Connect with us

Louisiana

Louisiana voters to decide on freedom of worship constitutional amendment

Published

on

Louisiana voters to decide on freedom of worship constitutional amendment


In October, Louisiana voters will decide on a constitutional amendment that would provide in the state constitution that “the freedom to worship in a church or other place of worship is a fundamental right that is worthy of the highest order of protection.”

Under the amendment, a legal challenge brought against a state or a local government action for conflicting with this right would be required to be examined by a court with strict scrutiny. This means that a government entity could only pass a law or take an action that conflicts with the right to worship if it can show that the law or action is necessary to achieve a compelling governmental interest and is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest.

The Louisiana Constitution currently includes the right to freedom of religion in Section 8 of Article I. The amendment would provide that the existing constitutional right to religious freedom, granted by Section 8 of Article I of the Louisiana Constitution, “shall not be limited to the fundamental right to worship in a church or other place of worship.”

Advertisement

This amendment was introduced as Senate Bill 63. It was passed unanimously in the Senate on May 2. The House passed the bill on May 30, by a vote of 86-13 with six members absent. In the House, all 69 Republican representatives and one independent representative voted in favor; while 16 Democratic representatives voted in favor and 13 voted against the amendment.






Advertisement

Rep. Beth Mizell proposed a tax credit for donations to pregnancy centers around the state. (Photo credit: Francis Dinh/LSU Manship School News Service)


Legislative sponsor Sen. Beth Mizell, R-Franklinton, said, “In the latest action that we went through with the pandemic, churches were the last gathering place that were allowed to open. This bill attempts to affirm a right that was put in place at our founding which is the freedom of worship.”

Pastor John Raymond of New Horizon Church in Slidell, Louisiana, said, “The freedom to peacefully assemble and the freedom of religious expression were casualties of war during COVID-19. While some may consider our freedom of religious expression and our right to worship with our spiritual family an optional privilege, I urge you to recognize that it is an absolute right and must never again be compromised in times of crisis.”

Democrat Gov. John Bel Edwards issued a stay-at-home order for Louisiana in March 2020 that limited public or private gatherings of more than 50 people, and later decreased the limit to 10 people. Reverend Tony Spell was charged with six misdemeanor citations for violating the stay-at-home orders in April 2020 after holding religious gatherings at his church, Life Tabernacle Church, in Baton Rouge.

Advertisement

Spell challenged his citations and alleged that his first amendment rights were violated by the stay-at-home order. On May 13, 2022, the Louisiana Supreme Court dropped the charges against Rev. Spell, in a 5-2 ruling, in which the court held that the executive orders violated Spell’s right to exercise religion and do not survive the test of strict scrutiny, and were therefore unconstitutional.

Justice William J. Crane wrote in the majority opinion, “A public health emergency does not relegate the First Amendment to a proposition or allow violations thereof to be judged on a sliding scale of constitutionality. The infringement of the fundamental right of the free exercise of religion, whether in times of crisis or calm, must always be strictly scrutinized by our courts.”

The New Orleans Secular Humanist Association wrote a letter opposing the amendment, stating, “What the ‘highest order of protection’ entails is unclear, but one might assume that the First Amendment in the U.S. Constitution is about as high as an order of legal protection could get. The only issue that this might be relevant to is that of government restrictions on public gatherings for health (such as pandemics) or other public safety concerns — but I’m sure Mizell would not risk the wellbeing of her fellow citizens for the sake of going to church for a few days.

“I am also sure Mizell is sincere about her dedication and devotion to this ideal and to her faith, but at the same time knows suggesting this vague, redundant wording to our constitution will be well-received by, and strengthen the loyalty of, her constituents as lagniappe.”

Related ballot measures arising in response to the coronavirus pandemic include Texas Proposition 3 of 2021, which amended the state constitution to prohibit the state or any political subdivision from enacting a law, rule, order, or proclamation that limits religious services or organizations. The amendment was approved with 62.42% of voters in favor and 37.85% of voters opposed.

Advertisement

Additionally, in 2022, Arkansas voters rejected Issue 3, which would have amended the state constitution to provide that “government shall not burden a person’s freedom of religion even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability.”

A total of 56 constitutional amendments appeared on the statewide ballot in Louisiana during odd-numbered years from 1999 through 2021. Of the 56 amendments, 37 (67.27%) were approved and 19 (34.54%) were defeated.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Louisiana

Ankle monitoring company to face negligent homicide trial in Louisiana woman’s 2021 murder

Published

on

Ankle monitoring company to face negligent homicide trial in Louisiana woman’s 2021 murder


NEW ORLEANS (WVUE) – The Louisiana Supreme Court has ruled that a Mississippi-based electronic monitoring company can be tried for negligent homicide in the case of Peggy Beasley, a mother of three murdered by her estranged husband Marshall Rayburn.

The monitoring company AEM allegedly failed to report multiple breaches of a court-ordered security perimeter around Beasley’s home, which prosecutors say allowed Rayburn the opportunity to kill her.

“Had I thought he would do it, I would have never let my mom stay at her home by herself,” Beasley’s daughter, Devlin Hopper, said.

In August 2021, Beasley reported to St. Francisville authorities that Rayburn, from whom she was separated, had been drugging and raping her.

Advertisement

Rayburn was arrested for second-degree rape, released on a $100,000 bond, and outfitted with an ankle monitor. He was instructed to stay away from Beasley’s home, with an exclusion zone programmed into the monitor.

Marshall Rayburn’s mugshot, taken after his arrest in August 2021.(Provided by West Feliciana Parish Sheriff’s Office)

Despite this, Rayburn breached the exclusion zone five times within four days, triggering notifications to AEM. However, the company failed to alert authorities.

Over the following weeks, Rayburn repeatedly violated the zone.

On Sept. 20, 2021, Rayburn entered Beasley’s home, hid in the laundry room with a gun and attacked her.

A neighbor heard the screams and tried to help.

Advertisement

“Marshall put the gun to the neighbor’s chest and fired through her chest, through her back, and hit (Beasley) and killed her,” District Attorney Sam D’Aquilla recounted.

Rayburn then turned the gun on himself. Crime scene photos revealed Rayburn had wrapped his ankle monitor in aluminum foil to block the signal, a violation that also went unreported by AEM.

“He blatantly broke the rules. He tested them,” said Beasley’s son, Jared Crow. “The GPS data shows that.”

D’Aquilla charged AEM’s owner and an employee with negligent homicide for not reporting the violations.

RELATED STORIES

Advertisement

Orleans DA blasts juvenile officials’ monitoring of teen accused of tour guide’s murder

Accused 15-year-old killer of French Quarter tour guide was wearing deactivated ankle monitor, sources say

Accused killer of Tacoma visitor in January was under Orleans Juvenile Court monitoring order

Beasley’s murder prompted new legislation requiring monitoring companies to report breaches or face penalties, including imprisonment and fines.

“It’s a slap in the face to the victims and the public,” D’Aquilla said. “These are dangerous individuals being monitored with no oversight.”

Advertisement
The Louisiana Supreme Court has ruled that a Mississippi-based electronic monitoring company...
The Louisiana Supreme Court has ruled that a Mississippi-based electronic monitoring company can be tried for negligent homicide in the case of Peggy Beasley(Action News 5)

The law, effective January 1, will make Louisiana the first state to hold monitoring companies criminally accountable for failing to report violations.

“If you screw this stuff up, you can go to jail,” said Matt Dennis of ASAP Release, who is helping revamp state electronic monitor protocols.

Although the new law came too late for Peggy Beasley, her family hopes it will prevent future tragedies.

“That’s one of the hardest things for my brothers and daughters, knowing her life could have been saved so many times. It didn’t have to be this,” Hopper said. “We miss her. She was one of a kind. She truly was.”

The case against AEM will move forward after the Supreme Court upheld the indictment, which was initially appealed by the company.

“The system failed. We’re doing everything we can to hold somebody accountable for the death of their mother,” D’Aquilla stated.

Advertisement

Fox 8 reached out to AEM for comment but received no response.

See a spelling or grammar error in our story? Click Here to report it. Please include the headline.

Subscribe to the Fox 8 YouTube channel.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Louisiana

Federal investigators will look into Bayou Lafourche crude oil spill • Louisiana Illuminator

Published

on

Federal investigators will look into Bayou Lafourche crude oil spill • Louisiana Illuminator


A federal agency is sending investigators to south Louisiana to look into the cause of a crude oil spill that has tainted a portion of Bayou Lafourche, a spokesman for the company where the accident took place said Monday.

As the third day of cleanup following the Saturday morning spill progressed, officials overseeing the cleanup calculated that 34,440 gallons of crude were released from a storage tank near Raceland. The oil originated from the Crescent Midstream Crude Oil Facility, spilling through a protective dike into a stormwater canal and eventually through a culvert under Highway 308 that flows into the bayou.

Michael Smith, public information officer for Crescent Midstream and the Unified Command overseeing the spill response, said the 34,440 gallons of oil — or 820 barrels — includes the amount spilled on the grounds of the facility. The accident does not involve the large cylindrical storage tank on the property, which Smith said was empty before Saturday.

Officials from the federal Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration will be on site within the next few days, Smith said, confirming Crescent Midstream representatives had spoken with the agency Monday. They will begin an official investigation, taking over the informal work of the Unified Command, which is composed of state and local officials along with Crescent Midstream.  

Advertisement

Meanwhile, work continues to capture the crude from the bayou. An advisory to conserve water remains in place for residents and business along Bayou Lafourche from south of the Louisiana Highway 182 bridge to Port Fourchon, a stretch that covers 55 miles. However, drinking water remains safe to consume, Lafourche Parish President Archie Chaisson said.  

Our news partners at WVUE-TV Fox 8 report that Lafourche Parish Water District No. 1 has issued a water conservation notice for all customers in the parish.

Chaisson reported Thursday evening that a fish kill was spot in the incident area. No immediate information was provided on the type or number of fish affected.

An update on the wildlife impact increased the death toll to 17 salamanders, in addition to the previously reported three turtles and one crawfish. Cleanup crews were able to capture one of three oil-covered ducks on the bayou. It was taken to a rehabilitation center for cleaning and care.

A black sheen trailing down the bayou remained visible Monday from aerial photographs. Crews were washing oil from the banks of the bayou and collecting it with skimmers, boom and vacuum trucks for disposal. More than a mile of boom — 6,800 feet — has been deployed on the bayou so far, according to Monday afternoon’s update from the Unified Command. 

Advertisement

Smith stressed that oil dispersants, which are not approved for inland water use, are not among the methods being used to contain the oil. 

Use of oil dispersants has been under added scrutiny since the deadly BP Deepwater Horizon explosion in 2010 just off the coast of Louisiana. The chemical Corexit has been blamed for sickening cleanup workers who responded to the manmade disaster. Medical issues ranging from skin rashes to cancer have been detailed in thousands of lawsuits.  

Cleanup crews are pumping water from the bayou to remove oil from the bayouside, Smith said. As a result, it’s causing some oil to flow upstream, which could find its way back to shore if it can’t be collected from the water with booms or skimmers. 

“It could get worse before it gets better,” Smith said in an interview. “You could see oil cleaned up in front of your house one day, only to see it back again the next day.”

The bayou remains closed to boaters from the Highway 182 bridge in Raceland to the Lockport Bridge, with the Lafourche Parish Sheriff’s Office handling enforcement. 

Advertisement

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Louisiana

Some Louisiana justices will take the money and run

Published

on

Some Louisiana justices will take the money and run


Louisiana lawmakers this year decided to give judges a one-time pay bump, similar to what they gave public school teachers, but with one significant distinction: Teachers will get a $2,000 stipend; judges will get from roughly $15,000 to almost $17,700 each.

Lemme say right up front that I believe the vast majority of Louisiana’s judges, like the vast majority of teachers, deserve better pay.

Ah, there’s the rub.



Advertisement



Clancy DuBos

Advertisement




The recent stipend that legislators gave to judges was intended to be paid out over the course of the current fiscal year, as the money is earned — similar to how teachers have received their non-recurring stipends in recent years.

But six of the seven Louisiana Supreme Court justices decided to take their stipends in one lump sum — in advance — this week. Worse, the six justices (all except Chief Justice John Weimer) decreed that all other judges must do likewise or forfeit the stipend altogether. And most galling of all, two of the justices will leave the court in the coming months, and thus pocket a full year’s stipend for no more than a half year’s work. 

The decision to jam the lower court judges came in response to a request from several of them to do the right thing and take the stipend incrementally, after it is earned, which is what common sense and the Louisiana Constitution require.

In effect, the six justices are forcing lower court judges to join their money grab in order to give themselves cover, the law be damned.

Advertisement

Public opinion of the judiciary is already low. The six Supremes’ decision to take the money and run will only make things worse.

One-time “bonuses” to Louisiana public employees are outlawed by our state constitution — unless the payments are made after future services are rendered. They cannot be extra compensation for past services already rendered and paid for. 

That’s not my opinion. It’s from a 2010 Louisiana Attorney General’s opinion, citing a landmark Louisiana Supreme Court decision known as the Cabela’s case. It’s why teachers get their stipends periodically, typically after each semester.

It’s also what lawmakers intended when they voted to give the judges a pay bump.

“The legislative intent was to spread it out over the year, but I guess we should have been more specific in the language,” state Rep. Jack McFarland, R-Winnfield, told The Times-Picayune | The Advocate. McFarland chairs the House Appropriations Committee and authored the bill that included the stipend.

Advertisement

Lawmakers also added a condition for judges receiving the stipend: participation in a “workpoint study” designed track the workloads and output of judicial districts and potentially individual judges. The study would help lawmakers decide which courts need to be expanded and which should be reduced in size.

Which explains why some judges don’t want to see such a study happen.

State Rep. Jerome “Zee” Zeringue, R-Houma, has pushed for a workpoint study for years, to no avail. Zeringue, who previously chaired the appropriations panel for four years, confirmed McFarland’s comment on legislators’ intent regarding the stipend being paid out periodically.

The justices are not the only ones flouting the clear legislative intent, however. Gov. Jeff Landry line-item vetoed the workpoint study requirement — but left the stipend intact.

That means taxpayers will foot the roughly $6 million cost of the judicial stipend, but we’ll never know which judges actually earn the extra dough. We can, however, identify some who definitely won’t earn it.

Advertisement

Associate Supreme Court Justice James Genovese will pocket $15,280 up front but leave the court by mid-September, when he will become Landry’s hand-picked president of Northwestern State University in Natchitoches. By leaving early, Genovese will technically earn less than 20% of the stipend. He’ll also will get a handsome pay raise at Northwestern, plus housing and other perks, on top of his enhanced judicial retirement.

Associate Justice Scott Crichton likewise will take the same $15,280 in advance but not serve past Dec. 31, when his current term expires. Crichton has already reached the mandatory retirement age of 70. He’ll earn only half of his stipend.

Several other judges likewise are set to receive the full stipend but only work half a year.

It’s a shame that the avarice of a few jurists will reflect badly on all judges, most of whom work hard to uphold the notion of an independent judiciary. They deserve better.

The Legislature, through the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, should correct this abuse by ensuring that judges who rightly decline to take the up-front money still get it periodically, as the law requires, after they’ve earned it.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending