Politics
Ukraine wants a no-fly zone. Why do the U.S. and NATO reject the idea?
As persistently as Ukrainians demand a no-fly zone to guard them from Russia, the U.S. and NATO simply as steadily insist it might’t be completed.
The requires a no-fly zone body it as existential: defending hundreds of thousands of determined Ukrainian civilians trapped in besieged villages from the may of Russia’s air pressure and its arsenal of cluster bombs. The pleas turned extra pressing when Russian forces attacked and captured Europe’s largest nuclear energy plant, situated in southern Ukraine and certainly one of a number of scattered across the nation.
But leaders together with President Biden and NATO Secretary-Basic Jens Stoltenberg have repeatedly turned apart the pleas from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, populations all through Europe and even some U.S. lawmakers.
“All of the individuals who die from this present day ahead can even die due to you, due to your weak point,” Zelensky stated bitterly final week, addressing leaders who once more opposed navy restrictions of Ukrainian airspace. “The alliance has given the inexperienced mild to the bombing of Ukrainian cities and villages by refusing to create a no-fly zone.”
Why are so many Western officers so adamant?
A no-fly zone, many Western officers say, would draw the U.S. and its NATO allies into direct fight with Russia, as fighter pilots from the 2 sides in concept would attempt to shoot one another down — an escalation that many liken to a world battle, one involving two main nuclear powers.
“The one option to implement a no-fly zone is to ship NATO fighter planes into Ukrainian airspace, after which impose that no-fly zone by taking pictures down Russian planes,” Stoltenberg stated. “We perceive the desperation, however we additionally imagine that if we did that, we’d find yourself with one thing that might finish in a full-fledged battle in Europe.”
In a single state of affairs that some analysts have raised, a U.S. or NATO fighter jet would discover itself within the place of firing on a Russian transport plane dropping paratroopers onto the battlefield. The Russian dying toll in such a case wouldn’t be restricted to the comparatively few members of a crew however may embrace presumably dozens of troopers.
Not simply fighter jets
It’s much more difficult than that. To implement a no-fly zone, air fight missions must be supported by ground-based operations that present intelligence, focusing on steering and different info. These could possibly be arrange in Poland or different NATO international locations within the neighborhood, or presumably from plane carriers offshore, nevertheless it represents one other stage of involvement.
And the U.S. and its NATO allies would additionally should be ready to go in over land to rescue downed pilots and maybe take out anti-aircraft weapons inside Russian or Belarusian territory.
At the least initially, “it will be a one-sided struggle as a result of U.S. and NATO airpower has a marked benefit,” stated Alexander Downes, co-director of the Institute for Safety and Battle Research at George Washington College. “However the danger is escalation. It’s a slippery slope from there to a taking pictures battle.”
What a couple of restricted no-fly zone over, say, a humanitarian hall for fleeing Ukrainians?
“No,” was the one-word reply from a senior U.S. Protection official on Monday.
Later, Pentagon spokesman John Kirby described the state of play within the skies over Ukraine. Russia has but to determine air superiority over your complete nation, he stated.
“It’s dynamic,” Kirby stated. “It modifications each day. However Ukrainian plane are flying. Russian plane are flying. Missiles from each are additionally within the airspace.”
Russian forces are more and more utilizing “long-range fires” with ballistic missiles, cruise missiles and even artillery launched from the air, the bottom and ships and submarines within the sea, Kirby stated. They declare a mounting variety of civilian lives.
Warning from Putin
Russian President Vladimir Putin has already warned in opposition to aggressive U.S. or NATO actions; even financial sanctions, he says, are tantamount to a declaration of battle.
And late final month he advised Russia’s navy to position nuclear forces on “excessive fight alert.” The U.S. has not modified its alert stage, with the Biden administration accusing Putin of “manufacturing threats.”
Nonetheless, momentum for a partial safety of the airways is rising. A bunch of overseas coverage consultants, together with many former U.S. authorities officers, acknowledged in an open letter launched Tuesday {that a} “restricted” no-fly zone executed by the U.S. and NATO allies over humanitarian corridors delivering help and permitting individuals to flee was not solely attainable however crucial.
“NATO leaders ought to convey to Russian officers that they don’t search direct confrontation with Russian forces, however they have to additionally clarify that they won’t countenance Russian assaults on civilian areas,” the letter states.
The 27 signatories embrace former ambassador to NATO and Ukraine particular envoy Kurt Volker and two-time U.S. ambassador to Ukraine William Taylor.
In concept, Russia has agreed to permit such safety for humanitarian corridors, however belief in Moscow’s guarantees and intentions is at a low level.
Is there a historical past of profitable no-fly zones?
Some navy historians level to the managed skies over Iraq within the Nineteen Nineties in reference to the primary Gulf Warfare.
However the structure was considerably totally different from Ukraine’s scenario. Within the Nineteen Nineties model, the zone was arrange not between two warring superpowers combating one another however amongst quite a few international locations working kind of in live performance to include a typical enemy, Iraq, and stop it from flying its plane.
Related zones have been established throughout the civil battle in Bosnia and Herzegovina from 1993-95, and throughout the Libyan civil battle in 2011 — with various levels of success and problems.
Opinions from Congress
A uncommon congressional voice in favor of a no-fly zone surfaced over the weekend. Rep. Adam Kinzinger, a Republican from Illinois and a former Air Drive fight pilot, stated it was pressing to cease Putin now earlier than his takeover of Ukraine is irreversibly entrenched.
“There’s danger,” he stated on CNN. “We clearly have a look at that with eyes vast open. However I believe there’s danger in inaction.”
His fellow Republican, Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, sided with the naysayers.
“A no-fly zone has develop into a catchphrase,” he advised ABC. “I’m undecided lots of people totally perceive what which means. It’s not some rule you cross that everyone has to oblige by. It’s the willingness to shoot down the aircrafts of the Russian Federation, which is principally the start of World Warfare III.”
A ‘tough line’
For now, the U.S. technique is to ship massive quantities of weaponry into Ukraine — a $350-million tranche is being delivered now — that can help Ukrainians in defending themselves.
“A lot of the harm being completed is by artillery and rocket hearth, not by the Russian Air Drive. So an NFZ, which I initially supported, won’t resolve the issue, but it brings all of the dangers of escalation,” retired U.S. Lt. Gen. Ben Hodges, former commanding basic of the U.S. Military in Europe, advised The Occasions.
“We wish to get the UAF [Ukrainian Air Force] the aptitude to knock down drones and helicopters,” he stated. “We ought to be in search of longer-term options.”
He steered Stingers, Avengers and Patriot surface-to-air missile techniques as splendid weapons.
Even because the U.S. will increase the quantity of weaponry it sends to Ukraine, it should achieve this with out showing to be immediately concerned within the battle. How Putin assesses that participation is one other query, stated Downes, of the Institute for Safety and Battle Research.
“It’s a really tough line to stroll,” he stated.
Politics
Ex-Rep. Charlie Rangel, 94, questions whether Biden belongs in nursing home, not White House
Former Harlem Congressman Charles Rangel — who is 94 years old — wondered whether President Biden belongs in a nursing home instead of the White House following last week’s debate disaster.
“I have never been more shocked and embarrassed by any presidential debate than I was last Thursday,” Rangel, who served in Congress from 1971 to 2017, said Sunday on 770 WABC radio’s “The Cats Roundtable.”
“One [candidate is] a convicted felon who has no respect for the truth, for morality. The other seemed so damned confused I didn’t even know whether he knew where the hell he was at in terms of responding to the moderator.”
Rangel, a Democrat, told host John Catsimatidis he “would not object” to both candidates taking cognitive tests to determine their fitness. Trump is 78, just three years younger than Biden.
FAUCI GIVES HIS OPINION ON WHETHER 81-YEAR-OLD BIDEN IS FIT TO RUN FOR A SECOND TERM
“It’s clear that Biden was shaky in responding … One has to think about what happens in [the next] four years.”
Biden’s debate performance was so troubling that voters have to be reminded that Trump could be sentenced to prison time for his conviction in the Stormy Daniels hush money case, Rangel said.
BIDEN DEBATE DEBACLE: 10 EYE-OPENING MEDIA RESPONSES, FROM MSNBC PANIC TO ‘THE VIEW’ CALLING FOR REPLACEMENT
He said in most states Republicans and Democrats will vote for their party nominee despite their flaws, and the election comes down to seven battleground states.
“If Trump is in jail, Republicans will vote for him. If Biden is in a nursing home, [the Democrats] are going to vote for him,” he said.
BIDEN’S ‘DISASTER’ DEBATE PERFORMANCE SPARKS MEDIA MELTDOWN, CALLS FOR HIM TO WITHDRAW FROM 2024 RACE
But Rangel wasn’t ready to abandon Biden, noting he was good on the stump the day after the debate.
“He was so on point, so articulate. He was better than he was at the State of the Union [address]. And I wondered, ‘Where the hell was that Joe Biden [during the debate]?’” he said.
Biden intends to seek re-election despite calls from the liberal New York Times, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution and even some Democrats that it’s time for him to step aside for the good of the party and the country.
During the debate, Biden frequently stumbled over his answers and at one point froze and then said “I beat Medicare.”
Rangel, during the latter part of 46 years in Congress, struggled with his physical health but appeared mentally sharp.
Politics
Ali: Racism and bigotry get a pass in 2024 as Trump talk that once shocked is normalized
President Biden has “become like a Palestinian.” The comment from former President Trump at Thursday’s debate in Atlanta was meant to be an insult aimed at his opponent’s handling of the Israel-Hamas war.
Despite the implicit bigotry of the barb, Trump’s vilification of an entire people in the form of a crude jab barely made the news.
There is plenty of analysis coming out of the 90-minute live debate — Biden’s terrible performance, Trump’s fountain of lies — but what I find most heartbreaking is the quiet acceptance of casual racism as part of our political discourse.
The former president’s bigoted rhetoric onstage last night doesn’t even qualify as a minor talking point in today’s discussions about the CNN telecast.
When Trump descended from the escalator and into the campaign scene in 2015, numerous headlines and stories were generated in response to his race-baiting comments about Mexican “rapists” and a “total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.”
Now, during one of the most-watched television events of the year, such ugliness has barely caused a ripple.
The stakes are much higher now than nine years ago, therefore we’re directing our energies elsewhere. This election is about upholding democracy and defeating fascism. But if we’re willing to accept derogatory remarks about race, faith or people as part of a campaign to win votes, we’ve given up.
During the debate, Trump claimed that Biden’s failed immigration policy resulted in millions of dangerous immigrants taking “Black jobs.” And if that weren’t xenophobic enough, Trump broadened his scare speak to include the loss of “Hispanic jobs” as well.
What exactly is a Black or Hispanic job? It’s hard to say because no one on the debate stage or behind the moderator desk bothered to ask. Co-anchors Dana Bash and Jake Tapper instead let the stunningly racist remarks glide through unchallenged, as if racial stereotyping were protected under CNN’s debate rules of no real-time fact-checking.
To be fair, the first debate of the 2024 presidential campaign was anything but business as usual.
Biden looked frail and bewildered. Trump was uncharacteristically controlled. And CNN served as a staging company rather than a news outlet. Post-debate discussions across multiple platforms have been dedicated to deconstructing the scene — the incumbent’s poor performance, his opponent’s avalanche of lies — yet they’ve largely overlooked the ugly leveraging of race and bigotry in their wider analysis of the event.
In short, there’s been little soul-searching about how such blatantly discriminatory statements were able to sail through undisputed.
The CNN broadcast revealed a sad truth about American politics in 2024: Xenophobic fear-mongering once relegated to the far-right fringe is now an acceptable starting point for mainstream dialogue about American politics and presidencies.
The conflation of Palestinians with the villainous dark side of a good vs. evil conflict is nothing new, especially from the MAGA-verse. Sadly, it’s not surprising that Trump’s Palestinian comment is being viewed as a bizarre and somewhat funny moment rather than a gross disparagement of an entire people.
Loaded slurs and statements about Palestinians, Arabs and Muslims are still an acceptable form of bigotry and hatred, even in these supposed “woke” times. I had hoped that dynamic might shift in my lifetime, but the media’s continued implied connections between Palestinians and Hamas, Muslims and terror, Arabs and spooky otherness, tells me not to keep my hopes up.
As for Black and Hispanic jobs, Thursday’s debate was more proof that we’re becoming inured to the racism of the right. The mainstream media — even left-leaning outlets — are so desensitized by MAGA’s repurposing of archaic stereotypes that they barely reacted to the association of Black and brown communities with crime, low-paying jobs, poverty, etc.
Hateful rhetoric has to be particularly egregious to trigger an outcry, and that’s a sign that intolerance is winning.
Pushing back against Trump’s demeaning commentary should have been Biden’s job on that debate stage, and he failed. CNN and the rest of the media also failed to highlight the danger of normalizing racism for votes.
If this approach wins the White House, we all lose.
Politics
Trump puts Biden on defense for Medicare Advantage cuts
Medicare benefits have emerged as an election hot topic, putting President Biden in a likely precarious situation with senior voters after slashing the popular Medicare Advantage program’s benefits ahead of the election.
“I will not cut one penny from Social Security or Medicare, which Joe Biden is destroying by letting millions of people come into our country. He’s destroying Medicare and Social Security,” Trump said during his rally on Temple University’s campus in Philadelphia last weekend, setting the stage for ongoing attacks against his 2024 competitor.
“Joe Biden has cut Medicare Advantage for the last two years. Did you know that? He’s cut your Medicare Advantage, which is a total betrayal of seniors. And just check, you’ll see it. He has cut you down for two years straight.”
Medicare was cited again during the first presidential debate of the election cycle on Thursday, where Biden’s disastrous performance included him saying, “We finally beat Medicare” as he stumbled over his words.
“He’s right, he did beat Medicare, beat it to death,” Trump fired back. “And he’s destroying Medicare because of all these people are coming in, they’re putting them on Medicare, they’re putting them on Social Security.”
BIDEN ADMIN THREATENING YOUR MEDICARE ADVANTAGE PLAN. HERE’S WHAT THEY’RE NOT TELLING YOU
Medicare Advantage (MA) plans, specifically, are private health insurance plans that contract with Medicare, and are used by more than 33 million Americans. The program mostly enrolls adults over the age of 65, but also offers benefits to people of all ages with disabilities. Traditional Medicare, conversely, is a federal health insurance program for adults over the age of 65, as well as younger individuals with disabilities.
BIDEN HOPES SENIORS WON’T NOTICE THIS CUT IN THEIR BENEFITS BEFORE THE ELECTION
The Biden administration in April finalized plans to cut MA benefits, which experts said could lead to an additional $33 a month for out-of-pocket costs, or $396 a year, for enrollees. Critics of the cuts said they would be especially devastating to seniors living on fixed incomes who are already coping with ongoing inflation issues.
Fox News Digital spoke to a former nurse, Republican New York congresswoman, and Consumer Product Safety Commission Chairwoman Ann Marie Buerkle, who said the cuts could prove devastating for the Biden administration, as the 46th president hits this election cycle’s fever pitch.
HEALTH CARE COSTS UP TO 300% HIGHER FOR PRIVATELY INSURED PATIENTS THAN THOSE WITH MEDICARE, REPORT REVEALS
“By letting far-left socialists control his policy agenda, Biden made a huge blunder that will jeopardize his support from the 33 million Americans enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans who will see their premiums go up, co-pays increase, and benefits decline before November,” said Buerkle.
The cuts come as the left-wing faction of Congress continues promoting “Medicare-for-all” legislation, which would establish a universal single-payer national health insurance system. Buerkle said the Biden administration’s cuts this year “actively sabotage MA,” likely in a backdoor attempt to promote a government-focused system, such as “Medicare-for-all.”
“Far left ideologues like Elizabeth Warren hate Medicare Advantage’s success as a public-private partnership because it undermines their argument for government-run health care, aka ‘Medicare-for-all.’ Biden has let these far left ideologues in his administration actively sabotage MA so they can prop up a government-run model and achieve their socialist agenda,” she said.
The sentiment was echoed in an op-ed published by Fox News Digital in May, by Heritage Action executive vice president Ryan Walker.
REPUBLICANS WARM TO SOCIAL SECURITY, MEDICARE REFORM AS 2024 ELECTION NEARS
“Biden and his allies want to cut MA in favor of more government-run, fee-for-service ‘Medicare-for-all’ – which would mean fewer options for physicians and coverage, like vision and hearing. Recently, progressive ringleader Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., and a coalition of 59 far-left House Democrats sent a letter to Biden arguing for ‘strengthening Traditional Medicare’ and redirecting funds ‘incorrectly going to MA,’” Walker wrote.
The Biden administration pushed back that “any claim that this Administration is cutting Medicare is categorically false” and “disinformation,” adding that “protecting Medicare is a key priority for President Biden and one of our highest priorities at HHS.”
“This is cherry picking numbers. Under the rate announcement, payments to Medicare Advantage plans are expected to increase by 3.7% next year, equivalent to over $16 billion. A $16 billion increase is not a cut,” the White House told Fox News Digital.
“Leave it to deep-pocketed insurance companies and industry front groups to characterize this year’s increase in Medicare Advantage payments as a cut. Disinformation being pushed out by high-paid industry hacks and their allies hurt Medicare beneficiaries and the Medicare Trust Fund.”
The administration added that it proposed a 1% increase in payments to insurance companies that provide Medicare Advantage order to “ensure they are accurately and appropriately compensated for covering the services their enrollees receive.”
“Like the 1% percent increase in payments that we are proposing for 2024, recovering overpayments from insurance companies is not a cut in payments – any such claim is categorically false.”
Buerkle previously wrote in an op-ed this year that Medicare benefits could be a “winning issue for Republicans,” citing that the states that voted for Trump in 2016, but switched to Biden in 2020 – Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin – are home to a majority of seniors who get their health care through MA.
“51% of Medicare-eligible Americans choose MA, and that number grows each year. Nearly all of them self-report satisfaction with the program. So, for 51% of seniors, Medicare Advantage is Medicare, so cuts to the program equate to cuts to Medicare. Trump understands that increasing health care costs for society’s most vulnerable population before an election is a stupendously dumb idea. Other Republicans should follow his lead,” Buerkle told Fox News Digital.
The MA plans are overwhelmingly supported by those enrolled, with a 2021 analysis finding 90% of enrollees reporting they are satisfied with the plan. Biden had also vowed during his State of the Union address in March that he would protect Social Security and Medicare from any cuts.
BIDEN CLAIMS HIS DEBATE PERFORMANCE WON OVER ‘MORE UNDECIDED VOTERS THAN TRUMP’ AT NJ FUNDRAISER
“Tonight, let’s all agree once again to stand up for seniors. Many of my friends on the other side of the aisle want to put Social Security on the chopping block. If anyone here tries to cut Social Security or Medicare or raise the retirement age, I will stop you,” Biden said during the State of the Union.
“Not only will these cuts increase out-of-pocket costs for seniors enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans by an average of $396 next year, cutting Medicare Advantage hurts Medicare solvency, too, since it’s less costly to the federal government compared to original Medicare and studies have shown that Medicare Advantage could help extend Medicare solvency by 17 years. MA delivers the same benefits as original Medicare for just 83 cents on the dollar,” Buerkle added.
THE NEW YORKER EDITOR CALLS FOR BIDEN TO STEP DOWN AFTER ‘ANTAGONIZING’ DEBATE PERFORMANCE
The cuts have faced no shortage of condemnation from Republicans and conservatives, who sounded off in April that seniors on fixed incomes would suffer further financial strains.
“America’s seniors are among the most vulnerable people in our society. Most live on a fixed income – Biden’s inflation has been a baked-in tax to everything they purchase. Now, he’s raising the price of the advantage plan – a plan that millions of seniors rely on,” Texas Sen. Ted Cruz posted on X. “This is unacceptable.”
DOCTORS EXPRESS CONCERN ABOUT BIDEN’S APPARENT COGNITIVE ISSUES DURING DEBATE: ‘TROUBLING INDICATORS’
“President Trump delivered on his promise to protect Social Security and Medicare in his first term, and President Trump will continue to strongly protect Social Security and Medicare in his second term,” Trump campaign national press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Fox News Digital.
BIDEN DEBATE DEBACLE: 10 EYE-OPENING MEDIA RESPONSES, FROM MSNBC PANIC TO ‘THE VIEW’ CALLING FOR REPLACEMENT
“The only candidate who poses a threat to Social Security and Medicare is Joe Biden–whose mass invasion of countless millions of illegal aliens will, if they are allowed to stay, cause Social Security and Medicare to buckle and collapse. By unleashing American energy, slashing job-killing regulations, and adopting pro-growth America First tax and trade policies, President Trump will quickly rebuild the greatest economy in history and put Social Security and Medicare on a stronger footing for generations to come.”
Axios reported earlier this year that Biden administration officials believed benefits for enrollees would remain stable through next year. Researchers, however, said the Biden campaign was taking a gamble with the cuts ahead of the election.
“President Biden’s team is gambling that MA beneficiaries won’t realize before the election the benefits Biden’s team is causing them to lose come January 2025,” Raymond James analyst Chris Meekins told the outlet.
-
News1 week ago
Tracking a Single Day at the National Domestic Violence Hotline
-
World7 days ago
Israel accepts bilateral meeting with EU, but with conditions
-
World1 week ago
Is Israel’s Smotrich fulfilling his dream of annexing the West Bank?
-
News1 week ago
Supreme Court upholds law barring domestic abusers from owning guns in major Second Amendment ruling | CNN Politics
-
News1 week ago
A Florida family is suing NASA after a piece of space debris crashed through their home
-
Politics1 week ago
Supreme Court upholds federal gun ban for those under domestic violence restraining orders
-
Politics1 week ago
Trump classified docs judge to weigh alleged 'unlawful' appointment of Special Counsel Jack Smith
-
World1 week ago
New Caledonia independence activists sent to France for detention