Connect with us

Technology

Elon Musk’s rapid unscheduled disassembly of the US government

Published

on

Elon Musk’s rapid unscheduled disassembly of the US government

Almost 250 years after the Declaration of Independence, America has gotten herself a new king. His name is Elon Musk.

“Wait a minute,” you may be saying. “What about President Donald Trump?” Trump ran, much like Silvio Berlusconi before him, primarily to avoid prosecutions. He has never liked being president and he has already gotten what he wants. He’s not the power center. Musk is.

Consequently I will not be bothering with whatever statements Katie Miller of DOGE and White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt are putting out. We all have eyes; we can see what is going on. Musk has taken over the civilian government. This is a billionaire pulling a heist on the entire nation.

Here are the things Musk has installed his IT Renfields at:

We all learned in 2022, with the weaponization of SWIFT, that technical systems are a source of power. By controlling the infrastructure, Musk controls the nation. The two most obviously significant agencies on that list are the Treasury, which controls the money, and the Department of Energy, which controls the nuclear secrets. Less obviously significant but equally troubling is the General Services Administration, which is effectively the infrastructure of the government itself.

Advertisement

“Continued access to any payment systems by DOGE members, even ‘read only,’ likely poses the single greatest insider threat risk the Bureau of the Fiscal Service has ever faced.”

The GSA, an agency most of us have never had to think about, is in charge of buildings, sure. But also it runs an awful lot of the technical infrastructure of the government — it is basically the feds’ IT. If the US government were a brain, the GSA is the brain stem, the part that manages heartbeats and breathing so they’re below the level of thoughts.

“This is the largest data breach and the largest IT security breach in our country’s history—at least that’s publicly known,” a contractor who’s worked on classified systems at government agencies told The Atlantic.

Here’s the threat intelligence team at the Treasury, as reported by Wired, just to underline the seriousness of Musk’s access: “We further recommend that DOGE members be placed under insider threat monitoring and alerting after their access to payment systems is revoked. Continued access to any payment systems by DOGE members, even ‘read only,’ likely poses the single greatest insider threat risk the Bureau of the Fiscal Service has ever faced.” After The Washington Post inquired about that memo, the person who wrote it was ”removed” by contractor Booz Allen. But a second warning memo was also sent by a Treasury insider, warning of risks from DOGE.

Judge Paul Englemayer granted a temporary restraining order to 19 states seeking to halt Musk and crew’s access to the Treasury systems. Englemayer wrote that the states would experience “irreparable harm in the absence of injunctive relief.” Why? “Both because of the risk that the new policy presents of the disclosure of sensitive and confidential information and the heightened risk that the systems in question will be more vulnerable than before to hacking,” he wrote.

Advertisement

Is anyone checking to see if the court order will be followed?

Fantastic. This is an agency that controls $5 trillion, and contains sensitive personal information for — among others — American spies abroad. It’s also, by the way, tax season. And now Trump says that “we have less debt than we thought of?” Boy, that sounds like a fun new way to default on a loan. It’s a terrifying prospect if you are a finance-knower: US bonds are the safest assets in the world, at least for now, and making them risky shakes the foundation of the global financial system. On the other hand, Trump might just be saying shit again.

Oh, sure, yes, there are those challenges in the courts to Musk’s access to the Treasury, and to shutting down USAID, which may well have been illegal. Here’s the thing: Musk doesn’t care about laws. Remember when he was meant to receive a “Twitter sitter” after the time he pretended he wanted to take Tesla private? The courts ordered one. It has never appeared. Or maybe we should talk about the depositions he hasn’t shown up for. Or all the government requests to fix Tesla’s so-called Autopilot that he’s ignored. And given the lying about the Treasury access, I don’t think we can rule out the possibility that Musk and co. simply lie under oath. He’s also got himself a cadre of elite lawyers, two of whom clerked for conservative Supreme Court justices, to argue for him in court.

So it’s no real surprise that he’s posting stuff on X that indicates he isn’t taking the court order to back away from the Treasury seriously. “Corrupt judges protecting corruption,” Musk wrote of the court order. Congressman Darrell Issa wrote that he was “immediately introducing legislation next week to stop these rogue judges,” which Musk quoted with American flag emoji. Vice President JD Vance, the nation’s highest-ranking kiss-ass, wrote on X, “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power.” Vance has always been in the running to be Yale Law School’s most embarrassing graduate, a competitive endeavor; calling for a coup in violation of his oath of office and a basic understanding of the Constitution pretty much cements him at the top of the list.

Are we still a nation of laws? Is anyone checking to see if the court order will be followed? About the only things Musk hasn’t taken over are the military and law enforcement. What happens if he obviously ignores a court order, and the court issues a warrant for his arrest? Does domestic law enforcement side with the court or with Musk?

Advertisement

The Republicans are ready to make a horse a consul

Regardless of Musk’s personal contempt for the law, there’s also the fact of the January 6th pardons, which sent a clear message: breaking the law is okay, as long as Trump thinks it’s okay. And since Trump is effectively Musk’s puppet, Musk has carte blanche. The most these court orders might do is give cover to staffers at these departments to deny Musk’s team access to the things they want. Of course, we already know those staffers can be fired and replaced.

What has our Congress been up to while this hostile takeover of our government has been happening in plain sight? Well, the Democrats are still writing strongly worded letters, and showing up at protests, and allowing glorified mall cops to turn them away from the departments Musk has already conquered. The closest they’ve come to action is Senator Cory Booker’s threat of a debt default or government shutdown. The Republicans… aside from the ones vociferously approving of Musk usurping their control over the nation’s spending, they appear to be Milford Men. They are ready to make a horse a consul.

Musk is now flexing his power. After his staffer Marko Elez resigned for saying he “was racist before it was cool,” Musk put up a poll on X, the go-to groyper platform, asking if Elez should be reinstated. As of this writing, the answer was “yes.” Elez had read and write access to the Treasury’s systems.

Should Elez come back? Local lapdog Vance thinks so! (Sure sounds like Vance is taking orders from Musk rather than the other way around.) Musk then posted that Elez “will be brought back.” That does rather make it clear who’s in charge, doesn’t it?

Advertisement

“The Man Who Knew Nothing about Risk.”

So now that Musk has control of the guts of the government, let’s consider his extraordinarily reckless history with payments and IT systems. When Musk was running the company that would become PayPal, it had what his coworker and buddy Peter Thiel called “a runaway fraud problem.” When Thiel thought about writing a book about the experience, he said he’d title the Musk chapter “The Man Who Knew Nothing about Risk.”

This may explain why Musk has hired Edward Coristine, who was fired from a cybersecurity firm for “leaking internal information to the competitors,” according to an internal message reported by Bloomberg. Oh, and also he’s on a watch list for federal cybercrime enforcement, and worked at a startup with convicted hackers. Now, of course, he’s got access to our government’s internal systems. Neat! Also there’s Gavin Kliger, who seems to have his own interest in white supremacy. It’s unclear what he does at the Office of Personnel Management, but he probably should not be in that building at all.

No wonder they’re hiding from the regular USDS employees.

This kind of sloppiness makes sense for those of us who followed Musk’s Twitter takeover. Musk has a real interest in moving fast and breaking things, with an emphasis on breaking things. For instance, there’s the time a “bug” restored deleted tweets. Or that time private tweets were made public. Or the older images that no longer displayed.

Advertisement

Bad news for Blue Origin and OpenAI: King Elon holds a grudge

Now, imagine this at the Treasury, with a bunch of children who don’t know COBOL toying with the systems. Even a slight bug can fuck up trillions of dollars — during tax season. I don’t want to think about what happens with a bug in the code at DoE, because one possible answer is a leak of our nuclear secrets — which is something we, as a nation, used to take so seriously that we executed people.

Oh sure, Secretary of Energy Chris Wright says that the DOGE dorks don’t have access to nuclear secrets but hey, remember when the Treasury said DOGE didn’t have write access and that was not true at all?

Hm!
Kristen Radtke / The Verge; Getty Images

Even discounting the possibility of some catastrophic mistake, let’s think about what success would look like for King Elon. Judging by his constant, unhinged posts on X, his hiring practices, and his support of Germany’s far-right party, it seems like he’s down with white supremacy. That also clears up any question about his let’s-argue-about-whether-it’s-a-Nazi-salute “gesture” at the inauguration; it was meant both to signal he could say or do anything he wants without consequence and to fire up his base of racists. So that probably means immigration cutoffs except in the cases of H-1bs that now work like indentured servitude, and government pressure on anyone who hires women, trans people, or non-white men. The non-prosecution of hate crimes, obviously. I’m not confident in continued protections for abortion or even birth control, because of Musk’s weird pronatalist thing.

Advertisement

Musk’s paramount goal, however, is always for Musk to acquire more money and power. This usually comes at the expense of literally everyone else.

So it’s not hard to imagine that means his AI endeavor gets embedded in the government, X becomes the main platform for all government communications (and maybe also the main payment provider, just like WeChat, because that’s the kind of thing you can do in an authoritarian government), Starlink becomes the de facto internet provider, and suddenly every government official drives a Cybertruck. What happens to the other tech giants? Well, turns out they were sucking up to the wrong guy. Bad news for Blue Origin and OpenAI: King Elon holds a grudge.

The military has been suspiciously quiet about this direct threat to national security

Anyone who objects gets shipped to Guantanamo, or better yet, El Salvador. After all, Musk already has a pet prosecutor, Ed Martin, who (while not advocating for the last wave of insurrectionists) told Musk that he’d begin proceedings at Musk’s referral and anyone who has “broken the law or even acted simply unethically” can expected to be chased “to the end of the Earth.” This is to say nothing of the possibility of stochastic violence from white supremacists, spurred by posts on X.

The only thing we all really have going for us is that Musk has a tiny team. Sure, they can download a ton of sensitive government data — not great! — but they can’t run all of these agencies at once. And none of these people has the 20 years’ experience with COBOL that would be necessary to take this stuff over quickly. Leaving aside Musk’s propensity for fucking around and finding out, his ability to control all these systems remains somewhat limited by his staffing. Maybe he can get Trump’s people to help him, but given Musk’s arrogance, I suspect Musk will want to hand-pick a team; I’d guess he assumes Trump’s people are idiots, given how easily he’s run through them.

Advertisement

But the more systems Musk has access to, and the more data he can futz around with, the more likely it becomes that something catastrophic happens. Because it seems Congress won’t act, and Musk can ignore the courts at will, it seems that the defense of citizens’ private data, classified information, and all government payments falls on government staffers and their unions alone.

There’s a reason Musk-hater Steve Bannon has been daring him to start taking a look at the Pentagon. Bannon knows that’s where this all falls apart. The military has been suspiciously quiet about this direct threat to national security, and there’s no telling how the spies feel. Given how much of the government Musk has taken over, an anti-Musk junta isn’t beyond the pale — and while Musk presumably has private security, there are a lot more people in, say, the Army.

This strikes me as an all-or-nothing action for Musk. If he wins, he rules the most powerful nation on Earth. If he loses, he’s going to have legal headaches for the rest of his life, maybe even the sort that land him in jail. X continues to hemorrhage money, Tesla’s declining sales catch up with the company, and maybe worst for him, he’s publicly humiliated — having gone from King Musk to nothing at all. I expect him to fight tooth and nail to hold on to the power he’s grabbed. The question is if he’ll have to.

Technology

Defense secretary Pete Hegseth designates Anthropic a supply chain risk

Published

on

Defense secretary Pete Hegseth designates Anthropic a supply chain risk

This week, Anthropic delivered a master class in arrogance and betrayal as well as a textbook case of how not to do business with the United States Government or the Pentagon.

Our position has never wavered and will never waver: the Department of War must have full, unrestricted access to Anthropic’s models for every LAWFUL purpose in defense of the Republic.

Instead, @AnthropicAI and its CEO @DarioAmodei, have chosen duplicity. Cloaked in the sanctimonious rhetoric of “effective altruism,” they have attempted to strong-arm the United States military into submission – a cowardly act of corporate virtue-signaling that places Silicon Valley ideology above American lives.

The Terms of Service of Anthropic’s defective altruism will never outweigh the safety, the readiness, or the lives of American troops on the battlefield.

Their true objective is unmistakable: to seize veto power over the operational decisions of the United States military. That is unacceptable.

Advertisement

As President Trump stated on Truth Social, the Commander-in-Chief and the American people alone will determine the destiny of our armed forces, not unelected tech executives.

Anthropic’s stance is fundamentally incompatible with American principles. Their relationship with the United States Armed Forces and the Federal Government has therefore been permanently altered.

In conjunction with the President’s directive for the Federal Government to cease all use of Anthropic’s technology, I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a Supply-Chain Risk to National Security. Effective immediately, no contractor, supplier, or partner that does business with the United States military may conduct any commercial activity with Anthropic. Anthropic will continue to provide the Department of War its services for a period of no more than six months to allow for a seamless transition to a better and more patriotic service.

America’s warfighters will never be held hostage by the ideological whims of Big Tech. This decision is final.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Technology

What Trump’s ‘ratepayer protection pledge’ means for you

Published

on

What Trump’s ‘ratepayer protection pledge’ means for you

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

When you open a chatbot, stream a show or back up photos to the cloud, you are tapping into a vast network of data centers. These facilities power artificial intelligence, search engines and online services we use every day. Now there is a growing debate over who should pay for the electricity those data centers consume.

During President Trump’s State of the Union address this week, he introduced a new initiative called the “ratepayer protection pledge” to shift AI-driven electricity costs away from consumers. The core idea is simple. 

Tech companies that run energy-intensive AI data centers should cover the cost of the extra electricity they require rather than passing those costs on to everyday customers through higher utility rates.

It sounds simple. The hard part is what happens next.

Advertisement

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.

At the State of the Union address Feb. 24, 2026, President Trump unveiled the “ratepayer protection pledge” aimed at shielding consumers from rising electricity costs tied to AI data centers. (Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)

Why AI is driving a surge in electricity demand

AI systems require enormous computing power. That computing power requires enormous electricity. Today’s data centers can consume as much power as a small city. As AI tools expand across business, healthcare, finance and consumer apps, energy demand has risen sharply in certain regions.

Utilities have warned that the current grid in many parts of the country was not built for this level of concentrated demand. Upgrading substations, transmission lines and generation capacity costs money. Traditionally, those costs can influence rates paid by homes and small businesses. That is where the pledge comes in.

What the ratepayer protection pledge is designed to do

Under the ratepayer protection pledge, large technology companies would:

Advertisement
  • Cover the full cost of additional electricity tied to their data centers
  • Build their own on-site power generation to reduce strain on the public grid

Supporters say this approach separates residential energy costs from large-scale AI expansion. In other words, your household bill should not rise simply because a new AI data center opens nearby. So far, Anthropic is the clearest public backer. CyberGuy reached out to Anthropic for a comment on its role in the pledge. A company spokesperson referred us to a tweet from Anthropic Head of External Affairs Sarah Heck.

“American families shouldn’t pick up the tab for AI,” Heck wrote in a post on X. “In support of the White House ratepayer protection pledge, Anthropic has committed to covering 100% of electricity price increases that consumers face from our data centers.”

That makes Anthropic one of the first major AI companies to publicly state it will absorb consumer electricity price increases tied to its data center operations. Other major firms may be close behind. The White House reportedly plans to host Microsoft, Meta and Anthropic in early March to discuss formalizing a broader deal, though attendance and final terms have not been confirmed publicly.

Microsoft also expressed support for the initiative. 

“The ratepayer protection pledge is an important step,” Brad Smith, Microsoft vice chair and president, said in a statement to CyberGuy. “We appreciate the administration’s work to ensure that data centers don’t contribute to higher electricity prices for consumers.”  

Industry groups also point to companies such as Google and utilities including Duke Energy and Georgia Power as making consumer-focused commitments tied to data center growth. However, enforcement mechanisms and long-term regulatory details remain unclear.

Advertisement

CHINA VS SPACEX IN RACE FOR SPACE AI DATA CENTERS

The White House plans talks with Microsoft, Meta and Anthropic about shifting AI energy costs away from consumers. (Eli Hiller/For The Washington Post via Getty Images)

How this could change the economics of AI

AI infrastructure is already one of the most expensive technology buildouts in history. Companies are investing billions in chips, servers and real estate. If firms must also finance dedicated power plants or pay premium rates for grid upgrades, the cost of running AI systems increases further. That could lead to:

  • Slower expansion in some markets
  • Greater investment in renewable energy and storage
  • More partnerships between tech firms and utilities

Energy strategy may become just as important as computing strategy. For consumers, this shift signals that electricity is now a central part of the AI conversation. AI is no longer only about software. It is also about infrastructure.

The bigger consumer tech picture

AI is becoming embedded in smartphones, search engines, office software and home devices. As adoption grows, so does the hidden infrastructure supporting it. Energy is now part of the conversation around everyday technology. Every AI-generated image, voice command or cloud backup depends on a power-hungry network of servers.

By asking companies to account more directly for their electricity use, policymakers are acknowledging a new reality. The digital world runs on very physical resources. For you, that shift could mean more transparency. It also raises new questions about sustainability, local impact and long-term costs.

Advertisement

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE HELPS FUEL NEW ENERGY SOURCES

As AI expansion strains the grid, a new proposal would require tech firms to fund their own power needs. (Sameer Al-Doumy/AFP via Getty Images)

What this means for you

If you are a homeowner or renter, the practical question is simple. Will this protect my electric bill? In theory, separating data center energy costs from residential rates could reduce the risk of price spikes tied to AI growth. If companies fund their own generation or grid upgrades, utilities may have less reason to spread those costs among all customers.

That said, utility pricing is complex. It depends on state regulators, long-term planning and local energy markets.

Here is what you can watch for in your area:

Advertisement
  • New data center construction announcements
  • Utility filings that mention large commercial load growth
  • Public service commission decisions on rate adjustments

Even if you rarely use AI tools, your community could feel the effects of a nearby data center. The pledge is intended to keep those large-scale power demands from showing up in your monthly bill.

Take my quiz: How safe is your online security?

Think your devices and data are truly protected? Take this quick quiz to see where your digital habits stand. From passwords to Wi-Fi settings, you’ll get a personalized breakdown of what you’re doing right and what needs improvement. Take my Quiz here: Cyberguy.com.

Kurt’s key takeaways

The ratepayer protection pledge highlights an important turning point. AI is no longer only about innovation and speed. It is also about energy and accountability. If tech companies truly absorb the cost of their expanding power needs, households may avoid some of the financial strain tied to rapid AI growth. If not, utility bills could become an unexpected front line in the AI era.

As AI tools become part of daily life, how much extra power are you willing to support to keep them running? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide – free when you join my CYBERGUY.COM newsletter.

Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.

Related Article

Scoop: Trump brings Big Tech to White House to curb power costs amid AI boom
Advertisement
Continue Reading

Technology

Here’s your first look at Kratos in Amazon’s God of War show

Published

on

Here’s your first look at Kratos in Amazon’s God of War show

Amazon has slowly been teasing out casting details for its live-action adaptation of God of War, and now we have our first look at the show. It’s a single image but a notable one showing protagonist Kratos and his son Atreus. The characters are played by Ryan Hurst and Callum Vinson, respectively, and they look relatively close to their video game counterparts.

There aren’t a lot of other details about the show just yet, but this is Amazon’s official description:

The God of War series storyline follows father and son Kratos and Atreus as they embark on a journey to spread the ashes of their wife and mother, Faye. Through their adventures, Kratos tries to teach his son to be a better god, while Atreus tries to teach his father how to be a better human.

That sounds a lot like the recent soft reboot of the franchise, which started with 2018’s God of War and continued through Ragnarök in 2022. For the Amazon series, Ronald D. Moore, best-known for his work on For All Mankind and Battlestar Galactica, will serve as showrunner. The rest of the cast includes: Mandy Patinkin (Odin), Ed Skrein (Baldur), Max Parker (Heimdall), Ólafur Darri Ólafsson (Thor), Teresa Palmer (Sif), Alastair Duncan (Mimir), Jeff Gulka (Sindri), and Danny Woodburn (Brok).

While production is underway on the God of War series, there’s no word on when it might start streaming.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending