Connect with us

South-Carolina

SC schools superintendent reflects on her 8 years in office

Published

on

SC schools superintendent reflects on her 8 years in office


COLUMBIA, S.C. (WCSC) – South Carolina’s public colleges will likely be below new management when outgoing Superintendent of Schooling Molly Spearman’s second time period involves an finish.

“It’s very tough to stroll away as a result of I’ve been so concerned in schooling coverage my whole profession, nevertheless it was time, and I’m at peace with it now and notice it’s time for another person to place their mark on schooling in South Carolina,” Spearman says.

For the final eight years, that individual has been Spearman, a former Saluda County instructor, state consultant and, by subsequent week, the previous state superintendent.

“Didn’t plan it, by no means set it as a aim to be state superintendent,” she says. “However I consider, in my religion, God was getting ready me with all of the various things and concepts so I’d be ready for this second in time, and I’m grateful that I used to be.”

Advertisement

Aside from her determination to retire, which Spearman stated was one of many hardest she has needed to make, she says she has confronted many different tough decisions.

“There have been quite a lot of them. All the work throughout COVID was very, very tough, so I’ll push that apart,” she says. “I feel among the selections that I made to enter college districts and take over administration or to shut a faculty as a result of I do know — my very own highschool was closed not lengthy after I graduated — so I understand how a lot individuals love their college and what it means to a neighborhood.”

However Spearman stands by these selections, saying obstacles like lowering enrollment and hassle discovering lecturers mixed with the proximity of different colleges, made the consolidations of 11 districts throughout South Carolina the fitting name.

Whereas she says the truthfully feels if she got the chance to return and do issues in another way, she wouldn’t change something, she says one in every of her selections was misunderstood. That, she says, was her option to not march alongside 1000’s of lecturers exterior the State Home in 2019 as they demanded higher working situations.

That day, which was a faculty day, Spearman as an alternative subbed in for an absent instructor within the Columbia space.

Advertisement

“I don’t remorse the choice. I nonetheless consider that it mustn’t have occurred throughout college hours, and I advised the group I’d be there if it occurred after hours, however I’d not help closing down colleges for that objective,” she says, acknowledging it did have an effect on her relationship with some lecturers.

“You understand, learn social media. Some are saying, ‘Good riddance, glad she’s gone.’ That form of hurts a little bit bit as a result of I understand how exhausting I’ve labored for lecturers all my life and what now we have been in a position to accomplish,” she says.

Amongst these accomplishments, she counts getting the statewide beginning wage for lecturers up from uless than $30,000 when she took workplace to $40,000 now, although she believes it ought to nonetheless be increased.

“I can say with little doubt that each determination I’ve made has been in the perfect curiosity of scholars,” she says.

Spearman touts securing tens of millions of {dollars} from the state legislature to exchange a lot of the state’s growing old college bus fleet, the nation’s oldest, after a number of buses caught fireplace with college students on board.

Advertisement

Within the final two years, she additionally persuaded lawmakers to place a whole lot of tens of millions extra within the state finances to rebuild and renovate old skool buildings in poorer and rural districts that lack the tax base to afford these upgrades on their very own.

“I hope that folk will see that, that Molly, when she was state superintendent, she tried to place an actual deal with the nice issues in public schooling and to offer alternatives, extra alternatives, for each scholar on this state, irrespective of the place they dwell to allow them to achieve success,” she says.

As her profession dedicated to that trigger now begins to come back to a detailed, she additionally is obvious about what she’s going to miss essentially the most.

“With the ability to stroll into a faculty and see the children and simply see how great these lecturers, how exhausting they’re working and the accomplishments that they’re making with their college students. It’s a stunning factor to see, while you stroll into a faculty and you’ll really feel the love and the help and the happiness,” she says.

Superintendent-elect Ellen Weaver will likely be sworn in on Jan. 11 throughout the governor’s inauguration on the State Home.

Advertisement

Spearman says she plans to get some relaxation and leisure together with her husband on a visit to Hawaii.



Source link

South-Carolina

Wooden South Carolina amusement park roller coaster left man paralyzed: lawsuit

Published

on

Wooden South Carolina amusement park roller coaster left man paralyzed: lawsuit


A ride at a historic Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, amusement park turned into a nightmare that left a man paralyzed, a North Carolina couple alleges in a lawsuit.

The couple, identified as Gangia Adhikari and husband Kul Sannyashi, said they visited the Family Kingdom Amusement Park July 23, 2021, and rode the wooden Swamp Fox Roller Coaster.

“While riding the roller coaster as a result of the negligence, carelessness, recklessness, willfulness and wantonness of the Defendants, Plaintiff’s husband suffered an acute injury to his spinal cord which caused quadriplegia,” the lawsuit, filed June 20, alleges.

MINNESOTA AMUSEMENT PARK STAYS OPEN WHILE CLOSING POPULAR RIDE AFTER UNPRECEDENTED FLOODING

Advertisement

Family Kingdom, a seaside amusement park in Myrtle Beach, S.C. (Jeffrey Greenberg/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)

The couple alleged the coaster was “extremely dangerous, more so than a typical roller coaster.” 

The lawsuit said Family Kingdom Amusement Park “failed to adequately warn customers” of the dangers the roller coaster could present to riders.

The lawsuit also alleged the amusement park failed to take precautions to ensure the ride would not cause serious injuries to its users.

Attorney Morgan Martin told The Sun News Sannyashi is in “horrible condition.”

Advertisement

“The allegation is that he gets on [the roller coaster] fine and then gets off as a quadriplegic,” Martin told the outlet. “It’s such a sad, sad day for that young man, who is just in horrible condition.”

BEAR EUTHANIZED AFTER INJURING TENNESSEE THEME PARK CONCESSION STAND EMPLOYEE

Sannyashi claimed he had to undergo operations that required expensive medical treatment, hospitalization and intensive care.

Rollercoaster

A North Carolina man is reportedly paralyzed after riding the popular Swamp Fox roller coaster at Myrtle Beach’s Family Kingdom Amusement Park. (Family Kingdom)

The lawsuit claims he requires 24-hour nursing assistance and suffers from extreme pain, mental anguish and depression due to his permanent injuries.

According to the lawsuit, Adhikari is suing for loss of companionship, fellowship, aid, assistance, company and more.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Fox News Digital has reached out to the Family Kingdom Amusement Park for comment.





Source link

Continue Reading

South-Carolina

Mary Elle Marchant, River Bluff native, crowned as Miss South Carolina Teen 2024 – ABC Columbia

Published

on

Mary Elle Marchant, River Bluff native, crowned as Miss South Carolina Teen 2024 – ABC Columbia


Photo Courtesy: Amanda Upton Photography

COLUMBIA, SC (WOLO) — The Miss South Carolina Scholarship Organization has crowned Miss River Bluff’s Teen, Mary Elle Marchant, as Miss South Carolina’s Teen 2024.

According to Gavin Smith with the organization, Marchant hails from Lexington, SC, and is an 18-year-old who recently graduated from River Bluff High School.

Performing a musical theatre dance to “I Hope I Get It” from “A Chorus Line to Life,” Marchant was a preliminary winner in the teen evening gown and teen talent award categories.

She received a $12,500 savings bond and will compete for the title of Miss America’s Outstanding Teen.

Advertisement

The Miss South Carolina Scholarship Organization also named four additional delegates as runners up in the 2024 Miss South Carolina’s Teen Competition:

First runner up: Miss Daniel Island’s Teen, Tess Ferm
Second runner up: Miss Columbia’s Teen, Le’Daviah Terry
Third runner up: Miss Greer High School’s Teen, Madison Harbin
Fourth runner up: Miss Greater Greer’s Teen, Lilykate Barbare

The Miss South Carolina 2024 competition will continue Saturday evening, beginning at 8 p.m.

Miss South Carolina 2024 will receive a $60,000 scholarship and will compete for the title of Miss America.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South-Carolina

Editorial: Long-awaited reform on how SC picks judges will help, but it doesn’t go far enough

Published

on

Editorial: Long-awaited reform on how SC picks judges will help, but it doesn’t go far enough


The reform measure the Legislature sent to Gov. Henry McMaster on Wednesday won’t solve the multitudinous problems with the way South Carolina picks judges.

The governor still won’t have anywhere near as much say as the Legislature in selecting the members of the third branch of government.

And lawyer-legislators still will retain inordinate sway over the careers of judges they practice before — creating the appearance if not the reality of preferential treatment.

Advertisement

But the bill — more than a year in the making and far longer than that in the needing — provides a good first step to addressing real and perceived flaws that threaten public confidence in our judicial system. We urge Mr. McMaster to sign it.

Editorial: Radical? Proposals to change how SC picks judges couldn't get any more modest

For the first time, it allows the governor to appoint some members to the Judicial Merit Selection Commission, which decides who legislators can elect or reelect to the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals and the Circuit and Family courts. Governors have never had any say in those elections, and they still won’t participate in the vote, but S.1046 lets the governor appoint four of the 12 commissioners.

House and Senate leaders will still pick the eight other members, and six of them have to be legislators; technically, the bill allows all eight to be legislators, which would ensure legislators’ continued majority on the panel, but if House or Senate leaders choose to interpret it that way, it will be a massive betrayal of the public trust.

Scoppe: How SC lawyer-legislators use their ‘immunity’ to keep criminals out of jail

Advertisement

Perhaps equally important, legislators will be limited to four consecutive years on the panel, and all but three current members will be expelled from the commission when the law takes effect in a year. Among those leaving will be House Democratic Leader Todd Rutherford, who has made himself the poster child for how lawyer-legislators can manipulate that position to their personal advantage. (Additionally, commissioners have to resign if a relative files to run for a judgeship.)

As long as the Legislature elects judges, the governor should appoint all the members of the screening panel; that’s the only way to create the balance of powers that is foundational to our nation’s system of governance. Barring that, lawyer-legislators should be prohibited from serving on the panel: One chance to influence who becomes a judge — when they vote in the election — is enough; that second opportunity is the root of most of the evil that South Carolina’s prosecutors have been complaining about for more than a year.

Editorial: Remove lawyer-legislators from judicial panel, before we hear more outrages

It’s worth noting that lawmakers agreed to give the governor some say on the commission at the very same moment they reduced the commission’s power: It still will be able to end the careers and the hopes of judges and would-be judges, but in most cases, it no longer will be able to nominate its favorites from among multiple qualified candidates. Now, instead of nominating a maximum of three candidates for each seat, the so-called cap will be six — which is more than the number of candidates in most contests — so if six candidates are found qualified, all six of them will stand for election.

The other smart reforms are a requirement that screening hearings be livestreamed and a related ban on candidates dropping out before the commission issues its report on their qualifications. Both are designed to stop the panel from pressuring candidates to drop out after screening by suggesting that the public will see unflattering material about them if they don’t.

Advertisement

Scoppe: Is it a coincidence the folks who pick judges fare so well in court?

As Upstate Solicitor Kevin Brackett tells us, “This is helpful, but some of the main structures that ensure legislative dominance are still in place and need to be addressed.” That means getting lawyer-legislators off the screening commission and, ideally, allowing the governor to appoint all 12 members. It’s not too soon to start working on that next round of reforms.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending