As darkness falls over downtown Dallas, people removed their glasses to observe the moon covering the sun on the Continental Bridge during a solar eclipse.
Dallas, TX
How we got the photo: Capturing the 2024 solar eclipse over Dallas’ Margaret Hunt Hill Bridge
Editor’s note: The Dallas Morning News published many memorable photographs of the 2024 total solar eclipse in Dallas, but one image by Staff Photographer Tom Fox felt so immediately iconic that we devoted the entire front page of our April 9, 2024, print and digital editions to it. Here, we’ve asked Fox to describe what it took to get that photograph. For more of our stories on the eclipse, visit dallasnews.com/eclipse.
Photographing an eclipse takes preparation. Lots of preparation.
Having a set time and place for the event makes it both easier and more difficult. The easy part is you know where the moon is going to be in the sky and when. There are several apps that can assist with this. I use The Photographer’s Ephemeris. But nothing compares to standing in the spot where the picture needs to be taken.
For the four-minute window, I made a couple of trips to the Trinity River bottom, including the day before, at 1:40 p.m.
This is not an exclusive idea, as there were several other photographers who had the same idea, evidenced by little markers in the weedy area. I placed my stake in the ground so I could re-find my spot. On Monday, I befriended some other photographers who were setting up as I anchored my tripod with a bungee cord and dog-leash stake. I set the camera horizontally to capture the cables leading to the apex of the Margaret Hunt Hill Bridge and the total eclipse above it. Knowing the shape of our front page, I left enough room to crop it vertically.
Now for the hard part: What is the exposure in totality? Do I have enough depth of field to ensure that it appears sharp? For that, I leaned on my colleague Smiley Pool, who’s photographed a pair of solar eclipses. Taking into account his moon exposures and the uncertainty of the bridge’s lights turning on, I settled on auto-exposing the image at a high ISO, an f-stop of 11 and Auto White Balance (since the bridge is white). To crib my exposure, I shot the image on RAW, so I could tweak any mistakes later.
I say all this because I wasn’t planning to actually be at the camera to make any adjustments during the eclipse. I was assigned to photograph the scene on the adjacent Ron Kirk Pedestrian Bridge, and I would have to activate the stationary camera remotely at the time of totality. With gracious help from a newfound friend, we coordinated a test shot. Good to go.
As visitors started filing onto the bridge, I was joined by our reporter María Ramos Pacheco and security guard Nick Patel as I set up a 600 mm lens on a large-sensor, mirrorless camera to capture all of the detail. About every 10 to 12 minutes, depending on the clouds, I made photos of the transition going in and out of totality using a solar filter over the end of the lens.
Patel was a godsend. Not only for watching over all of my gear and setups, but for helping me keep my sanity as I desperately searched for the solar filters I had purposely placed for safekeeping in my wagon.
In between the stages of the eclipse, I would venture out for a few minutes trying to capture feature photos of mesmerized people viewing the eclipse with downtown in the distance. Nothing could have prepared me for what most of us have never experienced: a sudden loss of light in the middle of the day. To the east, it appeared as if the sun was rising again behind downtown Dallas; to the west, it appeared to have set. In between, I was scrambling to capture the totality with the long lens, people’s reaction to it with the wider lens, and the remote camera photographing “Large Marge.”
Somehow it all came out, even the two wide-angle GoPro cameras I mounted on the bridge for a time-lapse.
Watch: Time-lapse of darkness falling over the Ron Kirk Pedestrian Bridge near downtown Dallas
Dallas, TX
TxDOT Dallas Seeks Input on Proposed Widening of FM 740/FM 548
The Texas Department of Transportation Dallas District is preparing for in-personal and virtual public hearings on the proposed widening of FM 740/Fm 548.
TxDOT Dallas posted a reminder about the meetings to its social media page on Thursday afternoon.
The purpose of the hearings are to gather public input and provide more information about the proposed reconstruction and widening of FM 740/FM 548 from I-20 to FM 1641 in Mesquite and Forney within Kaufman County.
According to TxDOT, the proposal includes reconstruction of FM740/Fm 548 from a two-lane rural roadway to a four-lane divided urban roadway with raised medians, curb and gutter, a bridge widening at the Mustang Creek crossing, and a 10-foot-wide shared-use path on both sides of the road for approximately four miles.
The roadway passes through the cities of Mesquite and Forney. The existing right-of-way width ranges from 60 feet (along FM 740) to 150 feet (along FM 548). Where proposed right-of-way is needed, the width is generally 130 feet wide.
That means the proposed project would potentially displace three residential and one non-residential structures. Relocation assistance is available for displaced persons and businesses.
The in-person meeting is scheduled for Thursday, April 16 from 5:30-7:30 p.m. at Forney High School (1800 College Ave.).
The virtual hearing will start at 5:30 p.m. and will consist of a prerecorded video presentation. It will remain online for at least the next 15 days and materials can be viewed at any time during that period.
Anyone without internet access may call 214-320-4431 between 8 a.m.-5 p.m. to ask questions and access project materials during the project development project.
View the project materials online here. The materials will also be available in hard copy form for review at the in-person session.
Dallas, TX
NFL Draft Rumor Reveals 5 Teams Cowboys Can Trade Up With But 1 Isn’t Realistic
The Dallas Cowboys are widely viewed as a team that could make a trade up in the first round of the 2026 NFL Draft, and more specifically, from their No. 12 overall pick.
It’s something Dallas should definitely consider given how badly the team needs impact players on defense. And, with a pair of first-round picks, the Cowboys can make a giant leap up, too.
But which teams would be willing to move back to allow Dallas to grab a player it covets? Well, Sports Illustrated’s Albert Breer has just listed them for us.
Breer is reporting that the teams in the Nos. 3-7 picks are looking to move back for more draft capital. That list includes the Arizona Cardinals, Tennessee Titans, New York Giants, Cleveland Browns and Washington Commanders.
“Teams picking behind the Jets are looking to move down,” Breer revealed. “Count the Cardinals, Titans, Giants, Browns and Commanders among those already looking at trying to drop down in the order to accumulate capital. The problem for those five is finding teams to move up.”
Who could Cowboys move up for?
Breer goes on to note that he believes there are two players who could force a team to strike a deal for one of those five picks: Ohio State linebacker Arvell Reese (or Texas Tech’s David Bailey if the Jets take Reese) and Notre Dame running back Jeremiyah Love.
Of course, Reese is one player the Cowboys would likely move up for if given the opportunity, but it would take a gigantic and costly leap. Assuming Dallas would have to move all the way up to No. 3, which is very likely, that move would cost Dallas two first-round picks and then some.
The “and then some” part might sound crazy, but if we’re going off the NFL Draft Trade Value Chart, Dallas’ two first-round picks are worth 2,050 points and Arizona’s No. 3 pick is worth 2,200 points. On top of closing that gap, the Cowboys might have to pay even more to convince a rebuilding team to move down that far.
We just don’t see all that happening, especially when you consider the Cowboys don’t have a second-round pick and might not be able to keep their third-rounder because of this trade.
Cowboys’ trade-up starting point is No. 4
There is a sizeable 400-point difference between the No. 3 and No. 4 picks, so the latter is the most realistic starting point for the Cowboys when it comes to a trade up.
We would probably rule out a trade up with the New York Giants and Washington Commanders because of the whole division rival thing, so cancel out Nos. 5 and 7 as possibilities. That leaves us with Nos. 4 (Titans) and No. 6 (Browns).
Dallas could swing a deal with the Titans that would still give up their first-round picks but the Cowboys can get back the No. 4 selection (1,800 points) and the No. 66 pick (third round, 260 points).
In that scenario, at least the Cowboys get something back beyond the pick they’re moving up for, and more importantly it’s a second Day 2 pick that Dallas doesn’t currently own. Having a pair of third-round picks will also give the Cowboys a chance to move back up into Round 2.
We’re also intrigued by a trade with the Browns because Dallas can get Cleveland’s No. 6 pick and its early second-round pick for its two first-rounders in a trade that is just a 50-point advantage for Cleveland. That would put the Cowboys in the second round.
Now, we need to talk about who the Cowboys would be trading up for in those spots. If Reese or Bailey are available at No. 4, we are making the move up. Styles is another possibility at four, but we would feel more comfortable with him at six. Unfortunately, the Ohio State product doesn’t have a good chance to still be available in that spot.
If the Cowboys can’t get their hands on one of those three players, we would not anticipate them trading up for someone else, but never say never in the NFL Draft.
Dallas, TX
Dallas Mavericks’ Top 3 Priorities During 2026 NBA Offseason
Whether it’s with one of their two first-round picks, via trade or in free agency, the Mavs have to add someone who can lighten Cooper Flagg’s offensive workload. He spent way more time on-ball than expected, and while his self-creation around the basket is impressive, he’ll be best served on a roster that can tap into more of his play-finishing.
Counting on Kyrie Irving isn’t good enough. He is 34 and working his way back from an ACL injury. Dallas needs a short- and long-term alternative.
Addressing the issue in the draft would be ideal, if only because an inbound rookie fits the Flagg window. But that route depends on where the Mavs land in the lottery. They could jump up to AJ Dybantsa or Darryn Peterson territory, end up in range of Darius Acuff Jr. or Kingston Flemings or miss out on all four.
Free agency probably doesn’t hold the answer. Dallas will most likely wind up operating over the cap and have the non-taxpayer’s mid-level exception ($15 million). That doesn’t get you in the door for Austin Reaves, while contingencies like Collin Sexton and Ayo Dosunmu aren’t Plan A material.
Coby White could be interesting if he leaves Charlotte. Otherwise, trade targets who won’t fetch the moon should be the Mavs’ jam: Cam Spencer, Tre Jones, T.J. McConnell, Ty Jerome, Dejounte Murray, etc. If the new front office wants to swing higher, but not too high, Ryan Rollins and Tyler Herro are worth keeping on the radar.
-
Atlanta, GA1 week ago1 teenage girl killed, another injured in shooting at Piedmont Park, police say
-
Georgia1 week agoGeorgia House Special Runoff Election 2026 Live Results
-
Arkansas4 days agoArkansas TV meteorologist Melinda Mayo retires after nearly four decades on air
-
Pennsylvania1 week agoParents charged after toddler injured by wolf at Pennsylvania zoo
-
Milwaukee, WI1 week agoPotawatomi Casino Hotel evacuated after fire breaks out in rooftop HVAC system
-
Austin, TX7 days agoABC Kite Fest Returns to Austin for Annual Celebration – Austin Today
-
World1 week agoZelenskyy warns US-Iran war could divert critical aid from Ukraine
-
World1 week agoIndonesia receives bodies of peacekeepers killed in southern Lebanon