Almost 250 years after the Declaration of Independence, America has gotten herself a new king. His name is Elon Musk.
Technology
Elon Musk’s rapid unscheduled disassembly of the US government
“Wait a minute,” you may be saying. “What about President Donald Trump?” Trump ran, much like Silvio Berlusconi before him, primarily to avoid prosecutions. He has never liked being president and he has already gotten what he wants. He’s not the power center. Musk is.
Consequently I will not be bothering with whatever statements Katie Miller of DOGE and White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt are putting out. We all have eyes; we can see what is going on. Musk has taken over the civilian government. This is a billionaire pulling a heist on the entire nation.
Here are the things Musk has installed his IT Renfields at:
We all learned in 2022, with the weaponization of SWIFT, that technical systems are a source of power. By controlling the infrastructure, Musk controls the nation. The two most obviously significant agencies on that list are the Treasury, which controls the money, and the Department of Energy, which controls the nuclear secrets. Less obviously significant but equally troubling is the General Services Administration, which is effectively the infrastructure of the government itself.
“Continued access to any payment systems by DOGE members, even ‘read only,’ likely poses the single greatest insider threat risk the Bureau of the Fiscal Service has ever faced.”
The GSA, an agency most of us have never had to think about, is in charge of buildings, sure. But also it runs an awful lot of the technical infrastructure of the government — it is basically the feds’ IT. If the US government were a brain, the GSA is the brain stem, the part that manages heartbeats and breathing so they’re below the level of thoughts.
“This is the largest data breach and the largest IT security breach in our country’s history—at least that’s publicly known,” a contractor who’s worked on classified systems at government agencies told The Atlantic.
Here’s the threat intelligence team at the Treasury, as reported by Wired, just to underline the seriousness of Musk’s access: “We further recommend that DOGE members be placed under insider threat monitoring and alerting after their access to payment systems is revoked. Continued access to any payment systems by DOGE members, even ‘read only,’ likely poses the single greatest insider threat risk the Bureau of the Fiscal Service has ever faced.” After The Washington Post inquired about that memo, the person who wrote it was ”removed” by contractor Booz Allen. But a second warning memo was also sent by a Treasury insider, warning of risks from DOGE.
Judge Paul Englemayer granted a temporary restraining order to 19 states seeking to halt Musk and crew’s access to the Treasury systems. Englemayer wrote that the states would experience “irreparable harm in the absence of injunctive relief.” Why? “Both because of the risk that the new policy presents of the disclosure of sensitive and confidential information and the heightened risk that the systems in question will be more vulnerable than before to hacking,” he wrote.
Is anyone checking to see if the court order will be followed?
Fantastic. This is an agency that controls $5 trillion, and contains sensitive personal information for — among others — American spies abroad. It’s also, by the way, tax season. And now Trump says that “we have less debt than we thought of?” Boy, that sounds like a fun new way to default on a loan. It’s a terrifying prospect if you are a finance-knower: US bonds are the safest assets in the world, at least for now, and making them risky shakes the foundation of the global financial system. On the other hand, Trump might just be saying shit again.
Oh, sure, yes, there are those challenges in the courts to Musk’s access to the Treasury, and to shutting down USAID, which may well have been illegal. Here’s the thing: Musk doesn’t care about laws. Remember when he was meant to receive a “Twitter sitter” after the time he pretended he wanted to take Tesla private? The courts ordered one. It has never appeared. Or maybe we should talk about the depositions he hasn’t shown up for. Or all the government requests to fix Tesla’s so-called Autopilot that he’s ignored. And given the lying about the Treasury access, I don’t think we can rule out the possibility that Musk and co. simply lie under oath. He’s also got himself a cadre of elite lawyers, two of whom clerked for conservative Supreme Court justices, to argue for him in court.
So it’s no real surprise that he’s posting stuff on X that indicates he isn’t taking the court order to back away from the Treasury seriously. “Corrupt judges protecting corruption,” Musk wrote of the court order. Congressman Darrell Issa wrote that he was “immediately introducing legislation next week to stop these rogue judges,” which Musk quoted with American flag emoji. Vice President JD Vance, the nation’s highest-ranking kiss-ass, wrote on X, “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power.” Vance has always been in the running to be Yale Law School’s most embarrassing graduate, a competitive endeavor; calling for a coup in violation of his oath of office and a basic understanding of the Constitution pretty much cements him at the top of the list.
Are we still a nation of laws? Is anyone checking to see if the court order will be followed? About the only things Musk hasn’t taken over are the military and law enforcement. What happens if he obviously ignores a court order, and the court issues a warrant for his arrest? Does domestic law enforcement side with the court or with Musk?
The Republicans are ready to make a horse a consul
Regardless of Musk’s personal contempt for the law, there’s also the fact of the January 6th pardons, which sent a clear message: breaking the law is okay, as long as Trump thinks it’s okay. And since Trump is effectively Musk’s puppet, Musk has carte blanche. The most these court orders might do is give cover to staffers at these departments to deny Musk’s team access to the things they want. Of course, we already know those staffers can be fired and replaced.
What has our Congress been up to while this hostile takeover of our government has been happening in plain sight? Well, the Democrats are still writing strongly worded letters, and showing up at protests, and allowing glorified mall cops to turn them away from the departments Musk has already conquered. The closest they’ve come to action is Senator Cory Booker’s threat of a debt default or government shutdown. The Republicans… aside from the ones vociferously approving of Musk usurping their control over the nation’s spending, they appear to be Milford Men. They are ready to make a horse a consul.
Musk is now flexing his power. After his staffer Marko Elez resigned for saying he “was racist before it was cool,” Musk put up a poll on X, the go-to groyper platform, asking if Elez should be reinstated. As of this writing, the answer was “yes.” Elez had read and write access to the Treasury’s systems.
Should Elez come back? Local lapdog Vance thinks so! (Sure sounds like Vance is taking orders from Musk rather than the other way around.) Musk then posted that Elez “will be brought back.” That does rather make it clear who’s in charge, doesn’t it?
“The Man Who Knew Nothing about Risk.”
So now that Musk has control of the guts of the government, let’s consider his extraordinarily reckless history with payments and IT systems. When Musk was running the company that would become PayPal, it had what his coworker and buddy Peter Thiel called “a runaway fraud problem.” When Thiel thought about writing a book about the experience, he said he’d title the Musk chapter “The Man Who Knew Nothing about Risk.”
This may explain why Musk has hired Edward Coristine, who was fired from a cybersecurity firm for “leaking internal information to the competitors,” according to an internal message reported by Bloomberg. Oh, and also he’s on a watch list for federal cybercrime enforcement, and worked at a startup with convicted hackers. Now, of course, he’s got access to our government’s internal systems. Neat! Also there’s Gavin Kliger, who seems to have his own interest in white supremacy. It’s unclear what he does at the Office of Personnel Management, but he probably should not be in that building at all.
No wonder they’re hiding from the regular USDS employees.
This kind of sloppiness makes sense for those of us who followed Musk’s Twitter takeover. Musk has a real interest in moving fast and breaking things, with an emphasis on breaking things. For instance, there’s the time a “bug” restored deleted tweets. Or that time private tweets were made public. Or the older images that no longer displayed.
Bad news for Blue Origin and OpenAI: King Elon holds a grudge
Now, imagine this at the Treasury, with a bunch of children who don’t know COBOL toying with the systems. Even a slight bug can fuck up trillions of dollars — during tax season. I don’t want to think about what happens with a bug in the code at DoE, because one possible answer is a leak of our nuclear secrets — which is something we, as a nation, used to take so seriously that we executed people.
Oh sure, Secretary of Energy Chris Wright says that the DOGE dorks don’t have access to nuclear secrets but hey, remember when the Treasury said DOGE didn’t have write access and that was not true at all?
Even discounting the possibility of some catastrophic mistake, let’s think about what success would look like for King Elon. Judging by his constant, unhinged posts on X, his hiring practices, and his support of Germany’s far-right party, it seems like he’s down with white supremacy. That also clears up any question about his let’s-argue-about-whether-it’s-a-Nazi-salute “gesture” at the inauguration; it was meant both to signal he could say or do anything he wants without consequence and to fire up his base of racists. So that probably means immigration cutoffs except in the cases of H-1bs that now work like indentured servitude, and government pressure on anyone who hires women, trans people, or non-white men. The non-prosecution of hate crimes, obviously. I’m not confident in continued protections for abortion or even birth control, because of Musk’s weird pronatalist thing.
Musk’s paramount goal, however, is always for Musk to acquire more money and power. This usually comes at the expense of literally everyone else.
So it’s not hard to imagine that means his AI endeavor gets embedded in the government, X becomes the main platform for all government communications (and maybe also the main payment provider, just like WeChat, because that’s the kind of thing you can do in an authoritarian government), Starlink becomes the de facto internet provider, and suddenly every government official drives a Cybertruck. What happens to the other tech giants? Well, turns out they were sucking up to the wrong guy. Bad news for Blue Origin and OpenAI: King Elon holds a grudge.
The military has been suspiciously quiet about this direct threat to national security
Anyone who objects gets shipped to Guantanamo, or better yet, El Salvador. After all, Musk already has a pet prosecutor, Ed Martin, who (while not advocating for the last wave of insurrectionists) told Musk that he’d begin proceedings at Musk’s referral and anyone who has “broken the law or even acted simply unethically” can expected to be chased “to the end of the Earth.” This is to say nothing of the possibility of stochastic violence from white supremacists, spurred by posts on X.
The only thing we all really have going for us is that Musk has a tiny team. Sure, they can download a ton of sensitive government data — not great! — but they can’t run all of these agencies at once. And none of these people has the 20 years’ experience with COBOL that would be necessary to take this stuff over quickly. Leaving aside Musk’s propensity for fucking around and finding out, his ability to control all these systems remains somewhat limited by his staffing. Maybe he can get Trump’s people to help him, but given Musk’s arrogance, I suspect Musk will want to hand-pick a team; I’d guess he assumes Trump’s people are idiots, given how easily he’s run through them.
But the more systems Musk has access to, and the more data he can futz around with, the more likely it becomes that something catastrophic happens. Because it seems Congress won’t act, and Musk can ignore the courts at will, it seems that the defense of citizens’ private data, classified information, and all government payments falls on government staffers and their unions alone.
There’s a reason Musk-hater Steve Bannon has been daring him to start taking a look at the Pentagon. Bannon knows that’s where this all falls apart. The military has been suspiciously quiet about this direct threat to national security, and there’s no telling how the spies feel. Given how much of the government Musk has taken over, an anti-Musk junta isn’t beyond the pale — and while Musk presumably has private security, there are a lot more people in, say, the Army.
This strikes me as an all-or-nothing action for Musk. If he wins, he rules the most powerful nation on Earth. If he loses, he’s going to have legal headaches for the rest of his life, maybe even the sort that land him in jail. X continues to hemorrhage money, Tesla’s declining sales catch up with the company, and maybe worst for him, he’s publicly humiliated — having gone from King Musk to nothing at all. I expect him to fight tooth and nail to hold on to the power he’s grabbed. The question is if he’ll have to.
Technology
Sony’s Xperia 1 VIII is still a phone for the fans
The Xperia 1 VIII marks an attempt at a step change for Sony’s flagship phone line. Not only has it had an aesthetic overhaul, but Sony has also revamped the camera system, dropping the continuous optical zoom telephoto that’s defined the last four generations of Xperia phone.
It’s not all different. Sony staples like a 3.5mm headphone jack and microSD card slot remain, and a few specific design touches, like a thick front bezel that fits stereo speakers, have stayed intact. Sony’s ambitious pricing hasn’t changed either: The Xperia 1 VIII isn’t launching in the US, but in the UK and Europe, it starts from £1,399 / €1,499 (about $1,850), rising to £1,849 / €1,999 ($2,450) if you want 1TB of storage.
For Sony diehards, this delivers the flagship essentials, including a capable camera, and looks good doing it. For everyone else, you can find better Android phones at this price, like Xiaomi’s 17 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra.

$1850
The Good
- Stark, striking design
- Headphone jack and microSD card slot
- Capable cameras
The Bad
- Middling battery life
- Uneven performance
- Only four years of Android updates
- Dreadful AI Camera Assistant
Sony’s Xperia 1 phones have looked almost identical to one another since 2020. It was a pretty handsome design, to be fair, but probably overdue sprucing up. The 1 VIII does just that, moving to a blocky new camera island and an unusual textured finish that make the phone feel very different to every previous Xperia.
I’m a big fan of the design, which has a stark, brutalist quality. The slightly grippy texture — a bit like an incredibly fine nail file — was designed to vary subtly between the back and frame, which helps prevent the phone from feeling like a monotone slab. The texture helps sell the phone’s high price even better than ultrasmooth glass might (not that this isn’t glass, with Gorilla Glass Victus on the rear and Victus 2 on the front).




I love the details, like how the camera island’s edges drop off steeply on three sides, while on the last it angles down to meet the frame. Sony’s usual knurled two-stage camera shutter button returns, adding another textural element and improved camera controls. Unfortunately, so does the recessed power button and fingerprint sensor, which is less reliable than modern under-display options. It fails about a third of the time I try it. I’m also confused by the odd rectangular patch above the volume button, which has an especially rough texture and looks like it should do something, but doesn’t. Is it some sort of antenna cutout? I’ve asked Sony.
Sony long ago gave up on using its unique 21:9, 4K displays on the Xperia lineup. The 1 VIII uses a less impressive 1080p display in a standard smartphone aspect ratio. The resolution is low for this grade of phone, but otherwise I can’t complain about the panel, which is a 6.5-inch, 120Hz OLED with decent brightness. I do still miss the taller screens Sony phones used to offer, though. Unlike most rivals, the display is also entirely uninterrupted by a camera cutout, notch, or Dynamic Island. The tradeoff is the rather thick bezel above and below the screen, which houses the camera and a pair of stereo speakers (good for phone speakers, but still phone speakers).

The Xperia 1 VIII’s internals are unremarkable, with the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset you’ll find on most comparable handsets. It’s paired with either 12GB of RAM and 256GB of storage — available in black, red, or silver versions of the phone — or 16GB of RAM and 1TB of storage. That model is only available in gold, meaning that anyone tempted by the Trump phone’s lustrous finish and built-in headphone jack can enjoy the same luxuries here for quadruple the price.
What is remarkable is that Sony has managed to make the 8 Elite Gen 5 perform quite poorly. While the phone runs smoothly the majority of the time, I’ve run into repeated stuttering and slowdowns, especially in the camera or while switching between apps. It gets hot, too. Using the phone to record the audio of a recent press event, with real-time AI transcription running, it became worryingly warm after just 30 minutes or so, and as the hourlong call ended, it was hot to the touch.
I don’t love the battery either. Sony claims you’ll get two days of life out of the 5,000mAh cell, but I don’t see how. I’m a light-to-moderate user most of the time, and I’ve dipped into single-digit territory by bedtime more than once. This will last the day unless you push it hard, but expect to charge every 24 hours. That might take some time too, given the 30W max speed, substantially slower than most rivals. Only Google’s Pixel 10 Pro charges quite so slowly.

This is definitely Sony’s best phone camera yet
I have better news on the camera front. After years of carving its own path, Sony has taken the “if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em” approach to its Chinese flagship rivals, abandoning its clever continuous zoom lens and instead packing the 1 VIII with the biggest telephoto sensor it could fit. That Sony dropped continuous zoom in the same year Xiaomi finally copied it and did it better feels like a cruel twist of fate.
Still, what the 2.9x (70mm-equivalent) telephoto lens here loses in versatility by giving up continuous zoom it more than makes up for in quality. That’s driven mostly by the move to a large 48-megapixel, 1/1.56-inch-type sensor — the same size as the ultrawide’s and almost as big as the 1/1.35-inch-type main camera sensor. Those other cameras, along with the 12-megapixel selfie shooter, are unchanged from last year.
1/19
The telephoto and the ultrawide are the two standouts, both using relatively large sensors compared to the competition. I’m a fan of Sony’s daytime processing, which leans toward higher contrast and slightly more muted colors than some other phones, and nighttime shots come out sharp and well-exposed too, though still struggle with bright streetlights. This is definitely Sony’s best phone camera yet and holds its own against the competition.

That is, except for the egregious new AI Camera Assistant. More often than not, when you’re trying to take a shot with the rear camera (not selfies — don’t ask me why), a pop-up appears with four AI-suggested edits to your photos, before you even take them. The overwhelming majority of these are simply overaggressive filters, either ramping up contrast or dialling back saturation, often to comically bad effect. Occasionally one will include algorithmically generated bokeh, and Sony claims it can also suggest lens swaps for better framing, but this has yet to happen to me. Every single suggestion has been markedly worse than the default camera settings, and the pop-up alone is a distracting annoyance that seems to make the camera app sluggish. Fortunately, you can turn it off, and if I wasn’t reviewing the phone, I would have done so immediately.
1/5
The AI camera suggestions feel emblematic of Sony’s Xperia line, which always delivers an impressive amount on paper and then contrives to trip itself up. The headphone jack, expandable storage, and stereo speakers are great. The new design language is striking and unique. The camera is the best it’s ever been. Sony’s relatively simple, streamlined take on Android 16 has its appeal too, but a meager promise of four OS updates and six years of security support gives me pause. It has its irritating quirks too: it keeps insisting on creating home screen folders, adding Facebook to my Instagram icon to make a Meta folder, and throwing a whole host of Google apps on top of Google Maps. Throw in the middling battery, performance problems, and high price, and the 1 VIII is hard to recommend to the average flagship buyer.
All of which leaves Sony back where it started. It redesigned the Xperia, rethought its camera, and simplified its software, but this is still what it always was: a phone for the fanboys. The rest of us can do better.
Photography by Dominic Preston / The Verge
Agree to Continue: Sony Xperia 1 VIII
Every smart device now requires you to agree to a series of terms and conditions before you can use it — contracts that no one actually reads. It’s impossible for us to read and analyze every single one of these agreements. But we started counting exactly how many times you have to hit “agree” to use devices when we review them since these are agreements most people don’t read and definitely can’t negotiate.
To use the Xperia 1 VIII, you must agree to:
- Google Terms of Service
- Google Play Terms of Service
- Google Privacy Policy (included in ToS)
- Install apps and updates: “You agree this device may also automatically download and install updates and apps from Google, your operator, and your device’s manufacturer, possibly using cellular data.”
- Sony warranty and usage guidelines
- Sony end user licence agreement
There’s also a variety of optional agreements, including:
- Provide anonymous location data for Google’s services
- “Allow apps and services to scan for Wi-Fi networks and nearby devices at any time, even when Wi-Fi or Bluetooth is off.”
- Google phone number verification
- Send usage and diagnostic data to Google
- Let contacts nearby find and share with you
- Google Gemini Apps Privacy Notice if you opt in to using Gemini Assistant
- Sony data collection to develop and improve products and services
- Sony data use for tailored marketing
- Sony data use for tailored support
- Sony data use for tailored marketing via the support app
Honor includes several more optional agreements during setup tied to specific features. Other Google features, like Google Wallet, may require additional agreements.
Final tally: six mandatory agreements and more than 12 optional agreements.
Technology
Meta offers paid training for AI data center jobs
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
AI may feel like something that lives inside your phone or computer. But behind every chatbot, smart assistant and AI image generator sits a massive physical network. Those systems need buildings. They need power. They need fiber lines, cooling equipment and crews who know how to build safely.
That is where Meta’s new America’s Workforce Academy comes in.
Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, says it will invest $115 million in the program’s first year to train people for skilled trade jobs tied to AI infrastructure. The pitch is easy to understand. You do not need prior experience. Meta says qualified participants can get tuition, airfare, lodging and a daily stipend covered during training. The program also promises a job offer for graduates.
For someone looking for a new career, that could be a big deal. Still, there is a bigger question behind all of this. As Big Tech races to build more AI data centers, communities across the country are asking what these projects will mean for their electric bills, water supply and quality of life.
THE AI REVOLUTION THREATENS OFFICE JOBS, BUT REVIVES DEMAND FOR SKILLED TRADES
Meta’s America’s Workforce Academy aims to train workers for skilled trade jobs tied to the growing AI data center boom. (Meta)
Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
- Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
- For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com – trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
- Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.
What is Meta’s America’s Workforce Academy?
America’s Workforce Academy is a new training program from Meta aimed at preparing people for skilled trade jobs connected to AI data center construction. The 2026 pilot locations are in Louisiana, Ohio, Indiana and Texas. Meta says the program is open to qualified veterans, recent graduates, career changers and other people entering the trades from across the country.
The training focuses on jobs needed to build AI infrastructure. That includes fiber technicians, electricians, welders, plumbers, mechanics and other construction roles. Meta is working with the National Urban League, Associated Builders and Contractors, CBRE and several community partners. The company says the goal is to create a faster path into trade careers without the burden of tuition or college debt.
Why Meta needs skilled trade workers
AI may sound digital, but the buildout is very physical. Data centers require construction crews, electrical systems, cooling equipment, backup power, security and high-speed network connections. None of that appears by magic.
Meta says its earlier Level-Up fiber training program drew 35,000 applications in the first seven days. That response showed the company two things: People want a path into these jobs, and the AI buildout needs more trained workers fast.
This is also a smart move for Meta. The company needs workers who can help build its infrastructure. At the same time, it gives Meta a stronger jobs message as data centers face more scrutiny from local communities.
WHY AMERICA NEEDS TO TAX-INCENTIVIZE TRADESMEN, NOT JUST COLLEGE GRADUATES
The job offer makes this program stand out
Many job training programs ask people to take a leap of faith. You pay for training, spend weeks or months learning and hope someone hires you afterward. Meta’s program takes a different approach. The company says participants are paid while they train, and graduates receive a job offer.
That matters for people who cannot afford to pause their income or take on debt. A short training path with a clear job connection could help veterans, younger workers and career changers get into a stable field.
Even so, anyone interested should read the details carefully when applications open. You will want to know where the job is located, who the employer is, what the pay looks like and whether travel or relocation will be required. A guaranteed job sounds great. The details will tell you whether it fits your life.
AI COMES WITH A HEFTY CHARGE. ARE YOU THE ONE WHO GETS STUCK WITH THE BILL?
Why AI data centers are causing pushback
Data centers are now turning into neighborhood issues. Some residents worry about the amount of electricity these facilities use. Others worry about water, noise, traffic and whether local taxpayers end up supporting projects that mainly benefit large tech companies.
Those concerns are growing as demand for AI climbs. Data centers need huge amounts of power to run servers and cooling systems. In some areas, people fear that could put pressure on the local grid or contribute to higher utility costs.
Water can also become a flashpoint. Some facilities use water for cooling, which can raise concerns in communities already dealing with heat, drought or fast growth.
Supporters argue that data centers bring construction jobs, tax revenue and new investment. Critics want clearer answers before towns approve major projects.
Both sides have a point. Jobs matter. So do electric bills, local resources and transparency.
Why this Meta program comes at a sensitive time
Meta’s announcement arrives as the company and other tech giants pour billions into AI. At the same time, many workers are nervous about what AI means for their careers. The tech industry has already seen layoffs as companies shift resources toward automation and AI development. That makes this program feel both promising and complicated.
AI COULD DRIVE US UNEMPLOYMENT TO 20%, SENATORS WARN AS NEW BILL TARGETS JOB TRACKING
On one side, Meta is offering a real pathway into skilled trade work. On the other hand, the same AI boom creating these construction jobs is also raising fears about job losses elsewhere.
The lesson here is that AI will not affect every worker the same way. Some jobs may shrink. Others may grow because AI needs a physical backbone. For many people, the next tech job may involve a hard hat instead of a laptop.
How to avoid scams tied to AI job programs
A program with Meta’s name, paid training and job offers will attract attention from job seekers and scammers, so it helps to slow down and verify every step before you share personal information.
META FACES INCREASING SCRUTINY OVER WIDESPREAD SCAM ADS
The program offers paid training, travel support, lodging and a job offer for qualified graduates entering AI infrastructure work. (Meta)
Apply through official sources only
Only apply through official Meta or verified partner links. Be careful with random texts, social media messages or emails that push you to act fast. Don’t click links in unsolicited messages. Instead, go directly to Meta’s official website or the verified partner’s site yourself. Strong antivirus software can also help block malicious links, phishing pages and downloads before they put your device or personal information at risk. Get my picks for the best 2026 antivirus protection winners for your Windows, Mac, Android and iOS devices at Cyberguy.com
Watch for upfront payment requests
Watch for anyone asking you to pay an application fee, buy equipment upfront or share banking details before you verify the program. Meta says this training is funded by the company, so upfront payment requests should raise a red flag.
Limit what scammers can find about you
This is also a good time to limit how much of your personal information is floating around online. A data removal service can help reduce your exposure on people search sites and data broker lists, which scammers often use to target job seekers with more convincing messages. Check out my top picks for data removal services and get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web by visiting Cyberguy.com
SCAMS THAT AREN’T ILLEGAL (BUT SHOULD BE)
Save every job offer detail in writing
Also, save copies of anything you receive. Keep the offer terms, training location, pay information and job requirements in writing.
What this means to you
For someone looking for a new path, this could be a real opportunity. Paid training and a possible job at the end can change the equation for people who want skilled work but cannot afford to take a big financial risk just to get started.
For communities, the promise of jobs should come with real answers. A data center can bring investment, but it can also put pressure on local resources. People who live nearby deserve to know what they are giving up and what they are actually getting back.
This also changes the way we talk about AI and jobs. We hear so much about AI replacing people. But behind every AI tool is a massive physical system that still needs human hands and local communities to keep it running. That, to me, is the bigger story here.
Watch the CyberGuy Live replay: Lock down your phone in 30 minutes
Your phone holds your email, passwords, photos, banking apps and personal data. In this free CyberGuy Live replay, Kurt the CyberGuy walks you step by step through simple phone security fixes you can do at your own pace. You’ll learn how to improve your privacy settings, spot the latest phone scams, use trusted security tools and walk away with a simple checklist to stay protected. Watch the replay and get our checklist here: CyberGuyLive.com
Kurt’s key takeaways
Meta’s America’s Workforce Academy could become a meaningful opportunity for people who want a path into skilled trades without taking on college debt. The AI boom needs workers who can build the real-world systems behind the technology. That part often gets overlooked when everyone focuses on chatbots and chips. But communities still deserve answers. Data centers can affect power demand, water use and local infrastructure. A jobs program helps, but it cannot replace transparency. Meta now has a chance to prove that the AI boom can create opportunities beyond Silicon Valley. The real test will be whether workers and local communities both benefit.
Would you want an AI data center in your community if it brought paid training and jobs, or would concerns over power and water make you push back? Let us know in the comments below. Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com
Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report
As data centers expand across the country, communities are weighing new job opportunities against concerns over power, water and local impact. (Meta)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
- Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
- For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com – trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
- Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.
Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.
Technology
The Atlantic created a searchable database of the music used to train AI
Atlantic reporter Alex Reisner recently uncovered four datasets of music being used to train AI models and made them fully searchable for the public. Two of the sets are absolutely enormous at 12 million and 9 million tracks. The other two are much smaller, but still represent a significant amount of training data at over 100,000 songs each.
According to Reisner, the sets have been downloaded thousands of times and, while it’s impossible to know exactly who has used them, Google and Stability have both confirmed they have in research papers. Some of the sources, like the Free Music Archive dataset, are free to stream for personal use but require licensing for commercial applications.
While the datasets are freely available on the internet in theory, using them as training data is not as simple as downloading a ZIP file and feeding it to an AI model. As Reisner explains:
Three of the datasets I found are distributed as a list of links to songs on YouTube or Spotify. AI developers download the actual audio using tools that automate the job, some of which allow developers to bypass logins, advertisements, and mechanisms that might earn money or subscribers for creators. Such tools violate the terms of service of these platforms.
-
Los Angeles, Ca40 minutes ago31st annual Rodeo Drive Concours d’Elegance provides perfect Father’s Day activity
-
Detroit, MI58 minutes ago3 Isaiah Stewart Trade Packages That Would Make Sense for Detroit Pistons
-
San Francisco, CA1 hour agoGiants Reach Franchise Milestone Never Before Seen in San Francisco
-
Dallas, TX1 hour agoMavericks’ Potential 2026 NBA Draft Trade Down Target Revealed
-
Miami, FL1 hour agoCould the Heat bring Duncan Robinson back in a Deal for Giannis Antetokounmpo?
-
Boston, MA1 hour agoVolunteer rescuer seriously injured Friday helping unresponsive teenage hiker in NH – The Boston Globe
-
Denver, CO2 hours ago7 injured in 3 overnight crashes across Denver, police say
-
Seattle, WA2 hours agoKraken Acquire Panthers Wing Mackie Samoskevich | Seattle Kraken