Connect with us

Politics

Lawmakers question oil executives on price gouging, but seem cool to price controls

Published

on

Lawmakers question oil executives on price gouging, but seem cool to price controls

As shoppers fume over skyrocketing costs for gasoline and different commodities, congressional Democrats on Wednesday referred to as executives from massive oil corporations on the carpet to clarify why they seem like making unseemly fats income within the face of a global disaster.

The Home listening to, given the title “Gouged on the Gasoline Station: Huge Oil and America’s Ache on the Pump,” was partially a response to Republicans’ marketing campaign accountable Democrats for inflation, now operating at a 40-year excessive and rising.

However in each events, the blaming quantities to little greater than political rhetoric and jawboning as a result of neither aspect is ready to push for the sort motion that Washington has typically resorted to in wartime emergencies, specialists say.

Advertisement

“That is theater,” mentioned Dean Baker, senior economist on the left-leaning Middle for Financial and Coverage Analysis. “I want I might say they’re going to study one thing and so they’re going to someway form something they could do. However that is theater.”

In instances previous, presidents of each events have taken a lot stronger steps to curb war-induced inflation. Through the Vietnam battle, President Nixon referred to as for federal value controls to rein in costs. In World Conflict II, President Franklin D. Roosevelt imposed rationing on gasoline and a variety of different shopper merchandise, together with meals.

And a regulation referred to as the Protection Manufacturing Act offers a president far-reaching powers to intervene in an emergency.

However over previous many years, leaders in each political events in addition to most economists have come to simply accept the concept that interference in markets is counterproductive and ill-advised. Immediately, a politician who recommended one thing like government-mandated value controls would possible be denounced as radical.

Though some argue that such steps could be an efficient brake on costs within the quick time period, proof from the previous means that, if left in place for lengthy durations, they provide rise to dishonest and different market distortions attributable to authorities forms and allocation guidelines.

Advertisement

“There would have been no gasoline traces besides for presidency,” mentioned Allen Matusow, a historian at Rice College’s Baker Institute for Public Coverage, referring to the primary main oil shock in 1973 when automobiles snaked again for miles ready to refill.

Wednesday’s listening to tried to show a highlight on the oil business, already beneath assault from Democrats for not doing sufficient on local weather change.

And President Biden’s transfer to launch one million barrels of crude oil a day from U.S. strategic stockpiles — a step taken by a number of of his predecessors to ease shopper ache — ought to assist, though it often takes about six weeks for a provide of crude to be processed into gasoline and delivered to gasoline stations.

In the meantime, briefly suspending gasoline taxes, as a couple of states have achieved, cuts solely pennies on the greenback for shoppers, who’re seeing document will increase on the pump and of their heating oil payments.

Nationally, gasoline costs averaged $4.164 a gallon Wednesday, down from a document $4.331 on March 11 however nonetheless up 45% from a 12 months in the past. Wednesday’s common in California was a nation-leading $5.823 a gallon.

Advertisement

Spurred by what appears to be a protracted battle in Ukraine, costs could keep uncomfortably excessive for a while if markets are left to their very own.

Towards that backdrop, the Home Committee on Vitality and Commerce chairman, Frank Pallone Jr. (D-N.J.), accused the oil business of placing income above nationwide pursuits.

“The issue going through American shoppers isn’t a results of Biden administration insurance policies however slightly the actions oil corporations have taken to maintain provide low, costs excessive and income flowing,” Pallone mentioned in a letter inviting prime executives at Shell, BP, Exxon Mobil and Chevron, together with two smaller producers, to testify Wednesday.

Of their ready remarks, leaders of the 4 built-in power giants, which recorded a mixed $70.5 billion in income in 2021, prevented the matter of their hefty earnings altogether, though some famous that the business was hammered the 12 months earlier than when the COVID-19 pandemic brought on a historic collapse in demand that despatched international oil costs plunging.

The identical 4 corporations collectively misplaced greater than $28 billion in 2020, led by Exxon Mobil, and the business was the one one in all a dozen main S&P 500 sectors that recorded detrimental earnings that 12 months.

Advertisement

The CEOs of Exxon Mobil and Chevron, the 2 largest U.S.-headquartered oil corporations, each referred to the oil disaster a half-century in the past when OPEC members imposed an embargo in opposition to the USA — suggesting that the blame then, as in the present day, lies not with the oil corporations however with international shocks that distort provide and demand.

Traditionally, the one largest determinant in gasoline costs is what’s taking place with crude oil, whose value is ready in worldwide markets. Crude provides have been already tight earlier than Russia launched its battle on Ukraine in late February as financial restoration and oil demand rose quicker than anticipated.

The worth of Brent crude, the worldwide oil benchmark, fell to lower than $20 a barrel in mid-April 2020, however steadily rose in 2021 after which shot up this 12 months, to a excessive of $123 a barrel, amid fears of an invasion in Ukraine.

Russia is a significant producer and exporter of oil and pure gasoline. In current days Brent crude has been buying and selling round $105 a barrel.

Nonetheless, retail gasoline costs can differ extensively, relying on native situations, competitors and different elements. Michael Wirth, chairman and chief govt officer at San Ramon, Calif.-based Chevron, mentioned his firm owns and operates solely about 300 gasoline stations in three states, the overwhelming majority in California.

Advertisement

Total, he mentioned, there are greater than 150,000 filling stations throughout the nation, and nearly all of them are not less than nominally independently owned companies.

“As a result of oil is a worldwide commodity, Shell doesn’t set or management the worth of crude oil,” mentioned Gretchen Watkins, president of Shell USA, a unit of the British-based firm. “Equally, Shell doesn’t set or management the worth that customers pay.”

Even so, Shell and the others do affect costs by how a lot they produce. When provides are tight, extracting extra petroleum from the bottom will help ease strain on costs.

And Democratic lawmakers and others have criticized oil corporations for not turning extra of their giant income into productive use, preferring as a substitute to return extra money to shareholders by elevating dividends and thru inventory buybacks. Shell is utilizing almost half of its $19 billion in earnings in 2021 for share buybacks.

“By conserving home oil manufacturing low and funneling income again to traders and executives, the oil business is conserving power costs — and income — artificially excessive,” mentioned Pallone, the Vitality and Commerce Committee chair.

Advertisement

Executives of all 4 of the most important oil corporations testifying Wednesday mentioned they have been stepping up manufacturing, as did the 2 smaller power exploration and manufacturing corporations, Pioneer Pure Sources and Devon Vitality. Oklahoma Metropolis-based Devon mentioned it deliberate to extend rig rely by 35%, though provide chain issues and a scarcity of staff have been inflicting delays.

“I perceive the will to discover a fast repair for the current spike in gasoline costs, however neither Pioneer nor every other U.S. producer can enhance manufacturing in a single day by turning on a faucet,” mentioned Scott Sheffield, chief govt at Irving, Texas-based Pioneer, the most important oil producer within the Permian shale basin in Texas and New Mexico.

Nonetheless, he mentioned Pioneer plans to broaden oil manufacturing by about 5% a 12 months.

Amy Myers Jaffe, power skilled on the Fletcher College at Tufts College, mentioned shale oil corporations have been more likely to enhance manufacturing by about 900,000 barrels a day over a 12-month interval, including about 7% to the U.S. provide.

One approach to double that enhance, she mentioned, can be for the federal authorities to incentivize shale oil corporations by utilizing the Protection Manufacturing Act to allocate metal and different supplies wanted for elevated drilling, whereas agreeing to pay for and take possession of the additional oil that’s produced.

Advertisement

Biden administration officers are mentioned to be contemplating the concept, though conservatives in addition to some college students of historical past fear about such authorities involvement in markets.

As for the query of who’s accountable for the excessive gasoline costs, she mentioned there’s lots to go round.

They embody Saudi Arabia and OPEC for his or her reluctance to pump out extra petroleum; the oil giants for selecting buybacks and dividends over funding in additional manufacturing capability; and U.S. and Western sanctions in opposition to Russia for including to market distortions.

And shoppers themselves share some blame, she mentioned, for driving extra and growing demand, thereby citing costs.

“The straightforward approach to pay much less for gasoline is to make use of your automobile much less,” Jaffe mentioned. “So collectively, shoppers even have some market energy that they’ve chosen to not train.”

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

Dem leader condemns Thanksgiving bomb threats against liberal lawmakers after Team Trump targeted

Published

on

Dem leader condemns Thanksgiving bomb threats against liberal lawmakers after Team Trump targeted

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries condemned several threats, mostly focused on lawmakers from Connecticut, targeting members of his caucus, just days after numerous threats were made against President-elect Trump’s cabinet selections.

Jeffries, D-N.Y., confirmed in a statement Friday that several Democrats were targeted with threats ranging from pipe bombs in their mailboxes to “swatting” — or filing a false police report on another person’s behalf that often results in a SWAT team being dispatched.

All of the threatening messages were signed “MAGA,” Jeffries said, adding law enforcement found no ordnance at any of the targeted lawmakers’ homes.

“America is a democracy. Threats of violence against elected officials are unacceptable, unconscionable and have no place in a civilized society. All perpetrators of political violence directed at any party must be prosecuted to the full extent of the law,” he said.

TOP DEM: ‘UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRATION’ IS A THREAT TO NATIONAL SECURITY

Advertisement

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y.

“House Democrats will not be deterred or intimidated from serving the people by violent threats. We have been in close communication with the Sergeant at Arms office and it is imperative that Congress provide maximum protection for all Members and their families moving forward.”

After Jeffries spoke out, Rep. Seth Magaziner, a Democrat from neighboring Rhode Island, announced on Friday afternoon that his home had been targeted, as well. Magaziner said Providence police responded quickly and no one was harmed.

Sen. Christopher Murphy, D-Conn., had his home targeted by a bomb threat. A spokesperson said it appeared to be part of a “coordinated effort.”

Five other Democrats from the Constitution State received similar threats, including Reps. Joe Courtney, John Larson, Rosa DeLauro, Jahana Hayes and James Himes.

Advertisement

CT DEM SAYS IT’S CLEAR HUNTER BIDEN BROKE THE LAW

“There is no place for political violence in this country, and I hope that we may all continue through the holiday season with peace and civility,” said Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee who replaced Sen.-elect Adam Schiff, D-Calif.

Prior to that spate of threats, Trump’s U.N. ambassador-designate Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., said she was traveling home to her North Country district for Thanksgiving when she was informed of a threat against her home.

Former Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla. — Trump’s initial choice for attorney general — also received a threat.

Former Rep. Lee Zeldin, R-N.Y. — Trump’s nominee to lead the Environmental Protection Agency — said his home was subjected to a “pro-Palestinian-themed” pipe bomb threat. Zeldin is Jewish.

Advertisement

Former Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer, R-Ore., whom the president-elect tapped for Labor secretary, said her Oregon home was targeted, as was that of former San Diego Chargers cornerback Scott Turner, whom Trump named to lead the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Trump nominees including Cantor-Fitzgerald CEO Howard Lutnick, America First Policy Institute President Brooke Rollins and former Fox News host Pete Hegseth also received threats.

In a statement, the FBI said it is aware of “numerous bomb threats and swatting incidents targeting incoming administration nominees and appointees, and we are working with our law enforcement partners.”

“We take all potential threats seriously and, as always, encourage members of the public to immediately report anything they consider suspicious to law enforcement,” it said.

Advertisement

Fox News’ Kevin Ward contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Politics

Capitol rioter's defamation suit against Fox News is dismissed

Published

on

Capitol rioter's defamation suit against Fox News is dismissed

A Delaware court judge has dismissed a defamation lawsuit against Fox News filed by a Jan. 6 rioter who said the network falsely identified him as an FBI informant.

U.S. District Court Judge Jennifer L. Hall granted Fox News’ motion to dismiss the suit filed last year by Ray Epps.

Now based in Utah, Epps alleged his life was upended after former Fox host Tucker Carlson repeatedly described him as a federal agent who helped instigate the attack on the Capitol, which was an attempt to stop the certification of the election of Joe Biden.

Carlson described Epps as a principal in a false flag operation in which the government incited the Jan. 6 riot, an unfounded conspiracy theory. He made the false comments about Epps on his program over a period of nearly two years and in a series called “Patriot Purge” that streamed on Fox Nation in 2022.

In her remarks from the bench, Hall said Carlson did not act with malicious intent.

Advertisement

Fox News welcomed the judge’s decision, which is the third consecutive defamation case to be decided in favor of the network after the record $787-million settlement it paid to Dominion Voting Systems in April 2024.

Dominion said its business was damaged by false claims Fox News presented regarding voting fraud in the 2020 election. Fox News chose to settle the case rather than have its executives and on-air talent take the witness stand in a trial.

A separate defamation suit filed by Nina Jankowicz, the former head of the federal Disinformation Governance Board, was dismissed in July. Another case brought by Tony Bobulinski, a former business partner of Hunter Biden, was thrown out on Tuesday.

“Fox News is pleased with these back-to-back decisions from federal courts preserving the press freedoms of the First Amendment,” the network said in a statement.

Epps was at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, and pleaded guilty in January to a misdemeanor charge for his role in the riot.

Advertisement

Former prime-time host Tucker Carlson is seen in the studio on the set of his show on Fox News in New York in 2018.

(Jennifer S. Altman / For The Times)

Epps testified under oath to the House committee investigating the attack that he had no involvement with the FBI, which has also stated publicly that he had no association with the bureau.

The lawsuit claimed Epps and his wife received threatening voice mails, emails and text messages because of Carlson‘s comments. Epps told the CBS news magazine “60 Minutes” that the lies ruined his Arizona-based business and led to death threats.

Advertisement

Carlson’s prime-time program was pulled from the Fox News lineup on April 24, 2023, the day after Epps appeared on “60 Minutes.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Political betting markets still have plenty of action despite end of election season

Published

on

Political betting markets still have plenty of action despite end of election season

The end of the election season does not mean the end of political betting, with many platforms allowing users to place wagers on everything from the 2028 election to who will be confirmed to President-elect Donald Trump’s Cabinet.

“Some people will be amazed by this, but people are already betting on 2026 and 2028,” Maxim Lott, the founder of ElectionBettingOdds.com, told Fox News Digital. “There’s been about a quarter million dollars bet already.”

The comments come after the 2024 election produced plenty of betting action, with users across multiple platforms wagering over $2 billion on the outcome of the latest race. 

WHAT ARE ELECTION BETTING ODDS? EXPERT EXPLAINS WHY TRUMP IS CURRENT FAVORITE

President-elect Donald Trump, right, welcomes Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to the stage at a Turning Point Action campaign rally at the Gas South Arena on Oct. 23, 2024 in Duluth, Georgia. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Advertisement

While mega sporting events, such as the Super Bowl and the recent Mike Tyson vs. Jake Paul fight, gives gamblers plenty to wager on after the election, those looking for something political to bet on will still have plenty of options.

One of the most popular topics is who will be the nominees for both major parties in 2028, with ElectionBettingOdds.com showing California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Vice President-elect JD Vance being the current leaders for Democrats and Republicans, respectively.

Other names with a significant amount of attention for betters include Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer for the Democratic nomination, while Vance is trailed by names like entrepreneur and future head of the new Department of Government Efficiency Vivek Ramaswamy and Donald Trump Jr. on the Republican side.

“The big Democratic governors are favored to be the next nominee,” Lott said, noting that Vance currently holds a sizable lead over other options on the GOP side.

Democratic Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer. (Bill Pugliano/Getty Images)

TRUMP OPENS UP LARGEST BETTING LEAD SINCE DAYS AFTER BIDEN’S DROPOUT

Advertisement

Vance is also the current betting leader on who will win the 2028 presidential election, ElectionBettingOdds.com shows, followed by Newson and Shapiro as the next two likely options.

However, Lott warned it is still too early to tell what the future holds, noting that the markets will start to provide more clarity as more information becomes known over the next few years.

“As the future becomes clearer… as we get closer to 2026, 2028, these odds will change,” Lott said. “So if the Trump administration is doing really well, the economy is booming, inflation is not out of control, wars are ending, Vance’s odds will certainly go up.”

Bettors also are not limited to wagering on elections, with platforms such as Polymarket allowing users to place bets on Trump’s picks to serve in his Cabinet and whether they will be confirmed. Bettors can also place wagers on questions such as if they believe the war in Ukraine will end in Trump’s first 90 days or if there will be a cease-fire in Gaza in 2024.

Sen. JD Vance

Vice President-elect JD Vance. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

Advertisement

According to Lott, taking a look at the current betting odds for many scenarios can help inform you about what is going on in the world, even if you do not place bets yourself.

“People often ask… is there any value to this… it’s just gambling. It’s silly,” Lott said. “But actually it’s very useful… if you want to know what’s going to happen in 2028 or if the Trump administration is going to be a success, you could read 100 news articles on it. Some will misinform you. Or, you can just go to the prediction markets and see… is Vance a 20% chance of becoming the next Republican nominee or is he a 90% chance? That tells you a lot.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending