Why you don’t see recommendations for Texas Senate
Robert Roberson hearing raises profound questions about guilt
By the time the Dallas City Council started talking about using DART as a piggy bank to solve its pension woes earlier this year, discontent with the transit agency and a desire for change were hardly new. Suburban leaders who support reducing DART’s sales tax funding had been having discussions about clawing money back from the transit agency for years.
But after the city council of DART’s largest member publicly broached the idea, it set off a domino effect among suburbs that had kept their discontents more or less at a low grumble. The result is likely to be an ugly spat at the 89th Texas Legislature and probably a diminished regional transit system.
Now Dallas is walking it all back. The City Council voted earlier this month to support keeping DART fully funded as part of its legislative agenda. But the council is acting as if it wasn’t the spark on dry tinder.
Dallas’ leadership on the question of DART’s future has been weak at best, and when it has led at all, it has largely been in the wrong direction. This kind of dysfunction and indecisiveness has real consequences for the city and the region.
Since it was founded in 1983, DART has been primarily funded through a 1% sales tax on every dollar spent in the 13 member cities. That collection totaled about $834 million in fiscal year 2023. The largest share of that came from Dallas – a little over $400 million.
But while Dallas pays the most in, it also gets the greatest return. Just think about the stretch of four converging light-rail lines that runs through the core of downtown. And that’s to say nothing of the city’s many bus routes and other DART modes of transit like GoLink.
According to an EY study completed earlier this year, in fiscal year 2023, Dallas contributed $407.8 million in sales tax dollars to DART. But the cost of providing service in the city was $690.2 million. That means Dallas got nearly a 70% return on its investment — or about $282 million worth of service that it didn’t pay for.
Now, look at Plano’s cost vs. benefit. It contributed nearly $110 million in FY 2023 and got $44.8 million in service, according to EY (formerly Ernst & Young). That’s the sort of disparity Dallas might not have wanted to raise a lot of attention around.
We’ve long known that the suburbs subsidize the cost of transit in Dallas, but that’s more than we imagined.
Words have consequences, especially when they come from the governing body of one of Texas’ largest cities — and the center of DART’s service area. It’s good that Dallas is singing a different tune now, but the City Council’s open discussion has created an air of permissiveness about targeting DART.
Whatever comes of this debate about DART’s future, we hope this serves as a lesson for the city. In the world of politics, it’s critically important to think before you open a can of worms.
We welcome your thoughts in a letter to the editor. See the guidelines and submit your letter here. If you have problems with the form, you can submit via email at letters@dallasnews.com
DALLAS – Dallas City Council members approved a measure to explore options for leaving Dallas City Hall while, but left the door open to staying in the iconic building.
What we know:
The resolution approved will explore options to buy or lease a new City Hall building. It was amended to include a plan to pay for repairs to the current building that would be compared side by side to the options to leave.
Dallas City Council approved the resolution by a 9-6 vote. The vote came around 1 a.m. Thursday morning after 14 hours of debate.
Councilman Chad West told FOX 4’s Lori Brown that if the city decides to stay or leave City Hall, the resolution includes proposals to redevelop the land around the building.
“We still should be looking at redevelopment options to tie it into the convention center later on, because otherwise it just equals ghost town, which is what we have now,” West said. “And of course, if we decide to move and City Hall itself gets repurposed or demolished and something gets built there, we need to have a projected plan for what that could look like as well.”
Local perspective:
Around 100 residents spoke about their desire to keep the current Dallas City Hall, the historic structure designed by architect I.M. Pei.
“The thought of losing this land to private hands is disheartening. A paid-off asset, unfair to taxpayers, built on what is here,” Meredith Jones, a Dallas resident, said.
“The decision belongs to the people, not the city council,” David Boss, the former manager of Dallas City Hall, said.
Several questioned why the price tag for a repair is public knowledge, but the cost for a move isn’t.
“The public deserves to know the value of the land we are giving up. Dallas deserves a careful decision, not a rushed one,” resident Azael Alvarez said.
Dallas City Council went back and forth on the resolution, amending it before it finally passed. Much of the conversation revolved around the Dallas Mavericks’ potential interest in the site for a new arena.
Mayor Eric Johnson lamented that conversation revolved around the Mavs’ future and not City Hall itself.
“A conversation about a particular sports team and where you want them should never have been part of the conversation because that was not what was infront of us,” Johnson said. “I’ve never seen such vehement opposition to gathering more information.”
Councilwoman Cara Mendelsohn wore a Mavericks T-shirt to a recent hearing due to the continued conversation around them.
“We’re talking a lot about the Mavs. They’re the elephant in the room, but they’re actually not here, so let’s at least let them have a seat at the horseshoe,” Mendelsohn said on Monday.
Residents were also upset at the idea of City Hall being bulldozed to make way for a new Mavs arena.
“The Mavericks were ridiculed nationally, and still are. Worst trade in the history of the NBA,” one resident said Monday. “The decision to knock this building down without all the facts and allowing the people to make the decision is your Luka Dončić trade.”
The backstory:
Experts who assessed Dallas City Hall said the 47-year-old building’s mechanical, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, and electrical systems don’t meet modern standards.
It put a $906 million to $1.4 billion price tag on keeping the iconic building, which was designed by the famous Chinese architect I.M. Pei, for another 20 years.
Downtown Dallas Inc., an advocacy group for Downtown Dallas, said last week they support leaving the current City Hall site.
“We believe Dallas City Hall is no longer serving its intended purpose. The important functions that happen and must continue to be evolved and innovated within our city government are inefficient and truly stymied in that space,” said Jennifer Scripps, President and CEO of Downtown Dallas Inc. told the crowd. “Our board called a special called meeting and voted unanimously in support of pursuing options to relocate City Hall and redevelop the site. We were we feel that the opportunity is huge.”
The Source: Information in this story came from FOX 4 reporting.
How much do you earn? And how far does that paycheck really go?
In Dallas, a $100,000 salary is a figure that’s more than double the area’s individual median income, but nevertheless a useful benchmark for the region’s burgeoning business community. However — once taxes and the local cost of living is factored in — it has the effective purchasing power of around $80,000 according to a new financial report.
Consumer-focused fintech site SmartAsset worked the numbers on the country’s 69 largest cities, determining the “estimated true value of $100,000 in annual income” in each location by measuring federal, state and local taxes as well as local cost of living data, including on housing, groceries and utilities.
It used its own proprietary figures, as well as information from the Council for Community and Economic Research.
Related
Despite recent research suggesting North Texas has lately been losing some of its famous economic advantage — a major factor behind the region’s explosive growth — Dallas actually fared relatively well in SmartAsset’s analysis. Of the 69 cities, Dallas’ effective purchasing power, of $80,103 on the $100,000 salary, tied with Nashville to rank 22nd highest.
Like many cities in the report, Dallas also actually saw a year-over-year effective salary bump, likely because of slightly lower effective tax rates and living costs that have hewed closer to the national average. In 2024, the value of a $100,000 salary in Dallas came out to $77,197.
Other large Texas cities fared even better than Dallas. El Paso, where SmartAsset calculated the effective value of the $100,000 salary at nearly $90,300, ranked third highest overall.
San Antonio, where the effective value was around $86,400, ranked eighth. Houston, where the figure was around $84,800, ranked 10th, and Austin, where the figure was $82,400, ranked 17th.
Oklahoma City topped SmartAsset’s value ranking, with an effective salary of around $91,900, and Manhattan, which the website considered as its own city, came in with the lowest value, at around $29,400.
Dallas’ relatively strong effective value score won’t necessarily translate to the good life: Another financial report, published in November by the website Upgraded Points, determined that even a single adult with no kids needs a pre-tax salary of at least $107,000 to live “comfortably” in the Metroplex.
Exclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
Setting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin
Mother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
AM showers Sunday in Maryland
Massachusetts man awaits word from family in Iran after attacks
Florida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
2026 OSAA Oregon Wrestling State Championship Results And Brackets – FloWrestling