Connect with us

North Carolina

NC’s child care crunch threatens workforce, getting big business’ attention

Published

on

NC’s child care crunch threatens workforce, getting big business’ attention


An often-unseen gap in North Carolina’s infrastructure is making life more durable for working dad and mom and holding again the financial system: A baby care scarcity.

Lauren Hayworth sees it day by day on the day care facilities she oversees in Forsyth and Davie counties, the place she tries to string a needle: If she doesn’t pay workers sufficient, they’ll go away for higher-paying jobs. However pay bumps imply elevating charges. And if she raises charges, she dangers shedding shoppers who discover it makes extra sense financially to remain at dwelling with their youngsters.

Due to skinny margins, day cares do not have a lot wage flexibility. Common day care salaries in North Carolina run about $12 an hour, in keeping with state regulators. That’s lower than many quick meals eating places pay.

“We’ve got misplaced some actually great individuals with nice hearts,” stated Hayworth, chief working officer at A Baby’s World Studying Facilities. “We’ve misplaced them to do issues like empty the trash on a producing ground as a result of everybody is brief staffed.”

Advertisement

Iris McRae sees it in Richmond County, the place she’s struggling to maintain the evening shift happening her 24-hour day care. Single moms convey their toddlers to Over the Rainbow Baby Growth Heart to sleep whereas mother works the late shift.

“I’ve workers coming in saying, ‘Ms. McRae, I can go to McDonalds or Kentucky Fried Rooster,’” McRae stated throughout an interview on this weekend’s episode of WRAL’s “On the Report.” “I’ve had 15 dad and mom in two months must terminate their day care providers as a result of they could not afford to pay out of pocket.”

The excessive labor calls for in a long-overlooked discipline have stretched skinny pocket books, nerves and authorities subsidies. And, on the finish of the yr, a billion-dollar federal pandemic subsidy — which has propped issues up by boosting salaries and bonuses — will run out.

“It completely constitutes a cliff,” stated Susan Gale Perry, a chief deputy secretary on the North Carolina Division of Well being and Human Companies.

The enterprise group has seen. Addressing shortages within the baby care workforce is a high precedence for the NC Chamber throughout this state legislative session, largely as a result of the issue exacerbates workforce shortages.

With out baby care, many individuals can’t work.

Advertisement

“We all know we now have to re-imagine how we ship accessible and reasonably priced baby care,” stated Gary Salamido, chief govt of the NC Chamber, a state enterprise advocacy group.

Gov. Roy Cooper’s administration plans to ask state lawmakers for an additional $300 million over the following two fiscal years to assist suppliers pay aggressive charges because the federal subsidies run out.

What comes subsequent stays to be seen. Companies that used to request reductions for his or her workers are actually providing to pay for baby care themselves to safe slots and keep away from ready lists that always run greater than a yr, day care homeowners stated.

Some mixture of boosted state or federal subsidies, and softened regulation, might be within the offing. Some companies could deal with baby care extra like medical health insurance: A part of the price of filling jobs.

“In all probability a little bit little bit of all the pieces,” Salamido stated. “The one resolution right here goes to must be a balanced one.”

Advertisement

Lobbying is ongoing in Congress, and on the North Carolina Normal Meeting, the place key lawmakers acknowledge the issue.

“Something that we will try this facilitates the power of North Carolinians to get and preserve jobs must be and might be a precedence,” Senate Republican Chief Phil Berger stated. “Baby care is thought to be a urgent problem for a major variety of our residents. What we, as a sensible matter, can or will have the ability to do about that’s one thing that … we simply must have conversations about it.”

The Normal Meeting’s Republican majority has repeatedly minimize private revenue and enterprise taxes lately, adjustments that lawmakers credit score for the state’s run of financial success. The state’s company revenue tax price now’s 2.5% with plans to hit zero in 2030.

Requested whether or not lawmakers may sluggish enterprise tax cuts to fund baby care prices, Berger, R-Rockingham, chuckled. “I’m not in favor of any enhance in tax,” he stated.

The Chamber says that must be on the desk.

“The North Carolina Chamber simply desires aggressive tax charges,” Salamido stated. “We have by no means stated, ‘Go to zero.’ We expect we’re aggressive proper now. … So, yeah, let’s have that dialogue.”

Advertisement

The way it works

North Carolina has practically 5,500 day cares and pre-schools, serving 218,000 kids with practically 40,000 staffers.

For about 65,000 of these kids, the state helps subsidize tuition. As of final month, the ready listing for that assist had greater than 5,300 names on it.

How a lot to whittle down that ready listing is an annual dialog in Raleigh, This can be a system that day care homeowners and coverage consultants say was troubled earlier than the Covid-19 pandemic. After the pandemic hit, some lecturers left the sphere. Those who stayed typically teeter on the sting of burnout, day care homeowners advised WRAL Information.

Ready lists, not only for subsidies however for cribs and seats in school rooms, elevated as a result of day cares couldn’t preserve workers.

Advertisement

“I’ve a minimum of a minimum of 5 to 6 pages value of names,” stated Alicia Fink, of Oak Village Academy in Wake County, stated. “It’s a minimum of a yr or two for some ages.”

Fink stated that, earlier than the pandemic, she’d publish an advert to rent a trainer and get 25 to 40 résumés, largely from individuals with expertise. Now she’s quadrupled her promoting finances, retains a minimum of one advert operating continually, and will get “possibly 10 résumés if I’m fortunate,” she stated, the bulk with no expertise.

Suppliers recruit workers away from one another. Some lecturers go away to turn out to be non-public nannies.

“It’s a battle,” Fink stated. “It’s a canine battle proper now.”

Advertisement

The influence

A nationwide examine from Prepared Nation, a booster group pushing for bigger federal subsidies, pegged the financial losses from the nation’s underpowered baby care business at $122 billion a yr, up from $57 billion in a 2018 examine.

The group stated this month that $3.5 billion of that influence got here in North Carolina. It additionally stated that, of the 806 dad and mom it surveyed with kids between 0-3:
  • 23% stated they’d been fired due to baby care issues.
  • 26% stated they’d give up a job over baby care.
  • 37% stated they’d their pay or hours decreased due to baby care.
  • 41% stated they turned down a job supply because of baby care considerations.

Practically 75% reported some kind of problem accessing baby care, in keeping with the survey.

Labor is the most important value driver, and the state has strict teacher-to-child ratios that change by age and that coverage makers are loath to tinker with. Day care homeowners don’t essentially need to change them both.

They’re wanted to maintain kids protected, Hayworth stated. “There’s not numerous flexibility,” she stated.

However the business want to see training necessities revisited, and a 200-page rule guide reviewed, stated Sherry Melton, a guide for the North Carolina Licensed Baby Care Affiliation. It additionally is sensible to have a look at teacher-to-child ratios in different states and examine how typically issues happen with larger ratios, Melton stated.

Melton stated the state’s evaluation program, which grades day cares and pre-schools on a five-star scale, places an excessive amount of emphasis on how a lot training the lecturers have. Attending group faculty is pricey on a trainer’s wage, and it accounts for half the star ranking, Melton stated.

Advertisement

“It’s that fifty% of that ranking that’s killing us,” she stated.

Day care homeowners additionally need to change the best way subsidies are calculated. The state doesn’t cowl the total value of care, however about 75% of the common value of day care in a given group.

McRae stated this hurts rural suppliers, and that she buys meals and supplies from the identical place day cares do in huge cities.

“They’re not giving us any reductions,” McRae stated. “So why not let [the state] pay us as a lot cash? … The state doesn’t minimize any corners with us.”

Virginia is operating a pilot program now to pay precise prices as a substitute of a portion of the market price. Perry, the DHHS deputy secretary, stated North Carolina is taking a look at its personal various market price strategy and {that a} examine will come out with suggestions throughout the subsequent yr.

Advertisement

Improvements

Yadkinville is in a toddler care desert: A spot the place there are three or extra kids beneath 5 for each baby care spot accessible.

Native leaders see a possible reply in a program out of Minnesota. They’re elevating cash to construct a constructing that will home six small childcare suppliers. These suppliers would share, for instance, a state-required playground, rotating kids by it.

Sandi Scannelli, chief govt of the Shallow Ford Basis, is engaged on the mission and stated organizers hope to interrupt floor this spring. She sees this like a enterprise incubator and organizers are elevating cash to construct it.

Perry stated DHHS helps innovation and can monitor the group’s progress.

Advertisement

However there are considerations about whether or not sufficient dad and mom can get their kids to the identical place, and labor stays the No. 1 driver of prices.

Requested whether or not something however cash can clear up the state’s baby care shortages, Perry was practical.

“I need to be inventive and say sure,” she stated. “However I feel the underside line is that the price to provide baby care is just greater than what households alone can afford to pay. … Essentially what we now have is an ongoing, prepandemic, and solely exacerbated by the pandemic, financing drawback.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

North Carolina

North Carolina Environmental Regulators at War Over Water Rules for “Forever Chemicals” – Inside Climate News

Published

on

North Carolina Environmental Regulators at War Over Water Rules for “Forever Chemicals” – Inside Climate News


The North Carolina Chamber of Commerce has privately leaned on the state’s powerful Environmental Management Commission to delay critical PFAS rules, emails obtained under state public records law show, including providing members with the résumé of a scientist who has downplayed the toxicity of the compounds.

At the same time, a crisis involving these “forever chemicals” emerged in rural Randolph County, where drinking water at an elementary school contained the compounds far above federal limits. The school’s groundwater is contaminated, among the issues the proposed rules are meant to address.

North Carolina became one of the nation’s hotspots for the compounds in 2017, when state regulators discovered chemical company Chemours had been discharging a type called GenX into the Cape Fear River, a major drinking water supply. 

More than 300 water systems in North Carolina, serving an estimated 3.4 million people—a third of the state’s population—provide drinking water that contains levels of PFAS above federal limits, according to the state Department of Environmental Quality. These include homes, schools, child care centers and mobile home parks.

Advertisement

Most of the public utilities source their drinking water from groundwater; the rest tap into lakes and rivers.

The Haw River, the drinking water supply for Pittsboro, feeds into Jordan Lake, a drinking water source for more than 700,000 people in central North Carolina. Both water bodies have been contaminated with “forever chemicals” from industries upstream. Credit: Lisa Sorg/Inside Climate News
The Haw River, the drinking water supply for Pittsboro, feeds into Jordan Lake, a drinking water source for more than 700,000 people in central North Carolina. Both water bodies have been contaminated with “forever chemicals” from industries upstream. Credit: Lisa Sorg/Inside Climate News

The drinking water for another 200,000 people who rely on private wells is also contaminated with PFAS at concentrations above the legal limit, DEQ figures show.

Alarmed by the toxicity and pervasiveness of the compounds, DEQ now wants to regulate eight PFAS compounds in surface water and groundwater in hopes of reducing levels before they flow from household taps.

Rulemaking requires several steps, including a public comment period and approval by the EMC before going into effect. The PFAS rules, introduced by DEQ in November, are stuck in an early phase of the process as they await votes from EMC committees.

Members of the public, including managers of downstream water treatment plants, have pleaded with the EMC to make progress. Some conservative EMC members have attributed delays to DEQ. They say the commission’s water quality and groundwater committees haven’t received a full analysis of the rules’ fiscal impacts.

Election 2024Election 2024

Explore the latest news about what’s at stake for the climate during this election season.

Advertisement

DEQ has given more than a half-dozen presentations to the EMC about the proposal since last year. The agency provided the EMC with a 72-page draft of the fiscal impacts of surface water rules in May. But the final version wasn’t delivered until July and ran 214 pages.

“We want to get the regulatory impact analysis as right as we can before it goes to the full commission and the public,” EMC Chairman J.D. Solomon told Inside Climate News, “so we can get good, meaningful comments back from the public.”

On March 27, Solomon, appointed by GOP House Speaker Tim Moore, spoke to the chamber’s environmental committee. Solomon told Inside Climate News this week that he discussed the EMC’s accomplishments over the past year. The topic of PFAS did come up, Solomon said, but none of the attendees asked for a delay.

“My main message to everybody is, ‘This is coming,’” Solomon said. “‘You’re not going to get out of it. You’re not going to run and hide.’”

Three weeks later, on April 22, the chamber sent a letter to DEQ Secretary Elizabeth Biser: “It is important that we do not hastily pass regulations without fully accounting for both the positive benefits and potential negative impacts … on the state and its business community.”

Advertisement

Since then, the chamber has provided the EMC with links to talking points about the benefits of PFAS. “This chemical family is essential to mobility, communication, medical treatment, and more,” the chamber wrote on its website, which features the headline: “When it comes to North Carolina’s water, let’s let science dictate our action, not politics.”

What Are Forever Chemicals?

There are more than 15,000 types of PFAS—per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, the so-called “forever chemicals.” They are found in many consumer products, such as microwave popcorn bags, pizza boxes, stain- and water-resistant clothing and furniture, and lithium-ion batteries, including those used in electric vehicles.

They’ve been linked to many serious health conditions, including several types of cancer.

PFAS also disrupt the ocean’s ability to sequester carbon, a driver of climate change. PFAS manufacturers emit thousands of tons of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere each year. 

In 2022, the Chemours Fayetteville plant emitted 52,000 tons of greenhouse gases, according to EPA data.

Advertisement

In May, Jake Cashion, the chamber’s vice president of government affairs, sent members a résumé for scientist Michael Dourson, who has been retained by chemical companies for studies downplaying the toxicity of the compounds. 

Dourson was also former President Donald Trump’s nominee to head the Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. Dourson withdrew his name from consideration after it became clear the U.S. Senate would not confirm him. 

Cashion did not respond to a request for comment from Inside Climate News. Asked via email if the chamber had hired Dourson, and if so, in what capacity, the organization’s spokesperson did not respond.

Solomon said it’s routine for the EMC to “consider different experts” but that he has “not seen anything come to the commission” directly from Dourson.

In June, Dourson wrote an article for the Carolina Journal, a publication of the conservative John Locke Foundation, in which he wrote that North Carolinians faced “little to no risk” from PFAS in their drinking water. 

Advertisement

That contradicts findings by the EPA, federal toxicologists and independent scientists, who have linked PFAS exposure to kidney, prostate, breast, pancreatic and testicular cancer; thyroid and liver disorders; decreased fertility and low birth weight; ulcerative colitis; and a depressed immune system.

The North Carolina Manufacturers Alliance, whose members include Chemours, also opposes the draft rules, which don’t prohibit PFAS manufacturing, but only require facilities to keep the chemicals out of water supplies.

“The NCMA would like the State of North Carolina to be consistent in regulating these substances with our neighboring states and the federal rules, so as to not place North Carolina manufacturers at a competitive disadvantage in cost of manufacturing our products and expanding our operations,” the alliance wrote to DEQ and the EMC.

However, no neighboring states have enacted groundwater rules, according to DEQ. Nineteen other states have some type of groundwater guidance in place. 

The EMC in July instructed DEQ to remove five of eight compounds from its proposed groundwater standards. The remaining three, GenX, PFOA and PFOS, will be considered in September.

This story is funded by readers like you.

Our nonprofit newsroom provides award-winning climate coverage free of charge and advertising. We rely on donations from readers like you to keep going. Please donate now to support our work.

Advertisement

Donate Now

Solomon said the proposed standards for the removed compounds were more lax than existing ones, which depend on the lowest level a laboratory can detect. Those are known as practical quantitation levels, and can vary among laboratories, whose sensitivities differ. That can create regulatory uncertainty for industries.

Michael Ellison, an environmental consultant and vice-chairman of the EMC’s Water Quality Committee, has downplayed concerns about PFAS contamination—both privately and publicly.

In private, according to the emails obtained under state records law, Ellison dismissed concerns about the delays, telling a concerned resident in late June that “PFAs have been around for several decades, so any potential cost from another month or two to get the regulations right are likely to be incalculably small.”

Advertisement

At an EMC meeting on July 10, Ellison questioned their toxicity. “There is some difference of opinion about safe levels,” Ellison said, reinforcing points made by Dourson. “For decades we’ve been making and discharging this stuff. How many people have died from PFAS poisoning?” 

Contacted by Inside Climate News, Ellison did not elaborate on his comments.

Ellison worked at DEQ under Republican Gov. Pat McCrory’s administration, when the agency weakened many environmental rules. He left the agency in 2017 after Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper was elected. 

GOP Senate leader Phil Berger appointed Ellison to the EMC in 2023.

DEQ Secretary Elizabeth Biser has urged the Environmental Management Commission to hasten its rule-making on “forever chemicals” in surface water and groundwater. Credit: DEQDEQ Secretary Elizabeth Biser has urged the Environmental Management Commission to hasten its rule-making on “forever chemicals” in surface water and groundwater. Credit: DEQ
DEQ Secretary Elizabeth Biser has urged the Environmental Management Commission to hasten its rule-making on “forever chemicals” in surface water and groundwater. Credit: DEQ

The disagreement over PFAS rules escalated last month between Secretary Biser, appointed by Cooper, and conservative members of the EMC. Biser publicly criticized the group’s repeated delays, telling the media on a call: “Do they really need to count body bags before they take action?” 

Commissioner Charlie Carter, an air quality specialist and another Berger appointee, called for her resignation. “Biser’s conduct is absolutely OUTRAGEOUS … time for Biser to apologize or resign!” Carter wrote in an email to his fellow commissioners on July 14.

Advertisement

Chairman Solomon tried to rein Carter in.

“Charlie, This is over the top. No personal comments are needed on fellow Commissioners, DEQ staff, or DEQ Secretary. Stop it now,” Solomon wrote in an email to the full EMC.  “Everyone, Let’s make these emails stop. Focus on the technical and rulemaking process. We are getting this done—together.”

Biser responded to Carter’s email in a statement provided to Inside Climate News. “It’s my duty as Secretary to protect the health of North Carolina residents and these standards are critical to reducing PFAS in our surface water and groundwater and ensuring residents aren’t paying the entire cost of meeting drinking water standards,” Biser said. 

PFAS in an Elementary School’s Water

Farmer Elementary School near Asheboro, in Randolph County, serves 215 students in kindergarten through fifth grade, about half of them economically disadvantaged. The school sources its drinking water, used to quench the thirst of young children, cook school lunches and make staff coffee, from two wells drilled more than 30 years ago.

In June, DEQ tested the school’s drinking water as part of the agency’s routine assessment to help public water systems comply with EPA limits. The results were stunning. 

Advertisement

Of the 14 types of PFAS detected in Farmer Elementary’s drinking water, two of the most toxic—PFOS and PFOA—were detected at levels 144 and 233 times greater than federal limits, respectively. 

Groundwater contaminated with “forever chemicals” tainted the drinking water at Farmer Elementary School near Asheboro, in rural Randolph County. State officials are helping the school district source clean water. Credit: Lisa Sorg/Inside Climate News

That was driven by contamination in one of the school’s wells, since disconnected. It contained  PFOS at 400 times the proposed state groundwater standards.

A second well on the property also contains several types of PFAS, but only one is above federal limits.

Both the school district and the Randolph County Health Department sent letters to parents and staff about the contamination. DEQ is working with the school on ensuring a new water supply is safe, an agency spokesman said; school starts Aug. 26.

Advertisement
Farmer Elementary School relies on groundwater for drinking water, which is stored in this tower. Credit: Lisa Sorg/Inside Climate NewsFarmer Elementary School relies on groundwater for drinking water, which is stored in this tower. Credit: Lisa Sorg/Inside Climate News
Farmer Elementary School relies on groundwater for drinking water, which is stored in this tower. Credit: Lisa Sorg/Inside Climate News

DEQ is still investigating the source and the scope, according to an agency spokesperson. It’s unclear how long children and staff have been drinking contaminated water. 

A commercial site west of the school also had elevated levels of PFAS in its wells, but regulators have not pinpointed a source. Since the compounds linger in the environment for hundreds or even thousands of years, the source of the contamination could pre-date both the school and the business.

Therese Vick, research director with the Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League, told Inside Climate News that “the results were shocking and devastating.” 

The cost of providing clean water to North Carolinians whose drinking water supplies are contaminated—and determining who will pay for that treatment—lies at the heart of the fiscal analysis that the EMC committees are now considering.

The Office of State Budget and Management found the groundwater rules’ financial impact would yield net benefits of $604,000 to $3.3 million over 10 years.

An analysis of surface water standards released in July by the office shows that by the year 2060, industrial dischargers and publicly owned wastewater treatment plants would spend $9.6 billion to comply with the new rules.

Advertisement

But accounting for the savings—for water treatment plants and private well owners, health costs and property values—benefits would total $9.96 billion over the same time period. This represents a net surplus of $460,000.

Without the standards, according to DEQ, the health impacts across North Carolina through mid-century would equate to 44,925 cases of health harms. Of these cases, the agency estimated 10,279 could result in death. 

Marion Deerhake, a Cooper appointee, has been on the EMC for seven years, as the scope of contamination and dangers of PFAS in North Carolina have become clearer and more urgent.

“How many more meetings before we act?” Deerhake said at the July meeting. “It must be frustrating for people of the state who have suffered for years, having persistent toxic chemicals in their drinking water.”

About This Story

Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.

Advertisement

That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.

Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.

Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?

Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.

Thank you,

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

North Carolina

North Carolina to give Medicaid recipients free OTC birth control

Published

on

North Carolina to give Medicaid recipients free OTC birth control


North Carolina Medicaid recipients will now have access to over-the-counter (OTC) birth control pills at no cost, starting on Thursday.

In an effort to expand healthcare accessibility in the state, the oral contraceptive Opill will be available starting Thursday in over 300 local and retail pharmacies across the state without a prescription, at no cost for state Medicaid recipients, Democratic Governor Roy Cooper of North Carolina announced on Wednesday in conjunction with the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services.

“North Carolina is working to expand access to healthcare and that includes the freedom to make decisions about family planning,” Cooper said in a press release. “Making birth control easier to get is an important goal and I’m glad that NC Medicaid can take this step.”

The coverage initiative stems from a 2021 law allowing pharmacists to prescribe various contraceptives in accordance with state medical regulations.

Advertisement

According to the Associated Press, North Carolina Medicaid began enlisting pharmacists as providers in early 2024, with the state officially unveiling the Medicaid benefit two weeks ago.

Opill, the first OTC oral contraceptive approved by federal drug regulators, is expected to alleviate cost and access barriers through this initiative, particularly in rural areas where there are fewer healthcare providers, according to state Health and Human Services.

“This new coverage by NC Medicaid demonstrates our commitment to continue to remove barriers to contraception and ensure North Carolinians have access to the services they need to make the best decisions about their health and life,” State Health Director and Chief Medical Officer Dr. Elizabeth Cuervo Tilson said.

Newsweek has reached out to Cooper’s office and the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services via email for comment.

In addition, under this initiative, Medicaid-enrolled pharmacies will be able to submit reimbursement claims for birth control pills.

Advertisement

This comes as the state’s Medicaid program serves nearly 3 million residents, with women comprising 56 percent of the enrollees, the AP reported.

“Our goal is to ensure everyone has access to the right contraception and reproductive services at the right time in their community,” NC Health and Human Services Secretary Kody H. Kinsley said in a press release. “This new coverage is part of our ongoing work to invest in child and family well-being by increasing access to health care and ultimately improving maternal and infant outcomes.”

In addition, earlier this month over 500,000 North Carolinians enrolled in the state’s Medicaid expansion program since the program began seven months ago, according to Copper’s office.

According to Cooper’s office, since December 1, 2023, new Medicaid enrollees have filled more than 1.9 million new prescriptions for conditions like heart health, diabetes, seizures and other illnesses.

Meanwhile, the state’s OTC birth control initiative comes after the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade in 2022 escalated concerns over the security of other reproductive rights, including access to contraception.

Advertisement

Last month, the Right to Contraception Act, introduced in 2022 and aimed to enshrine into federal law the right to obtain and use contraceptives, was blocked by Senate Republicans in a 51-39 vote, arguing it was unnecessary and overly broad.

The bill needed 60 votes to defeat a filibuster and move forward in the chambers.

If later approved, the Right to Contraception Act would ensure individuals could access various forms of birth control, such as pills, patches, impacts, condoms, IUDs and sterilization procedures.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York warned last month of Republican efforts in some states to block access to contraception, saying it was “all the more reason to move to protect contraception at the federal level.”

“To those who think that federal action protecting access to birth control is unnecessary, just look at what’s happening in states like Virginia and Nevada and Arizona, where Republicans are openly blocking these very protections. I would hope that protecting access to birth control would be the definition of an easy, uncontroversial decision here in the Senate. But the vote will tell all,” Schumer said.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, on the Senate floor last month, Republican Senator Katie Britt of Alabama condemned the Democrats’ legislation efforts as a “summer of scare tactics.”

“This is continuing the campaign of fear-mongering we’ve already seen. Contraception is available in every state across the nation. The goal of my Democratic colleagues right now is to scare the American people, to scare women across our great nation. It’s not that they believe that there’s a problem they’re truly trying to solve. They’re prioritizing their own short-term partisan political interest,” Britt said.

In this photo illustration, a package of Opill is displayed on March 22, 2024, in San Anselmo, California. North Carolina Medicaid recipients will now have access to over-the-counter (OTC) birth control pills at no cost,…


Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Uncommon Knowledge

Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding connections in the search for common ground.

Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding connections in the search for common ground.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

North Carolina's GOP-controlled House overrides Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper's vetoes

Published

on

North Carolina's GOP-controlled House overrides Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper's vetoes


RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — North Carolina’s Republican-led House quickly overrode three of Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper’s vetoes on Wednesday.

The House votes, largely along party lines, sent the overrides to the Senate, which does not meet this week. Veto overrides require supermajorities from both legislative chambers to become law. Since gaining supermajorities last year, GOP lawmakers have blocked all of Cooper’s vetoes.

The first bill allows the North Carolina Division of Motor Vehicles to issue title certificates for all-terrain and utility vehicles, and expands the types of roads accessible for modified utility vehicles to include all roads with speed limits of 55 mph or less. Cooper said in his veto statement that the law would endanger people on state highways because off-road vehicles don’t have as many safety features.

The second piece of legislation changes several laws involving tenancy, notaries and small claims court. What mostly prompted Cooper’s veto was a prohibition against local ordinances that aim to stop landlords from denying tenancy to people whose rent money comes mostly from federal housing assistance programs.

Advertisement

The last bill, among other things, blocks state agencies from taking payments in central bank digital currency, which is similar to cryptocurrencies, but with value determined by a country’s central bank. In the U.S., the Federal Reserve would be liable for the currency’s value, and the agency is still studying whether it can manage its risks to the cost and availability of credit, the safety and stability of the financial system, and the efficacy of monetary policy.

Cooper called the legislation “premature, vague and reactionary,” and urged the Legislature to wait to see how it works before passing laws to restrict it.

There are two more vetoes that still require action from both chambers. Lawmakers are scheduled to reconvene in early September.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending