Vermont
Lawmakers Are Closing In on a Package to Reform Education in Vermont | Seven Days
The Vermont Senate on Tuesday overwhelmingly approved an education-reform bill that calls for voluntary school district mergers — leaving the House to weigh in on the compromise legislation that could potentially resolve the biggest issue of the session.
The 27-2 vote in favor of the plan — which lawmakers fine-tuned last week in close consultation with the administration of Gov. Phil Scott — signaled that the legislature and the governor have settled many of their differences about the future of education in Vermont.
The House voted late Tuesday afternoon to form a conference committee to try to quickly work through differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill, including class-size minimums and school-construction aid. If the negotiations go smoothly, the stage could be set for adjournment of the legislature this week.
Tuesday’s development signals that a long-predicted standoff between the governor and the legislature appeared to have been averted.
The governor had advocated for months for mandatory school district mergers, even threatening to keep the legislature in session until it complied with his demand. Lawmakers objected to forced mergers, and instead insisted on local decision-making around consolidation.
Scott ultimately backed down on his ultimatum.
“The governor made a major concession in the context of good-faith negotiations,” Sen. Seth Bongartz (D-Bennington) said on the Senate floor Tuesday. “That showed a willingness to listen and to work with the legislature to achieve something positive for Vermont taxpayers and for Vermont’s children.”
The version of H.955 passed by the Senate Tuesday has the same framework as the bill passed by the House in April, with some notable changes.
It creates seven cooperative education service agencies, or CESAs, regional entities that allow districts to share resources. Within those CESAs, committees would be formed to consider voluntary school district mergers. The bill also calls for a new education funding formula that allots the average student the same base dollar amount rather than leaving spending decisions to local voters.
After the Senate Education and Finance committees failed to produce a bill that leaders deemed suitable, a small group of senators moved into closed-door meetings with several House members and representatives from Gov. Phil Scott’s administration to hammer out a “consensus amendment” that was brought to the floor on Tuesday.
Sen. Ruth Hardy (D-Addison), Senate minority leader Scott Beck (R-Caledonia), Education chair Sen. Seth Bongartz (D-Bennington) and Finance chair Sen. Ann Cummings (D-Washington) worked on the amendment with House committee chairs Rep. Peter Conlon (D-Cornwall), Rep. Emilie Kornheiser (D-Brattleboro), Rep. Pattie McCoy (R-Rutland).
Hardy said in an interview on Monday that legislators told the administration last week that there was no legislative support — in either the Democratic or Republican caucuses — for mandatory school district mergers. Ultimately, Hardy said, Scott’s team accepted the idea of voluntary mergers and the legislators conceded to a shorter timeline for voluntary town votes on school district mergers and the implementation of the new funding formula.
The Senate amendment largely preserves the process laid out in the House bill by which school districts would consider voluntary mergers. Study committees made up of school board members from different districts would be required to take part in facilitated meetings to contemplate mergers into districts of at least 2,000 students. Because merging will not be mandatory, some of those committees might decide to merge while others may not. Some of Vermont’s larger districts may not even have to contemplate merging because they’re already big enough.
Under the Senate’s amendment, merger committees are required to meet by October and finalize their recommendations by September 1, 2027. Voters would then weigh in on mergers on Town Meeting Day 2028, eight months earlier than the November 2028 vote called for in the House bill.
The amendment also puts a nine-year moratorium on towns petitioning to withdraw from school districts, which might happen if residents fear their school would be closed in a bigger district.
“It was mostly just to keep the process from getting too chaotic,” Hardy said.
The amendment also includes language to prevent small districts from being left out of the merger process. Agency of Education officials said last week that could create isolated or “orphan” districts that would be too small to operate efficiently under the new funding formula. Hardy likened such districts to ones that “nobody picked … for the kickball team.”
By November 2029, the State Board of Education must submit a report to the legislature naming school districts with fewer than 750 students that have not successfully merged. Another process laid out in the amendment allows isolated districts to appeal to the legislature in order to merge with a neighboring district.
The amendment also bumps up by one year the date by which the new funding formula would be implemented, to July 1, 2029 — the same date that new school districts and new property tax classifications would formally go into effect. Some smaller districts would likely merge because they wouldn’t be financially viable under the foundation formula unless they achieve greater scale, Hardy said. School districts that merge, or already have 2,000 students, would also be prioritized for school construction aid.
A number of things would have to happen before the new funding formula goes into effect. Those include decisions related to funding for career and technical education, special education, sparse schools, high schools, geographic cost differences, prekindergarten and transportation. A report commissioned by the legislature that will shed more light on those issues is due at the end of this year. The governor wanted to remove those contingencies, Hardy said on the Senate floor on Tuesday, but legislators advocated to keep them.
Not everyone thought that was a good idea.
Sen. Russ Ingalls (R-Essex), one of two Republican senators who voted against the bill, noted that the funding formula was years away from being put into place, and he expressed doubt it would ever come to fruition.

” data-large-file=”https://i0.wp.com/www.sevendaysvt.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IMG_0629-scaled.jpg?fit=780%2C520&ssl=1″ alt=”” class=”wp-image-207469″ srcset=”https://i0.wp.com/www.sevendaysvt.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IMG_0629-scaled.jpg?resize=1024%2C683&ssl=1 1024w, https://i0.wp.com/www.sevendaysvt.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IMG_0629-scaled.jpg?resize=300%2C200&ssl=1 300w, https://i0.wp.com/www.sevendaysvt.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IMG_0629-scaled.jpg?resize=768%2C512&ssl=1 768w, https://i0.wp.com/www.sevendaysvt.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IMG_0629-scaled.jpg?resize=1536%2C1024&ssl=1 1536w, https://i0.wp.com/www.sevendaysvt.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IMG_0629-scaled.jpg?resize=2048%2C1365&ssl=1 2048w, https://i0.wp.com/www.sevendaysvt.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IMG_0629-scaled.jpg?resize=1200%2C800&ssl=1 1200w, https://i0.wp.com/www.sevendaysvt.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IMG_0629-scaled.jpg?resize=550%2C367&ssl=1 550w, https://i0.wp.com/www.sevendaysvt.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IMG_0629-scaled.jpg?resize=800%2C533&ssl=1 800w, https://i0.wp.com/www.sevendaysvt.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IMG_0629-scaled.jpg?resize=2000%2C1333&ssl=1 2000w, https://i0.wp.com/www.sevendaysvt.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IMG_0629-scaled.jpg?resize=780%2C520&ssl=1 780w, https://i0.wp.com/www.sevendaysvt.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IMG_0629-scaled.jpg?resize=400%2C267&ssl=1 400w, https://i0.wp.com/www.sevendaysvt.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IMG_0629-scaled.jpg?resize=706%2C471&ssl=1 706w, https://i0.wp.com/www.sevendaysvt.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IMG_0629-scaled.jpg?w=2340&ssl=1 2340w, https://i0.wp.com/www.sevendaysvt.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IMG_0629-1024×683.jpg?w=370&ssl=1 370w” sizes=”auto, (max-width: 780px) 100vw, 780px”/><figcaption class=)
“We keep talking about a foundation formula,” Ingalls said. “I’m pretty sure we’re gonna see Bigfoot before we see one of those.”
The bill is silent on the role of tuitioning students to independent schools.
“Because the whole private-school thing kind of took over last year’s conversation, I think people this year tried to not make it about private schools,” Hardy said. School choice will be something that has to be addressed at the local level during merger-committee discussions.
Hardy pointed out that the final version of the bill reflects the recommendations of the
redistricting task force that met over the summer and fall to consider drawing a map with consolidated school districts, only to end up rejecting the proposition in favor of a more measured, democratic approach. Gov. Scott previously said that the task force failed to do its job.
Vermont
Poet Joanne McNeil Hayes kicks off park poetry series
Poet Joanne McNeil Hayes is set to kick off the seventh season of the Words in the Woods program at Button Bay State Park in Ferrisburgh.
The event is scheduled for 11 a.m. June 20, according to a community announcement.
Hayes, who grew up in a Chicago suburb, wrote poems about Midwestern life before moving to southern Vermont. Her work has been published in Plum, ENOUGH, Crosswinds and Valley and Beyond.
Her current book of poetry, “I am the Prairie,” explores growing up in the shadow of the Illinois prairie and witnessing patterns of immigration from 1832 to 1900, when Vermont farmers moved to the fertile prairie of that state, according to the announcement.
Vermont Humanities is covering the park entrance fees for the event, allowing attendees to enjoy a full day at the park.
The full schedule is available at vermonthumanities.org/programs/attend/words-in-the-woods-events.
This story was created with the assistance of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Journalists were involved in every step of the information gathering, review, editing and publishing process. Learn more at cm.usatoday.com/ethical-conduct.
Vermont
Vermont Immigration Legal Defense Fund surpasses its $1 million goal year after founding – VTDigger
BURLINGTON — A year ago, the thousands of residents in Vermont seeking U.S. citizenship had just two lawyers in the state who specialized in deportation defense, leaving many to face court alone.
Today there are eight.
That’s according to the organizers of the Vermont Immigration Legal Defense Fund, who announced Monday they had topped its goal of raising $1 million in donations.
The fund has helped state legal organizations grow significantly since May 2025, State Treasurer Mike Pieciak said.
The fund was created by state officials and nonprofit leaders responding to intensified U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations in the state. Federal law does not require the government to provide lawyers in immigration cases because they are civil, not criminal, leaving many of the roughly two dozen people held in Vermont prisons on immigration matters without representation. The fund was designed to close that gap.
The money was raised from thousands of Vermonters and donors across more than 30 states, according to Pieciak.
“The Vermont (Immigration) Legal Defense Fund grant arrived at a critical moment for the refugee and immigrant community we serve,” said Yacouba Jacob Bogre, executive director of the Association of Africans Living in Vermont, an organization that works with new Americans, at a Monday press conference. “As many families navigate uncertainty and changing policies, your support provided more than funding — it provided hope, stability and reaffirmation that they are valued members of our government community.”
Just three months into its launch, the fund reported raising $250,000, which was crucial after federal funding cuts impacted the budgets of organizations supporting immigrants with their legal cases.
Pieciak, alongside Sen. Kesha Ram Hinsdale, D-Chittenden Southeast, helped launch the fund.
“Reaching this goal is a testament to what Vermonters can do when they refuse to look away,” Ram Hinsdale said in a Monday press release. “Just as important as the dollars raised is the plan we leave behind — one that ensures people facing detention or separation will not navigate it alone.”
The impact has been especially pronounced at the Vermont Asylum Assistance Project, a legal services organization that has served more than 300 asylum seekers since its founding in 2021. The number of clients it serves on asylum matters has doubled, from 50 to 100 since 2025, according to executive director Jill Martin Diaz, and the project has screened 130 people detained in Vermont prisons by ICE and secured nine temporary restraining orders.
“We are making incredible progress. We’re doubling our capacity to make sure that our dream is realized,” Diaz said.
Nathan Virag, a staff attorney for the Association of Africans Living in Vermont, said the fund allowed his organization to hire a legal intake coordinator and a legal intern, with hopes of adding another attorney to handle a growing caseload.
“The fund was necessary. Unfortunately, if we didn’t have those funds, we wouldn’t be able to do what we’re doing now,” Virag said.
In Vermont, 1,017 immigration cases remain pending, 45.7% of which have legal representation, up from the 42.8% recorded last summer, according to the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University, based on data collected through April.
Because the fund hit its $1 million target, its fundraising work is officially complete, Pieciak said. But the five recipient organizations plan to keep working together. Those organizations include the Vermont Asylum Assistance Project, the Association of Africans Living in Vermont, Vermont Legal Aid, Vermont Afghan Alliance, The Janet S. Munt Family Room, and the Center for Justice Reform Clinic at the Vermont Law and Graduate School.
“We’ll continue to work with these organizations as we reimagine the structure and the way in which we work together into the future,” said Jesse Bridges, CEO of United Way of Northwest Vermont, the organization that helped administer the funding. “As you say, the court room is the first step in the journey.”
Vermont
After years of stifling heat, Vermont invests nearly $10.5 million in prison air conditioning – VTDigger
After years of complaints from prison staff and incarcerated people about sweltering summer conditions, Vermont has approved its largest investment in cooling state correctional facilities in recent years.
Lawmakers agreed to spend nearly $10.5 million to install prison cooling systems, which appears to be more money than the state put toward the project in the last four years combined, according to state data.
The jump in state investment comes two years after prison staff members filed a workplace safety complaint, alleging they experienced heat stroke-like symptoms.
Most prisons in Vermont have no permanent air conditioning systems throughout, which officials agree leads both staff and incarcerated people to suffer.
“During the summer when we get a heat wave, we get dozens of grievances,” according to Defender General Matt Valerio, whose office is tasked with investigating unresolved complaints from incarcerated people.
Grievances are formal complaints that incarcerated people can file with the Vermont Department of Corrections.
The department has tried to mitigate the heat by providing fans and ice to staff and incarcerated people, according to Haley Sommer, a spokesperson for the department. And while Valerio commends the makeshift efforts, he agrees the state needs a permanent fix to get prison temperatures under control.
The money lawmakers designated for heating, ventilation and air conditioning, or HVAC, will go toward permanent cooling systems as well as short-term remedies. The money is approved for the state’s upcoming fiscal year, which starts next month.
The state plans to use the newly available funds to complete HVAC systems at Southern State Correctional Facility in Springfield and Northern State Correctional Facility in Newport, according to Cole Barney, a spokesperson for the Vermont Department of Buildings and General Services, which handles construction projects on state property.
The state only has building-wide HVAC systems in its prisons in Rutland and South Burlington, according to Sommer. After projects in Newport and Springfield are completed, two Vermont prisons — those in St. Johnsbury and St. Albans — will still lack permanent air conditioning.
Over the years, the state has spent nearly $8.5 million in state bonds, which typically fund the lion’s share of its construction projects, on prison HVAC upgrades across the last four fiscal years, according to data presented to lawmakers this year.
So far the state has installed air conditioning in the infirmary of the Springfield prison, along with creating cooling rooms for staff, according to Sommer. The state has also propped up temporary air conditioning in a number of rooms including the dining area and the gym in the St. Johnsbury prison, she added.
With the new state money, the buildings department expects to have permanent air conditioning completed by fall 2026 at the Springfield prison and by fall 2027 at the Newport prison.
“When correctional facilities were built, there was less of a need for air conditioning because the summers were not as hot,” Sommer said.
And the summer heat is exacerbated by the constraints inherent in a prison, where the windows don’t open and people may spend long hours in a single room, according to Sommer.
Large construction projects can also be particularly challenging to accomplish in prisons, Sommer said, because if construction is going on in a living unit, the department has to relocate the people it usually holds there.
“The impact of not having air conditioning in correctional facilities is felt acutely, both by correctional staff that work there and by incarcerated people that live there,” Sommer said.
The mutual suffering due to heat can create tension between staff and incarcerated people, Valerio said.
“If it’s hot, it’s crowded, people get short-tempered,” he said. It becomes a health and safety problem, Valerio added.
Valerio said he thinks the Corrections Department has done its best trying to manage the heat in prisons. He knows staff provide fans and extra water — and anything helps, he said.
The investment in permanent air conditioning could reduce tensions, he said.
“It’s a good idea.”
-
Nebraska6 minutes agoNebraska Set for National Spotlight at America 250 State Fair in Washington, D.C.
-
Nevada9 minutes agoFilm Review: Adrift in Time and Tide – Mark Jenkin’s “Rose of Nevada”
-
New Hampshire14 minutes agoNH welcomes Gen Z’ers — affordability challenges await – NH Business Review
-
New Jersey21 minutes ago
Several South Jersey corrections officers fired for misconduct
-
New Mexico24 minutes agoEMT student to receive $287,500 from state after injury during training
-
North Carolina29 minutes agoNorth Carolina Democrats propose changes to block GOP power transfers
-
North Dakota36 minutes agoCalendar for June 16-17, 2026
-
Ohio39 minutes agoOhio unveils limited edition ‘I Voted’ sticker for America 250