fund the initiative. And at one level, it seemed as if Congress would direct NASA to make that occur. In October, the Senate Appropriation Committee launched a invoice that may direct NASA to select a second firm to develop a lunar lander for Artemis. Nonetheless, the newest finances invoice that was signed for 2022 didn’t power NASA to try this, nevertheless it did give the area company the total $1.195 billion it requested for to develop lunar landers.

Now, forward of President Joe Biden’s finances request anticipated subsequent week, NASA is saying official plans to pick out one other firm’s lunar lander, because the company had needed to do all alongside. “Competitors results in higher, extra dependable outcomes,” Nelson mentioned throughout a press convention saying the information. “It advantages all people. It advantages NASA. It advantages the American individuals.” Nelson added: “I promised competitors, so right here it’s.” NASA now plans to place out a draft name for proposals on the finish of the month, with plans to launch a last name later this spring. Everybody however SpaceX will be capable to compete on this new competitors for a contract.

Advertisement

In mild of this announcement, NASA says it’ll make some adjustments to SpaceX’s current contract. NASA’s unique contract with the corporate has SpaceX conducting an uncrewed touchdown on the Moon as an illustration take a look at earlier than conducting the primary crewed touchdown within the mid-2020s. That first touchdown, which is able to mark NASA’s return to the Moon with people for the reason that Nineteen Seventies, will likely be known as Artemis III and will obtain loads of consideration. After that, SpaceX would have moved on to a brand new operational contract with NASA, the place the area company would purchase particular person flights of the Starship lander to proceed going again to the Moon.

Now, NASA plans to work with SpaceX below its unique contract to conduct a potential third crewed touchdown after Artemis III. Then after that, SpaceX and the brand new firm that NASA picks would presumably compete for upcoming Artemis missions — that’s, if the suppliers are prepared.

A whole lot of this depends upon buy-in from Congress, which can occur since some lawmakers indicated their want for NASA to select a second lunar lander. NASA wouldn’t say how a lot it plans to ask for in improvement funding, however with President Biden’s finances request scheduled for launch on March twenty eighth, the numbers needs to be out there pretty quickly. Nelson says he expects the funds to materialize. “We’re anticipating to have each Congress help and that of the Biden administration, and we’re anticipating to get this competitors began within the fiscal yr 2023 finances.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Technology

Logitech has ‘no plans’ for a subscription mouse

Published

on

Logitech has ‘no plans’ for a subscription mouse

Faber: The other day, in Ireland, in our innovation center there, one of our team members showed me a forever mouse with the comparison to a watch. This is a nice watch, not a super expensive watch, but I’m not planning to throw that watch away ever. So why would I be throwing my mouse or my keyboard away if it’s a fantastic-quality, well-designed, software-enabled mouse. The forever mouse is one of the things that we’d like to get to.

Patel: What made the mouse a forever mouse?

It was a little heavier, it had great software and services that you’d constantly update, and it was beautiful. So I don’t think we’re necessarily super far away from that.

But, again, I just come back to the cost. You sell me the mouse once. Maybe I’ll pay 200 bucks for it.

The business model obviously is the challenge there. So then software is even more important when you think about it. Can you come up with a service model? In our video conferencing business, that is now a very important part of the model, the services, and it’s critical for corporate customers.

Advertisement

Let’s come to that in a second because that makes sense to me. You sell managed services to enterprises. You price support contracts for cameras and whatever. That’s an ongoing need businesses have. I’m still stuck on, “You’re going to sell me a mouse once and it’s going to have ongoing software updates forever.”

Imagine it’s like your Rolex. You’re going to really love that.

But Rolex has to employ software engineers to ship me over-the-air updates forever.

But the artifact is like your Rolex, and then given that we know the technology that we attach to changes, it’s not going to be like your Rolex in that it doesn’t have to ever change. Our stuff will have to change, but does the hardware have to change? I’m not so sure. We’ll have to obviously fix it and figure out what that business model is. We’re not at the forever mouse today, but I’m intrigued by the thought.

It certainly will help with sustainability. There are two ways people have traditionally proposed monetizing hardware over time. It’s subscription fees and it’s advertising. Is there a third way that I don’t know about that you’re thinking of?

Advertisement

No. The third way is the traditional model of “we innovate and we have you upgrade.” That’s the current model. And we’re pretty damn good at that model because we have pretty damn good innovators around the company who do come up with fabulous products. 

That is definitely the model today. It’s not a bad model at all, especially since we’re continuing to design for more sustainable products. We’re continuing to recycle and refurbish products. All of that is good. But that said, I am intrigued by a forever mouse or forever video conferencing solution that you just update with software and create a business model around that.

I’m going to ask this very directly. Can you envision a subscription mouse?

Possibly.

And that would be the forever mouse?

Advertisement

Yeah.

So you pay a subscription for software updates to your mouse.

Yeah, and you never have to worry about it again, which is not unlike our video conferencing services today.

But it’s a mouse.

But it’s a mouse, yeah.

Advertisement

I think consumers might perceive those to be very different. 

[Laughs] Yes, but it’s gorgeous. Think about it like a diamond-encrusted mouse.

Continue Reading

Technology

Disney Plus, ESPN, and Hulu are all getting more expensive this October

Published

on

Disney Plus, ESPN, and Hulu are all getting more expensive this October

Disney is rolling out a new wave of price hikes that its subscribers will probably be none too pleased to be hit with. Beginning October 17th, individual monthly and annual plans for Disney Plus, Hulu, and ESPN are all going up.

Monthly subscriptions to Disney Plus with ads will jump from $8 a month to $10. The monthly Disney Plus ad-free tier will increase from $14 to $16, and annual ad-free plans will rise from their previous $140 price point to $160. Hulu’s ad-supported tier will rise from $8 / month and $80 / year to $10 / month and $100 / year, and monthly ad-free plans will jump from $18 to $19. ESPN Plus’ $11 / month and $110 / year plans will now cost $12 / month and $120 / year, respectively. And people subscribed to Disney’s basic and premium streaming bundles will also see their bills getting a bit more expensive this fall.

Along with the new prices, Disney Plus is also giving subscribers access to ABC News Live and a series of curated playlists serving up content from across the company’s portfolio beginning September 4th. The first playlist to hit the service will be focused on things for preschool-aged audiences, and Disney plans on launching four additional categories — Seasonal, Epic Stories (Marvel and Star Wars fare), Throwbacks (older shows and films), and Real Life (documentaries) — in the near future.

The playlist news tracks with past reports of Disney wanting to get into the FAST channel game to offer subscribers a low-effort way of finding things to watch. And while the price hikes similarly gel with Disney’s continued push for streaming profitability, the move isn’t likely to be a welcome change for viewers when it rolls out.

Continue Reading

Technology

EV paradise or charging hell? Alarming electric car secret exposed

Published

on

EV paradise or charging hell? Alarming electric car secret exposed

The surge in the adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) has brought an unexpected challenge to the forefront. Despite being the third-largest EV market in the nation, Los Angeles and its surrounding areas face a critical shortage of charging infrastructure. A recent study by real estate giant CBRE has dubbed this region a “charging desert,” highlighting the growing disparity between EV ownership and accessible charging options.

GET SECURITY ALERTS, EXPERT TIPS – SIGN UP FOR KURT’S NEWSLETTER – THE CYBERGUY REPORT HERE

Electric vehicle at a charging station (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)

What is a ‘charging desert’ and how was it discovered?

With an advanced digital mapping tool, CBRE assessed EV charging needs nationwide to help its clients. The tool’s purpose was to inform charging networks and property owners to locate and select the optimal locations to install new EV chargers.

This digital mapping tool combines data from approximately 80 sources, from mobile phones and housing type to EV ownership, to name a few. Comparing these sources gave CBRE valuable insights, such as whether most EV owners charge their vehicles at home or work.

Advertisement

HOW TO REMOVE YOUR PRIVATE DATA FROM THE INTERNET

EV paradise or charging hell? Alarming electric car secret exposed

Electric vehicle at a charging station (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)

THE TINY ELECTRIC CAR THAT COMES DISASSEMBLED AND DELIVERED IN BOXES

LA’s charging deserts: Key areas lacking sufficient EV infrastructure

The tool revealed that parts of L.A. have significant charging deserts, which are areas where there are not enough public, accessible fast-charging stations to meet the needs of the area. These areas include:

  • Inglewood
  • Long Beach
  • Sherman Oaks
  • Studio City
  • Lomita
  • Southwest Torrance
  • Westwood (UCLA)
  • Fullerton (Cal State Fullerton)
  • Redondo Beach
EV paradise or charging hell? Alarming electric car secret exposed

Electric vehicle at a charging station (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)

SUPER SLICK ELECTRIC BEAST TAKES YOU FROM CITY STREETS TO MOUNTAIN PEAKS

Why are there ‘charging deserts’?

A variety of factors lead to a “charging desert,” including but not limited to a strong rental market in which most people do not have the ability to charge in their homes. 

Advertisement

For example, Inglewood is made up of almost 70% of renters. And despite more than 1,000 registered EVs in the area and even more driving through daily, there are no public chargers in that area. Additionally, there are issues of inadequate power infrastructure, such as electrical substations for distributing additional power. Also, in densely populated urban areas like L.A., limited parking space makes it challenging to install charging stations.

However, Los Angeles is installing EV chargers on light poles to help meet the growing demand for electric vehicle charging infrastructure.

SUBSCRIBE TO KURT’S YOUTUBE CHANNEL FOR QUICK VIDEO TIPS ON HOW TO WORK ALL OF YOUR TECH DEVICES

EV paradise or charging hell? Alarming electric car secret exposed

Electric vehicle at a charging station (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)

GET READY FOR A FOLDABLE ELECTRIC CAR THAT MAKES PARKING A BREEZE

Challenges of EV charging infrastructure in the US

The electric vehicle (EV) market in the U.S. is witnessing significant growth, with over 1 million EVs sold last year, marking a record high. However, the share of electric vehicles in light-vehicle sales has seen a slight decline, dropping from 8.1% in Q4 2023 to 7% in Q1 2024, as reported by Cox Automotive. Despite this dip, research indicates a “second, significant wave” of potential EV buyers is anticipated in the latter half of the decade.

Advertisement

CBRE’s recent analysis underscores the considerable gap that remains in the charging infrastructure necessary to facilitate this shift, emphasizing the urgency for enhanced investment and development in EV charging solutions.

Kurt’s key takeaways

Even though Los Angeles has nearly 588,000 EVs registered to make up 4.2% of the cars being driven, there are huge gaps in readily available EV charging options. Though the city of L.A. is working to help meet this demand by installing chargers on light poles, L.A. and the rest of the U.S. have a long way to go before having the infrastructure to support America’s shift from gasoline-powered vehicles.

Do you have an EV? If so, has charging been a challenge? Let us know by writing us at Cyberguy.com/Contact.

For more of my tech tips and security alerts, subscribe to my free CyberGuy Report Newsletter by heading to Cyberguy.com/Newsletter.

Ask Kurt a question or let us know what stories you’d like us to cover.

Advertisement

Follow Kurt on his social channels:

Answers to the most asked CyberGuy questions:

Copyright 2024 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Trending