Connect with us

Science

Ecuador Tried to Curb Drilling and Protect the Amazon. The Opposite Happened.

Published

on

Ecuador Tried to Curb Drilling and Protect the Amazon. The Opposite Happened.

YASUNÍ NATIONAL PARK, Ecuador — In a swath of lush Amazon rainforest right here, close to a number of the final Indigenous folks on Earth dwelling in isolation, employees lately completed constructing a brand new oil platform carved out of the wilderness.

Groups are drilling in one of the environmentally vital ecosystems on the planet, one which shops huge quantities of planet-warming carbon. They’re shifting steadily nearer to an off-limits zone meant to defend the Indigenous teams. It seems that a number of the nation’s largest oil reserves are discovered right here, too.

Ecuador is cash-strapped and battling debt. The federal government sees drilling as its finest approach out. The story of this place, Yasuní Nationwide Park, presents a case examine on how world monetary forces proceed to entice creating international locations into depleting a number of the most biodiverse locations on the planet.

Nations like Ecuador are “in opposition to the wall,” stated María Fernanda Espinosa, an Ecuadorean diplomat and a former president of the United Nations Common Meeting.

Drilling on this a part of the rainforest wasn’t Ecuador’s first alternative. In 2007, Rafael Correa, the president on the time, proposed a novel various that will have saved the oil reserves in a parcel right here designated as Block 43, estimated then at round a billion barrels, within the floor.

Advertisement

Below that plan, international locations would have created a fund of $3.6 billion, half of the oil’s estimated worth, to compensate Ecuador for leaving its reserves untouched. Supporters of the thought stated it could have been a win for the local weather, for biodiversity and for Indigenous rights. And, they stated, it could have been a precedent-setting ethical victory: A small, creating nation would have been paid for giving up a useful resource that helped make locations like america and Europe so rich.

However, after early fanfare, solely a pittance in contributions trickled in. Ecuador turned to China for loans, round $8 billion over the course of the Correa administration, some to be repaid in oil.

“Now that the worldwide development is to desert fossil fuels, the time has come to extract each final drop of profit from our oil, in order that it may serve the poorest whereas respecting the surroundings,” the present president, Guillermo Lasso, stated final yr.

Different nations are additionally trying to new oil growth, although the Worldwide Power Company has stated international locations should cease new initiatives to keep away from catastrophic local weather change. Growing nations say they need to be allowed to maintain utilizing fossil fuels, since, traditionally, they’re least in charge for local weather change. However these international locations are sometimes residence to the very ecosystems which can be most useful in serving to to stave off world warming and biodiversity collapse. The Democratic Republic of Congo, for instance, has put up for public sale oil blocks that embody rainforest, peatlands and components of a sanctuary for uncommon mountain gorillas.

In Ecuador, the oil business insists that drilling can happen with little harm, however scientists say that even one of the best instances up to now have led to deforestation and different pressures.

Advertisement

Extra oil extraction couldn’t come at a worse time for the world’s forests. With the Amazon weakened by deforestation and local weather change, scientists warn that the forest is approaching a threshold past which it may degrade into grassland. Some areas are already emitting extra carbon than they retailer, a ticking time bomb of greenhouse gases.

“Ecuador’s best wealth is its biodiversity,” stated Carlos Larrea, a professor at Simón Bolivar Andean College in Quito, the capital, who helped to design the failed fund. The destruction of Yasuní, he stated, “is suicide.”

Yasuní brims with life. It trills, squawks and hoots. The world’s tiniest monkeys, referred to as pygmy marmosets, scamper over branches, and the world’s largest rodents, capybaras, loll alongside riverbanks.

Advertisement

In a single parcel of simply 25 hectares, or about 60 acres, scientists have documented roughly 1,000 species of native bushes, across the similar quantity that exist in your entire United States.

No area of land on Earth is extra wealthy in biodiversity than this one, the place the Amazon climbs into the foothills of the Andes, in accordance with scientists. The genetic variety is an enormous, untapped useful resource that would unlock cures for illnesses and open doorways to technological improvements. However the fragmentation right here has already began.

“Nature all the time loses,” stated Renato Valencia, a forest ecologist at Pontifical Catholic College of Ecuador who has studied this space for many years. “On the subject of financial issues, that’s the rule.”

Even underneath the business’s finest practices, the ecosystem has suffered.

Within the Nineties, as oil manufacturing started close to these 25 hectares, executives went out of their option to shield nature, scientists stated. They strove to maintain deforestation to a minimal and employed scientists to check the native biodiversity.

Advertisement

“We saved hoping that this is able to be an instance whereby oil growth may coexist with a wild forest and its biota,” stated Robert S. Ridgely, an ornithologist who led the examine on birds. “But it surely simply didn’t prove that approach.”

The worst environmental harm got here not from oil contamination, the scientists stated, however from the corporate’s street. Regardless of strict controls, it attracted new Indigenous Ecuadoreans to the world, who lower down bushes to develop crops. Native hunters began killing extra animals to promote, together with threatened species. Unlawful logging is an issue.

The New York Instances reached out to authors of the company-funded research. Six of seven responded, every expressing grave concern in regards to the new drilling in Block 43.

“It’ll be one other full catastrophe,” stated Morley Learn, a zoologist who performed the examine on reptiles and amphibians.

Persons are in danger, too. In Yasuní, an unknown variety of males, ladies and kids dwell in what’s referred to as voluntary isolation, rejecting contact with the skin world. They’re referred to as the Tagaeri and the Taromenane.

Advertisement

Their reserve and a associated buffer zone are off-limits to drilling, however authorities officers have mentioned shrinking the protecting zone to succeed in extra oil.

“That’s the place nature put it,” stated Fernando Santos, the Ecuadorean power minister, in an interview in November. “And that’s the place we have to get it from, albeit very fastidiously.”

Per capita gross home product nearly doubled within the following fifty years, a barely quicker tempo than Latin America as a complete. Many credit score oil.

“There was a change from a really backward Ecuador to an Ecuador that has progressed to not the primary world however to the center — a breakthrough,” Mr. Santos, the power minister, stated.

However as oil revenues grew, world markets allowed the federal government to borrow extra closely.

Advertisement

“The factor that you simply see in Ecuador is that each time Ecuador has skilled the oil booms, that’s when the debt of Ecuador has skyrocketed,” stated Julián P. Díaz, a professor of economics at Loyola College Chicago.

Economists say poorer international locations get simply caught in this type of debt entice as a result of they’ve much less strong economies to start with and usually borrow at elevated rates of interest, since they’re thought-about riskier.

“Clearly we’re in monstrous debt,” Mr. Santos stated. However, whereas he acknowledges that oil performed a task in creating the issue, he additionally sees oil as the answer. With extra drilling and mining growth, he stated, “the nation will have the ability to get out of debt.”

Nevertheless, financial beneficial properties have barely trickled right down to communities which have lived shut to grease growth for many years. Greater than half the individuals who dwell within the Ecuadorean Amazon, the place the overwhelming majority of the nation’s oil comes from, are poor.

Ramiro Páez Rivera, an govt who has labored for a number of oil firms within the space, stated it was the federal government’s job to place oil taxes to good use.

Advertisement

“We pay tens of millions of {dollars},” he stated. “Individuals don’t even have potable water.”

Final yr, hundreds of Indigenous Ecuadoreans staged an 18-day strike that stopped a lot of the nation’s oil manufacturing. “We don’t need oil,” stated Leonidas Iza, president of the Confederation of Indigenous Nationalities of Ecuador, which helped lead the protests.

However whilst protesters demanded an finish to the president’s plans to double oil manufacturing, additionally they insisted the federal government carry down gas costs, one thing that usually creates extra demand.

“There’s a harsh actuality that in these 50 years our economies have grow to be depending on oil,” Mr. Iza stated.

The proposal in 2007 to depart the oil within the floor was an effort to chart a special path. A shocking determine pushed the proposal: the minister of power, Alberto Acosta.

Advertisement

It was “the minister of petroleum proposing to not extract the petroleum,” Mr. Acosta recalled. As a youthful man, he’d accepted as gospel that oil was the important thing to lifting Ecuador out of poverty. However after many years of manufacturing, the largest results he noticed had been air pollution and deforestation.

So Ecuador requested the world for $3.6 billion, half of what it predicted it could make by promoting the gas. At first, there have been optimistic indicators. The United Nations agreed to handle the fund. Germany and Italy pledged sources.

However some governments didn’t belief the president, Mr. Correa, a populist who had deliberately defaulted on international debt. Many appeared perplexed by the thought of paying a rustic to not do one thing. Mr. Correa was accused of blackmail as a result of he deliberate to drill if the cash didn’t materialize.

Because the Yasuní proposal misplaced momentum, China took on a rising affect in Ecuador, stepping in with billions of {dollars} in loans, some to be repaid in oil.

Ultimately, the Yasuni proposal solely raised about $13 million. “The world has failed us,” Mr. Correa advised the nation in August 2013.

Advertisement

Mr. Correa now lives in Belgium and faces arrest in Ecuador due to a corruption conviction.

After the failure of the Yasuní undertaking, a state-owned oil firm, now a part of Petroecuador, began knocking on doorways in Indigenous communities all through Block 43, providing cash, housing and sanitation initiatives.

In the present day, twelve platforms dot the forest, linked by a gravel street.

From every platform, employees are drilling dozens of wells, bent in several instructions to keep away from additional deforestation. A whole bunch of employees toil in shifts, 24 hours a day.

“We’re making an aggressive push given the bounds of what might be executed there,” stated Hugo Aguiar, Petroecuador’s normal supervisor.

Advertisement

Nevertheless, it’s unclear how lengthy the oil in Block 43 shall be definitely worth the funding. The heavy oil is much less helpful and emits extra carbon than lighter varieties. Over 90 % of what’s pumped is poisonous water that must be eliminated and handled, making operations dearer.

Many financial options have been studied, resembling carbon offset initiatives and creating markets for native merchandise like nuts.

However oil is likely one of the most worthwhile industries on the earth. To compete, authorities coverage and world collaboration are wanted, researchers say.

One concept gaining traction entails “debt for nature” offers. Ecuador is contemplating a giant one in coming months, getting banks to renegotiate a large portion of its debt in alternate for investing in a brand new marine reserve off the Galápagos Islands.

One other nation might strive its personal model of the Yasuní proposal. Seychelles, an Indian Ocean island nation underneath risk from rising sea ranges, is sponsoring oil exploration that might be used as leverage when asking rich international locations to assist fund renewable power initiatives.

Advertisement

Stress in opposition to oil in Ecuador continues to construct. After years of authorized hurdles, a poll measure asking if the federal government ought to hold Block 43 crude oil underground might lastly go to a vote.

“We’ll run all of the oil blocks down, run all of the ecosystems down, however we received’t resolve the issue of Ecuador’s financial system,” Mr. Iza, the Indigenous chief, stated. “We should consider one other kind of financial system.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Science

Opinion: Most older Americans who need hearing aids don't use them. Here's how to change that

Published

on

Opinion: Most older Americans who need hearing aids don't use them. Here's how to change that

Having depended on hearing aids for nearly three decades, I’m astounded by the lack of Medicare coverage for devices that can solve a problem afflicting tens of millions of older Americans.

Nearly two-thirds of Americans over age 70 have some degree of hearing loss, and over half of those 75 and older experience impairment serious enough to be considered disabling. But most don’t wear hearing aids.

Because the legislation that created Medicare nearly 60 years ago specifically excluded hearing aids, those who rely on the program’s traditional coverage must pay for them out of pocket. That expense is among the chief barriers to wider use of the devices.

Age-related hearing loss impedes basic communication and the relationships that depend on it. Expanded access to hearing aids could therefore do no less than enable more older Americans to establish and maintain the social connections that are essential to a meaningful life.

Hearing loss is like an invisible, muffling curtain that falls in front of anyone speaking. Asking people to repeat themselves can yield irritated and hurtful responses. And it’s hopeless to ask a soft-spoken person to speak up. Sometimes it’s easier just to nod and smile.

Advertisement

Many older people I know choose to avoid social gatherings altogether because they can’t hear well. Without hearing aids, I’d stay home too.

Hearing loss can harm one’s health in other ways. For example, I’ve written about the need for a comprehensive approach to reducing cancer risk at older ages, including preventive services such as colorectal cancer screening. But these services rely on conversations between patients and their healthcare providers. An older patient’s ability to hear and understand such conversations shouldn’t be taken for granted or ignored.

The Food and Drug Administration did improve access to hearing aids by making some of them available without a prescription in 2022, but the over-the-counter devices are inadequate for serious hearing loss like mine. My private health insurance, meanwhile, started covering hearing aids a few years ago, providing up to $2,500 for them every five years. One hearing aid alone can cost that much or more, however.

Despite its limitations, my private coverage for hearing aids is better than nothing, which is what traditional Medicare provides.

Hearing loss is more common among lower-income people and those without advanced education. The toll from noisy workplaces compounds age-related hearing loss for some. One analysis found that most Americans with a serious hearing disability can’t afford the typical price of hearing aids.

Advertisement

Many of the older adults who can’t come up with these significant out-of-pocket expenses spent their working years in low-wage jobs that our country depends on. Denying them treatment for their hearing loss is a lousy way to treat people who gave years of service to our society.

Although some older adults with hearing loss won’t benefit from hearing aids, Medicare coverage for the devices might encourage more beneficiaries to get their hearing tested so they can get the treatment that’s right for them. And while Medicare coverage alone won’t address the stigma some people associate with hearing aids, the availability of newer, more comfortable and less obvious technology might win over some refuseniks.

Legislation reintroduced with bipartisan support last year would finally correct this glaring gap in Medicare coverage by removing the hearing aid exclusion from the law. There’s no reason to delay action on this any longer. Are our representatives listening?

Mary C. White is an adjunct professor of environmental health at Emory University’s Rollins School of Public Health, a Public Voices fellow at AcademyHealth in partnership with the OpEd Project and a former federal epidemiologist.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Science

Second human case of bird flu detected in Michigan dairy worker

Published

on

Second human case of bird flu detected in Michigan dairy worker

A second human case of bird flu in a diary worker has been confirmed in Michigan, state and federal health officials announced Wednesday.

The symptoms were mild, consisting of conjunctivitis. The Texas dairy worker who contracted the virus in March also came down with pink eye.

At a press call on Wednesday, Nirav Shah, principal deputy director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said the finding was “not unexpected” and that it was a scenario “that we had been preparing for.”

He said that since the discovery of H5N1 in dairy cattle, state and federal health officials have been closely monitoring farmworkers and slaughterhouse workers and urging farmers and farmworker organizations to “be alert, not alarmed.”

Federal officials say they still believe the human health risk of bird flu is low; however, it underscores the need for people who are interacting with infected or potentially infected farm animals or birds to take precautions, including avoiding dead animals and wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) if there’s a need to be in close contact.

Advertisement

Though a nasal swab from the person in Michigan tested negative for influenza, an eye swab from the patient was shipped to the CDC and tested positive for influenza A(H5N1) virus.

This is the third case of H5N1 reported in the United States. A poultry worker in Colorado was identified in 2022.

Although the symptoms in the three farmworkers in the U.S. have been mild, people elsewhere in the world have suffered more severe illness, including death. According to the World Health Organization, between Jan. 1, 2003, and March 28, 2024, there have been 888 cases of human infection from 23 countries; 463 were fatal.

In preparation for a more widespread outbreak, the CDC updated its guidance for PPE in dairies and issued a nationwide order for healthcare providers to be on the lookout for novel influenza.

On Tuesday, the CDC asked clinical laboratories and health departments to increase the number of influenza samples being analyzed “to maximize the likelihood of catching a case of H5N1 in the community,” Shah said.

Advertisement

The US Department of Agriculture is also expanding its surveillance and support by providing $1500 to non-infected farms to beef up biosecurity, and $100 to producers who want to buy inline samplers to test their milk. The agency will also provide $2000 per farm to cover veterinary fees for testing, as well as shipping costs to send those tests to laboratories for analysis.

There have been no cases of H5N1 detected in California’s dairy herds.

Officials said ongoing analysis of the nation’s dairy supply suggests it is safe to consume, Despite the risk to human health being low, an official with the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response said it will make Tamiflu available upon request “to jurisdictions that do not have their own stockpile and are responding to pre-symptomatic persons with exposure to confirmed or suspected infected birds, cattle or other animal exposures.”

Dawn O’Connell, assistant secretary of the preparedness agency, said it started the “fill and finish” process for approximately 4.8 million doses of vaccine “that is well matched to the currently circulating strain of H5N1 through the national pre-pandemic influenza vaccine stockpile program.”

She said the decision to get started on H5N1 vaccines was not a response to any heightened concern, but since it takes several months to fill and finish vaccine doses, the agency “thought it made sense given what we were seeing.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Science

Gas stoves may contribute to early deaths and childhood asthma, new Stanford study finds

Published

on

Gas stoves may contribute to early deaths and childhood asthma, new Stanford study finds

Lung-irritating pollution created by cooking with gas stoves may be contributing to tens of thousands of premature deaths and cases of childhood asthma in the United States, according to a new study published in the journal Science Advances.

For decades, scientists have known the flames from a gas stovetop produce nitrogen dioxide, a pungent gas that can inflame a person’s lungs when inhaled. But for the first time, a team of researchers from Stanford University and Oakland-based research institute PSE Healthy Energy published a nationwide estimate of the long-term health consequences associated with cooking with natural gas and propane stoves.

Researchers concluded that exposure to nitrogen dioxide emissions alone may contribute to nearly 19,000 premature deaths in the United States each year. It has also resulted in as many as 200,000 current cases of pediatric asthma compared with cooking with electric stoves, which do not produce nitrogen dioxide.

Aggressive and impactful reporting on climate change, the environment, health and science.

Advertisement

Stanford researcher Yannai Kashtan noted higher levels of pollution were correlated with the amount of gas that was burned. But pollution also accumulated at higher levels inside smaller homes.

“If you live in a smaller house, you’re exposed to more pollution, and that can lead to income and racial disparities in exposure,” Kashtan said. “In general, folks living in neighborhoods with higher levels of outdoor pollution also tend to have higher indoor pollution. So this environmental injustice extends indoors as well.”

The American Gas Assn., a trade organization representing more than 200 local energy companies nationwide, dismissed the findings as “misleading and unsupported.”

“Despite the impressive names on this study, the data presented here clearly does not support any linkages between gas stoves and childhood asthma or adult mortality,” the association’s president and CEO, Karen Harbert said in a statement earlier this month.

Advertisement

The study is the latest examining the serious health effects associated with breathing fumes from gas stoves, which release planet-warming carbon emissions and a variety of air pollutants. In recent years, the popular household appliance has become a political hot-button issue as policymakers and regulators have weighed environmental impacts against consumer choice.

Many large cities in California, including Los Angeles, have moved toward phasing out gas stoves in newly constructed residences. Earlier this month, the California Assembly advanced a bill to the Senate that would require gas stoves to come with warning labels detailing the pollution and health effects that can arise from cooking with gas.

Gas stoves emit a variety of pollutants, including asphyxiating carbon monoxide, cancer-causing formaldehyde and benzene. The flame also creates nitrogen dioxide, a precursor to smog and a pollutant that can cause difficulty breathing.

Environmental groups say consumers should be notified about these pollutants and the potential harm they can cause.

“Gas stoves create pollution in our homes, increasing the risk of childhood asthma and other respiratory problems for our families,” said Jenn Engstrom, state director for California Public Interest Research Group. “However, this risk has largely been hidden from the public. Consumers deserve the truth when it comes to the danger of cooking with gas. Warning labels will give consumers what they need to make informed decisions when they purchase appliances for their homes.”

Advertisement

Kashtan and other researchers had previously discovered cooking with gas stoves presented a similar cancer risk as inhaling second-hand cigarette smoke. They also found some gas stoves leaked contaminants even when the burners were off.

The effects are especially devastating to children, whose smaller and still-developing lungs need to take more breaths than adults, Kashtan said. Older adults, especially those with cardiovascular or respiratory illness, are also more vulnerable to pollution from gas stoves.

To alleviate indoor air pollution, experts recommend using ventilation hoods and opening windows while cooking,

Starting in 2008, California required new and redeveloped homes to have ventilation that could prevent pollution from building up indoors. But during their research, measuring emissions in more than 100 households across the country, Yannai said they found many kitchens didn’t have ventilation hoods at all.

Although the health effects of breathing these pollutants are clear, researchers still wonder to what degree these conditions could be reversible. As communities take steps to mitigate their exposure or transition away, he said we could soon see the results.

Advertisement

“It’s never too late to stop breathing in pollution,” he said.

Continue Reading

Trending