Connect with us

South-Carolina

After going years without an earthquake more tremors have hit this part of South Carolina

Published

on

After going years without an earthquake more tremors have hit this part of South Carolina


For the second time in less than a week, an earthquake hit South Carolina.

A 2.1 magnitude earthquake was recorded Sunday morning in McCormick County, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. Not only was it South Carolina’s second confirmed earthquake in a six day span, it also was recorded near the same part of the Palmetto State where the previous quake occurred.

Sunday’s earthquake was confirmed at 2:53 a.m. near Jackson, the South Carolina Emergency Management Division said.

The earthquake happened about half 3.5 miles beneath the surface, according to the USGS.

Advertisement

This was the 12th confirmed earthquake this year in South Carolina, after 28 quakes were recorded in 2023, according to the state Department of Natural Resources.

The last time seismic activity was recorded in South Carolina was on Aug. 26, when tremors were recorded as a 1.9 magnitude earthquake hit in the Jackson area of Aiken County, state Department of Natural Resources data shows.

This was the first earthquake recorded in McCormick County since May 25, 2019, and it’s only the third time since 2006 that seismic activity has been confirmed there, according to the USGS.

History of earthquakes in SC

It has been uncommon for earthquakes to hit outside of the Midlands area of the Palmetto State, specifically beyond Kershaw County, where 62 earthquakes have been confirmed since the end of June 2022, according to the South Carolina DNR.

That’s also where South Carolina’s most powerful recent earthquakes were recorded on June 29, 2022.

Advertisement

On that day, two earthquakes — one a 3.5 magnitude and the other 3.6 — were included in a flurry of tremors and aftershocks. Those were the two largest quakes to hit South Carolina in nearly a decade. A 4.1-magnitude quake struck McCormick County in 2014.

Anyone who felt tremors and shaking or heard rumbling from Sunday morning’s earthquake can report it to the USGS.

The South Carolina Emergency Management Division map of fault lines in the Palmetto State where there has been a swarm of earthquakes.

The South Carolina Emergency Management Division map of fault lines in the Palmetto State where there has been a swarm of earthquakes.

The most recent earthquake means at least 116 have been detected in the Palmetto State since the start of 2022, according to South Carolina DNR. All but 13 of the quakes have been in the Midlands.

In all, 108 earthquakes have hit the Columbia area since a 3.3-magnitude quake was recorded Dec. 27, 2021, according to the DNR.

The S.C. Emergency Management Division said Sunday morning’s earthquake was classified as a micro quake, according to the Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale.

Advertisement

No major damage or injuries have been reported from any of the recent quakes.

Earthquakes that register 2.5 magnitude or less often go unnoticed and are usually recorded only by a seismograph, according to Michigan Technological University. Any quake less than 5.5 magnitude is not likely to cause significant damage, the school said.

It had been typical for South Carolina to have between six and 10 earthquakes a year, the S.C. Geological Survey previously reported. There have been 130 earthquakes in South Carolina since Jan. 18, 2021, according to DNR.

During a 2022 town hall to address the earthquakes, state geologist Scott Howard said as many as 200 smaller tremors might have gone unnoticed and unrecorded.

Why the increase in earthquakes?

An explanation for the outburst has eluded scientists.

Advertisement

Some experts have theorized there’s a link between the Wateree River and the earthquakes northeast of Columbia. They said the combination of a single moderate earthquake in December 2022 and high water levels in the Wateree River during parts of 2022 and 2023 have contributed to the earthquakes.

But no one has settled on the single cause for the Midlands’ shaking.

Elgin, about 20 miles northeast of Columbia and situated on a fault line, experienced an unusual earthquake “swarm,” leaving some residents feeling uneasy.

The series of quakes might be the longest period of earthquake activity in the state’s history, officials said. But they don’t believe the spate of minor earthquakes is an indicator that a bigger quake could be on the way.

“Though the frequency of these minor earthquakes may alarm some, we do not expect a significantly damaging earthquake in South Carolina at this time, even though we know our state had them decades ago,” South Carolina EMD Director Kim Stenson previously said in a news release.

Advertisement

“Now is the time to review your insurance policies for earthquake coverage, secure any items in your home that may become hazards during a tremor and remember to drop, cover and hold on until the shaking passes. These are the precautions South Carolinians can take to properly prepare for earthquakes.”

The strongest earthquake ever recorded in South Carolina — and on the East Coast of the United States — was a devastating 7.3 in Charleston in 1886.

That quake killed 60 people and was felt over 2.5 million square miles, from Cuba to New York and Bermuda to the Mississippi River, according to the state EMD.

Reported earthquakes in SC in 2021-24

Date/Location

Magnitude

Advertisement

Depth (km)

2021

Jan. 18/Dalzell

2.1

6.9

Advertisement

Feb. 13/Summerville

2.1

5.1

May 12/Heath Springs

1.8

Advertisement

9.99

May 31/Summit

2.6

1.7

May 31/Summit

Advertisement

2.0

5.1

July 16/Ladson

2.0

4.0

Advertisement

July 22/Ladson

1.3

3.5

July 22/Ladson

1.95

Advertisement

3.97

Aug. 21/Centerville

1.75

1.97

Aug. 21/Centerville

Advertisement

1.71

3.37

Sept. 27/Summerville

2.8

6.0

Advertisement

Sept. 27/Summerville

2.0

5.8

Sept. 27/Centerville

3.3

Advertisement

6.8

Oct. 25/Jenkinsville

2.2

3.8

Oct. 26/Jenkinsville

Advertisement

1.8

0.0

Oct. 28/Jenkinsville

1.8

1.8

Advertisement

Oct. 28/Jenkinsville

1.7

0.0

Oct. 28/Jenkinsville

2.1

Advertisement

4.2

Oct. 31/Jenkinsville

2.3

0.1

Nov. 1/Jenkinsville

Advertisement

2.0

5.1

Nov. 9/Centerville

1.5

3.8

Advertisement

Nov. 16/Arial

2.2

5.4

Dec. 20/Ladson

1.1

Advertisement

2.8

Dec. 27/Lugoff

3.3

3.2

Dec. 27/Lugoff

Advertisement

2.5

2.4

Dec. 27/Elgin

2.1

0.7

Advertisement

Dec. 27/Lugoff

1.7

4.9

Dec. 29/Elgin

2.3

Advertisement

1.6

Dec. 30/Elgin

2.5

2.5

Dec. 30/Elgin

Advertisement

2.4

3.8

2022

Jan. 3/Lugoff

2.5

Advertisement

2.7

Jan. 5/Lugoff

2.6

0.5

Jan. 5/Lugoff

Advertisement

1.5

7.0

Jan. 9/Ladson

1.4

2.9

Advertisement

Jan. 11/Elgin

1.7

5.4

Jan. 11/Lugoff

2.0

Advertisement

3.2

Jan. 11/Elgin

1.3

5.0

Jan. 15/Elgin

Advertisement

1.8

3.5

Jan. 19/Elgin

1.9

5.0

Advertisement

Jan. 21/Elgin

1.9

4.8

Jan. 27/Lugoff

2.1

Advertisement

1.0

Feb. 2/Elgin

1.5

3.9

March 4/Elgin

Advertisement

1.8

2.8

March 9/Elgin

2.2

3.6

Advertisement

March 11/Camden

2.1

1.2

March 27/Lugoff

2.1

Advertisement

1.9

March 28/Centerville

0.9

2.9

April 7/Elgin

Advertisement

2.0

2.9

April 8/Centerville

1.6

3.6

Advertisement

April 22/Ladson

1.1

3.5

April 22/Taylors

2.2

Advertisement

2.3

May 9/Elgin

3.3

3.1

May 9/Elgin

Advertisement

1.6

2.9

May 9/Elgin

1.78

4.1

Advertisement

May 9/Elgin

2.1

3.7

May 9/Elgin

2.9

Advertisement

5.6

May 10/Elgin

2.3

3.9

May 10/Elgin

Advertisement

2.8

6.2

May 19/Elgin

1.8

2.5

Advertisement

May 21/Elgin

1.9

5.6

June 26/Elgin

1.88

Advertisement

4.09

June 29/Elgin

3.5

2.64

June 29/Elgin

Advertisement

1.88

2.92

June 29/Elgin

3.6

2.95

Advertisement

June 29/Elgin

1.79

2.07

June 29/Elgin

1.51

Advertisement

3.72

June 29/Elgin

1.46

1.93

June 29/Elgin

Advertisement

2.06

2.22

June 30/Elgin

2.32

3.09

Advertisement

June 30/Elgin

1.44

2.8

June 30/Elgin

2.03

Advertisement

3.11

June 30/Elgin

2.15

2.56

June 30/Elgin

Advertisement

2.06

1.92

June 30/Elgin

1.49

2.46

Advertisement

July 1/Elgin

1.55

3.37

July 1/Elgin

2.11

Advertisement

3.83

July 1/Elgin

1.26

3.3

July 1/Elgin

Advertisement

1.68

4.02

July 2/Elgin

2.09

1.65

Advertisement

July 3/Elgin

1.9

2.1

July 3/Lugoff

1.6

Advertisement

3.2

July 3/Elgin

1.4

1.96

July 3/Elgin

Advertisement

1.1

5.0

July 7/Elgin

2.1

4.0

Advertisement

July 8/Elgin

1.6

2.5

July 8/Elgin

1.4

Advertisement

3.8

July 14/Elgin

1.3

2.5

July 15/Elgin

Advertisement

1.6

3.3

July 18/Elgin

1.2

3.2

Advertisement

July 19/Elgin

2.2

1.8

July 19/Elgin

2.1

Advertisement

3.2

July 24/Lugoff

2.3

2.4

July 25/Lugoff

Advertisement

2.1

2.2

July 30/Elgin

1.8

3.6

Advertisement

July 31/Elgin

1.7

1.6

Aug. 3/Elgin

1.8

Advertisement

3.0

Aug. 9/Boykin

1.6

6.9

Aug. 15/Elgin

Advertisement

1.5

3.6

Aug. 18/Homeland Park

2.1

0.03

Advertisement

Aug. 27/Elgin

1.3

2.4

Sept. 1/Centerville

1.5

Advertisement

0.7

Sept. 21/Elgin

1.9

3.2

Sept. 22/Lugoff

Advertisement

1.4

1.5

Oct. 14/Elgin

1.3

4.2

Advertisement

Oct. 30/Elgin

2.5

0.02

Nov. 24/Elgin

2.0

Advertisement

3.5

Dec. 9/Elgin

1.7

2.4

2023

Advertisement

Jan. 10/Hopkins

1.9

6.0

Jan. 18/Centerville

1.4

Advertisement

8.8

Jan. 20/Lugoff

1.8

4.5

Feb. 17/Cayce

Advertisement

1.9

5.0

Feb. 17/Elgin

2.4

2.4

Advertisement

Feb. 28/Elgin

1.3

2.5

March 27/Winnsboro

1.4

Advertisement

4.5

April 4/Cross Anchor

1.6

11.5

June 5/Elgin

Advertisement

1.72

3.6

June 20/Elgin

2.0

3.4

Advertisement

July 24/Ladson

2.5

6.4

Aug. 3/Six Mile

1.9

Advertisement

5.6

Aug. 5/Summerville

1.72

4.83

Oct. 6/Kershaw County

Advertisement

2.2

2.9

Oct. 9/Elgin

1.68

4.67

Advertisement

Nov. 17/Jenkinsville

1.8

3.4

Nov. 19/Jenkinsville

1.7

Advertisement

11.6

Nov. 21/Jenkinsville

1.6

5.4

Nov. 26/Jenkinsville

Advertisement

2.2

4.0

Nov. 26/Jenkinsville

2.09

6.34

Advertisement

Nov. 27/Jenkinsville

1.86

5.67

Nov. 29/Jenkinsville

2.0

Advertisement

4.6

Nov. 29/Jenkinsville

2.01

1.8

Nov. 30/Jenkinsville

Advertisement

2.41

2.87

Dec. 13/Jenkinsville

1.6

6.41

Advertisement

Dec. 22/Lugoff

2.2

2.4

Dec. 28/Jenkinsville

1.8

Advertisement

1.6

Dec. 30/Elgin

2.1

4.4

2024

Advertisement

Jan. 8/Elgin

2.1

3.2

Feb. 6/Lugoff

1.7

Advertisement

1.7

March 9/Elgin

2.83

2.86

March 9/Elgin

Advertisement

1.3

1.5

March 17/Elgin

1.9

2.9

Advertisement

March 24/Elgin

2.1

4.9

March 27/Elgin

2.2

Advertisement

6

April 6/Jenkinsville

1.2

5.1

June 11/Lesslie

Advertisement

2.2

2.8

Aug. 9/Elgin

2.3

3.9

Advertisement

Aug. 26/Jackson

1.9

0.7

Sept. 1/Parksville

2.1

Advertisement

5.6





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

South-Carolina

South Carolina looking to limit production of Missouri's star wide receivers

Published

on

South Carolina looking to limit production of Missouri's star wide receivers


South Carolina, like it has in past weeks, will prepare its defense for the possibility of two different quarterbacks taking the field when it faces Missouri on Saturday.

Brady Cook, who has been the Tigers’ starter for much of the 2024 campaign, is listed as doubtful for this weekend’s game, per the team’s latest injury report. Drew Pyne will play in Cook’s stead should he be unable to suit up.

[GamecockCentral: $1 for 7 days and 50% off first year]

But head coach Shane Beamer said the Gamecocks must also be prepared for Missouri’s wide receivers, regardless of who is under center.

Advertisement

“They have arguably the best receiving corps in this conference when you talk about Luther Burden, who will be a top-10 pick in the NFL Draft, and Theo Wease, who took over that game last week against Oklahoma in the fourth quarter,” Beamer said.

Burden has been a dangerous threat to opposing defenses long before this season began. He was among the SEC’s top wideouts in 2023, finishing third in receiving yards behind only Malik Nabers and Xavier Legette. Over the course of 13 games, Burden caught a team-high 86 passes for 1,212 yards and nine touchdowns. That strong play led to him earning All-SEC First Team honors, in addition to being named a Second Team All-American by the Associated Press and CBS Sports.

The start of the 2024 campaign has been less productive for Burden, though. He has been limited to just 505 receiving yards and four touchdowns on 45 receptions in his first nine contests. Burden has yet to record 100-plus yards in a game this season, something he did six times last year.

Despite Burden’s downtick in yardage, he remains a key part of Missouri’s offense. And Beamer said the Tigers have found creative ways to keep him involved on that side of the football.

“They get the ball to Burden in a lot of different ways, whether it be handing the ball off to him on a fourth-and-one the other night against Oklahoma on a jet sweep. Or, they get in an unbalanced formation, and he’s off the ball to the field, and they motion him in, motion him out, and he runs an out-and-up for a 50-yard touchdown,” Beamer said. “They just find different ways to get the ball in his hands.”

Advertisement

[On3 App: Get South Carolina push notifications from GamecockCentral]

While Burden is a familiar face for Beamer, Wease was on the same sideline as Beamer at one point. Wease spent the first four years of his college football career at Oklahoma. For two of those seasons, Beamer served as the Sooners’ assistant head coach and tight ends coach.

Wease caught 49 passes for 682 yards and six scores during his first season with the Tigers in 2023. And he is well on his way to surpassing those totals this year. He has recorded 552 yards and three touchdowns across 41 total catches.

Wease’s physical attributes make him a difficult player to defend, Beamer said.

“Wease is a really big receiver, also. He’ll catch a ball, and then he does a really good job of getting vertical,” Beamer said. “He’s a hard guy to bring down. He’s a twitchy, shifty, tall, big, athletic guy.”

Advertisement

Beamer understands that holding either Burden or Wease to zero catches will be a tall task. But keeping them from turning routine plays into big gains will be a key to success for South Carolina’s defense.

“They’re going to get their catches. It’d be great if I looked at the stat sheet after the game Saturday night, and they didn’t have any catches. Is that realistic? Probably not. What we’ve got to do is do a really good job tackling. “It’s really impressive watching those two guys, what they do once they catch the ball,” Beamer said.

“Let’s limit their catches. But when they do catch the ball, make sure we’re limiting what they do (with) yards after the catch and after contact.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South-Carolina

Toxin was released into the Congaree River in South Carolina: Agencies did little to stop it, greens say

Published

on

Toxin was released into the Congaree River in South Carolina: Agencies did little to stop it, greens say


High amounts of a toxic chemical are being discharged into the Congaree and Cooper rivers from plastics factories in South Carolina, but state and federal regulators are doing little to control the pollution, a new report says.

A study by the Environmental Integrity Project, a national public interest organization, found that of eight similar plastics plants it studied, factories near Columbia and Charleston had some of the highest releases of 1,4- dioxane, a chemical tied to an array of health ailments, including cancer.

An Alpek Polyester plant in the Gaston area near Columbia released 23,728 pounds of 1,4-dioxane to the Congaree River in 2022, ranking it second in total releases behind only a plant in West Virginia that discharged 29,960 pounds. Alpek’s plant at Moncks Corner near Charleston released 9,756 pounds to the Cooper River, the report said.

But according to the report, there are no federal limits on how much 1,4-dioxane can be released from plastics plants. West Virginia only recently added state discharge limits for the plant in that state, the study said.

Advertisement

“This toxic pollution from plastic production is unacceptable,” Congaree Riverkeeper Bill Stangler said in a statement released by the Environmental Integrity Project. “Our federal and state agencies need to step up and protect our river and the downstream communities.”

Efforts to reach someone who could speak for Alpek were unsuccessful. The company, formerly known as DAK Americas, is part a corporation that employs nearly 4,000 people worldwide. At one time, the plant in the Gaston area had about 400 workers.

The S.C. Department of Environmental Services did not respond to questions on Thursday from The State, saying it could not discuss the 1,4-dioxane issue until a later date.

Stangler said the releases in the Columbia area are near Congaree National Park, a preserve filled with wildlife and the state’s only national park. The Alpek discharges to the Congaree River are below drinking water intakes in Columbia, West Columbia and Cayce, but Stangler said they are upstream from several drinking water pipes in the Santee Cooper lakes area southeast of Columbia.

The Environmental Integrity Project report, released Thursday, took a broader look at various discharges in wastewater released from 70 petrochemical and plastic plants that produce plastics across the country. The group focused on plastics because the industry is growing across the country. The plants were those that produced plastic materials for other plastic products.

Advertisement

Most of the plants studied in the United States have few, if any, government limits on the amount of nitrogen, phosphorus, 1,4-dioxane, dioxins and other harmful pollutants discharged to rivers, the report said. The group’s study included data from the federal Toxics Release Inventory, an annual report that lists what the U.S. government considers legal pollution discharges.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says exposure to high levels of 1,4 dioxane can result in liver and kidney damage. Although the EPA was criticized for not doing enough to control discharges to rivers from plastics plants, the agency has said 1,4 dioxane is a probable human carcinogen.

In addition to concerns about 1,4-dioxane in South Carolina, the report questioned the environmental impacts of “nurdles,” tiny pellets used to manufacture other plastic materials. It said discharges of these materials into waterways are common. In 2021, a pellet packaging and shipping company settled a lawsuit for $1.2 million over nurdle releases to Charleston Harbor.

Discover the latest in science, tech, and space with over 100,000 subscribers who rely on Phys.org for daily insights.
Sign up for our free newsletter and get updates on breakthroughs,
innovations, and research that matter—daily or weekly.

Environmental Integrity Project officials and others said the EPA needs to establish rules overseeing plastics pollution to rein in the environmental threat to rivers and drinking water across the country. They specifically called for requiring modern wastewater pollution controls at plastics plants, tightening rules for the release of plastic pellets and requiring better monitoring for 1,4-dioxane in water. The report also called on the EPA and state agencies to step up enforcement.

Advertisement

Whether any of that will happen is a big question.

The report took President Joe Biden’s administration to task for not doing enough about plastics discharges, but Biden has generally had a favorable environmental record. President-elect Donald Trump has pledged to cut environmental regulations he says are hampering businesses.

During a news conference Thursday, Environmental Integrity Project director Jen Duggan said the government is mandated to enforce the Clean Water Act. Her organization maintains the federal government has not updated standards to limit water pollution from the plastics industry, as is required by law. She said courts generally have been unsympathetic to agencies that don’t follow the law.

“What’s important here is no matter what Trump’s plans are, Trump can not unilaterally waive away these kinds of mandatory, statutory requirements,” Duggan said. “This is a must-do under the statute and courts have generally had little patience for agencies that don’t comply with these kinds of mandatory obligations. The Clean Water Act has a very clear mandate to update these water pollution standards to keep pace with technology.”

She and others at the news conference suggested that more citizens’ lawsuits could be filed against the EPA. A citizens’ suit is a legal action that a person or organization can take if the government is not enforcing environmental laws.

Advertisement

“During the first Trump administration, we did see a pretty significant dip in the amount of enforcement cases that the EPA brought,” Duggan said. “So we do think that it will be very important for (environmental) groups … to fill that gap and hold these polluters accountable.”

The group’s findings about 1,4-dioxane being released in South Carolina aren’t isolated to plants along the Congaree and Cooper rivers.

Separately, a non-profit legal service has sued Fiber Industries LLC, a polyester manufacturer, over discharges of 1,4 dioxane to Black Creek, a well-known river in Darlington County east of Columbia.

The Southern Environmental Law Center, which represents four environmental organizations, is trying to stop what it says are excessive discharges to the creek. Reports examined by law center attorneys show the plant has discharged 1,4-dioxane into Black Creek at amounts 25,000 times higher than a safe drinking water standard, records show.

The Environmental Integrity Project report’s look at the Alpek factories in South Carolina said plastic plants, particularly those making a type of material known as PET, produce ample amounts of 1,4-dioxane. The PET material, formally known as polyethylene terephthalate plastic, is used to manufacture bottles and polyester fibers, the study said.

Advertisement

Overall, of the eight similar plastics facilities the report looked at, four of them produced 98% of the 1,4-dioxane pollution, including the plants in the Columbia and Charleston areas. Another plant in South Carolina, located in Spartanburg, was eighth on the list.

2024 The State. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Citation:
Toxin was released into the Congaree River in South Carolina: Agencies did little to stop it, greens say (2024, November 15)
retrieved 15 November 2024
from https://phys.org/news/2024-11-toxin-congaree-river-south-carolina.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

South-Carolina

Arias scores 19, Jacksonville takes down South Carolina State 71-62

Published

on

Arias scores 19, Jacksonville takes down South Carolina State 71-62


Associated Press

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. (AP) — Chris Arias had 19 points in Jacksonville’s 71-62 win over South Carolina State on Thursday night.

Arias went 7 of 9 from the field (5 for 6 from 3-point range) for the Dolphins (2-2). Zach Bell scored 18 points while going 7 of 14 (4 for 6 from 3-point range) and added eight rebounds. Robert McCray, Kendall Munson and Zimi Nwokeji all had nine points.

Advertisement

Omar Croskey finished with 15 points, six rebounds and three steals for the Bulldogs (2-2). Drayton Jones added 12 points for South Carolina State. Mitchel Taylor finished with 10 points and two steals.

___

The Associated Press created this story using technology provided by Data Skrive and data from Sportradar.




Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending