Connect with us

Virginia

Virginia Looking for Five-Peat: Scoring the 2025 Women's NCAA Championships Pysch Sheets

Published

on

Virginia Looking for Five-Peat: Scoring the 2025 Women's NCAA Championships Pysch Sheets


2025 Women’s NCAA Swimming and Diving Championships

The official psych sheets for women’s NCAAs came out today, and Virginia is projected to win their 5th straight NCAA title by more than 100 points. UVA is seeded to score 534 points with Texas (390.5) and Tennessee (372.5) battling it out for 2nd with less than 20 points separating them.

Stanford is expected to move up into 4th, improving from their 5th place finish last year, and Florida is falling out of the top three coming in at 5th. Michigan (6th) and Cal (9th) are also projected to improve their placements from last year, and end up in the top 10 for the first time since 2022.

These projections do not include the women’s diving events, which could make an impact in both directions moving teams up or down. The diving invites are expected to be released on Thursday, March 13th.

Thank you to Andrew Mering for compiling this information.

Advertisement

Scored Psych Sheet

Psych Points Individual Relay Scoring Individual Count Individual Swim Count Relay Entry Count
Virginia 534 334 200 27 53 5
Texas 390.5 232.5 158 22 39 5
Tennessee 372.5 224.5 148 20 37 5
Stanford 333 191 142 15 35 5
Florida 253.5 155.5 98 17 41 5
Michigan 209.5 89.5 120 11 36 5
Indiana 208.5 112.5 96 10 26 5
NC State 195 83 112 9 27 5
California 186.5 104.5 82 11 30 5
Louisville 179.5 79.5 100 10 37 5
Southern Cali 113 56 57 6 22 5
Alabama 99.5 37.5 62 4 20 4
Wisconsin 89 57 32 6 23 5
Ohio St 76 34 42 4 34 5
Georgia 66.5 42.5 24 6 24 5
Duke 39 31 8 5 7 4
UNC 26.5 8.5 18 2 18 5
Pittsburgh 26 26 0 3 11 5
Virginia Tech 23.5 13.5 10 3 8 4
Auburn 20 0 20 0 17 5
Miami (FL) 19 19 0 2 7 0
Brigham Young 17 17 0 2 3 0
LSU 12 4 8 1 16 5
Arizona 12 0 12 0 3 3
Cincinnati 12 12 0 1 2 1
Houston 11 11 0 1 6 0
Washington St. 9 9 0 1 6 0
South Carolina 7 7 0 1 18 4
Minnesota 6.5 6.5 0 1 7 0
Texas A&M 6 6 0 2 18 5
Arizona St 4 4 0 2 22 5
Nebraska 4 4 0 1 3 0
Princeton 2 2 0 1 9 3
Florida St 1 0 1 0 6 3
Liberty 1 1 0 1 6 0
Harvard 0 0 0 0 3 0
Penn 0 0 0 0 5 0
Wyoming (W) 0 0 0 0 2 0
Notre Dame 0 0 0 0 4 2
Seton Hall 0 0 0 0 3 0
Akron 0 0 0 0 3 0
UCLA 0 0 0 0 8 4
SIUC (W) 0 0 0 0 6 0
Missouri 0 0 0 0 6 3
Cal Baptist 0 0 0 0 3 0
Northwestern 0 0 0 0 5 3
Richmond 0 0 0 0 2 0
Ohio 0 0 0 0 3 0
UNC Wilmington 0 0 0 0 2 0
Nevada 0 0 0 0 3 0
SMU 0 0 0 0 3 0
Miami (Ohio) 0 0 0 0 2 0
Kentucky 0 0 0 0 5 0
Vanderbilt 0 0 0 0 2 0
Florida Int’l 0 0 0 0 1 0
UCSD 0 0 0 0 2 0
Fresno State 0 0 0 0 4 0

Points by Event & Day

200 Medley Relay 800 Free Relay Day 1 500 Freestyle 200 Individual 50 Freestyle 200 Free Relay Day 2 400 Individual 100 Butterfly 200 Freestyle 100 Breaststroke 100 Backstroke 400 Medley Relay Day 3 1650 Freestyle 200 Backstroke 100 Freestyle 200 Breaststroke 200 Butterfly 400 Free Relay
Virginia 40 40 80 21.5 26 40 40 127.5 35 20 24 27 17 40 163 15.5 20 35 25 28 40
Texas 34 32 66 20 39 0 32 91 12 29 19 18 1 30 109 34 0 11.5 1 48 30
Tennessee 26 34 60 12.5 19 16 24 71.5 18 0 26 33 15 32 124 0 17 22 29 17 32
Stanford 32 30 62 16 35 0 30 81 30 17 11 0 0 26 84 17 0 17 20 28 24
Florida 24 26 50 31 9 0 0 40 39 11 1 14 20 34 119 12 18.5 0 0 0 14
Michigan 18 28 46 16 2 3.5 28 49.5 0 0 17 2 0 12 31 5 0 25 5 14 34
Indiana 14 18 32 14 0 10 14 38 0 13 20 0 13 28 74 15 12 9 6.5 0 22
NC State 28 12 40 0 0 0 22 22 0 15 0 0 30.5 24 69.5 2 33 2.5 0 0 26
California 30 14 44 0 12 13 18 43 0 3 11 0 28 10 52 12 14 2.5 3 6 10
Louisville 12 8 20 0 0 33 34 67 0 20 0 1 0 18 39 3 0 18.5 4 0 28
Southern Cali 1 22 23 4.5 0 0 2 6.5 3 0 16 15 0 14 48 0 0 11 6.5 0 18
Alabama 22 0 22 0 0 12 26 38 0 0 0 4 6.5 8 18.5 0 0 0 15 0 6
Wisconsin 6 4 10 0 13 3.5 0 16.5 0 0 0 0 16.5 22 38.5 0 24 0 0 0 0
Ohio St 0 24 24 0 0 0 6 6 16 0 0 0 0 0 16 13 5 0 0 0 12
Georgia 0 10 10 19.5 0 0 10 29.5 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 16 0 0 0 0 4
Duke 4 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 9 0 4 13 0 3 1 17 0 0
UNC 8 0 8 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 6 2.5 6 14.5 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pittsburgh 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 14 0 12 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0
Virginia Tech 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 8.5 0 0 0 8
Auburn 10 0 10 0 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Miami (FL) 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 0 12 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0
Brigham Young 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 14 0 0
LSU 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2
Arizona 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cincinnati 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0
Houston 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0
Washington St. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0
South Carolina 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0
Minnesota 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.5 0 0 0 0 0
Texas A&M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0
Arizona St 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nebraska 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
Princeton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Florida St 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Liberty 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Harvard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Penn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wyoming (W) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Notre Dame 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Seton Hall 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Akron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
UCLA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SIUC (W) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Missouri 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cal Baptist 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Northwestern 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Richmond 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ohio 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
UNC Wilmington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nevada 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SMU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Miami (Ohio) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kentucky 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Vanderbilt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Florida Int’l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
UCSD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fresno State 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Virginia is seeded to score the most points every day and earn a perfect 200 relay points by winning every relay, with Texas (200 medley), Tennessee (800 free), Louisville (200 free), Florida (400 medley), and Michigan (400 free) looking to split the 2nd place points.

Stanford appears to have a very strong day two, looking to score 81 points, which will potentially have them in 3rd after these events. They are projected to struggle slightly on day three, only putting up 84 points which will allow Tennessee (124) to pass them and Florida (199) to close the gap.

Projected Scores by Athlete

Note: These are only the athletes who are projected to score in at least one of their individual events.

Seed Points Event 1 Time Rank Event 2 Time Rank Event 3 Time Rank
Walsh, Gretchen SR Virginia 60 50 Freestyle 20.60 1 100 Butterfly 47.35 1 100 Freestyle 45.20 1
Sims, Arabella SO Florida 54 500 Freestyle 4:31.06 2 100 Backstroke 48.97 1 200 Backstroke 1:48.28 2
Huske, Victoria JR Stanford 54 200 Individual 1:51.46 1 100 Butterfly 48.52 2 100 Freestyle 46.09 2
Walsh, Alexandra Grad Virginia 54 200 Individual 1:51.80 2 100 Breaststroke 56.85 1 200 Butterfly 1:50.43 2
Sticklen, Emma Grad Texas 52 200 Individual 1:52.42 3 100 Butterfly 49.40 3 200 Butterfly 1:49.17 1
Curzan, Claire JR Virginia 52 50 Freestyle 21.26 4 100 Backstroke 49.35 2 200 Backstroke 1:46.87 1
Spink, Camille SO Tennessee 46 50 Freestyle 21.23 3 200 Freestyle 1:42.06 5 100 Freestyle 46.25 3
Grimes, Kathryn FR Virginia 44 500 Freestyle 4:32.69 4 400 Individual 3:59.02 1 1650 Freestyle 15:53.40 9
Shackley, Leah FR NC State 44 100 Butterfly 50.33 4 100 Backstroke 50.22 6 200 Backstroke 1:48.73 3
Peplowski, Anna SR Indiana 43 500 Freestyle 4:33.86 5 200 Freestyle 1:40.69 1 100 Freestyle 47.37 9
Fuller, Josephine SR Tennessee 43 200 Individual 1:52.86 4 100 Backstroke 50.05 4 200 Backstroke 1:50.14 6
Bricker, Caroline SO Stanford 43 200 Individual 1:52.97 5 400 Individual 3:59.88 3 200 Butterfly 1:52.21 6
Bacon, Phoebe Grad Wisconsin 42 200 Individual 1:53.12 6 100 Backstroke 50.14 5 200 Backstroke 1:48.75 4
Cox, Jillian SO Texas 40 500 Freestyle 4:30.68 1 1650 Freestyle 15:30.33 1
Roghair, Aurora SR Stanford 40 500 Freestyle 4:31.63 3 200 Freestyle 1:43.13 10 1650 Freestyle 15:36.43 2
Stoll, Campbell SO Texas 39 200 Individual 1:53.37 8 400 Individual 4:03.11 7 200 Butterfly 1:51.64 3
Bell, Lucerne JR Stanford 34 200 Individual 1:54.74 16 400 Individual 4:01.70 6 200 Breaststroke 2:04.60 1
Grana, Miranda SO Indiana 34 100 Butterfly 50.80 6 100 Backstroke 50.69 9 200 Backstroke 1:50.50 7
McSharry, Mona Grad Tennessee 33 50 Freestyle 22.20 54 100 Breaststroke 57.26 2 200 Breaststroke 2:05.85 3
Canny, Aimee JR Virginia 31.5 500 Freestyle 4:35.43 12 200 Freestyle 1:42.00 4 200 Breaststroke 2:06.70 7
MOLUH, Mary-Ambre FR California 31.5 50 Freestyle 21.57 6 100 Backstroke 49.68 3 100 Freestyle 47.63 14
Weyant, Emma SR Florida 31 500 Freestyle 4:35.58 14 400 Individual 3:59.24 2 1650 Freestyle 15:53.23 8
Dennis, Julia JR Louisville 31 50 Freestyle 21.08 2 100 Freestyle 47.15 5
BALDUCCINI, STEPHANIE SO Michigan 29 50 Freestyle 22.05 40 200 Freestyle 1:41.16 2 100 Freestyle 47.33 7
Siroky, McKenzie FR Tennessee 29 100 Breaststroke 57.27 3 200 Breaststroke 2:06.57 6
Jansen, Ella FR Tennessee 27.5 500 Freestyle 4:34.27 6 400 Individual 4:01.61 5 200 Butterfly 1:54.28 16
Abraham, Minna SO Southern Cali 27 200 Freestyle 1:41.29 3 100 Freestyle 47.34 8
Hayes, Leah FR Virginia 26 200 Individual 1:53.84 9 400 Individual 4:01.34 4 200 Breaststroke 2:07.85 15
Gridley, Kaelyn JR Duke 26 100 Breaststroke 58.14 9 200 Breaststroke 2:05.71 2
Stadden, Isabelle Grad California 26 100 Backstroke 50.26 7 200 Backstroke 1:49.96 5
Moesch, Annaliesa FR Virginia 24 50 Freestyle 21.84 21 200 Freestyle 1:43.12 9 100 Freestyle 46.76 4
Bellard, Hannah SO Michigan 23 500 Freestyle 4:34.77 9 100 Butterfly 52.72 53 200 Butterfly 1:52.04 5
Polonsky, Lea SR California 23 200 Individual 1:53.28 7 200 Freestyle 1:42.71 8 200 Butterfly 1:55.13 25
Pelaez, Erika FR NC State 22 100 Butterfly 51.81 33 100 Backstroke 50.46 8 200 Backstroke 1:50.56 8
Dobler, Kaitlyn Grad Southern Cali 21.5 100 Breaststroke 57.41 4 200 Breaststroke 2:07.22 10
Yendell, Sophie Grad Pittsburgh 21 50 Freestyle 21.30 5 100 Butterfly 51.13 10 100 Freestyle 48.77 60
Gemmell, Erin SO Texas 20 500 Freestyle 4:38.21 23 200 Freestyle 1:42.32 6 100 Freestyle 47.38 10
Carvalho, Giulia SR Miami (FL) 19 50 Freestyle 21.69 10 100 Butterfly 50.91 7 100 Freestyle 47.78 19
Wiseman, Avery SR Alabama 19 100 Breaststroke 58.51 13 200 Breaststroke 2:06.28 4
Weber, Emma JR Virginia 18 200 Individual 1:57.41 47 100 Breaststroke 58.18 10 200 Breaststroke 2:06.97 8
Douthwright, Brooklyn SR Tennessee 18 50 Freestyle 22.43 70 200 Freestyle 1:42.62 7 100 Freestyle 47.44 11
Brousseau, Julie FR Florida 17 500 Freestyle 4:34.59 8 400 Individual 4:04.21 11 1650 Freestyle 16:00.47 19
McCulloh, Abigail SR Georgia 17 500 Freestyle 4:36.18 16 200 Freestyle 1:45.68 48 1650 Freestyle 15:45.77 3
Miller, Mackenzie JR Brigham Young 17 200 Individual 1:58.27 63 100 Breaststroke 58.60 14 200 Breaststroke 2:06.53 5
Albiero, Gabi Grad Louisville 16.5 50 Freestyle 21.71 11 100 Butterfly 51.18 11 100 Freestyle 47.46 12
Bray, Olivia Grad Texas 16 100 Butterfly 51.26 13 100 Backstroke 51.52 29 200 Butterfly 1:52.61 7
Gan, Ching SR Indiana 15 500 Freestyle 4:37.49 19 200 Freestyle 1:45.60 47 1650 Freestyle 15:46.22 4
Stotler, Sara SR Tennessee 15 200 Individual 1:54.56 13 100 Butterfly 51.50 18 200 Butterfly 1:52.66 8
Nordmann, Lillian SR Stanford 15 200 Individual 1:55.15 19 100 Butterfly 51.51 20 200 Butterfly 1:51.85 4
Hurst, Kate FR Texas 14 500 Freestyle 4:37.59 20 1650 Freestyle 15:47.93 5
Welch, Ella JR Louisville 14 50 Freestyle 22.06 42 100 Butterfly 50.74 5 100 Freestyle 48.73 57
Arens, Abigail Grad Texas 14 100 Butterfly 51.01 9 100 Breaststroke 58.49 12 200 Breaststroke 2:07.94 17
Bottazzo, Anita FR Florida 14 100 Breaststroke 57.49 5 200 Breaststroke 2:08.66 26
Enge, Piper FR Texas 14 100 Breaststroke 57.69 6 200 Breaststroke 2:07.90 16
Nikanorov, Mila FR Ohio St 13 500 Freestyle 4:37.43 18 200 Freestyle 1:46.47 51 1650 Freestyle 15:49.26 6
Flynn, Lindsay SR Michigan 13 50 Freestyle 21.83 20 100 Butterfly 53.30 60 100 Freestyle 47.30 6
Stege, Rachel SR Georgia 12.5 500 Freestyle 4:34.27 6 200 Freestyle 1:45.09 41 1650 Freestyle 16:03.73 24
Noble, Helen JR NC State 12.5 200 Individual 1:56.22 27 100 Backstroke 50.75 10 200 Backstroke 1:51.22 11
Diaconescu, Rebecca FR Michigan 12 500 Freestyle 4:35.03 10 200 Freestyle 1:44.46 30 1650 Freestyle 15:56.12 12
Geringer, Maya Grad California 12 500 Freestyle 4:39.81 40 1650 Freestyle 15:51.01 7
Vincent, Cadence SO Alabama 12 50 Freestyle 21.59 7 100 Backstroke 52.64 51 100 Freestyle 48.00 31
Weiler Sastre, Carmen JR Virginia Tech 12 50 Freestyle 22.11 48 100 Backstroke 50.82 12 200 Backstroke 1:50.68 10
Crye, Joleigh JR Cincinnati 12 100 Butterfly 52.13 43 100 Breaststroke 58.09 7
Wanezek, Margaret FR Wisconsin 11.5 200 Individual 1:56.74 39 100 Backstroke 50.96 14 200 Backstroke 1:50.62 9
Angove, Sienna FR Ohio St 11 200 Individual 1:54.81 17 400 Individual 4:03.92 8 100 Freestyle 48.19 39
Peoples, Olivia SR Florida 11 50 Freestyle 22.39 66 100 Butterfly 50.96 8 100 Breaststroke 1:00.64 46
Fangli, Henrietta SR Houston 11 100 Breaststroke 58.12 8 200 Breaststroke 2:10.74 43
Dixon, Zoe JR Florida 10 200 Individual 1:54.57 14 400 Individual 4:03.99 10 200 Backstroke 1:52.40 23
Paegle, Kristina JR Indiana 10 50 Freestyle 21.63 8 100 Freestyle 47.66 17
Larsen, Caroline FR Louisville 10 50 Freestyle 21.63 8 100 Breaststroke 59.63 41 100 Freestyle 48.21 41
Zavaros, Mabel Grad Florida 9 500 Freestyle 4:38.98 29 400 Individual 4:03.93 9 200 Backstroke 1:52.24 19
Howley, Tess SO Virginia 9 500 Freestyle 4:43.18 58 100 Backstroke 52.19 45 200 Butterfly 1:52.72 9
Sim, Letitia JR Michigan 9 200 Individual 1:54.64 15 100 Breaststroke 58.74 15 200 Breaststroke 2:07.28 12
Brown, Emily FR Tennessee 9 200 Individual 1:55.24 20 400 Individual 4:05.17 13 200 Butterfly 1:53.31 12
Lundgren, Emily JR Washington St. 9 200 Individual 1:57.81 57 100 Breaststroke 59.45 33 200 Breaststroke 2:07.08 9
RESSENCOURT, Lilou SR California 9 100 Butterfly 51.29 14 200 Butterfly 1:53.12 11
Gormsen, Cavan SO Virginia 8.5 500 Freestyle 4:35.60 15 200 Freestyle 1:44.63 36 1650 Freestyle 15:54.05 10
Coetzee, Dune SR Georgia 8 500 Freestyle 4:35.19 11 200 Freestyle 1:43.87 15 1650 Freestyle 16:02.60 23
Chase, Campbell FR Texas 7 200 Individual 1:53.89 10 400 Individual 4:06.57 17 200 Breaststroke 2:11.08 46
Kruger, Lainy SO Florida 7 200 Individual 1:54.08 11 200 Freestyle 1:43.90 16 200 Butterfly 1:55.08 23
Pelzek, Greta SR South Carolina 7 100 Butterfly 51.46 17 200 Butterfly 1:52.80 10
Kennedy, Eliot SR Minnesota 6.5 500 Freestyle 4:39.82 41 1650 Freestyle 15:54.05 10
Jones, Emily JR Alabama 6.5 50 Freestyle 22.22 56 100 Backstroke 50.75 10 200 Backstroke 1:52.25 20
Crawford, Brearna SR Indiana 6.5 100 Breaststroke 59.52 38 200 Breaststroke 2:07.22 10
Nesty, Lillian FR Texas 6 500 Freestyle 4:36.72 17 200 Freestyle 1:43.21 11 200 Backstroke 1:52.51 25
Smith, Skyler SR UNC 6 50 Freestyle 22.55 75 100 Breaststroke 58.26 11 200 Breaststroke 2:08.85 30
Rankin, Mia SR Ohio St 5 500 Freestyle 4:41.98 51 400 Individual 4:04.85 12 1650 Freestyle 16:09.55 39
Coe, Angela SO Texas 5 200 Individual 1:54.33 12 400 Individual 4:08.63 31 200 Butterfly 1:56.01 39
Marlin, Krista JR Ohio St 5 200 Individual 1:55.66 23 400 Individual 4:06.79 18 200 Backstroke 1:51.29 12
Gring, Sydney SO Pittsburgh 5 200 Individual 1:56.45 33 100 Butterfly 51.25 12 200 Butterfly 1:57.01 41
Landreneau, Marie FR Georgia 5 200 Individual 1:58.56 64 200 Freestyle 1:43.32 12 100 Freestyle 48.77 60
Parker, Maxine Grad Virginia 5 50 Freestyle 21.75 12 200 Freestyle 1:44.56 32 100 Freestyle 47.81 22
Cheatwood, Mia JR Louisville 5 100 Breaststroke 58.77 16 200 Breaststroke 2:07.74 13
Tuggle, Claire JR Southern Cali 4.5 500 Freestyle 4:35.43 12 200 Freestyle 1:45.23 45 100 Freestyle 49.10 72
Longi, Ava Grad Texas 4.5 50 Freestyle 21.90 27 100 Butterfly 52.07 42 100 Freestyle 47.46 12
Wilson, Kayla JR Stanford 4 500 Freestyle 4:38.82 27 200 Freestyle 1:43.33 13 100 Freestyle 48.74 58
Jorgenson, Genevieve JR Nebraska 4 500 Freestyle 4:39.31 34 400 Individual 4:13.78 46 1650 Freestyle 15:56.70 13
Brison, Sophie SO Tennessee 4 500 Freestyle 4:46.74 68 100 Backstroke 52.53 50 200 Backstroke 1:51.35 13
McKenna, Kacey SR Indiana 4 50 Freestyle 22.55 75 100 Backstroke 50.87 13 200 Backstroke 1:53.77 42
Sartori, Sofia JR LSU 4 100 Butterfly 51.55 22 200 Backstroke 1:54.35 47 200 Butterfly 1:54.05 13
Tierney, Hailey SO Wisconsin 3.5 50 Freestyle 21.76 13 100 Butterfly 52.49 49 100 Freestyle 48.59 53
Kendall, Brady JR Michigan 3.5 50 Freestyle 21.76 13 100 Butterfly 51.60 24 100 Freestyle 48.20 40
Fassina Romao, Leticia FR Louisville 3 500 Freestyle 4:43.10 56 1650 Freestyle 15:58.57 14
McMillan, Ashley SO Southern Cali 3 200 Individual 1:56.21 26 400 Individual 4:05.20 14 200 Breaststroke 2:10.31 41
Theall, Olivia Grad Texas A&M 3 200 Individual 1:56.70 38 100 Butterfly 51.51 20 200 Butterfly 1:54.09 14
Stepanek, Chloe Grad Texas A&M 3 50 Freestyle 22.14 52 200 Freestyle 1:43.82 14 100 Freestyle 47.98 27
Pfaff, Alison SO Duke 3 50 Freestyle 22.39 66 100 Backstroke 51.11 18 200 Backstroke 1:51.55 14
Herscu, Abigail JR California 3 100 Breaststroke 1:00.00 44 200 Breaststroke 2:07.82 14
Nel, Olivia JR NC State 2.5 50 Freestyle 21.82 19 100 Backstroke 51.90 40 100 Freestyle 47.63 14
Pattison, Greer SR UNC 2.5 50 Freestyle 22.07 43 100 Backstroke 50.96 14 100 Freestyle 48.97 70
Travis, Chase Grad NC State 2 500 Freestyle 4:39.47 38 1650 Freestyle 15:59.15 15
Sun, Eleanor SO Princeton 2 200 Individual 1:55.50 22 400 Individual 4:06.22 15 200 Butterfly 1:54.64 17
Bentz, Caroline Grad Arizona St 2 50 Freestyle 21.77 15 100 Backstroke 51.22 22 200 Backstroke 1:51.89 17
Wall, Tatum JR Duke 2 50 Freestyle 21.79 16 100 Freestyle 47.65 16
Ullmann, Julia FR Arizona St 2 50 Freestyle 22.13 50 100 Butterfly 51.40 15 100 Freestyle 48.82 64
Novelline, Carly JR Virginia 2 100 Butterfly 51.50 18 100 Backstroke 51.68 36 200 Butterfly 1:54.23 15
Choate, Catherine SO Florida 1.5 200 Individual 1:58.88 66 100 Backstroke 51.54 31 200 Backstroke 1:51.78 15
Atkinson, Emma Grad Virginia Tech 1.5 200 Freestyle 1:45.35 46 100 Backstroke 52.31 47 200 Backstroke 1:51.78 15
Mattes, Michaela SO Florida 1 500 Freestyle 4:37.95 22 400 Individual 4:08.01 27 1650 Freestyle 15:59.38 16
Thompson, Emily FR Stanford 1 200 Individual 1:55.87 24 400 Individual 4:06.28 16 200 Butterfly 1:55.52 32
Cannings, Kamryn SO Liberty 1 50 Freestyle 22.07 43 100 Butterfly 51.42 16 100 Freestyle 48.45 48
Berglund, Berit SO Texas 1 100 Backstroke 51.02 16 200 Backstroke 1:52.97 30

Gretchen Walsh is the only swimmer projected to have a perfect meet scoring 60 points by winning all three of her events, and there are no swimmers who are seeded to win two individuals and finish 2nd in one.

After that there are three women who are seeded to win one event and place 2nd in the other two. Bella Sims from Florida is seeded to win the 100 backstroke and finish 2nd in the 500 freestyle and 200 backstroke. Sims is the reigning champion in the 200 and 500 freestyle events, though she opted for the 200 back this year instead.

Advertisement

Torri Huske is looking at the same breakdown with a win in the 200 IM, and 2nd place finishes in the 100 fly and 100 free, both behind Gretchen Walsh. Huske has never won an event at the NCAA Championships, so a win in the 200 IM would be uncharted territory for her.

Finally, Alex Walsh is seeded 1st in the 100 breast, 2nd in the 200 IM, and 2nd in the 200 fly. Walsh is the NCAA record holder in the 200 fly, but she has not been that fast this season and Emma Sticklen was only one-hundredth off her time at SECs

While Gretchen Walsh is the only swimmer who is projected to win three events, she is not the only swimmer projected to win all of their events. Texas freshman Jillian Cox comes in as the top seed in the women’s 500 free and 1650 free, and these are her only two events. She did not earn a qualification in the women’s 200 freestyle, coming in tied for 40th, and elected not to swim it.

View the Full Scored Sheet Here





Source link

Advertisement

Virginia

Senate approves lawmaker pay raise as teacher pay hike stalls in Virginia budget talks

Published

on

Senate approves lawmaker pay raise as teacher pay hike stalls in Virginia budget talks


As the legislative session in Richmond comes closer to an end, lawmakers are still hard at work hammering out the budget for the year ahead. This year, the Senate has approved a pay raise for lawmakers after tabling bills that would have provided larger pay increases for teachers.

With the cost of living rising, teachers across Virginia have been watching the proposed budget closely and hoping for higher pay.

In February, a bill that would have raised teacher salaries by 4.5% each year until reaching the national average of $77,000 was tabled until next year. The decision left some educators disappointed.

“It’s definitely disappointing. We’re at a time where we are struggling to keep highly qualified staff in the buildings and in the profession, to be quite honest, because we have to compete with other industries,” Karl Loos, president of the Lynchburg Education Association, said.

Advertisement

SEE ALSO: ‘Strangest election cycle:’ Registrars prepare for referendum vote despite legal limbo

There is still a 3% increase for teachers included in the proposed Senate budget, and a 2% increase in the House of Delegates’ proposed budget. But Loos said a 3% raise only matches the rate of inflation, and will likely not be appealing enough to fill vacant positions.

“I think certainly teacher pay is a deterrent for a lot of people, especially as they see the amount of work that goes into it and the compensation for that work,” Loos said.

The Virginia Education Association also advocated for the 4.5% pay increase. Chad Stewart, the interim director of Government Relations and Research, said they believe budget uncertainty may have made lawmakers hesitant to commit to long-term increases they might not be able to sustain.

According to the State Fiscal Impact Statement, seen below, it would have required an additional $159.0 million in 2027, and increasing amounts for the next couple of years to meet the goal of reaching the national average.

Advertisement

“We’ve seen commitments going back decades from previous governors who have all stated they want to get the national teacher pay average, but no governor has ever delivered on it,” Stewart said.

Stewart said the average national pay for teachers they are hoping to meet is $77,000, and that the current average salary for teachers in the Commonwealth is around $70,000. He said ultimately it comes down to the budget, and he hopes in the following years teachers will receive that larger pay increase. Stewart said the organization hopes Gov. Spanberger will be the first to follow through on that promise.

Meanwhile, legislation that would increase pay for state lawmakers was passed in the Senate on Thursday. Republican Del. Tim Griffin of the 53rd District said he voted against the measure.

“I was outraged last week when they raised their own pay. I voted against it,” Griffin said. “When you run on affordability, I think people expected it to be more affordable for the people that live and work in Virginia, not for ourselves. It kind of defeats the purpose.”

When asked about the proposed pay increases in the House and the Senate, Campbell County Superintendent Clay Stanley said in a statement, “I am praying for 3%. Our teachers, at minimum, deserve a raise that matches the cost of living increase.”

Advertisement

ABC13 reached out to local Democratic lawmakers for comment on the teacher pay raise legislation, but did not receive a response.



Source link

Continue Reading

Virginia

Why a 6-year-old with diabetes is pushing for change in Virginia – WTOP News

Published

on

Why a 6-year-old with diabetes is pushing for change in Virginia – WTOP News


First grader Ruston Revell is pressing Virginia lawmakers to pass a bill that he argues will make schools safer for kids with diabetes.

This page contains a video which is being blocked by your ad blocker.
In order to view the video you must disable your ad blocker.

Why a 6-year-old with diabetes is pushing for change in Virginia

Speaking in front of Virginia lawmakers, 6-year-old Ruston Revell needs a wooden stool to reach the microphone for his testimony about diabetes.

Advertisement

Dressed in his blue suit and red tie, he’s there on a mission.

“Living with diabetes isn’t easy, there are lots of ups and downs — just like my blood sugar,” Ruston told legislators in the Virginia General Assembly.

The legislation that brought Ruston from Prince William County to Richmond would update an existing law to specify how Virginia schools handle accommodations for students with diabetes.

“When I’m at school, my nurse and all my teachers help me when I need it, but not all kids like me are that lucky,” Ruston told WTOP. “These bills change that, so kids with diabetes can be safer in schools.”

He’s testified before committees in both chambers as corresponding bills move through the Virginia General Assembly. HB1301 and SB122 have both earned support in their respective chamber.

Advertisement

“Although, I’m small, my voice is big and it can change the world,” Ruston said.

In his testimony, the first grader clearly explained the care he requires to manage his Type 1 diabetes during the school day.

“He just pops up on his little stool and takes control of the room,” said Kelly Revell, Ruston’s mom. “It’s usually a little quiet, and after he finishes, he gets a whole room full of applause.”

Today, Ruston enjoys playing baseball, swimming and spending time at the playground.

But things were different before his diagnosis five years ago.

Advertisement

A life-changing diagnosis at 15 months old

During the summer of 2020, Kelly said her son started showing signs of diabetes, such as extreme thirst — symptoms she recognized because her father had been diagnosed in his 20s.

“He would just lounge around the house and have no interest in playing with his sister,” Kelly said. “He stopped eating, so he was eventually airlifted to Children’s National in D.C., where he was admitted to the pediatric ICU for nearly a week.”

At just 15 months old, Ruston was diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes. Kelly said that news was life-changing.

“Now, in order to keep him alive, we have to hurt him multiple times a day, by giving him four to five shots and even a dozen finger pricks just to make sure his blood sugar is in range,” she recalled.

Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease where the body attacks cells that make insulin. A lack of insulin can lead to high blood sugar, which could cause serious health issues or be deadly.

Advertisement

“We had to wake up at 2 a.m. every night for six weeks, before we started utilizing technology, just to make sure that he was safe and healthy with his blood sugar,” Kelly said. “A lot of times, it resulted in phone calls to the hospital because he was at a dangerous level, and then we would be up for hours making sure he was back in range.”

For the Revell family, managing Ruston’s diabetes looks different nowadays.

Ruston Revell, 6, has traveled from Prince William County to Richmond to testify in favor of a bill surrounding Virginia schools and students with diabetes.
(Courtesy Kelly Revell)

Courtesy Kelly Revell

Ruston stands alongside Virginia Sen. Jeremy McPike, who sponsored the bill in the upper chamber
Ruston stands alongside Virginia Sen. Jeremy McPike, who sponsored the bill in the upper chamber.
(Courtesy Kelly Revell)

Courtesy Kelly Revell

Ruston testifying in front of Virginia lawmakers
Ruston and other advocates say the bill would make schools safer for kids with diabetes.
(Courtesy Kelly Revell)

Courtesy Kelly Revell

Ruston and his mom Kelly (middle) have joined other advocates in Richmond to press legislators to pass the bill
Ruston and his mom Kelly (middle) have joined other advocates in Richmond to press legislators to pass the bill.
(Courtesy Kelly Revell)

Courtesy Kelly Revell

Ruston poses in Richmond
The statewide regulations on diabetes care in school haven’t been updated since 1999, Kelly said.
(Courtesy Kelly Revell)

Courtesy Kelly Revell

Advertisement

How a 6-year-old handles his diabetes

Ruston knows how to prick his finger to check whether his blood sugar is in range.

“My mom and dad help me change my insulin pump every three days, and my CGM every 10 days,” Ruston said, referencing his continuous glucose monitor, known as a CGM.

“It hurts, but at least I don’t have to do shots. They’re the worst.”

Living with diabetes, Ruston needs to calculate the number of carbs he’s getting to determine his insulin dose, which is administered automatically through a pump.

“He is a pro at using a food scale,” Kelly said. “If he wants to eat anything, apple slices, we cut them up, and he puts them on the food scale and determines how many carbs are in that.”

Advertisement

Halfway through his interview with WTOP, Ruston’s phone beeped, flagging his low blood sugar and triggering a quick juice-box break.

That’s the kind of intervention he could require at school.

“When I’m low, Nurse Barnes tells Ms. Grant for me to have a juice box or gummies,” Ruston said, describing a snack to correct his blood sugar.

At his current school, Kelly said Ruston has had all his medical accommodations met since his first day of kindergarten.

“He gets so many hugs. Everyone knows him. He walks into the front office every day to visit the clinic, and they just they really take care of him,” she said.

Advertisement

Things were more complicated before Ruston began kindergarten. Kelly said the family was initially told that the accommodations requested by his doctor would not be allowed.

“What was most difficult at the time was the thought that a kindergartener would be responsible for alerting adults if his phone signaled a low or high blood sugar, rather than having trained staff receive those alerts directly through available technology,” she told WTOP.

The situation was resolved, but it drew Kelly’s attention toward legal protections for kids with diabetes.

What Kelly and Ruston are asking Virginia lawmakers to do

ruston stands at podium talking
Ruston told lawmakers about his experience managing diabetes during the school day. (Courtesy Kelly Revell)

For the past several years, Kelly has been involved with an advocacy group, FOLLOWT1Ds, which argues that unclear or inconsistent school policies can create stress for families and put kids in danger.

“Prince William County has updated their diabetes policies recently, so more students with diabetes across our county are better protected,” Kelly said. “But that’s not happening everywhere in Virginia.”

The bills moving through the Virginia legislature would require school systems to create a divisionwide plan for supporting students with diabetes.

Advertisement

That would include making sure school staff are trained to follow through with a child’s medical orders.

“You really have to put in all of your trust in your school,” Kelly said. “This is a life-threatening disease, and if they forget to give him a juice box when he’s low, that can result in him going to the hospital, or it could be fatal.”

The legislation would also require schools have procedures for administering insulin and glucagon.

Families who have students with diabetes would send schools medical orders from their doctors that outline the child’s needs.

“A lot of times, the schools will either deny or modify these accommodations, even though they’re medically necessary,” Kelly said.

Advertisement

The statewide regulations haven’t been updated since 1999, Kelly said.

“While we’ve had all of these technology advances, like the insulin pump and the CGM, Virginia still hasn’t advanced their laws to align with standard methods of care that we’re using today,” Kelly said.

Ruston doesn’t receive insulin shots anymore. But Virginia law is behind on that front, according to Kelly and other advocates.

“Right now, the policy in Virginia, if his pump were to fall off while at school, they would, instead of reinsert the pump, they would give him a shot,” Kelly said.

In that scenario, Kelly said the school employee would have to calculate how much insulin to dose.

Advertisement

“I wouldn’t even know what to dose him, because with the pump, it’s automated nowadays,” she said. “It would require an immediate call to his doctor for guidance.”

She worries that it could lead to a miscalculation and health complications.

Kelly said the lack of consistency can impact older students, too. She said some high schoolers have gotten in trouble for having their cellphones at schools that ban the devices.

But those phones let students monitor their blood sugar, communicate medical treatments and administer insulin.

It’s the second year in a row that advocates like Kelly have asked legislators in Richmond to approve revisions to state law.

Advertisement

This time, Ruston is joining the push for change by sharing his story with lawmakers.

“I want to make sure other kids in different schools can have more help with diabetes,” Ruston told WTOP.

Anyone interested in following the legislation or submitting a comment to lawmakers can find more information on FOLLOW T1Ds’ website.

Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

© 2026 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Virginia

Del. Dan Helmer on Virginia redistricting and congressional run

Published

on

Del. Dan Helmer on Virginia redistricting and congressional run


Virginia Delegate Dan Helmer led fellow Democrats to major gains in November’s election. Now he’s turning his attention to the redistricting of the Commonwealth, and a run in the newly proposed 7th district. He joins Sydney Persing on The Final 5 to discuss. 



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending