Connect with us

North Carolina

Trump plans to address national security in Asheboro, his second visit to NC in a week

Published

on

Trump plans to address national security in Asheboro, his second visit to NC in a week


Former President Donald Trump plans to talk about national security when he visits North Carolina on Wednesday, highlighting an area where he has substantially more experience — but has also courted more controversy — than his Democratic rival, Vice President Kamala Harris.

The former president attracted criticism among former intelligence and national security officials for isolationist policies and for appearing to cozy up to leaders of foreign adversaries. Before this year’s primary elections, his former national security advisor called Trump’s style of governance a threat to national security.

Trump was also charged with endangering national security by taking classified military documents after losing the 2020 election to Joe Biden. The government’s case against Trump was dismissed last month by a Trump-appointed federal judge. The U.S. Department of Justice under Biden is seeking to reinstate the charges.

Most Republicans are expected to support Trump in November. But the speech, to be held in Asheboro, comes as Democrats and former Republicans who oppose Trump seek to woo national security-minded unaffiliated voters and Republicans in a state with some of the nation’s biggest military installations. It’s Trump’s second North Carolina visit in a week; he was previously in Asheville to talk about the economy.

Advertisement

North Carolina Republican Party leaders have sought to boost Trump by knocking Biden.

Chairman Jason Simmons said Tuesday that Biden has done a poor job of conducting foreign policy, and he wants Trump back.

And as Democrats are now seeking to play up the role Harris has played in Biden’s administration on issues including foreign policy — an arena in which the former U.S. senator and state attorney general from California has limited experience — Republicans are likewise seeking to tie her to their criticisms of Biden.

“We saw in the last three-and-a-half years the chaos that Kamala Harris and Joe Biden put on us, on this country,” Simmons said. “Especially what we’ve seen with our country, where we have a broken economy, a broken border and a broken world. Where we see Iran being able to, with its proxies, invade and being able to bomb Israel, one of our best partners in the Middle East. We have Russia and Ukraine, and China, watching the whole time. We are scared.”

A top Biden administration official, U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, told WRAL in advance of Trump’s Asheboro speech that he has watched Harris engage in foreign policy in her role as vice president. He said she’s done a good job helping rebuild relationships with world leaders who became more cautious of the U.S., following Trump’s presidency.

Advertisement

“I’ve sat at her side as she engaged leaders from around the world, and has done a lot already to restore the respect for the US that was badly undermined during the Trump years,” Buttigieg said. “And that’s going to be especially important in things like defending democracy against the aggression of Vladimir Putin.”

A Pew Research Center survey in 2023 found America’s image in foreign countries has improved since Biden took over for Trump — and not just in Europe, but also Asia, Africa and South America.

Immigration as national security risk

As Trump seeks to return to office, he has sought to engage voters by broadening the scope of national security — which traditionally has focused on foreign policy issues — to include immigration enforcement at the country’s Southern border. For instance, Trump falsely claimed last year that Islamist terrorists are “pouring” across the border.

“He tries to make immigration the No. 1 national security risk,” Meredith College political science professor David McLennan said ahead of Trump’s speech. “He talks about it as being more significant than any international foe that we might think about. So he talks about drugs coming across the border, gangs coming across the border, ISIS coming across the border.”

Immigration is a key issue for conservative voters; a WRAL News poll in March found it was the single biggest issue for Republicans this year, beating out the economy for the top spot.

Advertisement

It’s possible that GOP officials are trying to take an issue their base is highly engaged in and tie it to national security — an issue some Trump opponents see as one of his biggest weaknesses.

“Among his supporters, that’s national security,” McLennan said of Trump’s immigration talking points.

Former Republican strategist Rick Wilson, who has become one of the nation’s leading “Never Trump” voices through his group The Lincoln Project, told WRAL earlier this month his group is preparing to start targeting what he calls “national security Republicans” in North Carolina. The state has an above-average population of veterans; Fayetteville and Jacksonville are home to two of the world’s largest military bases in the U.S. Army’s Fort Liberty and the U.S. Marine Corps’ Camp Lejeune.

The Lincoln Project messaging, Wilson said, will be aimed at veterans and fans of Reagan-era foreign policy with ads about Trump’s isolationist foreign policy stances, relationship with Putin and his comments about veterans.

Trump has repeatedly been accused of mocking or criticizing veterans killed in action or taken prisoner, including by his former White House Chief of Staff John Kelly. Most recently Trump downplayed the Congressional Medal of Honor, saying that since many soldiers who receive it are dead or maimed, it pales in comparison to a different award that’s often given to celebrities, athletes and politicians.

Advertisement

Wednesday’s speech offers Trump a chance to ask voters to look past his more controversial statements and scandals, and instead trust that he’ll deliver the kind of stances they want to see in a president, said Chris Cooper, a Western Carolina University political scientist.

“He needs to lay out a plan,” Cooper said. “He needs to stay on message. He needs to be a little more disciplined. I think the possibility is there. It’s an area where voters, on average, trust the Republican Party more.”

Trump’s record as president

Trump’s one term as president was notable for the departures he took from standard U.S. foreign policy. He was a frequent critic of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and he has indicated that if reelected he will pull the U.S. out of NATO — unless European members of the alliance pay more money into its operations.

The dissolution of NATO is considered a key goal of Putin. So, too, is Trump’s repeated indication that he might end U.S. aid to Ukraine if he returns to the White House, amid that country’s invasion by Russia.

In the early days of Trump’s presidency, he faced criticism from Democrats and Republicans alike after allegedly revealing highly classified military intelligence to Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Kislyak. Trump was also pressured into firing his first national security advisor, retired Gen. Michael Flynn, for Flynn lying about separate conversations he had with Kislyak. Flynn later pleaded guilty to a felony as part of the probe into Trump’s Russian ties by Special Counsel Robert Mueller. Former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort was also convicted as part of that probe. Trump pardoned both men after losing the 2020 election.

Advertisement

In the Middle East, Trump presided over military actions that led to the deaths of ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and top Iranian general Qasem Soleimani. The latter assassination was praised by foreign policy hawks; it has also coincided with Iran becoming more aggressive in backing attacks against international shipping via its allies in the Yemen-based Houthi movement, and also against U.S. ally Israel via Hamas, the Iranian-backed group that rules the Gaza Strip.

Trump also signed a peace treaty with the Taliban during his final year in office, paving the way toward the eventual withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan during Biden’s first year in office — an act that saw the end of America’s 20-year-long military presence in the country. The withdrawal also drew criticism as being rushed and chaotic, particularly after suicide bombers killed 13 U.S. military members and dozens of Afghan civilians during the final days of America’s military presence there.

McLennan said he’ll be interested to watch whether Harris focuses on other issues as she goes up against Trump for the presidency, or if she leans into highlighting their differences on foreign policy. Harris is expected to accept the Democratic Party’s nomination for president during this week’s Democratic National Convention in Chicago.

“Biden had some problems with the military because of the Afghanistan withdrawal and some other topics,” he said. “Harris tends to not be very vocal, and that’s what I’m watching for in her nomination acceptance speech: Does she talk at all about national security? Or is she going to give Trump that space?”

Laura Leslie, Jack Hagel, Brian Murphy and Paul Specht of the WRAL state government team contributed reporting.

Advertisement



Source link

North Carolina

Statewide tornado drill has NC schools and workplaces practicing safety

Published

on

Statewide tornado drill has NC schools and workplaces practicing safety


Wednesday, March 4, 2026 6:41PM

NC schools and businesses encouraged to practice tornado safety

RALEIGH, N.C. (WTVD) — North Carolina schools and businesses took part in a statewide tornado drill Wednesday morning as part of Severe Weather Awareness Week.

The National Weather Service led the drill at 9:30 a.m., broadcasting it on NOAA Weather Radio and the Emergency Alert System. Schools, workplaces and households across the state were encouraged to join in.

The National Weather Service didn’t issue a follow up alert to mark the end of the drill. Instead, each school or business wrapped up once they felt they had practiced the procedures thoroughly.

Wednesday’s drill also replaced the regular weekly NOAA Weather Radio test.

Advertisement

SEE | New warning for parents amid new ‘fire-breathing’ social media trend

Make sure to download the ABC 11 Mobile App ABC11 North Carolina Apps for Connected TV, Mobile News, Echo

Copyright © 2026 WTVD-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Carolina

North Carolina Rep. Valerie Foushee holds narrow lead over challenger Nida Allam

Published

on

North Carolina Rep. Valerie Foushee holds narrow lead over challenger Nida Allam


Nida Allam in 2022; Rep. Valerie Foushee (D-NC) in 2025.

Jonathan Drake/Reuters; Andrew Harnik/Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Jonathan Drake/Reuters; Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

Incumbent Rep. Valerie Foushee holds a narrow lead over challenger Nida Allam in the Democratic primary for North Carolina’s 4th Congressional district as ballots continue to be counted.

In a race seen as an early test of whether Democratic voters desire generational change within the party, Foushee holds a lead of just over 1,000 votes with 99% of results in so far, according to the Associated Press.

Advertisement

Under state law, provisional votes will be counted in the coming days in a district that includes Durham and Chapel Hill. If the election results end up within a 1% margin, Allam could request a recount.

Successfully ousting an incumbent lawmaker is often extremely difficult and rare. However, there have been recent upsets in races as some voters are calling for new leaders and several sitting members of Congress face primary challengers this cycle.

Allam, a 32-year-old Durham County Commissioner, is running to the left of Foushee, 69, framing her candidacy as part of a broader rejection of longtime Democratic norms.

On the campaign trail, Allam ran on an anti-establishment message, pledging to be a stronger fighter than Foushee in Congress, both in standing up against President Trump’s agenda and when pushing for more ambitious policy.

Advertisement

“North Carolina is a purple state that often gets labeled red, but we’re not a red state,” she told NPR in an interview last month, emphasizing the need to address affordability concerns. “We are a state of working-class folks who just want their elected officials to champion the issues that are impacting them.”

She drew a contrast with the congresswoman on immigration, voicing support for abolishing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Foushee has declined to go that far, advocating instead for ICE to be defunded and for broader reforms to the federal immigration system.

Allam also clashed with Foushee over U.S. policy towards Israel. As a vocal opponent of Israel’s war in Gaza, Allam swore off campaign donations from pro-Israel lobbying groups, such as AIPAC, and repeatedly criticized Foushee for previously accepting such funds.

Though Foushee announced last year that she would not accept AIPAC donations this cycle, she and Allam continued to spar over the broader role of outside spending in the race.

Their matchup comes four years after the candidates first squared off in 2022, when Allam lost to Foushee in what became the most expensive primary in the state’s history, with outside groups spending more than $3.8 million.

Advertisement

However, this year is poised to break that record. Outside groups have reported spending more than $4.4 million on the primary matchup, according to Federal Election Commission filings.

WUNC’s Colin Campbell contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

Building for tomorrow’s storms: North Carolina updates flood strategy

Published

on

Building for tomorrow’s storms: North Carolina updates flood strategy


North Carolina is beginning to plan for floods that have not happened yet.

State officials this year advanced the next phase of the state’s Flood Resiliency Blueprint, incorporating updated modeling that factors in heavier rainfall, future development and sea-level rise — a shift away from relying solely on historic data and FEMA’s regulatory maps.

“We can make decisions and plan for that future, not just the exposure to flooding that we see now,” said Stuart Brown, who manages the Flood Resiliency Blueprint for the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality.

For a state that has endured record-breaking rainfall from Hurricane Helene in the mountains to Tropical Storm Chantal in the Triangle, the move reflects a growing recognition: past standards no longer capture present risk.

Advertisement

Beyond outdated flood lines

Multiple North Carolina studies have found that between 43% and 60% of flood damage occurs outside FEMA’s regulatory flood zones. Those maps shape insurance requirements and local zoning decisions, yet they are largely based on historical rainfall data.

“A lot of the regulatory floodplains really haven’t kept up with what we know is happening,” said Elizabeth Losos, executive in residence at Duke University’s Nicholas Institute for Energy, Environment and Sustainability.

Climate data show rainfall intensity in the Triangle has increased by about 21% since 1970. Warmer air holds more moisture, fueling heavier downpours that overwhelm drainage systems designed for a different climate.

“Fixing what we know is flooding right now is good,” Losos said. “It’s better than nothing, but it’s definitely not enough.”

Brown said the blueprint incorporates projections for future precipitation and development — a critical factor in one of the fastest-growing states in the country.

Advertisement

“Development can be an issue for flooding in two categories,” Brown said. “One is when that development is occurring in areas that are flood prone. The other is when that development is done in ways that don’t account for the additional stormwater that will be produced.”

Thousands of projects, limited dollars

Unlike states that rely on massive levee systems, North Carolina’s flood risk is scattered across river basins, coastal plains and rapidly developing suburbs. Brown said resilience here will require thousands of localized projects.

“We were asked by the General Assembly to provide specific, actionable projects,” Brown said. “We want to know what specific geography and what specific action is proposed.”

That planning push comes as federal support for flood research and mitigation is shrinking.

The Trump administration has proposed a roughly 30% cut to NOAA’s 2026 budget, targeting climate research and ocean services that provide the rainfall and coastal data states use to model flood risk. At FEMA, the administration has cut staff by more than 6%, reduced funding for local hazard mitigation projects and added new approval layers for grants.

Advertisement

For North Carolina, that means fewer dollars for buyouts, drainage upgrades and flood control projects — and less federal data to guide long-term planning — just as the state is trying to build a more forward-looking flood strategy.

Brown said North Carolina is trying to “leverage the limited dollars that we have in the state with any federal sources that are available” and embed resilience into routine investments in transportation, water treatment and conservation.

“Funding is always going to be an issue,” Brown said.

The policy gap

Researchers have long argued that resilience investments save money. Studies show every $1 spent on mitigation can yield $4 to $13 in avoided losses.

“The problem is that the policies don’t align the people who pay the cost with the people who get the benefit,” Losos said.

Advertisement

A developer may not directly benefit from downstream flood reduction. A town may shoulder upfront infrastructure costs while insurers, neighboring communities or future taxpayers capture part of the savings.

Without policy changes that align costs and benefits, resilience can remain politically and financially difficult.

“In the most severe cases, there are some communities that will have to eventually abandon if they don’t begin to think about how they can adapt to these conditions,” Losos said.

North Carolina now has updated tools to better measure future flood risk. Whether the state can secure stable federal support — and align its own policies with the risks ahead — will determine how effectively communities prepare for the next storm rather than recover from the last one.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending