Connect with us

Virginia

Why retired officer says Marine Police guarding the Chesapeake Bay are being ‘wasteful’

Published

on

Why retired officer says Marine Police guarding the Chesapeake Bay are being ‘wasteful’


RICHMOND, Va. — Andrew Cortez cares deeply about the Chesapeake Bay.

“The Chesapeake Bay is our natural heritage,” Cortez said. “A healthy bay helps everyone.”

The retired law enforcement officer was an investigator for 36 years, working to keep the Chesapeake in check with different agencies as a special agent with U.S. Fish and Wildlife.

He now has concerns about the group meant to do just that: the Virginia Marine Resources Commission, which oversees Virginia Marine Police.

Advertisement

“One of the things that really struck me is the amount of money they’re spending on what I would consider to be toys, unnecessary squandering of public money,” Cortez said.

WTVR

Andrew Cortez, retired law special agent with U.S. Fish and Wildlife

He’s talking about the recent purchase of a 2024 Pathfinder, a boat commonly used for fishing, costing $183,529.16.

Documents he received through a Freedom of Information Act Request, which he shared with CBS 6, show the purchase was made on March 5. The paperwork said it would be needed by April 4, 2024.

“They’ve got these rocket launchers; they’re sort of a holder for rods. For fishing rods,” Cortez said. “And it’s got the full fisherman package on it. It’s not something that would be used for law enforcement or for fisheries research.”

Advertisement

VRMC told CBS 6 that the vessel was purchased through the competitive bidding process in compliance with all state laws and policies.

“This vessel will be deployed in the Middle Area Law Enforcement Region for the Virginia Marine Police as a daily patrol vessel to enforce Virginia fishing and safe boating laws, as well as search and rescue operations. It has not been deployed in the field for law enforcement use yet because we are in the process of up-fitting it with law enforcement specific equipment (i.e. blue lights, siren, overt police markings),” Zachary Widgeon, VMRC’s Director of Communications sent CBS 6 in an email statement.

Holmes VMRC Investigation

WTVR

Andrew Cortez and CBS 6 reporter Elizabeth Holmes

Widgeon said the fishing rod holders will be removed, along with recreational fishing features that do not have a function for law enforcement patrol.

“Any attached fishing rod holders or live wells are standard on these models when they are delivered to the dealership before sale and there is no avenue for buyers to purchase these hulls without this equipment pre-installed. Fiberglass hull vessels are not custom built for each buyer and are adapted and upfitted from a pre-formed model to adapt them to law enforcement-specific needs and uses,” Widgeon continued in the email.

Advertisement

The response goes on to say: “This 2024 Pathfinder met the Statement of Need at a price that was reasonable in line with industry standards, superfluous features that do not affect its usage as a law enforcement patrol vessel are not relevant or considered in the purchasing process.”

“This is wasteful for an agency with a budget about the size of the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts,” Cortez said.

That’s not the only thing Cortez is concerned about.

There’s also been a drop in VMRC-related arrests and subsequent convictions.

Between 2017 and 2018, there were 1,202 arrests and 988 convictions, according to Virginia Marine Police Arrests/Convictions data.

Advertisement

Between 2021 and 2022, there were 667 arrests and 533 convictions.

Based on the numbers, Cortez thinks that’s far too few.

“Their conviction rate is 73 percent, which is dismal,” Cortez said. “In wildlife law enforcement, marine law enforcement, it should be in the high 90s, because you’re catching people in the act.”

Holmes VMRC Investigation

WTVR

Widgeon said in an email that conviction and arrest numbers have fluctuated in the time frame comparing 2017-2018 and 2021-2022.

Advertisement

“The disparity in total numbers between the 2017-2018 and 2021-2022 period comes from three categories: saltwater reactional license violations, Fisherman Identification Program (FIP) violations, and miscellaneous law enforcement (i.e. non-conservation violations, traffic, etc.),” the email reads.

Widgeon said the shift away from focusing on non-conservation violations, traffic offenses, recreational license violations, and FIP violations is based on an intentional shift in the way that the Virginia Marine Police leadership focused the patrol and enforcement efforts of officers.

“The Virginia Marine Police are the only law enforcement agency whose main charge is protecting Virginian’s marine resources and tidal waters, and so we should focus our efforts on that charge,” Widgeon said.

Widgeon said VMRC is giving officers more discretion in how they enforce the law.

“I have friends still in the agency,” Cortez said. “They tell me that about six officers write half the tickets. That’s kind of lopsided.”

Advertisement

Cortez isn’t the only one challenging the VMRC’s practices.

In April, the Virginia Police Benevolent Association sent a letter to the attorney general’s office, claiming Marine Police Officers were illegally recorded while in the workplace.

It also claimed several “police package” Dodge Durangos that were said to be used for “agency police usage” were going to non-sworn officers, costing thousands of dollars.

Holmes VMRC Investigation

WTVR

Virginia Police Benevolent Association Spokesperson Rich Goszka

Rich Goszka, a spokesperson for the association, shared paperwork with CBS 6 showing the purchase of Dodge Durangos going to Specialist/Agency Transporation Officer Jeremy Toth and Assistant Commissioner John Cosgrove.

Advertisement

Goszka worked with the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries for years.

“They’re supposed to provide law enforcement services by the Marine Police, rather than being used for civilian use, which takes away from services from the taxpayers,” Goszka said. “We’re going to expose whatever corruption is out there. Because that’s just the right thing to do.”

“This external complaint is currently being investigated by the Office of the State Inspector General. We cannot comment on this as it involves an administrative investigation, but we would like to state that the purchasing of vehicles at VMRC is done in complete compliance with the Department of General Services guidelines and that we are always receptive and cooperative with any outside inquiries into how VMRC operates in our administrative functions. VMRC operates in complete transparency as a state agency. We would direct you to the Office of the State Inspector General if you would like further information regarding this external complaint,” Widgeon said in an email.

The Attorney General’s Office told CBS 6 it is not commenting on the letter at this time.

Holmes VMRC Investigation

WTVR

Advertisement
Chesapeake Bay

Cortez expressed concerns to CBS 6 about a decreased number of hours spent inspecting and enforceming menhaden fishing regulations.

Menhaden is considered a vital resource to the Chesapeake Bay’s ecosystem.

According to VMRC, the following hours spent on menhaden enforcement and inspections conducted are as follows:

  • 2015: 44.5 hours, 194 inspections
  • 2016: 60.5 hours, 53 inspections
  • 2017: 33.5 hours, 165 inspections
  • 2018: 49.5 hours, 174 inspections
  • 2019: 45.5 hours, 307 inspections
  • 2020: 82.0 hours, 221 inspections
  • 2021: 106 hours, 356 inspections
  • 2022: 52.5 hours, 575 inspections
  • 2023: 30.0 hours, 151 inspections

“It is worth noting that since 2015, with over 2,000 inspections having been conducted on the menhaden fishery in Virginia, no state fisheries violations have been found,” Widgeon wrote.
Last year, Chesapeake Legal Alliance (CLA), on behalf of the Southern Maryland Recreational Fishing Organization, filed a suit challenging the VMRC, saying the group allowed overfishing of menhaden.

Last November, a motion made in Richmond City Circuit Court required VMRC to comply with Virginia fisheries law “to rely on the best available science to set responsible menhaden harvests and avoid acting solely to protect the economic interests of a single commercial entity,” according to CLA.

According to a study on osprey and its ties to menhaden, by Dr. Bryan D. Watts, Director of the Center for Conservation Biology at William and Mary, “menhaden harvest policy has become a political mind field with special interests on all sides.”

Advertisement

A study by Phil Zalesak, the President of South Maryland Recreational Fishing Organization, says “the latest scientific data indicates that there are insufficient Atlantic menhaden in Virginia waters during the Atlantic menhaden reduction fishing season to sustain life for fish and birds dependent on Atlantic menhaden for their survival.”

“Although the statement that ‘Atlantic menhaden are no overfished and overfishing is not occurring’ may apply to the Atlantic Coast,’ it does not apply to the Chesapeake Bay,” Zalesak wrote.

Widgeon told CBS 6’s Zalesak’s study is not a peer-reviewed study.

“The most recent Atlantic menhaden stock ecological assessment and update showed that the stock was not overfished and not undergoing overfishing,” Widgeon wrote, citing data from 2020 and 2022. “THE ASMFC has discussed a Chesapeake-Bay specific stock assessment to recommend a scientifically supported Chesapeake Bay Cap but has prioritized further refining the ecological reference points model in the next benchmark stock assessment, as this represents the best available science for the coastwide Atlantic menhaden stock. With the lack of Chesapeake Bay-specific assessment and no concreate evidence that localized depletion is occurring in the Bay, ASMFC and the VMRC continue to maintain Chesapeake Bay Cap as a precautionary conservation measure to protect Chesapeake Bay nursery grounds,” Widgeon wrote.

Originally reported by the Virginia Mercury, Virginia lawmakers recently delayed deciding on conducting a study on if menhaden in the Chesapeake Bay are declining or not.

Advertisement

Cortez also shared concerns about several board members having special interests and not recusing themselves in cases where their businesses may benefit from commission decisions.

Associate Commissioner A.J. Erskine joined Cowart Seafood Corporation and Bevans Oyster Company in 2005 to develop oyster aquaculture programs, according to VMRC. Associate Commissioner Lynn Kellum is the President of Ampro Shipyard & Diesel.

“While the Code of Virginia does not spell out circumstances that a board member must recuse themselves in, we have full confidence that Associate Commissioners will and have recused themselves from participating in regulatory processes when they have a reasonable conflict of interest in-line with all ethical considerations. Associate Commissioners actively consult attorneys versed in conflict of interest and take all steps prudent to avoiding to avoiding a conflict of interest in their duties. We expect and are confident that Associate Commissioners operate in full transparency during commission meetings,” Widgeon wrote to CBS 6.

Depend on CBS 6 News and WTVR.com for in-depth coverage of this important story. Anyone with more information can email newstips@wtvr.com to send a tip.

Advertisement

Every day CBS 6 is Giving You A Voice. Share your voice with the CBS 6 Newsroomvia email hereor click here to submit a tip. You can also leave a message by calling 804-254-3672. Be sure to leave your name, phone number and detailed description of your story idea.





Source link

Virginia

In rural Virginia, excitement and dread grows over Democrats’ redistricting referendum

Published

on

In rural Virginia, excitement and dread grows over Democrats’ redistricting referendum


LOUISA, Va. — Michael Shull never imagined that a Democrat from the wealthy suburbs of Washington would represent his community in Congress. His corner of Virginia, with its sprawling farms and winding country roads, has been electing Republicans for more than three decades.

Then came an unusual nationwide redistricting battle, with Democrats and Republicans redrawing congressional lines to boost their chances in November’s midterm elections. Virginia could be next as voters consider a new map that would pair conservative rural areas with liberal suburbs, diluting Republicans’ electoral clout.

“Politicians should be elected to be their people’s voice,” said Shull, a Republican member of Augusta County’s board of supervisors. “Not their party’s voice.”

The vote on the constitutional amendment is on April 21, and early balloting has begun. If voters pass the referendum and it survives a court challenge, Shull’s area within the county would be split between the 7th and 9th Congressional Districts. While the 9th District would be the state’s lone Republican stronghold, the 7th District would resemble a lobster with the long tail beginning in Democrat-dominated Arlington and two claws reaching south into rural communities.

Advertisement

Congressional districts are usually redrawn once a decade, but President Donald Trump started a chain reaction last year by encouraging Texas Republicans to devise a new map to help the party in November. After a cascade of redistricting efforts, Republicans believe they can win a combined nine more U.S. House seats in Texas, Missouri, North Carolina and Ohio, while Democrats think they can win a total of six more seats in California and Utah. Virginia could give Democrats an extra four seats — enough to overturn the GOP’s slim majority, at least as things stand now.

“It’s about making sure that we fight back to what Trump’s done,” said U.S. Rep. Don Beyer, D-Va., He said the party needs to persuade voters that the referendum is “not about embracing gerrymandering.”

“I feel optimistic, but it’s close,” he said.

A print edition of the Goochland Gazette, with a front page story on the Virginia redistricting referendum, lies on a table at GG’s Pizza as members of the Goochland Democratic Committee Jen Strozier, Doug Mock, Chris Svoboda, Richard Grebe and Judi Sheppard hold a lunch meeting on future get-out-the-vote efforts, Thursday, April 2, 2026, in Maiden, Va. Credit: AP/Julia Demaree Nikhinson

A rural-urban divide

The referendum comes at a moment when Virginia Democrats have tried to make up ground in rural areas. Last year, Democrat Abigail Spanberger campaigned for governor in oyster towns and agrarian hamlets to engage with more conservative voters. Before that winning campaign, she had represented a congressional district that mixed city suburbs, exurbs and adjacent rural communities.

Advertisement

“Anyone who’s doing their job will be responsive to the communities that they seek to represent,” Spanberger said.

But her results were mixed. In counties where fewer people lived in rural areas, she outperformed Democrat Kamala Harris’ Virginia showing in the 2024 presidential race by an average of 6 percentage points or 7 percentage points. In more rural counties, Spanberger gained about 2 percentage points to 4 percentage points.

Democrat Anthony Flaccavento, former congressional candidate and co-founder of the nonprofit Rural Urban Bridge Initiative, is torn over the referendum.

Members of the Goochland Democratic Committee Jen Strozier, Doug Mock,...

Members of the Goochland Democratic Committee Jen Strozier, Doug Mock, Chris Svoboda, Richard Grebe and Judi Sheppard hold a lunch meeting on future get-out-the-vote efforts for the Virginia redistricting referendum, Thursday, April 2, 2026, at GG’s Pizza in Maiden, Va. Credit: AP/Julia Demaree Nikhinson

“At some level, it feels like kicking the can down the road -– which is something that my party has done for a long time –- when it comes to winning back rural and working-class voters,” Flaccavento said.

A welcome change for some

Democrats in rural areas who are tired of being outnumbered by their Republican neighbors are embracing the redistricting plan.

Advertisement

“Fight Back, Vote Yes,” said a sign at a No Kings protest in Louisa County. A second said, “Vote Yes. Stop ICE. No Kings.”

State Del. Dan Helmer, who helped spearhead the redistricting effort, greeted protesters and spoke to the cheering crowd. Helmer is now one of at least four Democrats running in the 7th District.

Helmer said Republicans “think that in red areas like Louisa and in rural areas, that people don’t know what’s going on. But I’m looking around right now, I see strong, proud patriots who know exactly what is going on, who know that we have an aspiring dictator who is trying to take away our democracy.”

Jennifer Lee, who has lived in Louisa for 33 years, said she was eager to support the new district lines. Lee said she felt Republicans were perpetuating a double standard, falsely claiming the 2020 presidential election won by Democrat Joe Biden was stolen from Trump but accepting his push to eliminate Democratic seats through gerrymandering.

“That’s their slogan, right? ‘Stop the steal,’” Lee said. “But they started ‘the steal.’ They’re stealing the seats now in all these districts.”

Advertisement

Democrats see a fight for survival

At a town hall hosted by Democrats at a rural Goochland County recreation center, voters nibbled on finger foods and passed around bottled water as they debated whether redistricting violated some kind of moral code.

“I’m sorry, morality just goes out the door right now. We have to do what it takes for us to survive,” said Bruce Silverman, a local nephrologist. He was voting “yes.”

At one point, Roberta Thacker-Oliver stood up to talk. She votes in the rural 9th District, which would become even more Republican with the new map.

“In the redistricting, the 9th is going to become bigger and redder,” she said, adding, “I need to know what to tell my community about why they need to take one for the team.”

“What do we tell them?” she said.

Advertisement

_



Source link

Continue Reading

Virginia

#17 Irish Fall at #4 Virginia, 4-1

Published

on

#17 Irish Fall at #4 Virginia, 4-1


PDF Box

#17 Notre Dame (19-5, 8-3) – 1 | #4 Virginia (18-3, 10-1) – 4

DOUBLES – 3, 2
1. Dominko/Gregg (ND) vs. #5 Dahlberg/Dietrich (UVA), 2-4, 4-4, 5-4, 6-5, unfinished
2. Rice/Brockett (UVA) def. #47 Llorens Saracho/Nad (ND), 7-5
3. Santamarta/Kim (UVA) def. Lee/Patrick (ND), 6-0 

SINGLES – 2, 4, 6
1. #2 Dylan Dietrich (UVA) def. #15 Sebastian Dominko (ND), 6-2, 2-6, 6-2
2. #14 Keegan Rice (UVA) def. #72 Perry Gregg (ND), 6-3, 6-3
3. #40 Andres Santamarta Roig (UVA) vs. Giuseppe Cerasuolo (ND), 6-3, 6-5, unfinished
4. Peter Nad (ND) def. #102 Jangjun Kim (UVA), 1-6, 6-1, 6-3
5. Kyran Magimay (ND) vs. Stiles Brockett (UVA), 6-1, 5-7, 1-1, unfinished
6. Douglas Yaffa (UVA) def. Luis Llorens Saracho (ND), 6-3, 0-6, 6-1

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Virginia

Virginia sees 33,000 ACA enrollment drop since subsidies expired, more likely on the way

Published

on

Virginia sees 33,000 ACA enrollment drop since subsidies expired, more likely on the way


As Virginians, and Americans nationwide, face premium spikes in the Affordable Care Act marketplace after Congress failed to renew subsidies, many are weighing the cost of coverage against paying rent or mortgages, making car payments or paying for public transit, and buying groceries.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending