Connect with us

Politics

U.S. considers banning Russian oil, easing sanctions on Venezuela

Published

on

U.S. considers banning Russian oil, easing sanctions on Venezuela

President Biden is contemplating a ban on imports of Russian oil whereas weighing actions that may enhance vitality manufacturing by autocracies within the hopes of mitigating the influence on American customers and world vitality markets, U.S. officers mentioned.

“What the President is most targeted on is making certain we’re persevering with to take steps to ship punishing financial penalties on Putin whereas taking all motion essential to restrict the influence to costs on the gasoline pump,” White Home Press Secretary Jen Psaki mentioned Monday.

Till now, the financial strangulation of Russia by the West over its unprovoked invasion of Ukraine has averted its strong vitality sector, with administration officers suggesting that such a transfer might weaken the worldwide economic system.

Advertisement

However as Russia will increase its unrelenting bombardment of Ukrainian cities, political stress on the West has grown to do extra to place stress on Russian President Vladimir Putin to cease the onslaught. U.S. officers mentioned the Biden administration is contemplating easing restrictions on imports of oil from Venezuela to ease the void left by Russian oil bans, a politically problematic step. It has additionally sought to persuade Saudi Arabia, which has been underneath fireplace from U.S. and European officers over its human rights file, to spice up oil manufacturing.

Biden spoke Monday for greater than an hour with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, though the official White Home readout of the dialog didn’t explicitly state that they mentioned a ban on Russian vitality.

In accordance with the White Home, “the leaders affirmed their willpower to proceed elevating the prices on Russia for its unprovoked and unjustified invasion of Ukraine. In addition they underscored their dedication to proceed offering safety, financial, and humanitarian help to Ukraine.”

Psaki mentioned that administration officers are additionally discussing whether or not the U.S. would ship navy plane to Poland ought to its leaders ship Soviet-era bombers to help Ukraine, however famous that the White Home was not “stopping or blocking or discouraging” officers in Warsaw. “That’s they’re a sovereign nation they make they make their very own choices, however it’s not as simple as simply shifting planes round,” she mentioned.

The U.S. has been reluctant to get forward of European allies in responding to Putin’s aggression. And whereas an oil embargo from Washington would have some influence, doing so in live performance with Europe would ship far better influence. Europe imports 4 million barrels of Russian oil a day, in comparison with the 700,000 barrels imported each day by the U.S.

Advertisement

Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken mentioned Sunday throughout an interview with CNN that the administration was certainly exploring the “prospect” of an vitality ban “in a coordinated method” with allies, though he didn’t rule out the chance that Washington might act by itself to bar Russian oil.

“We need to be sure that we’re performing in coordination,” he mentioned. “I’m not going to rule out taking motion a method or one other, no matter what they do, however all the things we’ve achieved, the strategy begins with coordinating with allies and companions.”

In a transparent sign of how severely the Biden administration is contemplating the transfer, U.S. officers traveled over the weekend to Caracas for talks about doubtlessly easing sanctions imposed on the South American nation by the Trump administration in 2019. Trump took that step after declaring President Nicolas Maduro’s election victory a sham and recognizing one other politician, Juan Guaido, because the nation’s rightful chief, a place Biden has affirmed.

These measures constructed upon related sanctions imposed by then-President Obama, signaling the lengthy historical past of bother Washington has had with Caracas and its socialist leaders.

The Venezuela economic system is reeling, regardless of sitting on a few of the world’s largest oil reserves, and Maduro is probably going desirous to be freed from the sanctions. Nevertheless, his economic system and lots of of his authorities companies are deeply intertwined with Russian property and advisors. Any lenience by the White Home towards Maduro, even when it’s pushed by a need to crack down on Putin, might undercut Biden’s messaging concerning the existential risk that autocracies current to democracies.

Advertisement

Psaki on Monday batted away questions on a possible rapprochement with Caracas, telling reporters that any easing of sanctions was “leaping a number of phases forward” of the place talks at present stand.

Complicating issues has been Venezuela’s choice to imprison six executives from the Citgo oil firm for the final 4 years. 5 are U.S. residents and the sixth a U.S. everlasting resident. They had been convicted in present trials on trumped-up embezzlement prices and different crimes, based on their households and human rights activists.

Psaki mentioned discussions concerning the launch of the boys and sanctions reduction had been happening “in several channels,” and never tied collectively.

Republicans, who’ve seized on the potential vitality disaster to name for stepping up home fossil gasoline manufacturing, have already made clear that they’ll hit the White Home onerous ought to it look to offset any ban on Russian oil by trying to international suppliers.

Florida Sen. Marco Rubio blasted Biden in a tweet Sunday, saying: “Reasonably than produce extra American oil, he needs to exchange the oil we purchase from one murderous dictator with oil from one other murderous dictator.”

Advertisement

In the meantime, lawmakers on Capitol Hill have referred to as for banning Russian oil.

In a joint assertion Monday, the Republican and Democratic leaders of the Home methods and means committee and the Senate finance committee introduced they deliberate to introduce bipartisan laws “to [use] the instruments at our disposal to cease Russia’s unconscionable and unjust battle on Ukraine and to carry Belarus accountable for its involvement.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

Were undercover sources from other DOJ agencies present on Jan. 6? Grassley, Johnson demand answers

Published

on

Were undercover sources from other DOJ agencies present on Jan. 6? Grassley, Johnson demand answers

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

EXCLUSIVE: Senate Republicans are demanding answers on whether confidential human sources from Justice Department agencies beyond the FBI were used on Jan. 6, 2021, while also questioning whether Inspector General Michael Horowitz thoroughly reviewed classified and unclassified communications between handlers and their sources, warning that without that review, there may be a “major blind spot” in his findings. 

Horowitz last week released his highly anticipated report that there were more than two dozen FBI confidential human sources in the crowd outside the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, but only three were assigned by the bureau to be present for the event. Horowitz said none of the sources were authorized or directed by the FBI to “break the law” or “encourage others to commit illegal acts.” 

Advertisement

But now, Sens. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Ron Johnson, R-Wis., are demanding further information from Horowitz, writing to him in a letter exclusively obtained by Fox News Digital that it is “unclear” if his office reviewed the use of confidential human sources by other DOJ components during the Capitol riot. 

DOJ IG REVEALS 26 FBI INFORMANTS WERE PRESENT ON JAN. 6

Scene from Jan. 6, 2021, at the U.S. Capitol. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana, File)

“This IG report was a step in the right direction, but Senator Johnson and I still have questions the Justice Department needs to account for,” Grassley told Fox News Digital. “The American people deserve a full picture of whether Justice Department sources from its component agencies, in addition to the FBI, were present on January 6, what their role was, and whether DOJ had knowledge of their attendance.” 

Grassley told Fox News Digital that Horowitz and his team “must redouble its efforts to make sure it has reviewed all relevant information and provide a sufficient response to our inquiry.” 

Advertisement
Chuck Grassley, closeup shot

Sen. Chuck Grassley in the U.S. Capitol after the Senate luncheons on Sept. 24, 2024. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

Johnson told Fox News Digital he believes the report made public last week “may have only provided a fraction of the story regarding the presence and activities of confidential human sources or undercover federal agents in Washington, D.C. on Jan. 6, 2021.” 

“I urge the Inspector General’s office to be fully transparent about their work to ensure that Congress and the public have an accurate and complete understanding about what it actually reviewed,” Johnson said.

DOJ INSPECTOR GENERAL DOES NOT DENY FBI INFORMANTS WERE AMONG JAN 6 CROWD

Sen. Ron Johnson, Wisconsin Republican, in closeup shot

In their letter to Horowitz, Grassley and Johnson noted that the inspector general’s office received more than 500,000 documents from the Justice Department and its components as part of its investigation. 

“According to the report, your office obtained: CHS reporting, thousands of tips provided to the FBI, investigative and intelligence records from the FBI case management system, emails, instant messages, and phone records; contemporaneous notes of meetings and telephone calls; chronologies concerning the lead-up of events to January 6; after-action assessments; training materials and policy guides; and preparatory materials for press conferences or congressional testimony as well as talking points,” they wrote. 

Advertisement

Grassley and Johnson told Horowitz “it is vital” that his office “more precisely explain what records it sought and received from all DOJ component agencies.” 

Grassley and Johnson are demanding answers on whether Horowitz obtained evidence on whether other DOJ component agencies had tasked or untasked undercover confidential human sources in the Washington, D.C., area or at the Capitol building on Jan. 6, 2021. 

TRUMP SAYS WRAY RESIGNATION ‘GREAT DAY FOR AMERICA,’ TOUTS KASH PATEL AS ‘MOST QUALIFIED’ TO LEAD FBI

They are also asking if all communications were obtained between DOJ component agency handlers and confidential human sources or undercover agents present in the D.C. area, and whether he has received classified and unclassified non-email communication platforms used by the FBI. 

Grassley and Johnson are also demanding Horowitz share all FD-1023 forms, or confidential human source reporting documents, used in the investigation with them. 

Advertisement
Michael Horowitz, DOJ's inspector general, closeup shot

Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz speaks during a Senate Judiciary hearing on Sept. 15. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

As for his initial report, Horowitz “determined that none of these FBI CHSs was authorized by the FBI to enter the Capitol or a restricted area or to otherwise break the law on January 6, nor was any CHS directed by the FBI to encourage others to commit illegal acts on January 6.” 

The report revealed that the FBI had a minor supporting role in responding on Jan. 6, 2021 – largely because the event was not deemed at the highest security level by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). 

Horowitz, though, said the FBI took significant and appropriate steps to prepare for that role. 

According to the report, there were a total of 26 confidential human sources in the crowd that day, but only three of them were assigned by the bureau to be there. 

Advertisement

One of the three confidential human sources tasked by the FBI to attend the rally entered the Capitol building, while the other two entered the restricted area around the Capitol. 

If a confidential human source is directed to be at a certain event, they are paid by the FBI for their time.

Continue Reading

Politics

U.S. holds first meeting with rebels in charge of Syria

Published

on

U.S. holds first meeting with rebels in charge of Syria

Senior U.S. diplomats traveled to Damascus Friday and held a first-ever meeting with the rebels who toppled longtime dictator Bashar Assad. Washington officially regards the rebel group as terrorists.

U.S. officials said they pressed the transitional government established by rebels to respect the rights of Syria’s numerous ethnic and religious sects as well as women. They said they received new leads on the fate of long-missing American journalist Austin Tice but could not reach a conclusion about his whereabouts or whether he is alive.

In an initial gesture of goodwill, the Biden administration canceled a $10-million bounty it had placed on the head of the rebels’ leader, Ahmed Sharaa, also known as Abu Mohammad Julani.

Barbara Leaf, the top U.S. diplomat for the Middle East and leader of the delegation, said it made sense to remove the reward since she and the other officials were meeting with him face-to-face.

Leaf was accompanied by Roger Carstens, the administration’s lead official for hostage negotiations, and former special envoy for Syria Daniel Rubinstein. They spoke by telephone to reporters after departing Damascus.

Advertisement

It was the first time U.S. officials have formally visited Damascus since the U.S. Embassy there was shuttered in 2012 as the country descended into a savage civil war. Backed by Russia and Iran, the Assad regime is believed to have killed tens of thousands of people, while many more were tortured in crowded, dismal secret prisons.

Assad fled the country two weeks ago as rebels led by Sharaa’s group, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, or HTS, stormed Damascus. It was a swift and spectacular collapse of a dynastic regime that terrorized the nation for half a century.

But the next steps are complicated for U.S. policymakers. Washington has formally labeled HTS a terrorist group. HTS traces its roots to terror groups Islamic State and Al Qaeda but claims it has reformed. The designation carries with it numerous economic sanctions and complicates assistance from aid groups or other parties.

Leaf would not say whether HTS would be removed from the terror list or if sanctions would be lifted.

Asked if she believed Sharaa had become a more moderate leader, Leaf seemed willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. She described him as “pragmatic” and the talks as “quite good, very productive, detailed,” covering “a wide set of issues, domestic and external.”

Advertisement

“We’ve been hearing this for some time, some very pragmatic and moderate statements on various issues from women’s rights to protection of equal rights for all communities, etc.,” Leaf said. “It was a good first meeting. We will judge by deeds, not just by words. Deeds are the critical thing.”

Carstens said U.S. officials had believed Assad maintained around a dozen clandestine prisons, but as victims emerge and information comes to light, it appears there could have been 40 or more. While the U.S. has been working with what Carstens called credible evidence that Tice, the journalist, may have been held in as many as six prisons, new information indicates he might have been at one or two others. Searching is slow-going because the U.S. still has a limited presence in Syria, primarily a few hundred troops but no diplomatic or law enforcement personnel.

“We’re going to be like bulldogs on this,” Carstens said. “We’re not going to stop until we find the information that we need to conclude what has happened to Austin, where he is, and to return him home to his family.”

Tice, a freelance reporter who would be 43 years old now, was snatched by gunmen at a checkpoint near Damascus in August 2012 and has not been heard from since.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Biden considers commuting the sentences of federal death row inmates: report

Published

on

Biden considers commuting the sentences of federal death row inmates: report

As President Biden’s term comes to an end, he is reportedly considering commuting the sentences of most, if not all, of the 40 men on the federal government’s death row.

The Wall Street Journal, citing sources familiar with the matter, reported that the move would frustrate President-elect Trump’s plan to streamline executions as he takes office in January.

Attorney General Merrick Garland, who oversees federal prisons, recommended that Biden commute all but a handful of egregious sentences, the sources said.

The outlet reported that possible exceptions could include Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the 2013 Boston Marathon bomber who killed three and wounded more than 250; Robert Bowers, who killed 11 people in the 2018 attack on the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh; and Dylann Roof, who in 2015 killed nine at the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston, South Carolina.

TRUMP EXPECTED TO END BIDEN-ERA DEATH PENALTY PAUSE, EXPAND TO MORE FEDERAL INMATES

Advertisement

President Biden speaks about his administration’s economic playbook and the future of the American economy at the Brookings Institution in Washington Dec. 10, 2024. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

Those who could see their death sentences commuted to life in prison include an ex-Marine who killed two young girls and later a female naval officer, a Las Vegas man convicted of kidnapping and killing a 12-year-old girl, a Chicago podiatrist who fatally shot a patient to keep her from testifying in a Medicare fraud investigation and two men convicted in a kidnapping-for-ransom scheme that resulted in the killings of five Russian and Georgian immigrants.

TRUMP VOWS TO CREATE COMPENSATION FUND FOR VICTIMS OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT CRIME

The move came after Biden, a lifelong Catholic, spoke with Pope Francis Thursday. In his weekly prayer, Pope Francis asked for the commutation of America’s condemned inmates.

A decision from the president could come by Christmas, some of sources said. The outlet noted that the biggest question is the scope of the commutation of the death row inmates.

Advertisement
Biden at event

President Biden speaks at a podium (AP )

Biden is the first president to openly oppose capital punishment, and his 2020 campaign website declared he would “work to pass legislation to eliminate the death penalty at the federal level and incentivize states to follow the federal government’s example.”

In January 2021, Biden initially considered an executive order, sources familiar with the matter told The Associated Press, but the White House did not issue one.

Six months into the administration, Attorney General Merrick Garland announced a moratorium on federal capital punishment to study it further. The narrow action has meant there have been no federal executions under Biden.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending