Connect with us

Washington, D.C

What I Saw At The Insurrection

Published

on

What I Saw At The Insurrection


The No Kings rally in Washington, D.C., was peaceful and plainly patriotic.

I looked everywhere for Mike Johnson at the No Kings rally in the heart of the nation’s Capitol last Saturday. I even wore my Civil Beat press pass so I could ask him questions, one professional to another.

But the House speaker was nowhere to be found. Maybe he took the day off. The government was shut down, of course, and House representatives were on an extended paid recess.

I covered the protest in my role as a journalist and, after a few hours, I wanted to ask Johnson why he’d said the gatherings opposing President Donald Trump were “hate America” rallies. Because all I saw that day were tens of thousands of people of all ages and backgrounds exercising the right to peaceably assemble along with the freedom of speech, press and even religion.

Advertisement

It was, to use the words of Trump about Jan. 6, 2021, a “day of love.”

Civil Beat is focusing on transparency, accountability and ethics in government and other institutions. Help us by sending ideas and anecdotes to sunshine@civilbeat.org.

All that was missing was the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

But then, that First Amendment clause was implicit. The D.C. rally, part of an estimated 7 million protesters at more than 2,700 locations in all 50 states and D.C. (according to No Kings), sent a simple message: America does not need a king.

Trump is not a king, but you can be forgiven if you believe he’s acting like one. He wants to mint a commemorative $1 coin with his mug on it. His first foreign visit as president was to a kingdom, Saudi Arabia, and his second was to the United Kingdom. He wants to build an arch, based on the Arc de Triomphe in Paris, across from the Lincoln Memorial — an  “Arc de Trump.”

Ed O’Keefe of CBS News reportedly asked the president who the arch is for, and Trump pointed at himself: “Me.”

Advertisement
The No Kings rally Oct. 18 in Washington, D.C., was held not far from the U.S. Capitol. (Chad Blair/Civil Beat/2025)

The purpose of No Kings is to accuse the president of behaving more like a monarch than an elected official, and it is succeeding in that regard.

One of the first speakers at the D.C. rally, Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut, reminded the huge throng that his state was the first to adopt a written constitution, thus rejecting the English monarchy. The nation, he said, was not “on the verge” of an authoritarian, totalitarian takeover but smack dab in the middle of one.

Murphy then asked rhetorically if that scared people.

“You can handle the truth,” he said, answering his own question and thrilling the crowd.

‘Jesus Was An Immigrant’

I was in D.C. to attend the Society of Professional Journalists MediaFest 2025. I cut out a bit early on Saturday to make my way toward the location of the No Kings rally at Pennsylvania Avenue Northwest and 3rd Street Northwest, an area astride The Mall and not far from the U.S. Capitol.

My CB colleague in D.C., Nick Grube, had shared with me beforehand advice from the National Press Club on reporting in potentially dangerous environments: “If protesters want to shout in your face, don’t get into arguments with them. If police ask you to step back, do not just take one step and look defiant.  Ask them how far back to go.”

Advertisement

Nick also advised that I write his phone number on my arm in case I needed to post bail.

Cosplay and costumes were donned by many an attendee at the No Kings rally. (Chad Blair/Civil Beat/2025)

It wasn’t necessary.

My first encounter with security on No Kings day came well before I got to the rally site. Dozens of Metropolitan police, on foot and bicycles, were paralleling a large group of protesters as they marched and chanted toward Pennsylvania Avenues.

“Excuse me,” one officer politely said as he pedaled by me.

“Sorry,” said another.

Then, as the marchers were to turn on to 10th Street, someone fell. The procession halted and the police asked everyone not in the march to clear the street by moving to the sidewalks. Everyone complied as the police surrounded the injured man and someone called an ambulance.

Advertisement

I was momentarily worried that a fight might erupt. Surreally, the man fell on the same block as Ford’s Theatre. (“Sic semper tyrannis,” John Wilkes Booth shouted after assassinating the 16th president.)

But it was all good, the injured man walked it off and the rally soon resumed.

Trump allies may link No Kings participants to the far-left Antifa movement and the “pro-Hamas wing,” essentially deriding them as domestic terrorists. But it’s hard to imagine a masked, hardcore activist in black pausing to let the authorities do their job.

The peaceful display of civil disobedience was also to the credit of No Kings organizers and supporters, all linked over the internet and social media. Most rallies lasted only two hours, something easy to squeeze into a weekend. Most participants took public transportation or walked. People were advised to bring water and snacks and sunblock and hats.

It was also recommended folks wear something yellow to show unity, echoing previous large protests in Hong Kong and Ukraine. But the colors I saw most that day were red, white and blue. These patriots were proud to be American, concerned about the direction of their country and willing to show their faces in public even as federal troops and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials prowl the streets.

Advertisement

The best part of a No Kings rally are the homemade signs. Here are a few that for me captured the mood that day: “Free D.C.” “Detox from Fox.” “Fight truth decay.” “Jesus was an immigrant.” “It’s so bad even I am here.”

It is obvious that many No King attendees are not fans of the 45th and 47th president. The f-word was used liberally, even though there were kids all around, many of them costumed as animals to mock ICE agents.

Johnson told ABC News the next day that he was upset about the rhetoric of protesters, for example, calling Trump a fascist. The rallies, he said, were ironic.

“If President Trump was a king, the government would be open right now,” he said. “If President Trump was a king, they would not have been able to engage in that free speech exercise out on the (National) Mall.”

In fact, Trump has pushed successfully to silence and punish many of his critics — in the courts, in the Congress, in the governors’ mansions, in the universities, in the media. It sometimes seems as if he wants the U.S. to be more like Thailand, where a lèse-majesté law forbids insulting the monarchy.

Advertisement

One could practically predict Trump’s reaction to the No Kings events: He posted an AI-generated video showing him wearing a crown in a fighter jet showering the people with poop.

The Right To Assemble

Insurrection can be defined as an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government. Insurrections are often violent, but there was no violence at No Kings in D.C. Unless I missed it, for example, no one was holding a sign that read, “Hang JD Vance.”

And, while some protesters called for impeachment, Trump has already been impeached in the House twice and yet still occupies 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. He won the electoral college in 2024 and a plurality of the popular vote, and he will remain in the White House (albeit one now missing its East Wing) until his term ends or the 25th Amendment is invoked.

The No Kings rally was all the more remarkable for its disciplined dissent, coming as it did on a long week of stunning news for many worried about the direction of the country:

John Bolton was indicted. Charlie Kirk’s widow accepted the Presidential Medal of Freedom on his behalf. The U.S. Supreme Court indicated it may further erode the Voting Rights Act. The head of U.S. Southern Command stepped down less than a year into his post amidst the administration’s military strikes against alleged drug-smuggling boats in the Caribbean. Kristi Noem posted a TSA video in airports blaming the shutdown on the party that neither controls Congress nor the White House. Dozens of Pentagon reporters walked out of the building and surrendered their press badges, including representatives of Fox News and Newsmax. Admiration for Nazis was expressed by a group of Young Republicans and a congressional staffer. Marc Benioff said he was fine with troops coming to San Francisco (although he later changed his mind). The sentence of George Santos was commuted.

Advertisement

And Speaker Johnson? He’s refused to seat a newly elected Democrat from Arizona whose vote could open the Epstein files.

Something’s different now. And this protest felt more like an insurrection than a political rally.

Will more No Kings rallies succeed in driving Trump from office? Nope. But they are a shining example of what is best about America: the right to speak up.

The D.C. rally closed with Bernie Sanders railing against billionaires Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg for sucking up to Trump. The shutdown, the Vermont socialist argued, was all about paying for a trillion-dollar tax cut for the wealthiest among us.

The fate of democracy itself, Sanders warned, is at stake.

Advertisement

“Our experiment,” he said, “is in danger.”

One thing appears certain: The resistance will continue. It’s everywhere and growing:

(Screenshot/2025)



Source link

Washington, D.C

Senators Seek to Change Bill That Allows Military to Operate Just Like Before the DC Plane Crash

Published

on

Senators Seek to Change Bill That Allows Military to Operate Just Like Before the DC Plane Crash


Senators from both parties pushed Thursday for changes to a massive defense bill after crash investigators and victims’ families warned the legislation would undo key safety reforms stemming from a collision between an airliner and Army helicopter over Washington, D.C., that killed 67 people.

The head of the National Transportation Safety Board investigating the crash, a group of the victims’ family members and senators on the Commerce Committee all said the bill the House advanced Wednesday would make America’s skies less safe. It would allow the military to operate essentially the same way as it did before the January crash, which was the deadliest in more than two decades, they said.

Democratic Sen. Maria Cantwell and Republican Committee Chairman Sen. Ted Cruz filed two amendments Thursday to strip out the worrisome helicopter safety provisions and replace them with a bill they introduced last summer to strengthen requirements, but it’s not clear if Republican leadership will allow the National Defense Authorization Act to be changed at this stage because that would delay its passage.

“We owe it to the families to put into law actual safety improvements, not give the Department of Defense bigger loopholes to exploit,” the senators said.

Advertisement

Right now, the bill includes exceptions that would allow military helicopters to fly through the crowded airspace around the nation’s capital without using a key system called ADS-B to broadcast their locations just like they did before the January collision. The Federal Aviation Administration began requiring that in March. NTSB Chairwoman Jennifer Homendy called the bill a “significant safety setback” that is inviting a repeat of that disaster.

“It represents an unacceptable risk to the flying public, to commercial and military aircraft, crews and to the residents in the region,” Homendy said. “It’s also an unthinkable dismissal of our investigation and of 67 families … who lost loved ones in a tragedy that was entirely preventable. This is shameful.”

Senate Majority Leader John Thune said he is looking into the concerns but thinks they can be addressed by quickly passing the aviation safety bill that Cruz and Cantwell proposed last summer.

“I think that would resolve the concerns that people have about that provision, and hoping — we’ll see if we can find a pathway forward to get that bill done,” said Thune, a South Dakota Republican.

The military used national security waivers before the crash to skirt FAA safety requirements on the grounds that they worried about the security risks of disclosing their helicopters’ locations. Tim and Sheri Lilley, whose son Sam was the first officer on the American Airlines jet, said this bill only adds “a window dressing fix that would continue to allow for the setting aside of requirements with nothing more than a cursory risk assessment.”

Advertisement

Homendy said it would be ridiculous to entrust the military with assessing the safety risks when they aren’t the experts, and neither the Army nor the FAA noticed 85 close calls around Ronald Reagan National Airport in the years before the crash. She said the military doesn’t know how to do that kind of risk assessment, adding that no one writing the bill bothered to consult the experts at the NTSB who do know.

The White House and military didn’t immediately respond Thursday to questions about these safety concerns. But earlier this week Trump made it clear that he wants to sign the National Defense Authorization Act because it advances a number of his priorities and provides a 3.8% pay raise for many military members.

The Senate is expected to take up the bill next week, and it appears unlikely that any final changes will be made. But Congress is leaving for a holiday break at the end of the week, and the defense bill is considered something that must pass by the end of the year.

Story Continues

© Copyright 2025 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

Bill would rename former Black Lives Matter Plaza for slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk – WTOP News

Published

on

Bill would rename former Black Lives Matter Plaza for slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk – WTOP News


A South Carolina Republican Congresswoman wants to rename a well-known stretch of 16th Street NW in D.C. after slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

A South Carolina Republican Congresswoman wants to rename a well-known stretch of 16th Street NW in D.C. after slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

Rep. Nancy Mace introduced legislation Wednesday to designate the area once known as “Black Lives Matter Plaza” as the “Charlie Kirk Freedom of Speech Plaza.” The proposal comes three months after Kirk was killed while speaking at a free-speech event at a Utah college.

Mace said the change would honor Kirk’s commitment to the First Amendment, calling him “a champion of free speech and a voice for millions of young Americans.” Her bill would require official signs to be placed in the plaza and updates made to federal maps and records.

Advertisement

In a statement, Mace contrasted the unrest that followed George Floyd’s killing in 2020, when the plaza was created, with the response to Kirk’s death, saying the earlier period was marked by “chaos and destruction,” while Kirk’s killing brought “prayer, peace and unity.”

She argued that after Floyd’s death, “America watched criminals burn cities while police officers were ordered to stand down,” adding that officers were “vilified and abandoned by leaders who should have supported them.”

But D.C. Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton pushed back, saying Congress should not override local control.

“D.C. deserves to decide what its own streets are named since over 700,000 people live in the city,” Norton wrote on X. “D.C. is not a blank slate for Congress to fill in as it pleases.”

The stretch of 16th Street was originally dedicated as Black Lives Matter Plaza in 2020 following nationwide protests over Floyd’s death. Earlier this year, the city removed the mural.

Advertisement

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser’s office declined to comment on the bill, as did several members of the D.C. Council.

Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

© 2025 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington, D.C

Chicago woman testifies about being dragged out of car, detained by federal agents in viral video

Published

on

Chicago woman testifies about being dragged out of car, detained by federal agents in viral video


ByABC7 Chicago Digital Team

Wednesday, December 10, 2025 2:09AM

Woman testifies about being dragged out of car by feds in viral video

Chicago woman Dayanne Figueroa testified in Washington, DC about being dragged out of a car by federal agents in a viral YouTube video.

CHICAGO (WLS) — A Chicago woman, who is a U.S. citizen, testified in Washington, D.C. on Tuesday about her experience being dragged out of her car and taken into custody by federal agents.

Dayanne Figueroa told a group of senators that on Oct. 10, she had just dropped off her son at school when an SUV rammed into hers.

ABC7 Chicago is now streaming 24/7. Click here to watch

Once she was stopped, she says masked men dragged her out of her car.

Advertisement

A video posted on YouTube that has been seen more than 42,000 times shows what happened.

Figueroa was one of five U.S. citizens who testified.

Figueroa said she suffered severe bruising, nerve damage and aggravated injuries to her leg.

Copyright © 2025 WLS-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending