Connect with us

Politics

Newsom signs bills to close Inglewood Oil Field and increase fines on idle wells

Published

on

Newsom signs bills to close Inglewood Oil Field and increase fines on idle wells

Escalating his fight against the fossil fuel industry, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed bills Wednesday that will shut down the sprawling Inglewood Oil Field by 2030 and ramp up fees that companies must pay to cover the cost of cleaning up 40,000 idle wells across the state.

Standing on a Los Angeles soccer field with oil wells pumping behind him, Newsom also signed a third bill that will strengthen local government’s power to restrict oil and gas production in their jurisdictions.

“We are here at this pivotal moment,” Newsom told reporters. “We are taking on Big Oil and having a real chance of winning.”

The governor signed the bills as lawmakers in Sacramento are debating his proposal to force refineries to keep extra reserves on hand in an attempt to avoid price spikes at the pump.

Oil companies say Newsom’s refinery proposal would increase gas prices rather than save consumers money. An oil industry representative said the bills signed by the governor Wednesday would add yet another burden to motorists.

Advertisement

Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks at a news conference in Inglewood, where he signed legislation related to oversight of oil and gas wells in Los Angeles.

(Jason Armond / Los Angeles Times)

“Today’s press conference is just more political theater — signing bills that pile on mandates and drive up costs for Californians,” said Catherine Reheis-Boyd, president of the Western States Petroleum Assn. “These new laws do nothing to produce more oil here at home and, in fact, cost jobs while forcing us to bring in more oil from overseas.”

“More mandates won’t lower gas prices or help California families,” she said.

Advertisement

Environmental and public health groups praised Newsom for signing the bills. “No drilling where we’re living” chanted some advocates attending the news conference.

“In a win for communities fighting for clean air and water, the bills signed today will clean up dirty idle wells and affirm the right of local governments to regulate oil and gas drilling in their jurisdictions,” said Nicole Ghio, at Friends of the Earth.

The 1,000-acre Inglewood Oil Field, which is located mostly in the unincorporated area of Los Angeles County known as Baldwin Hills, has 835 unplugged wells, including 655 that are actively pumping oil, according to state data. More than 400 of those wells produce less than 15 barrels a day.

The bill known as AB 2716 requires the low-producing wells to be plugged, beginning in 2026. And all wells in the field must be plugged by the end of 2030, effectively shutting down the field.

Owners of wells not complying with the law must pay a fine of $10,000 each month. The money will go into a community fund that will pay for parks and other benefits for the communities within 2½ miles of the oil field.

Advertisement

“The Inglewood Oil Field is the largest urban oil field in our state,” said Assemblyman Isaac Bryan (D-Culver City), who wrote the bill. “Production in recent years has been marginal, but for decades the negative health impacts surrounding it have cost the nearby community with their life expectancy.”

“Today, with Gov. Newsom’s signature, we will finally shut it down and establish the state’s first repair fund for the front-line communities who have been organizing for years to be seen, heard, and protected,” Bryan said.

Sentinel Peak Resources, a Denver-based company that owns and operates the Inglewood field, said the bill signed by Newsom “represents a dizzying number of illegal state actions, the likes of which should concern industries and businesses throughout the state of California,” including by targeting an individual company in a specific location.

The company added that it “looks forward to successfully defending our position” in court.

Part of the oil field is within the limits of Culver City. Late last year, the company signed an agreement with Culver City to ban oil drilling in the city’s portion of the Inglewood Oil Field and seal the 38 wells in that part of the field by 2030.

Advertisement

More than a century of oil and gas drilling in California has left more than 100,000 wells unplugged, allowing them to leak planet-warming methane and dangerous chemicals, such as benzene.

The cost of properly closing these wells could run as high as $23 billion, according to a recent Sierra Club analysis. Some activists and state legislators argue that taxpayers could be on the hook for those capping expenses if oil companies fail to take responsibility.

About 40,000 of California’s uncapped wells are classified as idle, meaning they haven’t produced any oil or gas in at least two years.

The bill known as AB 1866 addresses the idle wells by increasing fees that must be paid to the state and strengthening regulations to try to make oil companies accountable for maintaining and plugging the wells.

“This is a landmark victory for taxpayers and communities most affected by the harmful health impacts of neighborhood oil drilling,“ said Assemblyman Gregg Hart (D-Santa Barbara), who wrote the bill.

Advertisement

The third bill, known as AB 3233, gives cities and counties greater authority to impose restrictions on oil and gas operations, including by limiting or prohibiting new developments in their jurisdictions. The bill is aimed at addressing a recent court decision that had challenged local governments’ ability to regulate drilling.

“The governor’s decision to sign this legislation has restored our right to act,” said Los Angeles City Councilmember Paul Krekorian. “We intend to continue our aggressive efforts to protect Angelenos from the hazards of fossil fuel extraction in densely populated areas.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

Armed Services Republicans, White House push back against claims that Zelenskyy's PA visit was 'political'

Published

on

Armed Services Republicans, White House push back against claims that Zelenskyy's PA visit was 'political'

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s visit to a U.S. Army ammunition plant in Scranton, Pennsylvania on Sunday has come under fire from some Republicans including Speaker Mike Johnson for being partisan.

Johnson wrote in a letter to Zelenskyy, “The tour was clearly a partisan campaign event designed to help Democrats…”

ZELENSKYY QUESTIONS CHINA’S ‘TRUE INTEREST’ BEHIND PLAN TO END RUSSIA’S WAR

The visit was at the request of Ukraine to thank the American workers who have helped boost ammunition production for Ukraine to defend against Russia, White House and Pentagon officials told Fox News.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy attends a joint press conference with Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, in Kyiv, Ukraine, Friday, Sept. 20, 2024.  (Christoph Soeder, Pool Photo via AP)

Advertisement

Elected officials who attended the event were all Democrats, but that is because it is standard procedure to invite House and Senate members who represent the district where the visit is located.

JOHNSON DEMANDS ZELENSKYY FIRE UKRAINE’S AMBASSADOR TO US AMID FALLOUT FROM PENNSYLVANIA TRIP

In this case, all elected officials happened to be Democrats due to what is called the “geographical jurisdiction,” a defense official told Fox News.

Mike Johnson

U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson wrote in a letter to Zelenskyy, “The tour was clearly a partisan campaign event designed to help Democrats…” (Getty Images)

Zelenskyy has met exclusively with Republicans in past trips due to this same reason of who happens to be in elected office in the districts he is visiting.

VOLODYMYR ZELENSKYY’S VANCE CRITICISMS COULD COME BACK TO HAUNT HIM, REPUBLICANS WARN

Advertisement

Zelenskyy visited Utah in July of this year to meet with Utah’s Republican Gov. Spencer Cox and met with Utah’s all-Republican Congressional delegation.

NGA Summer Meeting 2024 Day 2 07/12/24

Zelenskyy visited Utah in July of this year to meet with Utah’s Republican Governor Spencer Cox and met with Utah’s all-Republican Congressional delegation. (Utah State Office of the Governor)

Senator Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) the Senate Armed Services Committee’s top Republican said in a statement, “If President Zelenskyy came to Mississippi, he would be accompanied by Republican officials because that’s who the people in their wisdom elected.”

The U.S. Army helped arrange the visit, White House press secretary KJP told Jacqui Heinrich in today’s briefing

Jacqui Heinrich questioned KJP about this in the WH briefing earlier this afternoon-

Advertisement

Karine Jean-Pierre: “This is something that Ukrainians asked for. They did this a couple months ago in Utah, in Utah, with a Republican governor and Republican, elected officials were there as well. We didn’t hear any type of investigation request when we went to a Republican state. We didn’t.”

Continue Reading

Politics

‘No one interfered’: Sex abuse in L.A. County juvenile halls in spotlight at Senate hearing

Published

on

‘No one interfered’: Sex abuse in L.A. County juvenile halls in spotlight at Senate hearing

Testifying Wednesday before a Senate Judiciary subcommittee, Breane Wingfield said she was 14 when, in 2005, she was sexually assaulted in a van by a deputy probation officer employed at Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall in Downey.

It happened again at a holding cell at the Compton Courthouse, she said. And again, almost daily, she alleged, by a guard at Camp Joseph Scott, a juvenile probation facility in Santa Clarita.

“No one interfered or protected us,” said Wingfield, 32, her voice cracking as she recounted the abuse. “I did what I needed to do to survive.”

Wingfield’s testimony came during a hearing titled “Sexual assault in U.S. prisons two decades after the Prison Rape Elimination Act.” Sen. Cory Booker (D-New Jersey), chair of the subcommittee on criminal justice and counterterrorism, said it’s clear that sexual violence has persisted despite the 2003 law, which aimed to eradicate rape of prisoners in correctional facilities across the country.

Advertisement

The hearing was meant to invite reflection on the law and explore possible improvements to reduce sexual abuse in carceral settings.

“We were all horrified when seven correctional officers, including the warden and [rape elimination act] coordinator, were sentenced for sexually abusing those in custody at FCI Dublin in California,” he said, referring to a high-profile conviction last year of employees at a women’s prison where sexual abuse was so rampant it was known as the “rape club.”

“I’m confident that the solutions we will explore today enjoy the same bipartisan, united response we saw 21 years ago.”

Wingfield’s testimony brings L.A. County’s abuse-plagued juvenile halls and camps to a national stage.

Sexual abuse within the county’s Probation Department has been in the local spotlight since 2020, when California passed a law providing victims of childhood sexual abuse a new window to sue. Since then, the county has been flooded with claims of abuse from those placed in its sprawling network of foster homes, children’s shelters and probation camps and halls.

Advertisement

County officials have said some of the alleged incidents date as far back as the 1950s and many of the facilities have since closed.

The Probation Department declined to comment on Wingfield’s testimony, noting a policy of not commenting on pending litigation.

For years, victims say, the Probation Department tolerated unchecked sexual abuse at the camps and halls where they were confined. Many say they reported the abuse to higher-ups but were punished rather than protected. Abusers remained on the county payroll for years, the accusers’ attorneys allege.

At least 20 women have accused Thomas E. Jackson, then a deputy at the Santa Clarita juvenile camp, of molesting them starting in the late 1990s. Jackson resigned from the department last fall. The Times reported last year that the county had placed nearly two dozen staff members on leave after accusations of sexual violence.

County officials said last year that they were anticipating spending between $1.6 billion and $3 billion resolving the deluge of lawsuits from the then-3,000 plaintiffs. Some attorneys have argued that the county should set up a “sexual abuse survivors fund” to pay victims.

Advertisement

At the Senate hearing, witnesses included survivors of sexual assault, criminal justice experts and the head of a union representing prison staffers. Survivors said educational information given to inmates didn’t do enough to help them understand their rights or know what to do if they were abused. Witnesses also said staffing and resource shortages contributed to failures of the sexual abuse prevention law, and that auditors aren’t given enough time on site to adequately judge whether facilities are meeting the law’s standards.

Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.) said he didn’t buy the idea that staffing shortages contributed to failures.

Booker agreed: “You’re scratching at a bigger issue, which is clearly the law that we designed is not working.”

Wingfield, who graduated from Cal State Long Beach in 2022, now works as a substitute teacher. She said the abuse still haunts her, and without health insurance she can’t afford a therapist.

“In moments where I have not seen a way out, I’ve had to call crisis hotline after hotline, grasping at anything to keep me alive,” she told the senators. “This investigation is long overdue, because the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 isn’t being enforced.”

Advertisement

Wingfield said testifying gave her some hope. She asked the senators to not just listen but to do something to end the cycle of suffering.

“This is the first step towards accountability,” said Courtney Thom, an attorney whose firm represents over 100 clients suing the county, including Wingfield. “Not only for the people who abuse children in the camps and juvenile halls, but also the entities that continue to allow this happen.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Maryland Senate race: Democrat Alsobrooks leads Republican Hogan in closely watched contest

Published

on

Maryland Senate race: Democrat Alsobrooks leads Republican Hogan in closely watched contest

The Democratic candidate for senate in Maryland has pulled significantly ahead of her Republican rival, according to a recent poll. 

The Washington Post-University of Maryland poll released Thursday shows Democrat Angela Alsobrooks holding an 11% lead over her rival, Republican Larry Hogan.

Alsobrooks is leading Hogan 51% to 40%, according to the Washington Post-University of Maryland poll. 

ACCUSATIONS OF IMPROPER TAX BREAKS FLY IN CRUCIAL SENATE RACE: ‘RULES DON’T APPLY’

Maryland Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate and Prince George’s County Executive Angela Alsobrooks speaks at a campaign event on Gun Violence Awareness Day at Kentland Community Center in Landover, Maryland. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Advertisement

The gap between them among likely voters is surprising, given that both candidates enjoy a similar level of popularity with respondents.  

Approximately 53% of respondents expressed favorable impressions of Hogan, compared to 27% who reported an unfavorable impression. Respondents gave Alsobrooks a 50% favorability rating, compared to 22% unfavorability.

Registered voters in the poll ranked the economy as the most important issue of the November elections, followed by immigration and then abortion.

MARYLAND SENATE RACE POLL SHOWS DEMOCRAT ALSOBROOKS LEADING GOP’S HOGAN, DESPITE ONE IN THREE NOT KNOWING WHO SHE IS

The Washington Post-University of Maryland poll was conducted between Sept. 19 and Sept. 23 with a sample size of 1,012 registered voters. 

Advertisement

It has a reported margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.

With Democrats outnumbering Republicans by a roughly two-to-one margin in the state, Hogan will need a good chunk of cross-over voters to have a chance and has been highlighting his opposition to Trump and his independence from his party as he runs for the Senate.

CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Former Maryland Governor Larry Hogan

Former Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan speaking at an annual meeting of the Republican Jewish Coalition. (AP Photo/John Locher)

Hogan, who flirted with a 2024 White House run before deciding against it, stood out from most other Republicans this spring for publicly calling for the guilty verdicts in Trump’s criminal trial to be respected.

Hogan skipped July’s Republican National Convention, where Trump was formally nominated, and has said he would not be voting for the former president. Hogan’s campaign, after the former president’s comments, spotlighted in a statement that “Governor Hogan has been clear he is not supporting President Trump just as he didn’t in 2016 and 2020.” 

Advertisement

Republicans are also aiming to flip seats in Ohio and Montana, two states Trump comfortably carried four years ago. And five more Democratic-held seats up for grabs this year are in crucial presidential-election battleground states.

Fox News Digital’s Paul Steinhauser and Julia Johnson contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending