Connect with us

Science

Secret Data, Tiny Islands and a Quest for Treasure on the Ocean Floor

Published

on

Secret Data, Tiny Islands and a Quest for Treasure on the Ocean Floor

KINGSTON, Jamaica — As demand grows globally for metals wanted to make batteries for electrical automobiles, one of many richest untapped sources of the uncooked supplies lies two and a half miles beneath the floor of the Pacific Ocean.

This distant part of the seabed, about 1,500 miles southwest of San Diego, might quickly develop into the world’s first industrial-scale mining website in worldwide waters.

The Metals Firm, based mostly in Vancouver, has secured unique entry to tons of seabed rocks full of cobalt, copper and nickel — sufficient, it says, to energy 280 million electrical automobiles, equal to all the fleet of automobiles in the USA.

The historic local weather laws that Congress handed this month, extending tax credit for patrons of electrical automobiles, will solely speed up the necessity for these supplies as automakers additionally push ahead with plans to part out manufacturing of gasoline-powered automobiles. The Metals Firm hopes to construct a plant in Texas to course of the seabed rocks and has been lobbying for federal help to take action.

“No mining has ever been executed on a scale like this on the planet,” mentioned James A.R. McFarlane, former head of environmental monitoring on the Worldwide Seabed Authority, an company affiliated with the United Nations that can regulate mining by the Metals Firm and the numerous different companies and nations anticipated to observe.

Advertisement

An examination by The New York Instances of how the Metals Firm is ready to use this new frontier within the inexperienced power revolution — the agency calculates it’s going to clear $31 billion in earnings over the 25-year lifetime of the challenge — tells the story of a single-minded, 15-year-long courtship of the small Jamaica-based seabed company that holds the keys to the world’s underwater treasures.

Interviews and lots of of pages of emails, letters and different inside paperwork present that the agency’s executives obtained key data from the Seabed Authority starting in 2007, giving a serious edge to their mining ambitions. The company offered knowledge figuring out a few of the most respected seabed tracts, after which put aside the prized websites for the corporate’s future use, in response to the supplies.

The sharing of that data has angered staff on the company, who mentioned a few of the knowledge was meant for creating nations attempting to compete with richer nations, one thing the company is remitted beneath worldwide legislation to help. “You’re violating the authorized idea behind the Seabed Authority,” Sandor Mulsow, who held prime positions on the company earlier than leaving in 2019, mentioned in an interview. “It’s scandalous.”

The Metals Firm is certainly one of almost two dozen contractors which have exploration offers with the company; a lot of the them are held by nations. However the agency has been particularly aggressive in pushing the Seabed Authority to permit it to start out mining, and is now racing to start in late 2024.

The endeavor has raised issues amongst environmentalists in regards to the perpetually underfunded company’s dedication to defending life on the ocean flooring, and has renewed broader questions on who will get to revenue from the riches of the ocean.

Advertisement

The Seabed Authority was established beneath the auspices of the United Nations properly earlier than local weather change set off a surge in demand for the metals. Although it has by no means gotten off the bottom, a unit of the company was charged with leveling the taking part in subject for creating nations, partly by reserving metal-rich tracts of the ocean flooring and serving to to mine them.

With jurisdiction over half the planet, the company’s 50 staff work out of workplaces right here in Jamaica’s capital on a small annual appropriation of $10 million.

The company has at occasions been at struggle with itself, interviews and paperwork present. Staff have complained in regards to the secretary common’s spending — on journey and a chauffeured luxurious automotive — and sounded alarms about moral shortcomings, together with a revolving door of consultants and workers attorneys who’ve labored for firms with issues earlier than the company.

At a gathering of the company’s governing physique final yr, a Metals Firm contractor was amongst a gaggle of businesspeople who roamed freely among the many worldwide delegates as they debated agenda objects, together with the agency’s request for the authority to log off on a plan to check mining tools. One of many prime rule-making our bodies on the Seabed Authority, its authorized and technical fee, is secretive, assembly behind closed doorways, and a few of its personal members additionally work for mining contractors, The Instances discovered.

The company’s relationship with the Metals Firm has turned the system on its head in different methods. Growing nations working with the Seabed Authority are speculated to get entry to knowledge in sure mining areas earlier than firms do. However the reverse occurred: A prime government on the agency bought the important knowledge first, then secured two tiny island nations as sponsors.

Advertisement

Even with these companions — the Pacific islands of Nauru and Tonga, which have a mixed inhabitants of 120,000 and are nowhere close to the mining zone — the agency has maintained almost full monetary management over the challenge, together with rights to all however a fraction of the anticipated earnings.

“This firm got down to sport the system and use a poor, creating Pacific nation because the conduit to use these assets,” mentioned Lord Fusitu’a, a former member of the Tonga parliament. He mentioned he was given lower than an hour in 2014 to overview laws the nation adopted to affix the hassle.

The governments of Nauru and Tonga, which declined requests for remark, have lobbied the company on behalf of the Metals Firm. In a letter, Nauru’s president, Lionel Aingimea, informed the company that the mining would assist safe a carbon-neutral future and financially profit his nation.

“Nauru is nobody’s puppet, I can guarantee you,” Gerard Barron, the Metals Firm’s chief government, mentioned in an interview.

A legislation agency retained by the Seabed Authority, sometimes called the I.S.A., rejected the notion that anybody on the company had acted inappropriately in sharing knowledge or partaking with contractors, and mentioned that every one journey and different bills by the secretary common have been absolutely licensed. The authorized and technical fee, the agency mentioned, “meets totally correctly” with its members and workouts independence in its selections.

Advertisement

“The I.S.A. has not, at any time, improperly or unlawfully shared confidential knowledge,” the agency, Withers Bergman, mentioned in an announcement to The Instances.

Michael Lodge, the British lawyer who has served as secretary common for almost six years, and was its authorized counsel when the info was shared starting in 2007, additionally defended the company’s actions. Round that point, he mentioned in an interview on the headquarters in December, it publicly launched summaries of some knowledge in an effort to attract consideration to the seabed’s riches and generate curiosity in mining, and it welcomed inquiries by potential companions.

Mr. Barron mentioned he was unaware that Nautilus Minerals had gotten entry to some mining knowledge earlier than forming partnerships with Nauru and Tonga. (He was an investor in Nautilus, the forerunner firm that obtained the knowledge, and later turned chief government of what’s now the Metals Firm in 2017, which bought sure Nautilus property.) Nonetheless, he acknowledged, the corporate had rights to what’s “typically thought to be a few of the finest areas on the market.” In a submitting final yr with the Securities and Change Fee, the corporate confirmed it had relied on knowledge twice offered by the company.

In March, Mr. Barron informed Wall Road traders that seabed mining had been made all of the extra pressing for the USA and its allies due to China’s rising dominance of the cobalt commerce and Russia’s position as a serious nickel provider.

Because it seeks approval to start operations, the agency has teamed up with Allseas, an offshore oil business contractor, Glencore, a mining big, and Maersk, one of many world’s largest delivery firms. The metals are present in potato-size rocks referred to as polymetallic nodules, and the agency would suck them up from the ocean flooring with a large underwater vacuum cleaner and transport them to shore.

Advertisement

The largest hurdle is the big job underway on the Seabed Authority to enact the world’s first environmental laws of deep-sea mining in worldwide waters — and a royalty system to gather revenues from contractors extracting the metals. The hassle has been within the works for years however lately accelerated after Nauru, one of many Metals Firm’s sponsors, invoked a provision successfully mandating that it wrap up by subsequent yr.

The plans to start mining by the Metals Firm and different contractors have generated fierce opposition from some environmental teams, which together with authorities leaders like President Emmanuel Macron of France have known as for a moratorium on mining till scientists can research the distant seabed and higher perceive the results of an industrial-scale operation.

“Now we have no clue what’s going to occur,” mentioned Stefan Bräger, a former Seabed Authority marine biologist who now serves as an adviser to the German authorities. “It’s like driving on the unsuitable facet of the highway at night time and turning off your headlights.”

Each Mr. Barron and Mr. Lodge mentioned in interviews that the criticism was unfounded. They mentioned the mining can be for the “advantage of mankind,” as required beneath the U.N. Conference on the Legislation of the Sea, which established the Seabed Authority, and so they predicted that it will trigger much less ecological harm than open-pit mining.

Mr. Lodge mocked his opponents, referring to environmentalist teams as propagandists.

Advertisement

“To say, ‘Don’t hurt the ocean’ — it’s the best message on the earth, proper? You simply have to point out a photograph of a turtle with a straw in its nostril,” he mentioned. “All people in Brooklyn can then say, ‘I don’t wish to hurt the ocean.’ However they positive need their Teslas.”

A miniature duplicate of the British Royal Navy’s H.M.S. Challenger sits close to Mr. Lodge’s workplace on the Seabed Authority headquarters. The famed ship set sail 150 years in the past on an expedition that mapped the ocean flooring.

A dredge on that voyage scraped “a number of peculiar black oval our bodies” out of the Pacific, the crew reported in 1873. The polymetallic nodules, sufficiently small to slot in the palm of a hand, had shaped over hundreds of thousands of years and contained excessive concentrations of helpful metals.

A century later, China, Japan, the Soviet Union, the USA and a few European nations started exploring a stretch of the ocean between Hawaii and Mexico, referred to as the Clarion-Clipperton Zone, that has an particularly giant quantity of the nodules.

With no mining guidelines in place, the U.N. intervened and adopted the Conference on the Legislation of the Sea, a treaty that went into impact in 1994 and now has been ratified by 167 nations and the European Union. The settlement established the Seabed Authority, granting it unique jurisdiction over mining in worldwide waters — these not beneath the territorial rule of particular person nations — and charging it with the creation of a regulatory system.

Advertisement

A delegate from Malta had laid out the mission years earlier throughout a 1967 speech on the U.N. The seabed needs to be used “for the unique advantage of mankind as an entire,” mentioned the delegate, Arvid Pardo, including that poorer nations ought to get “preferential consideration within the occasion of economic advantages” and that mining mustn’t trigger “critical impairment of the marine surroundings.”

America, beneath President Ronald Reagan, refused to ratify the treaty, insisting, amongst different issues, that it gave an excessive amount of authority to creating nations and put American companies at a drawback. However the nation agreed to behave typically in accordance with its provisions, which prolong to different actions like delivery, fishing and navigation.

As the principles stand, any nation can search permission to conduct surveys to establish mining websites, and China, France, India and South Korea, amongst different richer nations, have executed simply that. Once they discover worthy areas, they need to hand over half of them to the Seabed Authority, which units them apart as “reserved areas” the place much less developed nations can provoke their very own tasks.

The authority has allotted roughly 200,000 sq. miles of seabed — bigger then the scale of California — to creating nations to do exploratory work within the reserved areas, with almost half of that area now beneath the management of the Metals Firm.

Beginning 20 years in the past, the Seabed Authority started protecting monitor of the reserved areas with the best focus of nodules, based mostly on nations’ proprietary surveys. A number of the knowledge was used for a modeling challenge that charted the geology of the ocean flooring, and its potential for mining, although the general public model of that challenge aggregated the info and didn’t disclose something proprietary.

Advertisement

Because the company clarified in a public assertion in 2000, detailed pattern station knowledge was to not be shared exterior the group. “Knowledge and knowledge ‘of business worth’ given to the authority by a seabed contractor shall be thought-about confidential,” it mentioned.

Across the similar time, executives at Nautilus Minerals have been keenly within the reserved areas and turned to the Seabed Authority for assist in deciding the place to focus their consideration, the paperwork present.

Company officers held a sequence of conferences in New York and Jamaica with David Heydon, a geologist who later turned Nautilus’s chief government, and his son Robert, who additionally labored there, to debate seabed mining.

Neither Mr. Heydon nor his son, who’s now an government on the Metals Firm, responded to requests for remark. An organization spokesman additionally didn’t reply to questions on them.

In a single assembly in 2007, emails and different paperwork present, the company’s secretary common on the time, Satya N. Nandan, shared company information in regards to the reserved areas with the corporate.

Advertisement

“Thanks for internet hosting Scott Trebilcock and Robert Heydon in Kingston final month, and offering Nautilus Minerals Inc. (‘Nautilus’) with the chance to overview knowledge pertaining to the I.S.A.’s Reserved Areas,” David Heydon wrote in a 2007 letter to Mr. Nandan. Mr. Nandan died in 2020.

Mr. Heydon went on to ask that three of the 4 most promising areas within the reserved areas be put aside for Nautilus whereas it sought a nation to sponsor its mining ambitions. “Nautilus seems to be ahead to submitting its full software to the I.S.A. early subsequent yr as soon as State Sponsorship has been obtained,” he wrote.

Nauru, one of many world’s smallest nations, rapidly emerged as a number one candidate for the Heydons, who’re from Australia, which beforehand turned to the island to deal with its refugees and to mine a mineral utilized in fertilizer. The nation, with simply 11,000 folks, had solely a tiny environmental company. It additionally didn’t demand a lot in change for sponsorship, having no means of its personal to pursue such an endeavor.

Mr. Barron, the Metals Firm chief government, wouldn’t say how a lot cash Nauru was on faucet to obtain. A neighborhood chief in Tonga, one other island companion, mentioned in an interview that the corporate had agreed to pay it $2 per ton as a “mining manufacturing charge.” That cost would quantity to lower than half of 1 p.c of the agency’s whole estimated worth of the mined materials. The Metals Firm wouldn’t verify this charge.

Individually, the Metals Firm would pay an undetermined royalty charge to the Seabed Authority as soon as business mining started.

Advertisement

The corporate, a merger of DeepGreen and the Sustainable Alternatives Acquisition Company, was based in 2021 and markets itself as a publicly traded start-up that views “the local weather disaster as the largest problem of our time.” Its singular focus is harvesting polymetallic nodules, which it describes because the cleanest supply of battery-grade metals on the planet — in shorthand, batteries in a rock.

“It’s simply Mom Nature’s reward to us,” Mr. Barron, who was paid $14.2 million in wage and inventory choices final yr, mentioned as he relaxed on a ship that had simply returned to San Diego from an exploratory expedition.

The knowledge given to Nautilus, in response to an electronic mail written by Robert Heydon, included an “Excel spreadsheet equipped by the authority that exhibits the grade and abundance recorded at particular pattern stations.”

Comply with-up correspondence from Mr. Heydon and others made clear that they knew they shouldn’t be given sure knowledge till they’d a contract to companion with a creating nation. However Nautilus requested extra data to hurry issues alongside.

“As you’ll remember it takes fairly just a few months to place collectively a big scale exploration marketing campaign,” Mr. Heydon wrote in 2011 to Mr. Lodge, then the company’s authorized counsel.

Advertisement

In his draft reply, Mr. Lodge famous that the Seabed Authority was topic to “sure restrictions on the disclosure of such knowledge to anybody exterior to the authority.” However in a separate electronic mail to colleagues, he instructed there was a path that might permit them to accommodate Mr. Heydon: the general public launch of summaries of survey knowledge.

Because it had made the summaries public, he reasoned, the company might share at the very least a few of the knowledge Mr. Heydon had requested.

In one other electronic mail, an company worker acknowledged that a few of the knowledge offered to Nautilus was speculated to have been “labeled,” at the very least earlier than the corporate secured a contract to do exploratory work within the reserved areas.

“Right here is all the reserved space knowledge,” Vijay Kodagali, a senior scientific officer, now deceased, wrote in 2012 after a Nautilus guide requested for an additional copy of the info offered earlier. “That is speculated to be labeled knowledge and to not be disclosed to others.”

Three former senior workers members on the company and a present member of the Seabed Authority Council, the company’s governing physique, mentioned in interviews that they believed the info sharing in some instances violated company guidelines. There was no suggestion that the Metals Firm acted improperly in requesting the knowledge.

Advertisement

“There have been occasions that you just have been simply informed to sit down down, shut up and do what you’re informed,” mentioned Mr. McFarlane, who resigned from his put up because the authority’s prime environmental official in August 2011, a number of months after questions in regards to the knowledge sharing emerged.

In its assertion, Withers Bergman mentioned that the Seabed Authority workers routinely interacted with contractors pursuing mining websites, however reiterated that the company had at all times honored knowledge confidentiality guidelines.

“It isn’t uncommon and is totally correct and regular follow for the I.S.A. secretariat to interact with contractors to debate proposals which these contractors have relating to potential functions,” the assertion mentioned, “together with — as within the case of Nautilus — the contractor offering a confidential indication of the areas into consideration.”

Even with the prized data in hand, the Metals Firm has confronted issues amongst some company officers that it’s dominating a useful resource not supposed for rich nations or worldwide mining firms with nominal companions.

The Metals Firm has rights to 3 of the seven exploratory contracts issued by the Seabed Authority in areas reserved for creating nations.

Advertisement

The foundations require that the sponsoring nations, on this case Nauru and Tonga, train “efficient management” over the mining tasks so they aren’t companions in title solely. The Metals Firm has met this requirement, partly, by organising nonprofit foundations to supervise operations, however they’re managed by the corporate, which has only one everlasting worker on every island, in response to securities filings. Operations are as an alternative run from Australia, Canada and the USA.

The Metals Firm secured entry to a 3rd reserved space in 2015, sponsored by the central Pacific island of Kiribati.

“These venture-capital-backed firms can odor the desperation in these small island economies,” mentioned Maureen Penjueli, coordinator of the Fiji-based Pacific Community on Globalization, a nonprofit that promotes the rights of Pacific island nations.

Nii Allotey Odunton, a mining engineer from Ghana who served because the Seabed Authority’s secretary common from 2009 to 2016, mentioned that creating nations have been left with no selection however to work intently with non-public contractors, significantly as a result of the unit inside the company meant to facilitate mining was by no means created.

“The one practical choice for many creating states due to this fact was to kind partnerships with business pursuits which have entry to the monetary capital and expertise essential to conduct deep-sea exploration,” Mr. Odunton mentioned in a speech on the U.N. in 2011. (He died this yr.)

Advertisement

Mr. Barron mentioned the preparations have been good for the islands. “Should you take a look at a nation like Nauru, and for those who ask them, ‘Properly, what are your different financial growth alternatives?’ there’s not a protracted record,” he mentioned.

Squire Jeremiah, a member of Nauru’s parliament in 2015 when laws was permitted associated to the Metals Firm, mentioned the agency’s presence within the nation was nominal. “They’ve thus far funded just a few scholarships and small tasks, attempting to purchase their means in to get us on board,” he mentioned. “Nevertheless it has not amounted to a lot.”

A spokesman for the corporate mentioned it donated a complete of $140,600 final yr to help neighborhood and social packages in Nauru and Tonga. The spokesman added that the contracts left the islands in “efficient management” as a result of their environmental businesses have regulatory oversight.

Klaas Willaert, a world maritime lawyer who has served as a Belgian delegate to the Seabed Authority, denounced the preparations.

“They’re counting on a authorized loophole right here,” Mr. Willaert mentioned. “They’ve chosen tiny islands to achieve entry to the reserved areas. It’s precisely the other of what the legislation of the ocean supposed.”

Advertisement

Chris G. Brown spent a number of years serving to draft mining laws as an worker and guide on the company. He now works as a guide to Nauru, the Metals Firm companion.

Charles Morgan, an environmental scientist, was retained by the authority to review knowledge collected by early explorers of the proposed mining areas. Later, he was employed by a agency whose property are actually managed by the Metals Firm to safe a chunk of that knowledge for enterprise functions.

Nathan Eastwood, a mining business lawyer at London-based Clifford Probability, took a sabbatical from his legislation agency final yr to assist the Seabed Authority draft mining laws whilst he continued to solicit future seabed-mining shoppers for his agency, the I.S.A. paperwork and different information present. He didn’t reply to requests for remark.

In interviews, some workers members mentioned that shut business ties permeated the company and contributed to a toxic work surroundings. Inner emails and surveys additionally doc the discontent.

“The present tradition/organizational dynamics have resulted in frustration, resentment, and made the office an disagreeable (and sometimes poisonous) place to be,” mentioned an electronic mail in 2018 that was based mostly on a survey of 31 workers members.

Advertisement

“Breakdowns in communication, lack of transparency, worry of retaliation, not feeling valued, nepotism, clashing personalities, inconsistent software of insurance policies, and sometimes uncertainty round course and imaginative and prescient (amongst different issues) have contributed to the present state,” it mentioned.

A survey in 2019 reached the “disheartening” conclusion that “many, if not all, of the problems and frustrations you confronted a yr in the past are nonetheless current as we speak.”

Staff mentioned they’d no method to search redress. “There is no such thing as a inside hotline,” Andrew Webster, then a senior government serving to oversee the company’s finances, wrote in an electronic mail in 2019. “No whistleblower hotline.”

Within the assertion to The Instances, the legislation agency for the authority mentioned that “steady efforts are being made to make sure the constant software of insurance policies throughout the group.” Since Mr. Lodge took over the company in 2017, the assertion mentioned, he has revamped personnel guidelines, “efficiently and radically enhancing the working lives and the morale of the I.S.A.’s valued and devoted staff.”

Mr. Lodge has been a flash level for some. Staff cited the acquisition final yr of an Audi SUV to drive him round Kingston although he had warned months earlier that finances cuts have been prone to “severely affect the Authority’s means to hold out its operations.”

Advertisement

He additionally expensed airfare and associated payments totaling as a lot as $50,000 per journey for him and his household to journey on holidays during the last decade as a part of licensed house leaves to areas in Asia, in response to an company doc.

Within the assertion, the legislation agency mentioned that Mr. Lodge’s agency-funded journey and the acquisition of the brand new company automotive had all been correctly permitted and have been “absolutely in keeping with U.N. requirements.”

“The unbiased auditors study all expenditures and are required to report any instances of fraud, wasteful or improper expenditure, or expenditure in breach of the principles,” the assertion mentioned, “and no such expenditure has ever been reported.”

Some present and former staff mentioned the office dysfunction signaled an lack of ability to meet the company’s core mission of benefiting “the widespread heritage of mankind.”

“The group merely doesn’t have the capability essential to carry out such features,” Van Khanh Nguyen, a finance officer between 2018 and 2020, mentioned in an interview, throughout which she detailed a sequence of economic misdeeds she mentioned she noticed whereas on the company. She was amongst a number of former staff who lately filed a personnel complaints with the U.N. “What they care about is their very own profit, and corruption is in every single place.”

Advertisement

Scientists say that extra is thought in regards to the floor of the moon than in regards to the flooring of the ocean, with a lot of it nonetheless unmapped, and estimate that maybe 90 p.c of the species on the backside of the Pacific stay unclassified.

Worries about that data hole emerged publicly final yr when the Metals Firm submitted plans to check a brand new mining machine.

The corporate had teamed up with Allseas, the offshore oil contractor, to equip a former drill ship with a tool resembling a bulldozer that vacuums up nodules. The machine has been examined within the North Sea, however the Metals Firm needs a separate trial within the Clarion-Clipperton Zone so it will probably show what, it predicts, can be restricted penalties for aquatic life because it collects about 3,600 tons of nodules. Finally, as soon as business mining begins, it intends to extract 1.3 million tons of those rocks a yr at its first website.

The Metals Firm has pushed forward with its plans whilst the corporate has proven indicators of economic challenges, with its inventory worth falling from a excessive of $15.39 final yr to a low of 81 cents on Friday.

The corporate’s request remains to be beneath overview, having elicited sharp criticism around the globe, together with from the governments of Britain and Germany, and from some scientists who as soon as held prime posts on the Seabed Authority.

Advertisement

These questions echo bigger issues in regards to the hurt some scientists worry large-scale seabed mining could trigger. Probably the most distinguished opponent could also be Craig Smith, an oceanographer and former mining business contractor now on the College of Hawaii at Manoa. He spent almost 5 years at sea and in Antarctica finding out marine life, and his analysis has singled out the Clarion-Clipperton Zone as one thing value preserving.

“It’s simply not potential to do that with out basically destroying one of many largest wilderness areas left,” mentioned Dr. Smith, citing the potential affect of 17 totally different mining tasks within the space, together with the three contracts held by the Metals Firm. Dr. Smith was employed to judge the environmental results of seabed mining by the South Korean authorities and Lockheed Martin, the American contractor, that are contemplating tasks of their very own.

“These are a few of the most pristine, biodiverse habitats on a planet the place we have already got a biodiversity disaster due to destruction on land,” he mentioned.

Mr. McFarlane, the previous head of environmental monitoring on the Seabed Authority, instructed that the Metals Firm was deliberately taking part in down the risk.

“I’ve listened to his greenwashing,” Mr. McFarlane mentioned of Mr. Barron, the chief government. “This man is slick, however he’s like lots of people who see greenback indicators of their eyes.”

Advertisement

Mr. Barron mentioned that such criticism was off base and that his challenge was extraordinarily vital to the longer term well being of the planet: “This could possibly be a kind of tasks that would actually make a distinction — that would actually transfer the needle.”

His firm’s most fast request is for approval to check its new nodule collector. After pushback from governments and environmental teams about its proposal, the corporate supplemented its submitting with the Seabed Authority with further environmental knowledge.

“Choosing up the nodules from the seabed must be achieved with the utmost effectivity and minimal disturbance,” Jon Machin, a former offshore-drilling government who now serves as the corporate’s head of engineering, mentioned at a briefing in June.

The hassle, in response to the corporate, would come with a steady environmental monitoring system that might permit the crew to redirect the mining if sediment plumes or different hurt happens.

In an interview, Mr. Lodge lashed out on the scientists voicing issues, suggesting there was a “very incestuous” monetary relationship between them and the environmental activist teams.

Advertisement

“Should you spend your entire life finding out the worms that stay on nodules, then you definately get very connected to that,” Mr. Lodge mentioned. “And I’m undecided that they actually see the woods for the timber. The broader situation is: The place are you going to get these minerals from?”

The Seabed Authority, nonetheless, has taken important steps to restrict hurt, together with setting apart about 40 p.c of the Clarion-Clipperton Zone, 760,000 sq. miles, as areas the place mining won’t be allowed.

On the assembly of the authority’s governing council in December, proponents and opponents of the Metals Firm’s plans reached a compromise to hurry up the overview of the great seabed mining guidelines, sticking with the agency’s proposed timeline to start out business operations as early as 2024.

“Consensus implies that all people is barely sad,” Mr. Lodge informed the council.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Science

Prominent USC scientist goes on leave amid research misconduct allegations

Published

on

Prominent USC scientist goes on leave amid research misconduct allegations

A prominent neuroscientist at USC is on leave nearly a year after allegations of research misconduct cast doubt on his published work and derailed trials for an experimental stroke treatment.

USC Keck School of Medicine Dean Carolyn Meltzer sent an email to faculty in the department of physiology and neuroscience on Oct. 22, disclosing that professor Berislav V. Zlokovic was on leave “for an indefinite period.”

In the email, Meltzer said that professor Steve Kay would serve as acting director of both the Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute and the department of physiology and neuroscience, positions that Zlokovic formerly held.

A spokesperson confirmed Zlokovic’s leave and Kay’s acting appointments on Monday but declined to provide further details, citing confidentiality surrounding personnel matters. Zlokovic didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment Monday.

Late last year, a group of whistleblowers submitted a report to the National Institutes of Health questioning the integrity of Zlokovic’s research and the safety of an experimental stroke treatment developed by ZZ Biotech, the company he co-founded.

Advertisement

The report identified allegedly doctored images and data in 35 research papers in which Zlokovic was the sole common author. It also questioned findings in the Phase II clinical trials of 3K3A-APC, a drug intended to reduce post-stroke brain bleeds.

The whistleblowers’ findings and news of Zlokovic’s leave were first reported in the journal Science.

On Sept. 26, Houston-based ZZ Biotech officially canceled 3K3A-APC’s clinical trial, according to a notice of withdrawal filed on the government’s database of clinical research studies.

“Any decisions on the future development pathway of 3K3A-APC in stroke will need to wait until the investigations of Dr. Zlokovic are complete,” ZZ Biotech Chief Executive Kent Pryor said Monday. Zlokovic no longer has any managerial or scientific affiliation with the company but remains a minority equity holder as co-founder, Pryor said.

NIH paused the trial in November 2023. It also launched an investigation into Zlokovic and instructed USC to return $1.9 million in funding already supplied for the study, Science reported.

Advertisement

A spokesperson for USC didn’t immediately respond to questions about the university’s obligations to return any federal money related to the study.

Zlokovic is a leading researcher on the blood-brain barrier, with particular interest in its role in stroke and dementia. After joining the USC faculty in 1989, he left and spent 11 years at the University of Rochester before returning to USC in 2011. He was appointed director of USC’s Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute the following year.

He retained his department chair and institute director titles as USC launched an investigation after the whistleblower report.

Since the allegations became public, three of Zlokovic’s hundreds of published research papers have been retracted. Eight more have been issued corrections or expressions of concern, a note journals append to articles when they believe there may be a problem with a paper but have not proved so.

Dr. Matthew Schrag, an assistant professor of neurology at Vanderbilt who co-authored the whistleblower report independently of his work at the university, previously told The Times that he and his colleagues did not find evidence of manipulated data in the drug trial. But given the degree of concern surrounding Zlokovic’s earlier work, he said, a clinical trial relying on his research to treat patients in life-threatening situations deserved further scrutiny.

Advertisement

“When you’re seeing a red flag or a trend in the clinical trial, I would tend to give that more weight in the setting of serious ethical concerns around the pre-clinical data,” Schrag said earlier this year. Schrag didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment Monday.

Continue Reading

Science

Is this “slow” strength training method the fountain of youth? L.A.'s 90-year-olds say yes

Published

on

Is this “slow” strength training method the fountain of youth? L.A.'s 90-year-olds say yes

DeLoyce Alcorn is 92 years old — and pressing nearly four times that in weight at the gym.

On a recent Wednesday afternoon, Alcorn — dressed in a T-Shirt that read “Be Strong. Be Resilient. Be You.” — slid into the leg press machine, which was set at a whopping 312 pounds. He gripped the handlebars, closed his eyes and “got zen,” as he says. Then he pressed his legs forward very slowly.

“Slower, slower, smoooooth ….” urged his his trainer, standing by his side.

The retired aerospace engineer, who lives in Sierra Madre, did about four reps before his teeth clenched, his legs trembled and he let out short puffs of air through pursed lips. The exercise was just one minute and thirty-three seconds long. When it was over, Alcorn sprung to his feet, beaming triumphantly.

“I used to do 400 pounds!” he boasted. “But the COVID, it put me back. I’m working my way back.”

Advertisement

Alcorn was in the midst of his weekly workout at the Strength Shoppe in Echo Park, where he and his wife, Patricia Alcorn, 88, have been training for 12 years. They’re devotees of an exercise called slow-motion strength training. Often referred to as SuperSlow or Power of Ten, the resistance training technique involves lifting weights very slowly and methodically, with 10 seconds each spent on the lifting and lowering motions of the exercise. Doing so eliminates momentum and is therefore easier on the joints and connective tissue — one reason many fans of slo-mo training are in their golden years.

Patricia Alcorn, 88, works out with her trainer, Melinda Hughes, at the Strength Shoppe.

(Marcus Ubungen/Los Angeles Times)

The workout is typically done using MedX equipment, weight machines that were developed in the 1980s for rehabilitative purposes. They’re still used in physical therapy clinics, hospitals and gyms around the country.

Advertisement

Recently, strength training has become a hot topic in the world of exercise, in part because research continues to show its benefits for health and longevity. It builds muscle strength and bone density and is good for cardio metabolic health, especially for women. But slow-motion strength training, in particular, is beneficial for older exercisers, people healing injuries or those who are new to or returning to exercise because the slow cadence and focus on form — always with one-on-one supervision — reduces the chance of injury.

The method has also caught the attention of the wider exercise community because of its efficiency: a slow-motion workout is just 20 minutes long, once a week. It shouldn’t be done more than that, so the body has time to recover, says Melinda Hughes, co-owner of the Strength Shoppe. Slowing down the movement, eliminating momentum and not stopping to rest during an exercise set puts the muscle under greater tension for a longer period of time, forcing it to work harder, so exercisers may see greater benefit in less time compared with traditional strength training. Muscles typically fatigue from the exercise in just one to two minutes.

“Whereas traditional strength training takes three times the amount of time, with more reps and sets,” Hughes says, “and you don’t get to the level of intensity that you do with slow-motion strength training, where you just do one set to failure.”

Lai-San Ho on the rowing torso machine at the Workout Revolution with trainer Lorena Ortiz.

Lai-San Ho on the rowing torso machine at the Workout Revolution with trainer Lorena Ortiz.

(The Workout Revolution )

Advertisement

“It’s only 20 minutes. I can go on my lunch break!” says Lai-San Ho, a 33-year-old TV editor. She started slow-motion strength training at the Workout Revolution in Studio City after tearing her ACL in 2022 — it provided a low-impact way to exercise while recovering. But she stuck with it to stay fit.

“I could tell I was getting stronger in all areas of my body,” Ho says. “I’ve noticed certain aches and pains in my upper back, after a year, went away. I can’t imagine not doing it because I feel so many benefits.”

Jason Zaremski, a sports medicine physician at the University of Florida, says the technique is “legit, the real thing.”

“Any weight training is great for older individuals, but this routine reduces risk of injury while still gaining benefit,” he says. “There’s no jerky motions or throwing of weights. And it can increase your circulation — you get greater blood flow while activating your muscles. So you’re adding a cardiovascular benefit for something that’s typically anaerobic.”

Even so, other experts are skeptical about the technique.

Advertisement

“Sets going to failure, with a long time under tension, is a very uncomfortable, unnecessarily painful workout,” Casey Johnston, author of the weightlifting newsletter “She’s a Beast,” said. “It’s not necessarily more effective. So much of lifting is about coordination, neuromuscular activity in your body and stabilization and that’s not present using machines the way it is with free weights.”

A 92-year-old man and his trainer working out on the leg press machine.

DeLoyce Alcorn and his trainer, Arjen van Eijmeren, at the leg press machine.

(Marcus Ubungen/Los Angeles Times)

There are about a dozen boutique fitness studios in L.A. that specialize in slow-motion strength training, as well as larger chains like the Perfect Workout. Though many of them have been around for decades, momentum around this subset of exercise picked up during the COVID-19 pandemic, Hughes says, adding that by 2022, the Strength Shoppe had doubled its staff at both its Pasadena and Echo Park locations and this month opened a Mid-City location. While gyms and fitness studios closed during early stay-at-home orders, many slow-motion strength training studios remained open because they offered an essential rehabilitative service: weight-bearing physical therapy for pain management, osteoporosis and other conditions.

Word got out. Then, after restrictions lifted, those looking for in-person studios with strong COVID protections found their way to slow-motion strength training. The environment of a typical studio is quieter and more intimate than a bustling gym. No more than two clients and their trainers are typically allowed in the space at once. The temperature is set at a chilly 68-70 degrees, because body heat rises with such strenuous exertion. There are typically no group classes offered and no music over the loudspeakers.

Advertisement

“It’s so absolute attention can be paid to form and alignment,” Hughes says, adding that her clientele ranges from age 12 to 93. “I, and other trainers who work with this, call it ‘the fountain of youth.’ We lose muscle and bone density as we age. It’s cumulative. When you gain — or regain muscle mass — you feel younger, your body is more supported.”

Melinda Hughes and Arjen van Eijmeren, owners of the Strength Shoppe.

Melinda Hughes and Arjen van Eijmeren, owners of the Strength Shoppe.

(Marcus Ubungen/Los Angeles Times)

At SuperSlowLA in Brentwood, which opened 25 years ago, the clientele ranges from age 15 to 89. But the studio specializes in the health of postmenopausal women, who make up 80% of its business (90% of its clients are female).

“Women get osteoporosis and osteopenia and other related health issues because of hormonal changes,” says owner Benjamin Fisher. “A lot of our clients are afraid of walking down the street and breaking a hip. The methodology of what we do, we keep bone loss at bay. We give them the strength to be more active and independent.”

Advertisement

Leona Katz, an 80-year-old attorney who has been training at SuperSlowLA for five years, calls the results “miraculous.”

“I was very overweight and had hip problems and blood pressure problems,” Katz says. “After my husband passed away, I made some life changes and lost more than 100 pounds. My kids call me Leona 2.0.”

At Myogenics Fitness, which opened in West Hollywood in 1998, the atmosphere is clean, simple and functional. Occasionally the studio will play white noise to help exercisers focus. Trainers coach clients on how to keep their breathing open and fluid while they lift.

“A lot of people compare it to mediating,” owner Chad Morris says of the workout.

A man, 96, lifts weights on a machine at Myogenics Fitness.

Marty Waldman, 96, performs pull-downs at Myogenics Fitness.

(Carlin Stiehl/For The Times)

Advertisement

Marty Waldman, 96, has been training at Myogenics for about six years, which has been “very gratifying but also exhausting” as a nonagenarian, he says. He was a runner, skier and long-distance biker when he was younger, and is in relatively good shape today but for a heart condition and “two bad knees and shoulders.” But the retired businessman began slo-mo strength training because he wanted to feel stronger.

“It’s allowed me to do things I wouldn’t ordinarily do,” he says. “We just got back from a rigorous trip with the gorillas in Rwanda — there’s no way I could have done that if I hadn’t been in reasonably decent shape.”

A stopwatch in a hand at the gym.

Chad Morris, owner of Myogenics Fitness, holds a stopwatch while training Marty Waldman, 96.

(Carlin Stiehl/For The Times)

Advertisement

Though slow-motion strength training has delivered clear results for many of its participants, those results come with a price: Sessions must be done with a trainer and typically cost between $80 and $100, so that a month’s worth of sessions are more than a monthly gym membership.

There are safety precautions too.

Marty Waldman's progress is recorded on his workout chart at Myogenics Fitness.

Marty Waldman’s progress is recorded on his workout chart at Myogenics Fitness.

(Carlin Stiehl/For The Times)

“You can’t do the same amount of weight that you’d do with a traditional routine,” says sports medicine physician Zaremski. “You may have to drop the weight because your muscles will fatigue quicker — they’re under tension for a longer period. Your form also needs to be especially accurate.”

Advertisement

Still, devotees say the cost is worth it.

“You cannot put a price on health,” says Blake Boyd, a 58-year-old actor-producer and former fitness trainer who came to the Strength Shoppe six years ago after having been diagnosed with arthritis in his neck. “It’s effective, it works. I’ll do it for the rest of my life.”

Rick Staddon, owner of Vitality Personal Training in Calabasas, says his clients comment that getting stronger has been a game-changer.

“I often hear: ‘I can carry groceries up the stairs now,’ ‘I can cut the grass,’ he says. “The simple things are very meaningful for a lot of people.”

An 80-year-old woman lifts weights at the gym.

Alanna Kathleen Brown lifts weights at Pure Strength in Studio City.

(Deborah Vankin/Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

For Alanna Kathleen Brown, an 80-year-old retired English professor, slow-motion strength training has turned her into a “walking miracle,” she says, climbing onto the seat of the High Row machine at Pure Strength in Studio City.

“I have osteoarthritis, I deal with obesity, I have blood pressure issues and GERD,” Brown says. “But I do weights. I’m strong. I’ve avoided surgeries.”

Then she lifts and lowers the weight very slowly until her cheeks are flushed pink.

“For me, doing slow weights is right up there with paying all the bills,” she says. “I’d give up a lot of things before I’d give this up. Because it’s quality of life — and independence.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Science

Opinion: Too many older Americans are getting tested for Alzheimer's

Published

on

Opinion: Too many older Americans are getting tested for Alzheimer's

An 80-something patient came in for an annual visit recently and was worried that recent memory lapses might be symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease. This patient, like several others in my practice, has taken cognitive tests annually for more than a decade.

With each passing year, I see and hear the patient’s spiral of worry: Am I getting more forgetful? Perhaps it feels like “Where are my keys?” and “Where did I leave my wallet?” have become common refrains. These are simple memory lapses, an experience most people have throughout their lives, but they can be troubling as we get older. Are they signs of Alzheimer’s? Or signs of that other dreadful A-word … aging?

Year after year, for 10 years, in fact, this patient’s cognitive tests had come back normal. Until this year, when a blood test was positive for biomarkers for Alzheimer’s — triggering a further sense of panic. But here’s the problem: Science can’t yet tell us whether a positive test means the patient has an early stage of the disease. The only new data point was that this patient, so long dreading this day, had positive biomarkers showing increased risk for the disease. This person may not develop full-blown Alzheimer’s for five years or 20 years or ever. So did running that test have any benefit?

There is a sense of urgency in the medical community to classify a positive biomarker test as “Stage One Alzheimer’s Disease.” This is part of a larger desire to appear aggressive in fighting the disease, which for so long had no tests and no course of treatment.

I get that, and I understand why so many older patients fear Alzheimer’s, but I disagree with doctors whose response is to test early and often — and to diagnose Stage One Alzheimer’s based solely on biomarkers.

Advertisement

That categorization is potentially dangerous to patients, an unnecessary source of middle-of-the-night stress that can be deeply damaging to the very quality of life this person seeks to retain.

Such worries have become more widespread recently as the biomarker blood tests, marketed by companies like Quest and Labcorp, became commercially available so that patients could pay for them out of pocket. Previously, they were only used by clinicians in studies.

There’s an understandable impulse behind the medical community’s push to test lots of people. The more the disease is diagnosed, the more individuals will be identified for future treatments, and there is no doubt we need to improve recognition of early dementia, especially in medically underserved populations.

At the same time, pharmaceutical companies need more clinical trials — and also more patients — to develop new drugs to add to the array that already exists, such as Leqembi. In an aging nation with 7 million people already diagnosed with Alzheimer’s, we need these drugs, badly, but there’s no denying that profit lurks in the background as a motive here as well.

Although there are good reasons to test lots of people and gather a larger pool of patients who might have early stage Alzheimer’s, I think the cost to specific individuals can be just too great.

Advertisement

Candidates for clinical trials should not be identified based on positive blood tests from a clinical setting, but rather through carefully conducted research studies that have proper counseling and disclosure protocols.

More than 40% of individuals over 80 who take a biomarker test for Alzheimer’s will test positive. And it’s natural that many of them then will fixate on the worst-case scenarios and live their lives with a sense of worry and dread.

Patients who’ve tested positive come to me and bluntly state, “I have Alzheimer’s.” I see the scared look on their faces. Reaching this conclusion based on the biomarkers is like diagnosing cancer without doing a biopsy. The danger is real: Half of the patients who actually do have Alzheimer’s experience some sort of depression, and so do quite a few who think they have it — or worry they are sure to get it.

A positive blood biomarker test could also lead to significant mental and financial damage, with unnecessary and expensive procedures like an MRI, a PET scan or a spinal fluid test. Some people don’t like to hear this, but in many cases simple lifestyle changes like exercise, more rest and healthier eating could improve cognitive function. This is the recommendation I make to all my patients regardless of their Alzheimer’s risk.

For now, the biomarker test should be taken only if you are truly showing signs of Alzheimer’s disease. Here are some ways to tell: If a loved one is experiencing noticeable changes from their baseline mental abilities — such as losing track of time and place or struggling to find words — that can be a sign. Personality changes and new mood symptoms are other warning signs. Still, these symptoms should be distinguished from the slow and steady decline we will all experience.

Advertisement

If you do have symptoms, then yes, it could be time for biomarker tests, but only after thorough cognitive testing and a complete review of your medical history. That medical history could show other conditions such as sleep apnea that can influence memory. Lifestyle changes or treatments of those other conditions could resolve the troubling symptoms.

My stance on widespread testing will be different when doctors have more tools available to predict and treat Alzheimer’s and can offer constructive advice after a blood test comes back positive.

When someone has a cancerous tumor, surgeons remove it as soon as possible and start a treatment plan. When someone tests positive for the gene that indicates risk for a certain type of cancer, we monitor carefully.

A positive Alzheimer’s biomarker test, on the other hand, leads to no changes in clinical management when there are no cognitive symptoms. Prevention trials and improved predictive biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease will change that, but we’re not there yet.

In the meantime, doctors’ oath to “do no harm” should mean we avoid overdiagnosing Alzheimer’s and fueling needless anxiety.

Advertisement

Keith Vossel is a professor of neurology at UCLA.

Continue Reading

Trending