The Virginia Cavaliers earned a 79-70 win over the No. 20 Louisville Cardinals on Tuesday night, claiming their first ranked-win of the Ryan Odom era in emphatic fashion against a tough ACC opponent on the road.
Virginia
Five takeaways from Virginia basketball’s 79-70 win vs. No. 20 Louisville
Virginia went on a 14-0 run to start the game, but Louisville responded with an 8-0 run to shrink the deficit. Although Louisville never managed to take the lead, some hot stretches frazzled Virginia, resulting in scrambled defense and a rushed offense for the back end of the first half.
While Virginia’s second half was cleaner, both teams struggled with foul trouble, with Virginia tallying 22 fouls to Louisville’s 21. The whistles were consistent on either end of the court – but frustrating and stunted momentum.
Familiar face Isaac McKneely had his best game in a Louisville uniform to date, leading the Cardinals in scoring with 23 points. His five made threes were all too familiar for Wahoo fans.
While Virginia showcased some strong stretches, there’s a lot to learn from the ranked, ACC matchup. Here are our five takeaways for the win over Louisville.
Malik Thomas steps up while Thijs De Ridder goes quiet
The graduate student guard had a statement game, leading the team in scoring with 19 points and hitting 6-of-8 from beyond the arc. He tallied five rebounds and three assists, but paid for it in four turnovers in his 25 minutes of play.
It’s a welcome sign for Thomas, who is rounding into shooting form after starting the season below his career average (37.4%). After going 0-for-5 from deep against Stanford on Saturday, he was in takeover mode against the Cardinals.
Thijs De Ridder coughed the ball up five times. But, unlike Thomas, didn’t make up for it, offensively. He contributed a quiet nine points, shooting 0-for-3 from the arc while picking up eight rebounds. The team’s leading scorer displayed some clean post defense early on, but was slow on the help as the game progressed.
Even in imperfect games, Virginia’s talent carries them through
The team’s talent is remarkable. For starters, Virginia has nearly a full roster of three-point shooters. Even against Louisville when shooters like De Ridder goes 0-for-3, Chance Mallory finishes 0-for-4, and Tillis shoots 0-for-1, the team still hit 41% from behind the arc – led by Thomas’s statement 6-for-8.
To have enough depth to make up for three dry shooters is an X-factor Virginia isn’t used to having.
Not to mention the team’s 79% success from the line (23-for-29) compared to Louisville’s 67% (12-for-18). With consistent (and some questionable) whistles, the team’s foul shooting was reliable and, in many games that end foul-for-foul, will prove decisive if they continue to improve at the charity stripe.
Whether it’s three-point shooting or the shot-blockers in the post, the team is fueled by talent – so much so that even technically imperfect games against Louisville stand out on the stat sheet and end with a clear victory. The challenge for the ‘Hoos isn’t whether they have championship talent, but whether they can consistently – and cleanly – execute come March. UVA just beat a respected, ranked conference team. But what matters more is if Virginia can still learn from and improve after victory, since the lessons tend to be more obvious in defeat.
The Wahoo defense lacked some fundamentals
While Johann Grunloh and De Ridder started the game with strong defense, guarding the rim with minimal fouls and textbook big-man play. But, defense got sloppy, with guards trailing on the drive and lacking solid help defense – allowing too many buckets from the paint.
In a statistical sense, the ‘Hoos look strong – especially when considering nine blocks and 30 defensive rebounds. In a more technical sense, Virginia lacked some defensive fundamentals. While they tightened it up in the second half, most of the players struggled with on-ball defense, with guys like Dallin Hall and Sam Lewis repeatedly failing to stay in front of their man and guarding along the hip. Plus, the help defense was slow–with Louisville succeeding on uncontested or poorly contested drives to the basket. In the end, Virginia gave up 26 points in the paint, compared to Louisville giving up only 12.
While a number of players were getting beaten off the dribble, Jacari White showcased impressive footwork and made a noticeable difference on the floor. His contributions go beyond the stat sheet and are in the sound defensive play that often isn’t talked about.
Virginia’s rushed offense counted on the three – maybe too much
There’s no argument that Virginia is now a three-point threat. They make a lot of them. The team shot 41% from beyond the arc – an encouraging team statistic. The bigs started the game with a couple of statement threes. But once the lead crept in during the first half, the team rushed their offense, forcing the fast break or taking the first shot – not the best one.
While it worked out in the end, Virginia does better when they set up their offense. In fact, for much of this season, they’ve displayed some beautiful, textbook ball movement that sets them up for the perimeter shot or the dump down low. After Louisville started to close on their deficit in the first half, Virginia took too many fast breaks and early-shot-clock threes. While they made enough, with their talent, they could have secured a run-away game. Their rushed offense led to 13 team turnovers for Virginia—which Louisville converted into 19 points.
Against Louisville, Virginia showed that their offense can get frazzled. And when it does, they put a lot of trust in the three. On Tuesday, guys like Thomas made it count. But, the shots won’t always fall.
Virginia has a deep bench–and Odom is using it well
Consistent substitutions are becoming a part of head coach Ryan Odom’s philosophy. As we’ve seen all season, ten players hit the court for double digit minutes against Louisville – which compares starkly to Bennett-area basketball that relied on the first six or seven players.
Virginia’s roster has depth, and he’s regularly subbing in players – sometimes two or three at a time. And, it’s a strategic move. First, the opponent doesn’t get the chance to base their defensive game plan around a single star player. Instead, opponents like Louisville are forced to defend the entire roster, keeping them on their toes.
Plus, it keeps Virginia’s players fresh and allows for correction on the court, instead of expecting guys to play through whatever funk they may fall in.
In the long term, it may even be a retention strategy. If players feel like they’re getting a fair slice of the game–and contributing to it–they may feel more allegiance to the program or see more room for opportunity for their own development.
Regardless, it contributes to a team mentality. With a stacked roster, it likely fuels some unselfish basketball.
Virginia
Senate approves lawmaker pay raise as teacher pay hike stalls in Virginia budget talks
RICHMOND, Va. (WSET) — As the legislative session in Richmond comes closer to an end, lawmakers are still hard at work hammering out the budget for the year ahead. This year, the Senate has approved a pay raise for lawmakers after tabling bills that would have provided larger pay increases for teachers.
With the cost of living rising, teachers across Virginia have been watching the proposed budget closely and hoping for higher pay.
In February, a bill that would have raised teacher salaries by 4.5% each year until reaching the national average of $77,000 was tabled until next year. The decision left some educators disappointed.
“It’s definitely disappointing. We’re at a time where we are struggling to keep highly qualified staff in the buildings and in the profession, to be quite honest, because we have to compete with other industries,” Karl Loos, president of the Lynchburg Education Association, said.
SEE ALSO: ‘Strangest election cycle:’ Registrars prepare for referendum vote despite legal limbo
There is still a 3% increase for teachers included in the proposed Senate budget, and a 2% increase in the House of Delegates’ proposed budget. But Loos said a 3% raise only matches the rate of inflation, and will likely not be appealing enough to fill vacant positions.
“I think certainly teacher pay is a deterrent for a lot of people, especially as they see the amount of work that goes into it and the compensation for that work,” Loos said.
The Virginia Education Association also advocated for the 4.5% pay increase. Chad Stewart, the interim director of Government Relations and Research, said they believe budget uncertainty may have made lawmakers hesitant to commit to long-term increases they might not be able to sustain.
According to the State Fiscal Impact Statement, seen below, it would have required an additional $159.0 million in 2027, and increasing amounts for the next couple of years to meet the goal of reaching the national average.
“We’ve seen commitments going back decades from previous governors who have all stated they want to get the national teacher pay average, but no governor has ever delivered on it,” Stewart said.
Stewart said the average national pay for teachers they are hoping to meet is $77,000, and that the current average salary for teachers in the Commonwealth is around $70,000. He said ultimately it comes down to the budget, and he hopes in the following years teachers will receive that larger pay increase. Stewart said the organization hopes Gov. Spanberger will be the first to follow through on that promise.
Meanwhile, legislation that would increase pay for state lawmakers was passed in the Senate on Thursday. Republican Del. Tim Griffin of the 53rd District said he voted against the measure.
“I was outraged last week when they raised their own pay. I voted against it,” Griffin said. “When you run on affordability, I think people expected it to be more affordable for the people that live and work in Virginia, not for ourselves. It kind of defeats the purpose.”
When asked about the proposed pay increases in the House and the Senate, Campbell County Superintendent Clay Stanley said in a statement, “I am praying for 3%. Our teachers, at minimum, deserve a raise that matches the cost of living increase.”
ABC13 reached out to local Democratic lawmakers for comment on the teacher pay raise legislation, but did not receive a response.
Virginia
Why a 6-year-old with diabetes is pushing for change in Virginia – WTOP News
First grader Ruston Revell is pressing Virginia lawmakers to pass a bill that he argues will make schools safer for kids with diabetes.
This page contains a video which is being blocked by your ad blocker.
In order to view the video you must disable your ad blocker.
Why a 6-year-old with diabetes is pushing for change in Virginia
Speaking in front of Virginia lawmakers, 6-year-old Ruston Revell needs a wooden stool to reach the microphone for his testimony about diabetes.
Dressed in his blue suit and red tie, he’s there on a mission.
“Living with diabetes isn’t easy, there are lots of ups and downs — just like my blood sugar,” Ruston told legislators in the Virginia General Assembly.
The legislation that brought Ruston from Prince William County to Richmond would update an existing law to specify how Virginia schools handle accommodations for students with diabetes.
“When I’m at school, my nurse and all my teachers help me when I need it, but not all kids like me are that lucky,” Ruston told WTOP. “These bills change that, so kids with diabetes can be safer in schools.”
He’s testified before committees in both chambers as corresponding bills move through the Virginia General Assembly. HB1301 and SB122 have both earned support in their respective chamber.
“Although, I’m small, my voice is big and it can change the world,” Ruston said.
In his testimony, the first grader clearly explained the care he requires to manage his Type 1 diabetes during the school day.
“He just pops up on his little stool and takes control of the room,” said Kelly Revell, Ruston’s mom. “It’s usually a little quiet, and after he finishes, he gets a whole room full of applause.”
Today, Ruston enjoys playing baseball, swimming and spending time at the playground.
But things were different before his diagnosis five years ago.
A life-changing diagnosis at 15 months old
During the summer of 2020, Kelly said her son started showing signs of diabetes, such as extreme thirst — symptoms she recognized because her father had been diagnosed in his 20s.
“He would just lounge around the house and have no interest in playing with his sister,” Kelly said. “He stopped eating, so he was eventually airlifted to Children’s National in D.C., where he was admitted to the pediatric ICU for nearly a week.”
At just 15 months old, Ruston was diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes. Kelly said that news was life-changing.
“Now, in order to keep him alive, we have to hurt him multiple times a day, by giving him four to five shots and even a dozen finger pricks just to make sure his blood sugar is in range,” she recalled.
Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease where the body attacks cells that make insulin. A lack of insulin can lead to high blood sugar, which could cause serious health issues or be deadly.
“We had to wake up at 2 a.m. every night for six weeks, before we started utilizing technology, just to make sure that he was safe and healthy with his blood sugar,” Kelly said. “A lot of times, it resulted in phone calls to the hospital because he was at a dangerous level, and then we would be up for hours making sure he was back in range.”
For the Revell family, managing Ruston’s diabetes looks different nowadays.
(Courtesy Kelly Revell)
Courtesy Kelly Revell
(Courtesy Kelly Revell)
Courtesy Kelly Revell
(Courtesy Kelly Revell)
Courtesy Kelly Revell
(Courtesy Kelly Revell)
Courtesy Kelly Revell
(Courtesy Kelly Revell)
Courtesy Kelly Revell
How a 6-year-old handles his diabetes
Ruston knows how to prick his finger to check whether his blood sugar is in range.
“My mom and dad help me change my insulin pump every three days, and my CGM every 10 days,” Ruston said, referencing his continuous glucose monitor, known as a CGM.
“It hurts, but at least I don’t have to do shots. They’re the worst.”
Living with diabetes, Ruston needs to calculate the number of carbs he’s getting to determine his insulin dose, which is administered automatically through a pump.
“He is a pro at using a food scale,” Kelly said. “If he wants to eat anything, apple slices, we cut them up, and he puts them on the food scale and determines how many carbs are in that.”
Halfway through his interview with WTOP, Ruston’s phone beeped, flagging his low blood sugar and triggering a quick juice-box break.
That’s the kind of intervention he could require at school.
“When I’m low, Nurse Barnes tells Ms. Grant for me to have a juice box or gummies,” Ruston said, describing a snack to correct his blood sugar.
At his current school, Kelly said Ruston has had all his medical accommodations met since his first day of kindergarten.
“He gets so many hugs. Everyone knows him. He walks into the front office every day to visit the clinic, and they just they really take care of him,” she said.
Things were more complicated before Ruston began kindergarten. Kelly said the family was initially told that the accommodations requested by his doctor would not be allowed.
“What was most difficult at the time was the thought that a kindergartener would be responsible for alerting adults if his phone signaled a low or high blood sugar, rather than having trained staff receive those alerts directly through available technology,” she told WTOP.
The situation was resolved, but it drew Kelly’s attention toward legal protections for kids with diabetes.
What Kelly and Ruston are asking Virginia lawmakers to do
For the past several years, Kelly has been involved with an advocacy group, FOLLOWT1Ds, which argues that unclear or inconsistent school policies can create stress for families and put kids in danger.
“Prince William County has updated their diabetes policies recently, so more students with diabetes across our county are better protected,” Kelly said. “But that’s not happening everywhere in Virginia.”
The bills moving through the Virginia legislature would require school systems to create a divisionwide plan for supporting students with diabetes.
That would include making sure school staff are trained to follow through with a child’s medical orders.
“You really have to put in all of your trust in your school,” Kelly said. “This is a life-threatening disease, and if they forget to give him a juice box when he’s low, that can result in him going to the hospital, or it could be fatal.”
The legislation would also require schools have procedures for administering insulin and glucagon.
Families who have students with diabetes would send schools medical orders from their doctors that outline the child’s needs.
“A lot of times, the schools will either deny or modify these accommodations, even though they’re medically necessary,” Kelly said.
The statewide regulations haven’t been updated since 1999, Kelly said.
“While we’ve had all of these technology advances, like the insulin pump and the CGM, Virginia still hasn’t advanced their laws to align with standard methods of care that we’re using today,” Kelly said.
Ruston doesn’t receive insulin shots anymore. But Virginia law is behind on that front, according to Kelly and other advocates.
“Right now, the policy in Virginia, if his pump were to fall off while at school, they would, instead of reinsert the pump, they would give him a shot,” Kelly said.
In that scenario, Kelly said the school employee would have to calculate how much insulin to dose.
“I wouldn’t even know what to dose him, because with the pump, it’s automated nowadays,” she said. “It would require an immediate call to his doctor for guidance.”
She worries that it could lead to a miscalculation and health complications.
Kelly said the lack of consistency can impact older students, too. She said some high schoolers have gotten in trouble for having their cellphones at schools that ban the devices.
But those phones let students monitor their blood sugar, communicate medical treatments and administer insulin.
It’s the second year in a row that advocates like Kelly have asked legislators in Richmond to approve revisions to state law.
This time, Ruston is joining the push for change by sharing his story with lawmakers.
“I want to make sure other kids in different schools can have more help with diabetes,” Ruston told WTOP.
Anyone interested in following the legislation or submitting a comment to lawmakers can find more information on FOLLOW T1Ds’ website.
Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.
© 2026 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.
Virginia
Del. Dan Helmer on Virginia redistricting and congressional run
Virginia Delegate Dan Helmer led fellow Democrats to major gains in November’s election. Now he’s turning his attention to the redistricting of the Commonwealth, and a run in the newly proposed 7th district. He joins Sydney Persing on The Final 5 to discuss.
-
World6 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts7 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Denver, CO7 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Louisiana1 week agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Oregon5 days ago2026 OSAA Oregon Wrestling State Championship Results And Brackets – FloWrestling
-
Florida3 days agoFlorida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
-
Maryland3 days agoAM showers Sunday in Maryland
-
Culture1 week agoTry This Quiz on Thrilling Books That Became Popular Movies