Connect with us

Virginia

Why retired officer says Marine Police guarding the Chesapeake Bay are being ‘wasteful’

Published

on

Why retired officer says Marine Police guarding the Chesapeake Bay are being ‘wasteful’


RICHMOND, Va. — Andrew Cortez cares deeply about the Chesapeake Bay.

“The Chesapeake Bay is our natural heritage,” Cortez said. “A healthy bay helps everyone.”

The retired law enforcement officer was an investigator for 36 years, working to keep the Chesapeake in check with different agencies as a special agent with U.S. Fish and Wildlife.

He now has concerns about the group meant to do just that: the Virginia Marine Resources Commission, which oversees Virginia Marine Police.

Advertisement

“One of the things that really struck me is the amount of money they’re spending on what I would consider to be toys, unnecessary squandering of public money,” Cortez said.

WTVR

Andrew Cortez, retired law special agent with U.S. Fish and Wildlife

He’s talking about the recent purchase of a 2024 Pathfinder, a boat commonly used for fishing, costing $183,529.16.

Documents he received through a Freedom of Information Act Request, which he shared with CBS 6, show the purchase was made on March 5. The paperwork said it would be needed by April 4, 2024.

“They’ve got these rocket launchers; they’re sort of a holder for rods. For fishing rods,” Cortez said. “And it’s got the full fisherman package on it. It’s not something that would be used for law enforcement or for fisheries research.”

Advertisement

VRMC told CBS 6 that the vessel was purchased through the competitive bidding process in compliance with all state laws and policies.

“This vessel will be deployed in the Middle Area Law Enforcement Region for the Virginia Marine Police as a daily patrol vessel to enforce Virginia fishing and safe boating laws, as well as search and rescue operations. It has not been deployed in the field for law enforcement use yet because we are in the process of up-fitting it with law enforcement specific equipment (i.e. blue lights, siren, overt police markings),” Zachary Widgeon, VMRC’s Director of Communications sent CBS 6 in an email statement.

Holmes VMRC Investigation

WTVR

Andrew Cortez and CBS 6 reporter Elizabeth Holmes

Widgeon said the fishing rod holders will be removed, along with recreational fishing features that do not have a function for law enforcement patrol.

“Any attached fishing rod holders or live wells are standard on these models when they are delivered to the dealership before sale and there is no avenue for buyers to purchase these hulls without this equipment pre-installed. Fiberglass hull vessels are not custom built for each buyer and are adapted and upfitted from a pre-formed model to adapt them to law enforcement-specific needs and uses,” Widgeon continued in the email.

Advertisement

The response goes on to say: “This 2024 Pathfinder met the Statement of Need at a price that was reasonable in line with industry standards, superfluous features that do not affect its usage as a law enforcement patrol vessel are not relevant or considered in the purchasing process.”

“This is wasteful for an agency with a budget about the size of the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts,” Cortez said.

That’s not the only thing Cortez is concerned about.

There’s also been a drop in VMRC-related arrests and subsequent convictions.

Between 2017 and 2018, there were 1,202 arrests and 988 convictions, according to Virginia Marine Police Arrests/Convictions data.

Advertisement

Between 2021 and 2022, there were 667 arrests and 533 convictions.

Based on the numbers, Cortez thinks that’s far too few.

“Their conviction rate is 73 percent, which is dismal,” Cortez said. “In wildlife law enforcement, marine law enforcement, it should be in the high 90s, because you’re catching people in the act.”

Holmes VMRC Investigation

WTVR

Widgeon said in an email that conviction and arrest numbers have fluctuated in the time frame comparing 2017-2018 and 2021-2022.

Advertisement

“The disparity in total numbers between the 2017-2018 and 2021-2022 period comes from three categories: saltwater reactional license violations, Fisherman Identification Program (FIP) violations, and miscellaneous law enforcement (i.e. non-conservation violations, traffic, etc.),” the email reads.

Widgeon said the shift away from focusing on non-conservation violations, traffic offenses, recreational license violations, and FIP violations is based on an intentional shift in the way that the Virginia Marine Police leadership focused the patrol and enforcement efforts of officers.

“The Virginia Marine Police are the only law enforcement agency whose main charge is protecting Virginian’s marine resources and tidal waters, and so we should focus our efforts on that charge,” Widgeon said.

Widgeon said VMRC is giving officers more discretion in how they enforce the law.

“I have friends still in the agency,” Cortez said. “They tell me that about six officers write half the tickets. That’s kind of lopsided.”

Advertisement

Cortez isn’t the only one challenging the VMRC’s practices.

In April, the Virginia Police Benevolent Association sent a letter to the attorney general’s office, claiming Marine Police Officers were illegally recorded while in the workplace.

It also claimed several “police package” Dodge Durangos that were said to be used for “agency police usage” were going to non-sworn officers, costing thousands of dollars.

Holmes VMRC Investigation

WTVR

Virginia Police Benevolent Association Spokesperson Rich Goszka

Rich Goszka, a spokesperson for the association, shared paperwork with CBS 6 showing the purchase of Dodge Durangos going to Specialist/Agency Transporation Officer Jeremy Toth and Assistant Commissioner John Cosgrove.

Advertisement

Goszka worked with the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries for years.

“They’re supposed to provide law enforcement services by the Marine Police, rather than being used for civilian use, which takes away from services from the taxpayers,” Goszka said. “We’re going to expose whatever corruption is out there. Because that’s just the right thing to do.”

“This external complaint is currently being investigated by the Office of the State Inspector General. We cannot comment on this as it involves an administrative investigation, but we would like to state that the purchasing of vehicles at VMRC is done in complete compliance with the Department of General Services guidelines and that we are always receptive and cooperative with any outside inquiries into how VMRC operates in our administrative functions. VMRC operates in complete transparency as a state agency. We would direct you to the Office of the State Inspector General if you would like further information regarding this external complaint,” Widgeon said in an email.

The Attorney General’s Office told CBS 6 it is not commenting on the letter at this time.

Holmes VMRC Investigation

WTVR

Advertisement
Chesapeake Bay

Cortez expressed concerns to CBS 6 about a decreased number of hours spent inspecting and enforceming menhaden fishing regulations.

Menhaden is considered a vital resource to the Chesapeake Bay’s ecosystem.

According to VMRC, the following hours spent on menhaden enforcement and inspections conducted are as follows:

  • 2015: 44.5 hours, 194 inspections
  • 2016: 60.5 hours, 53 inspections
  • 2017: 33.5 hours, 165 inspections
  • 2018: 49.5 hours, 174 inspections
  • 2019: 45.5 hours, 307 inspections
  • 2020: 82.0 hours, 221 inspections
  • 2021: 106 hours, 356 inspections
  • 2022: 52.5 hours, 575 inspections
  • 2023: 30.0 hours, 151 inspections

“It is worth noting that since 2015, with over 2,000 inspections having been conducted on the menhaden fishery in Virginia, no state fisheries violations have been found,” Widgeon wrote.
Last year, Chesapeake Legal Alliance (CLA), on behalf of the Southern Maryland Recreational Fishing Organization, filed a suit challenging the VMRC, saying the group allowed overfishing of menhaden.

Last November, a motion made in Richmond City Circuit Court required VMRC to comply with Virginia fisheries law “to rely on the best available science to set responsible menhaden harvests and avoid acting solely to protect the economic interests of a single commercial entity,” according to CLA.

According to a study on osprey and its ties to menhaden, by Dr. Bryan D. Watts, Director of the Center for Conservation Biology at William and Mary, “menhaden harvest policy has become a political mind field with special interests on all sides.”

Advertisement

A study by Phil Zalesak, the President of South Maryland Recreational Fishing Organization, says “the latest scientific data indicates that there are insufficient Atlantic menhaden in Virginia waters during the Atlantic menhaden reduction fishing season to sustain life for fish and birds dependent on Atlantic menhaden for their survival.”

“Although the statement that ‘Atlantic menhaden are no overfished and overfishing is not occurring’ may apply to the Atlantic Coast,’ it does not apply to the Chesapeake Bay,” Zalesak wrote.

Widgeon told CBS 6’s Zalesak’s study is not a peer-reviewed study.

“The most recent Atlantic menhaden stock ecological assessment and update showed that the stock was not overfished and not undergoing overfishing,” Widgeon wrote, citing data from 2020 and 2022. “THE ASMFC has discussed a Chesapeake-Bay specific stock assessment to recommend a scientifically supported Chesapeake Bay Cap but has prioritized further refining the ecological reference points model in the next benchmark stock assessment, as this represents the best available science for the coastwide Atlantic menhaden stock. With the lack of Chesapeake Bay-specific assessment and no concreate evidence that localized depletion is occurring in the Bay, ASMFC and the VMRC continue to maintain Chesapeake Bay Cap as a precautionary conservation measure to protect Chesapeake Bay nursery grounds,” Widgeon wrote.

Originally reported by the Virginia Mercury, Virginia lawmakers recently delayed deciding on conducting a study on if menhaden in the Chesapeake Bay are declining or not.

Advertisement

Cortez also shared concerns about several board members having special interests and not recusing themselves in cases where their businesses may benefit from commission decisions.

Associate Commissioner A.J. Erskine joined Cowart Seafood Corporation and Bevans Oyster Company in 2005 to develop oyster aquaculture programs, according to VMRC. Associate Commissioner Lynn Kellum is the President of Ampro Shipyard & Diesel.

“While the Code of Virginia does not spell out circumstances that a board member must recuse themselves in, we have full confidence that Associate Commissioners will and have recused themselves from participating in regulatory processes when they have a reasonable conflict of interest in-line with all ethical considerations. Associate Commissioners actively consult attorneys versed in conflict of interest and take all steps prudent to avoiding to avoiding a conflict of interest in their duties. We expect and are confident that Associate Commissioners operate in full transparency during commission meetings,” Widgeon wrote to CBS 6.

Depend on CBS 6 News and WTVR.com for in-depth coverage of this important story. Anyone with more information can email newstips@wtvr.com to send a tip.

Advertisement

Every day CBS 6 is Giving You A Voice. Share your voice with the CBS 6 Newsroomvia email hereor click here to submit a tip. You can also leave a message by calling 804-254-3672. Be sure to leave your name, phone number and detailed description of your story idea.





Source link

Virginia

New Virginia law banning `assault firearms’ prompts quick lawsuits from gun-rights groups

Published

on

New Virginia law banning `assault firearms’ prompts quick lawsuits from gun-rights groups


Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger has signed legislation banning the sale and manufacture of certain semi-automatic firearms, prompting immediate lawsuits from gun-rights groups.

The limits on “ assault firearms,” as they are described by the legislation, are among two dozen new restrictions and regulations on guns enacted by the Democratic governor in her first few months in office. That marks a sharp policy reversal from her Republican predecessor, who had vetoed many similar measures.

“Firearms designed to inflict maximum casualties do not belong on our streets,” Spanberger said in a statement Friday. “We are taking this step to protect families and support the law enforcement officers who work every day to keep our communities safe.”

The new gun restrictions move Virginia closer to the likes of California, Illinois and New York, which similarly have full Democratic control of their legislatures and governors’ offices. They also highlight a continued national divide on gun policy, as various Republican-led states have taken steps to relax firearm restrictions that they describe as an infringement on Second Amendment rights.

Advertisement

A dozen states now target semi-automatic firearms

The new Virginia law, which takes effect July 1, will make it a misdemeanor, punishable by up to a year in jail and a $2,500 fine, for people to buy, sell, transfer, import or manufacture an “assault firearm.”

The measure defines that term to include semi-automatic rifles or pistols with a magazine capacity of more than 15 rounds. It also includes firearms with other characteristics, such as rifles capable of accepting a detachable magazine that have a second handgrip or a collapsible stock. The prohibition also applies to magazines capable of holding more than 15 rounds. For most people, there’s no penalty for merely possessing such weapons.

Eleven other states and Washington, D.C., already have laws prohibiting the sale an manufacture of certain semi-automatic firearms, though the details vary. Hawaii, for example, prohibits certain semi-automatic pistols and high-capacity magazines, but not semi-automatic rifles.

Gun-rights groups challenge the Virginia law

Legal challenges came swiftly after Spanberger signed the legislation Thursday. The National Rifle Association, joined by other groups, sued in both federal and state court, asserting violations of the right to bear arms.

“The firearms and magazines banned in this law aren’t bizarre and unusual outliers, they’re among the most commonly owned guns and magazines in the country,” said Adam Kraut, executive director of the Second Amendment Foundation, which joined the NRA in the federal lawsuit. “They’re owned in the tens of millions by peaceable Americans who use them overwhelmingly lawfully.”

Advertisement

The U.S. Department of Justice also vowed to sue to block the Virginia law from being enforced.

The Virginia measure would “infringe on the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens to enjoy and use AR-15 rifles for lawful purposes by making it a crime to purchase and sell them,” Harmeet Dhillon, assistant attorney general for the department’s civil rights division, wrote in an April letter to Spanberger.

Courts have upheld other bans on semi-automatic weapons

So far, laws restricting certain semi-automatic firearms generally have been upheld, including by the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, which covers Virginia, Maryland and several additional states.

That appellate court twice upheld a Maryland law banning dozens of types of semi-automatic weapons, describing them a 2024 ruling as “military-style weapons” that are ill-suited for self-defense. It concluded that “the Maryland law fits comfortably within our nation’s tradition of firearms regulation.”

The U.S. Supreme Court last year declined to hear a challenge in that Maryland case. But gun-rights advocates remain hopeful of a different outcome in future cases, noting that three conservative justices on the nine-member court disagreed with the decision and a fourth expressed skepticism that such firearm bans are constitutional.

Advertisement

A change in governor leads to a change in laws

Former Republican Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin vetoed legislation each of the past two years that would have prohibited the sale of certain semi-automatic firearms.

But Youngkin’s term ended in January, and he was succeeded by Spanberger. The transition presented a huge opportunity for advocates of gun restrictions, who already had support within the Democratic-led Legislature.

Spanberger, a former CIA officer and U.S. House member, had previously been a volunteer with Moms Demand Action, a group founded after a shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut claimed the lives of 26 people in 2012. The group lists 20% of the Democrats in the Virginia House as its past volunteers.

“The fact that a former Moms Demand Action volunteer just signed an assault weapons ban in the home state of the NRA speaks volumes about how dramatically the political calculus around gun safety has shifted,” said John Feinblatt, president of Everytown for Gun Safety, the umbrella organization for Moms Demand Action..

Republican states act to expand gun rights

While Virginia tightens gun regulations, many Republican-led states have been expanding gun rights.

Advertisement

On the same day Spanberger signed the semi-automatic firearm restrictions, Missouri’s Republican-led Legislature gave final approval to legislation creating a school ranger program that could let trained volunteers carry firearms in schools.

A law signed by Spanberger last month raised the age to purchase a handgun in Virginia from 18 to 21. By contrast, Republican West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey signed a law last month lowering the age from 21 to 18 for carrying concealed guns without a state permit.

Yet another law signed by Spanberger last month opens new grounds for lawsuits against the firearms industry. That came shortly after Republican Utah Gov. Spencer Cox signed a law limiting liability lawsuits against the firearms industry.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Virginia

West Virginia American Water opens new training facility in Nitro – WV MetroNews

Published

on

West Virginia American Water opens new training facility in Nitro – WV MetroNews


NITRO, W.Va. –Employees at West Virginia American Water, both new and experienced, now have the opportunity to receive training in Nitro that includes classroom instruction and hands-on learning.

Main part of the training facility which will be used as a classroom

Company officials, local officials, and community members gathered Friday afternoon for a ribbon-cutting ceremony at the company’s new distribution training facility in Nitro.

The facility, located at 135 Main Avenue, features modern classrooms and hands-on training environments in Nitro.

Scott Wyman, president of West Virginia American Water, said the opening was a very proud moment for him.

Advertisement

“Great facility, great timing, great location for us, so very proud,” Wyman said.

The company purchased the building from its previous owners and worked with the city of Nitro to obtain permits and complete construction to refurbish the building.

Wyman said the facility will benefit both current employees and future workers at West Virginia American Water.

“Not only for our employees, but we have some interns coming through the company now, just to show them what happens in the water business, be a great opportunity bring them through here, see the kind of behind the scenes how it works, and see maybe water might be something they want to pursue,” he said.

Nitro city councilman Joe Murphy said he hopes the facility also reaches students at Nitro High School.

Advertisement

“Having companies like this offer training services right near our school is awesome,” Murphy said. “So, I’m hoping they develop a great relationship with the school and there going to go over there and help get the kids down here and get them interested into different trades, so yeah definitely excited about that.”

The safety of the company’s employees is the primary reason for establishing a training facility like this.

However, Scott Wyman said the facility is also intended to help ensure the company provides reliable water service to customers.

“In turn we also get the ability to be a little bit more efficient with our work, make sure it’s done properly, so it lasts longer, it cost a lot of money to invest in water infrastructure so we want to make sure it’s done right the first time, so that all plays into the big picture,” he said.

The company provides water to 14 million customers across 14 states and 18 military installations.

Advertisement

Murphy said it is great to have a facility like this, especially because of its focus on safety.

Hands-on environment in the facility

“Safety and training of any business or entity is vital, so having them invest in the training, and also having them do it here in the City of Nitro, is great for the city of Nitro,” he said.

Wyman said it was amazing to have the support of the city of Nitro because of the relationship they have built over the years.

“Mayor Casebolt, his staff, the city of Nitro in total, wonderful to work with, we not only appreciate for what they helped us get done here, but really more importantly for the partnership that we’ve had with them over the years, whether it was through the water stuff we worked on, whether it was for the water acquisition we just did, didn’t really matter, the city has always been a good partner,” he said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Virginia

Virginia Lottery Mega Millions, Pick 3 Night results for May 15, 2026

Published

on

Virginia Lottery Mega Millions, Pick 3 Night results for May 15, 2026


play

The Virginia Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.

Advertisement

Here’s a look at May 15, 2026, results for each game:

Mega Millions

Mega Millions drawings take place every week on Tuesday and Friday at 11 p.m.

17-23-25-52-61, Mega Ball: 03

Check Mega Millions payouts and previous drawings here.

Pick 3

DAY drawing at 1:59 p.m. NIGHT drawing at 11 p.m. each day.

Advertisement

Night: 2-3-9, FB: 0

Day: 3-9-3, FB: 1

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Pick 4

DAY drawing at 1:59 p.m. NIGHT drawing at 11 p.m. each day.

Night: 3-8-8-4, FB: 9

Advertisement

Day: 0-7-6-9, FB: 4

Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Pick 5

DAY drawing at 1:59 p.m. NIGHT drawing at 11 p.m. each day.

Night: 3-1-1-9-3, FB: 6

Day: 4-8-6-8-1, FB: 4

Advertisement

Check Pick 5 payouts and previous drawings here.

Cash Pop

Drawing times: Coffee Break 9 a.m.; Lunch Break 12 p.m.; Rush Hour 5 p.m.; Prime Time 9 p.m.; After Hours 11:59 p.m.

Coffee Break: 13

After Hours: 04

Prime Time: 12

Advertisement

Rush Hour: 03

Lunch Break: 11

Check Cash Pop payouts and previous drawings here.

Cash 5

Drawing every day at 11 p.m.

09-15-20-34-42

Advertisement

Check Cash 5 payouts and previous drawings here.

Millionaire for Life

Drawing everyday at 11:15 p.m.

07-08-27-29-30, Bonus: 02

Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Advertisement

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Center for Community Journalism (CCJ) editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending