The Tesla billionaire’s repute for dismissing authorities pronouncements has some frightened that he may flout an unfavorable ruling of the Delaware Courtroom of Chancery, identified for its dealing with of high-profile enterprise disputes.

Musk hopes to win the case that’s headed for an October trial. He’s scheduled to be deposed by Twitter attorneys beginning Thursday.

However the penalties of him dropping badly — both by an order of “particular efficiency” that forces him to finish the deal, or by strolling away from Twitter however nonetheless coughing up a billion {dollars} or extra for breach of contract — has raised issues about how the Delaware courtroom would implement its remaining ruling.

“The issue with particular efficiency, particularly with Elon Musk, is that it’s unclear whether or not the order of the courtroom can be obeyed,” retired Delaware Supreme Courtroom Justice Carolyn Berger informed CNBC in July. “And the courts in Delaware — courts throughout — are very involved about issuing a choice or issuing an order that then is ignored, flouted.”

Berger, who was additionally a vice chancellor of the Chancery Courtroom within the Eighties and Nineteen Nineties, stood by these issues in an interview with The Related Press however mentioned she doubted the Delaware establishment would go as far as to make him full the deal.

“The courtroom can impose sanctions and the courtroom can sort of coerce Musk into taking on the corporate,” she mentioned. “However why would the courtroom try this when what actually is at stake is cash?”

Berger mentioned she expects Twitter to prevail, however mentioned a much less tumultuous treatment for the corporate and its shareholders would make Musk pay financial damages. “The courtroom doesn’t wish to be able to step in and basically run this firm,” she mentioned.

Musk and his legal professionals didn’t reply to requests for remark.

Different authorized observers say such defiance is sort of unattainable to think about, even from a famously combative persona reminiscent of Musk. He acknowledged he may lose in August in explaining why he all of the sudden bought practically $7 billion value of Tesla shares.

“I take him at his phrase,” mentioned Ann Lipton, an affiliate legislation professor at Tulane College. “He desires to win. Possibly he’s obtained his personal judgment as to what the chances are. However he’s additionally being type of sensible about this. He’s getting some money prepared so he doesn’t need to dump his Tesla shares if it seems he’s ordered to purchase the corporate.”

A ruling of particular efficiency might pressure Musk to pay up his $33.5 billion private stake within the deal; the value will increase to $44 billion with promised financing from backers reminiscent of Morgan Stanley.

The Delaware courtroom has powers to implement its orders, and will appoint a receivership to grab a few of Musk’s belongings, particularly Tesla inventory, if he doesn’t comply, in accordance with Tom Lin, a legislation professor at Temple College.

The courtroom has made such strikes earlier than, reminiscent of in 2013 when it held Chinese language firm ZTS Digital Networks in contempt and appointed a receiver with energy to grab its belongings. However after coercive sanctions didn’t work, the receiver requested the courtroom 5 years later to problem bench warrants calling for the arrest of two senior executives the subsequent time they visited the U.S.

Hypothesis that Musk may very well be threatened with jail time for failing to adjust to a ruling is unrealistic, mentioned Berger. “At the least, not for the Courtroom of Chancery,” mentioned the previous choose. “That’s not the best way the courtroom operates.”

However extra essential, Lin mentioned Musk’s authorized advisers will strongly urge him to adjust to the rulings of a courtroom that routinely takes circumstances involving Tesla and different corporations integrated within the state of Delaware.

“In case you are an government at a significant American company integrated in Delaware, it’s very arduous so that you can do enterprise and defy the chancery courtroom’s orders,” Lin mentioned.

Issues about Musk’s compliance derive from his previous conduct coping with varied arms of the federal government. In a long-running dispute with the U.S. Securities and Trade Fee, he was accused of defying a securities fraud settlement that required that his tweets be authorized by a Tesla legal professional earlier than being revealed. He publicly feuded with California officers over whether or not Tesla’s electrical automotive manufacturing facility ought to stay shut down in the course of the early levels of the COVID-19 pandemic.

He’s additionally taken a combative method in Delaware Chancery Courtroom, calling an opposing legal professional a “unhealthy human being” whereas defending Tesla’s 2016 acquisition of SolarCity in opposition to a lawsuit that blamed Musk for a deal rife with conflicts of curiosity and damaged guarantees. He and his legal professionals produce other Delaware circumstances nonetheless pending, together with one involving his compensation package deal at Tesla.

“I believe we’ve obtained a complete lot of gamers who, as free a cannon as Elon Musk is, depend on the goodwill of the Delaware courts on an ongoing foundation for his or her companies,” Lipton mentioned.

Musk’s argument for successful his newest Delaware case largely rests on his allegation that Twitter misrepresented the way it measures the magnitude of “spam bot” accounts which might be ineffective to advertisers. However most authorized specialists consider he faces an uphill battle in convincing Chancellor Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick, the courtroom’s head choose who’s presiding over the case, that one thing modified because the April merger settlement that justifies terminating the deal.

The trial begins Oct. 17 and whichever aspect loses can attraction to the Delaware Supreme Courtroom, which is predicted to behave swiftly. Musk and Twitter might additionally settle the case earlier than, throughout or after the trial, legal professionals mentioned.

Delaware’s courts are well-respected within the enterprise world and any transfer to flout them can be “surprising and sudden,” mentioned Paul Regan, affiliate professor of Widener College’s Delaware Legislation Faculty who has practiced in Delaware courts because the Eighties. “If there was some sort of disaster like that, I believe the reputational hurt can be all on Musk, not the courtroom.”

Join the Fortune Options electronic mail listing so that you don’t miss our largest options, unique interviews, and investigations.