Connect with us

Virginia

Why retired officer says Marine Police guarding the Chesapeake Bay are being ‘wasteful’

Published

on

Why retired officer says Marine Police guarding the Chesapeake Bay are being ‘wasteful’


RICHMOND, Va. — Andrew Cortez cares deeply about the Chesapeake Bay.

“The Chesapeake Bay is our natural heritage,” Cortez said. “A healthy bay helps everyone.”

The retired law enforcement officer was an investigator for 36 years, working to keep the Chesapeake in check with different agencies as a special agent with U.S. Fish and Wildlife.

He now has concerns about the group meant to do just that: the Virginia Marine Resources Commission, which oversees Virginia Marine Police.

Advertisement

“One of the things that really struck me is the amount of money they’re spending on what I would consider to be toys, unnecessary squandering of public money,” Cortez said.

WTVR

Andrew Cortez, retired law special agent with U.S. Fish and Wildlife

He’s talking about the recent purchase of a 2024 Pathfinder, a boat commonly used for fishing, costing $183,529.16.

Documents he received through a Freedom of Information Act Request, which he shared with CBS 6, show the purchase was made on March 5. The paperwork said it would be needed by April 4, 2024.

“They’ve got these rocket launchers; they’re sort of a holder for rods. For fishing rods,” Cortez said. “And it’s got the full fisherman package on it. It’s not something that would be used for law enforcement or for fisheries research.”

Advertisement

VRMC told CBS 6 that the vessel was purchased through the competitive bidding process in compliance with all state laws and policies.

“This vessel will be deployed in the Middle Area Law Enforcement Region for the Virginia Marine Police as a daily patrol vessel to enforce Virginia fishing and safe boating laws, as well as search and rescue operations. It has not been deployed in the field for law enforcement use yet because we are in the process of up-fitting it with law enforcement specific equipment (i.e. blue lights, siren, overt police markings),” Zachary Widgeon, VMRC’s Director of Communications sent CBS 6 in an email statement.

Holmes VMRC Investigation

WTVR

Andrew Cortez and CBS 6 reporter Elizabeth Holmes

Widgeon said the fishing rod holders will be removed, along with recreational fishing features that do not have a function for law enforcement patrol.

“Any attached fishing rod holders or live wells are standard on these models when they are delivered to the dealership before sale and there is no avenue for buyers to purchase these hulls without this equipment pre-installed. Fiberglass hull vessels are not custom built for each buyer and are adapted and upfitted from a pre-formed model to adapt them to law enforcement-specific needs and uses,” Widgeon continued in the email.

Advertisement

The response goes on to say: “This 2024 Pathfinder met the Statement of Need at a price that was reasonable in line with industry standards, superfluous features that do not affect its usage as a law enforcement patrol vessel are not relevant or considered in the purchasing process.”

“This is wasteful for an agency with a budget about the size of the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts,” Cortez said.

That’s not the only thing Cortez is concerned about.

There’s also been a drop in VMRC-related arrests and subsequent convictions.

Between 2017 and 2018, there were 1,202 arrests and 988 convictions, according to Virginia Marine Police Arrests/Convictions data.

Advertisement

Between 2021 and 2022, there were 667 arrests and 533 convictions.

Based on the numbers, Cortez thinks that’s far too few.

“Their conviction rate is 73 percent, which is dismal,” Cortez said. “In wildlife law enforcement, marine law enforcement, it should be in the high 90s, because you’re catching people in the act.”

Holmes VMRC Investigation

WTVR

Widgeon said in an email that conviction and arrest numbers have fluctuated in the time frame comparing 2017-2018 and 2021-2022.

Advertisement

“The disparity in total numbers between the 2017-2018 and 2021-2022 period comes from three categories: saltwater reactional license violations, Fisherman Identification Program (FIP) violations, and miscellaneous law enforcement (i.e. non-conservation violations, traffic, etc.),” the email reads.

Widgeon said the shift away from focusing on non-conservation violations, traffic offenses, recreational license violations, and FIP violations is based on an intentional shift in the way that the Virginia Marine Police leadership focused the patrol and enforcement efforts of officers.

“The Virginia Marine Police are the only law enforcement agency whose main charge is protecting Virginian’s marine resources and tidal waters, and so we should focus our efforts on that charge,” Widgeon said.

Widgeon said VMRC is giving officers more discretion in how they enforce the law.

“I have friends still in the agency,” Cortez said. “They tell me that about six officers write half the tickets. That’s kind of lopsided.”

Advertisement

Cortez isn’t the only one challenging the VMRC’s practices.

In April, the Virginia Police Benevolent Association sent a letter to the attorney general’s office, claiming Marine Police Officers were illegally recorded while in the workplace.

It also claimed several “police package” Dodge Durangos that were said to be used for “agency police usage” were going to non-sworn officers, costing thousands of dollars.

Holmes VMRC Investigation

WTVR

Virginia Police Benevolent Association Spokesperson Rich Goszka

Rich Goszka, a spokesperson for the association, shared paperwork with CBS 6 showing the purchase of Dodge Durangos going to Specialist/Agency Transporation Officer Jeremy Toth and Assistant Commissioner John Cosgrove.

Advertisement

Goszka worked with the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries for years.

“They’re supposed to provide law enforcement services by the Marine Police, rather than being used for civilian use, which takes away from services from the taxpayers,” Goszka said. “We’re going to expose whatever corruption is out there. Because that’s just the right thing to do.”

“This external complaint is currently being investigated by the Office of the State Inspector General. We cannot comment on this as it involves an administrative investigation, but we would like to state that the purchasing of vehicles at VMRC is done in complete compliance with the Department of General Services guidelines and that we are always receptive and cooperative with any outside inquiries into how VMRC operates in our administrative functions. VMRC operates in complete transparency as a state agency. We would direct you to the Office of the State Inspector General if you would like further information regarding this external complaint,” Widgeon said in an email.

The Attorney General’s Office told CBS 6 it is not commenting on the letter at this time.

Holmes VMRC Investigation

WTVR

Advertisement
Chesapeake Bay

Cortez expressed concerns to CBS 6 about a decreased number of hours spent inspecting and enforceming menhaden fishing regulations.

Menhaden is considered a vital resource to the Chesapeake Bay’s ecosystem.

According to VMRC, the following hours spent on menhaden enforcement and inspections conducted are as follows:

  • 2015: 44.5 hours, 194 inspections
  • 2016: 60.5 hours, 53 inspections
  • 2017: 33.5 hours, 165 inspections
  • 2018: 49.5 hours, 174 inspections
  • 2019: 45.5 hours, 307 inspections
  • 2020: 82.0 hours, 221 inspections
  • 2021: 106 hours, 356 inspections
  • 2022: 52.5 hours, 575 inspections
  • 2023: 30.0 hours, 151 inspections

“It is worth noting that since 2015, with over 2,000 inspections having been conducted on the menhaden fishery in Virginia, no state fisheries violations have been found,” Widgeon wrote.
Last year, Chesapeake Legal Alliance (CLA), on behalf of the Southern Maryland Recreational Fishing Organization, filed a suit challenging the VMRC, saying the group allowed overfishing of menhaden.

Last November, a motion made in Richmond City Circuit Court required VMRC to comply with Virginia fisheries law “to rely on the best available science to set responsible menhaden harvests and avoid acting solely to protect the economic interests of a single commercial entity,” according to CLA.

According to a study on osprey and its ties to menhaden, by Dr. Bryan D. Watts, Director of the Center for Conservation Biology at William and Mary, “menhaden harvest policy has become a political mind field with special interests on all sides.”

Advertisement

A study by Phil Zalesak, the President of South Maryland Recreational Fishing Organization, says “the latest scientific data indicates that there are insufficient Atlantic menhaden in Virginia waters during the Atlantic menhaden reduction fishing season to sustain life for fish and birds dependent on Atlantic menhaden for their survival.”

“Although the statement that ‘Atlantic menhaden are no overfished and overfishing is not occurring’ may apply to the Atlantic Coast,’ it does not apply to the Chesapeake Bay,” Zalesak wrote.

Widgeon told CBS 6’s Zalesak’s study is not a peer-reviewed study.

“The most recent Atlantic menhaden stock ecological assessment and update showed that the stock was not overfished and not undergoing overfishing,” Widgeon wrote, citing data from 2020 and 2022. “THE ASMFC has discussed a Chesapeake-Bay specific stock assessment to recommend a scientifically supported Chesapeake Bay Cap but has prioritized further refining the ecological reference points model in the next benchmark stock assessment, as this represents the best available science for the coastwide Atlantic menhaden stock. With the lack of Chesapeake Bay-specific assessment and no concreate evidence that localized depletion is occurring in the Bay, ASMFC and the VMRC continue to maintain Chesapeake Bay Cap as a precautionary conservation measure to protect Chesapeake Bay nursery grounds,” Widgeon wrote.

Originally reported by the Virginia Mercury, Virginia lawmakers recently delayed deciding on conducting a study on if menhaden in the Chesapeake Bay are declining or not.

Advertisement

Cortez also shared concerns about several board members having special interests and not recusing themselves in cases where their businesses may benefit from commission decisions.

Associate Commissioner A.J. Erskine joined Cowart Seafood Corporation and Bevans Oyster Company in 2005 to develop oyster aquaculture programs, according to VMRC. Associate Commissioner Lynn Kellum is the President of Ampro Shipyard & Diesel.

“While the Code of Virginia does not spell out circumstances that a board member must recuse themselves in, we have full confidence that Associate Commissioners will and have recused themselves from participating in regulatory processes when they have a reasonable conflict of interest in-line with all ethical considerations. Associate Commissioners actively consult attorneys versed in conflict of interest and take all steps prudent to avoiding to avoiding a conflict of interest in their duties. We expect and are confident that Associate Commissioners operate in full transparency during commission meetings,” Widgeon wrote to CBS 6.

Depend on CBS 6 News and WTVR.com for in-depth coverage of this important story. Anyone with more information can email newstips@wtvr.com to send a tip.

Advertisement

Every day CBS 6 is Giving You A Voice. Share your voice with the CBS 6 Newsroomvia email hereor click here to submit a tip. You can also leave a message by calling 804-254-3672. Be sure to leave your name, phone number and detailed description of your story idea.





Source link

Virginia

One Strength, One Weakness of Virginia Tech Men’s Basketball’s 2026-27 Roster

Published

on

One Strength, One Weakness of Virginia Tech Men’s Basketball’s 2026-27 Roster


For Virginia Tech men’s basketball, the 2026-27 season is still around five months away — the roster itself, though, looks like a recipe that is nearly done cooking. Here’s a look at what I think is one strength and one weakness of the 2026-27 roster:

Advertisement

Strength: In the aggregate, there’s a lot of depth.

Last year’s Virginia Tech unit struggled to find much stability, in large part because of injuries that chipped away at its depth for extended stretches.

Advertisement

Forward Tobi Lawal missed nine games with an ankle injury, while guard Tyler Johnson was sidelined for the first 15 ACC games with a lower-body injury. German big Antonio Dorn also dealt with a nagging back injury that limited his effectiveness in the latter two-thirds of the season. Those injuries forced the Hokies to shuffle roles, lean heavily on a smaller group of contributors and operate with a rotation that felt further from a true nine- or 10-man group than desired.

That lack of depth made it difficult for Virginia Tech to sustain consistency over the course of ACC play. When injuries mounted, the Hokies didn’t always have enough proven options to absorb those losses without noticeable drop-off.

Virginia Tech, though, should have more depth at its disposal this coming season. The Hokies should be able to run a nine-man lineup this season — returning guards Ben Hammond and Tyler Johnson, forwards Amani Hansberry and Sin’Cere Jones, transfer guards Ethan Copeland (Stetson), Isaiah Elohim (Florida Atlantic) and Jaylen Curry (Oklahoma State), transfer forward Kuol Atak (Oklahoma) and transfer big Miles Heide (San Diego State).

Weakness: Virginia Tech may not have a takeover option.

Advertisement

The biggest question with Virginia Tech’s roster may not be whether the Hokies have enough capable scorers, but whether they have a clear-cut player who can consistently take over games when the offense stalls.

Advertisement

Hammond averaged a team-high 14.9 points per game in league play last season, which is certainly strong enough to suggest he can be Virginia Tech’s primary offensive option. The next step is whether he can ascend from productive ACC scorer to legitimate All-ACC caliber guard. I think that jump is within reach, but for now, it remains more of a projection than a certainty.

At the moment, Virginia Tech does not have a definitively proven player who feels like a nightly threat to pour in 25 or so points. The Hokies have players who can score, and they should have more balance than they did last season, but balance is different from having a go-to takeover scorer.

Then again, that has been true for Virginia Tech for several years. Outside of streaky stretches from Avdalas, the Hokies have not consistently had that kind of explosive offensive centerpiece. If Hammond reaches another level, this weakness could soften quickly.

Add us as a preferred source on Google



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Virginia

Virginia Lottery Mega Millions, Pick 3 Night results for June 5, 2026

Published

on

Virginia Lottery Mega Millions, Pick 3 Night results for June 5, 2026


play

The Virginia Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.

Advertisement

Here’s a look at June 5, 2026, results for each game:

Mega Millions

Mega Millions drawings take place every week on Tuesday and Friday at 11 p.m.

13-30-50-52-66, Mega Ball: 02

Check Mega Millions payouts and previous drawings here.

Pick 3

DAY drawing at 1:59 p.m. NIGHT drawing at 11 p.m. each day.

Advertisement

Night: 8-2-8, FB: 2

Day: 7-2-9, FB: 2

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Pick 4

DAY drawing at 1:59 p.m. NIGHT drawing at 11 p.m. each day.

Night: 2-7-2-8, FB: 8

Advertisement

Day: 0-0-3-6, FB: 1

Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Pick 5

DAY drawing at 1:59 p.m. NIGHT drawing at 11 p.m. each day.

Night: 5-5-0-9-9, FB: 5

Day: 4-3-4-6-1, FB: 9

Advertisement

Check Pick 5 payouts and previous drawings here.

Cash Pop

Drawing times: Coffee Break 9 a.m.; Lunch Break 12 p.m.; Rush Hour 5 p.m.; Prime Time 9 p.m.; After Hours 11:59 p.m.

Coffee Break: 11

After Hours: 12

Prime Time: 02

Advertisement

Rush Hour: 07

Lunch Break: 09

Check Cash Pop payouts and previous drawings here.

Cash 5

Drawing every day at 11 p.m.

10-18-21-39-45

Advertisement

Check Cash 5 payouts and previous drawings here.

Millionaire for Life

Drawing everyday at 11:15 p.m.

06-38-51-54-55, Bonus: 05

Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Advertisement

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Center for Community Journalism (CCJ) editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Continue Reading

Virginia

Virginia man gets life in prison for double murder scheme in affair with Brazilian au pair

Published

on

Virginia man gets life in prison for double murder scheme in affair with Brazilian au pair


Brendan Banfield listens to a family impact statement ahead of the sentencing in court on Friday, June 5, 2026 in Fairfax, Va. (AP Photo/Pool)




Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending