Connect with us

Virginia

Man booked in Virginia City shooting, allegedly fires six shots at family members in vehicle – Carson Now

Published

on

Man booked in Virginia City shooting, allegedly fires six shots at family members in vehicle – Carson Now


On Saturday, June 28, 2025 at 3:46 p.m., Storey County Sheriff’s Office deputies were dispatched to a report of shots fired located near the intersection of B Street and Union Street in Virginia City, Nev.

Deputies were on scene within a minute. Several witnesses told them that the alleged shooter was now on Union Street. Deputies immediately located the suspect and advised they had taken him into custody at 3:49 p.m. The suspect was identified as Steven Bowron, 63, of Reno.

Upon investigation and interviews with multiple witnesses, it was determined Bowron was intoxicated and had gotten into an argument with two family members regarding his vehicle keys being taken from him.

As family members left the scene in their vehicle, Bowron used a firearm to fire approximately six times at the vehicle. Bowron then proceeded east bound on Union Street, on foot, where he discarded the firearm in a parking lot shortly before being detained by deputies.

Advertisement

Deputies located the firearm and canvassed the area for evidence. Six shell casings were located in the area were Bowron was said have shot from.

The two victims in the vehicle were evaluated and found to be uninjured in the incident. The victims vehicle was observed to have bullet holes extending from the driver’s side door to the rear of the driver’s side.

Bowron was placed under arrest and transported to the Storey County Detention Facility, where he was booked on the following charges, with a total bail of $175,140:

NRS 200.010 Attempted murder with use of a deadly weapon (two counts)

NRS199.220 Destroy or conceal evidence

Advertisement

NRS 202.257 Possess firearm while under influence of alcohol

NRS 202.280.1 Discharge firearm in or upon public thoroughfare or in place of public resort

NRS 202.595.1 Disregard for safety of person or property

NRS 202.285.1b Discharge firearm at or into a vehicle



Source link

Virginia

Virginia’s gambling expansion must be matched by recovery support

Published

on

Virginia’s gambling expansion must be matched by recovery support


When I was a kid, some of my happiest memories involved gambling. My grandfather would babysit me while my parents worked. We’d pull our chairs up to an old World War II trunk to use as a table where we’d play Crazy Eights, poker or dominoes for pennies. Those moments meant everything to me. They […]



Source link

Continue Reading

Virginia

Virginia State Police investigates fatal crash on Bayside Road in Northampton County

Published

on

Virginia State Police investigates fatal crash on Bayside Road in Northampton County


NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, Va. (WAVY) — Virginia State Police is investigating a fatal crash that happened on Bayside Road in Northampton County Saturday morning.

On March 28 at around 10:52 a.m., a 2016 Nissan Quest was traveling southbound on Bayside Road when it crossed the centerline, ran off of the road’s left side, and hit a ditch and a tree.

The car’s driver, Exmore resident Waylon M. Turner, 42, was seriously injured due to the crash. He succumbed to his injuries after being transported to a local hospital. He wore a seatbelt at the time of the crash.

The crash is now under investigation.

Advertisement

Continue to check WAVY.com for updates.



Source link

Continue Reading

Virginia

Goochland residents sue county over Technology Overlay District approval

Published

on

Goochland residents sue county over Technology Overlay District approval


GOOCHLAND COUNTY, Va. (WRIC) — Four Goochland residents are taking the county’s board of supervisors and planning commission to court, alleging officials failed to lawfully and clearly explain their approved Technology Overlay District (TOD).

In November, the board adjusted zoning rules and approved the TOD and a Technology Zone (TZ) to incentivize data centers and high-tech businesses to be in eastern Goochland.

That approval came after months of community meetings and public comment periods where neighbors shared concerns about the environmental impacts, noise emissions and the county’s rural character.

Plaintiff Cynthia Haas and informal legal advisor John Gessner both live near, but outside, the zone and believe their concerns could lead to unknown impacts of data center development and operations.

Advertisement

“Water, power: nobody knows. It borders on reckless to approve these — or make it easier for them to be built — without knowing exactly what the impacts are,” said Gessner, who also built a career as a zoning lawyer.

“[Data center development] is coming one way or the other,” Haas said. “You’re throwing all this stuff into the TOD without considering the consequences.”

After public hearings, the county made some changes to the project, such as increasing buffers around homes and reforming noise limits.

“It is true there were all sorts of public meetings, but there was never an opportunity to find out really what they were thinking and the reasoning for it,” Gessner said.

The lawsuit claimed Goochland did not properly advertise the project, violated zoning regulations and made last-minute changes to the district without hearing from residents.

Advertisement

Around 300 people have donated to support Haas’s and the plaintiff’s filing, in hopes of reversing the TOD.

A Goochland County spokesperson says its leadership stands by its approval process. In February, its board of supervisors approved a $250,000 fund for the county’s defense. If the county’s defense is less than $250,000, the spokesperson said the additional funds will be returned to the county’s unassigned general fund.

Another $100,000 is being used for the county’s defense, part of a public officials’ liability policy through the Virginia Association of Counties Self-Insurance Risk Pool.

County administration told 8News last year that revenues from businesses in the district would help lower residents’ taxes and help pay for a water and sewer service debt.

The county spokesperson said in part, “Adoption of the TOD and TZ establishes standards and expectations. It does not approve any specific project. Any proposed technology development must still comply with all applicable requirements…”

Advertisement

“We’re going to continue to fight this. We’re not going to let a group of men pass illegal legislation and get away with it,” Haas said. “That’s not the way this is going to working in Goochland anymore.”

A hearing is set for Tuesday, May 26, in the Goochland Circuit Court, where the court will decide which of the 8,500 documents filed will be submitted for the record.

Goochland has asked the court to throw the suit out, but a hearing for that has not been scheduled.

Learn more about the TOD and Goochland County’s full statement on the pending litigation here.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending