Connect with us

Sports

Martin Odegaard’s Real Madrid move revisited 10 years on – and why it didn’t work out

Published

on

Martin Odegaard’s Real Madrid move revisited 10 years on – and why it didn’t work out

Mop-haired and dressed in jeans and a black-and-white striped sweater, 16-year-old Martin Odegaard looked like a student walking the streets of Madrid.

But this was no ordinary teenager.

Ten years ago today, Odegaard was in the Spanish capital to be presented as Real Madrid’s new £3.5million ($4.3m at the current exchange rate) signing, the club having beaten a host of European football’s other big beasts to buy one of world football’s brightest prospects from Stromsgodset in his homeland of Norway.

Flanked by Madrid’s communications director, he sat in silence for more than a minute as a cacophony of camera shutters clicked in front of him. Not entirely sure where to look, what to do with his hands or whether to wear the headphones he had been given for translation, a 15-minute press conference with the world’s media soon commenced.

He had not long been told about the event he was to attend. Once off the plane, there was no stop at a hotel for a briefing and no club tracksuit offered before he was taken to the Bernabeu, Madrid’s home stadium, and placed in a chair with a microphone in front of him.

Advertisement

Odegaard’s upbringing and temperament meant he was not overawed but it seems unthinkable today that more care would not be taken in preparing so young a player for such an experience.

Perhaps it was thought that ‘civilian’ clothes and scruffy hair would present him as a teenager with boyish potential, whereas a glossy makeover would risk hurriedly packaging the kid as Madrid’s next galactico-in-waiting.


Martin Odegaard prepares to speak to the media after signing for Real Madrid (Denis Doyle/Getty Images)

It was to be that very dilemma, of how to pace his ascent to stardom, which paralysed his six years as a Madrid player.

But how did such a talented player, who has proven he can excel at the elite level over the past three years as Arsenal captain, not do it at the club who invested so much into signing him to begin with?

Odegaard’s name had started to reverberate around European scouting circles in 2012, when he was just 13 years old but already training with Stromgodset’s first team. The secret was out and so the competition began with the red carpet rolled out by virtually every major club. His father said they received more than 30 official offers come the end of their tour.

Advertisement

“There was a meeting in my living room, with me, the Norway national team coach, Martin and his dad,” says Jan Aage Fjortoft, Norway’s team manager from 2014.

“We were discussing his options, which was like choosing between The Beatles, The Rolling Stones and Elvis Presley. I still have two lists: the four I thought he should choose between and the four I guessed he was thinking about.”

Bayern Munich, Real Madrid, Arsenal and Liverpool made the final shortlist.

Odegaard was a player rubber-stamped by Madrid’s renowned chief scout Juni Calafat and the club’s offer included the guarantee he would train with the first team. They were also the only one of the four contenders to have a B team, which was coached at that time by legendary former player Zinedine Zidane, who had made a point of introducing himself.

Odegaard chose Madrid and immediately entered into an unusual hybrid schedule. He trained with Carlo Ancelotti’s first team during the week, alongside Marcos Llorente and Borja Mayoral — two of the club’s other highly-rated young talents. It was only on the final session of the week that Odegaard would drop down to the Castilla (reserve) team, who compete in the third tier of Spanish football.

Advertisement

He did not get off to the best of starts.

“He made his debut against Amorebieta and played 45 minutes on a pitch that was all mud; the water was up to our ankles,” says former Castilla team-mate Jorge Franco Alviz, known as Burgui. “Zidane had to change (substitute) him at half-time and in the locker room Odegaard kept saying, ‘Disaster, disaster’. He touched the ball twice, I think.”

Odegaard started regularly for Zidane’s B team but only registered one goal and one assist in 11 appearances. The media attention and wonderkid tag did not always sit well with other players in the Castilla team who were watching those matches from the bench despite working hard in training all week.

The two heads of youth at Madrid, Paco de Gracia and Ramon Martinez, asked Burgui to help Odegaard adapt because the newcomer was so shy. He improved over time but tended to avoid large groups and preferred to socialise with just one or two team-mates instead.

Odegaard’s father Hans, now manager of Norwegian club Lillestrom, moved to Spain with his son and was given a job coaching Madrid’s under-11 team. Football Leaks later said Odegaard Sr’s contract was allegedly worth £2.7million, roughly 10 times what would normally be expected for that kind of job.

Advertisement

“His father was always with him. You would see him in the corridors, so he never really left him to be alone,” says Burgui.

“I tried to help him by putting him next to me at the locker in the dressing room, because I am very open. We trained together in the gym in the afternoons. Each Tuesday and Wednesday, we were together and that brought us closer. He was 16 and I was 21 but he was at Castilla level as he was so skilful. He had a spectacular last pass, as well as his ball striking. I had no doubt that he would get to where he is now.”

Top young talents still need an avenue to experience competitive games if they are not deemed ready for a club’s first team. Come the end of that first season, Ancelotti was still showing little interest in using Odegaard — he did not name him in a single squad until the league finale.

“I thought, ‘I don’t care if he comes or not, because he’s not going to play for me now’,” recalls Ancelotti in a chapter from his 2016 autobiography Quiet Leadership, about how he focuses on managing rather than the power dynamics at clubs.


Odegaard and Ancelotti at Madrid training in 2015 (Angel Martinez/Real Madrid via Getty Images)

“He could go on to be the best player in the world after I’m gone, but I’m not interested in the signing because it isn’t of importance to my job,” he continued.

Advertisement

“Of course, when he came, I treated him with the same respect I would give to any young player, but why would I want to be involved in his recruitment? He is being recruited for the future, for other managers after my time.”

Odegaard did become part of Ancelotti’s tenure, however, when he was introduced 58 minutes into a 7-3 home win over Getafe that late May afternoon, replacing reigning Ballon d’Or winner Cristiano Ronaldo.

It was a strange game to come into. There was a wild scoreline in Madrid’s last game of the season but a flat atmosphere due to it being a trophyless campaign for the club. He may have masterminded Madrid’s long-awaited 10th Champions League triumph a year earlier, but Ancelotti knew this failure meant these were likely his final minutes in charge.

Despite that, he acquiesced to the pressure applied by club president Florentino Perez to give Odegaard his debut.

“It is still vital to respect the vision of the owners,” said Ancelotti. “Perez was well known for his galacticos approach, where the biggest and most expensive superstars in world football are recruited, so players would arrive and depart who would not necessarily have been my choice, but it was my job to make the team work with whatever assets I was given.

Advertisement

“It is a waste of time and energy to fight against something that has already happened — you must manage it. After all, that is why we are called managers. If the president decides that, for a PR exercise, he needs the Norwegian boy to play three games with the first team, I will work out a way of doing that.”

Rafael Benitez took over that summer but was sacked midway through the following season and replaced with Zidane, who knew Odegaard’s game from his time coaching him in the Castilla team. Yet Odegaard did not play a single minute in 2015-16, and made it into only one matchday squad.

The midfield options at Madrid still included Casemiro, Toni Kroos, Mateo Kovacic, Luka Modric, Isco, James Rodriguez and Llorente, which meant Odegaard and Llorente had to get regular game time from somewhere.

“There was no directive (to play them),” says Luis Miguel Ramis, who moved up from coaching the under-19 squad to take over as Castilla head coach in January 2016. “They were very good kids, so it was normal for them to play. I only remember once, in a game in Castilla La Mancha, on a very bad pitch, that I took him (Odegaard) off at half-time. The boy was lost.

“What happened is that, because he was so young, he wasn’t yet able to keep up with the competitive pace of the first team or go at the same speed. With us, the league we were in meant a lot of defensive work. He was a boy who was used to looking forwards and when he came to us, we had to work to get him to start looking backwards, and it was a bit more difficult for him.”

Advertisement

While Odegaard was playing in the Spanish third division, he was also regularly starting for Norway’s national team. Norway were benefiting from a long-term investment in his talent, made at a very early age, as they sought to promote him and build a side around him.

“We were discussing whether we could nominate (pick) a 15-year-old, going back and forward,” says Fjortoft. “I said, ‘Is he among the best 18 players in Norway?’, and we all agreed. One of the reasons we took him in was that we felt it was a great idea for him and his family to use the expertise and knowledge in and around the national team.

“For him to come to the national team was a great way to escape everything. The coach, Per-Mathias Hogmo, was very supportive and saw that he had to build him, to understand what a valuable asset he will be for the future of Norwegian football. He was brilliant, as a lot of coaches don’t always speak with the players a lot as they have others who will do it but he was close to Martin.

“I remember the first game Martin played. He came on, and the players just started giving him the ball. There was an acceptance of him demanding the ball and demanding the next one even if he had lost it. The best players have that.”

In Madrid, Odegaard was viewed as a little introverted but a very good team-mate and a professional in terms of training. However, there was a sense he was caught between two camps and his development stalled.

Advertisement

“He trained very little with us, he was always with the first team,” says Castilla team-mate Burgui. “He told me he would like to train with us for two or three days, because there were times when the first team was resting or the workload was very low because they had played Champions League the previous night. Because of the language and not being in daily dynamics with us, when he came, he didn’t understand the exercises at all.”

Odegaard played 23 games in the Norwegian top division after making his debut aged 15 years and 118 days. He became his country’s youngest international four months later and had won nine caps by March 2016, when he was still only 17.

Although many on the outside world expected Odegaard to be part of the Madrid first team, there was a feeling shared internally by some staff that even the Castilla side was too quick a step to make.

“You could see he was different on a technical level, but he struggled with the language and the tactical patterns,” says a senior Madrid academy source, speaking on the condition of anonymity to protect relationships.

“With Jose Gil (assistant to Ramis), he didn’t connect very well. Jose used to give him a lot of stick. The kid didn’t cause any problems but they even asked for him to go to the Juvenil A (youth) team.

Advertisement

“I would have put him in Juvenil A and stimulated him with appearances with Castilla, little by little. He would have had more security and time. He was not like Rodrygo or Vinicius Junior years later, who arrived ready-made. He was very anarchic (in his play), but when he was training with the ball, he was a crazy thing. He had arrived from a culture based on the technical, and that weighed him down.”

With no first-team pathway emerging at Madrid, Odegaard joined Dutch side Heerenveen on loan in January 2017. He spent 18 months there and a further year on loan in the same country at Vitesse Arnhem, playing 82 times as he posted expected assist (xA) numbers which made him by far the most creative under-21 talent in any of Europe’s major leagues.

The lack of goals and assists, combined with the lower level of competition, skewed the success of his time in the Netherlands. Odegaard was out of sight and out of mind — a player who had become less relevant because he was not doing it at the very top level, as had been expected.

When he returned to Madrid in summer 2019, he was still not deemed ready to break through at senior level. Instead, he joined Real Sociedad on a season-long loan and established himself as La Liga-ready, helping the Basque club to a sixth-place finish and to win the Copa del Rey, starting and scoring the first goal in a 4-3 victory over his parent club in the Bernabeu in the quarter-finals.

Having settled at a team who were playing European football, the prospect of extending his stay in San Sebastian seemed like a sensible one. It looked like it might happen, too, until Madrid tempted Odegaard back aboard the mothership with the promise of the first-team role with them he had been seeking for five years.

Advertisement

“All I can say is that he was very happy here,” says a Real Sociedad source, speaking anonymously to protect relationships. “Only a call from Zidane telling him that he was counting on him and that he would be important at Madrid led him not to continue for a second year. Martin wanted to stay.”

Zidane’s style of football was less structured and gave way to more back-and-forth games rather than being a possession-dominant side every week. Isco and Marcelo were two victims of that, and there was a belief that it did not suit Odegaard either.

True to his word, Zidane started Odegaard in the first two league games of the season but he was taken off at half-time away to Real Betis in the second one with his team trailing, 2-1. Isco replaced him and Madrid turned it around to win, 3-2. Odegaard dropped out of the team and two muscle injuries meant he started just one more league game and two more Champions League matches.

By that December, Odegaard was 22 years old and had played just 489 minutes for Madrid in almost six years.

The loan to Arsenal for the rest of that season had the potential to be an unsettling experience, another new country with a different style of football and no knowledge of whether it would just be a stopover for six months.

Advertisement

Four years on, Odegaard has made 174 appearances for the north London club. It took him time to find his top level but in Mikel Arteta he found a manager who believed in him and has designed Arsenal’s right flank to maximise his strengths in small spaces.


Martin Odegaard has become a leader under Mikel Arteta at Arsenal (Eddie Keogh/Getty Images)

Odegaard has no regrets over his decision to join Madrid as he saw it as the best education in world football at the time. There were moments during the journey when he did not know whether he was coming or going but that series of loans made him stronger.

Entering so many different changing rooms with the weight of his name hanging over him is not easy but it has built leadership qualities in him and Arteta saw fit to give him the captain’s armband ahead of the 2022-23 season, having made the transfer permanent for an initial £30million the previous summer.

“People talk about players as if they are machines, but he is like any 16-year-old leaving home to go to college for the first time,” said Fjortoft. “When I was 16, I didn’t want to go to my grandparents’ house 30km (18 miles) away because I missed home. It is all down to the mind, the toughness.

“There were people who thought he could just walk into the Madrid team and be the best player, but thankfully he has always had a good team around him. There are not many wonderkids who turned their talent into the career he has got. A few. like Wayne Rooney (after he joined Manchester United aged 18), go: trophy, trophy, trophy. But Martin had to go down and then back up, which is amazing.

Advertisement

“Don’t underestimate him by the way he looks. He is one of the most consequence-thinking people I have met. He looks like a guy the Vikings would have said no to, as he is not tall or brutal enough, but I would take him on any ship.”

Arteta has chosen Odegaard to steer Arsenal and now the only — albeit most difficult — task they have left is to make the transition from challengers into winners.

Additional reporting: Mario Cortegana, Guillermo Rai and Dermot Corrigan

(Top photos: Getty Images; design: Dan Goldfarb)

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Sports

Caitlin Clark's coach calls out WNBA for 'egregious' officiating: 'The disrespect has been unbelievable'

Published

on

Caitlin Clark's coach calls out WNBA for 'egregious' officiating: 'The disrespect has been unbelievable'

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

After a controversial no-call during a play involving Caitlin Clark Saturday, Indiana Fever head coach Stephanie White lambasted WNBA referees for their officiating in Fever games this season. 

In a rant after the Fever’s 90-88 loss to the New York Liberty, White called the officiating “egregious.” 

New York’s Natasha Cloud made contact with Clark during the game’s final possession, but referees did not blow the whistle. 

“I thought she got fouled. I think it’s pretty egregious what’s been happening to us the last few games,” White said of Clark. “The disrespect right now for our team has been pretty unbelievable. So, it’s disappointing, you know, that it doens’t go both ways, or it hasn’t gone both ways.” 

Advertisement

Head coach Stephanie White, right, and Caitlin Clark (Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images)

White also acknowledged the league has a system in place for teams to communicate disagreements with referee decisions but questioned whether the system works. 

“There’s a system to making sure that we can send stuff in and communicate our grievances, so to speak. I don’t know if I have a feeling that the system works,” she said. 

INSIDE CAITLIN CLARK AND ANGEL REESE’S IMPACT ON MEN’S BASKETBALL

Advertisement
caitlin clark angry

Indiana Fever guard Caitlin Clark reacts to officiating Saturday, May 24, 2025, during a game against the New York Liberty at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis. The Liberty won, 90-88. (Grace Smith/IndyStar/USA Today Network via Imagn Images)

Clark declined to give her opinion on the referee’s call on the final play. 

“I don’t know. I have to go back and watch,” Clark said of the call. 

During the game, Clark immediately looked to the officials for a foul and quickly began to shout at them when she realized no foul call was forthcoming. Her teammate, Sophie Cunningham, also approached the refs to protest the lack of a whistle. 

Caitlin Clark with Stephanie White

Indiana Fever guard Caitlin Clark (22) with head coach Stephanie White during the third quarter against the Brazil National Team at Carver-Haweye Arena.  (Jeffrey Becker/Imagn Images)

A replay showed Cloud pushing her shoulder into Clark’s the moment the ball came loose. But the referees did not blow the whistle, and the game ended there. 

Advertisement

The Fever fell to 2-2 on the season and have been on the wrong end of a number of controversial decisions by officials in their first four games of the season. 

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

An inside look at the control center behind Honda's IndyCar racing effort

Published

on

An inside look at the control center behind Honda's IndyCar racing effort

At the top of a hill in a sprawling Santa Clarita industrial park in the shadow of Magic Mountain’s roller coasters, a significant chapter in the history of motorsports was written.

But the story isn’t finished yet.

From the outside, the building is nothing special. Behind its walls, however, Honda Racing Corporation has designed, tested and built the engines that have won 14 of the last 21 IndyCar championships and all five IndyCar races this season. In Sunday’s Indianapolis 500, a race Honda has won 15 times since 2004, four of the top six starters will have Honda engines, including two-time winner Takuma Sato, who qualified second.

It’s a level of dominance unmatched in IndyCar history — in a series Honda probably helped save.

A technician works on an engine at Honda Racing Corporation. All of Honda’s engines for North American racing series are built in Santa Clarita.

Advertisement

(Robert Hanashiro / For the Times)

Amid the open-wheel civil war between Championship Auto Racing Teams and the Indy Racing League, Honda was prepared to walk away. Robert Clarke, who started Honda Performance Development (before it was renamed HRC in 2024) and made it a cutting-edge research and development facility, convinced American Honda president Koichi Amemiya to supply engines to IRL teams in 2003 after Honda left CART in 2002.

“It just was not Honda’s image of what a race car should be. That’s why Honda initially didn’t want to be involved,” Clarke said. “In my discussion with the president it was ‘OK, we developed all these skills and know-how. Are we just going to give that up and just walk away?’ That’s crazy.

”We invested literally billions of dollars. And we’ve seen the success.”

Advertisement

Chevrolet and Toyota eventually did quit, leaving Honda as the only IndyCar engine manufacturer for six seasons. Amemiya then doubled down, funding Honda’s move to its 123,000-square-foot home while expanding its workforce to 250 from an original staff of fewer than 10.

Honda hasn’t looked in the rearview mirror since.

Clarke, 75, left Honda in 2008 though he’s still something of an executive emeritus, one who wears the brand on his sleeve and often refers to the company with the collective pronoun “we.”

Robert Clarke, left, speaks to IndyCar driver Dario Franchitti at Mid-Ohio Race Course in July 2007.

Robert Clarke, left, speaks to IndyCar driver Dario Franchitti at Mid-Ohio Race Course in July 2007.

(Jay LaPrete / Associated Press)

Advertisement

He was 10 when his father took him to his first race to watch a friend run in an amateur open-wheel event. When young Robert was invited into the garage and allowed to work on the car “I was hooked,” he said. “My bedroom walls were covered with pictures of Formula One cars and all kinds of racing.”

He took the long road to Honda racing, though, studying architecture and art/industrial design in college, then teaching for five years at Notre Dame. His first job at Honda was in the motorcycle accessory and product planning departments but when the company announced it was going to enter open-wheel racing, Clarke volunteered and he was soon tasked with building the program from the ground up.

That was in 1993. By the time Clarke left Honda 15 years later, the company’s place as a major force in IndyCar racing was secure and Honda’s two-story hilltop headquarters became his legacy.

The focus of work in the building now is mainly on supporting Honda teams in IndyCar and the IMSA WeatherTech SportsCar Championship. As such, it has become a one-stop shop for racing teams, housing comprehensive engine research and development operations; prototype and production parts manufacturing; engine preparation and rebuilding; a material analysis facilities; more than a half-dozen engine dynamometer test cells; a machine shop; electronics lab; parts center; multiple conference rooms; and administrative offices.

A view of the machine shop at the at the Honda Racing Corporation in Santa Clarita.

A view of the machine shop at the at the Honda Racing Corporation in Santa Clarita.

(Robert Hanashiro / For the Times)

Advertisement

Next year it will provide support for Honda’s effort to supply Formula One engines to Aston Martin.

Mostly the building is a maze of quiet office space where engineers sketch out their designs on computer screens, well-lit assembly bays where mechanics assemble the prototypes, and the noisy high-tech dyno rooms where those prototypes are tested. Every stage of a racing engine, from conception and construction to being shipped to the track, is managed at the facility.

“We develop the technology quickly,” said David Salters, the British-born engineer who heads HRC. “We try them. Sometimes they work, sometimes they don’t work and you try again. The point of having a racing facility inside your company is you can be agile. You can try stuff. You can train the people.

“The people are the most important thing of all this.”

Advertisement

The whole process is more NASA than NASCAR in that there’s not a speck of grease or oil on the bright, white vinyl flooring and everybody’s hands are clean.

David Salters, president of Honda Racing Corporation.

David Salters, president of Honda Racing Corporation.

(Michael L. Levitt / LAT Images via American Honda Motor Co.)

“This is a world-class facility. It needs to be clinical and professional in the processes and systems we have here,” said Salters, who was head of engine development for the Ferrari F1 team and held a similar position at Mercedes-Benz before joining Honda a decade ago.

“It’s like an operating theater. We’re basically dealing with engines or electrical systems, which are like jewelry. They cannot tolerate dirt or anything like that. Everything has to be spotless and clean and well-organized. This is aerospace.”

Advertisement

And when the engines don’t work, they’re brought back to HRC and the engineering process is repeated in reverse in search of flaws. As for why they’re doing all that in a sleepy bedroom community better known for its paved bike paths and rustic hiking trails than for its motorsports history, that’s easy: Location, location, location.

Clarke originally expected to recruit engineers from Indianapolis and Charlotte, N.C., the heartland of American racing, while Honda insisted on keeping its operations near its corporate offices in Torrance. Clarke feared dropping people from the Midwest and South into L.A.’s traffic-clogged sprawl would be such a culture shock, he’d lose his best engineers.

So he chose Santa Clarita, which was isolated enough to not feel like L.A., but close enough to Torrance to be accessible. And the building came with an “Only in L.A.” feature: It shares a driveway with the studio where the popular TV series “NCIS” is filmed.

“Every so often a helicopter will land in the car park and we’re all told we can’t go outside in case we get swept away,” Salters said with a chuckle. “There was some ‘Star Trek’ thing where they decided our foyer could be useful. So for a few weeks we had a movie set in our foyer; we rented it out.

“You’ve got to look at business opportunities.”

Advertisement
Adi Susilo, chief engineer of powertrain at Honda Racing Corporation, looks over large monitors.

Adi Susilo, chief engineer of powertrain at Honda Racing Corporation, looks over large monitors before the start of the 12 Hours of Sebring in March.

(Robert Hanashiro / For the Times)

It’s early on a chilly Saturday in March and HRC’s headquarters is mostly empty save for one corner on the building’s second floor where nearly a dozen people, some wearing headphones, have gathered behind computer screens facing six giant TV monitors.

A continent away, in central Florida, more than 50 cars are lined up for the 12 hours of Sebring. Each driver with a Honda engine has an engineer monitoring their car’s performance.

Before the pandemic, engineers would travel and work with race teams on site. But for the last four years the engineers have been working mostly at HRC, monitoring in-car telemetry that provides real-time information about everything from engine status and tire pressure to suspension behavior.

Advertisement

“Data is king,” said Adi Susilo, one of the HRC engineers. “Humans make mistakes. Data rarely does.”

F1 teams have monitored telemetry remotely for years, but it didn’t become common in IndyCar racing until 2023. Now it’s a vital part of every major racing series, including NASCAR.

Powertrain chief engineer Adi Susilo looks at a full-size mock up of an IMSA prototype at Honda Racing Corporation.

Powertrain chief engineer Adi Susilo looks at a full-size mock up of an IMSA prototype at Honda Racing Corporation.

(Robert Hanashiro / For the Times)

Engineers work out of what looks like a college classroom, only quieter. When the sound of a disembodied voice does cackle out of a headphone, it sounds like NASA Mission Control, the tone flat and unemotional, the conversation short and to the point.

Advertisement

“It’s better for solving problems,” said Susilo about working away from the track. “If there’s a problem, you just walk downstairs and talk to the guy who built the engine.”

That won’t be the case Sunday. For the Indy 500, Susilo said it’s all hands on deck, so most of Honda’s race-day engineers are in Indianapolis where the telemetry will be broadcast to their work stations in trailers at the track.

“A few of the IndyCar races are run that way,” he said, “but the 500 is almost always run that way just because everyone’s out here for the event. We’re also testing a new, hopefully more robust, telemetry streaming as it’s much harder to make sure we get 15 car’s worth of data.”

At first, the idea of having engineers looming electronically over the timing stand was a hard sell. Trusting someone with clean fingernails watching the race on monitors thousands of miles away wasn’t easy for some crew chiefs.

“What happens for people like me is that you have to erase the old-school way of thinking,” said Mike Hull, a former mechanic and driver who is now the managing director for Chip Ganassi Racing and chief strategist for driver Scott Dixon, a six-time IndyCar champion. “You’re electronically shoulder to shoulder with them.

Advertisement

“If you don’t listen to what somebody has to say, it stifles free thinking. Free thinking sends you down a path that you may not have originally been on, but makes you stronger at what you’re doing.”

1 Race engines being assembled at Honda Racing Corporation.

2 A technician in the HRC machine shop works on an engine.

3 Engineers monitor data during the 12 Hours of Sebring in March.

4 A engineer monitors telemetry remotely from HRC headquarters.

1. Race engines being assembled at Honda Racing Corporation. 2. A technician in the HRC machine shop works on an engine. 3. Engineers monitor data during the 12 Hours of Sebring in March. 4. A engineer monitors telemetry remotely from HRC headquarters. (Robert Hanashiro / For the Times)

Dixon, the 2008 Indy 500 champion who will start Sunday’s race in the second row, agrees. Which is he why he’s made several trips to HRC to personally thank the engineers who design his engines and those who help direct his races.

Advertisement

“You always feel like there’s a big group behind you,” he said. “You just don’t get to see all them in one place but you know the machine is there, working pretty hard.”

One drawback, Dixon said, is you have to be careful what you say on the radio during races because you never know who’s listening.

“Twenty people at home, just on the team side, will be listening just on that one car,” he said. “So the communication is very wide open. You definitely have to watch your Ps and Qs.”

Two years later race teams have grown so comfortable with people looking over their shoulders, the engineers have become as much a part of the team as the cars. So when a nearby wildfire forced the evacuation of the building, Honda rented rooms at a nearby hotel, set up their TVs, computer monitors and a coffee machine in a conference room and worked from there.

“We’re pretty blind without it. The race teams are pretty competitive,” Susilo said. “They feel that instinct still does work. But it’s more data-driven.”

Advertisement
Honda powertain engineer Jake Marthaler monitors data during the 12 Hours of Sebring in March.

Honda powertain engineer Jake Marthaler monitors data during the 12 Hours of Sebring in March.

(Robert Hanashiro / For the Times)

Given the investment, the pressure can be intense.

“Every two weeks we want to have the latest development. We want to have made progress,” Salters said. “Every two weeks you have a deadline and the deadline does not move. It’s not like they’re going to say ‘OK, we’ll just delay the race a week.’ The flag drops, you’ve got to be ready.

“It’s sort of an engineering sport isn’t it? It’s like a true sport; the best team will win.”

Advertisement

If the IndyCar-Honda marriage has mostly been good for both sides, it has recently hit a rocky patch.

Honda’s supply contract with IndyCar ends next year and the company hasn’t hid its distaste over the cheating scandals that have recently tarnished the series. Last week Team Penske drivers Josef Newgarden, the two-time defending Indy 500 champion, and Will Power were forced to the back of the field for the start of Sunday’s race after illegally modified parts were found on their cars. Team Penske, which uses Chevrolet engines, was also caught cheating at the beginning of the 2024 season.

On Wednesday, the team fired three of its top racing executives. IndyCar, which is owned by Roger Penske (also the owner of Team Penske) said it is exploring the creation of an independent governing body absent of Penske employees.

Scott Dixon drives into the first turn during practice for the Indianapolis 500 on Friday.

Scott Dixon drives into the first turn during practice for the Indianapolis 500 on Friday.

(Michael Conroy / Associated Press)

Advertisement

That may not be enough to restore trust in the series. Honda, which supplies engines to 13 full-season IndyCar entries and three Indy 500-only cars, has declined to comment on the rules violations, but confirmed its continued participation in the series beyond 2026 may depend on Penske’s ability to separate himself from policing the series he owns and also competes in.

Honda said in a written statement Thursday that it has many concerns, among them “the relatively high overall cost to participate as an engine supplier” and “the potential (perceived or real) conflict of interest which may exist” with Penske’s ownership of the racing series, three of the cars competing in the series and his “significant stake” in Ilmor Engineering, which designs and manufactures engines for Chevrolet, Honda’s biggest competitor.

“Honda continues to have ongoing negotiations with IndyCar’s management and technical teams regarding our future as an engine supplier for the series,” said Chuck Chayefsky, manager of Honda & Acura Motorsports.

Whatever road Honda takes with IndyCar, it’s unlikely to change most of the day-to-day work at HRC, which is heavily involved with IMSA and will soon be working on F1 power-unit development.

So while the cars may change, the racing will never stop.

Advertisement
The car Ryan Hunter-Reay drove to victory for Andretti Autosport in the 2014 Indianapolis 500.

The car Ryan Hunter-Reay drove to victory for Andretti Autosport in the 2014 Indianapolis 500 sits on display at Honda Racing Corporation in Santa Clarita.

(Robert Hanashiro / For the Times)

“Thirty years ago our sole purpose in life was to look after racing in North America for Honda and Acura,” Salters said before last week’s events in Indianapolis. “Last year we changed that. We’re now part of a global racing organization. That’s another opportunity for associates here.”

“The automotive world, it’s pivoting,” he continued. “We are trying some new stuff. We’ll see how it goes.”

One chapter has been written. But the story isn’t finished.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Podcast host says Jordon Hudson 'choreographed' portion of Bill Belichick's recent interview

Published

on

Podcast host says Jordon Hudson 'choreographed' portion of Bill Belichick's recent interview

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

One of Bill Belichick’s stops among his book tour was on an episode of “The Pivot” podcast with Ryan Clark and Channing Crowder.

Belichick’s first interview promoting the book garnered tons of media attention, when Jordon Hudson was caught on camera butting into the conversation when Belichick was asked how they met.

Belichick has credited Hudson, 24, for being the business brainiac to his brand, but he has remained mum on getting any further than that in public interviews.

Advertisement

Jordon Hudson the girlfriend of Bill Belichick in attendance at Loudermilk Center for Excellence on Dec. 12, 2024. (Jim Dedmon-Imagn Images)

But that business side of Hudson was all in on Belichick’s “Pivot” interview, according to Crowder.

“He’s all in if you talk football, but if you start talking personal stuff, he starts doing the mumble and the one-word answers, and his old lady is different. She lurks,” Crowder said on his separate radio show. “It’s weird to know him as Coach Belichick running the entire organization as GM, head coach, talent coordinator, all that stuff, and then to see this tiny little 95-pound girl pretty much telling him what to do.”

Crowder added, but did not elaborate on, that Hudson “choreographed the open,” which included Belichick’s accomplishments as both a coach and author.

“She was there. She kind of coordinates and brand manages. She has her paws on the situation. It’s different . . . it was weird to be around Belichick and Jordon. I don’t see Belichick in that light. But he just smiles and nods,” Crowder continued.

Advertisement
Ryan Clark, Channing Crowder, and Jordon Hudson

Ryan Clark, Channing Crowder, and Jordon Hudson (Getty Images/IMAGN)

AIRBNB OWNERS SHARE SHOCK OF FINDING SHIRTLESS BILL BELICHICK ON THEIR DOORBELL CAMERA: ‘CREEPY OLD GUY’

Hudson was not at Belichick’s interview with “Good Morning America” last week.

According to reports, Hudson interrupted the CBS interview several times and even stormed off at one point, delaying the interview by around 30 minutes. 

Belichick released a statement saying he was “surprised” about getting the questions about his relationship and that when Hudson had stepped in, she had been doing her job. He went on to accuse CBS of creating a “false narrative” with so-called “selectively edited clips.”

CBS responded, disagreeing with Belichick’s version of events. 

Advertisement
Bill Belichick and Jordon Hudson

North Carolina Tar Heels football head coach Bill Belichick and his girlfriend Jordon Hudson look on during the first half of the game between the North Carolina Tar Heels and the Duke Blue Devils at Dean E. Smith Center on March 8, 2025, in Chapel Hill, North Carolina.  (Jared C. Tilton/Getty Images)

In the interview with The Pivot, Belichick cleared the air on Hudson’s reported involvement with “Hard Knocks,” ultimately saying that the show was not a match with UNC. He also reiterated that Hudson is not involved with UNC football, a statement that the school itself made following reports that Hudson was barred from the facility.

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending