Connect with us

Science

Secret Data, Tiny Islands and a Quest for Treasure on the Ocean Floor

Published

on

Secret Data, Tiny Islands and a Quest for Treasure on the Ocean Floor

KINGSTON, Jamaica — As demand grows globally for metals wanted to make batteries for electrical automobiles, one of many richest untapped sources of the uncooked supplies lies two and a half miles beneath the floor of the Pacific Ocean.

This distant part of the seabed, about 1,500 miles southwest of San Diego, might quickly develop into the world’s first industrial-scale mining website in worldwide waters.

The Metals Firm, based mostly in Vancouver, has secured unique entry to tons of seabed rocks full of cobalt, copper and nickel — sufficient, it says, to energy 280 million electrical automobiles, equal to all the fleet of automobiles in the USA.

The historic local weather laws that Congress handed this month, extending tax credit for patrons of electrical automobiles, will solely speed up the necessity for these supplies as automakers additionally push ahead with plans to part out manufacturing of gasoline-powered automobiles. The Metals Firm hopes to construct a plant in Texas to course of the seabed rocks and has been lobbying for federal help to take action.

“No mining has ever been executed on a scale like this on the planet,” mentioned James A.R. McFarlane, former head of environmental monitoring on the Worldwide Seabed Authority, an company affiliated with the United Nations that can regulate mining by the Metals Firm and the numerous different companies and nations anticipated to observe.

Advertisement

An examination by The New York Instances of how the Metals Firm is ready to use this new frontier within the inexperienced power revolution — the agency calculates it’s going to clear $31 billion in earnings over the 25-year lifetime of the challenge — tells the story of a single-minded, 15-year-long courtship of the small Jamaica-based seabed company that holds the keys to the world’s underwater treasures.

Interviews and lots of of pages of emails, letters and different inside paperwork present that the agency’s executives obtained key data from the Seabed Authority starting in 2007, giving a serious edge to their mining ambitions. The company offered knowledge figuring out a few of the most respected seabed tracts, after which put aside the prized websites for the corporate’s future use, in response to the supplies.

The sharing of that data has angered staff on the company, who mentioned a few of the knowledge was meant for creating nations attempting to compete with richer nations, one thing the company is remitted beneath worldwide legislation to help. “You’re violating the authorized idea behind the Seabed Authority,” Sandor Mulsow, who held prime positions on the company earlier than leaving in 2019, mentioned in an interview. “It’s scandalous.”

The Metals Firm is certainly one of almost two dozen contractors which have exploration offers with the company; a lot of the them are held by nations. However the agency has been particularly aggressive in pushing the Seabed Authority to permit it to start out mining, and is now racing to start in late 2024.

The endeavor has raised issues amongst environmentalists in regards to the perpetually underfunded company’s dedication to defending life on the ocean flooring, and has renewed broader questions on who will get to revenue from the riches of the ocean.

Advertisement

The Seabed Authority was established beneath the auspices of the United Nations properly earlier than local weather change set off a surge in demand for the metals. Although it has by no means gotten off the bottom, a unit of the company was charged with leveling the taking part in subject for creating nations, partly by reserving metal-rich tracts of the ocean flooring and serving to to mine them.

With jurisdiction over half the planet, the company’s 50 staff work out of workplaces right here in Jamaica’s capital on a small annual appropriation of $10 million.

The company has at occasions been at struggle with itself, interviews and paperwork present. Staff have complained in regards to the secretary common’s spending — on journey and a chauffeured luxurious automotive — and sounded alarms about moral shortcomings, together with a revolving door of consultants and workers attorneys who’ve labored for firms with issues earlier than the company.

At a gathering of the company’s governing physique final yr, a Metals Firm contractor was amongst a gaggle of businesspeople who roamed freely among the many worldwide delegates as they debated agenda objects, together with the agency’s request for the authority to log off on a plan to check mining tools. One of many prime rule-making our bodies on the Seabed Authority, its authorized and technical fee, is secretive, assembly behind closed doorways, and a few of its personal members additionally work for mining contractors, The Instances discovered.

The company’s relationship with the Metals Firm has turned the system on its head in different methods. Growing nations working with the Seabed Authority are speculated to get entry to knowledge in sure mining areas earlier than firms do. However the reverse occurred: A prime government on the agency bought the important knowledge first, then secured two tiny island nations as sponsors.

Advertisement

Even with these companions — the Pacific islands of Nauru and Tonga, which have a mixed inhabitants of 120,000 and are nowhere close to the mining zone — the agency has maintained almost full monetary management over the challenge, together with rights to all however a fraction of the anticipated earnings.

“This firm got down to sport the system and use a poor, creating Pacific nation because the conduit to use these assets,” mentioned Lord Fusitu’a, a former member of the Tonga parliament. He mentioned he was given lower than an hour in 2014 to overview laws the nation adopted to affix the hassle.

The governments of Nauru and Tonga, which declined requests for remark, have lobbied the company on behalf of the Metals Firm. In a letter, Nauru’s president, Lionel Aingimea, informed the company that the mining would assist safe a carbon-neutral future and financially profit his nation.

“Nauru is nobody’s puppet, I can guarantee you,” Gerard Barron, the Metals Firm’s chief government, mentioned in an interview.

A legislation agency retained by the Seabed Authority, sometimes called the I.S.A., rejected the notion that anybody on the company had acted inappropriately in sharing knowledge or partaking with contractors, and mentioned that every one journey and different bills by the secretary common have been absolutely licensed. The authorized and technical fee, the agency mentioned, “meets totally correctly” with its members and workouts independence in its selections.

Advertisement

“The I.S.A. has not, at any time, improperly or unlawfully shared confidential knowledge,” the agency, Withers Bergman, mentioned in an announcement to The Instances.

Michael Lodge, the British lawyer who has served as secretary common for almost six years, and was its authorized counsel when the info was shared starting in 2007, additionally defended the company’s actions. Round that point, he mentioned in an interview on the headquarters in December, it publicly launched summaries of some knowledge in an effort to attract consideration to the seabed’s riches and generate curiosity in mining, and it welcomed inquiries by potential companions.

Mr. Barron mentioned he was unaware that Nautilus Minerals had gotten entry to some mining knowledge earlier than forming partnerships with Nauru and Tonga. (He was an investor in Nautilus, the forerunner firm that obtained the knowledge, and later turned chief government of what’s now the Metals Firm in 2017, which bought sure Nautilus property.) Nonetheless, he acknowledged, the corporate had rights to what’s “typically thought to be a few of the finest areas on the market.” In a submitting final yr with the Securities and Change Fee, the corporate confirmed it had relied on knowledge twice offered by the company.

In March, Mr. Barron informed Wall Road traders that seabed mining had been made all of the extra pressing for the USA and its allies due to China’s rising dominance of the cobalt commerce and Russia’s position as a serious nickel provider.

Because it seeks approval to start operations, the agency has teamed up with Allseas, an offshore oil business contractor, Glencore, a mining big, and Maersk, one of many world’s largest delivery firms. The metals are present in potato-size rocks referred to as polymetallic nodules, and the agency would suck them up from the ocean flooring with a large underwater vacuum cleaner and transport them to shore.

Advertisement

The largest hurdle is the big job underway on the Seabed Authority to enact the world’s first environmental laws of deep-sea mining in worldwide waters — and a royalty system to gather revenues from contractors extracting the metals. The hassle has been within the works for years however lately accelerated after Nauru, one of many Metals Firm’s sponsors, invoked a provision successfully mandating that it wrap up by subsequent yr.

The plans to start mining by the Metals Firm and different contractors have generated fierce opposition from some environmental teams, which together with authorities leaders like President Emmanuel Macron of France have known as for a moratorium on mining till scientists can research the distant seabed and higher perceive the results of an industrial-scale operation.

“Now we have no clue what’s going to occur,” mentioned Stefan Bräger, a former Seabed Authority marine biologist who now serves as an adviser to the German authorities. “It’s like driving on the unsuitable facet of the highway at night time and turning off your headlights.”

Each Mr. Barron and Mr. Lodge mentioned in interviews that the criticism was unfounded. They mentioned the mining can be for the “advantage of mankind,” as required beneath the U.N. Conference on the Legislation of the Sea, which established the Seabed Authority, and so they predicted that it will trigger much less ecological harm than open-pit mining.

Mr. Lodge mocked his opponents, referring to environmentalist teams as propagandists.

Advertisement

“To say, ‘Don’t hurt the ocean’ — it’s the best message on the earth, proper? You simply have to point out a photograph of a turtle with a straw in its nostril,” he mentioned. “All people in Brooklyn can then say, ‘I don’t wish to hurt the ocean.’ However they positive need their Teslas.”

A miniature duplicate of the British Royal Navy’s H.M.S. Challenger sits close to Mr. Lodge’s workplace on the Seabed Authority headquarters. The famed ship set sail 150 years in the past on an expedition that mapped the ocean flooring.

A dredge on that voyage scraped “a number of peculiar black oval our bodies” out of the Pacific, the crew reported in 1873. The polymetallic nodules, sufficiently small to slot in the palm of a hand, had shaped over hundreds of thousands of years and contained excessive concentrations of helpful metals.

A century later, China, Japan, the Soviet Union, the USA and a few European nations started exploring a stretch of the ocean between Hawaii and Mexico, referred to as the Clarion-Clipperton Zone, that has an particularly giant quantity of the nodules.

With no mining guidelines in place, the U.N. intervened and adopted the Conference on the Legislation of the Sea, a treaty that went into impact in 1994 and now has been ratified by 167 nations and the European Union. The settlement established the Seabed Authority, granting it unique jurisdiction over mining in worldwide waters — these not beneath the territorial rule of particular person nations — and charging it with the creation of a regulatory system.

Advertisement

A delegate from Malta had laid out the mission years earlier throughout a 1967 speech on the U.N. The seabed needs to be used “for the unique advantage of mankind as an entire,” mentioned the delegate, Arvid Pardo, including that poorer nations ought to get “preferential consideration within the occasion of economic advantages” and that mining mustn’t trigger “critical impairment of the marine surroundings.”

America, beneath President Ronald Reagan, refused to ratify the treaty, insisting, amongst different issues, that it gave an excessive amount of authority to creating nations and put American companies at a drawback. However the nation agreed to behave typically in accordance with its provisions, which prolong to different actions like delivery, fishing and navigation.

As the principles stand, any nation can search permission to conduct surveys to establish mining websites, and China, France, India and South Korea, amongst different richer nations, have executed simply that. Once they discover worthy areas, they need to hand over half of them to the Seabed Authority, which units them apart as “reserved areas” the place much less developed nations can provoke their very own tasks.

The authority has allotted roughly 200,000 sq. miles of seabed — bigger then the scale of California — to creating nations to do exploratory work within the reserved areas, with almost half of that area now beneath the management of the Metals Firm.

Beginning 20 years in the past, the Seabed Authority started protecting monitor of the reserved areas with the best focus of nodules, based mostly on nations’ proprietary surveys. A number of the knowledge was used for a modeling challenge that charted the geology of the ocean flooring, and its potential for mining, although the general public model of that challenge aggregated the info and didn’t disclose something proprietary.

Advertisement

Because the company clarified in a public assertion in 2000, detailed pattern station knowledge was to not be shared exterior the group. “Knowledge and knowledge ‘of business worth’ given to the authority by a seabed contractor shall be thought-about confidential,” it mentioned.

Across the similar time, executives at Nautilus Minerals have been keenly within the reserved areas and turned to the Seabed Authority for assist in deciding the place to focus their consideration, the paperwork present.

Company officers held a sequence of conferences in New York and Jamaica with David Heydon, a geologist who later turned Nautilus’s chief government, and his son Robert, who additionally labored there, to debate seabed mining.

Neither Mr. Heydon nor his son, who’s now an government on the Metals Firm, responded to requests for remark. An organization spokesman additionally didn’t reply to questions on them.

In a single assembly in 2007, emails and different paperwork present, the company’s secretary common on the time, Satya N. Nandan, shared company information in regards to the reserved areas with the corporate.

Advertisement

“Thanks for internet hosting Scott Trebilcock and Robert Heydon in Kingston final month, and offering Nautilus Minerals Inc. (‘Nautilus’) with the chance to overview knowledge pertaining to the I.S.A.’s Reserved Areas,” David Heydon wrote in a 2007 letter to Mr. Nandan. Mr. Nandan died in 2020.

Mr. Heydon went on to ask that three of the 4 most promising areas within the reserved areas be put aside for Nautilus whereas it sought a nation to sponsor its mining ambitions. “Nautilus seems to be ahead to submitting its full software to the I.S.A. early subsequent yr as soon as State Sponsorship has been obtained,” he wrote.

Nauru, one of many world’s smallest nations, rapidly emerged as a number one candidate for the Heydons, who’re from Australia, which beforehand turned to the island to deal with its refugees and to mine a mineral utilized in fertilizer. The nation, with simply 11,000 folks, had solely a tiny environmental company. It additionally didn’t demand a lot in change for sponsorship, having no means of its personal to pursue such an endeavor.

Mr. Barron, the Metals Firm chief government, wouldn’t say how a lot cash Nauru was on faucet to obtain. A neighborhood chief in Tonga, one other island companion, mentioned in an interview that the corporate had agreed to pay it $2 per ton as a “mining manufacturing charge.” That cost would quantity to lower than half of 1 p.c of the agency’s whole estimated worth of the mined materials. The Metals Firm wouldn’t verify this charge.

Individually, the Metals Firm would pay an undetermined royalty charge to the Seabed Authority as soon as business mining started.

Advertisement

The corporate, a merger of DeepGreen and the Sustainable Alternatives Acquisition Company, was based in 2021 and markets itself as a publicly traded start-up that views “the local weather disaster as the largest problem of our time.” Its singular focus is harvesting polymetallic nodules, which it describes because the cleanest supply of battery-grade metals on the planet — in shorthand, batteries in a rock.

“It’s simply Mom Nature’s reward to us,” Mr. Barron, who was paid $14.2 million in wage and inventory choices final yr, mentioned as he relaxed on a ship that had simply returned to San Diego from an exploratory expedition.

The knowledge given to Nautilus, in response to an electronic mail written by Robert Heydon, included an “Excel spreadsheet equipped by the authority that exhibits the grade and abundance recorded at particular pattern stations.”

Comply with-up correspondence from Mr. Heydon and others made clear that they knew they shouldn’t be given sure knowledge till they’d a contract to companion with a creating nation. However Nautilus requested extra data to hurry issues alongside.

“As you’ll remember it takes fairly just a few months to place collectively a big scale exploration marketing campaign,” Mr. Heydon wrote in 2011 to Mr. Lodge, then the company’s authorized counsel.

Advertisement

In his draft reply, Mr. Lodge famous that the Seabed Authority was topic to “sure restrictions on the disclosure of such knowledge to anybody exterior to the authority.” However in a separate electronic mail to colleagues, he instructed there was a path that might permit them to accommodate Mr. Heydon: the general public launch of summaries of survey knowledge.

Because it had made the summaries public, he reasoned, the company might share at the very least a few of the knowledge Mr. Heydon had requested.

In one other electronic mail, an company worker acknowledged that a few of the knowledge offered to Nautilus was speculated to have been “labeled,” at the very least earlier than the corporate secured a contract to do exploratory work within the reserved areas.

“Right here is all the reserved space knowledge,” Vijay Kodagali, a senior scientific officer, now deceased, wrote in 2012 after a Nautilus guide requested for an additional copy of the info offered earlier. “That is speculated to be labeled knowledge and to not be disclosed to others.”

Three former senior workers members on the company and a present member of the Seabed Authority Council, the company’s governing physique, mentioned in interviews that they believed the info sharing in some instances violated company guidelines. There was no suggestion that the Metals Firm acted improperly in requesting the knowledge.

Advertisement

“There have been occasions that you just have been simply informed to sit down down, shut up and do what you’re informed,” mentioned Mr. McFarlane, who resigned from his put up because the authority’s prime environmental official in August 2011, a number of months after questions in regards to the knowledge sharing emerged.

In its assertion, Withers Bergman mentioned that the Seabed Authority workers routinely interacted with contractors pursuing mining websites, however reiterated that the company had at all times honored knowledge confidentiality guidelines.

“It isn’t uncommon and is totally correct and regular follow for the I.S.A. secretariat to interact with contractors to debate proposals which these contractors have relating to potential functions,” the assertion mentioned, “together with — as within the case of Nautilus — the contractor offering a confidential indication of the areas into consideration.”

Even with the prized data in hand, the Metals Firm has confronted issues amongst some company officers that it’s dominating a useful resource not supposed for rich nations or worldwide mining firms with nominal companions.

The Metals Firm has rights to 3 of the seven exploratory contracts issued by the Seabed Authority in areas reserved for creating nations.

Advertisement

The foundations require that the sponsoring nations, on this case Nauru and Tonga, train “efficient management” over the mining tasks so they aren’t companions in title solely. The Metals Firm has met this requirement, partly, by organising nonprofit foundations to supervise operations, however they’re managed by the corporate, which has only one everlasting worker on every island, in response to securities filings. Operations are as an alternative run from Australia, Canada and the USA.

The Metals Firm secured entry to a 3rd reserved space in 2015, sponsored by the central Pacific island of Kiribati.

“These venture-capital-backed firms can odor the desperation in these small island economies,” mentioned Maureen Penjueli, coordinator of the Fiji-based Pacific Community on Globalization, a nonprofit that promotes the rights of Pacific island nations.

Nii Allotey Odunton, a mining engineer from Ghana who served because the Seabed Authority’s secretary common from 2009 to 2016, mentioned that creating nations have been left with no selection however to work intently with non-public contractors, significantly as a result of the unit inside the company meant to facilitate mining was by no means created.

“The one practical choice for many creating states due to this fact was to kind partnerships with business pursuits which have entry to the monetary capital and expertise essential to conduct deep-sea exploration,” Mr. Odunton mentioned in a speech on the U.N. in 2011. (He died this yr.)

Advertisement

Mr. Barron mentioned the preparations have been good for the islands. “Should you take a look at a nation like Nauru, and for those who ask them, ‘Properly, what are your different financial growth alternatives?’ there’s not a protracted record,” he mentioned.

Squire Jeremiah, a member of Nauru’s parliament in 2015 when laws was permitted associated to the Metals Firm, mentioned the agency’s presence within the nation was nominal. “They’ve thus far funded just a few scholarships and small tasks, attempting to purchase their means in to get us on board,” he mentioned. “Nevertheless it has not amounted to a lot.”

A spokesman for the corporate mentioned it donated a complete of $140,600 final yr to help neighborhood and social packages in Nauru and Tonga. The spokesman added that the contracts left the islands in “efficient management” as a result of their environmental businesses have regulatory oversight.

Klaas Willaert, a world maritime lawyer who has served as a Belgian delegate to the Seabed Authority, denounced the preparations.

“They’re counting on a authorized loophole right here,” Mr. Willaert mentioned. “They’ve chosen tiny islands to achieve entry to the reserved areas. It’s precisely the other of what the legislation of the ocean supposed.”

Advertisement

Chris G. Brown spent a number of years serving to draft mining laws as an worker and guide on the company. He now works as a guide to Nauru, the Metals Firm companion.

Charles Morgan, an environmental scientist, was retained by the authority to review knowledge collected by early explorers of the proposed mining areas. Later, he was employed by a agency whose property are actually managed by the Metals Firm to safe a chunk of that knowledge for enterprise functions.

Nathan Eastwood, a mining business lawyer at London-based Clifford Probability, took a sabbatical from his legislation agency final yr to assist the Seabed Authority draft mining laws whilst he continued to solicit future seabed-mining shoppers for his agency, the I.S.A. paperwork and different information present. He didn’t reply to requests for remark.

In interviews, some workers members mentioned that shut business ties permeated the company and contributed to a toxic work surroundings. Inner emails and surveys additionally doc the discontent.

“The present tradition/organizational dynamics have resulted in frustration, resentment, and made the office an disagreeable (and sometimes poisonous) place to be,” mentioned an electronic mail in 2018 that was based mostly on a survey of 31 workers members.

Advertisement

“Breakdowns in communication, lack of transparency, worry of retaliation, not feeling valued, nepotism, clashing personalities, inconsistent software of insurance policies, and sometimes uncertainty round course and imaginative and prescient (amongst different issues) have contributed to the present state,” it mentioned.

A survey in 2019 reached the “disheartening” conclusion that “many, if not all, of the problems and frustrations you confronted a yr in the past are nonetheless current as we speak.”

Staff mentioned they’d no method to search redress. “There is no such thing as a inside hotline,” Andrew Webster, then a senior government serving to oversee the company’s finances, wrote in an electronic mail in 2019. “No whistleblower hotline.”

Within the assertion to The Instances, the legislation agency for the authority mentioned that “steady efforts are being made to make sure the constant software of insurance policies throughout the group.” Since Mr. Lodge took over the company in 2017, the assertion mentioned, he has revamped personnel guidelines, “efficiently and radically enhancing the working lives and the morale of the I.S.A.’s valued and devoted staff.”

Mr. Lodge has been a flash level for some. Staff cited the acquisition final yr of an Audi SUV to drive him round Kingston although he had warned months earlier that finances cuts have been prone to “severely affect the Authority’s means to hold out its operations.”

Advertisement

He additionally expensed airfare and associated payments totaling as a lot as $50,000 per journey for him and his household to journey on holidays during the last decade as a part of licensed house leaves to areas in Asia, in response to an company doc.

Within the assertion, the legislation agency mentioned that Mr. Lodge’s agency-funded journey and the acquisition of the brand new company automotive had all been correctly permitted and have been “absolutely in keeping with U.N. requirements.”

“The unbiased auditors study all expenditures and are required to report any instances of fraud, wasteful or improper expenditure, or expenditure in breach of the principles,” the assertion mentioned, “and no such expenditure has ever been reported.”

Some present and former staff mentioned the office dysfunction signaled an lack of ability to meet the company’s core mission of benefiting “the widespread heritage of mankind.”

“The group merely doesn’t have the capability essential to carry out such features,” Van Khanh Nguyen, a finance officer between 2018 and 2020, mentioned in an interview, throughout which she detailed a sequence of economic misdeeds she mentioned she noticed whereas on the company. She was amongst a number of former staff who lately filed a personnel complaints with the U.N. “What they care about is their very own profit, and corruption is in every single place.”

Advertisement

Scientists say that extra is thought in regards to the floor of the moon than in regards to the flooring of the ocean, with a lot of it nonetheless unmapped, and estimate that maybe 90 p.c of the species on the backside of the Pacific stay unclassified.

Worries about that data hole emerged publicly final yr when the Metals Firm submitted plans to check a brand new mining machine.

The corporate had teamed up with Allseas, the offshore oil contractor, to equip a former drill ship with a tool resembling a bulldozer that vacuums up nodules. The machine has been examined within the North Sea, however the Metals Firm needs a separate trial within the Clarion-Clipperton Zone so it will probably show what, it predicts, can be restricted penalties for aquatic life because it collects about 3,600 tons of nodules. Finally, as soon as business mining begins, it intends to extract 1.3 million tons of those rocks a yr at its first website.

The Metals Firm has pushed forward with its plans whilst the corporate has proven indicators of economic challenges, with its inventory worth falling from a excessive of $15.39 final yr to a low of 81 cents on Friday.

The corporate’s request remains to be beneath overview, having elicited sharp criticism around the globe, together with from the governments of Britain and Germany, and from some scientists who as soon as held prime posts on the Seabed Authority.

Advertisement

These questions echo bigger issues in regards to the hurt some scientists worry large-scale seabed mining could trigger. Probably the most distinguished opponent could also be Craig Smith, an oceanographer and former mining business contractor now on the College of Hawaii at Manoa. He spent almost 5 years at sea and in Antarctica finding out marine life, and his analysis has singled out the Clarion-Clipperton Zone as one thing value preserving.

“It’s simply not potential to do that with out basically destroying one of many largest wilderness areas left,” mentioned Dr. Smith, citing the potential affect of 17 totally different mining tasks within the space, together with the three contracts held by the Metals Firm. Dr. Smith was employed to judge the environmental results of seabed mining by the South Korean authorities and Lockheed Martin, the American contractor, that are contemplating tasks of their very own.

“These are a few of the most pristine, biodiverse habitats on a planet the place we have already got a biodiversity disaster due to destruction on land,” he mentioned.

Mr. McFarlane, the previous head of environmental monitoring on the Seabed Authority, instructed that the Metals Firm was deliberately taking part in down the risk.

“I’ve listened to his greenwashing,” Mr. McFarlane mentioned of Mr. Barron, the chief government. “This man is slick, however he’s like lots of people who see greenback indicators of their eyes.”

Advertisement

Mr. Barron mentioned that such criticism was off base and that his challenge was extraordinarily vital to the longer term well being of the planet: “This could possibly be a kind of tasks that would actually make a distinction — that would actually transfer the needle.”

His firm’s most fast request is for approval to check its new nodule collector. After pushback from governments and environmental teams about its proposal, the corporate supplemented its submitting with the Seabed Authority with further environmental knowledge.

“Choosing up the nodules from the seabed must be achieved with the utmost effectivity and minimal disturbance,” Jon Machin, a former offshore-drilling government who now serves as the corporate’s head of engineering, mentioned at a briefing in June.

The hassle, in response to the corporate, would come with a steady environmental monitoring system that might permit the crew to redirect the mining if sediment plumes or different hurt happens.

In an interview, Mr. Lodge lashed out on the scientists voicing issues, suggesting there was a “very incestuous” monetary relationship between them and the environmental activist teams.

Advertisement

“Should you spend your entire life finding out the worms that stay on nodules, then you definately get very connected to that,” Mr. Lodge mentioned. “And I’m undecided that they actually see the woods for the timber. The broader situation is: The place are you going to get these minerals from?”

The Seabed Authority, nonetheless, has taken important steps to restrict hurt, together with setting apart about 40 p.c of the Clarion-Clipperton Zone, 760,000 sq. miles, as areas the place mining won’t be allowed.

On the assembly of the authority’s governing council in December, proponents and opponents of the Metals Firm’s plans reached a compromise to hurry up the overview of the great seabed mining guidelines, sticking with the agency’s proposed timeline to start out business operations as early as 2024.

“Consensus implies that all people is barely sad,” Mr. Lodge informed the council.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Science

Are 'deaths of despair' really more common for white Americans? A UCLA report says no

Published

on

Are 'deaths of despair' really more common for white Americans? A UCLA report says no

Nakeya Fields has seen how the stresses that come with being Black — racial injustice, financial strain, social isolation — can leave people feeling hopeless and push some into substance abuse.

It’s one of the reasons the Pasadena social worker started offering “therapeutic play” gatherings for Black mothers like herself and children.

“I’m trying to host more safe spaces for us to come and share that we’re suffering,” the 32-year-old said. “And honestly, the adults need play more than kids.”

Yet while Black and brown mental health practitioners such as Fields have labored to address these issues within their communities, a very different conversation has been occurring in the nation at large.

For years, discussions about America’s substance-abuse crisis have focused almost exclusively on the narrative that it is white, middle-age adults who face the greatest risk of dying from drug overdoses, alcoholic liver disease and suicide.

Advertisement

The theory, which was presented by two Princeton economists in 2015 and based on data from 1999 to 2013, argued that despair was behind rising premature mortality rates among white Americans, especially those who were less educated.

Virtually overnight, the “deaths of despair” concept began to drive the national discourse over populist far-right politics; the rise of Donald Trump; and deepening political polarization over such topics as addiction treatment, law enforcement and immigration.

But after roughly a decade, researchers at UCLA and elsewhere have begun to dismantle this idea.

In a study published recently in the journal JAMA Psychiatry, authors found that deaths of despair rates for middle-age Black and Native Americans have surged past those of white Americans as the overdose crisis moves from being driven by prescription opioids to illegal drugs such as fentanyl and heroin.

While the opioid crisis did raise drug overdose deaths among white Americans for a time, it was an anomaly, said Joseph Friedman, a social medicine expert at UCLA’s David Geffen School of Medicine who was the lead author of the journal analysis. In fact, by 2022 the rate for white Americans had started to dip.

Advertisement

“What’s really important is that now, with these three causes of death, the gap has closed, and it’s moving in the other direction,” Friedman said.

Sandra Mims, a community health worker with Community Health Project L.A., puts out boxes of Narcan — a naloxone nasal spray that reverses the effects of opioid overdose — at an event at MacArthur Park in Los Angeles on International Overdose Awareness Day.

(Mel Melcon / Los Angeles Times)

The analysis found that deaths of despair for Black Americans hit a rate of 103.81 per 100,000 people in 2022, compared with 102.63 for white Americans. The rate for Native American and Alaska Native populations was even higher at 241.7 per 100,000 people in 2022.

Advertisement

The UCLA analysis doesn’t specify the midlife personal issues that might have led to addiction or suicide.

But the authors say that flaws in the methodology of the 2015 deaths of despair report skewed its conclusions about who was most at risk. Specifically, Friedman said that it failed to give enough consideration to long-standing racial inequities that Black Americans experience in income, educational attainment, incarceration and access to quality medical care, all of which can contribute to drug use and poor mental health outcomes. And statistics for Native Americans weren’t factored in at all.

“It was burned into the American psyche that it was white people in the rural U.S.,” Friedman said. “It was just a very small piece of the truth that was very interesting but was widely sold as something it wasn’t.”

Another recent worrying sign, Friedman says: Deaths of despair among Latinos are starting to catch up to those among Black and Native Americans.

Princeton professors Anne Case and her husband Angus Deaton, winner of the 2015 Nobel Prize in economic sciences, were thrust into the media spotlight when their deaths of despair findings were first published. Deaton told NPR that during a visit to the White House, even President Obama asked him about the phenomenon.

Advertisement

Their 2020 book, “Deaths of Despair and the Future of Capitalism,” was described by publisher Princeton University Press as “a troubling portrait of the American dream in decline.”

“For the white working class, today’s America has become a land of broken families and few prospects. As the college educated become healthier and wealthier, adults without a degree are literally dying from pain and despair,” the publisher said.

Fields, who employs yoga and pottery in her therapy, said this framing was misleading and racially biased.

“I’m actually flabbergasted that somebody has a term called ‘deaths of despair,’” Fields said. “It’s ‘despair’ when white people experience this suffering. But when we experience it, it’s just what we have to deal with.”

Nakeya Fields

Nakeya Fields says it’s important to address mental wellness issues early, before people reach a crisis point and become another statistic.

(Jason Armond / Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

Both Friedman and Fields say their critiques are not intended to minimize deaths among white Americans.

Still, Friedman wonders: “How do we empower Black and Native American communities in a way that enables them to treat these problems?”

Racism must be considered when trying to make sense of the crisis in premature deaths, says Dr. Helena Hansen, head of UCLA’s Department of Psychiatry and a senior author on Friedman’s analysis. Hansen, who is Black and specializes in addiction psychiatry, also co-authored the book “Whiteout: How Racial Capitalism Changed the Color of Opioids in America.”

For years, pharmaceutical companies steered expensive prescription pain medications, such as the opioid Oxycontin, as well as the most effective medications for opioid-use disorder, to white Americans with good access to healthcare, she said.

Advertisement

But at the same time, Black and brown Americans were unfairly subjected to law enforcement policies that prioritized incarceration for illegal drug use over increasing access to more humane medical strategies to help them, further harming already vulnerable communities, Hansen said.

“In our society, people with access to the new technologies and pharmaceuticals are more likely to be white,” Hansen says. “None of this is by accident. All of this is the direct result of careful racially and class-segmented marketing strategies by pharmaceutical companies.”

This two-tiered system arose because drug manufacturers, doctors and policymakers have for too long failed to see people from historically marginalized communities who live with addiction and mental health crises as worthy of the same sympathy and treatments that many white Americans receive, Hansen says.

Joseph Gone, a professor of anthropology at Harvard who has spent 25 years studying the intersection of colonialism, culture and mental health in Indigenous communities, agreed.

“Deaths of despair have been a reality for Indigenous communities since conquest and dispossession,” he said.

Advertisement

“It’s amazing how much grief our people contend with from early deaths — there are not that many communities in America that bear it quite the way we do,” said Gone, who is a member of the Aaniiih-Gros Ventre tribal nation of north-central Montana. “Until we acknowledge and take responsibility for the casualties of colonization, which endure to this day through deaths of despair, it’s going to be very hard to turn this around.”

Gone, who has collaborated with Friedman on previous research, says the mental health crisis in tribal nations is aggravated by widespread joblessness and generational poverty, and a lack of healthcare resources to treat people in need of immediate or long-term treatment.

Just one traveling psychiatrist serves reservations spread across both Montana and Wyoming — a region covering more than 243,300 square miles — mostly to manage patients’ prescriptions, he says.

And “for all of Indian country, we’re talking about a very small number of in-patient psychiatric facilities,” Gone says.

General practitioners can serve as a first line of defense, but they are not necessarily equipped to address the ongoing life crises that can lead to excessive drug and alcohol use, Gone says.

Advertisement

Fields says it’s important to address mental wellness issues early, before people reach a crisis point and become another statistic.

While her focus remains on Black women, she’s developed additional programming for adults, families and children, such as developmental screenings that measure for high stress levels. In June, Fields will co-present “Rap 4 Peace,” a conference and gala featuring hip-hop artists talking about mental health and reducing gun violence.

“This ‘tragedy of despair’ lives in us,” Fields says. “We breathe it. We go outside hoping that nobody will harm us or our children because they feel threatened by us. This is truly harmful to our bodies.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Science

SpaceX plans to launch 90 rockets from Vandenberg Space Force Base by 2026. Could that harm the coast?

Published

on

SpaceX plans to launch 90 rockets from Vandenberg Space Force Base by 2026. Could that harm the coast?

SpaceX plans to launch 90 rockets into space from a Santa Barbara County military base by 2026, tripling the number of blasts rocking the coastal community — and raising concerns from neighbors and environmental groups about the effects on marine life.

Founded by billionaire Elon Musk, SpaceX has ramped up the number of rocket launches from Vandenberg Space Force Base in recent years, and it has made clear its desire to increase the frequency of blastoffs. But during a California Coastal Commission hearing Friday, U.S. Space Force officials outlined for the first time its own plans to multiply the number of launches from the base, from 37 in 2023 to more than 120 a year by 2026.

The overwhelming majority of those rocket liftoffs would be conducted by SpaceX, which has already done more launches from the base than the commission has approved.

Last year SpaceX breached an agreement with the commission that limited the number of launches to six, sending 28 rockets into space.

Advertisement

It is seeking an agreement with the commission to do 36 launches a year, increasing to 90 in 2026.

The decision by the commission, which was created to protect the state’s coastal resources, will directly affect residents and marine life near the military base that hear and feel the rockets’ sonic booms.

It could also redirect the future of SpaceX, whose pursuit to redefine space exploration is already closely tied with U.S. military interests, given its work as a military contractor.

“The ultimate goal is for this to be more routine and not a huge deal,” said Space Force Col. Bryan Titus, operations vice commander at the base.

Formed in 2019, the U.S. Space Force has been looking to improve its ability to send rockets into space, Titus said, so SpaceX’s ability to launch with more frequency is a benefit to the U.S. military.

Advertisement

SpaceX launched 96 rockets in 2023 from Vandenberg and three other facilities: Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida, NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Merritt Island, Fla., and SpaceX Starbase in Boca Chica, Texas.

Environmental groups argue that turning launches into a routine event could affect marine life.

“We’re concerned that more frequent launches will result in permanent changes,” said Ana Citrin, legal and policy director for the Gaviota Coast Conservancy.

Federal agencies, including the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service, monitor the effects of the liftoffs on such animals as sea otters, bats, western snowy plovers, California least terns and California red-legged frogs.

Thus far, the monitoring has shown that some of the animals might react to the blastoff by flushing, or fleeing from their nests and homes, but they return soon after, according to U.S. Space Force officials. No long-term effects have been seen, they said.

Advertisement

SpaceX did not respond to a request for comment.

Flushing or hunkering down after a blast are already signs of wildlife exhibiting signs of stress, said Duncan Leitch, a professor of integrative biology at UCLA.

Most animals can adapt to infrequent incidents, but exposure to more frequent stressful incidents can change their biology as well as their behavior, he said.

In the worst-case scenarios, he said, the ability of birds to communicate could be impeded, and migratory birds could avoid the area. Fish and other animals that use sound to communicate and navigate underwater — including whales — could be affected too.

“Over a longer period of time, there may be reductions in the population of fish as they move away from the sound, or they may be affected to the point that it affects their health,” Leitch said. “It would change the ecosystem as far as other animals that rely on the fish.

Advertisement

“Having sounds that are well into the damaging, or painful, range of decibels now occurring [100] times a year, the animals might not have the ability to change their behavior or accommodate these types of sounds.”

Some environmental groups, including the Surfrider Foundation, are asking the commission to reject the increase.

SpaceX “intends to begin increasing very rapidly, so we’re very concerned about this,” said Mandy Sackett, senior California policy coordinator for the Surfrider Foundation.

More frequent launches could change the way wildlife in the area responds in the long term, environmental groups said.

Members of the California Coastal Commission are also asking whether SpaceX should be entitled to circumvent the permit process, as federal agencies are.

Advertisement

Federal entities negotiate agreements with the commission but ultimately can move ahead even without commission approval. In such cases, the commission’s recourse would be through mediation or the courts.

Because SpaceX is a U.S. Space Force contractor, military officials argue that all launch operations at the base by the company are “federal activities.”

But U.S. Space Force officials said only 25% of the rockets launched into space by SpaceX are carrying payloads for the Department of the Defense.

The vast majority of the liftoffs are for the company’s private benefit, raising questions about why SpaceX can dispense with permits when 75% of its blasts from the base don’t involve the U.S. government.

“That is still pretty skewed for me,” Commissioner Mike Wilson said during a meeting Friday.

Advertisement

Some commissioners — whose focus is usually on environmental protection, development and water issues during their monthly meetings — also brought up the war in Ukraine during Friday’s discussion.

“I question the national security public benefit of concentrating that much power, literally communication power, in one company that we’re enabling in this case,” Wilson said. “[SpaceX] has already showed that it will play in international conflicts at the will of one human being.”

Wilson was referring to reports that Musk’s company refused to allow Ukraine to use satellite internet service from Starlink, a subsidiary of SpaceX, to help it carry out an attack against Russia in September 2022.

“If the idea is that we’re supporting these permits on the side that we’re promoting national defense, and then a single company is able to dismantle our allies during armed conflict — that really doesn’t align,” Commissioner Justin Cummings said.

“I suspect that would violate our strategies around national defense.”

Advertisement

Titus declined to address the question, saying it was “out of my lane,” but he said he would try to get answers to address the commissioners’ concerns.

Some commissioners on Friday also argued that SpaceX, not U.S. military officials, should be making the company’s case in front of the agency.

“When this comes back, I think it would be really important that a representative from SpaceX comes to the meeting,” Cummings said.

Cummings said it was “ridiculous” for SpaceX not to appear at the meeting, despite multiple efforts from the agency to have SpaceX officials speak.

“They obviously refuse to because they’ve never shown up,” he said.

Advertisement

On Friday, Commission Chair Caryl Hart suggested an agreement might not be possible unless SpaceX changes its stance.

“From my perspective,” Hart said, “I think we’re going to continue to hit significant obstacles in achieving a federal consistency ruling without having SpaceX.”

Continue Reading

Science

Pregnant? Researchers want you to know something about fluoride

Published

on

Pregnant? Researchers want you to know something about fluoride

Adding fluoride to drinking water is widely considered a triumph of public health. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says the cavity-prevention strategy ranks alongside the development of vaccines and the recognition of tobacco’s dangers as signal achievements of the 20th century.

But new evidence from Los Angeles mothers and their preschool-age children suggests community water fluoridation may have a downside.

A study published Monday in JAMA Network Open links prenatal exposure to the mineral with an increased risk of neurobehavioral problems at age 3, including symptoms that characterize autism spectrum disorder. The association was seen among women who consumed fluoride in amounts that are considered typical in Los Angeles and across the country.

The findings do not show that drinking fluoridated water causes autism or any other behavioral conditions. Nor is it clear whether the relationship between fluoride exposure and the problems seen in the L.A.-area children — a cohort that is predominantly low-income and 80% Latino — would extend to other demographic groups.

However, the results are concerning enough that USC epidemiologist Tracy Bastain said she would advise pregnant people to avoid fluoridated water straight from the tap and drink filtered water instead.

Advertisement

“This exposure can impact the developing fetus,” said Bastain, the study’s senior author. “Eliminating that from drinking water is probably a good practice.”

About 63% of Americans receive fluoridated water through their taps, including 73% of those served by community water systems, according to the CDC. In Los Angeles County, 62% of residents get fluoridated water, the Department of Public Health says.

The data analyzed by Bastain and her colleagues came from participants in an ongoing USC research project called Maternal and Developmental Risks from Environmental and Social Stressors, or MADRES. Women receiving prenatal care from clinics in Central and South Los Angeles that cater to low-income patients with Medi-Cal insurance were invited to join.

Between 2017 and 2020, 229 mothers took a test to measure the concentration of fluoride in their urine during their third trimester of pregnancy. Then, between 2020 and 2023, they completed a 99-question survey to assess their child’s behavior when their sons and daughters were 3 years old.

Among other things, the survey asked mothers whether their children were restless, hyperactive, impatient, clingy or accident-prone. It also asked about specific behaviors, such as resisting bedtime or sleeping alone, chewing on things that aren’t edible, holding their breath, and being overly concerned with neatness or cleanliness.

Advertisement

Some of the questions the mothers answered addressed health problems with no obvious medical cause, including headaches, cramps, nausea and skin rashes.

Among the 229 children — 116 girls and 113 boys — 35 were found to have a collection of symptoms that put them in the clinical or borderline clinical range for inward-focused problems such as sadness, depression and anxiety. In addition, 23 were in the clinical or borderline clinical range for behaviors directed at others, such as shouting in a classroom or attacking other kids, and 32 were deemed at least borderline clinical for a combination of inward and outward problems.

What interested the researchers was whether there was any correlation between a child’s risk of having clinical or borderline clinical behavioral problems and the amount of fluoride in his or her mother’s urine during pregnancy.

They found that compared to women whose fluoride levels placed them at the 25th percentile — meaning 24% of women in the study had levels lower than theirs — women at the 75th percentile were 83% more likely to have their child score in the “clinical” or “borderline clinical” range for inward and outward problems combined. When the researchers narrowed their focus to children in the clinical range only, that risk increased to 84%, according to the study.

The researchers also found that the same increase in fluoride levels was associated with an 18.5% increase in a child’s symptoms related to autism spectrum disorder, as well as an 11.3% increase in symptoms of anxiety.

Advertisement

The amount of fluoride needed for mothers to go from the 25th to the 75th percentile was 0.68 milligrams per liter. As it happens, that’s nearly identical to the 0.7 mg per liter standard that federal regulators say is optimal for preventing tooth decay.

Bastain said that allowed the researchers to compare what might happen to children in two parallel universes: a typical one where their mothers consumed fluoridated water during pregnancy, and an alternate one where they didn’t.

“You can use it as a proxy for if they lived in a fluoridated community or not,” she said.

What that thought experiment shows is that children in the fluoridated community face a higher level of risk. That said, it’s not clear when that risk becomes high enough to be worrisome.

“We don’t know what the safe threshold is,” Bastain said. “It’s not like you can say that as long as you’re under the 75th percentile, there are no effects.”

Advertisement

The study authors’ concerns about the effects of fluoride on developing brains didn’t come out of nowhere.

The National Toxicology Program — a joint effort of the CDC, the National Institutes of Health, and the Food and Drug Administration — has been investigating the issue since 2016. In a report last year that reviewed an array of evidence from humans and laboratory animals, a working group concluded “with moderate confidence” that overall fluoride exposure at levels at or above 1.5 mg per liter “is consistently associated with lower IQ in children.”

The working group added that “more studies are needed to fully understand the potential for lower fluoride exposure to affect children’s IQ.”

A 2019 study of hundreds of mothers in Canada — where 39% of residents have fluoridated water — found that a 1-mg increase in daily fluoride intake during pregnancy was associated with a 3.7-point reduction in IQ scores in their 3- and 4-year-old children.

And among hundreds of pregnant women in Mexico, a 0.5-mg-per-liter increase in urinary fluoride went along with a 2.5-point drop in IQ scores for their 6- to 12-year-old children, researchers reported in 2017.

Advertisement

Bastain and her colleagues write their study is the first they are aware of that examines the link between prenatal fluoride exposure and neurobehavioral outcomes in children in the United States. The results are sure to be controversial, Bastain said, but there’s a straightforward way for pregnant people to reduce the possible risk.

“It’s a pretty easy intervention to get one of those tabletop plastic pitchers” that filter out metals, she said. “Most of them do a pretty good job of filtering out fluoride.”

Continue Reading

Trending