Texas
Texas Tech football GM James Blanchard staying with Red Raiders after Notre Dame pursuit
Texas Tech general manager James Blanchard has turned down an offer to assume the same role at Notre Dame and will remain with the Red Raiders, the school announced on Friday.
Blanchard, whom Notre Dame heavily pursued in the last week to fill the void left by Chad Bowden, received a three-year contract to stay in Lubbock through the 2027 season with a total value of $1.575 million over the three years, according to a school source, to keep him among the highest-paid front office staffers in the country.
“The success of our personnel department led by James Blanchard has obviously been noticed nationally with the significant interest he continues to generate annually,” Texas Tech coach Joey McGuire said in a statement. “We’re excited James and his family have chosen to remain Red Raiders and continue the work we started not long ago in building a consistent program that can compete for Big 12 titles. We’re much closer today than when we first arrived, and I look forward to continuing to work with James on further building out this roster.”
Notre Dame hosted Blanchard for a visit over the weekend and received a lucrative offer from the Fighting Irish. Blanchard is considered one of the top GMs in the sport and has a level of autonomy and authority over Texas Tech’s recruiting operation that most Power 4 GMs don’t.
Blanchard was McGuire’s first hire when he became Tech’s head coach in November 2021. The two worked together at Baylor, where Blanchard was hired by Matt Rhule in 2019. He spent two seasons at Baylor and had a one-year stint with the Carolina Panthers sandwiched in between.
Texas Tech signed back-to-back top-30 recruiting classes in Blanchard’s first two years with the program, only the second time the Red Raiders have achieved that in the modern recruiting era. This winter, Texas Tech heavily attacked the transfer portal, signing the No. 3 transfer class in the country according to 247Sports.
Before this season, Blanchard signed a two-year contract that would pay him $400,000 annually, which was one of the top GM salaries in the sport. Alabama awarded its GM, Courtney Morgan, a three-year deal in August with an $825,000 annual salary, resetting the market for the position. Bowden is believed to have received an even more lucrative deal than Morgan’s to join USC.
Why Blanchard was an attractive GM candidate
It’s easy to look at Texas Tech’s 23-16 record over the last three years and be underwhelmed, but it’s worth noting that that’s the best three-year stretch the Red Raiders have enjoyed since the Mike Leach era. This is a program that was spinning its wheels for the better part of a decade prior to McGuire’s arrival.
When McGuire took over, he entrusted the personnel operation to Blanchard to run how he saw fit. Blanchard bet big on athleticism, offering recruits with elite track times or other distinguishing athletic traits, even if a prospect’s high school film didn’t pop. The goal, as Blanchard has often put it, was to build “the most athletic team in the country.”
Tech was at or near the top of the Big 12 recruiting rankings in the 2023 and ’24 classes, and this year the Red Raiders shifted their attention to the portal, going all-in in hopes of winning a Big 12 title in 2025.
Blanchard, in tandem with the Matador Club — the Red Raiders’ name, image and likeness collective — led an effort to construct one of the top portal classes in the country. They largely succeeded, beating out SEC and Big Ten schools for some coveted recruits thanks to an organized, targeted effort and a lot of cash. Texas Tech turned heads in college football personnel circles for what it was able to accomplish in December.
“James is one of the smartest guys I know and an incredible talent evaluator,” Cody Campbell, co-founder of the Matador Club and a former Texas Tech offensive lineman, said earlier this winter.
Final say on scholarship offers usually falls to the head coach in college football, and though McGuire also has that power, he gave Blanchard the freedom to offer recruits without prior approval because of their mutual trust. That level of autonomy is unique in the sport.
Where does this leave Notre Dame?
There’s no getting around that failing to pry a staffer away from Texas Tech is a difficult look for Notre Dame less than a month after the Irish played for a national championship.
Head coach Marcus Freeman wanted to push his personnel department forward after Chad Bowden’s departure for USC, needing to rethink back-of-the-house operations in the eras of NIL and the transfer portal. Blanchard checked many of those boxes, although his expertise was in scouting at the high school and transfer portal realms more than managing NIL and roster limits. Because that role is new for virtually every college program, where and how Notre Dame is a process that lacks a best-process practices.
Notre Dame doesn’t need to make a splashy hire, though Bowden and Blanchard seemed to have high profiles in the recruiting and personnel worlds. But some understanding of how Notre Dame and the new era of college football works should be mandatory.
Once candidate might be Cincinnati general manager Zach Grant, a 2016 Notre Dame graduate who spent one season as the director of player personnel at Ohio State under general manager Mark Pantoni, generally considering one of the gold standards in personnel management in the sport.
GO DEEPER
Inside the rise of the college football GM
(Photo: Annie Rice / Avalanche-Journal / USA Today Network)
Texas
Texas Rangers Announce 2027 Regular Season Schedule
hosting the Athletics in the club’s home opener on Thursday, April 1. The complete 2027 schedule was announced today
by Major League Baseball.
The Rangers’ season opener on March 25
Texas
NTSB Confirms Texas Tesla Had 100% Floored Accelerator Pedal During Fatal Crash
In an incident that was horrific beyond words, late last month, a stunned family watched in horror as a car plowed into the Katy, Texas home of a 76-year-old mother and grandmother, killing her. The driver has been charged with manslaughter.
In the aftermath of the crash, it emerged that the car in question was a Tesla, and that the driver was making use of full self-driving mode (FSD) around the time the crash occurred. The victim’s family has named Tesla and the driver as defendants in a lawsuit. But per Electrek, Tesla was able to view crash data very quickly after the incident, and the head of AI at the company, Ashok Elluswamy, said the driver “manually overrode self-driving by pressing the accelerator all the way to 100% of the accel pedal in this residential area.”
In the days after the crash, Tesla fans took issue with coverage that characterized the car as in FSD when the crash occurred. CEO Elon Musk seemed to agree, replying to a post, “Yes, this makes no sense. FSD drives slowly through neighborhood streets and this was a high speed crash!”
But Musk seems to be assuming bad faith, as if coverage implied FSD had suddenly shifted into, perhaps, some kind of previously unannounced homicidal maniac mode and attacked a house. If anyone was saying this is what happened, they should apologize. It’s clearly not what happened.
And on Wednesday, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) largely confirmed Tesla’s version of events. Their report reads, in part:
“Electronic data recovered from the vehicle indicated that before the crash, the driver manually overrode FSD (Supervised) by pressing the accelerator pedal to 100%, and the vehicle’s speed was greater than 70 mph when the crash occurred.”
But cooler heads had noted weeks earlier that, like with good old fashioned cruise control, accelerating doesn’t boot you from FSD. The car takes the input, and stays in FSD. The question isn’t one of mechanics and technology, but one of philosophy: if FSD is meant to be “driving” when someone jams on the accelerator in a residential area, FSD may not be the “driver” in one important sense, but the car was still in FSD mode.
Because as much as Tesla would probably like FSD to be a total non-factor in the incident, that may not be the case either.
ABC News noted that, according to court documents, the driver claimed he “passed out” with the car in FSD on the highway, and that’s the last thing he remembers before the crash. He says he wasn’t sick, and medical records show no seizures, cardiac episodes, drugs, or alcohol.
A local Fox affiliate says records show the car was making deliveries for DoorDash while in FSD in the “hours and minutes leading up to the crash.” While in a neighborhood, it apparently signaled it was going to turn left onto one street, but instead the pedal went to the metal. This took the Tesla onto the victim’s cul-de-sac instead, and put it on its fateful collision course with her house.
To make matters weirder, other court records now show, per Electrek, that the driver had Googled the terms, “Tesla fsd not aggressive enough 2026,” “FSD is not aggressive enough for city driving,” and “Tesla fsd too timid.” That’s the kind of thing you Google when you’re looking for a Reddit post from someone sharing your consumer gripe.
In any case, the odds aren’t good that the driver wanted this to happen, nor that Tesla programmed its cars with evil intent. But FSD was being used around the time of this unusual fatal incident, and the public deserves to know more. Fortunately, a lot more will come out as the lawsuit progresses.
Texas
Texas AG secures 23andMe bankruptcy settlement after 2023 data breach
AUSTIN – Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said Wednesday he has secured a settlement of bankruptcy claims against genetic testing company 23andMe stemming from a 2023 data breach that exposed personal information, including some genetic ancestry data, of 6.9 million customers worldwide.
Paxton’s office said the settlement includes $150 million for a multistate coalition of 42 states. But because of limited funds in 23andMe’s bankruptcy estate and competing claims, the states’ recovery will be $18 million paid immediately, with Texas receiving $1,266,860.
23andMe disclosed in October 2023 that attackers had accessed accounts affecting 6.9 million consumers. Some of the information was later posted for sale on the dark web, according to Paxton’s office, which said the company learned of the breach months after the data became publicly available. The office said 23andMe initially denied a breach and later blamed consumers’ account settings and password practices.
Paxton joined a multistate investigation that concluded 23andMe used unreasonable security practices and failed to implement adequate safeguards against hacking, the office said.
23andMe filed for bankruptcy protection in March 2025. Paxton’s office said the settlement incorporates privacy and cybersecurity requirements, including enhanced security standards, comprehensive risk assessments and creation of an independent advisory board, along with enforcement of state privacy laws and continued consumer data deletion rights.
“Companies that collect and profit from Texans’ most personal information have a legal duty to protect it,” Paxton said in a statement.
The company also agreed to a $46.75 million class-action settlement in the bankruptcy case for affected U.S. consumers who submitted claims by Feb. 17, 2026, Paxton’s office said.
Copyright 2026 by KPRC Click2Houston – All rights reserved.
-
Iowa2 minutes agoJaylen Raynor Wisely Predicted To Be Starting Quarterback for Iowa State Football
-
Kansas8 minutes ago
Chiefs Name Burns & McDonnell as Owner’s Representative for New Practice Facility and Headquarters in Olathe
-
Kentucky14 minutes agoSaturated soil raises flooding risk across Kentucky after recent heavy rain
-
Louisiana20 minutes ago
Why Louisiana is one of the most mosquito infested states in the US
-
Maine26 minutes agoWife of Colombian father killed by ICE in Maine says they had planned to grow old together
-
Maryland32 minutes agoWashington Nationals 1st-round pick from Potomac Md. signs contract – WTOP News
-
Michigan38 minutes agoMichigan AG Dana Nessel visits Kalamazoo to address rising energy prices
-
Massachusetts44 minutes agoSpringfield attorney named to 2026 Massachusetts Super Lawyers list