Connect with us

Delaware

Lawmakers considered defanging controversial Delaware hospital cost review board

Published

on

Lawmakers considered defanging controversial Delaware hospital cost review board


play

Advertisement
  • Delaware lawmakers considered removing the Diamond State Hospital Cost Review Board’s power to veto hospital budgets.
  • The proposal was ultimately rejected, and the board’s previously frozen funding is expected to be reinstated.
  • This decision follows ongoing debate and lobbying surrounding the board’s authority to control healthcare costs.

This story was produced by Spotlight Delaware as part of a partnership with Delaware Online/The News Journal. For more about Spotlight Delaware, visit www.spotlightdelaware.org.

In the weeks since Delaware’s powerful legislative budget committee froze funding to a health care cost-cutting board, lawmakers circulated a proposal to strip the board of its chief enforcement tool, according to a copy of the proposal obtained by Spotlight Delaware. 

The proposal to remove the board’s ability to veto hospital budgets struck at the heart of its central mission of forcing financial austerity onto the state’s health care systems – including Delaware’s largest and most politically influential one, ChristianaCare. 

It also came after a Delaware judge ruled late last month that ChristianaCare’s legal challenge to the board’s authority over its budgets could continue. 

In the end, lawmakers on the budget-setting Joint Finance Committee decided not to move forward with the proposal. 

Advertisement

Instead, on Tuesday, June 17, they are expected to simply reinstate the frozen funds to the health care board, called the Diamond State Hospital Cost Review Board.  

Senate Democratic Caucus Chief of Staff Jesse Chadderdon told Spotlight Delaware that lawmakers had discussed the proposal to strip the board of its authority over hospital budgets, but failed to gain a consensus on the matter among the members who sit on the Joint Finance Committee.

The measure to reinstate $1 million that had been frozen from the board two weeks ago was a more palatable proposal, Chadderdon said.

Still, cuts to another $1.5 million in reserve funds, which had been in place for the board’s litigation and other costs, will remain. 

Advertisement

The fact that legislators, especially those in the State Senate, even considered such a proposal is notable, as statehouse Democrats have defended the merits and need of the board over the objections of Republicans and hospital leaders for more than a year.

It is not immediately clear why lawmakers on the Joint Finance Committee want to undo the funding freeze that they approved just two weeks ago. Chadderdon asserted that the original freeze was unconstitutional. 

When asked about Tuesday’s meeting and about the proposal that had been considered, Rep. Kim Williams (D-Stanton), who chairs the Joint Finance Committee, said simply that the committee is meeting to discuss language in the state’s budget that pertains to the hospital cost review board.

What would the proposal have done?

According to the draft copy of the legislation, which was to be inserted as epilogue language to the annual state operating budget, lawmakers had considered stripping the board of the ability to punish hospital systems that are not compliant with its efforts to rein in costs, including making changes to their budget.

Advertisement

It would leave a board that was largely tasked with obtaining currently private revenue and expenditure information that would better inform the public of the operation of its hospital systems and writing performance improvement plans for those found to be exceeding cost-containment goals set by the state.

If a hospital system failed to execute an improvement plan though, the board would only be able to extend or amend such a plan, but have no way of enforcing it.

It would also push back implementation of the law to next year.

Fight has drawn on

In all, the developments mark the latest chapter in more than a year of lobbying surrounding the board tasked with bringing down hospital costs in Delaware, which are among the highest in the country. 

It began last spring when hospital board members and administrators flooded Dover wearing white coats in efforts to oppose the bill that created the Diamond State Hospital Cost Review Board.

Advertisement

It continued late last year when two opposing local lobbying forces – the Delaware Hospital Association and a coalition of public sector unions – each pressured then-Gov. John Carney over whether to nominate members to the newly created state board. 

Carney, who at the time was in his final months as governor, was seen as more supportive of the hospital cost review board than his successor Gov. Matt Meyer. 

Delaware Hospital Association President Brian Frazee told Spotlight Delaware then that Meyer had shown a willingness to make changes to the law that created the board. 

Frazee also said then that his group’s primary complaint was with the review board’s legal authority to modify hospital budgets that its members deem excessive. His comments followed assertions from ChristianaCare that the board threatens the hospital’s ability “to care for the community.” 

But, public sector unions countering Frazee’s lobbying pointed to high health costs in Delaware, and argued in a letter to the governor last year that large portions of the state government’s budget “are being devoured by unchecked health care costs that continue to rise faster than the rate of inflation.”

Advertisement

Ultimately, Carney did appoint five members of the board in the waning days of his term and Meyer has added two more. They have met a handful of times but have not advanced the mission of the board in significant ways to date.

Lobbying has since sustained through this year’s legislative session, including last month when Delaware Healthcare Association and other nonprofits sent a joint letter to lawmakers urging them to postpone the implementation of the cost review board for one year.  

In response, the coalition of state worker unions again sent a competing letter, calling on the legislature to “reject the Delaware Healthcare Association’s latest request to delay the Board’s work.”

What followed was the Joint Finance Committee decision to freeze funding to the hospital cost review board. 

Williams, the committee chair, told Spotlight Delaware then that her decision to pause the funding wasn’t influenced by lobbying. 

Advertisement

Instead, she said the state should not continue to pay to implement a board “whose future is so uncertain.”

Get stories like this delivered to your email inbox by signing up for the free newsletter at spotlightdelaware.org/subscribe.



Source link

Delaware

Federal judge says Delaware labor officials must give data to ICE

Published

on

Federal judge says Delaware labor officials must give data to ICE


play

A federal judge in Wilmington has ordered the Delaware Department of Labor to hand over confidential state employer data to Immigration and Customs Enforcement investigators.

On April 13, U.S. District Judge Colm Connolly ordered Delaware labor officials to comply with a federal immigration subpoena they had “ignored,” writing that the state lacked legal grounds to resist it and that its political arguments were “wholly inappropriate.”

Advertisement

The subpoena seeks wage reports and employee rosters containing confidential employee information for 15 businesses and sought by ICE investigators as part of President Donald Trump’s mass deportation agenda.

Attorneys representing the state’s Department of Labor justified their noncompliance by arguing that local and federal regulators give state officials the authority to refuse federal investigators’ requests. They warned that allowing ICE to access employer data would discourage reporting and weaken the unemployment insurance program.

Local federal attorneys representing ICE argued the department is legally required to hand over the data targeting businesses that tip-line reports put under suspicion of employing undocumented individuals. In court filings, they said the state’s refusal to comply amounts to a legally unsound disagreement with federal immigration policy.

The arguments: Federal judge questions Delaware’s attempt to sidestep ICE subpoena

The contested subpoena was the last in a series that went unanswered by state labor officials during the first quarter of 2025. The subpoenas themselves are not legally confidential. However, Connolly, the presiding judge, sealed the final subpoena – the one at issue in the case – after federal officials sued the state to force compliance.

Advertisement

The state has produced redacted copies of some of the initial subpoenas to Delaware Online/The News Journal via a Freedom of Information Act request. Those early subpoenas targeted a Perdue facility in Seaford as well as a fencing company and a Mexican restaurant in northern New Castle County.  

The final subpoena seeks data on the employees of 15 state businesses for the final two quarters of 2024 and is the subject of the current court wrangling. Connolly also denied the state’s argument that the document be unsealed so the businesses could exercise a right to fight the subpoena in court.

Breaking down the ruling

In assessing whether to enforce the subpoena, Connolly said the threshold question was whether it served a legitimate purpose, sought relevant information, and was not “unduly broad or burdensome.”

Connolly wrote that the investigation pertained to businesses suspected of employing undocumented people, which is in the scope of the agency that issued the subpoena, that the information sought is relevant to that inquiry and that it would not be “unduly burdensome” for the state to copy the 30 records sought by the subpoenas. 

Advertisement

Connolly, who is the court’s chief judge and was appointed by President Donald Trump in 2018, also shot holes in what he described as the state’s “novel theory” that production of such records would endanger the state’s unemployment insurance program.

“I am neither willing nor able to adopt DDOL’s cynical view of the State’s employers,” Connolly wrote. 

Editor’s note: The judge’s ruling can be read at the end of this article.

Having decided that, he turned to the question of whether the Department of Labor had proved the enforcement of the subpoenas would “undermine the integrity of the judicial process.” 

Advertisement

The state argued that enforcement of the subpoena would step on confidentiality regulations in the state’s statue and that the subpoena flows from an “improper purpose” described as an “intense agenda of immigration enforcement.” 

Prior coverage: Delaware to fight ICE, Trump administration demands for local businesses’ employee lists

Connolly ruled that the regulations do not override the subpoena power. He wrote that the state’s argument painting the subpoena as improper because of the current intensity around immigration enforcement is a “political argument, not a legal one.”

“This Court is not the proper ‘forum in which to air [DDOL’s] generalized grievances about the conduct of government,’ Connolly wrote. “It would be wholly inappropriate for me to consider this line of argument, and I decline to do so.”

Trump’s deportation agenda and Delaware

The legal fight is part of the front in Trump’s ever-expanding deportation agenda, which has seen the federal government seek new ways to leverage states’ and other datasets in its immigration roundups.

Advertisement

Trump, with the help of Congress, ballooned Immigration and Customs Enforcement funding nearly six-fold from $12 billion in the previous fiscal year to $75 billion in his budget legislation last year.

Recent: ICE detained a toddler in Delaware as arrests topped 500

The agenda has included workplace and neighborhood raids by masked ICE agents, arrests at jobs and courthouses, incidents resulting in deaths, fast‑tracked deportations and allegations of racial profiling and inhumane detention practices lacking due process.

In Delaware, ICE has more quietly doubled its number of detainments through October of last year compared with the year prior, rounding up more people in street arrests along with four children.

This is a breaking story and updates will follow.

Advertisement

Contact Xerxes Wilson at (302) 324-2787 or xwilson@delawareonline.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

Delaware

ATVs and dirt bikes roar down Delaware Ave., lawmakers search for solutions

Published

on

ATVs and dirt bikes roar down Delaware Ave., lawmakers search for solutions


BUFFALO, N.Y. (WIVB) — It’s just like clockwork. As the temperatures rise, ATVs and dirt bikes shift into gear in Buffalo.

New video shows a horde of ATVs and dirt bikes on Delaware Avenue Sunday afternoon. Some are seen driving on the incoming traffic lane, and one even pops a wheelie.

Fillmore District Councilman Mitch Nowakowski represents this area.

“This only leads to more chaos and disruption, and ultimately leads to potential fatalities for both those that are operating and those that are in the vehicles,” Nowakowski said. “And it’s wrong.”

Advertisement

These all-terrain vehicles have proven to be a persistent problem for drivers over the years in Buffalo. Nowakowski says once the snow melts, he starts hearing complaints about these vehicles from residents.

“It’s making our city’s streets unsafer and the velocity and the volume in which they congregate and the manner in which they drive not only jeopardizes their life, it jeopardizes the life of everyone around them,” Nowakowski said.

The councilman wrote a letter on Monday to Family Court Judge Brenda Freedman, requesting a meeting to discuss strengthening a collective response to reckless driving involving young people.

“Councilwoman Everhart and I want to sit down with the judge, explain what’s happening in our districts, where we see car thefts, we see the Kia boys, which I’ve even been a victim of,” Nowakowski said. “We see the violence on the 33 of drag racing where somebody has lost their life. And we want to know what programs are in place. But then, where’s the accountability once somebody is in your courtroom for a second, third or fourth time?”

Nowakowski said police using better equipment and technology has helped curtail all-terrain vehicles on city streets.

Advertisement

“If it comes from them being able to see it through a drone or people calling in. We’ve seen a curb in that,” Nowakowski said.

Those who see illegal activity or a public nuisance can contact Buffalo Police or the city’s 311 Call & Resolution Center.

Latest Local News