Connect with us

North Carolina

If Raleigh Budgeted More Like N.C., Taxpayers Would Save Millions

Published

on

If Raleigh Budgeted More Like N.C., Taxpayers Would Save Millions


Unsustainable rates of growth in government spending is a problem at the federal and state levels. Lawmakers in most states, both blue and red, are growing government spending at an unsustainable rate, more rapidly than population growth and inflation. Yet a number of states have demonstrated over the past decade that fiscal restraint and conservative budgeting is an achievable goal.

In the decade from 2014 to 2023, total state outlays (both state funds and federal transfer funds) in six states (Alaska, Colorado, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Texas, Wyoming) grew at a slower pace than the rate of population growth plus inflation, also referred to as the fiscally sustainable growth rate (SGR). In another six states (Louisiana, Massachusetts, Montana, North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island), state spending (state funds only, not including federal transfers) grew at a slower pace than the SGR. Yet even in states where lawmakers have practiced sustainable budgeting, runaway spending by local governments remains a challenge.

Advertisement

North Carolina is one of the states where lawmakers kept growth of state spending over the past decade below the rate of population growth plus inflation. While state legislators in Raleigh, led by Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Berger (R) and Speaker Tim Moore (R), are practicing budgetary restraint, local officials in Raleigh are not.

Take the new FY 2025 city budget recently proposed by the Raleigh City Council, which totals $1.44 billion. That represents a nearly 12% increase from the current budget.

If the Raleigh City Council were to craft a new spending plan that instead grew city spending in line with the rate of inflation and population growth, which is 6.56%, they would need to enact a budget that spends $1.36 billion next year, not the proposed $1.43 billion. A new city budget that grew in line with population growth plus inflation, which the General Assembly down the street has demonstrated is attainable for more than a decade, would save Raleigh taxpayers more than $66 million next year.

Basic math demonstrates that Raleigh officials could provide signifiant relief to taxpayers through more sustainable budgeting. As Senator Berger, Speaker Moore, and their colleagues have demonstrated for years, meaningful taxpayer savings doesn’t not necessitate drastic spending cuts or a slashing of services, but more modest rates of growth.

Advertisement

By keeping growth in state spending below the rate of population growth plus inflation, North Carolina has realized repeated budget surpluses at the same time lawmakers have returned billions to taxpayers through rate-reducing income tax reform that has brought the state’s top income tax rate from 7.75% down to 4.5% in the matter of a decade. Thanks to this fiscal restraint on the part of the North Carolina General Assembly, state government is much trimmer in size than was the case a decade ago.

“For several decades – from the mid-1970’s up until the Republican takeover of the General Assembly in 2011 – North Carolina’s state budget hovered between 6% and 7% of the state’s economy,” the NC Budget Center, a progressive outfit, reported in 2021. “Thanks to big tax and spending cuts enacted by the General Assembly, state outlays began to plummet, reaching their nadir during the current fiscal year at around 4.54% of the state’s economy.”

The NC Budget Center and other progressive organizations bemoan the fact that, relative to the size of the North Carolina economy, state government is now much leaner than it was prior to the 2010 GOP takeover of the state legislature. Yet, proving the adage that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, many others, including most North Carolina legislators, view that same trend as one to brag about, particularly on the campaign trail.



Source link

Advertisement

North Carolina

North Carolina Supreme Court Lets Stand Greg Lindberg’s Civil Fraud Liability

Published

on

North Carolina Supreme Court Lets Stand Greg Lindberg’s Civil Fraud Liability


The North Carolina Supreme Court has decided that it will not, after all, review another legal filing by convicted insurance entrepreneur Greg Lindberg.

The Oct. 17 ruling lets stand a 2023 decision by the state Court of Appeals, which found that Lindberg and some of his affiliated companies were liable for fraud by misleading life insurance companies and a reinsurance firm that he once owned.

“We hold the trial court’s conclusions of law were supported by findings of fact based on competent evidence,” the appeals court judges wrote in the 2023 opinon.

The high court in December 2023 had agreed to review the appeal court’s order, at Lindberg’s behest. But after hearing oral arguments, the Supreme Court justices changed their minds, noting that “discretionary review was improvidently allowed by order on 13 December 2023.”

Advertisement

No further explanation was offered. But with multiple criminal and civil proceedings stemming from the bribery conviction of and the regulatory crackdown on Lindberg, the appeal court’s 24-page opinion offers a valuable recount of some of the main aspects of the voluminous litigation involving Lindberg since 2016.

“Simply put, Lindberg created a scheme in which he caused $1.2 billon held for Plaintiffs’ policyholders to be invested into other non-insurance companies that he also owned or controlled,” the appellate judges wrote in the opinion in Southland National Insurance Corp., et al, vs. Greg Lindberg, et al.

Lindberg

It all began in 2014 under previous North Carolina Insurance Commissioner Wayne Goodwin, the court explained. Lindberg sought to re-domesticate Southland, Bankers Life Insurance Co., Colorado Bankers Life Insurance Co., and Southland National Reinsurance Corp. to North Carolina. Lindberg struck a special agreement with Goodwin, allowing Lindberg to break what has often been considered a cardinal rule for insurance companies – keeping adequate reserves on hand and under the control of the insurance carrier.

Instead, Lindberg was allowed to invest up to 40% of the insurance companies’ assets into affiliated business entities, and Lindberg soon invested hundreds of millions into non-insurance firms he owned or controlled.

In 2016, Mike Causey defeated Goodwin in the election and took over as insurance commissioner. Causey moved swiftly to reduce the cap on affiliated investments – back to 10%, the court explained.

Advertisement

Lindberg in early 2018 attempted to bribe Causey with heavy campaign contributions, hoping for a relaxation of the rules as he struggled to “untangle his affiliated investments,” the appellate judges noted. Causey cooperated with federal authorities and wore a recording device during the meeting with Lindberg. Lindberg was convicted of bribery in 2020, had his conviction overturned due to improper jury instructions, then was convicted again in 2024. He’s still awaiting sentencing.

Meanwhile, in late 2018, while Lindberg’s prosecution was pending, it became obvious that Lindberg’s affiliated companies would not meet their obligations to restore funds to cover the life insurers’ policyholder liabilities. NCDOI placed Southland and the other insurance companies under administrative supervision. An out-of-state consultant was put in charge, and deadlines were set for repayment of the assets.

With it becoming clear that Lindberg’s affiliated firms would not meet the deadlines, Southland and the other insurance companies signed a memorandum of understanding and other agreements, restucturing the financial obligations, providing a $40 million line of credit to a company owned by Lindberg, and making the affiliated firms subsidiaries of a newly created holding company, the court explained.

In 2019, Lindberg’s affiliated firms failed to meet the restructuring agreements’ goals and failed to make the affiliated businesses part of the holding company. Southland filed suit, charging fraud.

The trial court in Wake County largely agreed, and the appeals court upheld the lower court’s ruling.

Advertisement

“Defendants attempt to convince this Court that the MOU’s main purpose was not only to rehabilitate Plaintiffs’ companies, but to ensure Lindberg would continue to benefit from the overall transaction,” the appellate judges wrote. “This argument ignores another of Defendants’ motivations: to make money using capital provided by hardworking, North Carolina policyholders.”

Lindberg’s team claimed that the memorandum of understanding was unenforceable. The appeals court didn’t buy that argument.

“Defendants and Lindberg have enjoyed the benefit of millions of dollars of debt relief provided by Plaintiffs, yet continue to claim the MOU is unenforceable,” the court wrote.

On other arguments the court was equally critical of Lindberg’s assertions.

“Put plainly, Defendants made representations about their ability to perform under the MOU, then just two weeks before performance was due, cited those exact representations as the reason why they could not perform,” Judge April Wood wrote in the opinion.

Advertisement

And because Lindberg understood the intricacies of the affiliated businesses’ structures, he knew that performance under the MOU was impossible, “yet made representations that induced Plaintiffs to enter into the contract. For those reasons, we hold the trial court did not err in finding Defendants’ actions satisfied the elements of fraud.”

The appeals court remanded part of the case to the lower court to determine remedies available to Southland and the other plaintiff insurance companies.

In November 2024, Lindberg pleaded guilty to $2 billion in fraud in a related prosecution. In July of this year, a federal judge approved a plan to distribute $318 million from the sale of a Lindberg-owned software firm to the life insurance policyholders. In early October, the judge allowed the release of policyholder information so that a special master in the case could finally begin distributing funds to the victims of the fraud.

Read more about Lindberg’s bribery conviction here, and other court rulings here.

Topics
Fraud
North Carolina
Liability

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

State senator accused of drunk driving in North Carolina capital city

Published

on

State senator accused of drunk driving in North Carolina capital city


RALEIGH, N.C. (WBTV) – A North Carolina state senator was arrested and charged with DWI and other crimes in Raleigh over the weekend, court records revealed.

Wake County records showed 74-year-old Sen. Norman Sanderson was arrested on Saturday, Oct. 18, in the area of Edwards Mill and Trinity roads, which is about half a mile from NC State’s Carter-Finley Stadium.

Records showed Sanderson blew a 0.16 BAC on a breathalyzer test, which is exactly twice the legal limit to drive.

Upon his arrest, Sanderson was charged with DWI, having an open container after drinking and failure to obey a traffic officer.

Advertisement

He was released from the Wake County jail late Saturday night after he posted a $2,000 bond.

Sanderson is currently in his seventh term in the North Carolina Senate, and previously served one term in the state House.

A Republican, Sanderson represents Carteret, Chowan, Halifax, Hyde, Martin, Pamlico, Warren and Washington counties — all of which are in the northeastern corner of the state.

State Sen. Norman Sanderson was arrested in Raleigh, N.C. on Saturday, Oct. 18.(NC General Assembly/Wake County Bureau of Forensic Services)

Also Read: State representative charged with child sex crimes in North Carolina

Watch continuous news coverage here:

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

North Carolina

Rain and wind Sunday in North Carolina| Secure objects outdoors and Halloween decorations tonight

Published

on

Rain and wind Sunday in North Carolina| Secure objects outdoors and Halloween decorations tonight


Ready for a windy Sunday? Gusts will increase early morning through late afternoon and evening. Saturday night is a good time to secure patio items and Halloween decorations from the Piedmont Triad to the Mountains. Rain and severe storms are possible too.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending