Texas
Bill that would save THC retailers from total ban advances in Texas House panel
AUSTIN _ Legislation that could save the state’s consumable hemp market from a total ban – while reducing it to edibles and non-synthetic, smokable low-dose flower buds, grown only in Texas – passed unanimously in a Texas House committee late Wednesday.
Counties could opt out and elect to go entirely “dry” with no hemp sales at all through elections similar to those allowed for alcohol sales, and the entire hemp program would be moved from state health officials’ purview and under the direction of the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission.
Even with local option, however, the plan is in direct opposition to demands by Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and a vast majority of the Texas Senate that the state enact a total ban on gummies, vapes, drinks and other retail products made with hemp-derived synthetic tetrahydrocannabinol — or THC, the psychoactive ingredient in marijuana.
The products have proliferated through more than 8,500 license holders throughout the state since they became legal through a loophole in a 2019 farm bill.
But while Patrick visits smoke shops hoping to find underage customers and vowing to accept nothing less than Senate Bill 3’s ban on the retail consumable hemp market in its original form, the bipartisan House State Affairs Committee didn’t hesitate to rewrite the legislation before sending it to the House floor on a 15-0 vote.
The new legislation, sponsored by House State Affairs Chairman Ken King, R-Canadian, comes three weeks after veterans, police, doctors, pediatricians, parents, scientists, and business owners testified past 3 a.m. at a contentious House hearing over the merits and risks of allowing the $8 billion industry to continue.
The House version
The House version of the bill could still wipe out half of the value of products on the market today. But it stops short of killing the industry altogether, allowing hemp specialty stores but banning the products from being sold in gas stations and vape shops. The bill bans all forms of smokable hemp except low-dose hemp flower – not high enough to be psychoactive – that’s grown naturally in Texas. It also bans hemp vapes, including those made with THCA and other derivatives.
The stores may sell tinctures and edibles, including gummies and drinks. The bill bans sales to customers under 21, requires child-resistant packaging, prohibits packaging that markets to kids, and includes other testing and regulatory requirements.
Taxes gathered on the products would be divided like this: Half to the TABC, one-quarter to accredited crime labs and the last quarter to opioid narcotic response services by law enforcement.
The Senate version
The Senate passed SB 3 as a total ban in early March on a 24-7 vote, one day after a video surfaced of Patrick going into a THC shop near a middle school in South Austin — the latest in a growing series of personal investigations the powerful lieutenant governor is doing this session. A shop employee is heard asking for his identification as the store requires customers to be at least 21.
SB 3 by Sen. Charles Perry, R-Lubbock, would criminalize the possession and manufacture of intoxicating legal products currently sold in smoke shops, convenience stores, breweries, coffee shops and online retailers.
Possession of the products would be a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to a year in jail and a fine of up to $4,000. Manufacturing them would be a third-degree felony, punishable by 2 to 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000.
Retailers would have until January to comply with the new law, which would not target the sale of the products containing cannabidiol (CBD) or Cannabigerol (CBG), two nonintoxicating hemp derivatives.
It would ban anything other than CBG and CBD. That includes all other consumable hemp products, such as cannabinol (CBN), which is also nonintoxicating and popular for uses such as sleep aids and anxiety.
CBD is federally approved for treating a form of childhood epilepsy, and medical evidence suggests it could treat anxiety disorders, pain, insomnia and possibly inflammation.
Perry has promised to deliver “the toughest THC ban in the nation.”
The fight ahead
If the 15-0 vote of the committee, made up of 9 Republicans and 6 Democrats, is any indicator, the House could stop it in its tracks.
“I appreciate you working on it, I know it’s a long time coming,” Rep. Dade Phelan, R-Beaumont, a member of the committee, told King right before the vote.
Supporters of the ban say that THC should only be legal in Texas for those who need it for medical needs, administer through health professionals, and can qualify through the state’s medical marijuana program, known as the Texas Compassionate Use Program.
Bills that would increase the number of dispensaries in that program – from 3 to 11 – allow for off-site storage of product, allow for smokable marijuana to be administered instead of just gummies and oils, and add more qualifying health conditions are awaiting committee and floor votes.
Prohibition would be a disappointing overreach that defies Texas’ pro-business values, supporters have said. They urge lawmakers to avoid killing an industry that has created about 50,000 jobs, according to market research.
The 2019 loophole
Hemp and marijuana plants are varieties of cannabis. In Texas, products containing THC from marijuana are illegal except for the narrow medical program.
Most THC products derived from hemp plants, however, are legal because of a 2019 state law that allows the farming and commercialization of hemp with trace amounts of THC.
Because the law was written for farmers, not retailers, it did not offer the restrictions present in other states’ consumable hemp programs, including strict third-party testing requirements and age limits on purchases.
The 2019 legislation limited the amount of delta-9 THC in hemp plants and products to no more than 0.3% by weight but did not place limits for any other hemp derivatives.
The law removed hemp from the state’s Controlled Substances Act, effectively legalizing all of its derivatives without potency limits on most of them.
In 2023, some lawmakers attempted to ban intoxicating hemp-based products but were unsuccessful.
Law enforcement has been at odds with retailers over the legality of the products because some tested after being sold contained illegally high levels of THC and products have been found in the possession of those younger than 21.
Texas
8 convicted of terrorism charges in Texas immigration center shooting sentenced to decades in prison
FORT WORTH, Texas (AP) — A demonstrator who shot and wounded a police officer outside a Texas immigration center last July 4 was sentenced to 100 years in federal prison Tuesday, while other protesters accused of having links to antifa were given multiple decades in federal prison.
Benjamin Song was convicted of attempted murder last March after prosecutors say he opened fire and wounded a police officer at the Prairieland Detention Center in Alvarado.
The seven other protesters sentenced Tuesday received prison terms ranging from 30 to 70 years.
“Our issue with this case has always been this isn’t a bunch of terrorists. This is a bunch of kids and young adults who really have a really big heart and really wanted their voice to be heard,” Philip Hayes, Song’s attorney, said outside the federal courthouse in Fort Worth. “It was never intended that anybody get hurt. It was never intended that any shots would be fired.”
He said his client would appeal the sentencing.
“Song, aside from this day, has had an impeccable life. A former Marine. A good student,” Hayes said. “He had a lot of good qualities that were just ignored. The judge went ahead and gave as much as he could.”
One of the defendants, Daniel Sanchez Estrada, was convicted of corruptly concealing a document and conspiracy to conceal documents. Others pleaded guilty to providing material support to terrorists rather than take their case to trial.
Prosecutors say the eight are members of antifa, a decentralized anti-fascist organization that has become a target of the Trump administration. They have denied any affiliation and maintain they attended the demonstration to show support for immigrants inside the detention center.
President Donald Trump last fall signed an executive order designating antifa a domestic terrorist organization, even though there is no domestic equivalent to the State Department’s list of foreign terror organizations.
Critics warn the case could have wide-reaching impact on protests given that organizations operating within the U.S. are supposed to be protected by First Amendment free-speech rights.
Short for “anti-fascists,” antifa is not a single organization but rather an umbrella term for far-left militant groups that confront or resist neo-Nazis and white supremacists at demonstrations.
Last week, federal prosecutors charged 15 people with impeding the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown in Minnesota. They claimed the demonstrators were members of antifa who conspired against the federal government to block arrests and deportations by setting up blockades around government buildings and throwing chunks of ice at federal vehicles, among other actions.
Marcelo reported from New York.
A free press is a cornerstone of a healthy democracy.
Support trusted journalism and civil dialogue.
Texas
Paxton, Trump adviser’s org win bid to block immigration rule
A federal judge in Texas blocked a Biden administration rule on Monday that allowed immigration judges to indefinitely close a deportation case against immigrants on the same day Texas sued to stop the rule.
The rule, which was adopted in 2024, allowed immigration judges to close a deportation case after hearing arguments from the federal government and the immigrant in deportation proceedings, especially if the person could qualify for a benefit that allows them to stay in the country legally.
But on Monday, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a lawsuit in the Northern District of Texas in Wichita Falls to block the rule with U.S. Judge Reed O’Connor, who was appointed by former President George W. Bush.
The lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice was also co-filed by America First Legal Foundation, an organization founded by Stephen Miller, a senior adviser to President Trump who has focused on ways to limit both legal and illegal immigration to the country. America First Legal Foundation also previously filed various lawsuits representing Paxton against the Biden administration’s immigration policies, which helped derail President Biden’s immigration agenda in his lone term.
In this latest complaint, Paxton’s office said in the 43-page lawsuit that the Biden-era rule “effectively grant(s) indefinite amnesty to aliens illegally present in this country.”
Lawsuits usually take several months to years to settle, but in this case O’Connor ruled late on Monday in favor of Texas after the Department of Justice filed its response saying it agreed with Paxton’s office.
Paxton’s office and the DOJ did not respond to immediate requests for comment.
President Trump, in keeping with his campaign promise, has cracked down on immigrants, using many of the federal government’s resources to limit immigration and fast-track deportations, including undocumented people and others who were allowed to be in the U.S. by previous administrations.
O’Connor has been known as conservative leaders’ favorite judge because he has routinely ruled in favor of Paxton, who has strategically filed lawsuits against the Obama and Biden administration.
The fast-paced end to the rule echoes a similar maneuver conducted by the DOJ and Paxton’s office last year, when the federal agency sued Texas over a law allowing undocumented students to qualify for lower tuition rates at public universities. Hours after the suit was filed, Texas also asked Judge O’Connor to find the law unconstitutional, which he did.
After the law was overturned, legal experts said a state working with the federal government so closely for the swift overturning of a state law was unusual and raised questions about collusion.
The quick resolution to the case late on Monday was heavily criticized by immigration law experts.
“This is madness! Deliberate collusion with a federal judge to rapidly erase regulations without any input from affected parties,” said Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow with American Immigration Council, a group in Washington, D.C., that advocates for immigrants. “It’s clearly an unlawful act by all, and now litigants will have to seek to intervene in the already-completed lawsuit to overturn his actions.”
Source link
Texas
US opens probe into fatal Tesla crash into Texas home
-
Los Angeles, Ca22 minutes agoAir quality concerns remain as the Boyle Heights warehouse fire continues to burn
-
Detroit, MI40 minutes agoWenceel Pérez returns home, but when will he return to Detroit Tigers?
-
San Francisco, CA52 minutes agoSan Francisco Supervisor Jackie Fielder to return following mental health leave
-
Dallas, TX55 minutes ago
Impact: How Jeffery Simmons’ extension could affect Quinnen Williams
-
Miami, FL60 minutes ago
Jaylen Brown bidding war? Haslem drove this? All the fallout from Antetokounmpo trade to Miami
-
Boston, MA1 hour agoYour next Uber ride in Boston could be a taxi
-
Denver, CO1 hour agoNuggets 2026 NBA mock draft tracker 2.0: What national experts predict Denver will do
-
Seattle, WA1 hour agoHow to watch Bosnia vs. Qatar in next Seattle World Cup match