Connect with us

Sports

Potential NFL salary-cap cuts for all 32 teams: From Cooper Kupp to Davante Adams and more

Published

on

Potential NFL salary-cap cuts for all 32 teams: From Cooper Kupp to Davante Adams and more

Not every NFL team is blessed with cap space this offseason. The New England Patriots, for example, have little worry and plenty incentive to spend at an estimated $119 million in cap space, according to Over The Cap. Other teams, such as the New Orleans Saints, with a $51 million hole to climb out of, have plenty of cap gymnastics ahead over the next few months.

But no matter where any team falls on the cap space spectrum, everyone could stand to create some room for themselves as free agency revs up. That’s where The Athletic’s NFL beat writers come in. Which players could be salary-cap casualties in the coming months? We have one for all 32 teams below.


Arizona Cardinals: Jalen Thompson, S

GM Monti Ossenfort has avoided big swings, which often frustrates the fan base. But it has put the Cardinals in a good place and positioned them to improve the roster. Per Over The Cap, Arizona ranks fourth in the NFL with $71.3 million in available cap space. There’s not an obvious potential cap casualty on the roster. Thompson is a possibility. He has started for most of his six seasons. He’s dependable. He’s also entering the final year of his contract. The Cardinals in December locked up safety Budda Baker. They drafted Dadrion Taylor-Demerson in the fourth round of last year’s draft. This might be the place. Releasing Thompson, 27 in July, would save Arizona nearly $6.6 million in cap space. — Doug Haller

Atlanta Falcons: David Onyemata, DT

Financially, it makes more sense to move on from fellow defensive tackle Grady Jarrett, but he seems untouchable in Atlanta even though he and Onyemata both will be 32 when the season begins. The Falcons would incur an $8.8 million dead-cap hit, but releasing Onyemata would save the same amount in total cap dollars, and while his play has been solid in the two years (seven sacks, 14 TFLs) since signing as a free agent in 2023, it hasn’t been stellar, and the Falcons need to get younger up front (releasing Jarrett would save $16 million on the cap and result in just $4.1 million in dead-cap hit). — Josh Kendall

Baltimore Ravens: Marcus Williams, S

This has been viewed as a formality since the free-agent acquisition from 2022 was benched and made a healthy scratch for the final seven games. Williams restructured his contract last month to make it easier for the Ravens to move on as both sides understand the need for a fresh start for the 28-year-old safety who will likely be a post-June 1 release. Veteran cornerback Arthur Maulet is another potential salary-cap casualty for the Ravens, whose cuts could go deeper than they’d like because of a tight cap situation. — Jeff Zrebiec

Advertisement

Buffalo Bills: Von Miller, Edge

The Bills don’t have many obvious cap casualty candidates this offseason, but they must do something about Miller’s contract. The now rotational pass rusher is entering his age-36 season, and carries the second-biggest cap hit on the team at $23.8 million. That’s an untenable situation, given his small role. If the Bills cut him, they would save $8.4 million on the 2025 salary cap. But because he’d still hold a $15.4 million dead cap hit if released, the Bills could negotiate a pay cut with Miller equal to or greater than how much they’d save on the cap to cut him. However, without a pay cut, Miller is likely to be released. — Joe Buscaglia


Buffalo Bills pass rusher Von Miller, who turns 36 in March, could be a salary-cap casualty this offseason. (Timothy T Ludwig / Getty Images)

Carolina Panthers: Miles Sanders, RB

The writing has been on the wall for Sanders since 2023 when Frank Reich and Duce Staley — Sanders’ two biggest supporters — were fired after 11 games. Sanders, who signed a four-year, $25.4 million deal that year, took on a reduced role behind Chuba Hubbard. Even with backup Jonathon Brooks likely sidelined for 2025 after a second ACL surgery, the Panthers can find cheaper options than the 27-year-old Sanders. The Panthers will create $5.23 million in cap space by cutting Sanders, who will always have his two-touchdown game at Atlanta in Week 18 when Hubbard and Brooks were out. — Joseph Person

Chicago Bears: Gerald Everett, TE

After signing a two-year, $12 million contract to be the pass-catching tight end to complement Cole Kmet, Everett fell into the Bears’ No. 2 tight end curse. He finished with only eight catches for 36 yards. With a $6.5 million cap hit in 2025 and only $1 million of dead cap if he’s cut, it’s hard to see Everett sticking around to be part of Ben Johnson’s offense. He’ll be 31 in June, and while the Bears’ coaches clearly struggled last year to incorporate the tight end position, Everett’s poor production and high cap charge are a bad combo. — Kevin Fishbain

Cincinnati Bengals: Sheldon Rankins, DT

Rankins is one of many veterans on the Bengals roster likely to be let go this offseason (OL Alex Cappa, DL Sam Hubbard, LB Germaine Pratt). He’s the most certain of the group. The 31-year-old disappointed when healthy this season, only managing one sack and four pressures, then missed the second half of the year with an illness. Cincinnati gave Rankins a two-year, $24.5 million deal last year but will save $9.6 million against the cap. He has a roster bonus due March 17 that he will not see. — Paul Dehner Jr.

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Watch: What would a perfect offseason look like for the Bengals?

Advertisement

Cleveland Browns: Ogbo Okoronkwo, Edge

The Browns face a series of important salary cap-related decisions, and they could save $3 million by designating Okoronkwo as a post-June 1 cut ahead of his age-30 season. They also need to make difficult decisions on the future of veteran defensive tackles Dalvin Tomlinson and Shelby Harris — while also dealing with Myles Garrett’s trade request. It’s not been a fun few months for the Browns in just about any capacity. — Zac Jackson

Dallas Cowboys: Donovan Wilson, S

It’s more likely that Wilson remains on the team, but if there was going to be a salary-cap cut in Dallas, the safety position stands out. Wilson’s 2025 base salary is $6.5 million. Cutting him would leave $3.3 million in dead money. Wilson started every game last season, finishing third on the team in tackles and fifth in sacks. He ranked 61st among all safeties on Pro Football Focus.

The other option would be safety Malik Hooker, who also started every game last season. Hooker, who finished fourth in tackles and tied for the team lead with two interceptions, has a base salary of $5.5 million in 2025 and $6.5 million in 2026. Cutting him would leave Dallas with $4 million in dead money. Hooker finished 41st among all safeties, according to PFF. There is also a slight age difference. Wilson turns 30 this month. Hooker turns 29 in April. Again, the Cowboys will probably keep both, but the two starting safeties would be candidates if a cut had to happen. — Jon Machota

Denver Broncos: Alex Singleton, LB

This won’t be the same seismic offseason for the Broncos as in 2024, when they traded wide receiver Jerry Jeudy and cut safety Justin Simmons. Those moves were made, at least in part, to account for the financial ramifications of cutting quarterback Russell Wilson. The Broncos are operating with more than $50 million cap space and won’t be forced into cost-saving moves.

Still, the Broncos may take a look at Singleton’s contract as they reshape the inside linebacker room. The 32-year-old is coming off an ACL injury he suffered early last season and has no guaranteed money remaining on the three-year contract he signed in 2023. The Broncos would save $5.6 million by releasing him, according to Over The Cap, with only $1.3 million in dead money left behind. Safety P.J. Locke ($4.2 million savings if released) is another candidate to watch. — Nick Kosmider

Advertisement

Detroit Lions: Za’Darius Smith, Edge

It’s certainly possible Smith finds his way back to Detroit next season, but it’s hard to see it happening on the contract Detroit inherited via last year’s trade with Cleveland. Cutting Smith prior to June 1 would give the Lions nearly $6 million in cap savings without any dead-money penalties. Smith, 32, was a perfect fit with Detroit down the stretch last season and was the team’s best pass rusher after Aidan Hutchinson’s injury. Even if Smith is cut, look for Detroit to explore bringing him back on a new deal. — Nick Baumgardner

Green Bay Packers: Jaire Alexander, CB

Alexander has played in only seven games each of the last two regular seasons because of four separate injuries. There may be a disconnect off the field that hasn’t become public, too, despite general manager Brian Gutekunst saying otherwise. Cutting or trading the two-time second-team All-Pro before June 1 would free up about $6.8 million in cap space. Alexander has the third-highest cap number on the team for 2025 behind quarterback Jordan Love and defensive end Rashan Gary. That may not be worth it for how little he’s been available and whatever else might be going on with the 28-year-old. — Matt Schneidman

Houston Texans: Denico Autry, DT

Autry never lived up to the expectations the Texans had for him when he inked a two-year, $20 million deal last season. Autry, 34, wound up starting just two of the 10 games he appeared in and had 13 tackles and three sacks. Cutting him with a post-June 1 designation would translate into a savings of $9 million for the Texans, who are projected to have just more than $3 million in cap space entering the 2025 league year. — Mike Jones

Indianapolis Colts: Braden Smith, RT

Smith, who is entering the final year of a four-year, $70 million contract extension, missed the last five games of the season due to an undisclosed personal matter. Obviously, we can empathize with whatever kept Smith, known for playing through injuries, away from the field. From a football and financial standpoint, however, the writing has been on the wall for Indy to cut ties with him this offseason, even if he had played in every game in 2024. Doing so would save the Colts $16.75 million against the cap with only a $3 million dead cap hit. His salary is not tenable for a player who, aside from the 2024 season, missed seven games in 2023 due to wrist, foot, hip and knee injuries. The 28-year-old is likely past his prime, and it may behoove the Colts to go with 2024 draft pick Matt Goncalves at RT and spend the savings elsewhere. — James Boyd

Jacksonville Jaguars: WR Christian Kirk

The Jaguars don’t have a lot of options to easily free up chunks of cap space. They could certainly part with a handful of depth players, including wide receiver Josh Reynolds, to save $4 million, but the big moves would come down to Kirk and tight end Evan Engram. Cutting Kirk would save $10.4 million in cap space if the Jags need to make a splash move. His production has declined each of the past two seasons due to injuries. They also could free up $6 million in cap space by parting with Engram, which might be more of a consideration after the draft if the Jaguars tap into the talent at that position. — Jeff Howe

Advertisement

Kansas City Chiefs: Skyy Moore, WR

The Chiefs don’t have an ideal candidate for this category. This offseason will likely be similar to the past two years for the Chiefs. They can create plenty of salary-cap space by converting a large chunk of Mahomes’ $32.3 million roster bonus into a signing bonus. Another way to create a small amount of space is by releasing Moore, the 2022 second-round pick. Moore has struggled in the past three years and hasn’t done enough to have a defined role in the offense. The Chiefs would save $1.6 million by releasing him, according to Over The Cap, with just $467,819 in dead money. — Nate Taylor

Las Vegas Raiders: Gardner Minshew, QB

Minshew was terrible in 10 appearances last season and won’t be in the Raiders’ plans at quarterback. If they cut him straight up, they’ll free just $3 million in cap space while taking a dead money hit of $10.82 million, according to Spotrac. If they cut him with a post-June 1 designation, however, they’ll free up $6 million in cap space. The dead money hit would be spread across the next two seasons, with $7.82 million coming in 2025 and $3 million hitting the books in 2026. — Tashan Reed

Los Angeles Chargers: Joey Bosa, Edge

Bosa has a $36.47 million cap hit for 2025, according to Over The Cap. That is the highest cap hit for any edge rusher in the league this year. Bosa has not been close to that level of player in quite some time, largely due to injury. He has only played in 28 of a possible 51 regular-season games over the past three seasons. He has 14 combined sacks in that span. The Chargers do have cap flexibility this offseason. They have the sixth-most effective cap space in the league. But even with that space, keeping Bosa at this number just does not make sense. The Chargers can save $25.36 million in space by cutting or trading Bosa. — Daniel Popper

Los Angeles Rams: Cooper Kupp, WR

If the Rams can’t trade Kupp, they could cut him. His salary in 2025 is tricky. Cutting Kupp prior to June 1 would incur $22.26 million in dead money, while only saving $7.5 million. His roster bonus of $7.5 million is due March 17. Cutting Kupp after June 1 would incur $14.8 million in dead money while saving $15 million, but the team has made it clear it is ready to move on. The Rams did not ask Kupp to restructure his existing contract, a league source said, although they probably would be willing to eat some of the money owed to him to actually get a trade done. — Jourdan Rodrigue

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

Cooper Kupp trade proposals: 9 teams that could make a play for Rams receiver

Advertisement

Miami Dolphins: Jason Sanders, K

The Dolphins’ salary cap is in rough shape, and unfortunately for them, they don’t have many easy outs to free up space. For the biggest impact, they may wind up restructuring or extending contracts for big-money players such as LT Terron Armstead and LB Bradley Chubb — cutting them would incur huge dead-cap hits ($32.7 million for Armstead and $27.3 million for Chubb) — and push more of their money into the future.

Miami found some relief by cutting a few low-cost veterans in RB Raheem Mostert, CB Kendall Fuller and TE Durham Smythe last week. That, however, doesn’t leave many palatable options left. Sanders is a good kicker and fairly compensated with a cap hit of $4.7 million in 2025. But the Dolphins need cap space, and cutting him would save $3.3 million. — Jim Ayello

Minnesota Vikings: Ed Ingram, G

The Vikings benched Ingram in Week 11 after three seasons as a starter at right guard. A second-round pick in 2022, Ingram struggled in pass protection for the third straight season. Minnesota’s offseason will revolve around revamping the trenches. Ingram is not a viable option if the Vikings are committed to vastly improved play. Cutting him makes sense.

The Vikings could save a minimum of about $3.3 million on the cap with the move. That number could actually increase, depending on whether Ingram receives a proven performance escalator. Minnesota already has close to $60 million in cap space for 2025, so this move is not a necessity. That said, the Vikings need to upgrade their interior offensive line, interior defensive line, cornerback and running back. More money to spend will help. — Alec Lewis

New England Patriots: Kendrick Bourne, WR

It might seem crazy for the Patriots to cut arguably their top player at arguably their biggest position of need, but they could yield $4.9 million in cap savings by cutting Bourne before June 1 (or $6.3 million if they do it with a post-June 1 designation). Bourne missed the start of last season while recovering from a torn ACL and posted 305 receiving yards in 12 games. As he enters his age-30 season, it might be time for the Pats to move on. — Chad Graff

Advertisement

New Orleans Saints: Derek Carr, QB

Carr is the most obvious candidate as the Kellen Moore era begins in New Orleans. During his introductory news conference, Moore was noncommittal about the quarterback’s future with the team. Cutting Carr would add more dead money to the Saints’ league leading total, according to Spotrac.com, but the franchise has a lot of those contracts coming off the books in 2026, which would provide some relief. Even if the Saints stick with Carr, they’ll likely need to restructure his deal as they are roughly $51 million over the projected salary cap in 2025. — Amos Morale III


The New Orleans Saints, who have the league’s worst cap situation, might opt to release Derek Carr this offseason. (Julio Aguilar / Getty Images)

New York Giants: Graham Gano, K

The Giants don’t have any albatross contracts to shed this offseason and they’re in a healthy enough cap situation that they don’t need to make any cap cuts. Still, a $5.7 million cap hit is excessive for the 37-year-old Gano, who has missed 16 games due to injury the past two seasons. The Giants can create $3.2 million in cap savings while eating $2.5 million in dead money by dumping Gano. That’s not an overwhelming financial impetus, but a team in the Giants’ position can allocate that money better. — Dan Duggan

New York Jets: Davante Adams, WR

Now that we know Aaron Rodgers will not be returning (he’ll also likely be cut and designated post-June 1), don’t expect his two running mates — Adams and Allen Lazard — to return either. Adams played well for the Jets but he only came to New York to play with his friend. His contract is mostly non-guaranteed, so cutting or trading him would save $29.8 million in cap space with an $8.3 million dead-cap charge. The Jets don’t have a lot of cap casualty options outside of the two former Packers receivers. — Zack Rosenblatt

Philadelphia Eagles: Darius Slay, CB

The Eagles began their succession plan at cornerback last year by spending their first two draft picks on Quinyon Mitchell and Cooper DeJean. Both were finalists for Defensive Rookie of the Year. Slay, 34, battled multiple injuries during the season. He missed one game with a knee injury, another with a groin injury and sat out the regular-season finale while resting the entire week. The six-time Pro Bowler is still playing well, and perhaps, like Jason Kelce, Fletcher Cox and Brandon Graham before him, Slay will be afforded some say in when it’s time for him to leave. But his cap hit is the sixth highest for an Eagles team that needs a little wiggle room, and a cut with a post-June 1 designation not only saves the Eagles $4.3 million in 2025, but also $17.7 million in 2026. — Brooks Kubena

Pittsburgh Steelers: Larry Ogunjobi, DT

Ogunjobi signed with the Steelers in 2022 after tallying double-digit TFLs and QB hits in three of his first five seasons. But during his three years in Pittsburgh, he’s only once reached double digits in any category (QB hits in 2022), while playing through numerous injuries. The Steelers, who are scheduled to employ the NFL’s highest-paid defense for the fourth consecutive year in 2025, can save $7 million of Ogunjobi’s $10 million cap hit by cutting him. While that would leave a hole on the defensive front, the Steelers can fill it with a younger, less-expensive option in the draft. Whether the Steelers make this move or not, expect them to target a defensive lineman early on draft weekend. — Mike DeFabo

Advertisement

San Francisco 49ers: Javon Hargrave, DT

General manager John Lynch already has said the 49ers will release Hargrave, who missed most of the 2024 season with a triceps tear, and allow him to become a free agent next month. Hargrave, 32, was the team’s big-splash free-agent signing in 2023 when he agreed to a four-year, $84 million deal. But he played only one full season in San Francisco before being injured in Week 3 this past season. Lynch said the 49ers would be interested in re-signing Hargrave, but it would have to be at the right price. Hargrave’s market will be interesting in a year in which the draft is believed to be deep at defensive tackle. — Matt Barrows

Seattle Seahawks: Dre’Mont Jones, LB

Jones signed a three-year, $51 million deal in March 2023, the richest external free-agent deal of the John Schneider era by average annual salary. The contract was restructured last season, increasing Jones’ 2025 cap hit to $25.6 million. Seattle saves $11.5 million by trading or releasing Jones, who might be the team’s fifth-best pass rusher when everyone is healthy. Jones is only 28 and a decent pass rusher, but his current cap figure appears to be untenable. Also, Seattle would save $17 million by trading or releasing Tyler Lockett, who turns 33 in September. — Michael-Shawn Dugar

Tampa Bay Buccaneers: Jamel Dean, CB

Dean’s cap hit in 2025 of $15.2 million ranks eighth highest among NFL cornerbacks. And the Bucs, who reportedly have $11.7 million in cap space, will be looking for ways to trim. Dean is a solid player but he will be 29 in October and never has been a big-play producer or shutdown corner. Over the past two years, he has missed nine games and parts of five others with injuries. Cutting Dean would leave the Bucs thin at cornerback, however. — Dan Pompei

Tennessee Titans: Treylon Burks, WR

The designated replacement for AJ Brown, the other side of one of the worst personnel moves in franchise history and one of the worst in recent NFL memory, needs a fresh start. And the Titans need to stop waiting for him to be a factor. The 2022 first-round pick has been banged up, playing in 27 of 51 possible games. He hasn’t done much with his opportunities — 53 catches for 699 yards and one touchdown. His 2025 cap hit and the dead number if the Titans move on from him are the same, $4.6 million. That’s worth moving on and rebuilding the receiving corps around Calvin Ridley. — Joe Rexrode

Washington Commanders: Jonathan Allen, DT

One season remains on Allen’s four-year, $72 million extension. The terms included a $22.47 million salary-cap hit but only a $6 million dead-cap charge. Washington has significant cap room regardless, but it also has DT Daron Payne counting north of $20 million and an Allen replacement in 2024 second-rounder Johnny Newton on the roster. Allen’s streak of healthy seasons ended with a pectoral tear, though he surprisingly returned before the playoff run. His power and pass rushing would be missed. However, his sack totals have declined annually since recording nine in 2021, and he is entering his age 30-season. — Ben Standig

Advertisement

(Top photos of Cooper Kupp and Davante Adams: Brooke Sutton and Perry Knotts / Getty Images)

Sports

ESPN analyst Paul Finebaum questions Trump’s college sports reform meeting as potential ‘circus’

Published

on

ESPN analyst Paul Finebaum questions Trump’s college sports reform meeting as potential ‘circus’

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump will host a White House roundtable regarding college athletics reform later this week.

The panel is expected to include prominent coaches, college sports and pro sports league commissioners, and other professional athletes, according to OutKick.

The group will meet March 6 to examine solutions to key challenges, including NCAA authority; name, image and likeness issues (NIL); collective bargaining; and governance concerns. 

 

Advertisement

President Donald Trump holds a football presented to him during a ceremony to present the Commander-in-Chief’s Trophy to the US Naval Academy football team, the Navy Midshipmen, in the East Room of the White House on April 15, 2025 in Washington, D.C. (BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images)

The meeting Friday will include big names like Nick Saban, Urban Meyer, Adam Silver and Tiger Woods. Trump has been adamant about “saving college sports,” even signing an executive order setting new restrictions on payments to college athletes back in July.

However, ESPN college analyst Paul Finebaum, who has previously hinted at a congressional run as a Republican, remains a bit skeptical.

“The easiest thing, guys, is just to say this is ridiculous,” Finebaum said to Greg McElroy and Cole Cubelic on WJOX. “And I read the other day, ‘Why is Nick Saban going?’ Why is anybody going? The bottom line is this. If something doesn’t happen very quickly, and I mean in the next short period of time, we’re talking about weeks, not years, then this thing could blow up.

“However it came about, I’m in favor of. The question now becomes, with some of the most powerful people in Washington in the same room, including the most powerful person in the country, can anything get done, or will it be a circus? Will it be just another show?”

Advertisement

U.S. President Donald Trump shakes hands with former Alabama Crimson Tide football coach Nick Saban as Trump takes the stage to address graduating students at Coleman Coliseum at the University of Alabama on May 01, 2025 in Tuscaloosa, Alabama. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Trump’s order prohibits athletes from receiving pay-to-play payments from third-party sources. However, the order did not impose any restrictions on NIL payments to college athletes by third-party sources.

A House vote on the SCORE Act (Student Compensation and Opportunity through Rights and Endorsements), which would regulate name, image, and likeness deals, was canceled shortly before it was set to be brought to the floor in December.

The White House endorsed the act, but three Republicans, Byron Donalds, Fla., Scott Perry, Pa., and Chip Roy, Texas, voted with Democrats not to bring the act to the floor. Democrats have largely opposed the bill, urging members of the House to vote “no.”

President Donald Trump looks on before the college football game between the US Army and Navy at the M&T Bank Stadium in Baltimore, Maryland, on Dec. 13, 2025.  (Alex WROBLEWSKI / AFP via Getty Images)

Advertisement

The SCORE Act would give the NCAA a limited antitrust exemption in hopes of protecting the NCAA from potential lawsuits over eligibility rules and would prohibit athletes from becoming employees of their schools. It prohibits schools from using student fees to fund NIL payments.

Fox News’ Chantz Martin and Ryan Gaydos contributed to this report.

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter

Advertisement

Related Article

GOP senator calls for revision to federal law as sports fans pay big on outrageous streaming prices

Continue Reading

Sports

Lakers hope comeback win over Pelicans gives the team a timely boost

Published

on

Lakers hope comeback win over Pelicans gives the team a timely boost
p]:text-cms-story-body-color-text clearfix”>

Lakers center Jaxson Hayes falls after Pelicans forward Zion Williamson commits an offensive foul as Lakers guard Austin Reaves watches at at Crypto.com Arena on Tuesday.

(Allen J. Schaben/Los Angeles Times)

Matching the physicality of Pelicans forwards Zion Williamson and Saddiq Bey was on the top of the Lakers’ scouting report. But the task is easier said than done.

Advertisement

Reaves admitted to being “terrified” of stepping in front of a driving Williamson to draw a charge. The 6-foot-6, 284-pound Pelicans forward is just as physical as he is athletic, creating a fearsome combination for defenders. Healthy for the first time in two seasons, Williamson led the Pelicans with 24 points on 10-for-18 shooting.

“We haven’t seen somebody like that in a long time, right?” Smart said. “[With] his ability. But [being] willing to put your body there, take a charge, take an elbow to the face, box him out, go vertical, is definitely something that you got to be willing to do, and not everybody’s willing to do it. And that’s the difference in the game.”

Center Jaxson Hayes was up to the task. He absorbed a Williamson elbow in the fourth quarter and ended up in the front row of the stands holding his jaw. But the knock was worth it for the offensive foul that helped maintain the Lakers’ 14-0 run that quickly erased the Pelicans’ eight-point lead. The scoring streak started immediately after Hayes subbed back into the game with 7:20 remaining after he scored on his first possession, cutting to the basket for a dunk off an assist from Doncic.

Hayes had eight points, six rebounds and two blocks, playing nearly 23 minutes off the bench in his biggest workload as a substitute since Jan. 20 against Denver. After playing with Hayes in New Orleans during the center’s first two years in the league, Redick lauded the seven-year pro’s improvement. Hayes is sinking touch shots around the rim now. He has improved his decision making in the pocket. After getting benched for his defensive lapses last season, Hayes has impressed coaches with his consistent ability to stay vertical while protecting the rim. And he still brings the same trademark athleticism that made him the eighth overall pick in 2019.

“He consistently injects energy into the group when he runs the floor, blocks a shot, or he gets those dunks,” Redick said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Eileen Gu reflects on decision to leave Team USA for China: ‘A lot of people just don’t understand’

Published

on

Eileen Gu reflects on decision to leave Team USA for China: ‘A lot of people just don’t understand’

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Eileen Gu released a statement on social media Monday, reflecting on her controversial decision to compete for Team China despite being born and raised in the U.S. 

Gu’s statement tied the decision back to her passion for promoting women’s sports, and encouraging young girls to pursue sports. 

“I gave my first speech on women in sports and title IX when I was 11 years old. I talked about being the only girl on my ski team, and, despite attending an all-girls’ school from Monday through Friday, becoming best friends with my teammates on the weekends through the common language of sport,” Gu wrote on Instagram. 

Advertisement

Silver medalist Eileen Gu of China poses for photos after the awarding ceremony of the freestyle skiing women’s freeski big air event at the Milan-Cortina 2026 Olympic Winter Games in Livigno, Italy, Feb. 16, 2026. (Photo by Wang Peng/Xinhua via Getty Images) (Wang Peng/Xinhua via Getty Images)

“At the same time, I was made painfully aware of the lack of representation – at age 9, I felt that I was somehow representing all women every time I stepped in the terrain park. Landing tricks was about more than progression … it was about disproving the derisive implication of what it meant to ‘ski like a girl.’”

Gu went on to express gratitude for the one season in which she did compete for the U.S. 

“When I was 15, I announced my decision to compete for China. At the time, I had spent one season on the US team, and had been lucky enough to meet my heroes in person. I am forever grateful for that season, and continue to maintain a close relationship with the team. I had spent every summer in China since I was 8 setting up summer camps on trampoline and dry slope for kids and adults, ranging from 7 to 47 years old, so I knew the industry was tiny. I felt like I knew everyone,” she added. 

“Skiing for Team China meant the opportunity to uplift others through the universal culture of sport, and to introduce freeskiing to hundreds of millions of people who had never heard of it, especially with the Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics around the corner.”

Advertisement

Gu’s statement concluded by acknowledging that certain people “don’t understand” her decision to compete for China over the U.S., while insisting the choice maximized the impact she would have. 

“I can look back now, at 22, and tell 12 year old Eileen that there are now terrain parks full of little girls, who will never doubt their place in the sport. I can tell 15 year old me that there are now millions of girls who have started skiing since then, in China and worldwide,” Gu wrote. 

“A lot of people won’t understand or believe that I made a decision to create the greatest amount of positive impact on the world stage that I could, at this age, given my interests and passions. Three golds and six medals later, I can confidently say was once a dream is now a reality.”

Gu has become a target for global criticism this Olympics for her decision to represent China while remaining silent on the country’s alleged human rights abuses.

In an interview with Time magazine, Gu was asked her thoughts on China’s alleged persecution of Uyghurs and other Turkic Muslim minorities in Xinjiang. 

Advertisement

“I haven’t done the research. I don’t think it’s my business. I’m not going to make big claims on my social media,” Gu answered.

“I’m just more of a skeptic when it comes to data in general. … So, it’s not like I can read an article and be like, ‘Oh, well, this must be the truth.’ I need to have a ton of evidence. I need to maybe go to the place, maybe talk to 10 primary source people who are in a location and have experienced life there.

“Then I need to go see images. I need to listen to recordings. I need to think about how history affects it. Then I need to read books on how politics affects it. This is a lifelong search. It’s irresponsible to ask me to be the mouthpiece for any agenda.”

More controversy surrounding Gu erupted after The Wall Street Journal reported that Gu and another American-born athlete who now competes for China, were paid a combined $6.6 million by the Beijing Municipal Sports Bureau in 2025.

Gu is the highest-paid Winter Olympics athlete in the world, making an estimated $23 million in 2025 alone due to partnerships with Chinese companies, including the Bank of China and western companies. 

Advertisement

Her alignment with China prompted criticism from many Americans this Olympics, including Vice President J.D. Vance. 

“I certainly think that someone who grew up in the United States of America who benefited from our education system, from the freedoms and liberties that makes this country a great place, I would hope they want to compete with the United States of America,” Vance said in an interview on Fox News’ “The Story with Martha MacCallum.”

Later, when Gu was asked if she feels “like a bit of a punching bag for a certain strand of American politics at the moment,” she said she does. 

“I do,” she said. “So many athletes compete for a different country. … People only have a problem with me doing it because they kind of lump China into this monolithic entity, and they just hate China. So, it’s not really about what they think it’s about.

“And, also, because I win. Like, if I wasn’t doing well, I think that they probably wouldn’t care as much, and that’s OK for me. People are entitled to their opinions.”

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Silver medalist Eileen Gu of China attends the awarding ceremony of the freestyle skiing women’s freeski big air event at the Milan-Cortina 2026 Olympic Winter Games in Livigno, Italy, Feb. 16, 2026.  (Hongxiang/Xinhua via Getty Images)

Gu has claimed she was “physically assaulted” for the decision.  

“The police were called. I’ve had death threats. I’ve had my dorm robbed,” Gu told The Athletic

“I’ve gone through some things as a 22-year-old that I really think no one should ever have to endure, ever.”

Advertisement

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Related Article

Eileen Gu's interaction with reporter over winning silver instead of gold goes viral: ‘Ridiculous perspective’

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending