Connect with us

Sports

Major league players’ union wants to represent minor leaguers

Published

on

Major league players’ union wants to represent minor leaguers

Rob Manfred didn’t make his title in baseball as a former participant, as a normal supervisor or crew president or crew proprietor, or as a advertising and marketing or broadcasting govt.

Manfred, the commissioner, made his title as a labor lawyer. On his watch a quarter-century of labor peace collapsed final December, when homeowners locked out gamers. And, in a dramatic transfer late Sunday night time, the Main League Baseball Gamers Assn. declared its intention to characterize minor league gamers.

If sufficient minor league gamers agree, Manfred and the most important league homeowners would not resolve for themselves how a lot minor leaguers needs to be paid. Collective bargaining would additionally decide if minor leaguers ought to proceed to be certain to the most important league crew that signed them for so long as seven years, and what requirements needs to be set in areas from housing and diet to licensing and merchandising.

“Poverty wages, oppressive reserve guidelines, self-discipline with out due course of, ever-expanding offseason obligations, appropriation of mental property, substandard consideration to participant well being and security, and a continual lack of respect for minor leaguers as an entire (to call only a few) — these cancers on our recreation exist as a result of Minor League Gamers have by no means had a seat on the bargaining desk,” MLBPA govt director Tony Clark mentioned in an electronic mail to brokers, first obtained by the Athletic. “It’s time for that to vary.”

Advertisement

That would have modified with out the intervention of the gamers union, however the reforms Manfred and the homeowners have made inside the minor leagues largely have been reactive moderately than proactive.

When a bunch of minor leaguers sued MLB for violating the federal minimal wage regulation in 2014, MLB responded by lobbying Congress for an exemption to the regulation. With out an exemption, MLB warned, minor league groups could possibly be eradicated.

In 2018, Congress permitted the exemption. MLB eradicated 43 minor league groups anyway.

This 12 months, because the Senate Judiciary Committee explored whether or not to strip MLB of its antitrust exemption, Manfred steered that motion might consequence within the elimination of much more minor league groups.

Within the meantime, in 2020, a nonprofit group known as Advocates for Minor Leaguers had shaped, utilizing social media to indicate the cramped quarters and stingy meals to which minor leaguers are accustomed. In response, for the primary time, MLB agreed to offer housing for minor leaguers.

Advertisement

And, after a choose dominated that minor leaguers needs to be thought-about year-round staff and needs to be paid for spring coaching in addition to the common season, MLB agreed to pay $185 million to settle that 2014 lawsuit.

That settlement didn’t quell rising public strain. In July, with regard to the antitrust exemption, Manfred advised me: “I can’t consider a spot the place the exemption is admittedly significant, aside from franchise relocation.” The Senate Judiciary Committee took notice, and committee Chairman Dick Durbin (D-Sick.) advised me he deliberate to name Manfred to a listening to in Washington, doubtless in September or October.

In the meantime, on the All-Star Recreation that month, Manfred mentioned this of minor leaguers: “I reject the premise that they aren’t paid a dwelling wage.” Past wage, he referenced signing bonuses and free housing.

On the identical day, Harry Marino, govt director of Advocates for Minor Leaguers, mentioned this of main league homeowners: “I feel the league could be very nervous.”

With that crescendo of criticism, the MLBPA supplied to do what it had lengthy resisted: characterize the minor leaguers. The MLBPA had helped minor leaguers in different methods, however the potential for battle with the most important leaguers had been a hurdle.

Advertisement

“In negotiations, all the pieces is actually traded greenback for greenback,” pitcher and MLBPA consultant Andrew Miller advised me in 2018. “There is perhaps a risk for us to strain the MLB aspect to boost wages on the minor league aspect. Nonetheless, we might most likely be sacrificing, say, arbitration, or some type of {dollars} which might be being spent on us elsewhere. That’s simply the truth of the deal.”

On Sunday night time, based on The Athletic, Miller was one of many voices on video selling the MLBPA plan to minor leaguers. An MLBPA official mentioned nobody on the union’s govt board voted in opposition to the plan.

On Monday, the union publicly introduced its determination to arrange the minor leaguers, and Advocates mentioned it will droop operations, as its staffers had accepted positions inside the MLBPA. Advocates and MLBPA leaders had quietly labored on the organizing plan for months, based on an individual aware of its progress.

The MLBPA plans to determine a separate bargaining unit for the minor leaguers, as their labor settlement can be impartial of the present collective bargaining settlement for main leaguers.

The wage for a triple-A participant begins at about $14,000. The wage for a participant on the highest stage of hockey’s minor leagues begins at about $52,000. The minor leaguers in hockey are unionized, and now the minor leaguers in baseball is perhaps too.

Advertisement

That doesn’t imply minor leaguers in baseball will get higher salaries subsequent season. On Sunday night time, the MLBPA requested minor leaguers to signal a card authorizing the union as their consultant in collective bargaining. If 30% signal, based on federal labor regulation, minor leaguers would vote on whether or not to hitch the MLBPA, with a majority vote required.

If a considerable variety of minor leaguers signal, the MLBPA might ask MLB to acknowledge the minor leaguers as unionized and not using a vote, and negotiations on a contract might begin. However MLB — like several employer — might demand a vote. Within the time previous that vote, MLB — like several employer — might attempt to persuade minor leaguers they might be higher off with out the union.

Beneath Manfred, the homeowners have improved minor league wages and dealing circumstances, however reluctantly, and never with out exterior strain. That observe report signifies the homeowners is perhaps higher off working with the union right here, moderately than combating the union and attempting to power a vote. The homeowners, bear in mind, already misplaced $185 million combating minor leaguers.

An MLB marketing campaign to withstand a union might quantity to: “Belief Manfred; he’ll do the fitting factor.” In that case, right here’s betting a bit of metallic that main leaguers would rush to rally across the minor league trigger.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Sports

Battle in Huntington Beach after transgender surfer barred from longboard competition

Published

on

Battle in Huntington Beach after transgender surfer barred from longboard competition

Sasha Jane Lowerson just wanted to surf.

But when the Australian longboard surfer attempted to enter an upcoming competition in Huntington Beach, the athlete, who was born intersex, learned that the organizer wasn’t going to allow transgender athletes.

Instead, surfers would be required to enter the category of the gender they were assigned at birth, the organizer said in a video posted to Instagram last month.

The video received over 4,000 likes and more than 1,000 comments from people both supporting and arguing against the move. This week, it prompted the California Coastal Commission to intervene in what equity advocates say is an issue of access to the state’s coastline and an ongoing problem of discrimination against transgender athletes.

A crowd gathers to watch the 2023 U.S. Open of Surfing in Huntington Beach.

Advertisement

(Allen J. Schaben / Los Angeles Times)

“As I walk my journey through the turmoil and the implications of people that want to spread misinformation, I’ve found myself wondering why?” Lowerson wrote in a post on Instagram in response to the situation. “Just why [do] people hate me for existing?”

The fight playing out in Huntington Beach is part of a larger discussion over the rights of transgender individuals across the country, particularly those in professional sports.

Former President Trump has said he plans to ban transgender athletes from participating in women’s sports if he again wins the White House in November. Though the city of Huntington Beach is not part of the fight, some LGBTQ+ activists have expressed concern after the actions of a new, conservative City Council — which, among other things, banned Pride flags from being flown at city properties.

Advertisement

Advocates such as surf equity activist Sabrina Brennan say a ban has nothing to do with athleticism or competition.

“It’s a Republican and religious agenda that’s playing out and, frankly, harming people,” Brennan said. “The entire LGBTQ community is being negatively impacted. There’s a lot of damage happening.”

Sabrina Brennan stands on a bluff overlooking the sea.

Sabrina Brennan of the group Surf Equity says the Huntington Beach event’s attempt to bar transgender contestants has nothing to do with athleticism or competition. “It’s a Republican and religious agenda that’s playing out,” she said.

(Melina Mara / Getty Images)

Lowerson did not respond to Times requests for comment. However, she told the Inertia that before she entered the Huntington Beach Longboard Pro contest, scheduled for Saturday, she reached out to organizer Todd Messick to make sure a spot was available for her. She didn’t hear back, but saw his video post calling for more entrants in the women’s division, so she entered, she told the outlet.

Advertisement

In his Instagram video on April 25, Messick addressed Lowerson’s entry, saying that his policy was to “support biological males and biological females in their divisions, respectively.” The policy, he said, complied with the standards of the sport’s governing body, the International Surfing Assn.

“You guys can live however and whatever you want to do in life. It’s not for me to decide,” he said in the video. “But it is for me to decide what’s fair and not fair for the American Longboard Assn. That being said, we’re going to stick to our guns. I want to offer an equal playing field for all athletes.”

Messick did not respond to a call seeking comment on Thursday.

The video quickly caught Brennan’s attention, and she contacted the California Coastal Commission.

Fans watch the U.S. Open of Surfing in Huntington Beach in 2023.

Fans watch the U.S. Open of Surfing challenger series in Huntington Beach in 2023.

(Gary Coronado / Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

International Surfing Assn. policy, which was updated last year, states that a transgender woman may participate in a women’s event if she provides a written declaration saying she identifies as a woman and tells the organization’s medical commission that her testosterone level has been below a certain concentration in the last 12 months. Lowerson wrote online that she meets all requirements for her to compete in the women’s category.

“I think discrimination on public property, on public lands, is completely unacceptable,” Brennan said. “To do this in a surf competition is absolutely not right. The ocean belongs to all of us.”

Brennan, who runs Surf Equity, which aims to improve access, equity and justice in pro surfing, said forcing a transgender athlete to “compete in a gender category that they don’t identify with is just really wrong.”

It’s also not in compliance with current policy, she said.

Advertisement

California Coastal Commission staff wrote in a letter Tuesday to Messick that if he wants to host the event, he will have to allow transgender athletes to participate. Banning those individuals violates the Coastal Act, a landmark law that declared the beach as a public treasure to be shared by everyone, according to the letter.

“Prohibiting or unfairly limiting transgender athletes from competing in this or any surf competition that takes place in the coastal waters of California does not meet the requirements of the public access policies of the Coastal Act and impedes access by discriminating against transgender surfers,” Coastal Commission Executive Director Kate Huckelbridge wrote.

The letter was written to formalize a conversation staff had with Messick in which he agreed to allow transgender participants in the contest, according to the document.

Lowerson said in an interview with the Inertia that she entered the Huntington Beach contest to have fun. But now she’s decided not to participate.

This is the American Longboard Assn.’s second year hosting the competition in Huntington Beach.

Advertisement

Brennan and others have long fought to make surfing — traditionally a male-dominated sport — more inclusive in California. And this isn’t the first time the California Coastal Commission has stepped in.

In 2016, the commission required the Titans of Mavericks, a famous big-wave contest near Half Moon Bay, to have a heat for women if it wanted a permit. For decades, the contest had invited only men.

In 2018, the State Lands Commission indicated it would lease the public beach for Mavericks only if women and men were awarded the same prize money. Historically, women have been paid less than male surfers participating in the same contests. Commission staff wrote in a report at the time that “the waves do not discriminate.”

Sawyer Lindblad placed first in the finals of the U.S. Open of Surfing in Huntington Beach in 2023.

Sawyer Lindblad placed first in the finals of the U.S. Open of Surfing in Huntington Beach in 2023.

(Gary Coronado / Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

Lowerson has long been a public figure in the surfing world. In March 2022, she placed ninth in the Noosa Festival of Surfing and was the first transgender woman to compete at the professional level. She also placed first in the Open Women’s and Women’s Logger divisions at the Western Australian State Titles that year.

Despite the gains made by transgender athletes, there have been persistent detractors. Sportswear company Rip Curl faced backlash this year after it featured Lowerson in an Instagram post as part of the company’s “Meet the Local Heroes of Western Australia” campaign. The comments eventually prompted the company to remove the post, according to published reports.

“I just want to be me, and I want to be included,” Lowerson told the Australian Broadcasting Co. in 2022.

Lowerson’s name did not appear on a list of individuals participating in the women’s division of the Huntington Beach Longboard Pro competition published Thursday. The roster had two spots left.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Sports

Julian Edelman recalls tense backstage moment between Robert Kraft, Bill Belichick at Tom Brady's roast

Published

on

Julian Edelman recalls tense backstage moment between Robert Kraft, Bill Belichick at Tom Brady's roast

There was a noticeable amount of tension in the air before Netflix’s “The Roast of Tom Brady” kicked off, according to former New England Patriots star Julian Edelman.

Edelman was joined by Drew Bledsoe, who was the Patriots starting quarterback before Brady took the reins, on a recent edition of the “Games with Names” podcast. The two former NFL stars , who both attended the roast, detailed the seemingly tense pre-show moment.

Edelman said his former coach Bill Belichick was initially enjoying his time in the green room and was “excited” to see so many of his former players. 

Julian Edelman speaks onstage during G.R.O.A.T The Greatest Roast Of All Time: Tom Brady for the Netflix is a Joke Festival at The Kia Forum on May 05, 2024 in Inglewood, California.   (Matt Winkelmeyer/Getty Images for Netflix)

Advertisement

“Pre-show, we’re in the green room. Randy [Moss], Drew [Bledsoe], me, [Rob Gronkowski], we were just chilling in there,” Edelman said. “Bill was opening up, he’s having fun, he’s talking war stories, talking rookies. Doing s— we know what Bill’s about, but it was like amplified, because he’s excited to see guys because he doesn’t have a job anymore.”

SUPER BOWL CHAMP ADMITS ‘OLD-SCHOOL MENTALITY’ WOULD HAVE KEPT HIM FROM BILL BELICHICK ZINGERS DURING ROAST

But, Belichick’s relaxed demeanor quickly went out the window once longtime team owner Robert Kraft walked in.

“The tension in that room, though, could cut f—ing glass,” Edelman said. “It was so awkward. … I was just like, ‘Oh s—, this could be some fireworks.’ I just walked away.”

Tom Brady and Julian Edelman walk

Tom Brady #12 of the New England Patriots and Julian Edelman #11 look on after Edelman scored a touchdown in the second quarter of the AFC Wild Card Playoff game at Gillette Stadium on January 04, 2020 in Foxborough, Massachusetts. (Maddie Meyer/Getty Images)

Bledsoe described the awkwardness as “some crazy s—” and hinted that the tension was “very, very real.”

Advertisement

But, Bledsoe did note that Belichick and Kraft did manage to have a brief conversation.

“They did break it down and got together for 10 minutes at least, the two of them,” the former Patriots quarterback said.

At one point during the roast, comedian Kevin Hart encouraged Belichick and Kraft to both drink a shot of alcohol as a show of goodwill.

Robert Kraft and Bill Belichick and Kevin Hart

Bill Belichick, Kevin Hart and Robert Kraft speak onstage during G.R.O.A.T The Greatest Roast Of All Time: Tom Brady for the Netflix is a Joke Festival at The Kia Forum on May 05, 2024 in Inglewood, California. (Matt Winkelmeyer/Getty Images for Netflix)

“I want to say this is the greatest coach in the history of the game that did what no one else has done,” Kraft told the audience. “And having Tom Brady and him was the greatest honor the good Lord gave me.”

Belichick left the Patriots earlier this year after a remarkable 24 seasons with the team. The Patriots said the organization and the coach “mutually agreed to part ways.”

Advertisement

However, Belichick and Kraft’s relationship seemed to grow particularly sour in recent years. Belichick did not land another coaching job once he left New England, which is something Kraft may have contributed to.

In April, ESPN reported that Kraft contacted Falcons owner Arthur Blank following Belichick’s interview for Atlanta’s head coaching job and suggested that the coach was not trustworthy.

Belichick coached the franchise to six Super Bowls during his tenure. But, the Patriots largely struggled following Brady’s departure. Belichick never won another playoff game after Brady left, and New England finished the 2023 season with a 4-13 record.

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Sports

UC president recommends UCLA pay Cal $10 million a year for leaving Pac-12

Published

on

UC president recommends UCLA pay Cal $10 million a year for leaving Pac-12

In another possible blow to a UCLA athletic department awash in debt, the president of the University of California system is recommending that the Bruins pay sister school California $10 million a year through 2029-30 for leaving the Golden Bears to scramble for a new home after UCLA’s move to the Big Ten conference alongside USC contributed to the dismantling of the Pac-12.

The proposed subsidy, based on a projected $50-million difference per year in revenue between the schools’ athletic departments, is at the high end of the $2-million-to-$10-million annual payment that was discussed in December 2022 when the UC regents approved UCLA’s departure to the Big Ten.

The recommendation from UC president Michael V. Drake, which would start this year and run through the existing term of UCLA’s contract with the Big Ten, is expected to be discussed at the board of regents meeting May 14 to 16 at UC Merced. The regents could elect to reduce or adopt the suggested payment.

A $10 million annual payment on top of the amount UCLA has committed to spending to support its athletes — as much as $10.32 million a year for enhanced nutrition, mental health and academic tutoring in addition to more chartered flights to mitigate travel challenges — could put the Bruins at a competitive disadvantage against other Big Ten schools.

The payment known as “Calimony” will penalize UCLA after the school announced in June 2022 that it was leaving for the Big Ten and a much richer media rights deal starting in August 2024. Cal subsequently agreed to join the Atlantic Coast Conference alongside Stanford and Southern Methodist while taking a reduced share of the conference’s media rights deal.

Advertisement

If enacted, this payment would put another dent in UCLA’s athletic budget. The Bruins have run up $167.7 million in debt since the 2019 fiscal year, one of the reasons the school sought an infusion of cash as part of its move to the Big Ten.

UCLA and the other Big Ten schools are projected to receive an annual media rights payment of roughly $60 million as opposed to around $11 million a year for Cal during its first seven years of membership in the ACC. Cal will receive larger percentages of the conference’s revenue pot over the next two years before getting a full share in Year 10.

“This is a materially different outcome for UC Berkeley than what was projected in December 2022 when there was still optimism about the follow-on Pac-12 media rights deal,” Drake wrote in suggesting the maximum possible subsidy.

The letter also suggested that if there was a change in revenues or expenses for either school exceeding 10% over the 2024-25 figures, the regents would further discuss UCLA’s payment to adjust accordingly.

Cal‘s athletic department is facing dire financial challenges of its own, requiring a reported $30 million in subsidies from the campus during the 2023 fiscal year to balance its budget. The letter from Drake’s office alluded to the measures that Cal was expected to take to address its financial shortfall.

Advertisement

“These include the development of new department revenue streams, additional philanthropic support, consolidating athletic scholarships to the campus Financial Aid and Scholarships Office,” the letter read, “and an additional extraordinary payout from athletics-related endowed funds.”

Continue Reading

Trending