Brittani Brooks isn’t worried she might lose her job, unlike many of her peers.
The Pulaski Heights Middle School librarian works in the Little Rock School District, which hasn’t seen the backlash that other areas of the state have against books depicting a diverse set of human experiences, so she publicly opposed a law that would change how libraries handle materials some consider inappropriate.
Other school librarians don’t have the same sense of security. The Arkansas Advocate reached out to several in different parts of the state and received few responses. Those that did respond declined to speak publicly due to fear of retaliation.
Advertisement
School librarians’ anxieties come from recent state laws governing the availability of books and the sharing of ideas in schools: Act 372 of 2023, the bill Brooks spoke against twice, and the Arkansas LEARNS Act, a wide-ranging education overhaul championed by Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders.
“I think the unspoken intention [of the law and its supporters] was more about fear, miscommunication and self-censorship, and I think they’ve achieved that, and it’s only going to get worse in schools,” Brooks said.
Act 372 would create criminal liability for librarians who distribute content that some consider “obscene” or “harmful to minors” — two terms that the law does not define — and put the availability of challenged books in the hands of elected officials.
Advertisement
In July, a federal judge blocked the portions of Act 372 pertaining to criminal liability and city or county elected officials’ authority over books in response to a lawsuit from 18 plaintiffs.
But the section of the law giving school boards the power to handle appeals for challenged school library books wasn’t enjoined and went into effect Aug. 1.
Additionally, the LEARNS Act prohibits “indoctrination” of children in schools but does not define the term. Those who oppose “indoctrination” in libraries and classrooms often cite LGBTQ+ topics and systemic racism as the information they do not want children to have.
As a result, some school libraries and districts have become “very strict about how books are chosen and how books are ordered,” trying to preemptively avoid accusations or legal trouble, Brooks said.
Advertisement
In districts where the debate over library content is especially charged, some librarians have found themselves wondering whether they can trust their colleagues after the idea that librarians are harming children has permeated their professional environments.
Hendrix College Library Director Britt Murphy works closely with K-12 librarians throughout the state and said she is aware of the self-censorship and fear affecting their jobs.
“Even when there aren’t laws to restrict our First Amendment rights, or even when we’re questioning them and they might be thrown out, unfortunately [public sentiment] has already done its dirty work because of the fear factor among librarians,” Murphy said. “It’s a real shame.”
Advertisement
‘Interference’
Act 372 requires school principals to select “a committee of licensed personnel,” which can include the principal, to be the first to review library materials challenged on the basis of “appropriateness.”
If the committee chooses to keep the book available to children, challengers can appeal the decision to the school board, which will then decide whether the book should remain in place or be relocated somewhere that minors cannot access.
Tess Vrbin/Arkansas AdvocateFrom left: Middle school librarian Brittani Brooks and transgender activists Rumba Yambú and Jessica Disney listen to testimony against the bill that became Act 372 of 2023 before the House Judiciary Committee on March 7, 2023. All three spoke against the bill.
All school and public libraries already had procedures in place to handle book challenges before Act 372 was introduced this year. Brooks reminded the House Judiciary Committee that school libraries must have content reconsideration policies in order to be accredited by the state Department of Education.
She also said school librarians across Arkansas were removing books from shelves “behind closed doors,” since other states have also passed policies limiting what topics can be shared or discussed in schools.
Florida is one of those states. Books challenged or removed from shelves in Florida have frequently been by or about racial minorities, including civil rights activist Rosa Parks. The state also passed a law, known as “don’t say gay,” prohibiting the discussion of sexual orientation in K-12 classrooms.
Advertisement
Arkansans who spoke against Act 372 while it was moving through the Legislature expressed concerns that influxes of book challenges under the new law would create an undue burden on school and public librarians.
This adds to librarians’ anxieties about Act 372, since they already had “a really effective policy procedure” for book challenges, Murphy said. She called the new policy “overkill” and “interference with what librarians do,” especially since librarians are “rule-followers with strong feelings about the First Amendment.”
“I don’t think there was a lot of understanding or thought put into the practicalities of how imposing this new procedure on librarians would take place,” Murphy said.
Implementation and restriction
Public opposition to LGBTQ+ books in Arkansas schools predates both Act 372 and the LEARNS Act, though it varies by district and region.
The Conway school board removed two LGBTQ+ books from school libraries in October 2022. At the same meeting, the board approved a policy requiring transgender students to use bathrooms and locker rooms according to their gender assigned at birth.
Advertisement
Meanwhile in Northwest Arkansas, the Farmington school board restricted two books to readers age 17 and older in March after a parent voiced concerns. The school librarian, principal and three teachers formed a committee to handle the book challenges, and after the committee voted to retain the books, the school board overrode the decision, according to the Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette and documents received via a public records request.
The process played out similarly to the one outlined in Act 372, which had not yet passed the Legislature at the time.
Sanders signed the law March 31, and the Arkansas Department of Education has since provided schools with some instructions on how to comply with Act 372.
Former Fayetteville High School Librarian Cassandra Barnett, who now works for ADE, supervised the Act 372 training. Barnett and two other school librarians wrote a letter to the Fayetteville school board in 2005, defending their jobs and their libraries against public accusations of misconduct by having books on the shelves that depicted sexual content and LGBTQ+ people.
Librarians said they needed the state’s input on the law to put their minds at ease, due to the since-blocked criminal liability portion of Act 372.
Advertisement
Act 372 information for school libraries (Source: Arkansas Department of Education via Freedom of Information Act request)
Barnett told librarians they would have to relocate books to where minors cannot reach them if school boards say so. This would mean only school faculty, staff and 18-year-old high school seniors would have access to relocated books.
In response to questions about the implementation of Act 372, ADE spokeswoman Kimberly Mundell said it is up to each district to determine compliance in its policies and selections of library materials.
“We encourage districts to read the law and consult with their legal counsel if they have any questions, as it is essential that the law be upheld,” Mundell said. “Parents have the right to know what information and materials their children have access to at school, and transparency on the local level is important.”
Advertisement
Vague policy ‘by design’
The lawsuit against Act 372 will go to trial in October 2024, but the unchallenged sections of the law are likely to remain up to interpretation regardless of whether U.S. District Judge Timothy Brooks declares the challenged sections unconstitutional.
The judge wrote in his 49-page ruling that the “lack of clarity seems to have been by design” in the blocked portion of Act 372 giving city or county elected officials the power to relocate library books.
“By keeping the pivotal terms vague, local governing bodies have greater flexibility to assess a given challenge however they please rather than how the Constitution dictates,” he wrote.
The language in the section pertaining to school boards is nearly identical.
At the start of the 2023 school year, the Pulaski County Special School District cut students’ access to the Central Arkansas Library System’s online educational materials program, citing the lack of a “filter” in the database and seeking “more clarity as to what’s acceptable and what’s not” under Act 372, district spokeswoman Jessica Duff said.
Advertisement
PCSSD will reinstate access to the program in January with the condition of parental permission, the district announced earlier this month.
Regarding the books available at PCSSD libraries, Duff said the district and its librarians “do not have any concerns” about job security and “continue to stock their libraries with content that best suits the needs of their students.”
Brooks, the Pulaski Heights Middle School librarian, said she is confident that none of the books in her library run afoul of the undefined terms in Act 372 and the LEARNS Act.
“One thing I always tell people is, ‘We know we don’t indoctrinate kids. We don’t,’” she said. “…I’m not going to go around proving that I don’t. They would have to prove that I do.”
Arkansas Advocate is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Arkansas Advocate maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Sonny Albarado for questions: info@arkansasadvocate.com. Follow Arkansas Advocate on Facebook and Twitter.
Private School Abuse: At an Arkansas school, a boy was hit by the school’s founder and attacked by classmates in a group session the founder led, prompting a complaint and her arrest.
State Money Still Flows: Despite a jail term for the school’s founder, The Delta Institute for the Developing Brain continues to operate and Arkansas still sends it public funds.
Unregulated and Growing: By design, private schools get little oversight in Arkansas even as new opportunities to receive state money have spurred a boom in openings since 2023.
These highlights were written by the reporters and editors who worked on this story.
At her private school just beyond the city limits of Jonesboro, Arkansas, Mary “Tracy” Morrison demanded the attention of the 19 students seated on the floor in a circle. She then directed a skinny 13-year-old boy wearing a cartoon Mario shirt to sit in the center.
“Raise your hand if he’s ever been mean to you — ever,” Morrison, the owner, prompted the other middle schoolers, and some hands shot up.
“Most people don’t think you’re a nice kid. You lie. You lie all the time,” she told the boy. She encouraged his classmates to name things they don’t like about him.
Morrison’s voice got louder. She knelt inside the circle just inches from the boy and swatted him. On the head. On the neck. At first he flinched and started to raise his hands to block her. But she snapped at him to keep his arms down: “You don’t have the right!”
Advertisement
“Come over here and put your hands on him, however you want,” Morrison told the students.
A boy volunteered. “I’ll do it,” he said, and the other students cheered and clapped.
That student entered the circle, looped his arm around the boy’s neck and choked him. Morrison gave him a high-five. The boy in the center cowered. Then other students took turns slapping, pinching and punching the boy. Morrison picked up a footlong plastic cylinder — it resembled a pipe — and thwacked him over and over, calling him a liar.
The attack went on for nearly 40 minutes. At the end, Morrison made the boy apologize to his classmates for mistreating them. Three other school employees were in the room that day in April 2025 but didn’t intervene. The whole thing was captured on video.
Advertisement
An occupational therapist named Mary “Tracy” Morrison opened a private school just outside Jonesboro, Arkansas, in 2024, after the state made public money available for families to spend on private school tuition. A “group discussion” that Morrison led, in which she encouraged other students to assault a 13-year-old boy, resulted in criminal charges and jail time.Excerpts of video from The Delta Institute for the Developing Brain obtained by ProPublica. Faces blurred in original video.
Morrison had founded her school, The Delta Institute for the Developing Brain, the year before, soon after Arkansas legislators decided to allow families to use public money for private school tuition through its Education Freedom Account program.
Delta Institute joined a surge of new private schools in Arkansas, mirroring a national proliferation. New schools are opening at a fast clip as state legislatures set aside more public money for parents to spend at private schools, without meaningful oversight.
There were about 100 private schools in Arkansas in 2023, state records show. Now there are about 220. That doesn’t count the 100 or so microschools in the mix — a version of the one-room schoolhouse that wasn’t tracked or publicly funded previously.
But even with that boom, Arkansas largely has chosen not to regulate private or microschools or monitor what’s happening inside them. Arkansas is so hands-off that the state only requires that private schools conduct regular fire drills, keep immunization records and have an American flag and a flagpole. It doesn’t review schools’ curriculum or the backgrounds and capabilities of their operators. Anyone is free to open one, including Morrison.
Known to parents and students as Dr. Tracy, she wasn’t a licensed educator and had never run a school before. Her resume says she has a doctorate in occupational therapy and cognitive neuroscience from Washington University in St. Louis. The university said that degree is only in occupational therapy.
Advertisement
The Delta Institute didn’t look much like a school — it operated in a white colonial house set down a gravel driveway off a country road, its bedrooms transformed into classrooms. But it had seemed like the answer that parents of students with disabilities, including autism, were desperately seeking. Families said they put their faith in Morrison, who presented herself as an expert in autism and ADHD. “I am the best,” she texted one parent.
Tell Us About Your Experience With School Vouchers
If your child has disabilities and you’ve used — or were unable to use — school voucher programs, we’d like to hear about your experience.
Haley Clark/ProPublica
Morrison did not respond to interview requests and questions from ProPublica.
Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, who has said she wants to be known as the education governor, and state education officials didn’t respond to specific questions from ProPublica about the state’s oversight of private schools or how it responded to revelations about the Delta Institute. Her spokesperson said the governor championed the state’s Education Freedom Accounts because they give students more and different educational opportunities.
Advertisement
Both the governor’s office and the Arkansas Department of Education emphasized that the state intervenes to ensure students are safe and taxpayer dollars are spent responsibly. “Student safety is ADE’s number one priority,” Education Department spokesperson Kaelin Clay wrote in an email.
The day after Morrison and the children assaulted her son, the boy’s mother walked into the Craighead County Sheriff’s Office to write out a report in neat, looping cursive. It was not the first report about Morrison’s treatment of children at the Delta Institute that the sheriff’s office took.
Another mother had reported abuse about three weeks earlier.
More Money Fuels Growth
Before Arkansas’ LEARNS Act passed in 2023, creating its voucher-style program, state schools secretary Jacob Oliva promised that “there is going to be accountability for the schools that participate.”
Advertisement
But the oversight role his department gave itself was related primarily to finances. The department has the power to conduct random financial audits of private schools, mandate that the schools report their tuition and fees and require schools to measure student achievement with tests of their choosing, but little else.
Under pressure to tweak the rules this spring, the department again declined to monitor school quality and tinkered only with how parents can use the funds on items other than tuition, banning them from paying for travel sports teams, for instance. Even that was controversial; some lawmakers argued there should be less government interference. They argue the onus is on parents to decide whether their children are safe and learning, and if they’re not, the families can go somewhere else.
This upcoming school year, Arkansas expects that nearly 55,000 students will use their Education Freedom Accounts for tuition and other expenses.
With most students getting about $7,000 each, the program cost about $310 million in taxpayer funds this past school year. Most of the students who used EFA money in Arkansas the prior year were already attending private school or being homeschooled, or were just starting kindergarten. Only 12% of participants reported that they’d previously attended a public school.
When the program began, the department set up a hotline and an email address for people to report suspected fraud or misuse of the EFA funds. About a dozen emails raised concerns about student well-being.
Advertisement
Do you have a tip about a school? A story about using — or not being able to use — vouchers? We need your help to understand how voucher-style programs are affecting families across the country.
But several complainants told ProPublica that they did not hear from state officials after sharing their concerns. One teacher said she got no response after she emailed in April that students who transferred to her school had been deprived of a “basic education” at the microschool they previously attended, according to state records. She said first and second graders reported that they had spent the majority of their time playing.
Contacted by a ProPublica reporter, she said: “I don’t mind that you are reaching out but it is very concerning and in a way aggravating that I have an investigative reporter reaching out instead of my own state.” She requested that her name not be made public because she works at a different microschool.
Jazzmin Little said she hasn’t heard back from state officials either, after telling them in February that the school where she sent her two children might be misusing state funds. The department told her it would review the information, according to emails, but she said she heard nothing more.
“All kinds of red flags I sent to them and they never got back to me,” Little said. “I don’t even know if anyone has looked at it.” The school’s founder confirmed that the Education Department did not reach out to her after receiving the parent’s complaint, which she described as a billing discrepancy. She said the issue would have been resolved sooner if the state had intervened.
Advertisement
In order to accept EFA money, private schools have to agree to meet some requirements, including that they have or are seeking accreditation, have operated for a year and promise to perform background checks and fingerprinting on all employees. (There’s no requirement that employees have no criminal history.) Schools affirm they’ll teach English, math, science and social studies and administer a standardized test of their choosing once a year. There’s no requirement to report students’ individual test scores to the state or to parents.
The bar is lower for microschools, some of which operate like smaller versions of private schools while others provide programs for homeschoolers. They don’t need to be accredited or wait until they’ve been open for a year to get funding.
The contrast with what is required for public schools is striking. Arkansas’ Education Department monitors public schools, and state law regulates nearly every aspect of them, from teacher qualifications to what’s on district websites. Every district is required to post a tranche of “state-required information” online that must include breakdowns of monthly expenses and even a list of every dyslexia intervention program used.
State Sen. Bryan King, a Republican, said he supports school choice but said he voted against the LEARNS Act because there wasn’t enough accountability given the amount of public spending. He proposed legislation this spring that would have required all schools receiving EFA funds to administer the same standardized test — and for funding to be tied to student performance on that exam.
“We can’t afford this and my concerns were about financial responsibility, accountability, transparency, everything about it,” he said.
Advertisement
The proposal did not advance. King was attacked in the primary this year for being against “education freedom,” and Sanders backed his opponent. King still prevailed.
None of the legislators who were the lead sponsors of the LEARNS Act responded to questions from ProPublica about how the state is overseeing student achievement and safety.
Several Arkansas groups recently tried to get an amendment on the November ballot that would require all schools that accept EFA funds to follow the same rules and minimum academic requirements as public schools. The groups, however, failed to gather enough signatures.
“If you are going to take public money, then you should meet public standards and be publicly accountable for how that money is spent,” said Bill Kopsky, executive director of the Arkansas Public Policy Panel, a nonprofit that was formed in the 1960s and focuses on social justice.
He said the state’s recent voucher expansion has led to “this whole new industry of pop-up, subprime private schools that have almost no regulation. They go into shopping malls or the basements of churches,” he said.
Advertisement
In the three years of the EFA program, the state has only intervened at two schools, records show. And it’s never permanently blocked a school from taking public money, including at the Delta Institute — even after it became clear that terrible things had happened there.
“You Are in the Biggest Trouble”
Craighead County Sheriff’s Detective David Bailey, a Jonesboro native who patrolled the area often, didn’t even know there was a school set back off the country road.
He discovered the Delta Institute in the winter of 2025 after a student ran off and the school asked for help finding him. He didn’t know it at the time, but police and child-welfare records show the boy had allegedly fled after Morrison sprayed him in the face with water and held his legs down. He jumped out a window, barefoot, to get away.
The Craighead County Sheriff’s Office encountered the school again in March 2025 when Renee Johns, whose children Jacob and Addison went to the Delta Institute, reported abuse there.
Johns had moved her family to Jonesboro from about an hour away to attend the school. But things had unraveled. Jacob wasn’t getting the therapy he needed, and he and his sister were falling behind academically. But Johns said she was most troubled by a video Morrison had texted her one day to explain why Jacob was being kept after school.
Advertisement
It showed Jacob, a 10-year-old with autism, and two other boys scrubbing the floor and walls inside the school with rags. Morrison berated them: “This doesn’t get to be about fun. Go!”
“Both hands, cleaning!” she barked like a drill sergeant to one boy on his hands and knees. “You’re working like a slug! Get at it! Get at it! You are in the biggest trouble.”
The owner of an Arkansas private school is heard berating students while they scrub floors and walls. The owner sent the video to a student’s mother to explain why the boy was being kept after school.Obtained and redacted by ProPublica. Two of the children’s names and faces are redacted to protect their identities.
The sheriff’s office alerted child-welfare authorities. Then, three weeks later, a second mother walked in to report her son’s assault within the circle at school. Bailey got a warrant for that video.
Teacher and counselor Ashley Williams was standing by while another employee copied the footage of Morrison berating, hitting and directing other students to assault the 13-year-old boy. Horrified, she excused herself, hustled down the stairs of the house, out to the gravel parking area, and vomited.
Advertisement
Less than 12 hours earlier, Williams had filed a detailed report with welfare authorities based on what some students had told her about Morrison’s “circle time.” She had written, “This is not the first time abuse like this has happened.” Months earlier, she continued, Morrison had taped two children together by their arms.
More came out in Bailey’s interviews with parents and current and former employees and in interviews that child advocates conducted with the students, documents show: allegations of “waterboarding” a child and cutting another’s hair as punishment. Slapping a student. A wooden paddle named Fred.
Some parents, meanwhile, defended Morrison and praised her “unorthodox methods,” according to interviews and police records.
Morrison worked to keep parents on her side. She texted a large group of staff members, some whose children attended the school, to say she had made a mistake during the “group discussion” but blamed the violence on the students.
She warned that the floor-scrubbing video she had sent Johns would likely be made public and that she and the other employees would be arrested. “You can expect our mug shots on social media,” Morrison said, and apologized for letting everyone down. But she also called it a “witch hunt.”
Advertisement
“My mug shot will have me with a middle finger,” she wrote.
Flimsy Investigations
Within days of the April 2025 incident that the prosecutor called a “makeshift ‘Fight Club,’” Morrison was charged with 11 felony counts of permitting child abuse and other related crimes. Three other employees were charged with permitting child abuse and failure to report child maltreatment.
The day news broke about Morrison’s arrest, the state Education Department stopped EFA payments to the Delta Institute. Nearly half the students there were using the EFA program to pay tuition, and the school had collected more than $300,000 so far.
There are no records of a visit to the school or an investigation by the state Department of Education. When asked if the department had gone to The Delta Institute for the Developing Brain, officials did not answer. Instead, a spokesperson said that complaints or suspicious activity triggers a review and “often results in a site visit,” though they declined to say how often that has happened.
Reporters again asked the department directly if it had visited the school. The spokesperson responded: “We have addressed the Developing Brain’s suspension from the EFA program multiple times, including in statements sent to your outlet.”
Advertisement
At Delta, public money flowed again two days after it was stopped. An assistant education commissioner who oversees the EFA program told a colleague he was convinced that the school had implemented “appropriate safeguards,” according to an email. He wrote that Morrison had resigned as the head of the school and a new school board had been formed.
In the three school years of the EFA program, records show, state education officials have temporarily suspended funding to one other school, a Christian-based microschool called Homestead Academy that focuses on outdoor and individualized education. It rents space from a church near Hot Springs. Outside, there’s a playground and hammocks, as well as a red-and-white striped shed painted with “In God we trust” where fireworks are sold in the summer.
Over a month last fall, the state got a series of concerning calls and emails from parents and at least one former teacher, records show.
Some shared safety concerns or described children playing unsupervised in a wooded area. Others shared concerns about insufficient academic instruction. One caller said Homestead felt more like a daycare than an organized school. In the first few months of the school year, 13 of the 46 students withdrew, state records show.
“Please stop” funding the school, one parent pleaded.
Advertisement
Homestead Academy, a microschool in Pearcy, Arkansas. Despite complaints from parents and a former teacher, the school still receives state funding.Katie Adkins for ProPublica
Oliva, the state education secretary, heard directly from a Homestead parent who said the school did not follow a curriculum and had not adhered to the education plan for her daughter.
“Why are there not stronger regulations and accountability measures for EFA-funded programs?” she wrote in bold letters. (The parent asked that her name not be used because she works in education and fears retaliation.)
“This sounds like a serious and dire situation,” Oliva wrote back to her. “We will review immediately.”
A state education employee reached out to Homestead’s owner in late October and told her that the department would be stopping by the next day for a “brief visit.”
While there, Education Department employees watched students say the Pledge of Allegiance and then observed 10 to 15 minutes of instruction before meeting with owner Lindsey McCollum.
Advertisement
When asked for student work, progress reports and discipline policies, McCollum said she would send them later. “In hindsight, we should have said we were happy to wait while they made copies for us, but we did not,” according to an employee’s written report about the visit.
Afterward, the state suspended EFA funding to the school. Oliva told McCollum in a letter: “Your actions have jeopardized the welfare of students and the responsible use of public funds.”
It took 10 weeks for EFA funds to flow again. The state required that McCollum provide certain documentation and was satisfied by her response: a financial review of the school, policies on student supervision, curriculum plans and student worksheets. Several parents also sent letters in support of the school, describing it as a nurturing environment where their students enjoyed learning.
“We were compliant and transparent,” McCollum said in an interview. She noted that both she and the other teacher at the school are certified educators and stressed that “student safety is of utmost importance and our school has procedures in place.”
The school, she said, is almost entirely funded through the EFA program, with about 30 students from kindergarten to ninth grade. She said almost all students have returned year after year. “Families have the option to choose and still are choosing us,” she said.
Advertisement
“We have families who know that their kids who hated learning are now loving to read and write and loving to learn,” McCollum said. “That is our heartbeat.”
The state Education Department said it “wastes no time” in suspending private schools from receiving public money, and that both Homestead and Delta convinced the state that they were worthy of being reinstated. “In both instances, we worked vigorously to ensure operations were flipped in the right direction before families were allowed to spend taxpayer dollars on either school,” according to the department’s statement to ProPublica.
The parent who emailed Oliva said that she had enrolled her 10-year-old daughter at Homestead hoping for something different than the public school. But she said her daughter fell behind academically. Last fall, she pulled her from the school and reenrolled her in public school.
She didn’t know that the state had restored funding to Homestead until told by a reporter.
“No way,” she said. “This has to be happening with other microschools. That upsets me for the children of Arkansas.”
Advertisement
Still Open for Business
The Delta Institute for the Developing Brain. The founder, Mary “Tracy” Morrison, was jailed for permitting child abuse.Houston Cofield for ProPublica
Enrollment at the Delta school dropped to about 60 students for last school year, about half the size it was the year before.
“There was a lot of loss because of the negative media,” Adrian Sportsman, who has worked closely with Morrison at the school, said when a ProPublica reporter visited this spring. “I feel like it was blown way out of proportion.”
Some students came back, she said: “They’d say, ‘There’s no school like this school.’”
In March, the mother of the boy who was assaulted in the circle at school sued Morrison, her school, her therapy business and her insurance companies seeking compensatory and punitive damages for what happened to her son. In court filings, Morrison’s attorney denied the allegations and said “the video speaks for itself.”
The criminal cases were set to go to trial in May and June. None did. Charges were dismissed for two employees who authorities felt were less culpable as they’d been in the classroom only briefly. The two employees did not respond to a reporter’s outreach.
A third staffer, Kathrine Lipscomb, who is an Arkansas-licensed teacher, interjected at times to direct the children to listen to Morrison and raise their hands to speak. In response to a reporter’s question about her role in the incident, she explained in an email: “For part of the time, I was off behind the teachers desk planning for another class and not paying attention to the circle.”
Advertisement
The prosecutor and Lipscomb agreed to a pre-trial diversion program in which Lipscomb would serve six months of probation. She must do 40 hours of community service with disabled children and complete anger management classes to avoid a conviction.
She is now director of education at the school.
Morrison pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 30 days in jail, 120 days on house arrest and five years of probation. She had to surrender her Arkansas occupational therapy license. And she agreed to not work with kids in any professional capacity during her probation.
Nobody seemed happy with Morrison’s punishment. But the prosecutor said the state decided the plea deal was the best option to make sure Morrison was held accountable. Under Arkansas law, the state would have to prove substantial physical harm to the victim in order to convict on a charge of permitting abuse to a minor, and juries can judge that differently, said Sonia Hagood, who prosecuted the case for the state. For instance, she said, a recent jury decided not to convict a defendant because the victim did not suffer serious physical injury.
As part of her deal, Morrison got to pick where she served her time — the Greene County Detention Center, which is newer than Craighead County’s jail and gave her a private cell. And she’s serving house arrest on her boyfriend’s Missouri ranch, where she can ride horses.
Advertisement
She passed the time while incarcerated on the phone and on video calls from a personal tablet. It’s standard for all communication from jail to be recorded, and ProPublica obtained more than 500 recordings. They show she was still involved with the administration of the school while jailed.
She spoke frequently to Sportsman about school finances, including telling her to make sure the EFA money still was coming in. Sportsman, who owns Delta Therapy Group, the occupational therapy practice that works with Delta Institute students, said that the jail conversations were “informal conversations between friends” and disputed the idea that Morrison was running the school while incarcerated.
Morrison chatted for hours with her new board members and school employees and gave them to-do lists. She asked how some kids were doing. In a call with the teacher who also entered a plea deal, she called the victim’s mother “evil” for going to the police.
She also spoke with a documentary filmmaker who is interested in the school’s story and plans to pitch a project to a big streamer, like Netflix or HBO. In one call with the documentarian, Morrison described the abuse she’d been jailed for as a “restorative” technique to try to help the children treat one another more respectfully.
Advertisement
Mary “Tracy” Morrison was jailed for permitting child abuse at her school, The Delta Institute for the Developing Brain. In a video call with documentary filmmaker Alysia Sofios from jail, Morrison explained her goal in conducting the “group discussion” with students.Obtained by ProPublica
“It was never about, like, ‘Go hit him,’ right?’’ she said. “And the concept is so sophisticated that it’s like, if the prosecuting attorney wanted to know my story, if the detective — they would’ve interviewed me. They would have couched it like, ‘Oh, this is an intervention of individuals who are high risk, who will end up in prison themselves if they behave this way.’ They didn’t do that.”
Both the prosecutor and detective tried to interview Morrison during the investigation but she refused to speak with them.
Morrison was released from jail June 1.
“I think she should be prevented from teaching anywhere in the United States of America and having children around if she’s going to try to influence them the way she did,” Bailey, the detective on the case, said. “If we can’t protect our kids, who can we protect?
The Latest Complaint
There’s nothing in state law that prevents Morrison from still owning Delta or another private school and benefiting from public funding.
Advertisement
Records still list Morrison’s family business as the owner of the Delta Institute property. State business records also show that she still is the registered agent for a private school at the same address. The school recently took a new name: North Star Academy.
Lipscomb said the school’s board changed the name “as part of the process of healing for our community of families and students that are here and still trying to make sense of the world as we know it now.” Lipscomb said Morrison has “zero involvement” with the school right now.
She said she expects as many as 35 students to attend this upcoming school year.
Renee Johns said Jacob has never recovered from his traumatic time at the Delta school. He has grown increasingly aggressive. He’s used martial arts moves that the school taught children in lieu of P.E. to punch holes in the wall of her home and lash out at her.
Her daughter, Addison, returned to public school. She loves her new school, but was so far behind that she needed to repeat third grade. “School is for helping, not for hurting,” the 10-year-old recently told a ProPublica reporter.
Advertisement
Johns said parents who chose Morrison’s school and went along with her methods were sold lies. “We honestly thought we were doing the best for our children.”
Renee Johns says she regrets sending her two children to Morrison’s school.Houston Cofield for ProPublica
The public keeps filing complaints about private and microschools with the Education Department. In late March it received a new request to investigate The Delta Institute for the Developing Brain. It came from a woman who had heard concerning reports from a family with a child at the school.
“Given the population served by this program, ensuring a safe, structured, and educationally appropriate environment is especially important. I would greatly appreciate your office’s attention to reviewing these concerns,” the woman wrote to the state’s hotline.
Lipscomb said she’s not aware of any active complaints. The state won’t comment on whether it’s investigating.
Have you had trouble finding a school or using a voucher-style program? Do you have concerns about schools — public or private — in your area? Help us understand how families across the country are navigating their school options.
Governor Sarah Sanders and the Arkansas Economic Development Commission announced more than $12.52 million in funding for Arkansas cities, counties, and communities.
Eight-eight (88) grants, totaling $12,522,736, were awarded during the latest grant cycle. The funding was provided through the General Assistance and Rural Services Block Grant set-asides of the State Small Cities Community Development Block Grant, and State Rural Community Grant programs.
“Arkansas’ success starts with our local communities,” said Governor Sanders. “The places that shape our towns and cities are often the ones that define them – a park, walking trail, community center, safer street. These funds help local leaders build those places that bring neighbors together, improve quality of life, and build on what Arkansans already know: there is no better place in America to live, work, and raise a family than the Natural State.”
State CDBG funds are utilized for a variety of public facility and infrastructure projects, including senior centers; childcare centers; public health facilities; youth centers; residential water and wastewater; street, curb, gutter, sidewalk, or storm sewer; and flood control and drainage projects; as well as towards economic development grants incentivizing the location or expansion of jobs in the state. Funds are awarded on an annual basis with counties and municipalities also allocating resources to meet urgent needs and to benefit low- and moderate-income persons.
Advertisement
The Rural Services Block Grant program funds new construction or renovation of community centers, fire stations, or multi-purpose buildings, as well as the purchase of fire trucks and fire equipment. Applicants from incorporated towns of less than 3,000 in population and unincorporated rural areas with low to moderate incomes of 51 percent or higher are eligible for up to $100,000 in funds under the program with a 10 percent match.
The Rural Community Grant Program is used to fund projects such as fire trucks, fire protection equipment, community centers, storm sirens, community parks, and walking trails. Applicants from incorporated towns of less than 3,000 in population and unincorporated rural areas are eligible for up to $15,000 in 50/50 matching funds under the program.
“The Division of Rural Services and the Rural Development Commission are proud to present recipients of the Rural Community Grant and the Rural Services Block Grant for fiscal year 2026,” said Becca Caldwell, director of AEDC’s Division of Rural Services. “These grant programs are essential for the development of rural Arkansas as they help communities improve their quality of life, address safety concerns, and improve infrastructure. The Division of Rural Services is committed to help set up our rural communities to thrive.”
View the full list of recipients and awards below:
Rural Community Grant Program Altus Fire Department $15,000.00
Advertisement
Atkins Volunteer Fire Department $15,000.00
Bradley Fire Department $15,000.00
Carlisle Fire Department $15,000.00
Cato Volunteer Fire Department $15,000.00
Charleston Fire Department $7,500.00
Advertisement
City Of Bay $15,000.00
City of Cedarville $5,094.29
City Of Cherry Valley $15,000.00
City Of Chidester $10,990.50
City Of Diamond City $15,000.00
Advertisement
City Of Hampton $15,000.00
City Of Harrisburg $15,000.00
City Of Hazen $15,000.00
City Of Hughes $8,012.32
City of McCrory $15,000.00
Advertisement
City Of Mulberry $15,000.00
City Of Ogden $7,401.95
City of Pangburn $15,000.00
City Of Sparkman $15,000.00
Community of Compton $1,500.00
Advertisement
Community of Rover $7,300.00
Cotter Volunteer Fire Department $15,000.00
Drew County $13,495.50
Enola Fire Department $6,111.52
Fouke Fire Department $15,000.00
Advertisement
Hackett Volunteer Fire Department $15,000.00
Hackett Volunteer Fire Department $15,000.00
Harmon Fire Department $15,000.00
Highfill Volunteer Fire Department $12,151.42
Imboden Fire Department $12,376.45
Advertisement
Izard County $15,000.00
Junction City Volunteer Fire Department $15,000.00
Lake City Fire Department $15,000.00
Landis Volunteer Fire Department $15,000.00
Lincoln Fire Department $15,000.00
Advertisement
Marshall Fire Department $15,000.00
Mineral Springs Fire Department $15,000.00
Mount Holly Volunteer Fire Department $12,705.00
Oakland Promise Land Fire Protection District $15,000.00
Poyen Fire Department $15,000.00
Advertisement
Prim Fire Department $5,203.00
Star City Fire Department $7,259.00
Strawberry Volunteer Fire Department $14,974.40
Town Of Bergman $15,000.00
Town Of Big Flat $15,000.00
Advertisement
Town Of Caulksville $15,000.00
Town Of Emerson $14,986.26
Town Of Guy $15,000.00
Town Of Letona $4,984.00
Town Of Oak Grove $15,000.00
Advertisement
Town Of Prattsville $9,345.00
Town Of Shirley $15,000.00
Town of St. Joe $7,488.24
Welcome Home Community $9,000.00
Woodlawn Volunteer Fire Department $6,758.75
Advertisement
Rural Services Block Grant Program Ashley County $89,999.74
This summer is shaping up to be one of the biggest boating celebrations of the decade. This year, tens of thousands of anglers, water skiers, kayakers and pleasure boaters will converge on Arkansas waters to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the Second Continental Congress’s formal adoption of the Declaration of Independence.
Arkansas Game and Fish Commission is asking everyone to boat responsibly and avoid situations that could ruin the celebration — namely, boating under the influence of alcohol or narcotics.
Sgt. Sydney Grant, Game and Fish boating law administrator, said Arkansas game wardens will be on the water to increase safety and reduce boating accidents that result from boating under the influence of alcohol or drugs.
Boating while intoxicated can be even more dangerous than driving a car while intoxicated, as most boaters have less experience operating a boat. Boats also don’t have brakes and are slower to maneuver than cars. These slower reaction times to a sudden danger can be the difference between life and death.
Advertisement
Grant adds that the effects of alcohol are magnified by the conditions that boating creates.
“Sun, heat, wind and wave action all intensify alcohol’s impact,” Grant said. “A person who normally wouldn’t feel much effect of one or two beers in an air-conditioned home may find themselves impaired by the same amount of alcohol on the water.”
Even passengers should pay attention to their consumption levels.
“Drinking too much can lead to a dangerous situation or poor decisions for anyone,” Grant said. “We’ve also caught many people who enjoyed a day on the water, but then got in a car for the ride home, still under the effect of alcohol. Practicing a little restraint during your boating day helps us make both the roadways and waterways of the state safer during this big family summer.
“If we didn’t have to give a single ticket this summer for intoxicated boating, I think every game warden in Arkansas would celebrate,” Grant said. “Our job is to make sure people can enjoy the water safely and come home with great stories from their trips. We’re not here to ruin the fun. We simply ask everyone to be responsible, avoid overindulging, and always make sure you have a sober boat operator and designated driver.”